Baozun Inc.
Baozun Inc. BZUN Peers
See (BZUN) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Specialty Retail Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BZUN | $3.40 | -2.58% | 184.21M | -7.91 | -$0.43 | N/A |
| AMZN | $210.25 | -0.53% | 2.23T | 34.30 | $6.13 | N/A |
| BABA | $134.04 | +1.82% | 320.94B | 15.34 | $8.74 | N/A |
| MELI | $2,564.00 | +1.94% | 129.99B | 62.94 | $40.74 | N/A |
| SE | $163.15 | +5.85% | 96.59B | 220.47 | $0.74 | N/A |
| ORLY | $1,325.73 | +0.37% | 75.55B | 32.49 | $40.81 | N/A |
| CVNA | $305.54 | +4.26% | 65.43B | 106.46 | $2.87 | N/A |
| AZO | $3,641.43 | -0.09% | 60.92B | 24.43 | $149.07 | N/A |
| JD | $35.73 | -4.08% | 48.91B | 9.63 | $3.71 | +2.75% |
| CPNG | $26.91 | +1.30% | 48.85B | 192.18 | $0.14 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
BZUN vs AMZN Comparison
BZUN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZUN stands at 184.21M. In comparison, AMZN has a market cap of 2.23T. Regarding current trading prices, BZUN is priced at $3.40, while AMZN trades at $210.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZUN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.91, whereas AMZN's P/E ratio is 34.30. In terms of profitability, BZUN's ROE is -0.05%, compared to AMZN's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, BZUN is more volatile compared to AMZN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZUN.
BZUN vs BABA Comparison
BZUN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZUN stands at 184.21M. In comparison, BABA has a market cap of 320.94B. Regarding current trading prices, BZUN is priced at $3.40, while BABA trades at $134.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZUN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.91, whereas BABA's P/E ratio is 15.34. In terms of profitability, BZUN's ROE is -0.05%, compared to BABA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BZUN is more volatile compared to BABA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZUN.
BZUN vs MELI Comparison
BZUN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZUN stands at 184.21M. In comparison, MELI has a market cap of 129.99B. Regarding current trading prices, BZUN is priced at $3.40, while MELI trades at $2,564.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZUN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.91, whereas MELI's P/E ratio is 62.94. In terms of profitability, BZUN's ROE is -0.05%, compared to MELI's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, BZUN is more volatile compared to MELI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZUN.
BZUN vs SE Comparison
BZUN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZUN stands at 184.21M. In comparison, SE has a market cap of 96.59B. Regarding current trading prices, BZUN is priced at $3.40, while SE trades at $163.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZUN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.91, whereas SE's P/E ratio is 220.47. In terms of profitability, BZUN's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BZUN is more volatile compared to SE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZUN.
BZUN vs ORLY Comparison
BZUN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZUN stands at 184.21M. In comparison, ORLY has a market cap of 75.55B. Regarding current trading prices, BZUN is priced at $3.40, while ORLY trades at $1,325.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZUN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.91, whereas ORLY's P/E ratio is 32.49. In terms of profitability, BZUN's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ORLY's ROE of -1.65%. Regarding short-term risk, BZUN is more volatile compared to ORLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZUN.
BZUN vs CVNA Comparison
BZUN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZUN stands at 184.21M. In comparison, CVNA has a market cap of 65.43B. Regarding current trading prices, BZUN is priced at $3.40, while CVNA trades at $305.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZUN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.91, whereas CVNA's P/E ratio is 106.46. In terms of profitability, BZUN's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CVNA's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, BZUN is less volatile compared to CVNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZUN.
BZUN vs AZO Comparison
BZUN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZUN stands at 184.21M. In comparison, AZO has a market cap of 60.92B. Regarding current trading prices, BZUN is priced at $3.40, while AZO trades at $3,641.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZUN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.91, whereas AZO's P/E ratio is 24.43. In terms of profitability, BZUN's ROE is -0.05%, compared to AZO's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, BZUN is more volatile compared to AZO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZUN.
BZUN vs JD Comparison
BZUN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZUN stands at 184.21M. In comparison, JD has a market cap of 48.91B. Regarding current trading prices, BZUN is priced at $3.40, while JD trades at $35.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZUN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.91, whereas JD's P/E ratio is 9.63. In terms of profitability, BZUN's ROE is -0.05%, compared to JD's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BZUN is more volatile compared to JD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZUN.
BZUN vs CPNG Comparison
BZUN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZUN stands at 184.21M. In comparison, CPNG has a market cap of 48.85B. Regarding current trading prices, BZUN is priced at $3.40, while CPNG trades at $26.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZUN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.91, whereas CPNG's P/E ratio is 192.18. In terms of profitability, BZUN's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CPNG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BZUN is more volatile compared to CPNG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZUN.
BZUN vs PDD Comparison
BZUN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZUN stands at 184.21M. In comparison, PDD has a market cap of 42.20B. Regarding current trading prices, BZUN is priced at $3.40, while PDD trades at $118.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZUN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.91, whereas PDD's P/E ratio is 11.32. In terms of profitability, BZUN's ROE is -0.05%, compared to PDD's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, BZUN is more volatile compared to PDD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZUN.
BZUN vs VIPS Comparison
BZUN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZUN stands at 184.21M. In comparison, VIPS has a market cap of 38.23B. Regarding current trading prices, BZUN is priced at $3.40, while VIPS trades at $14.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZUN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.91, whereas VIPS's P/E ratio is 7.54. In terms of profitability, BZUN's ROE is -0.05%, compared to VIPS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, BZUN is more volatile compared to VIPS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZUN.
BZUN vs EBAY Comparison
BZUN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZUN stands at 184.21M. In comparison, EBAY has a market cap of 31.88B. Regarding current trading prices, BZUN is priced at $3.40, while EBAY trades at $69.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZUN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.91, whereas EBAY's P/E ratio is 16.62. In terms of profitability, BZUN's ROE is -0.05%, compared to EBAY's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, BZUN is more volatile compared to EBAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZUN.
BZUN vs TSCO Comparison
BZUN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZUN stands at 184.21M. In comparison, TSCO has a market cap of 27.24B. Regarding current trading prices, BZUN is priced at $3.40, while TSCO trades at $51.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZUN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.91, whereas TSCO's P/E ratio is 25.56. In terms of profitability, BZUN's ROE is -0.05%, compared to TSCO's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, BZUN is more volatile compared to TSCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZUN.
BZUN vs FIVE Comparison
BZUN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZUN stands at 184.21M. In comparison, FIVE has a market cap of 22.97B. Regarding current trading prices, BZUN is priced at $3.40, while FIVE trades at $104.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZUN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.91, whereas FIVE's P/E ratio is 22.68. In terms of profitability, BZUN's ROE is -0.05%, compared to FIVE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BZUN is more volatile compared to FIVE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZUN.
BZUN vs WSM Comparison
BZUN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZUN stands at 184.21M. In comparison, WSM has a market cap of 21.10B. Regarding current trading prices, BZUN is priced at $3.40, while WSM trades at $171.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZUN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.91, whereas WSM's P/E ratio is 19.52. In terms of profitability, BZUN's ROE is -0.05%, compared to WSM's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, BZUN is more volatile compared to WSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZUN.
BZUN vs ULTA Comparison
BZUN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZUN stands at 184.21M. In comparison, ULTA has a market cap of 18.64B. Regarding current trading prices, BZUN is priced at $3.40, while ULTA trades at $411.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZUN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.91, whereas ULTA's P/E ratio is 16.23. In terms of profitability, BZUN's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ULTA's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, BZUN is more volatile compared to ULTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZUN.
BZUN vs GPC Comparison
BZUN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZUN stands at 184.21M. In comparison, GPC has a market cap of 17.24B. Regarding current trading prices, BZUN is priced at $3.40, while GPC trades at $124.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZUN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.91, whereas GPC's P/E ratio is 20.43. In terms of profitability, BZUN's ROE is -0.05%, compared to GPC's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BZUN is more volatile compared to GPC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZUN.
BZUN vs CHWY Comparison
BZUN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZUN stands at 184.21M. In comparison, CHWY has a market cap of 16.95B. Regarding current trading prices, BZUN is priced at $3.40, while CHWY trades at $40.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZUN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.91, whereas CHWY's P/E ratio is 45.03. In terms of profitability, BZUN's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CHWY's ROE of +0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, BZUN is more volatile compared to CHWY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZUN.
BZUN vs DKS Comparison
BZUN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZUN stands at 184.21M. In comparison, DKS has a market cap of 16.79B. Regarding current trading prices, BZUN is priced at $3.40, while DKS trades at $209.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZUN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.91, whereas DKS's P/E ratio is 14.91. In terms of profitability, BZUN's ROE is -0.05%, compared to DKS's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, BZUN is more volatile compared to DKS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZUN.
BZUN vs CASY Comparison
BZUN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZUN stands at 184.21M. In comparison, CASY has a market cap of 15.99B. Regarding current trading prices, BZUN is priced at $3.40, while CASY trades at $430.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZUN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.91, whereas CASY's P/E ratio is 29.98. In terms of profitability, BZUN's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CASY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BZUN is more volatile compared to CASY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZUN.
BZUN vs BBY Comparison
BZUN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZUN stands at 184.21M. In comparison, BBY has a market cap of 15.53B. Regarding current trading prices, BZUN is priced at $3.40, while BBY trades at $73.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZUN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.91, whereas BBY's P/E ratio is 17.14. In terms of profitability, BZUN's ROE is -0.05%, compared to BBY's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, BZUN is more volatile compared to BBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZUN.
BZUN vs GME Comparison
BZUN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZUN stands at 184.21M. In comparison, GME has a market cap of 12.85B. Regarding current trading prices, BZUN is priced at $3.40, while GME trades at $28.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZUN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.91, whereas GME's P/E ratio is 87.06. In terms of profitability, BZUN's ROE is -0.05%, compared to GME's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BZUN is more volatile compared to GME. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZUN.
BZUN vs CART Comparison
BZUN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZUN stands at 184.21M. In comparison, CART has a market cap of 11.79B. Regarding current trading prices, BZUN is priced at $3.40, while CART trades at $45.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZUN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.91, whereas CART's P/E ratio is 29.74. In terms of profitability, BZUN's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CART's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BZUN is more volatile compared to CART. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZUN.
BZUN vs MUSA Comparison
BZUN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZUN stands at 184.21M. In comparison, MUSA has a market cap of 8.68B. Regarding current trading prices, BZUN is priced at $3.40, while MUSA trades at $439.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZUN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.91, whereas MUSA's P/E ratio is 18.58. In terms of profitability, BZUN's ROE is -0.05%, compared to MUSA's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, BZUN is more volatile compared to MUSA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZUN.
BZUN vs BBWI Comparison
BZUN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZUN stands at 184.21M. In comparison, BBWI has a market cap of 7.24B. Regarding current trading prices, BZUN is priced at $3.40, while BBWI trades at $34.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZUN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.91, whereas BBWI's P/E ratio is 9.42. In terms of profitability, BZUN's ROE is -0.05%, compared to BBWI's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, BZUN is more volatile compared to BBWI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZUN.
BZUN vs GLBE Comparison
BZUN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZUN stands at 184.21M. In comparison, GLBE has a market cap of 5.81B. Regarding current trading prices, BZUN is priced at $3.40, while GLBE trades at $34.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZUN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.91, whereas GLBE's P/E ratio is -76.18. In terms of profitability, BZUN's ROE is -0.05%, compared to GLBE's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BZUN is less volatile compared to GLBE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZUN.
BZUN vs QVCGP Comparison
BZUN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZUN stands at 184.21M. In comparison, QVCGP has a market cap of 5.34B. Regarding current trading prices, BZUN is priced at $3.40, while QVCGP trades at $13.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZUN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.91, whereas QVCGP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BZUN's ROE is -0.05%, compared to QVCGP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BZUN is less volatile compared to QVCGP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZUN.
BZUN vs W Comparison
BZUN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZUN stands at 184.21M. In comparison, W has a market cap of 4.94B. Regarding current trading prices, BZUN is priced at $3.40, while W trades at $38.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZUN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.91, whereas W's P/E ratio is -13.57. In terms of profitability, BZUN's ROE is -0.05%, compared to W's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BZUN is less volatile compared to W. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZUN.
BZUN vs ETSY Comparison
BZUN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZUN stands at 184.21M. In comparison, ETSY has a market cap of 4.90B. Regarding current trading prices, BZUN is priced at $3.40, while ETSY trades at $46.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZUN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.91, whereas ETSY's P/E ratio is 34.03. In terms of profitability, BZUN's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ETSY's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, BZUN is more volatile compared to ETSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZUN.
BZUN vs RH Comparison
BZUN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZUN stands at 184.21M. In comparison, RH has a market cap of 4.05B. Regarding current trading prices, BZUN is priced at $3.40, while RH trades at $216.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZUN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.91, whereas RH's P/E ratio is 59.67. In terms of profitability, BZUN's ROE is -0.05%, compared to RH's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, BZUN is less volatile compared to RH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZUN.
BZUN vs ASO Comparison
BZUN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZUN stands at 184.21M. In comparison, ASO has a market cap of 3.05B. Regarding current trading prices, BZUN is priced at $3.40, while ASO trades at $45.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZUN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.91, whereas ASO's P/E ratio is 7.98. In terms of profitability, BZUN's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ASO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BZUN is more volatile compared to ASO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZUN.
BZUN vs OZON Comparison
BZUN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZUN stands at 184.21M. In comparison, OZON has a market cap of 2.42B. Regarding current trading prices, BZUN is priced at $3.40, while OZON trades at $11.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZUN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.91, whereas OZON's P/E ratio is -2.61. In terms of profitability, BZUN's ROE is -0.05%, compared to OZON's ROE of +0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, BZUN is less volatile compared to OZON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZUN.
BZUN vs AAP Comparison
BZUN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZUN stands at 184.21M. In comparison, AAP has a market cap of 1.96B. Regarding current trading prices, BZUN is priced at $3.40, while AAP trades at $32.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZUN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.91, whereas AAP's P/E ratio is -3.32. In terms of profitability, BZUN's ROE is -0.05%, compared to AAP's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BZUN is more volatile compared to AAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZUN.
BZUN vs MNSO Comparison
BZUN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZUN stands at 184.21M. In comparison, MNSO has a market cap of 1.54B. Regarding current trading prices, BZUN is priced at $3.40, while MNSO trades at $19.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZUN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.91, whereas MNSO's P/E ratio is 17.32. In terms of profitability, BZUN's ROE is -0.05%, compared to MNSO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, BZUN is more volatile compared to MNSO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZUN.
BZUN vs SVV Comparison
BZUN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZUN stands at 184.21M. In comparison, SVV has a market cap of 1.51B. Regarding current trading prices, BZUN is priced at $3.40, while SVV trades at $9.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZUN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.91, whereas SVV's P/E ratio is 68.36. In terms of profitability, BZUN's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SVV's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BZUN is less volatile compared to SVV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZUN.
BZUN vs EYE Comparison
BZUN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZUN stands at 184.21M. In comparison, EYE has a market cap of 1.47B. Regarding current trading prices, BZUN is priced at $3.40, while EYE trades at $18.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZUN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.91, whereas EYE's P/E ratio is -58.22. In terms of profitability, BZUN's ROE is -0.05%, compared to EYE's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BZUN is more volatile compared to EYE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZUN.
BZUN vs WINA Comparison
BZUN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZUN stands at 184.21M. In comparison, WINA has a market cap of 1.47B. Regarding current trading prices, BZUN is priced at $3.40, while WINA trades at $416.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZUN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.91, whereas WINA's P/E ratio is 37.27. In terms of profitability, BZUN's ROE is -0.05%, compared to WINA's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, BZUN is more volatile compared to WINA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZUN.
BZUN vs RVLV Comparison
BZUN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZUN stands at 184.21M. In comparison, RVLV has a market cap of 1.42B. Regarding current trading prices, BZUN is priced at $3.40, while RVLV trades at $19.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZUN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.91, whereas RVLV's P/E ratio is 28.42. In terms of profitability, BZUN's ROE is -0.05%, compared to RVLV's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BZUN is more volatile compared to RVLV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZUN.
BZUN vs TA Comparison
BZUN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZUN stands at 184.21M. In comparison, TA has a market cap of 1.30B. Regarding current trading prices, BZUN is priced at $3.40, while TA trades at $86.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZUN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.91, whereas TA's P/E ratio is 9.03. In terms of profitability, BZUN's ROE is -0.05%, compared to TA's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BZUN is more volatile compared to TA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZUN.
BZUN vs EVGO Comparison
BZUN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZUN stands at 184.21M. In comparison, EVGO has a market cap of 1.24B. Regarding current trading prices, BZUN is priced at $3.40, while EVGO trades at $4.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZUN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.91, whereas EVGO's P/E ratio is -9.88. In terms of profitability, BZUN's ROE is -0.05%, compared to EVGO's ROE of +0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, BZUN is less volatile compared to EVGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZUN.
BZUN vs EVGOW Comparison
BZUN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZUN stands at 184.21M. In comparison, EVGOW has a market cap of 1.21B. Regarding current trading prices, BZUN is priced at $3.40, while EVGOW trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZUN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.91, whereas EVGOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BZUN's ROE is -0.05%, compared to EVGOW's ROE of +0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, BZUN is less volatile compared to EVGOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZUN.
BZUN vs TANNI Comparison
BZUN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZUN stands at 184.21M. In comparison, TANNI has a market cap of 1.00B. Regarding current trading prices, BZUN is priced at $3.40, while TANNI trades at $25.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZUN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.91, whereas TANNI's P/E ratio is 35.27. In terms of profitability, BZUN's ROE is -0.05%, compared to TANNI's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BZUN is more volatile compared to TANNI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZUN.
BZUN vs SBH Comparison
BZUN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZUN stands at 184.21M. In comparison, SBH has a market cap of 932.26M. Regarding current trading prices, BZUN is priced at $3.40, while SBH trades at $9.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZUN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.91, whereas SBH's P/E ratio is 5.25. In terms of profitability, BZUN's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SBH's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, BZUN is less volatile compared to SBH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZUN.
BZUN vs HEPS Comparison
BZUN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZUN stands at 184.21M. In comparison, HEPS has a market cap of 912.79M. Regarding current trading prices, BZUN is priced at $3.40, while HEPS trades at $2.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZUN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.91, whereas HEPS's P/E ratio is -20.00. In terms of profitability, BZUN's ROE is -0.05%, compared to HEPS's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, BZUN is more volatile compared to HEPS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZUN.
BZUN vs RERE Comparison
BZUN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZUN stands at 184.21M. In comparison, RERE has a market cap of 907.62M. Regarding current trading prices, BZUN is priced at $3.40, while RERE trades at $2.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZUN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.91, whereas RERE's P/E ratio is -54.50. In terms of profitability, BZUN's ROE is -0.05%, compared to RERE's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BZUN is less volatile compared to RERE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZUN.
BZUN vs WOOF Comparison
BZUN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZUN stands at 184.21M. In comparison, WOOF has a market cap of 879.15M. Regarding current trading prices, BZUN is priced at $3.40, while WOOF trades at $3.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZUN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.91, whereas WOOF's P/E ratio is -8.57. In terms of profitability, BZUN's ROE is -0.05%, compared to WOOF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BZUN is more volatile compared to WOOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZUN.
BZUN vs OLPX Comparison
BZUN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZUN stands at 184.21M. In comparison, OLPX has a market cap of 852.38M. Regarding current trading prices, BZUN is priced at $3.40, while OLPX trades at $1.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZUN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.91, whereas OLPX's P/E ratio is 64.00. In terms of profitability, BZUN's ROE is -0.05%, compared to OLPX's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BZUN is less volatile compared to OLPX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZUN.
BZUN vs TDUP Comparison
BZUN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZUN stands at 184.21M. In comparison, TDUP has a market cap of 818.27M. Regarding current trading prices, BZUN is priced at $3.40, while TDUP trades at $6.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZUN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.91, whereas TDUP's P/E ratio is -23.86. In terms of profitability, BZUN's ROE is -0.05%, compared to TDUP's ROE of -0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, BZUN is less volatile compared to TDUP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZUN.
BZUN vs LQDT Comparison
BZUN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZUN stands at 184.21M. In comparison, LQDT has a market cap of 788.63M. Regarding current trading prices, BZUN is priced at $3.40, while LQDT trades at $25.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZUN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.91, whereas LQDT's P/E ratio is 31.97. In terms of profitability, BZUN's ROE is -0.05%, compared to LQDT's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BZUN is more volatile compared to LQDT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZUN.
BZUN vs OSTK Comparison
BZUN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZUN stands at 184.21M. In comparison, OSTK has a market cap of 768.04M. Regarding current trading prices, BZUN is priced at $3.40, while OSTK trades at $16.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZUN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.91, whereas OSTK's P/E ratio is -4.64. In terms of profitability, BZUN's ROE is -0.05%, compared to OSTK's ROE of -1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BZUN is more volatile compared to OSTK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZUN.
BZUN vs ARKO Comparison
BZUN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZUN stands at 184.21M. In comparison, ARKO has a market cap of 598.26M. Regarding current trading prices, BZUN is priced at $3.40, while ARKO trades at $5.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZUN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.91, whereas ARKO's P/E ratio is 175.00. In terms of profitability, BZUN's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ARKO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BZUN is more volatile compared to ARKO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZUN.
BZUN vs HNST Comparison
BZUN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZUN stands at 184.21M. In comparison, HNST has a market cap of 555.59M. Regarding current trading prices, BZUN is priced at $3.40, while HNST trades at $5.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZUN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.91, whereas HNST's P/E ratio is -252.00. In terms of profitability, BZUN's ROE is -0.05%, compared to HNST's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BZUN is more volatile compared to HNST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZUN.
BZUN vs BBW Comparison
BZUN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZUN stands at 184.21M. In comparison, BBW has a market cap of 554.65M. Regarding current trading prices, BZUN is priced at $3.40, while BBW trades at $42.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZUN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.91, whereas BBW's P/E ratio is 11.05. In terms of profitability, BZUN's ROE is -0.05%, compared to BBW's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, BZUN is more volatile compared to BBW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZUN.
BZUN vs ODP Comparison
BZUN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZUN stands at 184.21M. In comparison, ODP has a market cap of 543.89M. Regarding current trading prices, BZUN is priced at $3.40, while ODP trades at $18.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZUN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.91, whereas ODP's P/E ratio is 14.12. In terms of profitability, BZUN's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ODP's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BZUN is more volatile compared to ODP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZUN.
BZUN vs HZO Comparison
BZUN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZUN stands at 184.21M. In comparison, HZO has a market cap of 506.66M. Regarding current trading prices, BZUN is priced at $3.40, while HZO trades at $23.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZUN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.91, whereas HZO's P/E ratio is 9.63. In terms of profitability, BZUN's ROE is -0.05%, compared to HZO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BZUN is more volatile compared to HZO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZUN.
BZUN vs BNED Comparison
BZUN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZUN stands at 184.21M. In comparison, BNED has a market cap of 384.13M. Regarding current trading prices, BZUN is priced at $3.40, while BNED trades at $11.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZUN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.91, whereas BNED's P/E ratio is -0.93. In terms of profitability, BZUN's ROE is -0.05%, compared to BNED's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, BZUN is less volatile compared to BNED. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZUN.
BZUN vs BWMX Comparison
BZUN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZUN stands at 184.21M. In comparison, BWMX has a market cap of 354.51M. Regarding current trading prices, BZUN is priced at $3.40, while BWMX trades at $9.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZUN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.91, whereas BWMX's P/E ratio is -47.50. In terms of profitability, BZUN's ROE is -0.05%, compared to BWMX's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, BZUN is more volatile compared to BWMX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZUN.
BZUN vs CHPT Comparison
BZUN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZUN stands at 184.21M. In comparison, CHPT has a market cap of 322.46M. Regarding current trading prices, BZUN is priced at $3.40, while CHPT trades at $0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZUN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.91, whereas CHPT's P/E ratio is -1.09. In terms of profitability, BZUN's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CHPT's ROE of -1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, BZUN is less volatile compared to CHPT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZUN.
BZUN vs BYON Comparison
BZUN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZUN stands at 184.21M. In comparison, BYON has a market cap of 322.43M. Regarding current trading prices, BZUN is priced at $3.40, while BYON trades at $5.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZUN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.91, whereas BYON's P/E ratio is -1.19. In terms of profitability, BZUN's ROE is -0.05%, compared to BYON's ROE of -1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BZUN is less volatile compared to BYON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZUN.
BZUN vs FLWS Comparison
BZUN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZUN stands at 184.21M. In comparison, FLWS has a market cap of 307.83M. Regarding current trading prices, BZUN is priced at $3.40, while FLWS trades at $4.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZUN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.91, whereas FLWS's P/E ratio is -1.83. In terms of profitability, BZUN's ROE is -0.05%, compared to FLWS's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, BZUN is less volatile compared to FLWS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZUN.
BZUN vs LE Comparison
BZUN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZUN stands at 184.21M. In comparison, LE has a market cap of 288.74M. Regarding current trading prices, BZUN is priced at $3.40, while LE trades at $9.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZUN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.91, whereas LE's P/E ratio is 46.75. In terms of profitability, BZUN's ROE is -0.05%, compared to LE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BZUN is more volatile compared to LE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZUN.
BZUN vs FTCH Comparison
BZUN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZUN stands at 184.21M. In comparison, FTCH has a market cap of 254.21M. Regarding current trading prices, BZUN is priced at $3.40, while FTCH trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZUN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.91, whereas FTCH's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, BZUN's ROE is -0.05%, compared to FTCH's ROE of +0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, BZUN is less volatile compared to FTCH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZUN.
BZUN vs BARK Comparison
BZUN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZUN stands at 184.21M. In comparison, BARK has a market cap of 227.39M. Regarding current trading prices, BZUN is priced at $3.40, while BARK trades at $1.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZUN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.91, whereas BARK's P/E ratio is -7.22. In terms of profitability, BZUN's ROE is -0.05%, compared to BARK's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, BZUN is more volatile compared to BARK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZUN.
BZUN vs BARK-WT Comparison
BZUN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZUN stands at 184.21M. In comparison, BARK-WT has a market cap of 224.95M. Regarding current trading prices, BZUN is priced at $3.40, while BARK-WT trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZUN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.91, whereas BARK-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BZUN's ROE is -0.05%, compared to BARK-WT's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, BZUN is less volatile compared to BARK-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZUN.
BZUN vs QRTEA Comparison
BZUN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZUN stands at 184.21M. In comparison, QRTEA has a market cap of 213.51M. Regarding current trading prices, BZUN is priced at $3.40, while QRTEA trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZUN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.91, whereas QRTEA's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, BZUN's ROE is -0.05%, compared to QRTEA's ROE of -9.33%. Regarding short-term risk, BZUN is more volatile compared to QRTEA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZUN.
BZUN vs JMIA Comparison
BZUN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZUN stands at 184.21M. In comparison, JMIA has a market cap of 200.53M. Regarding current trading prices, BZUN is priced at $3.40, while JMIA trades at $3.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZUN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.91, whereas JMIA's P/E ratio is -5.20. In terms of profitability, BZUN's ROE is -0.05%, compared to JMIA's ROE of -1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BZUN is less volatile compared to JMIA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZUN.
BZUN vs LOGC Comparison
BZUN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZUN stands at 184.21M. In comparison, LOGC has a market cap of 193.93M. Regarding current trading prices, BZUN is priced at $3.40, while LOGC trades at $7.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZUN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.91, whereas LOGC's P/E ratio is -9.70. In terms of profitability, BZUN's ROE is -0.05%, compared to LOGC's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BZUN is less volatile compared to LOGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZUN.
BZUN vs WBUY Comparison
BZUN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZUN stands at 184.21M. In comparison, WBUY has a market cap of 170.74M. Regarding current trading prices, BZUN is priced at $3.40, while WBUY trades at $7.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZUN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.91, whereas WBUY's P/E ratio is -0.65. In terms of profitability, BZUN's ROE is -0.05%, compared to WBUY's ROE of -3.46%. Regarding short-term risk, BZUN is less volatile compared to WBUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZUN.
BZUN vs NEGG Comparison
BZUN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZUN stands at 184.21M. In comparison, NEGG has a market cap of 154.98M. Regarding current trading prices, BZUN is priced at $3.40, while NEGG trades at $7.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZUN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.91, whereas NEGG's P/E ratio is -3.55. In terms of profitability, BZUN's ROE is -0.05%, compared to NEGG's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, BZUN is less volatile compared to NEGG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZUN.
BZUN vs VLTA Comparison
BZUN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZUN stands at 184.21M. In comparison, VLTA has a market cap of 149.96M. Regarding current trading prices, BZUN is priced at $3.40, while VLTA trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZUN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.91, whereas VLTA's P/E ratio is -1.30. In terms of profitability, BZUN's ROE is -0.05%, compared to VLTA's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, BZUN is more volatile compared to VLTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZUN.
BZUN vs AKA Comparison
BZUN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZUN stands at 184.21M. In comparison, AKA has a market cap of 144.97M. Regarding current trading prices, BZUN is priced at $3.40, while AKA trades at $13.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZUN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.91, whereas AKA's P/E ratio is -5.51. In terms of profitability, BZUN's ROE is -0.05%, compared to AKA's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, BZUN is less volatile compared to AKA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZUN.
BZUN vs DADA Comparison
BZUN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZUN stands at 184.21M. In comparison, DADA has a market cap of 132.82M. Regarding current trading prices, BZUN is priced at $3.40, while DADA trades at $2.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZUN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.91, whereas DADA's P/E ratio is -1.90. In terms of profitability, BZUN's ROE is -0.05%, compared to DADA's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, BZUN is more volatile compared to DADA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZUN.
BZUN vs QRTEP Comparison
BZUN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZUN stands at 184.21M. In comparison, QRTEP has a market cap of 130.03M. Regarding current trading prices, BZUN is priced at $3.40, while QRTEP trades at $39.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZUN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.91, whereas QRTEP's P/E ratio is 120.21. In terms of profitability, BZUN's ROE is -0.05%, compared to QRTEP's ROE of -573.33%. Regarding short-term risk, BZUN is more volatile compared to QRTEP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZUN.
BZUN vs GOED Comparison
BZUN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZUN stands at 184.21M. In comparison, GOED has a market cap of 129.43M. Regarding current trading prices, BZUN is priced at $3.40, while GOED trades at $1.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZUN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.91, whereas GOED's P/E ratio is 1.81. In terms of profitability, BZUN's ROE is -0.05%, compared to GOED's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, BZUN is less volatile compared to GOED. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZUN.
BZUN vs OCG Comparison
BZUN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZUN stands at 184.21M. In comparison, OCG has a market cap of 122.00M. Regarding current trading prices, BZUN is priced at $3.40, while OCG trades at $6.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZUN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.91, whereas OCG's P/E ratio is -10.60. In terms of profitability, BZUN's ROE is -0.05%, compared to OCG's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BZUN is less volatile compared to OCG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZUN.
BZUN vs APRN Comparison
BZUN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZUN stands at 184.21M. In comparison, APRN has a market cap of 99.98M. Regarding current trading prices, BZUN is priced at $3.40, while APRN trades at $12.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZUN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.91, whereas APRN's P/E ratio is -0.70. In terms of profitability, BZUN's ROE is -0.05%, compared to APRN's ROE of +3.45%. Regarding short-term risk, BZUN is more volatile compared to APRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZUN.
BZUN vs QVCGB Comparison
BZUN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZUN stands at 184.21M. In comparison, QVCGB has a market cap of 95.45M. Regarding current trading prices, BZUN is priced at $3.40, while QVCGB trades at $5.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZUN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.91, whereas QVCGB's P/E ratio is -1.56. In terms of profitability, BZUN's ROE is -0.05%, compared to QVCGB's ROE of -573.33%. Regarding short-term risk, BZUN is less volatile compared to QVCGB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZUN.
BZUN vs DIBS Comparison
BZUN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZUN stands at 184.21M. In comparison, DIBS has a market cap of 87.43M. Regarding current trading prices, BZUN is priced at $3.40, while DIBS trades at $2.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZUN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.91, whereas DIBS's P/E ratio is -4.45. In terms of profitability, BZUN's ROE is -0.05%, compared to DIBS's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BZUN is less volatile compared to DIBS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZUN.
BZUN vs SPWH Comparison
BZUN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZUN stands at 184.21M. In comparison, SPWH has a market cap of 76.96M. Regarding current trading prices, BZUN is priced at $3.40, while SPWH trades at $2.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZUN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.91, whereas SPWH's P/E ratio is -2.31. In terms of profitability, BZUN's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SPWH's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BZUN is less volatile compared to SPWH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZUN.
BZUN vs GRWG Comparison
BZUN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZUN stands at 184.21M. In comparison, GRWG has a market cap of 66.64M. Regarding current trading prices, BZUN is priced at $3.40, while GRWG trades at $1.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZUN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.91, whereas GRWG's P/E ratio is -1.33. In terms of profitability, BZUN's ROE is -0.05%, compared to GRWG's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, BZUN is less volatile compared to GRWG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZUN.
BZUN vs NHTC Comparison
BZUN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZUN stands at 184.21M. In comparison, NHTC has a market cap of 53.19M. Regarding current trading prices, BZUN is priced at $3.40, while NHTC trades at $4.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZUN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.91, whereas NHTC's P/E ratio is 115.50. In terms of profitability, BZUN's ROE is -0.05%, compared to NHTC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BZUN is less volatile compared to NHTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZUN.
BZUN vs QVCGA Comparison
BZUN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZUN stands at 184.21M. In comparison, QVCGA has a market cap of 52.84M. Regarding current trading prices, BZUN is priced at $3.40, while QVCGA trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZUN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.91, whereas QVCGA's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, BZUN's ROE is -0.05%, compared to QVCGA's ROE of -573.33%. Regarding short-term risk, BZUN is less volatile compared to QVCGA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZUN.
BZUN vs QRTEB Comparison
BZUN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZUN stands at 184.21M. In comparison, QRTEB has a market cap of 51.32M. Regarding current trading prices, BZUN is priced at $3.40, while QRTEB trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZUN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.91, whereas QRTEB's P/E ratio is -2.82. In terms of profitability, BZUN's ROE is -0.05%, compared to QRTEB's ROE of -573.33%. Regarding short-term risk, BZUN is less volatile compared to QRTEB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZUN.
BZUN vs CTIB Comparison
BZUN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZUN stands at 184.21M. In comparison, CTIB has a market cap of 48.23M. Regarding current trading prices, BZUN is priced at $3.40, while CTIB trades at $2.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZUN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.91, whereas CTIB's P/E ratio is -26.67. In terms of profitability, BZUN's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CTIB's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, BZUN is less volatile compared to CTIB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZUN.
BZUN vs HOUR Comparison
BZUN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZUN stands at 184.21M. In comparison, HOUR has a market cap of 48.17M. Regarding current trading prices, BZUN is priced at $3.40, while HOUR trades at $1.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZUN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.91, whereas HOUR's P/E ratio is 68.50. In terms of profitability, BZUN's ROE is -0.05%, compared to HOUR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BZUN is less volatile compared to HOUR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZUN.
BZUN vs PRTS Comparison
BZUN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZUN stands at 184.21M. In comparison, PRTS has a market cap of 46.21M. Regarding current trading prices, BZUN is priced at $3.40, while PRTS trades at $0.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZUN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.91, whereas PRTS's P/E ratio is -1.11. In terms of profitability, BZUN's ROE is -0.05%, compared to PRTS's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, BZUN is less volatile compared to PRTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZUN.
BZUN vs BBBY Comparison
BZUN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZUN stands at 184.21M. In comparison, BBBY has a market cap of 41.96M. Regarding current trading prices, BZUN is priced at $3.40, while BBBY trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZUN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.91, whereas BBBY's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, BZUN's ROE is -0.05%, compared to BBBY's ROE of +2.66%. Regarding short-term risk, BZUN is less volatile compared to BBBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZUN.
BZUN vs SSU Comparison
BZUN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZUN stands at 184.21M. In comparison, SSU has a market cap of 36.31M. Regarding current trading prices, BZUN is priced at $3.40, while SSU trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZUN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.91, whereas SSU's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, BZUN's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SSU's ROE of -1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BZUN is less volatile compared to SSU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZUN.
BZUN vs BGFV Comparison
BZUN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZUN stands at 184.21M. In comparison, BGFV has a market cap of 28.11M. Regarding current trading prices, BZUN is priced at $3.40, while BGFV trades at $1.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZUN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.91, whereas BGFV's P/E ratio is -0.35. In terms of profitability, BZUN's ROE is -0.05%, compared to BGFV's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, BZUN is less volatile compared to BGFV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZUN.
BZUN vs KIRK Comparison
BZUN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZUN stands at 184.21M. In comparison, KIRK has a market cap of 26.50M. Regarding current trading prices, BZUN is priced at $3.40, while KIRK trades at $1.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZUN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.91, whereas KIRK's P/E ratio is -0.67. In terms of profitability, BZUN's ROE is -0.05%, compared to KIRK's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, BZUN is less volatile compared to KIRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZUN.
BZUN vs TLF Comparison
BZUN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZUN stands at 184.21M. In comparison, TLF has a market cap of 24.01M. Regarding current trading prices, BZUN is priced at $3.40, while TLF trades at $2.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZUN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.91, whereas TLF's P/E ratio is 31.33. In terms of profitability, BZUN's ROE is -0.05%, compared to TLF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, BZUN is less volatile compared to TLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZUN.
BZUN vs YSG Comparison
BZUN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZUN stands at 184.21M. In comparison, YSG has a market cap of 23.29M. Regarding current trading prices, BZUN is priced at $3.40, while YSG trades at $5.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZUN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.91, whereas YSG's P/E ratio is -5.28. In terms of profitability, BZUN's ROE is -0.05%, compared to YSG's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, BZUN is less volatile compared to YSG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZUN.
BZUN vs CGTL Comparison
BZUN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZUN stands at 184.21M. In comparison, CGTL has a market cap of 21.21M. Regarding current trading prices, BZUN is priced at $3.40, while CGTL trades at $0.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZUN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.91, whereas CGTL's P/E ratio is 4.95. In terms of profitability, BZUN's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CGTL's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, BZUN is less volatile compared to CGTL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZUN.
BZUN vs IPW Comparison
BZUN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZUN stands at 184.21M. In comparison, IPW has a market cap of 19.50M. Regarding current trading prices, BZUN is priced at $3.40, while IPW trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZUN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.91, whereas IPW's P/E ratio is -8.86. In terms of profitability, BZUN's ROE is -0.05%, compared to IPW's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BZUN is less volatile compared to IPW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZUN.
BZUN vs JBDI Comparison
BZUN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZUN stands at 184.21M. In comparison, JBDI has a market cap of 18.05M. Regarding current trading prices, BZUN is priced at $3.40, while JBDI trades at $0.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZUN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.91, whereas JBDI's P/E ratio is -18.24. In terms of profitability, BZUN's ROE is -0.05%, compared to JBDI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BZUN is less volatile compared to JBDI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZUN.
BZUN vs ZOOZ Comparison
BZUN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZUN stands at 184.21M. In comparison, ZOOZ has a market cap of 16.34M. Regarding current trading prices, BZUN is priced at $3.40, while ZOOZ trades at $1.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZUN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.91, whereas ZOOZ's P/E ratio is -1.24. In terms of profitability, BZUN's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ZOOZ's ROE of -1.98%. Regarding short-term risk, BZUN is more volatile compared to ZOOZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZUN.
BZUN vs BOXD Comparison
BZUN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZUN stands at 184.21M. In comparison, BOXD has a market cap of 14.01M. Regarding current trading prices, BZUN is priced at $3.40, while BOXD trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZUN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.91, whereas BOXD's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, BZUN's ROE is -0.05%, compared to BOXD's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, BZUN is less volatile compared to BOXD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZUN.
BZUN vs ZKH Comparison
BZUN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZUN stands at 184.21M. In comparison, ZKH has a market cap of 13.51M. Regarding current trading prices, BZUN is priced at $3.40, while ZKH trades at $2.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZUN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.91, whereas ZKH's P/E ratio is -12.31. In terms of profitability, BZUN's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ZKH's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BZUN is more volatile compared to ZKH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZUN.
BZUN vs LITB Comparison
BZUN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZUN stands at 184.21M. In comparison, LITB has a market cap of 11.44M. Regarding current trading prices, BZUN is priced at $3.40, while LITB trades at $1.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZUN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.91, whereas LITB's P/E ratio is -10.37. In terms of profitability, BZUN's ROE is -0.05%, compared to LITB's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BZUN is less volatile compared to LITB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZUN.