Burcon NutraScience Corporation

BRCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRCN stands at 0. In comparison, KHC has a market cap of 32.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BRCN is priced at $0.44, while KHC trades at $27.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRCN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.67, whereas KHC's P/E ratio is -6.20. In terms of profitability, BRCN's ROE is N/A, compared to KHC's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BRCN is more volatile compared to KHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRCN.Check KHC's competition here

BRCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRCN stands at 0. In comparison, GIS has a market cap of 26.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BRCN is priced at $0.44, while GIS trades at $49.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRCN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.67, whereas GIS's P/E ratio is 12.11. In terms of profitability, BRCN's ROE is N/A, compared to GIS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, BRCN is more volatile compared to GIS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRCN.Check GIS's competition here

BRCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRCN stands at 0. In comparison, MKC-V has a market cap of 18.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BRCN is priced at $0.44, while MKC-V trades at $69.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRCN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.67, whereas MKC-V's P/E ratio is 24.36. In terms of profitability, BRCN's ROE is N/A, compared to MKC-V's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BRCN is more volatile compared to MKC-V. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRCN.Check MKC-V's competition here

BRCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRCN stands at 0. In comparison, MKC has a market cap of 18.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BRCN is priced at $0.44, while MKC trades at $70.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRCN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.67, whereas MKC's P/E ratio is 24.29. In terms of profitability, BRCN's ROE is N/A, compared to MKC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BRCN is more volatile compared to MKC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRCN.Check MKC's competition here

BRCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRCN stands at 0. In comparison, HRL has a market cap of 15.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BRCN is priced at $0.44, while HRL trades at $28.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRCN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.67, whereas HRL's P/E ratio is 20.94. In terms of profitability, BRCN's ROE is N/A, compared to HRL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BRCN is more volatile compared to HRL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRCN.Check HRL's competition here

BRCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRCN stands at 0. In comparison, SJM has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BRCN is priced at $0.44, while SJM trades at $111.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRCN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.67, whereas SJM's P/E ratio is -9.57. In terms of profitability, BRCN's ROE is N/A, compared to SJM's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BRCN is more volatile compared to SJM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRCN.Check SJM's competition here

BRCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRCN stands at 0. In comparison, PPC has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BRCN is priced at $0.44, while PPC trades at $47.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRCN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.67, whereas PPC's P/E ratio is 9.24. In terms of profitability, BRCN's ROE is N/A, compared to PPC's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, BRCN is more volatile compared to PPC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRCN.Check PPC's competition here

BRCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRCN stands at 0. In comparison, CPB has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BRCN is priced at $0.44, while CPB trades at $32.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRCN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.67, whereas CPB's P/E ratio is 21.67. In terms of profitability, BRCN's ROE is N/A, compared to CPB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BRCN is more volatile compared to CPB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRCN.Check CPB's competition here

BRCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRCN stands at 0. In comparison, CAG has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BRCN is priced at $0.44, while CAG trades at $19.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRCN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.67, whereas CAG's P/E ratio is 7.99. In terms of profitability, BRCN's ROE is N/A, compared to CAG's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BRCN is more volatile compared to CAG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRCN.Check CAG's competition here

BRCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRCN stands at 0. In comparison, INGR has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BRCN is priced at $0.44, while INGR trades at $126.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRCN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.67, whereas INGR's P/E ratio is 12.29. In terms of profitability, BRCN's ROE is N/A, compared to INGR's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BRCN is more volatile compared to INGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRCN.Check INGR's competition here

BRCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRCN stands at 0. In comparison, LW has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BRCN is priced at $0.44, while LW trades at $54.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRCN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.67, whereas LW's P/E ratio is 21.66. In terms of profitability, BRCN's ROE is N/A, compared to LW's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BRCN is more volatile compared to LW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRCN.Check LW's competition here

BRCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRCN stands at 0. In comparison, BRFS has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, BRCN is priced at $0.44, while BRFS trades at $3.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRCN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.67, whereas BRFS's P/E ratio is 8.58. In terms of profitability, BRCN's ROE is N/A, compared to BRFS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, BRCN is more volatile compared to BRFS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRCN.Check BRFS's competition here

BRCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRCN stands at 0. In comparison, POST has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BRCN is priced at $0.44, while POST trades at $108.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRCN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.67, whereas POST's P/E ratio is 18.46. In terms of profitability, BRCN's ROE is N/A, compared to POST's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BRCN is more volatile compared to POST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRCN.Check POST's competition here

BRCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRCN stands at 0. In comparison, DAR has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BRCN is priced at $0.44, while DAR trades at $30.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRCN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.67, whereas DAR's P/E ratio is 47.95. In terms of profitability, BRCN's ROE is N/A, compared to DAR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BRCN is more volatile compared to DAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRCN.Check DAR's competition here

BRCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRCN stands at 0. In comparison, BRBR has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BRCN is priced at $0.44, while BRBR trades at $38.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRCN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.67, whereas BRBR's P/E ratio is 21.91. In terms of profitability, BRCN's ROE is N/A, compared to BRBR's ROE of -1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BRCN is more volatile compared to BRBR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRCN.Check BRBR's competition here

BRCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRCN stands at 0. In comparison, LANC has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BRCN is priced at $0.44, while LANC trades at $172.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRCN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.67, whereas LANC's P/E ratio is 28.09. In terms of profitability, BRCN's ROE is N/A, compared to LANC's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BRCN is more volatile compared to LANC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRCN.Check LANC's competition here

BRCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRCN stands at 0. In comparison, TWNK has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BRCN is priced at $0.44, while TWNK trades at $33.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRCN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.67, whereas TWNK's P/E ratio is 26.64. In terms of profitability, BRCN's ROE is N/A, compared to TWNK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BRCN is more volatile compared to TWNK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRCN.Check TWNK's competition here

BRCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRCN stands at 0. In comparison, TWNKW has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BRCN is priced at $0.44, while TWNKW trades at $3.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRCN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.67, whereas TWNKW's P/E ratio is 5.15. In terms of profitability, BRCN's ROE is N/A, compared to TWNKW's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BRCN is less volatile compared to TWNKW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRCN.Check TWNKW's competition here

BRCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRCN stands at 0. In comparison, FLO has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BRCN is priced at $0.44, while FLO trades at $16.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRCN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.67, whereas FLO's P/E ratio is 14.54. In terms of profitability, BRCN's ROE is N/A, compared to FLO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BRCN is more volatile compared to FLO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRCN.Check FLO's competition here

BRCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRCN stands at 0. In comparison, FRPT has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, BRCN is priced at $0.44, while FRPT trades at $63.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRCN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.67, whereas FRPT's P/E ratio is 92.79. In terms of profitability, BRCN's ROE is N/A, compared to FRPT's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BRCN is more volatile compared to FRPT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRCN.Check FRPT's competition here

BRCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRCN stands at 0. In comparison, SMPL has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BRCN is priced at $0.44, while SMPL trades at $29.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRCN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.67, whereas SMPL's P/E ratio is 19.86. In terms of profitability, BRCN's ROE is N/A, compared to SMPL's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BRCN is more volatile compared to SMPL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRCN.Check SMPL's competition here

BRCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRCN stands at 0. In comparison, SOVO has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BRCN is priced at $0.44, while SOVO trades at $22.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRCN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.67, whereas SOVO's P/E ratio is 79.24. In terms of profitability, BRCN's ROE is N/A, compared to SOVO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BRCN is more volatile compared to SOVO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRCN.Check SOVO's competition here

BRCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRCN stands at 0. In comparison, NOMD has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BRCN is priced at $0.44, while NOMD trades at $15.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRCN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.67, whereas NOMD's P/E ratio is 9.70. In terms of profitability, BRCN's ROE is N/A, compared to NOMD's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BRCN is more volatile compared to NOMD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRCN.Check NOMD's competition here

BRCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRCN stands at 0. In comparison, JJSF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BRCN is priced at $0.44, while JJSF trades at $112.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRCN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.67, whereas JJSF's P/E ratio is 25.94. In terms of profitability, BRCN's ROE is N/A, compared to JJSF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BRCN is more volatile compared to JJSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRCN.Check JJSF's competition here

BRCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRCN stands at 0. In comparison, CENTA has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BRCN is priced at $0.44, while CENTA trades at $32.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRCN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.67, whereas CENTA's P/E ratio is 14.90. In terms of profitability, BRCN's ROE is N/A, compared to CENTA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BRCN is more volatile compared to CENTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRCN.Check CENTA's competition here

BRCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRCN stands at 0. In comparison, CENT has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BRCN is priced at $0.44, while CENT trades at $36.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRCN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.67, whereas CENT's P/E ratio is 16.43. In terms of profitability, BRCN's ROE is N/A, compared to CENT's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BRCN is more volatile compared to CENT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRCN.Check CENT's competition here

BRCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRCN stands at 0. In comparison, KLG has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, BRCN is priced at $0.44, while KLG trades at $23.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRCN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.67, whereas KLG's P/E ratio is 67.74. In terms of profitability, BRCN's ROE is N/A, compared to KLG's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BRCN is more volatile compared to KLG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRCN.Check KLG's competition here

BRCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRCN stands at 0. In comparison, UTZ has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BRCN is priced at $0.44, while UTZ trades at $13.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRCN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.67, whereas UTZ's P/E ratio is 61.57. In terms of profitability, BRCN's ROE is N/A, compared to UTZ's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BRCN is more volatile compared to UTZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRCN.Check UTZ's competition here

BRCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRCN stands at 0. In comparison, HLF has a market cap of 991.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BRCN is priced at $0.44, while HLF trades at $9.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRCN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.67, whereas HLF's P/E ratio is 3.02. In terms of profitability, BRCN's ROE is N/A, compared to HLF's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, BRCN is more volatile compared to HLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRCN.Check HLF's competition here

BRCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRCN stands at 0. In comparison, THS has a market cap of 916.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BRCN is priced at $0.44, while THS trades at $19.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRCN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.67, whereas THS's P/E ratio is 50.42. In terms of profitability, BRCN's ROE is N/A, compared to THS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BRCN is more volatile compared to THS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRCN.Check THS's competition here

BRCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRCN stands at 0. In comparison, JBSS has a market cap of 735.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BRCN is priced at $0.44, while JBSS trades at $62.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRCN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.67, whereas JBSS's P/E ratio is 13.24. In terms of profitability, BRCN's ROE is N/A, compared to JBSS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BRCN is more volatile compared to JBSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRCN.Check JBSS's competition here

BRCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRCN stands at 0. In comparison, STKL has a market cap of 724.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BRCN is priced at $0.44, while STKL trades at $6.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRCN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.67, whereas STKL's P/E ratio is -306.50. In terms of profitability, BRCN's ROE is N/A, compared to STKL's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BRCN is more volatile compared to STKL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRCN.Check STKL's competition here

BRCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRCN stands at 0. In comparison, SENEA has a market cap of 719M. Regarding current trading prices, BRCN is priced at $0.44, while SENEA trades at $104.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRCN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.67, whereas SENEA's P/E ratio is 16.72. In terms of profitability, BRCN's ROE is N/A, compared to SENEA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BRCN is more volatile compared to SENEA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRCN.Check SENEA's competition here

BRCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRCN stands at 0. In comparison, SENEB has a market cap of 710.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BRCN is priced at $0.44, while SENEB trades at $104.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRCN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.67, whereas SENEB's P/E ratio is 17.56. In terms of profitability, BRCN's ROE is N/A, compared to SENEB's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BRCN is more volatile compared to SENEB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRCN.Check SENEB's competition here

BRCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRCN stands at 0. In comparison, WEST has a market cap of 605.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BRCN is priced at $0.44, while WEST trades at $6.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRCN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.67, whereas WEST's P/E ratio is -6.87. In terms of profitability, BRCN's ROE is N/A, compared to WEST's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, BRCN is more volatile compared to WEST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRCN.Check WEST's competition here

BRCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRCN stands at 0. In comparison, USNA has a market cap of 555.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BRCN is priced at $0.44, while USNA trades at $30.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRCN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.67, whereas USNA's P/E ratio is 16.89. In terms of profitability, BRCN's ROE is N/A, compared to USNA's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BRCN is more volatile compared to USNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRCN.Check USNA's competition here

BRCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRCN stands at 0. In comparison, THRN has a market cap of 550.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BRCN is priced at $0.44, while THRN trades at $10.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRCN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.67, whereas THRN's P/E ratio is 26.13. In terms of profitability, BRCN's ROE is N/A, compared to THRN's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BRCN is more volatile compared to THRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRCN.Check THRN's competition here

BRCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRCN stands at 0. In comparison, LWAY has a market cap of 453.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BRCN is priced at $0.44, while LWAY trades at $29.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRCN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.67, whereas LWAY's P/E ratio is 42.57. In terms of profitability, BRCN's ROE is N/A, compared to LWAY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BRCN is more volatile compared to LWAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRCN.Check LWAY's competition here

BRCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRCN stands at 0. In comparison, BGS has a market cap of 337.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BRCN is priced at $0.44, while BGS trades at $4.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRCN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.67, whereas BGS's P/E ratio is -1.49. In terms of profitability, BRCN's ROE is N/A, compared to BGS's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, BRCN is more volatile compared to BGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRCN.Check BGS's competition here

BRCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRCN stands at 0. In comparison, BRCC has a market cap of 315.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BRCN is priced at $0.44, while BRCC trades at $1.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRCN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.67, whereas BRCC's P/E ratio is -10.79. In terms of profitability, BRCN's ROE is N/A, compared to BRCC's ROE of -1.67%. Regarding short-term risk, BRCN is more volatile compared to BRCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRCN.Check BRCC's competition here

BRCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRCN stands at 0. In comparison, MAMA has a market cap of 307.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BRCN is priced at $0.44, while MAMA trades at $8.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRCN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.67, whereas MAMA's P/E ratio is 74.27. In terms of profitability, BRCN's ROE is N/A, compared to MAMA's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BRCN is more volatile compared to MAMA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRCN.Check MAMA's competition here

BRCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRCN stands at 0. In comparison, NATR has a market cap of 291.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BRCN is priced at $0.44, while NATR trades at $16.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRCN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.67, whereas NATR's P/E ratio is 22.05. In terms of profitability, BRCN's ROE is N/A, compared to NATR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BRCN is more volatile compared to NATR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRCN.Check NATR's competition here

BRCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRCN stands at 0. In comparison, FREE has a market cap of 211.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BRCN is priced at $0.44, while FREE trades at $4.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRCN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.67, whereas FREE's P/E ratio is -8.54. In terms of profitability, BRCN's ROE is N/A, compared to FREE's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BRCN is more volatile compared to FREE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRCN.Check FREE's competition here

BRCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRCN stands at 0. In comparison, BYND has a market cap of 197.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BRCN is priced at $0.44, while BYND trades at $2.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRCN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.67, whereas BYND's P/E ratio is -1.21. In terms of profitability, BRCN's ROE is N/A, compared to BYND's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, BRCN is more volatile compared to BYND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRCN.Check BYND's competition here

BRCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRCN stands at 0. In comparison, LFVN has a market cap of 169.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BRCN is priced at $0.44, while LFVN trades at $13.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRCN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.67, whereas LFVN's P/E ratio is 19.27. In terms of profitability, BRCN's ROE is N/A, compared to LFVN's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, BRCN is more volatile compared to LFVN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRCN.Check LFVN's competition here

BRCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRCN stands at 0. In comparison, WESTW has a market cap of 168.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BRCN is priced at $0.44, while WESTW trades at $1.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRCN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.67, whereas WESTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BRCN's ROE is N/A, compared to WESTW's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, BRCN is less volatile compared to WESTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRCN.Check WESTW's competition here

BRCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRCN stands at 0. In comparison, HAIN has a market cap of 167M. Regarding current trading prices, BRCN is priced at $0.44, while HAIN trades at $1.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRCN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.67, whereas HAIN's P/E ratio is -0.64. In terms of profitability, BRCN's ROE is N/A, compared to HAIN's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, BRCN is less volatile compared to HAIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRCN.Check HAIN's competition here

BRCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRCN stands at 0. In comparison, FTLF has a market cap of 156M. Regarding current trading prices, BRCN is priced at $0.44, while FTLF trades at $16.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRCN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.67, whereas FTLF's P/E ratio is 18.46. In terms of profitability, BRCN's ROE is N/A, compared to FTLF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, BRCN is more volatile compared to FTLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRCN.Check FTLF's competition here

BRCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRCN stands at 0. In comparison, MMMB has a market cap of 136.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BRCN is priced at $0.44, while MMMB trades at $3.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRCN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.67, whereas MMMB's P/E ratio is 41.67. In terms of profitability, BRCN's ROE is N/A, compared to MMMB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BRCN is more volatile compared to MMMB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRCN.Check MMMB's competition here

BRCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRCN stands at 0. In comparison, PLIN has a market cap of 115.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BRCN is priced at $0.44, while PLIN trades at $1.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRCN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.67, whereas PLIN's P/E ratio is -0.83. In terms of profitability, BRCN's ROE is N/A, compared to PLIN's ROE of -4.43%. Regarding short-term risk, BRCN is less volatile compared to PLIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRCN.Check PLIN's competition here

BRCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRCN stands at 0. In comparison, ABVE has a market cap of 93.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BRCN is priced at $0.44, while ABVE trades at $2.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRCN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.67, whereas ABVE's P/E ratio is -1.04. In terms of profitability, BRCN's ROE is N/A, compared to ABVE's ROE of +6.22%. Regarding short-term risk, BRCN is less volatile compared to ABVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRCN.Check ABVE's competition here

BRCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRCN stands at 0. In comparison, ABVEW has a market cap of 92.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BRCN is priced at $0.44, while ABVEW trades at $0.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRCN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.67, whereas ABVEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BRCN's ROE is N/A, compared to ABVEW's ROE of +6.22%. Regarding short-term risk, BRCN is less volatile compared to ABVEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRCN.Check ABVEW's competition here

BRCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRCN stands at 0. In comparison, DDC has a market cap of 84.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BRCN is priced at $0.44, while DDC trades at $10.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRCN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.67, whereas DDC's P/E ratio is -4.43. In terms of profitability, BRCN's ROE is N/A, compared to DDC's ROE of -3.66%. Regarding short-term risk, BRCN is less volatile compared to DDC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRCN.Check DDC's competition here

BRCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRCN stands at 0. In comparison, WYHG has a market cap of 78M. Regarding current trading prices, BRCN is priced at $0.44, while WYHG trades at $1.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRCN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.67, whereas WYHG's P/E ratio is 8.16. In terms of profitability, BRCN's ROE is N/A, compared to WYHG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BRCN is less volatile compared to WYHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRCN.Check WYHG's competition here

BRCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRCN stands at 0. In comparison, BRID has a market cap of 68.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BRCN is priced at $0.44, while BRID trades at $7.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRCN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.67, whereas BRID's P/E ratio is -9.27. In terms of profitability, BRCN's ROE is N/A, compared to BRID's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BRCN is more volatile compared to BRID. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRCN.Check BRID's competition here

BRCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRCN stands at 0. In comparison, BRLS has a market cap of 66.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BRCN is priced at $0.44, while BRLS trades at $3.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRCN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.67, whereas BRLS's P/E ratio is -3.24. In terms of profitability, BRCN's ROE is N/A, compared to BRLS's ROE of -8.92%. Regarding short-term risk, BRCN is more volatile compared to BRLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRCN.Check BRLS's competition here

BRCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRCN stands at 0. In comparison, ATPC has a market cap of 63M. Regarding current trading prices, BRCN is priced at $0.44, while ATPC trades at $1.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRCN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.67, whereas ATPC's P/E ratio is -3.41. In terms of profitability, BRCN's ROE is N/A, compared to ATPC's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, BRCN is less volatile compared to ATPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRCN.Check ATPC's competition here

BRCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRCN stands at 0. In comparison, LSF has a market cap of 62.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BRCN is priced at $0.44, while LSF trades at $6.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRCN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.67, whereas LSF's P/E ratio is -58.30. In terms of profitability, BRCN's ROE is N/A, compared to LSF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BRCN is less volatile compared to LSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRCN.Check LSF's competition here

BRCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRCN stands at 0. In comparison, MITC has a market cap of 57.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BRCN is priced at $0.44, while MITC trades at $3.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRCN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.67, whereas MITC's P/E ratio is -2.15. In terms of profitability, BRCN's ROE is N/A, compared to MITC's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, BRCN is less volatile compared to MITC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRCN.Check MITC's competition here

BRCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRCN stands at 0. In comparison, PAVS has a market cap of 51.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BRCN is priced at $0.44, while PAVS trades at $0.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRCN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.67, whereas PAVS's P/E ratio is -9.62. In terms of profitability, BRCN's ROE is N/A, compared to PAVS's ROE of -1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BRCN is more volatile compared to PAVS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRCN.Check PAVS's competition here

BRCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRCN stands at 0. In comparison, FARM has a market cap of 37.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BRCN is priced at $0.44, while FARM trades at $1.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRCN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.67, whereas FARM's P/E ratio is -2.53. In terms of profitability, BRCN's ROE is N/A, compared to FARM's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, BRCN is more volatile compared to FARM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRCN.Check FARM's competition here

BRCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRCN stands at 0. In comparison, CLXT has a market cap of 31.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BRCN is priced at $0.44, while CLXT trades at $6.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRCN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.67, whereas CLXT's P/E ratio is -1.64. In terms of profitability, BRCN's ROE is N/A, compared to CLXT's ROE of -3.34%. Regarding short-term risk, BRCN is less volatile compared to CLXT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRCN.Check CLXT's competition here

BRCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRCN stands at 0. In comparison, HAPP has a market cap of 31.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BRCN is priced at $0.44, while HAPP trades at $4.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRCN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.67, whereas HAPP's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, BRCN's ROE is N/A, compared to HAPP's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, BRCN is more volatile compared to HAPP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRCN.Check HAPP's competition here

BRCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRCN stands at 0. In comparison, BTOG has a market cap of 29.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BRCN is priced at $0.44, while BTOG trades at $0.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRCN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.67, whereas BTOG's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, BRCN's ROE is N/A, compared to BTOG's ROE of -20.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BRCN is less volatile compared to BTOG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRCN.Check BTOG's competition here

BRCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRCN stands at 0. In comparison, JVA has a market cap of 24.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BRCN is priced at $0.44, while JVA trades at $4.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRCN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.67, whereas JVA's P/E ratio is 6.59. In terms of profitability, BRCN's ROE is N/A, compared to JVA's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BRCN is more volatile compared to JVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRCN.Check JVA's competition here

BRCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRCN stands at 0. In comparison, NAII has a market cap of 23.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BRCN is priced at $0.44, while NAII trades at $3.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRCN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.67, whereas NAII's P/E ratio is -2.76. In terms of profitability, BRCN's ROE is N/A, compared to NAII's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BRCN is more volatile compared to NAII. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRCN.Check NAII's competition here

BRCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRCN stands at 0. In comparison, NCRA has a market cap of 23.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BRCN is priced at $0.44, while NCRA trades at $1.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRCN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.67, whereas NCRA's P/E ratio is -9.68. In terms of profitability, BRCN's ROE is N/A, compared to NCRA's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, BRCN is less volatile compared to NCRA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRCN.Check NCRA's competition here

BRCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRCN stands at 0. In comparison, BOF has a market cap of 23.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BRCN is priced at $0.44, while BOF trades at $2.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRCN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.67, whereas BOF's P/E ratio is -3.21. In terms of profitability, BRCN's ROE is N/A, compared to BOF's ROE of -1.90%. Regarding short-term risk, BRCN is more volatile compared to BOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRCN.Check BOF's competition here

BRCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRCN stands at 0. In comparison, YGF has a market cap of 23.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BRCN is priced at $0.44, while YGF trades at $0.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRCN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.67, whereas YGF's P/E ratio is 5.24. In terms of profitability, BRCN's ROE is N/A, compared to YGF's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, BRCN is more volatile compared to YGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRCN.Check YGF's competition here

BRCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRCN stands at 0. In comparison, COOT has a market cap of 14.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BRCN is priced at $0.44, while COOT trades at $0.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRCN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.67, whereas COOT's P/E ratio is -0.66. In terms of profitability, BRCN's ROE is N/A, compared to COOT's ROE of +0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, BRCN is more volatile compared to COOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRCN.Check COOT's competition here

BRCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRCN stands at 0. In comparison, TTCF has a market cap of 13.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BRCN is priced at $0.44, while TTCF trades at $0.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRCN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.67, whereas TTCF's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, BRCN's ROE is N/A, compared to TTCF's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, BRCN is less volatile compared to TTCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRCN.Check TTCF's competition here

BRCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRCN stands at 0. In comparison, PLAG has a market cap of 13M. Regarding current trading prices, BRCN is priced at $0.44, while PLAG trades at $1.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRCN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.67, whereas PLAG's P/E ratio is -1.71. In terms of profitability, BRCN's ROE is N/A, compared to PLAG's ROE of -58.20%. Regarding short-term risk, BRCN is more volatile compared to PLAG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRCN.Check PLAG's competition here

BRCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRCN stands at 0. In comparison, PETZ has a market cap of 10.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BRCN is priced at $0.44, while PETZ trades at $0.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRCN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.67, whereas PETZ's P/E ratio is 4.95. In terms of profitability, BRCN's ROE is N/A, compared to PETZ's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BRCN is more volatile compared to PETZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRCN.Check PETZ's competition here

BRCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRCN stands at 0. In comparison, BON has a market cap of 9.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BRCN is priced at $0.44, while BON trades at $1.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRCN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.67, whereas BON's P/E ratio is 0.31. In terms of profitability, BRCN's ROE is N/A, compared to BON's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BRCN is more volatile compared to BON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRCN.Check BON's competition here

BRCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRCN stands at 0. In comparison, IMG has a market cap of 8.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BRCN is priced at $0.44, while IMG trades at $0.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRCN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.67, whereas IMG's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, BRCN's ROE is N/A, compared to IMG's ROE of +35.74%. Regarding short-term risk, BRCN is less volatile compared to IMG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRCN.Check IMG's competition here

BRCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRCN stands at 0. In comparison, SOWG has a market cap of 8.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BRCN is priced at $0.44, while SOWG trades at $0.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRCN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.67, whereas SOWG's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, BRCN's ROE is N/A, compared to SOWG's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, BRCN is less volatile compared to SOWG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRCN.Check SOWG's competition here

BRCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRCN stands at 0. In comparison, NUZE has a market cap of 6.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BRCN is priced at $0.44, while NUZE trades at $0.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRCN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.67, whereas NUZE's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, BRCN's ROE is N/A, compared to NUZE's ROE of +291.46%. Regarding short-term risk, BRCN is less volatile compared to NUZE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRCN.Check NUZE's competition here

BRCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRCN stands at 0. In comparison, HCWC has a market cap of 5.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BRCN is priced at $0.44, while HCWC trades at $0.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRCN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.67, whereas HCWC's P/E ratio is -0.97. In terms of profitability, BRCN's ROE is N/A, compared to HCWC's ROE of -1.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BRCN is more volatile compared to HCWC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRCN.Check HCWC's competition here

BRCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRCN stands at 0. In comparison, BTTR has a market cap of 5.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BRCN is priced at $0.44, while BTTR trades at $2.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRCN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.67, whereas BTTR's P/E ratio is -21.20. In terms of profitability, BRCN's ROE is N/A, compared to BTTR's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, BRCN is more volatile compared to BTTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRCN.Check BTTR's competition here

BRCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRCN stands at 0. In comparison, FREEW has a market cap of 2.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BRCN is priced at $0.44, while FREEW trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRCN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.67, whereas FREEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BRCN's ROE is N/A, compared to FREEW's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BRCN is more volatile compared to FREEW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRCN.Check FREEW's competition here

BRCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRCN stands at 0. In comparison, ORIS has a market cap of 2.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BRCN is priced at $0.44, while ORIS trades at $0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRCN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.67, whereas ORIS's P/E ratio is 0.70. In terms of profitability, BRCN's ROE is N/A, compared to ORIS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BRCN is less volatile compared to ORIS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRCN.Check ORIS's competition here

BRCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRCN stands at 0. In comparison, RGF has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BRCN is priced at $0.44, while RGF trades at $1.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRCN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.67, whereas RGF's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, BRCN's ROE is N/A, compared to RGF's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, BRCN is less volatile compared to RGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRCN.Check RGF's competition here

BRCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRCN stands at 0. In comparison, CYAN has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BRCN is priced at $0.44, while CYAN trades at $0.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRCN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.67, whereas CYAN's P/E ratio is -0.73. In terms of profitability, BRCN's ROE is N/A, compared to CYAN's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, BRCN is more volatile compared to CYAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRCN.Check CYAN's competition here

BRCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRCN stands at 0. In comparison, FAMI has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BRCN is priced at $0.44, while FAMI trades at $1.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRCN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.67, whereas FAMI's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, BRCN's ROE is N/A, compared to FAMI's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BRCN is more volatile compared to FAMI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRCN.Check FAMI's competition here

BRCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRCN stands at 0. In comparison, BRLSW has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BRCN is priced at $0.44, while BRLSW trades at $0.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRCN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.67, whereas BRLSW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BRCN's ROE is N/A, compared to BRLSW's ROE of -8.92%. Regarding short-term risk, BRCN is more volatile compared to BRLSW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRCN.Check BRLSW's competition here

BRCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRCN stands at 0. In comparison, SNAX has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BRCN is priced at $0.44, while SNAX trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRCN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.67, whereas SNAX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BRCN's ROE is N/A, compared to SNAX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BRCN is less volatile compared to SNAX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRCN.Check SNAX's competition here

BRCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRCN stands at 0. In comparison, STKH has a market cap of 751.9K. Regarding current trading prices, BRCN is priced at $0.44, while STKH trades at $0.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRCN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.67, whereas STKH's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, BRCN's ROE is N/A, compared to STKH's ROE of -1.44%. Regarding short-term risk, BRCN is more volatile compared to STKH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRCN.Check STKH's competition here

BRCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRCN stands at 0. In comparison, BSFC has a market cap of 462.8K. Regarding current trading prices, BRCN is priced at $0.44, while BSFC trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRCN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.67, whereas BSFC's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, BRCN's ROE is N/A, compared to BSFC's ROE of -5.91%. Regarding short-term risk, BRCN is less volatile compared to BSFC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRCN.Check BSFC's competition here

BRCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRCN stands at 0. In comparison, SMFL has a market cap of 44K. Regarding current trading prices, BRCN is priced at $0.44, while SMFL trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRCN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.67, whereas SMFL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BRCN's ROE is N/A, compared to SMFL's ROE of +5.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BRCN is less volatile compared to SMFL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRCN.Check SMFL's competition here

BRCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRCN stands at 0. In comparison, SNAXW has a market cap of 13.4K. Regarding current trading prices, BRCN is priced at $0.44, while SNAXW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRCN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.67, whereas SNAXW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, BRCN's ROE is N/A, compared to SNAXW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BRCN is more volatile compared to SNAXW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRCN.Check SNAXW's competition here

BRCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRCN stands at 0. In comparison, RIBT has a market cap of 1K. Regarding current trading prices, BRCN is priced at $0.44, while RIBT trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRCN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.67, whereas RIBT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BRCN's ROE is N/A, compared to RIBT's ROE of -1.81%. Regarding short-term risk, BRCN is more volatile compared to RIBT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRCN.Check RIBT's competition here

BRCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRCN stands at 0. In comparison, SAFM has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BRCN is priced at $0.44, while SAFM trades at $204.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRCN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.67, whereas SAFM's P/E ratio is 5.28. In terms of profitability, BRCN's ROE is N/A, compared to SAFM's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, BRCN is more volatile compared to SAFM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRCN.Check SAFM's competition here

BRCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRCN stands at 0. In comparison, VGFC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BRCN is priced at $0.44, while VGFC trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRCN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.67, whereas VGFC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BRCN's ROE is N/A, compared to VGFC's ROE of -1.70%. Regarding short-term risk, BRCN is more volatile compared to VGFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRCN.Check VGFC's competition here

BRCN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRCN stands at 0. In comparison, DTEA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BRCN is priced at $0.44, while DTEA trades at $0.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRCN currently has a P/E ratio of -6.67, whereas DTEA's P/E ratio is -1.44. In terms of profitability, BRCN's ROE is N/A, compared to DTEA's ROE of +9.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BRCN is more volatile compared to DTEA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRCN.Check DTEA's competition here