B&G Foods, Inc.
B&G Foods, Inc. BGS Peers
See (BGS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Packaged Foods Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BGS | $4.23 | +0.00% | 355.1M | -1.67 | -$2.66 | +17.12% |
| KHC | $25.82 | +0.00% | 31.5B | 12.15 | $2.19 | +6.01% |
| GIS | $51.81 | +0.00% | 29.1B | 12.97 | $4.10 | +4.51% |
| MKC | $75.82 | +0.00% | 20.7B | 26.89 | $2.87 | +2.25% |
| MKC-V | $75.51 | +0.00% | 20.6B | 26.94 | $2.87 | +2.25% |
| HRL | $30.25 | +0.00% | 16.9B | 22.57 | $1.36 | +3.73% |
| SJM | $98.20 | +0.00% | 11B | -8.90 | -$11.57 | +4.21% |
| PPC | $44.98 | +0.00% | 10.8B | 8.95 | $5.08 | +13.85% |
| CAG | $20.47 | +0.00% | 10B | 30.95 | $0.68 | +6.65% |
| CPB | $30.65 | +0.00% | 9.4B | 21.13 | $1.50 | +4.79% |
Stock Comparison
BGS vs KHC Comparison
BGS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BGS stands at 355.1M. In comparison, KHC has a market cap of 31.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BGS is priced at $4.23, while KHC trades at $25.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BGS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas KHC's P/E ratio is 12.15. In terms of profitability, BGS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to KHC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BGS is more volatile compared to KHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BGS.
BGS vs GIS Comparison
BGS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BGS stands at 355.1M. In comparison, GIS has a market cap of 29.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BGS is priced at $4.23, while GIS trades at $51.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BGS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas GIS's P/E ratio is 12.97. In terms of profitability, BGS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to GIS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, BGS is more volatile compared to GIS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BGS.
BGS vs MKC Comparison
BGS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BGS stands at 355.1M. In comparison, MKC has a market cap of 20.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BGS is priced at $4.23, while MKC trades at $75.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BGS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas MKC's P/E ratio is 26.89. In terms of profitability, BGS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to MKC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BGS is more volatile compared to MKC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BGS.
BGS vs MKC-V Comparison
BGS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BGS stands at 355.1M. In comparison, MKC-V has a market cap of 20.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BGS is priced at $4.23, while MKC-V trades at $75.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BGS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas MKC-V's P/E ratio is 26.94. In terms of profitability, BGS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to MKC-V's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BGS is more volatile compared to MKC-V. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BGS.
BGS vs HRL Comparison
BGS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BGS stands at 355.1M. In comparison, HRL has a market cap of 16.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BGS is priced at $4.23, while HRL trades at $30.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BGS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas HRL's P/E ratio is 22.57. In terms of profitability, BGS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to HRL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BGS is more volatile compared to HRL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BGS.
BGS vs SJM Comparison
BGS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BGS stands at 355.1M. In comparison, SJM has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, BGS is priced at $4.23, while SJM trades at $98.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BGS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas SJM's P/E ratio is -8.90. In terms of profitability, BGS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to SJM's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BGS is more volatile compared to SJM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BGS.
BGS vs PPC Comparison
BGS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BGS stands at 355.1M. In comparison, PPC has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BGS is priced at $4.23, while PPC trades at $44.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BGS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas PPC's P/E ratio is 8.95. In terms of profitability, BGS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to PPC's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, BGS is more volatile compared to PPC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BGS.
BGS vs CAG Comparison
BGS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BGS stands at 355.1M. In comparison, CAG has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, BGS is priced at $4.23, while CAG trades at $20.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BGS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas CAG's P/E ratio is 30.95. In terms of profitability, BGS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to CAG's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BGS is more volatile compared to CAG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BGS.
BGS vs CPB Comparison
BGS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BGS stands at 355.1M. In comparison, CPB has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BGS is priced at $4.23, while CPB trades at $30.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BGS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas CPB's P/E ratio is 21.13. In terms of profitability, BGS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to CPB's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BGS is more volatile compared to CPB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BGS.
BGS vs INGR Comparison
BGS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BGS stands at 355.1M. In comparison, INGR has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BGS is priced at $4.23, while INGR trades at $135.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BGS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas INGR's P/E ratio is 14.44. In terms of profitability, BGS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to INGR's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BGS is more volatile compared to INGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BGS.
BGS vs BRBR Comparison
BGS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BGS stands at 355.1M. In comparison, BRBR has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BGS is priced at $4.23, while BRBR trades at $57.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BGS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas BRBR's P/E ratio is 27.46. In terms of profitability, BGS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to BRBR's ROE of -1.32%. Regarding short-term risk, BGS is more volatile compared to BRBR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BGS.
BGS vs LW Comparison
BGS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BGS stands at 355.1M. In comparison, LW has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BGS is priced at $4.23, while LW trades at $51.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BGS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas LW's P/E ratio is 20.54. In terms of profitability, BGS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to LW's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BGS is less volatile compared to LW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BGS.
BGS vs POST Comparison
BGS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BGS stands at 355.1M. In comparison, POST has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BGS is priced at $4.23, while POST trades at $109.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BGS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas POST's P/E ratio is 19.77. In terms of profitability, BGS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to POST's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BGS is more volatile compared to POST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BGS.
BGS vs DAR Comparison
BGS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BGS stands at 355.1M. In comparison, DAR has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, BGS is priced at $4.23, while DAR trades at $37.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BGS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas DAR's P/E ratio is 35.61. In terms of profitability, BGS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to DAR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BGS is more volatile compared to DAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BGS.
BGS vs BRFS Comparison
BGS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BGS stands at 355.1M. In comparison, BRFS has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BGS is priced at $4.23, while BRFS trades at $3.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BGS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas BRFS's P/E ratio is 8.40. In terms of profitability, BGS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to BRFS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, BGS is more volatile compared to BRFS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BGS.
BGS vs LANC Comparison
BGS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BGS stands at 355.1M. In comparison, LANC has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BGS is priced at $4.23, while LANC trades at $172.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BGS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas LANC's P/E ratio is 28.09. In terms of profitability, BGS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to LANC's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BGS is more volatile compared to LANC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BGS.
BGS vs TWNK Comparison
BGS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BGS stands at 355.1M. In comparison, TWNK has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BGS is priced at $4.23, while TWNK trades at $33.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BGS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas TWNK's P/E ratio is 26.64. In terms of profitability, BGS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to TWNK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BGS is more volatile compared to TWNK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BGS.
BGS vs TWNKW Comparison
BGS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BGS stands at 355.1M. In comparison, TWNKW has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BGS is priced at $4.23, while TWNKW trades at $3.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BGS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas TWNKW's P/E ratio is 5.15. In terms of profitability, BGS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to TWNKW's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BGS is less volatile compared to TWNKW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BGS.
BGS vs FRPT Comparison
BGS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BGS stands at 355.1M. In comparison, FRPT has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BGS is priced at $4.23, while FRPT trades at $67.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BGS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas FRPT's P/E ratio is 237.60. In terms of profitability, BGS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to FRPT's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BGS is more volatile compared to FRPT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BGS.
BGS vs FLO Comparison
BGS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BGS stands at 355.1M. In comparison, FLO has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BGS is priced at $4.23, while FLO trades at $15.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BGS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas FLO's P/E ratio is 15.02. In terms of profitability, BGS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to FLO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BGS is more volatile compared to FLO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BGS.
BGS vs SMPL Comparison
BGS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BGS stands at 355.1M. In comparison, SMPL has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BGS is priced at $4.23, while SMPL trades at $31.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BGS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas SMPL's P/E ratio is 22.52. In terms of profitability, BGS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to SMPL's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BGS is more volatile compared to SMPL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BGS.
BGS vs NOMD Comparison
BGS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BGS stands at 355.1M. In comparison, NOMD has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BGS is priced at $4.23, while NOMD trades at $16.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BGS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas NOMD's P/E ratio is 10.81. In terms of profitability, BGS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to NOMD's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BGS is more volatile compared to NOMD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BGS.
BGS vs SOVO Comparison
BGS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BGS stands at 355.1M. In comparison, SOVO has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BGS is priced at $4.23, while SOVO trades at $22.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BGS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas SOVO's P/E ratio is 79.24. In terms of profitability, BGS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to SOVO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BGS is more volatile compared to SOVO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BGS.
BGS vs JJSF Comparison
BGS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BGS stands at 355.1M. In comparison, JJSF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BGS is priced at $4.23, while JJSF trades at $113.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BGS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas JJSF's P/E ratio is 30.40. In terms of profitability, BGS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to JJSF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BGS is more volatile compared to JJSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BGS.
BGS vs CENTA Comparison
BGS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BGS stands at 355.1M. In comparison, CENTA has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BGS is priced at $4.23, while CENTA trades at $31.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BGS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas CENTA's P/E ratio is 17.07. In terms of profitability, BGS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to CENTA's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BGS is more volatile compared to CENTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BGS.
BGS vs CENT Comparison
BGS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BGS stands at 355.1M. In comparison, CENT has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BGS is priced at $4.23, while CENT trades at $35.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BGS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas CENT's P/E ratio is 19.19. In terms of profitability, BGS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to CENT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BGS is more volatile compared to CENT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BGS.
BGS vs KLG Comparison
BGS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BGS stands at 355.1M. In comparison, KLG has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BGS is priced at $4.23, while KLG trades at $15.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BGS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas KLG's P/E ratio is 26.22. In terms of profitability, BGS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to KLG's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BGS is more volatile compared to KLG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BGS.
BGS vs UTZ Comparison
BGS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BGS stands at 355.1M. In comparison, UTZ has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BGS is priced at $4.23, while UTZ trades at $12.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BGS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas UTZ's P/E ratio is 39.91. In terms of profitability, BGS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to UTZ's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BGS is more volatile compared to UTZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BGS.
BGS vs THS Comparison
BGS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BGS stands at 355.1M. In comparison, THS has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BGS is priced at $4.23, while THS trades at $19.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BGS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas THS's P/E ratio is 207.99. In terms of profitability, BGS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to THS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BGS is more volatile compared to THS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BGS.
BGS vs HLF Comparison
BGS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BGS stands at 355.1M. In comparison, HLF has a market cap of 943.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BGS is priced at $4.23, while HLF trades at $8.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BGS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas HLF's P/E ratio is 3.37. In terms of profitability, BGS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to HLF's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, BGS is more volatile compared to HLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BGS.
BGS vs JBSS Comparison
BGS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BGS stands at 355.1M. In comparison, JBSS has a market cap of 779.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BGS is priced at $4.23, while JBSS trades at $63.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BGS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas JBSS's P/E ratio is 14.04. In terms of profitability, BGS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to JBSS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BGS is more volatile compared to JBSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BGS.
BGS vs SENEA Comparison
BGS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BGS stands at 355.1M. In comparison, SENEA has a market cap of 718.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BGS is priced at $4.23, while SENEA trades at $101.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BGS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas SENEA's P/E ratio is 17.58. In terms of profitability, BGS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to SENEA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BGS is more volatile compared to SENEA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BGS.
BGS vs STKL Comparison
BGS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BGS stands at 355.1M. In comparison, STKL has a market cap of 705.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BGS is priced at $4.23, while STKL trades at $5.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BGS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas STKL's P/E ratio is -66.67. In terms of profitability, BGS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to STKL's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BGS is more volatile compared to STKL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BGS.
BGS vs SENEB Comparison
BGS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BGS stands at 355.1M. In comparison, SENEB has a market cap of 704.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BGS is priced at $4.23, while SENEB trades at $101.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BGS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas SENEB's P/E ratio is 17.63. In terms of profitability, BGS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to SENEB's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BGS is more volatile compared to SENEB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BGS.
BGS vs USNA Comparison
BGS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BGS stands at 355.1M. In comparison, USNA has a market cap of 594.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BGS is priced at $4.23, while USNA trades at $30.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BGS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas USNA's P/E ratio is 17.54. In terms of profitability, BGS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to USNA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BGS is more volatile compared to USNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BGS.
BGS vs WEST Comparison
BGS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BGS stands at 355.1M. In comparison, WEST has a market cap of 562.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BGS is priced at $4.23, while WEST trades at $5.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BGS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas WEST's P/E ratio is -6.53. In terms of profitability, BGS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to WEST's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, BGS is less volatile compared to WEST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BGS.
BGS vs THRN Comparison
BGS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BGS stands at 355.1M. In comparison, THRN has a market cap of 550.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BGS is priced at $4.23, while THRN trades at $10.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BGS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas THRN's P/E ratio is 26.13. In terms of profitability, BGS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to THRN's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BGS is more volatile compared to THRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BGS.
BGS vs LWAY Comparison
BGS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BGS stands at 355.1M. In comparison, LWAY has a market cap of 378.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BGS is priced at $4.23, while LWAY trades at $24.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BGS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas LWAY's P/E ratio is 37.18. In terms of profitability, BGS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to LWAY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BGS is more volatile compared to LWAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BGS.
BGS vs MAMA Comparison
BGS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BGS stands at 355.1M. In comparison, MAMA has a market cap of 325M. Regarding current trading prices, BGS is priced at $4.23, while MAMA trades at $8.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BGS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas MAMA's P/E ratio is 78.55. In terms of profitability, BGS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to MAMA's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BGS is more volatile compared to MAMA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BGS.
BGS vs BRCC Comparison
BGS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BGS stands at 355.1M. In comparison, BRCC has a market cap of 323.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BGS is priced at $4.23, while BRCC trades at $1.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BGS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas BRCC's P/E ratio is -16.78. In terms of profitability, BGS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to BRCC's ROE of -0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, BGS is less volatile compared to BRCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BGS.
BGS vs NATR Comparison
BGS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BGS stands at 355.1M. In comparison, NATR has a market cap of 274.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BGS is priced at $4.23, while NATR trades at $14.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BGS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas NATR's P/E ratio is 28.02. In terms of profitability, BGS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to NATR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BGS is more volatile compared to NATR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BGS.
BGS vs BYND Comparison
BGS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BGS stands at 355.1M. In comparison, BYND has a market cap of 263.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BGS is priced at $4.23, while BYND trades at $3.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BGS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas BYND's P/E ratio is -1.51. In terms of profitability, BGS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to BYND's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, BGS is less volatile compared to BYND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BGS.
BGS vs FREE Comparison
BGS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BGS stands at 355.1M. In comparison, FREE has a market cap of 211.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BGS is priced at $4.23, while FREE trades at $4.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BGS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas FREE's P/E ratio is -8.54. In terms of profitability, BGS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to FREE's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BGS is more volatile compared to FREE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BGS.
BGS vs LFVN Comparison
BGS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BGS stands at 355.1M. In comparison, LFVN has a market cap of 168.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BGS is priced at $4.23, while LFVN trades at $13.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BGS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas LFVN's P/E ratio is 19.13. In terms of profitability, BGS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to LFVN's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, BGS is less volatile compared to LFVN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BGS.
BGS vs WESTW Comparison
BGS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BGS stands at 355.1M. In comparison, WESTW has a market cap of 168.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BGS is priced at $4.23, while WESTW trades at $1.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BGS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas WESTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BGS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to WESTW's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, BGS is less volatile compared to WESTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BGS.
BGS vs HAIN Comparison
BGS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BGS stands at 355.1M. In comparison, HAIN has a market cap of 149.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BGS is priced at $4.23, while HAIN trades at $1.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BGS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas HAIN's P/E ratio is -0.57. In terms of profitability, BGS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to HAIN's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, BGS is less volatile compared to HAIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BGS.
BGS vs MMMB Comparison
BGS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BGS stands at 355.1M. In comparison, MMMB has a market cap of 136.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BGS is priced at $4.23, while MMMB trades at $3.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BGS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas MMMB's P/E ratio is 41.67. In terms of profitability, BGS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to MMMB's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BGS is less volatile compared to MMMB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BGS.
BGS vs FTLF Comparison
BGS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BGS stands at 355.1M. In comparison, FTLF has a market cap of 132.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BGS is priced at $4.23, while FTLF trades at $13.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BGS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas FTLF's P/E ratio is 15.71. In terms of profitability, BGS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to FTLF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, BGS is less volatile compared to FTLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BGS.
BGS vs PLIN Comparison
BGS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BGS stands at 355.1M. In comparison, PLIN has a market cap of 115.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BGS is priced at $4.23, while PLIN trades at $1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BGS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas PLIN's P/E ratio is -0.83. In terms of profitability, BGS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to PLIN's ROE of -4.43%. Regarding short-term risk, BGS is less volatile compared to PLIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BGS.
BGS vs ABVEW Comparison
BGS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BGS stands at 355.1M. In comparison, ABVEW has a market cap of 78.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BGS is priced at $4.23, while ABVEW trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BGS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas ABVEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BGS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to ABVEW's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BGS is more volatile compared to ABVEW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BGS.
BGS vs BRLS Comparison
BGS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BGS stands at 355.1M. In comparison, BRLS has a market cap of 76.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BGS is priced at $4.23, while BRLS trades at $3.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BGS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas BRLS's P/E ratio is -3.74. In terms of profitability, BGS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to BRLS's ROE of -8.92%. Regarding short-term risk, BGS is less volatile compared to BRLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BGS.
BGS vs BRID Comparison
BGS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BGS stands at 355.1M. In comparison, BRID has a market cap of 70.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BGS is priced at $4.23, while BRID trades at $7.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BGS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas BRID's P/E ratio is -9.64. In terms of profitability, BGS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to BRID's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BGS is more volatile compared to BRID. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BGS.
BGS vs WYHG Comparison
BGS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BGS stands at 355.1M. In comparison, WYHG has a market cap of 70M. Regarding current trading prices, BGS is priced at $4.23, while WYHG trades at $1.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BGS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas WYHG's P/E ratio is 7.32. In terms of profitability, BGS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to WYHG's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BGS is less volatile compared to WYHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BGS.
BGS vs LSF Comparison
BGS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BGS stands at 355.1M. In comparison, LSF has a market cap of 67.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BGS is priced at $4.23, while LSF trades at $6.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BGS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas LSF's P/E ratio is -70.89. In terms of profitability, BGS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to LSF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BGS is less volatile compared to LSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BGS.
BGS vs ATPC Comparison
BGS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BGS stands at 355.1M. In comparison, ATPC has a market cap of 66.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BGS is priced at $4.23, while ATPC trades at $1.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BGS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas ATPC's P/E ratio is -2.56. In terms of profitability, BGS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to ATPC's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, BGS is less volatile compared to ATPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BGS.
BGS vs PAVS Comparison
BGS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BGS stands at 355.1M. In comparison, PAVS has a market cap of 61.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BGS is priced at $4.23, while PAVS trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BGS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas PAVS's P/E ratio is -0.27. In terms of profitability, BGS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to PAVS's ROE of -2.87%. Regarding short-term risk, BGS is more volatile compared to PAVS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BGS.
BGS vs MITC Comparison
BGS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BGS stands at 355.1M. In comparison, MITC has a market cap of 57.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BGS is priced at $4.23, while MITC trades at $3.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BGS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas MITC's P/E ratio is -2.15. In terms of profitability, BGS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to MITC's ROE of -1.20%. Regarding short-term risk, BGS is less volatile compared to MITC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BGS.
BGS vs ABVE Comparison
BGS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BGS stands at 355.1M. In comparison, ABVE has a market cap of 50.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BGS is priced at $4.23, while ABVE trades at $1.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BGS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas ABVE's P/E ratio is -0.56. In terms of profitability, BGS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to ABVE's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BGS is less volatile compared to ABVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BGS.
BGS vs DDC Comparison
BGS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BGS stands at 355.1M. In comparison, DDC has a market cap of 34.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BGS is priced at $4.23, while DDC trades at $10.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BGS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas DDC's P/E ratio is -4.75. In terms of profitability, BGS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to DDC's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BGS is less volatile compared to DDC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BGS.
BGS vs CLXT Comparison
BGS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BGS stands at 355.1M. In comparison, CLXT has a market cap of 31.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BGS is priced at $4.23, while CLXT trades at $6.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BGS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas CLXT's P/E ratio is -1.64. In terms of profitability, BGS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to CLXT's ROE of -3.34%. Regarding short-term risk, BGS is less volatile compared to CLXT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BGS.
BGS vs HAPP Comparison
BGS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BGS stands at 355.1M. In comparison, HAPP has a market cap of 31.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BGS is priced at $4.23, while HAPP trades at $4.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BGS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas HAPP's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, BGS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to HAPP's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, BGS is more volatile compared to HAPP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BGS.
BGS vs FARM Comparison
BGS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BGS stands at 355.1M. In comparison, FARM has a market cap of 30M. Regarding current trading prices, BGS is priced at $4.23, while FARM trades at $1.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BGS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas FARM's P/E ratio is -2.04. In terms of profitability, BGS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to FARM's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, BGS is more volatile compared to FARM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BGS.
BGS vs BOF Comparison
BGS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BGS stands at 355.1M. In comparison, BOF has a market cap of 24.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BGS is priced at $4.23, while BOF trades at $2.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BGS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas BOF's P/E ratio is -3.82. In terms of profitability, BGS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to BOF's ROE of -1.90%. Regarding short-term risk, BGS is less volatile compared to BOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BGS.
BGS vs JVA Comparison
BGS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BGS stands at 355.1M. In comparison, JVA has a market cap of 24.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BGS is priced at $4.23, while JVA trades at $4.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BGS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas JVA's P/E ratio is 6.64. In terms of profitability, BGS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to JVA's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BGS is more volatile compared to JVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BGS.
BGS vs YGF Comparison
BGS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BGS stands at 355.1M. In comparison, YGF has a market cap of 23.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BGS is priced at $4.23, while YGF trades at $0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BGS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas YGF's P/E ratio is 5.24. In terms of profitability, BGS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to YGF's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, BGS is more volatile compared to YGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BGS.
BGS vs COOT Comparison
BGS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BGS stands at 355.1M. In comparison, COOT has a market cap of 20.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BGS is priced at $4.23, while COOT trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BGS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas COOT's P/E ratio is -0.94. In terms of profitability, BGS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to COOT's ROE of +0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, BGS is less volatile compared to COOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BGS.
BGS vs NAII Comparison
BGS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BGS stands at 355.1M. In comparison, NAII has a market cap of 20.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BGS is priced at $4.23, while NAII trades at $3.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BGS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas NAII's P/E ratio is -2.35. In terms of profitability, BGS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to NAII's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BGS is more volatile compared to NAII. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BGS.
BGS vs NCRA Comparison
BGS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BGS stands at 355.1M. In comparison, NCRA has a market cap of 14.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BGS is priced at $4.23, while NCRA trades at $1.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BGS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas NCRA's P/E ratio is -5.94. In terms of profitability, BGS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to NCRA's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, BGS is less volatile compared to NCRA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BGS.
BGS vs ORIS Comparison
BGS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BGS stands at 355.1M. In comparison, ORIS has a market cap of 13.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BGS is priced at $4.23, while ORIS trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BGS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas ORIS's P/E ratio is 3.68. In terms of profitability, BGS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to ORIS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BGS is less volatile compared to ORIS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BGS.
BGS vs STKH Comparison
BGS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BGS stands at 355.1M. In comparison, STKH has a market cap of 13.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BGS is priced at $4.23, while STKH trades at $1.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BGS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas STKH's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, BGS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to STKH's ROE of -1.44%. Regarding short-term risk, BGS is less volatile compared to STKH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BGS.
BGS vs TTCF Comparison
BGS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BGS stands at 355.1M. In comparison, TTCF has a market cap of 13.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BGS is priced at $4.23, while TTCF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BGS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas TTCF's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, BGS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to TTCF's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, BGS is less volatile compared to TTCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BGS.
BGS vs PETZ Comparison
BGS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BGS stands at 355.1M. In comparison, PETZ has a market cap of 10.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BGS is priced at $4.23, while PETZ trades at $0.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BGS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas PETZ's P/E ratio is 4.94. In terms of profitability, BGS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to PETZ's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BGS is less volatile compared to PETZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BGS.
BGS vs IMG Comparison
BGS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BGS stands at 355.1M. In comparison, IMG has a market cap of 10.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BGS is priced at $4.23, while IMG trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BGS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas IMG's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, BGS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to IMG's ROE of -72.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BGS is less volatile compared to IMG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BGS.
BGS vs SOWG Comparison
BGS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BGS stands at 355.1M. In comparison, SOWG has a market cap of 9.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BGS is priced at $4.23, while SOWG trades at $0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BGS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas SOWG's P/E ratio is -1.18. In terms of profitability, BGS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to SOWG's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BGS is less volatile compared to SOWG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BGS.
BGS vs BON Comparison
BGS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BGS stands at 355.1M. In comparison, BON has a market cap of 8.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BGS is priced at $4.23, while BON trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BGS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas BON's P/E ratio is 0.29. In terms of profitability, BGS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to BON's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BGS is less volatile compared to BON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BGS.
BGS vs HCWC Comparison
BGS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BGS stands at 355.1M. In comparison, HCWC has a market cap of 8.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BGS is priced at $4.23, while HCWC trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BGS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas HCWC's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, BGS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to HCWC's ROE of -1.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BGS is less volatile compared to HCWC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BGS.
BGS vs NUZE Comparison
BGS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BGS stands at 355.1M. In comparison, NUZE has a market cap of 6.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BGS is priced at $4.23, while NUZE trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BGS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas NUZE's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, BGS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to NUZE's ROE of -70.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BGS is less volatile compared to NUZE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BGS.
BGS vs PLAG Comparison
BGS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BGS stands at 355.1M. In comparison, PLAG has a market cap of 6.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BGS is priced at $4.23, while PLAG trades at $0.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BGS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas PLAG's P/E ratio is -0.88. In terms of profitability, BGS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to PLAG's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, BGS is less volatile compared to PLAG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BGS.
BGS vs BTTR Comparison
BGS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BGS stands at 355.1M. In comparison, BTTR has a market cap of 5.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BGS is priced at $4.23, while BTTR trades at $2.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BGS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas BTTR's P/E ratio is -21.20. In terms of profitability, BGS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to BTTR's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, BGS is less volatile compared to BTTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BGS.
BGS vs CYAN Comparison
BGS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BGS stands at 355.1M. In comparison, CYAN has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BGS is priced at $4.23, while CYAN trades at $0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BGS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas CYAN's P/E ratio is -0.89. In terms of profitability, BGS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to CYAN's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, BGS is less volatile compared to CYAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BGS.
BGS vs FREEW Comparison
BGS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BGS stands at 355.1M. In comparison, FREEW has a market cap of 2.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BGS is priced at $4.23, while FREEW trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BGS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas FREEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BGS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to FREEW's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BGS is less volatile compared to FREEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BGS.
BGS vs BRLSW Comparison
BGS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BGS stands at 355.1M. In comparison, BRLSW has a market cap of 2.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BGS is priced at $4.23, while BRLSW trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BGS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas BRLSW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BGS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to BRLSW's ROE of -8.92%. Regarding short-term risk, BGS is less volatile compared to BRLSW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BGS.
BGS vs RGF Comparison
BGS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BGS stands at 355.1M. In comparison, RGF has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BGS is priced at $4.23, while RGF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BGS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas RGF's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, BGS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to RGF's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, BGS is more volatile compared to RGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BGS.
BGS vs FAMI Comparison
BGS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BGS stands at 355.1M. In comparison, FAMI has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BGS is priced at $4.23, while FAMI trades at $1.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BGS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas FAMI's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, BGS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to FAMI's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BGS is less volatile compared to FAMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BGS.
BGS vs BTOG Comparison
BGS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BGS stands at 355.1M. In comparison, BTOG has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BGS is priced at $4.23, while BTOG trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BGS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas BTOG's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, BGS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to BTOG's ROE of -6.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BGS is less volatile compared to BTOG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BGS.
BGS vs SNAX Comparison
BGS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BGS stands at 355.1M. In comparison, SNAX has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BGS is priced at $4.23, while SNAX trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BGS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas SNAX's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, BGS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to SNAX's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BGS is less volatile compared to SNAX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BGS.
BGS vs BSFC Comparison
BGS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BGS stands at 355.1M. In comparison, BSFC has a market cap of 816.3K. Regarding current trading prices, BGS is priced at $4.23, while BSFC trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BGS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas BSFC's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, BGS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to BSFC's ROE of -1.35%. Regarding short-term risk, BGS is less volatile compared to BSFC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BGS.
BGS vs SMFL Comparison
BGS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BGS stands at 355.1M. In comparison, SMFL has a market cap of 107.8K. Regarding current trading prices, BGS is priced at $4.23, while SMFL trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BGS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas SMFL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BGS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to SMFL's ROE of +5.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BGS is less volatile compared to SMFL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BGS.
BGS vs SNAXW Comparison
BGS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BGS stands at 355.1M. In comparison, SNAXW has a market cap of 15K. Regarding current trading prices, BGS is priced at $4.23, while SNAXW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BGS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas SNAXW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, BGS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to SNAXW's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BGS is more volatile compared to SNAXW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BGS.
BGS vs RIBT Comparison
BGS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BGS stands at 355.1M. In comparison, RIBT has a market cap of 1K. Regarding current trading prices, BGS is priced at $4.23, while RIBT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BGS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas RIBT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BGS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to RIBT's ROE of +1.36%. Regarding short-term risk, BGS is more volatile compared to RIBT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BGS.
BGS vs DTEA Comparison
BGS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BGS stands at 355.1M. In comparison, DTEA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BGS is priced at $4.23, while DTEA trades at $0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BGS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas DTEA's P/E ratio is -1.44. In terms of profitability, BGS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to DTEA's ROE of +9.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BGS is less volatile compared to DTEA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BGS.
BGS vs VGFC Comparison
BGS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BGS stands at 355.1M. In comparison, VGFC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BGS is priced at $4.23, while VGFC trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BGS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas VGFC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BGS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to VGFC's ROE of -1.70%. Regarding short-term risk, BGS is less volatile compared to VGFC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BGS.
BGS vs SAFM Comparison
BGS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BGS stands at 355.1M. In comparison, SAFM has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BGS is priced at $4.23, while SAFM trades at $204.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BGS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas SAFM's P/E ratio is 5.28. In terms of profitability, BGS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to SAFM's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, BGS is more volatile compared to SAFM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BGS.
BGS vs BRCN Comparison
BGS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BGS stands at 355.1M. In comparison, BRCN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BGS is priced at $4.23, while BRCN trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BGS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas BRCN's P/E ratio is -6.67. In terms of profitability, BGS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to BRCN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BGS is less volatile compared to BRCN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BGS.