B&G Foods, Inc.
B&G Foods, Inc. (BGS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (BGS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Packaged Foods Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BGS | $4.51 | +2.27% | 360.3M | -1.70 | -$2.66 | +16.93% |
| KHC | $28.68 | -0.35% | 33.9B | 13.10 | $2.19 | +5.58% |
| GIS | $51.07 | +0.24% | 27.7B | 12.46 | $4.10 | +4.72% |
| MKC-V | $71.60 | -0.06% | 19.2B | 24.95 | $2.87 | +2.47% |
| MKC | $71.57 | +0.17% | 19.2B | 24.95 | $2.87 | +2.47% |
| HRL | $29.24 | -0.20% | 16.1B | 21.51 | $1.36 | +3.94% |
| SJM | $109.02 | +0.35% | 11.6B | -9.43 | -$11.57 | +3.97% |
| PPC | $47.85 | +1.18% | 11.3B | 9.42 | $5.08 | +13.23% |
| CPB | $32.66 | -0.31% | 9.7B | 21.77 | $1.50 | +4.72% |
| CAG | $19.21 | -0.47% | 9.2B | 8.01 | $2.40 | +7.27% |
Stock Comparison
BGS vs KHC Comparison July 2025
BGS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BGS stands at 360.3M. In comparison, KHC has a market cap of 33.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BGS is priced at $4.51, while KHC trades at $28.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BGS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.70, whereas KHC's P/E ratio is 13.10. In terms of profitability, BGS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to KHC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BGS is more volatile compared to KHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BGS.Check KHC's competition here
BGS vs GIS Comparison July 2025
BGS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BGS stands at 360.3M. In comparison, GIS has a market cap of 27.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BGS is priced at $4.51, while GIS trades at $51.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BGS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.70, whereas GIS's P/E ratio is 12.46. In terms of profitability, BGS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to GIS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, BGS is more volatile compared to GIS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BGS.Check GIS's competition here
BGS vs MKC-V Comparison July 2025
BGS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BGS stands at 360.3M. In comparison, MKC-V has a market cap of 19.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BGS is priced at $4.51, while MKC-V trades at $71.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BGS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.70, whereas MKC-V's P/E ratio is 24.95. In terms of profitability, BGS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to MKC-V's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BGS is more volatile compared to MKC-V. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BGS.Check MKC-V's competition here
BGS vs MKC Comparison July 2025
BGS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BGS stands at 360.3M. In comparison, MKC has a market cap of 19.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BGS is priced at $4.51, while MKC trades at $71.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BGS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.70, whereas MKC's P/E ratio is 24.95. In terms of profitability, BGS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to MKC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BGS is more volatile compared to MKC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BGS.Check MKC's competition here
BGS vs HRL Comparison July 2025
BGS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BGS stands at 360.3M. In comparison, HRL has a market cap of 16.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BGS is priced at $4.51, while HRL trades at $29.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BGS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.70, whereas HRL's P/E ratio is 21.51. In terms of profitability, BGS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to HRL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BGS is more volatile compared to HRL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BGS.Check HRL's competition here
BGS vs SJM Comparison July 2025
BGS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BGS stands at 360.3M. In comparison, SJM has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BGS is priced at $4.51, while SJM trades at $109.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BGS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.70, whereas SJM's P/E ratio is -9.43. In terms of profitability, BGS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to SJM's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BGS is more volatile compared to SJM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BGS.Check SJM's competition here
BGS vs PPC Comparison July 2025
BGS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BGS stands at 360.3M. In comparison, PPC has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BGS is priced at $4.51, while PPC trades at $47.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BGS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.70, whereas PPC's P/E ratio is 9.42. In terms of profitability, BGS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to PPC's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, BGS is more volatile compared to PPC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BGS.Check PPC's competition here
BGS vs CPB Comparison July 2025
BGS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BGS stands at 360.3M. In comparison, CPB has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BGS is priced at $4.51, while CPB trades at $32.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BGS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.70, whereas CPB's P/E ratio is 21.77. In terms of profitability, BGS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to CPB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BGS is more volatile compared to CPB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BGS.Check CPB's competition here
BGS vs CAG Comparison July 2025
BGS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BGS stands at 360.3M. In comparison, CAG has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BGS is priced at $4.51, while CAG trades at $19.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BGS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.70, whereas CAG's P/E ratio is 8.01. In terms of profitability, BGS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to CAG's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BGS is more volatile compared to CAG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BGS.Check CAG's competition here
BGS vs INGR Comparison July 2025
BGS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BGS stands at 360.3M. In comparison, INGR has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BGS is priced at $4.51, while INGR trades at $133.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BGS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.70, whereas INGR's P/E ratio is 14.04. In terms of profitability, BGS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to INGR's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BGS is more volatile compared to INGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BGS.Check INGR's competition here
BGS vs LW Comparison July 2025
BGS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BGS stands at 360.3M. In comparison, LW has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BGS is priced at $4.51, while LW trades at $60.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BGS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.70, whereas LW's P/E ratio is 24.35. In terms of profitability, BGS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to LW's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BGS is less volatile compared to LW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BGS.Check LW's competition here
BGS vs BRBR Comparison July 2025
BGS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BGS stands at 360.3M. In comparison, BRBR has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, BGS is priced at $4.51, while BRBR trades at $54.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BGS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.70, whereas BRBR's P/E ratio is 25.58. In terms of profitability, BGS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to BRBR's ROE of -1.32%. Regarding short-term risk, BGS is more volatile compared to BRBR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BGS.Check BRBR's competition here
BGS vs BRFS Comparison July 2025
BGS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BGS stands at 360.3M. In comparison, BRFS has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, BGS is priced at $4.51, while BRFS trades at $3.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BGS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.70, whereas BRFS's P/E ratio is 8.95. In terms of profitability, BGS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to BRFS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, BGS is more volatile compared to BRFS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BGS.Check BRFS's competition here
BGS vs POST Comparison July 2025
BGS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BGS stands at 360.3M. In comparison, POST has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, BGS is priced at $4.51, while POST trades at $107.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BGS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.70, whereas POST's P/E ratio is 19.11. In terms of profitability, BGS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to POST's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BGS is more volatile compared to POST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BGS.Check POST's competition here
BGS vs DAR Comparison July 2025
BGS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BGS stands at 360.3M. In comparison, DAR has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BGS is priced at $4.51, while DAR trades at $34.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BGS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.70, whereas DAR's P/E ratio is 52.75. In terms of profitability, BGS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to DAR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BGS is more volatile compared to DAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BGS.Check DAR's competition here
BGS vs LANC Comparison July 2025
BGS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BGS stands at 360.3M. In comparison, LANC has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BGS is priced at $4.51, while LANC trades at $172.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BGS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.70, whereas LANC's P/E ratio is 28.09. In terms of profitability, BGS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to LANC's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BGS is more volatile compared to LANC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BGS.Check LANC's competition here
BGS vs TWNK Comparison July 2025
BGS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BGS stands at 360.3M. In comparison, TWNK has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BGS is priced at $4.51, while TWNK trades at $33.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BGS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.70, whereas TWNK's P/E ratio is 26.64. In terms of profitability, BGS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to TWNK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BGS is more volatile compared to TWNK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BGS.Check TWNK's competition here
BGS vs TWNKW Comparison July 2025
BGS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BGS stands at 360.3M. In comparison, TWNKW has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BGS is priced at $4.51, while TWNKW trades at $3.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BGS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.70, whereas TWNKW's P/E ratio is 5.15. In terms of profitability, BGS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to TWNKW's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BGS is less volatile compared to TWNKW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BGS.Check TWNKW's competition here
BGS vs FRPT Comparison July 2025
BGS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BGS stands at 360.3M. In comparison, FRPT has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BGS is priced at $4.51, while FRPT trades at $70.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BGS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.70, whereas FRPT's P/E ratio is 235.87. In terms of profitability, BGS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to FRPT's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BGS is more volatile compared to FRPT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BGS.Check FRPT's competition here
BGS vs FLO Comparison July 2025
BGS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BGS stands at 360.3M. In comparison, FLO has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BGS is priced at $4.51, while FLO trades at $16.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BGS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.70, whereas FLO's P/E ratio is 15.05. In terms of profitability, BGS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to FLO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BGS is more volatile compared to FLO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BGS.Check FLO's competition here
BGS vs SMPL Comparison July 2025
BGS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BGS stands at 360.3M. In comparison, SMPL has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BGS is priced at $4.51, while SMPL trades at $33.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BGS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.70, whereas SMPL's P/E ratio is 23.21. In terms of profitability, BGS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to SMPL's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BGS is more volatile compared to SMPL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BGS.Check SMPL's competition here
BGS vs NOMD Comparison July 2025
BGS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BGS stands at 360.3M. In comparison, NOMD has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BGS is priced at $4.51, while NOMD trades at $17.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BGS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.70, whereas NOMD's P/E ratio is 10.97. In terms of profitability, BGS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to NOMD's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BGS is more volatile compared to NOMD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BGS.Check NOMD's competition here
BGS vs CENT Comparison July 2025
BGS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BGS stands at 360.3M. In comparison, CENT has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BGS is priced at $4.51, while CENT trades at $40.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BGS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.70, whereas CENT's P/E ratio is 21.43. In terms of profitability, BGS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to CENT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BGS is more volatile compared to CENT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BGS.Check CENT's competition here
BGS vs CENTA Comparison July 2025
BGS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BGS stands at 360.3M. In comparison, CENTA has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BGS is priced at $4.51, while CENTA trades at $36.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BGS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.70, whereas CENTA's P/E ratio is 19.46. In terms of profitability, BGS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to CENTA's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BGS is more volatile compared to CENTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BGS.Check CENTA's competition here
BGS vs SOVO Comparison July 2025
BGS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BGS stands at 360.3M. In comparison, SOVO has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BGS is priced at $4.51, while SOVO trades at $22.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BGS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.70, whereas SOVO's P/E ratio is 79.24. In terms of profitability, BGS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to SOVO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BGS is more volatile compared to SOVO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BGS.Check SOVO's competition here
BGS vs JJSF Comparison July 2025
BGS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BGS stands at 360.3M. In comparison, JJSF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BGS is priced at $4.51, while JJSF trades at $117.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BGS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.70, whereas JJSF's P/E ratio is 30.14. In terms of profitability, BGS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to JJSF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BGS is more volatile compared to JJSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BGS.Check JJSF's competition here
BGS vs KLG Comparison July 2025
BGS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BGS stands at 360.3M. In comparison, KLG has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, BGS is priced at $4.51, while KLG trades at $23.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BGS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.70, whereas KLG's P/E ratio is 35.60. In terms of profitability, BGS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to KLG's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BGS is more volatile compared to KLG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BGS.Check KLG's competition here
BGS vs UTZ Comparison July 2025
BGS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BGS stands at 360.3M. In comparison, UTZ has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BGS is priced at $4.51, while UTZ trades at $14.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BGS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.70, whereas UTZ's P/E ratio is 43.39. In terms of profitability, BGS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to UTZ's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BGS is more volatile compared to UTZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BGS.Check UTZ's competition here
BGS vs THS Comparison July 2025
BGS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BGS stands at 360.3M. In comparison, THS has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BGS is priced at $4.51, while THS trades at $21.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BGS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.70, whereas THS's P/E ratio is 212.99. In terms of profitability, BGS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to THS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BGS is more volatile compared to THS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BGS.Check THS's competition here
BGS vs HLF Comparison July 2025
BGS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BGS stands at 360.3M. In comparison, HLF has a market cap of 992.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BGS is priced at $4.51, while HLF trades at $9.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BGS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.70, whereas HLF's P/E ratio is 3.54. In terms of profitability, BGS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to HLF's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, BGS is more volatile compared to HLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BGS.Check HLF's competition here
BGS vs JBSS Comparison July 2025
BGS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BGS stands at 360.3M. In comparison, JBSS has a market cap of 800.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BGS is priced at $4.51, while JBSS trades at $68.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BGS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.70, whereas JBSS's P/E ratio is 14.43. In terms of profitability, BGS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to JBSS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BGS is more volatile compared to JBSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BGS.Check JBSS's competition here
BGS vs STKL Comparison July 2025
BGS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BGS stands at 360.3M. In comparison, STKL has a market cap of 780.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BGS is priced at $4.51, while STKL trades at $6.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BGS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.70, whereas STKL's P/E ratio is -73.78. In terms of profitability, BGS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to STKL's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BGS is more volatile compared to STKL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BGS.Check STKL's competition here
BGS vs SENEA Comparison July 2025
BGS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BGS stands at 360.3M. In comparison, SENEA has a market cap of 701.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BGS is priced at $4.51, while SENEA trades at $101.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BGS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.70, whereas SENEA's P/E ratio is 17.25. In terms of profitability, BGS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to SENEA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BGS is more volatile compared to SENEA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BGS.Check SENEA's competition here
BGS vs SENEB Comparison July 2025
BGS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BGS stands at 360.3M. In comparison, SENEB has a market cap of 698.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BGS is priced at $4.51, while SENEB trades at $103.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BGS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.70, whereas SENEB's P/E ratio is 17.18. In terms of profitability, BGS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to SENEB's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BGS is more volatile compared to SENEB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BGS.Check SENEB's competition here
BGS vs WEST Comparison July 2025
BGS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BGS stands at 360.3M. In comparison, WEST has a market cap of 672M. Regarding current trading prices, BGS is priced at $4.51, while WEST trades at $7.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BGS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.70, whereas WEST's P/E ratio is -7.80. In terms of profitability, BGS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to WEST's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, BGS is less volatile compared to WEST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BGS.Check WEST's competition here
BGS vs USNA Comparison July 2025
BGS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BGS stands at 360.3M. In comparison, USNA has a market cap of 594.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BGS is priced at $4.51, while USNA trades at $31.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BGS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.70, whereas USNA's P/E ratio is 17.54. In terms of profitability, BGS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to USNA's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BGS is more volatile compared to USNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BGS.Check USNA's competition here
BGS vs THRN Comparison July 2025
BGS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BGS stands at 360.3M. In comparison, THRN has a market cap of 550.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BGS is priced at $4.51, while THRN trades at $10.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BGS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.70, whereas THRN's P/E ratio is 26.13. In terms of profitability, BGS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to THRN's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BGS is more volatile compared to THRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BGS.Check THRN's competition here
BGS vs BRCC Comparison July 2025
BGS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BGS stands at 360.3M. In comparison, BRCC has a market cap of 432.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BGS is priced at $4.51, while BRCC trades at $2.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BGS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.70, whereas BRCC's P/E ratio is -22.67. In terms of profitability, BGS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to BRCC's ROE of -0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, BGS is less volatile compared to BRCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BGS.Check BRCC's competition here
BGS vs LWAY Comparison July 2025
BGS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BGS stands at 360.3M. In comparison, LWAY has a market cap of 402.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BGS is priced at $4.51, while LWAY trades at $26.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BGS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.70, whereas LWAY's P/E ratio is 39.51. In terms of profitability, BGS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to LWAY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BGS is more volatile compared to LWAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BGS.Check LWAY's competition here
BGS vs MAMA Comparison July 2025
BGS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BGS stands at 360.3M. In comparison, MAMA has a market cap of 339.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BGS is priced at $4.51, while MAMA trades at $9.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BGS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.70, whereas MAMA's P/E ratio is 82.09. In terms of profitability, BGS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to MAMA's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BGS is more volatile compared to MAMA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BGS.Check MAMA's competition here
BGS vs BYND Comparison July 2025
BGS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BGS stands at 360.3M. In comparison, BYND has a market cap of 276.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BGS is priced at $4.51, while BYND trades at $3.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BGS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.70, whereas BYND's P/E ratio is -1.59. In terms of profitability, BGS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to BYND's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, BGS is less volatile compared to BYND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BGS.Check BYND's competition here
BGS vs NATR Comparison July 2025
BGS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BGS stands at 360.3M. In comparison, NATR has a market cap of 271.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BGS is priced at $4.51, while NATR trades at $14.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BGS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.70, whereas NATR's P/E ratio is 27.75. In terms of profitability, BGS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to NATR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BGS is more volatile compared to NATR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BGS.Check NATR's competition here
BGS vs FREE Comparison July 2025
BGS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BGS stands at 360.3M. In comparison, FREE has a market cap of 211.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BGS is priced at $4.51, while FREE trades at $4.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BGS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.70, whereas FREE's P/E ratio is -8.54. In terms of profitability, BGS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to FREE's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BGS is more volatile compared to FREE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BGS.Check FREE's competition here
BGS vs LFVN Comparison July 2025
BGS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BGS stands at 360.3M. In comparison, LFVN has a market cap of 172.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BGS is priced at $4.51, while LFVN trades at $13.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BGS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.70, whereas LFVN's P/E ratio is 19.57. In terms of profitability, BGS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to LFVN's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, BGS is more volatile compared to LFVN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BGS.Check LFVN's competition here
BGS vs HAIN Comparison July 2025
BGS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BGS stands at 360.3M. In comparison, HAIN has a market cap of 168.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BGS is priced at $4.51, while HAIN trades at $1.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BGS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.70, whereas HAIN's P/E ratio is -0.64. In terms of profitability, BGS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to HAIN's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, BGS is more volatile compared to HAIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BGS.Check HAIN's competition here
BGS vs WESTW Comparison July 2025
BGS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BGS stands at 360.3M. In comparison, WESTW has a market cap of 168.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BGS is priced at $4.51, while WESTW trades at $1.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BGS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.70, whereas WESTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BGS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to WESTW's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, BGS is less volatile compared to WESTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BGS.Check WESTW's competition here
BGS vs MMMB Comparison July 2025
BGS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BGS stands at 360.3M. In comparison, MMMB has a market cap of 136.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BGS is priced at $4.51, while MMMB trades at $3.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BGS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.70, whereas MMMB's P/E ratio is 41.67. In terms of profitability, BGS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to MMMB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BGS is less volatile compared to MMMB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BGS.Check MMMB's competition here
BGS vs ABVEW Comparison July 2025
BGS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BGS stands at 360.3M. In comparison, ABVEW has a market cap of 126.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BGS is priced at $4.51, while ABVEW trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BGS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.70, whereas ABVEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BGS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to ABVEW's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BGS is less volatile compared to ABVEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BGS.Check ABVEW's competition here
BGS vs FTLF Comparison July 2025
BGS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BGS stands at 360.3M. In comparison, FTLF has a market cap of 121.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BGS is priced at $4.51, while FTLF trades at $12.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BGS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.70, whereas FTLF's P/E ratio is 14.33. In terms of profitability, BGS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to FTLF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, BGS is more volatile compared to FTLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BGS.Check FTLF's competition here
BGS vs PLIN Comparison July 2025
BGS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BGS stands at 360.3M. In comparison, PLIN has a market cap of 115.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BGS is priced at $4.51, while PLIN trades at $1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BGS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.70, whereas PLIN's P/E ratio is -0.83. In terms of profitability, BGS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to PLIN's ROE of -4.43%. Regarding short-term risk, BGS is less volatile compared to PLIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BGS.Check PLIN's competition here
BGS vs ABVE Comparison July 2025
BGS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BGS stands at 360.3M. In comparison, ABVE has a market cap of 99.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BGS is priced at $4.51, while ABVE trades at $1.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BGS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.70, whereas ABVE's P/E ratio is -1.10. In terms of profitability, BGS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to ABVE's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BGS is less volatile compared to ABVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BGS.Check ABVE's competition here
BGS vs LSF Comparison July 2025
BGS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BGS stands at 360.3M. In comparison, LSF has a market cap of 77.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BGS is priced at $4.51, while LSF trades at $7.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BGS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.70, whereas LSF's P/E ratio is -81.11. In terms of profitability, BGS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to LSF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BGS is more volatile compared to LSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BGS.Check LSF's competition here
BGS vs BRID Comparison July 2025
BGS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BGS stands at 360.3M. In comparison, BRID has a market cap of 71.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BGS is priced at $4.51, while BRID trades at $7.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BGS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.70, whereas BRID's P/E ratio is -9.74. In terms of profitability, BGS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to BRID's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BGS is less volatile compared to BRID. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BGS.Check BRID's competition here
BGS vs ATPC Comparison July 2025
BGS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BGS stands at 360.3M. In comparison, ATPC has a market cap of 65.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BGS is priced at $4.51, while ATPC trades at $1.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BGS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.70, whereas ATPC's P/E ratio is -2.52. In terms of profitability, BGS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to ATPC's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, BGS is less volatile compared to ATPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BGS.Check ATPC's competition here
BGS vs BRLS Comparison July 2025
BGS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BGS stands at 360.3M. In comparison, BRLS has a market cap of 64.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BGS is priced at $4.51, while BRLS trades at $3.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BGS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.70, whereas BRLS's P/E ratio is -3.15. In terms of profitability, BGS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to BRLS's ROE of -8.92%. Regarding short-term risk, BGS is more volatile compared to BRLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BGS.Check BRLS's competition here
BGS vs WYHG Comparison July 2025
BGS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BGS stands at 360.3M. In comparison, WYHG has a market cap of 62.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BGS is priced at $4.51, while WYHG trades at $1.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BGS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.70, whereas WYHG's P/E ratio is 6.53. In terms of profitability, BGS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to WYHG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BGS is less volatile compared to WYHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BGS.Check WYHG's competition here
BGS vs PAVS Comparison July 2025
BGS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BGS stands at 360.3M. In comparison, PAVS has a market cap of 58.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BGS is priced at $4.51, while PAVS trades at $0.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BGS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.70, whereas PAVS's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, BGS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to PAVS's ROE of -2.87%. Regarding short-term risk, BGS is less volatile compared to PAVS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BGS.Check PAVS's competition here
BGS vs MITC Comparison July 2025
BGS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BGS stands at 360.3M. In comparison, MITC has a market cap of 57.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BGS is priced at $4.51, while MITC trades at $3.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BGS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.70, whereas MITC's P/E ratio is -2.15. In terms of profitability, BGS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to MITC's ROE of -1.20%. Regarding short-term risk, BGS is less volatile compared to MITC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BGS.Check MITC's competition here
BGS vs FARM Comparison July 2025
BGS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BGS stands at 360.3M. In comparison, FARM has a market cap of 37.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BGS is priced at $4.51, while FARM trades at $1.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BGS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.70, whereas FARM's P/E ratio is -2.57. In terms of profitability, BGS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to FARM's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, BGS is less volatile compared to FARM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BGS.Check FARM's competition here
BGS vs CLXT Comparison July 2025
BGS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BGS stands at 360.3M. In comparison, CLXT has a market cap of 31.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BGS is priced at $4.51, while CLXT trades at $6.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BGS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.70, whereas CLXT's P/E ratio is -1.64. In terms of profitability, BGS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to CLXT's ROE of -3.34%. Regarding short-term risk, BGS is less volatile compared to CLXT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BGS.Check CLXT's competition here
BGS vs HAPP Comparison July 2025
BGS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BGS stands at 360.3M. In comparison, HAPP has a market cap of 31.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BGS is priced at $4.51, while HAPP trades at $4.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BGS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.70, whereas HAPP's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, BGS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to HAPP's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, BGS is more volatile compared to HAPP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BGS.Check HAPP's competition here
BGS vs BTOG Comparison July 2025
BGS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BGS stands at 360.3M. In comparison, BTOG has a market cap of 30.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BGS is priced at $4.51, while BTOG trades at $0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BGS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.70, whereas BTOG's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, BGS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to BTOG's ROE of -6.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BGS is less volatile compared to BTOG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BGS.Check BTOG's competition here
BGS vs JVA Comparison July 2025
BGS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BGS stands at 360.3M. In comparison, JVA has a market cap of 26.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BGS is priced at $4.51, while JVA trades at $4.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BGS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.70, whereas JVA's P/E ratio is 7.16. In terms of profitability, BGS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to JVA's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BGS is more volatile compared to JVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BGS.Check JVA's competition here
BGS vs BOF Comparison July 2025
BGS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BGS stands at 360.3M. In comparison, BOF has a market cap of 23.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BGS is priced at $4.51, while BOF trades at $2.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BGS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.70, whereas BOF's P/E ratio is -3.66. In terms of profitability, BGS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to BOF's ROE of -1.90%. Regarding short-term risk, BGS is less volatile compared to BOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BGS.Check BOF's competition here
BGS vs YGF Comparison July 2025
BGS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BGS stands at 360.3M. In comparison, YGF has a market cap of 23.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BGS is priced at $4.51, while YGF trades at $0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BGS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.70, whereas YGF's P/E ratio is 5.24. In terms of profitability, BGS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to YGF's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, BGS is more volatile compared to YGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BGS.Check YGF's competition here
BGS vs NCRA Comparison July 2025
BGS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BGS stands at 360.3M. In comparison, NCRA has a market cap of 23.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BGS is priced at $4.51, while NCRA trades at $1.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BGS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.70, whereas NCRA's P/E ratio is -9.46. In terms of profitability, BGS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to NCRA's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, BGS is less volatile compared to NCRA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BGS.Check NCRA's competition here
BGS vs NAII Comparison July 2025
BGS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BGS stands at 360.3M. In comparison, NAII has a market cap of 22.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BGS is priced at $4.51, while NAII trades at $3.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BGS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.70, whereas NAII's P/E ratio is -2.60. In terms of profitability, BGS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to NAII's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BGS is more volatile compared to NAII. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BGS.Check NAII's competition here
BGS vs SOWG Comparison July 2025
BGS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BGS stands at 360.3M. In comparison, SOWG has a market cap of 17.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BGS is priced at $4.51, while SOWG trades at $1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BGS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.70, whereas SOWG's P/E ratio is -2.18. In terms of profitability, BGS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to SOWG's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BGS is less volatile compared to SOWG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BGS.Check SOWG's competition here
BGS vs PLAG Comparison July 2025
BGS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BGS stands at 360.3M. In comparison, PLAG has a market cap of 14.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BGS is priced at $4.51, while PLAG trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BGS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.70, whereas PLAG's P/E ratio is -1.92. In terms of profitability, BGS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to PLAG's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, BGS is less volatile compared to PLAG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BGS.Check PLAG's competition here
BGS vs DDC Comparison July 2025
BGS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BGS stands at 360.3M. In comparison, DDC has a market cap of 14.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BGS is priced at $4.51, while DDC trades at $17.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BGS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.70, whereas DDC's P/E ratio is -7.45. In terms of profitability, BGS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to DDC's ROE of -3.66%. Regarding short-term risk, BGS is less volatile compared to DDC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BGS.Check DDC's competition here
BGS vs COOT Comparison July 2025
BGS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BGS stands at 360.3M. In comparison, COOT has a market cap of 14.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BGS is priced at $4.51, while COOT trades at $0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BGS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.70, whereas COOT's P/E ratio is -0.64. In terms of profitability, BGS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to COOT's ROE of +0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, BGS is more volatile compared to COOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BGS.Check COOT's competition here
BGS vs TTCF Comparison July 2025
BGS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BGS stands at 360.3M. In comparison, TTCF has a market cap of 13.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BGS is priced at $4.51, while TTCF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BGS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.70, whereas TTCF's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, BGS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to TTCF's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, BGS is less volatile compared to TTCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BGS.Check TTCF's competition here
BGS vs RGF Comparison July 2025
BGS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BGS stands at 360.3M. In comparison, RGF has a market cap of 11.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BGS is priced at $4.51, while RGF trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BGS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.70, whereas RGF's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, BGS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to RGF's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, BGS is less volatile compared to RGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BGS.Check RGF's competition here
BGS vs PETZ Comparison July 2025
BGS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BGS stands at 360.3M. In comparison, PETZ has a market cap of 9.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BGS is priced at $4.51, while PETZ trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BGS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.70, whereas PETZ's P/E ratio is 4.77. In terms of profitability, BGS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to PETZ's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BGS is less volatile compared to PETZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BGS.Check PETZ's competition here
BGS vs BON Comparison July 2025
BGS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BGS stands at 360.3M. In comparison, BON has a market cap of 9.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BGS is priced at $4.51, while BON trades at $1.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BGS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.70, whereas BON's P/E ratio is 0.32. In terms of profitability, BGS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to BON's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BGS is less volatile compared to BON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BGS.Check BON's competition here
BGS vs IMG Comparison July 2025
BGS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BGS stands at 360.3M. In comparison, IMG has a market cap of 9.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BGS is priced at $4.51, while IMG trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BGS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.70, whereas IMG's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, BGS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to IMG's ROE of -72.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BGS is less volatile compared to IMG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BGS.Check IMG's competition here
BGS vs NUZE Comparison July 2025
BGS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BGS stands at 360.3M. In comparison, NUZE has a market cap of 6.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BGS is priced at $4.51, while NUZE trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BGS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.70, whereas NUZE's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, BGS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to NUZE's ROE of -70.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BGS is less volatile compared to NUZE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BGS.Check NUZE's competition here
BGS vs HCWC Comparison July 2025
BGS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BGS stands at 360.3M. In comparison, HCWC has a market cap of 5.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BGS is priced at $4.51, while HCWC trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BGS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.70, whereas HCWC's P/E ratio is -0.99. In terms of profitability, BGS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to HCWC's ROE of -1.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BGS is less volatile compared to HCWC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BGS.Check HCWC's competition here
BGS vs BTTR Comparison July 2025
BGS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BGS stands at 360.3M. In comparison, BTTR has a market cap of 5.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BGS is priced at $4.51, while BTTR trades at $2.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BGS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.70, whereas BTTR's P/E ratio is -21.20. In terms of profitability, BGS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to BTTR's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, BGS is less volatile compared to BTTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BGS.Check BTTR's competition here
BGS vs ORIS Comparison July 2025
BGS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BGS stands at 360.3M. In comparison, ORIS has a market cap of 3.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BGS is priced at $4.51, while ORIS trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BGS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.70, whereas ORIS's P/E ratio is 1.03. In terms of profitability, BGS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to ORIS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BGS is less volatile compared to ORIS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BGS.Check ORIS's competition here
BGS vs FREEW Comparison July 2025
BGS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BGS stands at 360.3M. In comparison, FREEW has a market cap of 2.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BGS is priced at $4.51, while FREEW trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BGS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.70, whereas FREEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BGS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to FREEW's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BGS is less volatile compared to FREEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BGS.Check FREEW's competition here
BGS vs CYAN Comparison July 2025
BGS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BGS stands at 360.3M. In comparison, CYAN has a market cap of 2.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BGS is priced at $4.51, while CYAN trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BGS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.70, whereas CYAN's P/E ratio is -0.84. In terms of profitability, BGS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to CYAN's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, BGS is less volatile compared to CYAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BGS.Check CYAN's competition here
BGS vs FAMI Comparison July 2025
BGS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BGS stands at 360.3M. In comparison, FAMI has a market cap of 2.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BGS is priced at $4.51, while FAMI trades at $1.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BGS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.70, whereas FAMI's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, BGS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to FAMI's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BGS is less volatile compared to FAMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BGS.Check FAMI's competition here
BGS vs BRLSW Comparison July 2025
BGS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BGS stands at 360.3M. In comparison, BRLSW has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BGS is priced at $4.51, while BRLSW trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BGS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.70, whereas BRLSW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BGS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to BRLSW's ROE of -8.92%. Regarding short-term risk, BGS is less volatile compared to BRLSW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BGS.Check BRLSW's competition here
BGS vs STKH Comparison July 2025
BGS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BGS stands at 360.3M. In comparison, STKH has a market cap of 914K. Regarding current trading prices, BGS is priced at $4.51, while STKH trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BGS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.70, whereas STKH's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, BGS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to STKH's ROE of -1.44%. Regarding short-term risk, BGS is less volatile compared to STKH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BGS.Check STKH's competition here
BGS vs BSFC Comparison July 2025
BGS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BGS stands at 360.3M. In comparison, BSFC has a market cap of 723.7K. Regarding current trading prices, BGS is priced at $4.51, while BSFC trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BGS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.70, whereas BSFC's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, BGS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to BSFC's ROE of -4.26%. Regarding short-term risk, BGS is less volatile compared to BSFC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BGS.Check BSFC's competition here
BGS vs SNAX Comparison July 2025
BGS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BGS stands at 360.3M. In comparison, SNAX has a market cap of 605K. Regarding current trading prices, BGS is priced at $4.51, while SNAX trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BGS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.70, whereas SNAX's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, BGS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to SNAX's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BGS is less volatile compared to SNAX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BGS.Check SNAX's competition here
BGS vs SMFL Comparison July 2025
BGS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BGS stands at 360.3M. In comparison, SMFL has a market cap of 171.6K. Regarding current trading prices, BGS is priced at $4.51, while SMFL trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BGS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.70, whereas SMFL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BGS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to SMFL's ROE of +5.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BGS is less volatile compared to SMFL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BGS.Check SMFL's competition here
BGS vs SNAXW Comparison July 2025
BGS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BGS stands at 360.3M. In comparison, SNAXW has a market cap of 13.4K. Regarding current trading prices, BGS is priced at $4.51, while SNAXW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BGS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.70, whereas SNAXW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, BGS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to SNAXW's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BGS is more volatile compared to SNAXW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BGS.Check SNAXW's competition here
BGS vs RIBT Comparison July 2025
BGS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BGS stands at 360.3M. In comparison, RIBT has a market cap of 1K. Regarding current trading prices, BGS is priced at $4.51, while RIBT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BGS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.70, whereas RIBT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BGS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to RIBT's ROE of +1.36%. Regarding short-term risk, BGS is more volatile compared to RIBT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BGS.Check RIBT's competition here
BGS vs BRCN Comparison July 2025
BGS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BGS stands at 360.3M. In comparison, BRCN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BGS is priced at $4.51, while BRCN trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BGS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.70, whereas BRCN's P/E ratio is -6.67. In terms of profitability, BGS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to BRCN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BGS is less volatile compared to BRCN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BGS.Check BRCN's competition here
BGS vs VGFC Comparison July 2025
BGS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BGS stands at 360.3M. In comparison, VGFC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BGS is priced at $4.51, while VGFC trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BGS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.70, whereas VGFC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BGS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to VGFC's ROE of -1.70%. Regarding short-term risk, BGS is less volatile compared to VGFC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BGS.Check VGFC's competition here
BGS vs DTEA Comparison July 2025
BGS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BGS stands at 360.3M. In comparison, DTEA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BGS is priced at $4.51, while DTEA trades at $0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BGS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.70, whereas DTEA's P/E ratio is -1.44. In terms of profitability, BGS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to DTEA's ROE of +9.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BGS is less volatile compared to DTEA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BGS.Check DTEA's competition here
BGS vs SAFM Comparison July 2025
BGS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BGS stands at 360.3M. In comparison, SAFM has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BGS is priced at $4.51, while SAFM trades at $204.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BGS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.70, whereas SAFM's P/E ratio is 5.28. In terms of profitability, BGS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to SAFM's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, BGS is more volatile compared to SAFM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BGS.Check SAFM's competition here