Waste Management, Inc. (NYSE: WM) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

Waste Management, Inc. (NYSE: WM) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 87.5B. In comparison, RSG has a market cap of 68.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $218.99 on the NYSE, while RSG trades at $222.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WM currently has a P/E ratio of 28.66, whereas RSG's P/E ratio is 31.24. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.29%, compared to RSG's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, WM is less volatile compared to RSG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.Check RSG's competition here

Waste Management, Inc. (NYSE: WM) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 87.5B. In comparison, WCN has a market cap of 41.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $218.99 on the NYSE, while WCN trades at $164.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WM currently has a P/E ratio of 28.66, whereas WCN's P/E ratio is 31.41. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.29%, compared to WCN's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WM is more volatile compared to WCN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.Check WCN's competition here

Waste Management, Inc. (NYSE: WM) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 87.5B. In comparison, GFLU has a market cap of 25B. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $218.99 on the NYSE, while GFLU trades at $70.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WM currently has a P/E ratio of 28.66, whereas GFLU's P/E ratio is -91.90. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.29%, compared to GFLU's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WM is less volatile compared to GFLU. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.Check GFLU's competition here

Waste Management, Inc. (NYSE: WM) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 87.5B. In comparison, CLH has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $218.99 on the NYSE, while CLH trades at $317.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WM currently has a P/E ratio of 28.66, whereas CLH's P/E ratio is 38.47. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.29%, compared to CLH's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WM is more volatile compared to CLH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.Check CLH's competition here

Waste Management, Inc. (NYSE: WM) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 87.5B. In comparison, GFL has a market cap of 15.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $218.99 on the NYSE, while GFL trades at $43.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WM currently has a P/E ratio of 28.66, whereas GFL's P/E ratio is 64.31. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.29%, compared to GFL's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WM is less volatile compared to GFL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.Check GFL's competition here

Waste Management, Inc. (NYSE: WM) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 87.5B. In comparison, CWST has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $218.99 on the NYSE, while CWST trades at $93.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WM currently has a P/E ratio of 28.66, whereas CWST's P/E ratio is 73.07. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.29%, compared to CWST's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WM is less volatile compared to CWST. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.Check CWST's competition here

Waste Management, Inc. (NYSE: WM) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 87.5B. In comparison, SRCL has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $218.99 on the NYSE, while SRCL trades at $61.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WM currently has a P/E ratio of 28.66, whereas SRCL's P/E ratio is 158.92. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.29%, compared to SRCL's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WM is more volatile compared to SRCL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.Check SRCL's competition here

Waste Management, Inc. (NYSE: WM) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 87.5B. In comparison, NVRI has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $218.99 on the NYSE, while NVRI trades at $22.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WM currently has a P/E ratio of 28.66, whereas NVRI's P/E ratio is -99.83. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.29%, compared to NVRI's ROE of +2.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WM is less volatile compared to NVRI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.Check NVRI's competition here

Waste Management, Inc. (NYSE: WM) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 87.5B. In comparison, HCCI has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $218.99 on the NYSE, while HCCI trades at $45.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WM currently has a P/E ratio of 28.66, whereas HCCI's P/E ratio is 14.22. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.29%, compared to HCCI's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, WM is more volatile compared to HCCI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.Check HCCI's competition here

Waste Management, Inc. (NYSE: WM) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 87.5B. In comparison, HSC has a market cap of 729.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $218.99 on the NYSE, while HSC trades at $9.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WM currently has a P/E ratio of 28.66, whereas HSC's P/E ratio is -5.08. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.29%, compared to HSC's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, WM is less volatile compared to HSC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.Check HSC's competition here

Waste Management, Inc. (NYSE: WM) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 87.5B. In comparison, ONT has a market cap of 645.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $218.99 on the NYSE, while ONT trades at $17.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WM currently has a P/E ratio of 28.66, whereas ONT's P/E ratio is -59.52. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.29%, compared to ONT's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WM is less volatile compared to ONT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.Check ONT's competition here

Waste Management, Inc. (NYSE: WM) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 87.5B. In comparison, MEG has a market cap of 565.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $218.99 on the NYSE, while MEG trades at $15.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WM currently has a P/E ratio of 28.66, whereas MEG's P/E ratio is -120.31. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.29%, compared to MEG's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WM is less volatile compared to MEG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.Check MEG's competition here

Waste Management, Inc. (NYSE: WM) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 87.5B. In comparison, PESI has a market cap of 396.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $218.99 on the NYSE, while PESI trades at $18.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WM currently has a P/E ratio of 28.66, whereas PESI's P/E ratio is -23.67. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.29%, compared to PESI's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, WM is less volatile compared to PESI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.Check PESI's competition here

Waste Management, Inc. (NYSE: WM) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 87.5B. In comparison, ABAT has a market cap of 379.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $218.99 on the NYSE, while ABAT trades at $2.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WM currently has a P/E ratio of 28.66, whereas ABAT's P/E ratio is -5.45. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.29%, compared to ABAT's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, WM is less volatile compared to ABAT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.Check ABAT's competition here

Waste Management, Inc. (NYSE: WM) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 87.5B. In comparison, ESGL has a market cap of 80.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $218.99 on the NYSE, while ESGL trades at $1.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WM currently has a P/E ratio of 28.66, whereas ESGL's P/E ratio is -31.50. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.29%, compared to ESGL's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WM is more volatile compared to ESGL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.Check ESGL's competition here

Waste Management, Inc. (NYSE: WM) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 87.5B. In comparison, YDDL has a market cap of 75.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $218.99 on the NYSE, while YDDL trades at $1.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WM currently has a P/E ratio of 28.66, whereas YDDL's P/E ratio is 7.50. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.29%, compared to YDDL's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, WM is less volatile compared to YDDL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.Check YDDL's competition here

Waste Management, Inc. (NYSE: WM) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 87.5B. In comparison, ENGS has a market cap of 37.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $218.99 on the NYSE, while ENGS trades at $2.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WM currently has a P/E ratio of 28.66, whereas ENGS's P/E ratio is -12.50. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.29%, compared to ENGS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, WM is less volatile compared to ENGS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.Check ENGS's competition here

Waste Management, Inc. (NYSE: WM) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 87.5B. In comparison, LICY has a market cap of 29.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $218.99 on the NYSE, while LICY trades at $0.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WM currently has a P/E ratio of 28.66, whereas LICY's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.29%, compared to LICY's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, WM is less volatile compared to LICY. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.Check LICY's competition here

Waste Management, Inc. (NYSE: WM) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 87.5B. In comparison, QRHC has a market cap of 29.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $218.99 on the NYSE, while QRHC trades at $1.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WM currently has a P/E ratio of 28.66, whereas QRHC's P/E ratio is -5.75. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.29%, compared to QRHC's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, WM is more volatile compared to QRHC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.Check QRHC's competition here

Waste Management, Inc. (NYSE: WM) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 87.5B. In comparison, AMBI has a market cap of 24.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $218.99 on the NYSE, while AMBI trades at $0.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WM currently has a P/E ratio of 28.66, whereas AMBI's P/E ratio is -44.00. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.29%, compared to AMBI's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WM is less volatile compared to AMBI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.Check AMBI's competition here

Waste Management, Inc. (NYSE: WM) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 87.5B. In comparison, OIO has a market cap of 24.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $218.99 on the NYSE, while OIO trades at $1.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WM currently has a P/E ratio of 28.66, whereas OIO's P/E ratio is -1.78. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.29%, compared to OIO's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, WM is less volatile compared to OIO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.Check OIO's competition here

Waste Management, Inc. (NYSE: WM) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 87.5B. In comparison, CHRA has a market cap of 20.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $218.99 on the NYSE, while CHRA trades at $5.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WM currently has a P/E ratio of 28.66, whereas CHRA's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.29%, compared to CHRA's ROE of +20.59%. Regarding short-term risk, WM is more volatile compared to CHRA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.Check CHRA's competition here

Waste Management, Inc. (NYSE: WM) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 87.5B. In comparison, LNZA has a market cap of 13.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $218.99 on the NYSE, while LNZA trades at $6.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WM currently has a P/E ratio of 28.66, whereas LNZA's P/E ratio is -0.39. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.29%, compared to LNZA's ROE of +2.30%. Regarding short-term risk, WM is less volatile compared to LNZA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.Check LNZA's competition here

Waste Management, Inc. (NYSE: WM) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 87.5B. In comparison, AQMS has a market cap of 10.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $218.99 on the NYSE, while AQMS trades at $3.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WM currently has a P/E ratio of 28.66, whereas AQMS's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.29%, compared to AQMS's ROE of -1.46%. Regarding short-term risk, WM is less volatile compared to AQMS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.Check AQMS's competition here

Waste Management, Inc. (NYSE: WM) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 87.5B. In comparison, AWX has a market cap of 10.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $218.99 on the NYSE, while AWX trades at $2.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WM currently has a P/E ratio of 28.66, whereas AWX's P/E ratio is 8.65. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.29%, compared to AWX's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WM is less volatile compared to AWX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.Check AWX's competition here

Waste Management, Inc. (NYSE: WM) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 87.5B. In comparison, GWAV has a market cap of 4.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $218.99 on the NYSE, while GWAV trades at $5.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WM currently has a P/E ratio of 28.66, whereas GWAV's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.29%, compared to GWAV's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, WM is less volatile compared to GWAV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.Check GWAV's competition here

Waste Management, Inc. (NYSE: WM) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 87.5B. In comparison, DXST has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $218.99 on the NYSE, while DXST trades at $2.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WM currently has a P/E ratio of 28.66, whereas DXST's P/E ratio is -4.25. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.29%, compared to DXST's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WM is less volatile compared to DXST. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.Check DXST's competition here

Waste Management, Inc. (NYSE: WM) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 87.5B. In comparison, CDTG has a market cap of 703.3K. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $218.99 on the NYSE, while CDTG trades at $1.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WM currently has a P/E ratio of 28.66, whereas CDTG's P/E ratio is -0.56. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.29%, compared to CDTG's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, WM is less volatile compared to CDTG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.Check CDTG's competition here

Waste Management, Inc. (NYSE: WM) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 87.5B. In comparison, ECOL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $218.99 on the NYSE, while ECOL trades at $47.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WM currently has a P/E ratio of 28.66, whereas ECOL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.29%, compared to ECOL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WM is more volatile compared to ECOL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.Check ECOL's competition here

Waste Management, Inc. (NYSE: WM) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 87.5B. In comparison, SMED has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $218.99 on the NYSE, while SMED trades at $8.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WM currently has a P/E ratio of 28.66, whereas SMED's P/E ratio is 36.46. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.29%, compared to SMED's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, WM is more volatile compared to SMED. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.Check SMED's competition here

Waste Management, Inc. (NYSE: WM) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 87.5B. In comparison, CVA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $218.99 on the NYSE, while CVA trades at $20.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WM currently has a P/E ratio of 28.66, whereas CVA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.29%, compared to CVA's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WM is more volatile compared to CVA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.Check CVA's competition here

Waste Management, Inc. (NYSE: WM) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 87.5B. In comparison, NES has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $218.99 on the NYSE, while NES trades at $2.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WM currently has a P/E ratio of 28.66, whereas NES's P/E ratio is -1.32. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.29%, compared to NES's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, WM is less volatile compared to NES. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.Check NES's competition here

Waste Management, Inc. (NYSE: WM) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 87.5B. In comparison, ECOLW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $218.99 on the NYSE, while ECOLW trades at $5.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WM currently has a P/E ratio of 28.66, whereas ECOLW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.29%, compared to ECOLW's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WM is more volatile compared to ECOLW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.Check ECOLW's competition here