Waste Management, Inc.

WM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 87.5B. In comparison, RSG has a market cap of 64.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $217.90, while RSG trades at $208.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WM currently has a P/E ratio of 31.78, whereas RSG's P/E ratio is 29.97. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.29%, compared to RSG's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, WM and RSG have similar daily volatility (1.20).Check RSG's competition here

WM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 87.5B. In comparison, WCN has a market cap of 39.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $217.90, while WCN trades at $155.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WM currently has a P/E ratio of 31.78, whereas WCN's P/E ratio is 37.99. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.29%, compared to WCN's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WM is less volatile compared to WCN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.Check WCN's competition here

WM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 87.5B. In comparison, GFLU has a market cap of 25B. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $217.90, while GFLU trades at $70.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WM currently has a P/E ratio of 31.78, whereas GFLU's P/E ratio is -91.90. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.29%, compared to GFLU's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WM is less volatile compared to GFLU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.Check GFLU's competition here

WM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 87.5B. In comparison, CLH has a market cap of 15.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $217.90, while CLH trades at $286.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WM currently has a P/E ratio of 31.78, whereas CLH's P/E ratio is 38.91. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.29%, compared to CLH's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WM is less volatile compared to CLH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.Check CLH's competition here

WM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 87.5B. In comparison, GFL has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $217.90, while GFL trades at $35.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WM currently has a P/E ratio of 31.78, whereas GFL's P/E ratio is 96.51. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.29%, compared to GFL's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WM is less volatile compared to GFL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.Check GFL's competition here

WM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 87.5B. In comparison, SRCL has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $217.90, while SRCL trades at $61.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WM currently has a P/E ratio of 31.78, whereas SRCL's P/E ratio is 158.92. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.29%, compared to SRCL's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WM is more volatile compared to SRCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.Check SRCL's competition here

WM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 87.5B. In comparison, CWST has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $217.90, while CWST trades at $87.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WM currently has a P/E ratio of 31.78, whereas CWST's P/E ratio is 794.64. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.29%, compared to CWST's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WM is less volatile compared to CWST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.Check CWST's competition here

WM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 87.5B. In comparison, NVRI has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $217.90, while NVRI trades at $19.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WM currently has a P/E ratio of 31.78, whereas NVRI's P/E ratio is -9.56. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.29%, compared to NVRI's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, WM is less volatile compared to NVRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.Check NVRI's competition here

WM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 87.5B. In comparison, HCCI has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $217.90, while HCCI trades at $45.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WM currently has a P/E ratio of 31.78, whereas HCCI's P/E ratio is 14.22. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.29%, compared to HCCI's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, WM is more volatile compared to HCCI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.Check HCCI's competition here

WM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 87.5B. In comparison, HSC has a market cap of 729.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $217.90, while HSC trades at $9.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WM currently has a P/E ratio of 31.78, whereas HSC's P/E ratio is -5.08. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.29%, compared to HSC's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, WM is less volatile compared to HSC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.Check HSC's competition here

WM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 87.5B. In comparison, MEG has a market cap of 565.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $217.90, while MEG trades at $15.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WM currently has a P/E ratio of 31.78, whereas MEG's P/E ratio is -120.31. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.29%, compared to MEG's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WM is less volatile compared to MEG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.Check MEG's competition here

WM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 87.5B. In comparison, PESI has a market cap of 166.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $217.90, while PESI trades at $8.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WM currently has a P/E ratio of 31.78, whereas PESI's P/E ratio is -11.33. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.29%, compared to PESI's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, WM is less volatile compared to PESI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.Check PESI's competition here

WM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 87.5B. In comparison, YDDL has a market cap of 151.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $217.90, while YDDL trades at $3.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WM currently has a P/E ratio of 31.78, whereas YDDL's P/E ratio is 15.00. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.29%, compared to YDDL's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, WM is less volatile compared to YDDL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.Check YDDL's competition here

WM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 87.5B. In comparison, ESGL has a market cap of 80.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $217.90, while ESGL trades at $1.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WM currently has a P/E ratio of 31.78, whereas ESGL's P/E ratio is -31.50. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.29%, compared to ESGL's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WM is less volatile compared to ESGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.Check ESGL's competition here

WM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 87.5B. In comparison, LICY has a market cap of 29.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $217.90, while LICY trades at $0.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WM currently has a P/E ratio of 31.78, whereas LICY's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.29%, compared to LICY's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, WM is less volatile compared to LICY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.Check LICY's competition here

WM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 87.5B. In comparison, AMBI has a market cap of 24.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $217.90, while AMBI trades at $0.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WM currently has a P/E ratio of 31.78, whereas AMBI's P/E ratio is -44.00. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.29%, compared to AMBI's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WM is less volatile compared to AMBI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.Check AMBI's competition here

WM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 87.5B. In comparison, QRHC has a market cap of 24.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $217.90, while QRHC trades at $1.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WM currently has a P/E ratio of 31.78, whereas QRHC's P/E ratio is -3.38. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.29%, compared to QRHC's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, WM is less volatile compared to QRHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.Check QRHC's competition here

WM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 87.5B. In comparison, ENGS has a market cap of 22.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $217.90, while ENGS trades at $1.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WM currently has a P/E ratio of 31.78, whereas ENGS's P/E ratio is -6.74. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.29%, compared to ENGS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, WM is less volatile compared to ENGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.Check ENGS's competition here

WM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 87.5B. In comparison, CHRA has a market cap of 20.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $217.90, while CHRA trades at $5.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WM currently has a P/E ratio of 31.78, whereas CHRA's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.29%, compared to CHRA's ROE of +20.59%. Regarding short-term risk, WM is more volatile compared to CHRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.Check CHRA's competition here

WM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 87.5B. In comparison, LNZA has a market cap of 17.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $217.90, while LNZA trades at $7.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WM currently has a P/E ratio of 31.78, whereas LNZA's P/E ratio is -0.55. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.29%, compared to LNZA's ROE of -12.68%. Regarding short-term risk, WM is less volatile compared to LNZA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.Check LNZA's competition here

WM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 87.5B. In comparison, AQMS has a market cap of 13.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $217.90, while AQMS trades at $3.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WM currently has a P/E ratio of 31.78, whereas AQMS's P/E ratio is -0.65. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.29%, compared to AQMS's ROE of -1.85%. Regarding short-term risk, WM is less volatile compared to AQMS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.Check AQMS's competition here

WM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 87.5B. In comparison, AWX has a market cap of 9.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $217.90, while AWX trades at $2.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WM currently has a P/E ratio of 31.78, whereas AWX's P/E ratio is 18.14. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.29%, compared to AWX's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WM is less volatile compared to AWX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.Check AWX's competition here

WM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 87.5B. In comparison, CHNR has a market cap of 5.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $217.90, while CHNR trades at $4.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WM currently has a P/E ratio of 31.78, whereas CHNR's P/E ratio is -28.96. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.29%, compared to CHNR's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WM is less volatile compared to CHNR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.Check CHNR's competition here

WM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 87.5B. In comparison, CDTG has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $217.90, while CDTG trades at $0.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WM currently has a P/E ratio of 31.78, whereas CDTG's P/E ratio is -0.37. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.29%, compared to CDTG's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, WM is less volatile compared to CDTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.Check CDTG's competition here

WM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 87.5B. In comparison, GWAV has a market cap of 3M. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $217.90, while GWAV trades at $3.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WM currently has a P/E ratio of 31.78, whereas GWAV's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.29%, compared to GWAV's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, WM is less volatile compared to GWAV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.Check GWAV's competition here

WM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 87.5B. In comparison, DXST has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $217.90, while DXST trades at $1.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WM currently has a P/E ratio of 31.78, whereas DXST's P/E ratio is -3.66. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.29%, compared to DXST's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WM is less volatile compared to DXST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.Check DXST's competition here

WM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 87.5B. In comparison, ECOLW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $217.90, while ECOLW trades at $5.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WM currently has a P/E ratio of 31.78, whereas ECOLW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.29%, compared to ECOLW's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WM is more volatile compared to ECOLW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.Check ECOLW's competition here

WM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 87.5B. In comparison, ECOL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $217.90, while ECOL trades at $47.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WM currently has a P/E ratio of 31.78, whereas ECOL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.29%, compared to ECOL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WM is more volatile compared to ECOL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.Check ECOL's competition here

WM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 87.5B. In comparison, CVA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $217.90, while CVA trades at $20.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WM currently has a P/E ratio of 31.78, whereas CVA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.29%, compared to CVA's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WM is more volatile compared to CVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.Check CVA's competition here

WM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 87.5B. In comparison, SMED has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $217.90, while SMED trades at $8.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WM currently has a P/E ratio of 31.78, whereas SMED's P/E ratio is 36.46. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.29%, compared to SMED's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, WM is more volatile compared to SMED. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.Check SMED's competition here

WM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 87.5B. In comparison, NES has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $217.90, while NES trades at $2.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WM currently has a P/E ratio of 31.78, whereas NES's P/E ratio is -1.32. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.29%, compared to NES's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, WM is less volatile compared to NES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.Check NES's competition here