Waste Management, Inc. (WM) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (WM) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Waste Management Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WM | $233.18 | -2.46% | 93.7B | 30.53 | $7.64 | +1.52% |
| RSG | $214.63 | -2.68% | 66B | 30.10 | $7.13 | +1.16% |
| WCN | $168.43 | -1.43% | 42.8B | 32.08 | $5.25 | +0.81% |
| GFLU | $70.30 | +4.32% | 25B | -91.90 | -$0.77 | N/A |
| CLH | $305.16 | -1.63% | 16.1B | 41.34 | $7.38 | N/A |
| GFL | $38.35 | -1.99% | 13.4B | 56.38 | $0.68 | +0.17% |
| SRCL | $61.98 | +0.83% | 5.8B | 158.92 | $0.39 | N/A |
| CWST | $90.54 | -3.24% | 5.7B | 70.73 | $1.28 | N/A |
| NVRI | $21.87 | -0.95% | 1.8B | -95.26 | -$0.23 | +69.08% |
| HCCI | $45.51 | +0.09% | 1.1B | 14.22 | $3.20 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
WM vs RSG Comparison July 2026
WM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 93.7B. In comparison, RSG has a market cap of 66B. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $233.18, while RSG trades at $214.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WM currently has a P/E ratio of 30.53, whereas RSG's P/E ratio is 30.10. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.29%, compared to RSG's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, WM is less volatile compared to RSG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.Check RSG's competition here
WM vs WCN Comparison July 2026
WM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 93.7B. In comparison, WCN has a market cap of 42.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $233.18, while WCN trades at $168.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WM currently has a P/E ratio of 30.53, whereas WCN's P/E ratio is 32.08. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.29%, compared to WCN's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WM is more volatile compared to WCN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.Check WCN's competition here
WM vs GFLU Comparison July 2026
WM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 93.7B. In comparison, GFLU has a market cap of 25B. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $233.18, while GFLU trades at $70.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WM currently has a P/E ratio of 30.53, whereas GFLU's P/E ratio is -91.90. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.29%, compared to GFLU's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WM is less volatile compared to GFLU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.Check GFLU's competition here
WM vs CLH Comparison July 2026
WM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 93.7B. In comparison, CLH has a market cap of 16.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $233.18, while CLH trades at $305.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WM currently has a P/E ratio of 30.53, whereas CLH's P/E ratio is 41.34. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.29%, compared to CLH's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WM is less volatile compared to CLH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.Check CLH's competition here
WM vs GFL Comparison July 2026
WM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 93.7B. In comparison, GFL has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $233.18, while GFL trades at $38.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WM currently has a P/E ratio of 30.53, whereas GFL's P/E ratio is 56.38. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.29%, compared to GFL's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WM is less volatile compared to GFL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.Check GFL's competition here
WM vs SRCL Comparison July 2026
WM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 93.7B. In comparison, SRCL has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $233.18, while SRCL trades at $61.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WM currently has a P/E ratio of 30.53, whereas SRCL's P/E ratio is 158.92. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.29%, compared to SRCL's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WM is more volatile compared to SRCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.Check SRCL's competition here
WM vs CWST Comparison July 2026
WM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 93.7B. In comparison, CWST has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $233.18, while CWST trades at $90.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WM currently has a P/E ratio of 30.53, whereas CWST's P/E ratio is 70.73. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.29%, compared to CWST's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WM is less volatile compared to CWST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.Check CWST's competition here
WM vs NVRI Comparison July 2026
WM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 93.7B. In comparison, NVRI has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $233.18, while NVRI trades at $21.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WM currently has a P/E ratio of 30.53, whereas NVRI's P/E ratio is -95.26. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.29%, compared to NVRI's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WM is less volatile compared to NVRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.Check NVRI's competition here
WM vs HCCI Comparison July 2026
WM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 93.7B. In comparison, HCCI has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $233.18, while HCCI trades at $45.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WM currently has a P/E ratio of 30.53, whereas HCCI's P/E ratio is 14.22. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.29%, compared to HCCI's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, WM is more volatile compared to HCCI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.Check HCCI's competition here
WM vs HSC Comparison July 2026
WM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 93.7B. In comparison, HSC has a market cap of 729.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $233.18, while HSC trades at $9.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WM currently has a P/E ratio of 30.53, whereas HSC's P/E ratio is -5.08. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.29%, compared to HSC's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, WM is less volatile compared to HSC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.Check HSC's competition here
WM vs ONT Comparison July 2026
WM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 93.7B. In comparison, ONT has a market cap of 700.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $233.18, while ONT trades at $19.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WM currently has a P/E ratio of 30.53, whereas ONT's P/E ratio is 138.50. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.29%, compared to ONT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WM is less volatile compared to ONT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.Check ONT's competition here
WM vs MEG Comparison July 2026
WM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 93.7B. In comparison, MEG has a market cap of 565.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $233.18, while MEG trades at $15.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WM currently has a P/E ratio of 30.53, whereas MEG's P/E ratio is -120.31. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.29%, compared to MEG's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WM is less volatile compared to MEG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.Check MEG's competition here
WM vs PESI Comparison July 2026
WM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 93.7B. In comparison, PESI has a market cap of 352.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $233.18, while PESI trades at $16.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WM currently has a P/E ratio of 30.53, whereas PESI's P/E ratio is -21.06. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.29%, compared to PESI's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, WM is less volatile compared to PESI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.Check PESI's competition here
WM vs ESGL Comparison July 2026
WM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 93.7B. In comparison, ESGL has a market cap of 80.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $233.18, while ESGL trades at $1.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WM currently has a P/E ratio of 30.53, whereas ESGL's P/E ratio is -31.50. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.29%, compared to ESGL's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WM is more volatile compared to ESGL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.Check ESGL's competition here
WM vs LICY Comparison July 2026
WM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 93.7B. In comparison, LICY has a market cap of 29.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $233.18, while LICY trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WM currently has a P/E ratio of 30.53, whereas LICY's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.29%, compared to LICY's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, WM is less volatile compared to LICY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.Check LICY's competition here
WM vs QRHC Comparison July 2026
WM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 93.7B. In comparison, QRHC has a market cap of 27.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $233.18, while QRHC trades at $1.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WM currently has a P/E ratio of 30.53, whereas QRHC's P/E ratio is -5.37. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.29%, compared to QRHC's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, WM is less volatile compared to QRHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.Check QRHC's competition here
WM vs AMBI Comparison July 2026
WM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 93.7B. In comparison, AMBI has a market cap of 24.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $233.18, while AMBI trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WM currently has a P/E ratio of 30.53, whereas AMBI's P/E ratio is -44.00. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.29%, compared to AMBI's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WM is less volatile compared to AMBI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.Check AMBI's competition here
WM vs CHRA Comparison July 2026
WM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 93.7B. In comparison, CHRA has a market cap of 20.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $233.18, while CHRA trades at $5.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WM currently has a P/E ratio of 30.53, whereas CHRA's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.29%, compared to CHRA's ROE of +20.59%. Regarding short-term risk, WM is more volatile compared to CHRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.Check CHRA's competition here
WM vs LNZA Comparison July 2026
WM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 93.7B. In comparison, LNZA has a market cap of 12.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $233.18, while LNZA trades at $5.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WM currently has a P/E ratio of 30.53, whereas LNZA's P/E ratio is -0.35. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.29%, compared to LNZA's ROE of -12.68%. Regarding short-term risk, WM is less volatile compared to LNZA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.Check LNZA's competition here
WM vs AQMS Comparison July 2026
WM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 93.7B. In comparison, AQMS has a market cap of 10M. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $233.18, while AQMS trades at $2.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WM currently has a P/E ratio of 30.53, whereas AQMS's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.29%, compared to AQMS's ROE of -1.85%. Regarding short-term risk, WM is less volatile compared to AQMS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.Check AQMS's competition here
WM vs AWX Comparison July 2026
WM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 93.7B. In comparison, AWX has a market cap of 9.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $233.18, while AWX trades at $2.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WM currently has a P/E ratio of 30.53, whereas AWX's P/E ratio is 16.87. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.29%, compared to AWX's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WM is less volatile compared to AWX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.Check AWX's competition here
WM vs CHNR Comparison July 2026
WM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 93.7B. In comparison, CHNR has a market cap of 4.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $233.18, while CHNR trades at $3.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WM currently has a P/E ratio of 30.53, whereas CHNR's P/E ratio is -55714.29. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.29%, compared to CHNR's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WM is less volatile compared to CHNR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.Check CHNR's competition here
WM vs GWAV Comparison July 2026
WM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 93.7B. In comparison, GWAV has a market cap of 2.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $233.18, while GWAV trades at $2.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WM currently has a P/E ratio of 30.53, whereas GWAV's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.29%, compared to GWAV's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, WM is less volatile compared to GWAV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.Check GWAV's competition here
WM vs DXST Comparison July 2026
WM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 93.7B. In comparison, DXST has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $233.18, while DXST trades at $2.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WM currently has a P/E ratio of 30.53, whereas DXST's P/E ratio is -4.58. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.29%, compared to DXST's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WM is less volatile compared to DXST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.Check DXST's competition here
WM vs VIVK Comparison July 2026
WM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 93.7B. In comparison, VIVK has a market cap of 954.8K. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $233.18, while VIVK trades at $2.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WM currently has a P/E ratio of 30.53, whereas VIVK's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.29%, compared to VIVK's ROE of -1.72%. Regarding short-term risk, WM is less volatile compared to VIVK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.Check VIVK's competition here
WM vs CWY Comparison July 2026
WM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 93.7B. In comparison, CWY has a market cap of 598.6K. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $233.18, while CWY trades at $17.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WM currently has a P/E ratio of 30.53, whereas CWY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.29%, compared to CWY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WM is more volatile compared to CWY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.Check CWY's competition here
WM vs CDTG Comparison July 2026
WM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 93.7B. In comparison, CDTG has a market cap of 515.1K. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $233.18, while CDTG trades at $1.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WM currently has a P/E ratio of 30.53, whereas CDTG's P/E ratio is -0.41. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.29%, compared to CDTG's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, WM is less volatile compared to CDTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.Check CDTG's competition here
WM vs NES Comparison July 2026
WM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 93.7B. In comparison, NES has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $233.18, while NES trades at $2.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WM currently has a P/E ratio of 30.53, whereas NES's P/E ratio is -1.32. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.29%, compared to NES's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, WM is less volatile compared to NES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.Check NES's competition here
WM vs SMED Comparison July 2026
WM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 93.7B. In comparison, SMED has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $233.18, while SMED trades at $8.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WM currently has a P/E ratio of 30.53, whereas SMED's P/E ratio is 36.46. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.29%, compared to SMED's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, WM is more volatile compared to SMED. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.Check SMED's competition here
WM vs ECOLW Comparison July 2026
WM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 93.7B. In comparison, ECOLW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $233.18, while ECOLW trades at $5.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WM currently has a P/E ratio of 30.53, whereas ECOLW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.29%, compared to ECOLW's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WM is more volatile compared to ECOLW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.Check ECOLW's competition here
WM vs ECOL Comparison July 2026
WM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 93.7B. In comparison, ECOL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $233.18, while ECOL trades at $47.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WM currently has a P/E ratio of 30.53, whereas ECOL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.29%, compared to ECOL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WM is more volatile compared to ECOL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.Check ECOL's competition here
WM vs CVA Comparison July 2026
WM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 93.7B. In comparison, CVA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $233.18, while CVA trades at $20.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WM currently has a P/E ratio of 30.53, whereas CVA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.29%, compared to CVA's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WM is more volatile compared to CVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.Check CVA's competition here