Republic Services, Inc.

RSG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RSG stands at 66B. In comparison, WM has a market cap of 93.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RSG is priced at $213.48, while WM trades at $231.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RSG currently has a P/E ratio of 31.16, whereas WM's P/E ratio is 34.53. In terms of profitability, RSG's ROE is +0.18%, compared to WM's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, RSG is more volatile compared to WM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSG.Check WM's competition here

RSG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RSG stands at 66B. In comparison, WCN has a market cap of 41.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RSG is priced at $213.48, while WCN trades at $161.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RSG currently has a P/E ratio of 31.16, whereas WCN's P/E ratio is 38.78. In terms of profitability, RSG's ROE is +0.18%, compared to WCN's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RSG is more volatile compared to WCN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSG.Check WCN's competition here

RSG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RSG stands at 66B. In comparison, GFLU has a market cap of 25B. Regarding current trading prices, RSG is priced at $213.48, while GFLU trades at $70.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RSG currently has a P/E ratio of 31.16, whereas GFLU's P/E ratio is -91.90. In terms of profitability, RSG's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GFLU's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RSG is less volatile compared to GFLU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSG.Check GFLU's competition here

RSG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RSG stands at 66B. In comparison, CLH has a market cap of 16.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RSG is priced at $213.48, while CLH trades at $303.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RSG currently has a P/E ratio of 31.16, whereas CLH's P/E ratio is 41.64. In terms of profitability, RSG's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CLH's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RSG is less volatile compared to CLH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSG.Check CLH's competition here

RSG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RSG stands at 66B. In comparison, GFL has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RSG is priced at $213.48, while GFL trades at $38.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RSG currently has a P/E ratio of 31.16, whereas GFL's P/E ratio is 97.38. In terms of profitability, RSG's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GFL's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, RSG is less volatile compared to GFL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSG.Check GFL's competition here

RSG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RSG stands at 66B. In comparison, SRCL has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RSG is priced at $213.48, while SRCL trades at $61.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RSG currently has a P/E ratio of 31.16, whereas SRCL's P/E ratio is 158.92. In terms of profitability, RSG's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SRCL's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RSG is more volatile compared to SRCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSG.Check SRCL's competition here

RSG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RSG stands at 66B. In comparison, CWST has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RSG is priced at $213.48, while CWST trades at $84.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RSG currently has a P/E ratio of 31.16, whereas CWST's P/E ratio is 707.42. In terms of profitability, RSG's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CWST's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RSG is less volatile compared to CWST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSG.Check CWST's competition here

RSG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RSG stands at 66B. In comparison, NVRI has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RSG is priced at $213.48, while NVRI trades at $19.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RSG currently has a P/E ratio of 31.16, whereas NVRI's P/E ratio is -9.49. In terms of profitability, RSG's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NVRI's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, RSG is less volatile compared to NVRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSG.Check NVRI's competition here

RSG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RSG stands at 66B. In comparison, HCCI has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RSG is priced at $213.48, while HCCI trades at $45.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RSG currently has a P/E ratio of 31.16, whereas HCCI's P/E ratio is 14.22. In terms of profitability, RSG's ROE is +0.18%, compared to HCCI's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, RSG is more volatile compared to HCCI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSG.Check HCCI's competition here

RSG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RSG stands at 66B. In comparison, MEG has a market cap of 774.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RSG is priced at $213.48, while MEG trades at $21.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RSG currently has a P/E ratio of 31.16, whereas MEG's P/E ratio is -153.71. In terms of profitability, RSG's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MEG's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RSG is less volatile compared to MEG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSG.Check MEG's competition here

RSG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RSG stands at 66B. In comparison, HSC has a market cap of 729.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RSG is priced at $213.48, while HSC trades at $9.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RSG currently has a P/E ratio of 31.16, whereas HSC's P/E ratio is -5.08. In terms of profitability, RSG's ROE is +0.18%, compared to HSC's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, RSG is less volatile compared to HSC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSG.Check HSC's competition here

RSG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RSG stands at 66B. In comparison, PESI has a market cap of 225.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RSG is priced at $213.48, while PESI trades at $12.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RSG currently has a P/E ratio of 31.16, whereas PESI's P/E ratio is -20.93. In terms of profitability, RSG's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PESI's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, RSG is less volatile compared to PESI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSG.Check PESI's competition here

RSG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RSG stands at 66B. In comparison, YDDL has a market cap of 212.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RSG is priced at $213.48, while YDDL trades at $4.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RSG currently has a P/E ratio of 31.16, whereas YDDL's P/E ratio is 32.13. In terms of profitability, RSG's ROE is +0.18%, compared to YDDL's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, RSG is less volatile compared to YDDL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSG.Check YDDL's competition here

RSG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RSG stands at 66B. In comparison, JAN has a market cap of 208.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RSG is priced at $213.48, while JAN trades at $23.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RSG currently has a P/E ratio of 31.16, whereas JAN's P/E ratio is -70.44. In terms of profitability, RSG's ROE is +0.18%, compared to JAN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RSG is less volatile compared to JAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSG.Check JAN's competition here

RSG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RSG stands at 66B. In comparison, ESGL has a market cap of 136.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RSG is priced at $213.48, while ESGL trades at $3.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RSG currently has a P/E ratio of 31.16, whereas ESGL's P/E ratio is -53.83. In terms of profitability, RSG's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ESGL's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RSG is less volatile compared to ESGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSG.Check ESGL's competition here

RSG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RSG stands at 66B. In comparison, LNZA has a market cap of 74.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RSG is priced at $213.48, while LNZA trades at $34.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RSG currently has a P/E ratio of 31.16, whereas LNZA's P/E ratio is -1.53. In terms of profitability, RSG's ROE is +0.18%, compared to LNZA's ROE of +5.56%. Regarding short-term risk, RSG is less volatile compared to LNZA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSG.Check LNZA's competition here

RSG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RSG stands at 66B. In comparison, LICY has a market cap of 29.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RSG is priced at $213.48, while LICY trades at $0.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RSG currently has a P/E ratio of 31.16, whereas LICY's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, RSG's ROE is +0.18%, compared to LICY's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, RSG is less volatile compared to LICY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSG.Check LICY's competition here

RSG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RSG stands at 66B. In comparison, QRHC has a market cap of 24.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RSG is priced at $213.48, while QRHC trades at $1.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RSG currently has a P/E ratio of 31.16, whereas QRHC's P/E ratio is -1.60. In terms of profitability, RSG's ROE is +0.18%, compared to QRHC's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, RSG is less volatile compared to QRHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSG.Check QRHC's competition here

RSG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RSG stands at 66B. In comparison, AMBI has a market cap of 24.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RSG is priced at $213.48, while AMBI trades at $0.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RSG currently has a P/E ratio of 31.16, whereas AMBI's P/E ratio is -44.00. In terms of profitability, RSG's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AMBI's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RSG is less volatile compared to AMBI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSG.Check AMBI's competition here

RSG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RSG stands at 66B. In comparison, CHRA has a market cap of 20.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RSG is priced at $213.48, while CHRA trades at $5.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RSG currently has a P/E ratio of 31.16, whereas CHRA's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, RSG's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CHRA's ROE of +20.59%. Regarding short-term risk, RSG is more volatile compared to CHRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSG.Check CHRA's competition here

RSG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RSG stands at 66B. In comparison, ENGS has a market cap of 17.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RSG is priced at $213.48, while ENGS trades at $1.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RSG currently has a P/E ratio of 31.16, whereas ENGS's P/E ratio is -5.35. In terms of profitability, RSG's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ENGS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, RSG is less volatile compared to ENGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSG.Check ENGS's competition here

RSG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RSG stands at 66B. In comparison, AQMS has a market cap of 13.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RSG is priced at $213.48, while AQMS trades at $3.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RSG currently has a P/E ratio of 31.16, whereas AQMS's P/E ratio is -0.26. In terms of profitability, RSG's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AQMS's ROE of -2.52%. Regarding short-term risk, RSG is less volatile compared to AQMS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSG.Check AQMS's competition here

RSG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RSG stands at 66B. In comparison, AWX has a market cap of 10.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RSG is priced at $213.48, while AWX trades at $2.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RSG currently has a P/E ratio of 31.16, whereas AWX's P/E ratio is 32.50. In terms of profitability, RSG's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AWX's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RSG is more volatile compared to AWX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSG.Check AWX's competition here

RSG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RSG stands at 66B. In comparison, CDTG has a market cap of 4.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RSG is priced at $213.48, while CDTG trades at $0.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RSG currently has a P/E ratio of 31.16, whereas CDTG's P/E ratio is -3.31. In terms of profitability, RSG's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CDTG's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RSG is less volatile compared to CDTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSG.Check CDTG's competition here

RSG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RSG stands at 66B. In comparison, CHNR has a market cap of 4.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RSG is priced at $213.48, while CHNR trades at $3.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RSG currently has a P/E ratio of 31.16, whereas CHNR's P/E ratio is -7.56. In terms of profitability, RSG's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CHNR's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RSG is less volatile compared to CHNR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSG.Check CHNR's competition here

RSG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RSG stands at 66B. In comparison, GWAV has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RSG is priced at $213.48, while GWAV trades at $3.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RSG currently has a P/E ratio of 31.16, whereas GWAV's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, RSG's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GWAV's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, RSG is less volatile compared to GWAV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSG.Check GWAV's competition here

RSG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RSG stands at 66B. In comparison, DXST has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RSG is priced at $213.48, while DXST trades at $2.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RSG currently has a P/E ratio of 31.16, whereas DXST's P/E ratio is -5.94. In terms of profitability, RSG's ROE is +0.18%, compared to DXST's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RSG is less volatile compared to DXST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSG.Check DXST's competition here

RSG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RSG stands at 66B. In comparison, NES has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RSG is priced at $213.48, while NES trades at $2.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RSG currently has a P/E ratio of 31.16, whereas NES's P/E ratio is -1.32. In terms of profitability, RSG's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NES's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, RSG is less volatile compared to NES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSG.Check NES's competition here

RSG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RSG stands at 66B. In comparison, ECOL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RSG is priced at $213.48, while ECOL trades at $47.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RSG currently has a P/E ratio of 31.16, whereas ECOL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RSG's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ECOL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RSG is more volatile compared to ECOL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSG.Check ECOL's competition here

RSG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RSG stands at 66B. In comparison, SMED has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RSG is priced at $213.48, while SMED trades at $8.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RSG currently has a P/E ratio of 31.16, whereas SMED's P/E ratio is 36.46. In terms of profitability, RSG's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SMED's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, RSG is more volatile compared to SMED. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSG.Check SMED's competition here

RSG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RSG stands at 66B. In comparison, ECOLW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RSG is priced at $213.48, while ECOLW trades at $5.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RSG currently has a P/E ratio of 31.16, whereas ECOLW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RSG's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ECOLW's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RSG is more volatile compared to ECOLW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSG.Check ECOLW's competition here

RSG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RSG stands at 66B. In comparison, CVA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RSG is priced at $213.48, while CVA trades at $20.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RSG currently has a P/E ratio of 31.16, whereas CVA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RSG's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CVA's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RSG is more volatile compared to CVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSG.Check CVA's competition here