Aqua Metals, Inc. (AQMS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (AQMS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Waste Management Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AQMS | $2.85 | +8.79% | 10M | -0.13 | -$21.45 | N/A |
| WM | $233.85 | -2.28% | 96B | 31.30 | $7.64 | +1.48% |
| RSG | $214.76 | -3.40% | 67.9B | 30.93 | $7.13 | +1.13% |
| WCN | $168.12 | -2.20% | 43.4B | 32.56 | $5.25 | +0.80% |
| GFLU | $70.30 | +4.32% | 25B | -91.90 | -$0.77 | N/A |
| CLH | $302.28 | -2.67% | 16.4B | 42.04 | $7.38 | N/A |
| GFL | $38.94 | -1.57% | 13.7B | 57.54 | $0.68 | +0.16% |
| CWST | $90.83 | -5.09% | 5.9B | 73.10 | $1.28 | N/A |
| SRCL | $61.98 | +0.83% | 5.8B | 158.92 | $0.39 | N/A |
| NVRI | $21.86 | -4.58% | 1.8B | -96.09 | -$0.23 | +66.61% |
Stock Comparison
AQMS vs WM Comparison July 2026
AQMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AQMS stands at 10M. In comparison, WM has a market cap of 96B. Regarding current trading prices, AQMS is priced at $2.85, while WM trades at $233.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AQMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.13, whereas WM's P/E ratio is 31.30. In terms of profitability, AQMS's ROE is -1.85%, compared to WM's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, AQMS is more volatile compared to WM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQMS.Check WM's competition here
AQMS vs RSG Comparison July 2026
AQMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AQMS stands at 10M. In comparison, RSG has a market cap of 67.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AQMS is priced at $2.85, while RSG trades at $214.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AQMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.13, whereas RSG's P/E ratio is 30.93. In terms of profitability, AQMS's ROE is -1.85%, compared to RSG's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, AQMS is more volatile compared to RSG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQMS.Check RSG's competition here
AQMS vs WCN Comparison July 2026
AQMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AQMS stands at 10M. In comparison, WCN has a market cap of 43.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AQMS is priced at $2.85, while WCN trades at $168.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AQMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.13, whereas WCN's P/E ratio is 32.56. In terms of profitability, AQMS's ROE is -1.85%, compared to WCN's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AQMS is more volatile compared to WCN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQMS.Check WCN's competition here
AQMS vs GFLU Comparison July 2026
AQMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AQMS stands at 10M. In comparison, GFLU has a market cap of 25B. Regarding current trading prices, AQMS is priced at $2.85, while GFLU trades at $70.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AQMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.13, whereas GFLU's P/E ratio is -91.90. In terms of profitability, AQMS's ROE is -1.85%, compared to GFLU's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AQMS is less volatile compared to GFLU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQMS.Check GFLU's competition here
AQMS vs CLH Comparison July 2026
AQMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AQMS stands at 10M. In comparison, CLH has a market cap of 16.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AQMS is priced at $2.85, while CLH trades at $302.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AQMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.13, whereas CLH's P/E ratio is 42.04. In terms of profitability, AQMS's ROE is -1.85%, compared to CLH's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AQMS is less volatile compared to CLH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQMS.Check CLH's competition here
AQMS vs GFL Comparison July 2026
AQMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AQMS stands at 10M. In comparison, GFL has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AQMS is priced at $2.85, while GFL trades at $38.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AQMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.13, whereas GFL's P/E ratio is 57.54. In terms of profitability, AQMS's ROE is -1.85%, compared to GFL's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AQMS is more volatile compared to GFL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQMS.Check GFL's competition here
AQMS vs CWST Comparison July 2026
AQMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AQMS stands at 10M. In comparison, CWST has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AQMS is priced at $2.85, while CWST trades at $90.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AQMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.13, whereas CWST's P/E ratio is 73.10. In terms of profitability, AQMS's ROE is -1.85%, compared to CWST's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AQMS is less volatile compared to CWST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQMS.Check CWST's competition here
AQMS vs SRCL Comparison July 2026
AQMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AQMS stands at 10M. In comparison, SRCL has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AQMS is priced at $2.85, while SRCL trades at $61.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AQMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.13, whereas SRCL's P/E ratio is 158.92. In terms of profitability, AQMS's ROE is -1.85%, compared to SRCL's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AQMS is more volatile compared to SRCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQMS.Check SRCL's competition here
AQMS vs NVRI Comparison July 2026
AQMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AQMS stands at 10M. In comparison, NVRI has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AQMS is priced at $2.85, while NVRI trades at $21.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AQMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.13, whereas NVRI's P/E ratio is -96.09. In terms of profitability, AQMS's ROE is -1.85%, compared to NVRI's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AQMS is less volatile compared to NVRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQMS.Check NVRI's competition here
AQMS vs HCCI Comparison July 2026
AQMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AQMS stands at 10M. In comparison, HCCI has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AQMS is priced at $2.85, while HCCI trades at $45.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AQMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.13, whereas HCCI's P/E ratio is 14.22. In terms of profitability, AQMS's ROE is -1.85%, compared to HCCI's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, AQMS is more volatile compared to HCCI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQMS.Check HCCI's competition here
AQMS vs HSC Comparison July 2026
AQMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AQMS stands at 10M. In comparison, HSC has a market cap of 729.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AQMS is priced at $2.85, while HSC trades at $9.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AQMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.13, whereas HSC's P/E ratio is -5.08. In terms of profitability, AQMS's ROE is -1.85%, compared to HSC's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, AQMS is less volatile compared to HSC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQMS.Check HSC's competition here
AQMS vs ONT Comparison July 2026
AQMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AQMS stands at 10M. In comparison, ONT has a market cap of 717.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AQMS is priced at $2.85, while ONT trades at $18.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AQMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.13, whereas ONT's P/E ratio is 141.75. In terms of profitability, AQMS's ROE is -1.85%, compared to ONT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AQMS is less volatile compared to ONT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQMS.Check ONT's competition here
AQMS vs MEG Comparison July 2026
AQMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AQMS stands at 10M. In comparison, MEG has a market cap of 565.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AQMS is priced at $2.85, while MEG trades at $15.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AQMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.13, whereas MEG's P/E ratio is -120.31. In terms of profitability, AQMS's ROE is -1.85%, compared to MEG's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AQMS is less volatile compared to MEG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQMS.Check MEG's competition here
AQMS vs PESI Comparison July 2026
AQMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AQMS stands at 10M. In comparison, PESI has a market cap of 349.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AQMS is priced at $2.85, while PESI trades at $16.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AQMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.13, whereas PESI's P/E ratio is -20.85. In terms of profitability, AQMS's ROE is -1.85%, compared to PESI's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, AQMS is less volatile compared to PESI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQMS.Check PESI's competition here
AQMS vs ESGL Comparison July 2026
AQMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AQMS stands at 10M. In comparison, ESGL has a market cap of 80.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AQMS is priced at $2.85, while ESGL trades at $1.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AQMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.13, whereas ESGL's P/E ratio is -31.50. In terms of profitability, AQMS's ROE is -1.85%, compared to ESGL's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AQMS is more volatile compared to ESGL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQMS.Check ESGL's competition here
AQMS vs LICY Comparison July 2026
AQMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AQMS stands at 10M. In comparison, LICY has a market cap of 29.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AQMS is priced at $2.85, while LICY trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AQMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.13, whereas LICY's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, AQMS's ROE is -1.85%, compared to LICY's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, AQMS is less volatile compared to LICY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQMS.Check LICY's competition here
AQMS vs QRHC Comparison July 2026
AQMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AQMS stands at 10M. In comparison, QRHC has a market cap of 27.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AQMS is priced at $2.85, while QRHC trades at $1.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AQMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.13, whereas QRHC's P/E ratio is -5.46. In terms of profitability, AQMS's ROE is -1.85%, compared to QRHC's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, AQMS is less volatile compared to QRHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQMS.Check QRHC's competition here
AQMS vs AMBI Comparison July 2026
AQMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AQMS stands at 10M. In comparison, AMBI has a market cap of 24.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AQMS is priced at $2.85, while AMBI trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AQMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.13, whereas AMBI's P/E ratio is -44.00. In terms of profitability, AQMS's ROE is -1.85%, compared to AMBI's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AQMS is less volatile compared to AMBI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQMS.Check AMBI's competition here
AQMS vs CHRA Comparison July 2026
AQMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AQMS stands at 10M. In comparison, CHRA has a market cap of 20.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AQMS is priced at $2.85, while CHRA trades at $5.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AQMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.13, whereas CHRA's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, AQMS's ROE is -1.85%, compared to CHRA's ROE of +20.59%. Regarding short-term risk, AQMS is more volatile compared to CHRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQMS.Check CHRA's competition here
AQMS vs LNZA Comparison July 2026
AQMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AQMS stands at 10M. In comparison, LNZA has a market cap of 12.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AQMS is priced at $2.85, while LNZA trades at $5.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AQMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.13, whereas LNZA's P/E ratio is -0.36. In terms of profitability, AQMS's ROE is -1.85%, compared to LNZA's ROE of -12.68%. Regarding short-term risk, AQMS is less volatile compared to LNZA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQMS.Check LNZA's competition here
AQMS vs AWX Comparison July 2026
AQMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AQMS stands at 10M. In comparison, AWX has a market cap of 9.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AQMS is priced at $2.85, while AWX trades at $2.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AQMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.13, whereas AWX's P/E ratio is 16.87. In terms of profitability, AQMS's ROE is -1.85%, compared to AWX's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AQMS is less volatile compared to AWX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQMS.Check AWX's competition here
AQMS vs CHNR Comparison July 2026
AQMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AQMS stands at 10M. In comparison, CHNR has a market cap of 4.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AQMS is priced at $2.85, while CHNR trades at $3.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AQMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.13, whereas CHNR's P/E ratio is -51214.29. In terms of profitability, AQMS's ROE is -1.85%, compared to CHNR's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AQMS is more volatile compared to CHNR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQMS.Check CHNR's competition here
AQMS vs GWAV Comparison July 2026
AQMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AQMS stands at 10M. In comparison, GWAV has a market cap of 2.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AQMS is priced at $2.85, while GWAV trades at $2.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AQMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.13, whereas GWAV's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, AQMS's ROE is -1.85%, compared to GWAV's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, AQMS is more volatile compared to GWAV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQMS.Check GWAV's competition here
AQMS vs DXST Comparison July 2026
AQMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AQMS stands at 10M. In comparison, DXST has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AQMS is priced at $2.85, while DXST trades at $2.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AQMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.13, whereas DXST's P/E ratio is -4.60. In terms of profitability, AQMS's ROE is -1.85%, compared to DXST's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AQMS is less volatile compared to DXST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQMS.Check DXST's competition here
AQMS vs CDTG Comparison July 2026
AQMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AQMS stands at 10M. In comparison, CDTG has a market cap of 687.1K. Regarding current trading prices, AQMS is priced at $2.85, while CDTG trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AQMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.13, whereas CDTG's P/E ratio is -0.55. In terms of profitability, AQMS's ROE is -1.85%, compared to CDTG's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, AQMS is less volatile compared to CDTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQMS.Check CDTG's competition here
AQMS vs VIVK Comparison July 2026
AQMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AQMS stands at 10M. In comparison, VIVK has a market cap of 617.5K. Regarding current trading prices, AQMS is priced at $2.85, while VIVK trades at $6.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AQMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.13, whereas VIVK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AQMS's ROE is -1.85%, compared to VIVK's ROE of -1.72%. Regarding short-term risk, AQMS is less volatile compared to VIVK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQMS.Check VIVK's competition here
AQMS vs CWY Comparison July 2026
AQMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AQMS stands at 10M. In comparison, CWY has a market cap of 596.3K. Regarding current trading prices, AQMS is priced at $2.85, while CWY trades at $17.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AQMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.13, whereas CWY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AQMS's ROE is -1.85%, compared to CWY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AQMS is more volatile compared to CWY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQMS.Check CWY's competition here
AQMS vs CVA Comparison July 2026
AQMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AQMS stands at 10M. In comparison, CVA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AQMS is priced at $2.85, while CVA trades at $20.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AQMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.13, whereas CVA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AQMS's ROE is -1.85%, compared to CVA's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AQMS is more volatile compared to CVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQMS.Check CVA's competition here
AQMS vs NES Comparison July 2026
AQMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AQMS stands at 10M. In comparison, NES has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AQMS is priced at $2.85, while NES trades at $2.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AQMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.13, whereas NES's P/E ratio is -1.32. In terms of profitability, AQMS's ROE is -1.85%, compared to NES's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, AQMS is less volatile compared to NES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQMS.Check NES's competition here
AQMS vs ECOL Comparison July 2026
AQMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AQMS stands at 10M. In comparison, ECOL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AQMS is priced at $2.85, while ECOL trades at $47.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AQMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.13, whereas ECOL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AQMS's ROE is -1.85%, compared to ECOL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AQMS is more volatile compared to ECOL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQMS.Check ECOL's competition here
AQMS vs SMED Comparison July 2026
AQMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AQMS stands at 10M. In comparison, SMED has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AQMS is priced at $2.85, while SMED trades at $8.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AQMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.13, whereas SMED's P/E ratio is 36.46. In terms of profitability, AQMS's ROE is -1.85%, compared to SMED's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, AQMS is more volatile compared to SMED. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQMS.Check SMED's competition here
AQMS vs ECOLW Comparison July 2026
AQMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AQMS stands at 10M. In comparison, ECOLW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AQMS is priced at $2.85, while ECOLW trades at $5.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AQMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.13, whereas ECOLW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AQMS's ROE is -1.85%, compared to ECOLW's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AQMS is more volatile compared to ECOLW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQMS.Check ECOLW's competition here