Aqua Metals, Inc. (AQMS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (AQMS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Waste Management Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AQMS | $3.29 | +1.54% | 11.1M | -0.54 | -$6.10 | N/A |
| WM | $214.60 | -0.58% | 86.2B | 31.06 | $6.91 | +1.65% |
| RSG | $204.94 | -1.20% | 63.1B | 29.45 | $6.96 | +1.20% |
| WCN | $153.97 | -0.74% | 39.1B | 37.55 | $4.10 | +0.89% |
| GFLU | $70.30 | +4.32% | 25B | -91.90 | -$0.77 | N/A |
| CLH | $288.60 | +0.47% | 15.3B | 39.11 | $7.38 | N/A |
| GFL | $35.10 | +0.26% | 12.2B | 97.50 | $0.36 | +0.18% |
| SRCL | $61.98 | +0.83% | 5.8B | 158.92 | $0.39 | N/A |
| CWST | $86.98 | +1.02% | 5.4B | 790.73 | $0.11 | N/A |
| NVRI | $22.01 | +3.97% | 1.8B | -2.69 | -$8.17 | +68.15% |
Stock Comparison
AQMS vs WM Comparison June 2026
AQMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AQMS stands at 11.1M. In comparison, WM has a market cap of 86.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AQMS is priced at $3.29, while WM trades at $214.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AQMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas WM's P/E ratio is 31.06. In terms of profitability, AQMS's ROE is -1.85%, compared to WM's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, AQMS is more volatile compared to WM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQMS.Check WM's competition here
AQMS vs RSG Comparison June 2026
AQMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AQMS stands at 11.1M. In comparison, RSG has a market cap of 63.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AQMS is priced at $3.29, while RSG trades at $204.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AQMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas RSG's P/E ratio is 29.45. In terms of profitability, AQMS's ROE is -1.85%, compared to RSG's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, AQMS is more volatile compared to RSG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQMS.Check RSG's competition here
AQMS vs WCN Comparison June 2026
AQMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AQMS stands at 11.1M. In comparison, WCN has a market cap of 39.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AQMS is priced at $3.29, while WCN trades at $153.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AQMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas WCN's P/E ratio is 37.55. In terms of profitability, AQMS's ROE is -1.85%, compared to WCN's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AQMS is more volatile compared to WCN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQMS.Check WCN's competition here
AQMS vs GFLU Comparison June 2026
AQMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AQMS stands at 11.1M. In comparison, GFLU has a market cap of 25B. Regarding current trading prices, AQMS is priced at $3.29, while GFLU trades at $70.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AQMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas GFLU's P/E ratio is -91.90. In terms of profitability, AQMS's ROE is -1.85%, compared to GFLU's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AQMS is less volatile compared to GFLU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQMS.Check GFLU's competition here
AQMS vs CLH Comparison June 2026
AQMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AQMS stands at 11.1M. In comparison, CLH has a market cap of 15.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AQMS is priced at $3.29, while CLH trades at $288.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AQMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas CLH's P/E ratio is 39.11. In terms of profitability, AQMS's ROE is -1.85%, compared to CLH's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AQMS is more volatile compared to CLH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQMS.Check CLH's competition here
AQMS vs GFL Comparison June 2026
AQMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AQMS stands at 11.1M. In comparison, GFL has a market cap of 12.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AQMS is priced at $3.29, while GFL trades at $35.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AQMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas GFL's P/E ratio is 97.50. In terms of profitability, AQMS's ROE is -1.85%, compared to GFL's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AQMS is more volatile compared to GFL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQMS.Check GFL's competition here
AQMS vs SRCL Comparison June 2026
AQMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AQMS stands at 11.1M. In comparison, SRCL has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AQMS is priced at $3.29, while SRCL trades at $61.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AQMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas SRCL's P/E ratio is 158.92. In terms of profitability, AQMS's ROE is -1.85%, compared to SRCL's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AQMS is more volatile compared to SRCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQMS.Check SRCL's competition here
AQMS vs CWST Comparison June 2026
AQMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AQMS stands at 11.1M. In comparison, CWST has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AQMS is priced at $3.29, while CWST trades at $86.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AQMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas CWST's P/E ratio is 790.73. In terms of profitability, AQMS's ROE is -1.85%, compared to CWST's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AQMS is more volatile compared to CWST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQMS.Check CWST's competition here
AQMS vs NVRI Comparison June 2026
AQMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AQMS stands at 11.1M. In comparison, NVRI has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AQMS is priced at $3.29, while NVRI trades at $22.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AQMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas NVRI's P/E ratio is -2.69. In terms of profitability, AQMS's ROE is -1.85%, compared to NVRI's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AQMS is more volatile compared to NVRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQMS.Check NVRI's competition here
AQMS vs HCCI Comparison June 2026
AQMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AQMS stands at 11.1M. In comparison, HCCI has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AQMS is priced at $3.29, while HCCI trades at $45.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AQMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas HCCI's P/E ratio is 14.22. In terms of profitability, AQMS's ROE is -1.85%, compared to HCCI's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, AQMS is more volatile compared to HCCI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQMS.Check HCCI's competition here
AQMS vs HSC Comparison June 2026
AQMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AQMS stands at 11.1M. In comparison, HSC has a market cap of 729.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AQMS is priced at $3.29, while HSC trades at $9.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AQMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas HSC's P/E ratio is -5.08. In terms of profitability, AQMS's ROE is -1.85%, compared to HSC's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, AQMS is more volatile compared to HSC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQMS.Check HSC's competition here
AQMS vs MEG Comparison June 2026
AQMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AQMS stands at 11.1M. In comparison, MEG has a market cap of 565.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AQMS is priced at $3.29, while MEG trades at $15.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AQMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas MEG's P/E ratio is -120.31. In terms of profitability, AQMS's ROE is -1.85%, compared to MEG's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AQMS is less volatile compared to MEG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQMS.Check MEG's competition here
AQMS vs PESI Comparison June 2026
AQMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AQMS stands at 11.1M. In comparison, PESI has a market cap of 233.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AQMS is priced at $3.29, while PESI trades at $11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AQMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas PESI's P/E ratio is -13.92. In terms of profitability, AQMS's ROE is -1.85%, compared to PESI's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, AQMS is more volatile compared to PESI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQMS.Check PESI's competition here
AQMS vs YDDL Comparison June 2026
AQMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AQMS stands at 11.1M. In comparison, YDDL has a market cap of 121.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AQMS is priced at $3.29, while YDDL trades at $2.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AQMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas YDDL's P/E ratio is 11.52. In terms of profitability, AQMS's ROE is -1.85%, compared to YDDL's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, AQMS is more volatile compared to YDDL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQMS.Check YDDL's competition here
AQMS vs ESGL Comparison June 2026
AQMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AQMS stands at 11.1M. In comparison, ESGL has a market cap of 80.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AQMS is priced at $3.29, while ESGL trades at $1.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AQMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas ESGL's P/E ratio is -31.50. In terms of profitability, AQMS's ROE is -1.85%, compared to ESGL's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AQMS is more volatile compared to ESGL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQMS.Check ESGL's competition here
AQMS vs LICY Comparison June 2026
AQMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AQMS stands at 11.1M. In comparison, LICY has a market cap of 29.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AQMS is priced at $3.29, while LICY trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AQMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas LICY's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, AQMS's ROE is -1.85%, compared to LICY's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, AQMS is less volatile compared to LICY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQMS.Check LICY's competition here
AQMS vs QRHC Comparison June 2026
AQMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AQMS stands at 11.1M. In comparison, QRHC has a market cap of 28.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AQMS is priced at $3.29, while QRHC trades at $1.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AQMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas QRHC's P/E ratio is -3.94. In terms of profitability, AQMS's ROE is -1.85%, compared to QRHC's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, AQMS is less volatile compared to QRHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQMS.Check QRHC's competition here
AQMS vs ENGS Comparison June 2026
AQMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AQMS stands at 11.1M. In comparison, ENGS has a market cap of 26.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AQMS is priced at $3.29, while ENGS trades at $1.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AQMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas ENGS's P/E ratio is -8.09. In terms of profitability, AQMS's ROE is -1.85%, compared to ENGS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, AQMS is less volatile compared to ENGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQMS.Check ENGS's competition here
AQMS vs AMBI Comparison June 2026
AQMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AQMS stands at 11.1M. In comparison, AMBI has a market cap of 24.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AQMS is priced at $3.29, while AMBI trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AQMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas AMBI's P/E ratio is -44.00. In terms of profitability, AQMS's ROE is -1.85%, compared to AMBI's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AQMS is less volatile compared to AMBI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQMS.Check AMBI's competition here
AQMS vs CHRA Comparison June 2026
AQMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AQMS stands at 11.1M. In comparison, CHRA has a market cap of 20.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AQMS is priced at $3.29, while CHRA trades at $5.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AQMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas CHRA's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, AQMS's ROE is -1.85%, compared to CHRA's ROE of +20.59%. Regarding short-term risk, AQMS is more volatile compared to CHRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQMS.Check CHRA's competition here
AQMS vs LNZA Comparison June 2026
AQMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AQMS stands at 11.1M. In comparison, LNZA has a market cap of 13.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AQMS is priced at $3.29, while LNZA trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AQMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas LNZA's P/E ratio is -0.42. In terms of profitability, AQMS's ROE is -1.85%, compared to LNZA's ROE of -12.68%. Regarding short-term risk, AQMS is less volatile compared to LNZA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQMS.Check LNZA's competition here
AQMS vs AWX Comparison June 2026
AQMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AQMS stands at 11.1M. In comparison, AWX has a market cap of 9.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AQMS is priced at $3.29, while AWX trades at $2.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AQMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas AWX's P/E ratio is 17.36. In terms of profitability, AQMS's ROE is -1.85%, compared to AWX's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AQMS is more volatile compared to AWX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQMS.Check AWX's competition here
AQMS vs CHNR Comparison June 2026
AQMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AQMS stands at 11.1M. In comparison, CHNR has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AQMS is priced at $3.29, while CHNR trades at $4.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AQMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas CHNR's P/E ratio is -30.71. In terms of profitability, AQMS's ROE is -1.85%, compared to CHNR's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AQMS is less volatile compared to CHNR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQMS.Check CHNR's competition here
AQMS vs GWAV Comparison June 2026
AQMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AQMS stands at 11.1M. In comparison, GWAV has a market cap of 2.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AQMS is priced at $3.29, while GWAV trades at $3.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AQMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas GWAV's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, AQMS's ROE is -1.85%, compared to GWAV's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, AQMS is less volatile compared to GWAV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQMS.Check GWAV's competition here
AQMS vs DXST Comparison June 2026
AQMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AQMS stands at 11.1M. In comparison, DXST has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AQMS is priced at $3.29, while DXST trades at $2.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AQMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas DXST's P/E ratio is -5.36. In terms of profitability, AQMS's ROE is -1.85%, compared to DXST's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AQMS is less volatile compared to DXST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQMS.Check DXST's competition here
AQMS vs CDTG Comparison June 2026
AQMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AQMS stands at 11.1M. In comparison, CDTG has a market cap of 879.1K. Regarding current trading prices, AQMS is priced at $3.29, while CDTG trades at $1.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AQMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas CDTG's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, AQMS's ROE is -1.85%, compared to CDTG's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, AQMS is less volatile compared to CDTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQMS.Check CDTG's competition here
AQMS vs ECOL Comparison June 2026
AQMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AQMS stands at 11.1M. In comparison, ECOL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AQMS is priced at $3.29, while ECOL trades at $47.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AQMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas ECOL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AQMS's ROE is -1.85%, compared to ECOL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AQMS is more volatile compared to ECOL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQMS.Check ECOL's competition here
AQMS vs NES Comparison June 2026
AQMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AQMS stands at 11.1M. In comparison, NES has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AQMS is priced at $3.29, while NES trades at $2.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AQMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas NES's P/E ratio is -1.32. In terms of profitability, AQMS's ROE is -1.85%, compared to NES's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, AQMS is less volatile compared to NES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQMS.Check NES's competition here
AQMS vs CVA Comparison June 2026
AQMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AQMS stands at 11.1M. In comparison, CVA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AQMS is priced at $3.29, while CVA trades at $20.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AQMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas CVA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AQMS's ROE is -1.85%, compared to CVA's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AQMS is more volatile compared to CVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQMS.Check CVA's competition here
AQMS vs SMED Comparison June 2026
AQMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AQMS stands at 11.1M. In comparison, SMED has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AQMS is priced at $3.29, while SMED trades at $8.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AQMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas SMED's P/E ratio is 36.46. In terms of profitability, AQMS's ROE is -1.85%, compared to SMED's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, AQMS is more volatile compared to SMED. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQMS.Check SMED's competition here
AQMS vs ECOLW Comparison June 2026
AQMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AQMS stands at 11.1M. In comparison, ECOLW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AQMS is priced at $3.29, while ECOLW trades at $5.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AQMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas ECOLW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AQMS's ROE is -1.85%, compared to ECOLW's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AQMS is more volatile compared to ECOLW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AQMS.Check ECOLW's competition here