LanzaTech Global, Inc.
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for LNZA
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for LNZA
LanzaTech Global, Inc. (LNZA) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (LNZA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Waste Management Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LNZA | $41.42 | +9.20% | 91M | -1.86 | -$22.27 | N/A |
| WM | $224.93 | -0.95% | 90.7B | 33.62 | $6.69 | +1.51% |
| RSG | $210.87 | -0.41% | 65.2B | 30.79 | $6.85 | +1.17% |
| WCN | $159.80 | +0.13% | 40.9B | 38.34 | $4.17 | +0.84% |
| GFLU | $70.30 | +4.32% | 25B | -91.90 | -$0.77 | N/A |
| CLH | $296.00 | -2.76% | 15.8B | 40.60 | $7.29 | N/A |
| GFL | $39.00 | +1.06% | 13.5B | 105.49 | $0.37 | +0.16% |
| SRCL | $61.98 | +0.83% | 5.8B | 158.92 | $0.39 | N/A |
| CWST | $81.54 | -2.28% | 5.1B | 679.50 | $0.12 | N/A |
| NVRI | $19.55 | -0.53% | 1.6B | -9.63 | -$2.03 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
LNZA vs WM Comparison April 2026
LNZA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNZA stands at 91M. In comparison, WM has a market cap of 90.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LNZA is priced at $41.42, while WM trades at $224.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNZA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.86, whereas WM's P/E ratio is 33.62. In terms of profitability, LNZA's ROE is +5.56%, compared to WM's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, LNZA is more volatile compared to WM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNZA.Check WM's competition here
LNZA vs RSG Comparison April 2026
LNZA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNZA stands at 91M. In comparison, RSG has a market cap of 65.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LNZA is priced at $41.42, while RSG trades at $210.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNZA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.86, whereas RSG's P/E ratio is 30.79. In terms of profitability, LNZA's ROE is +5.56%, compared to RSG's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LNZA is more volatile compared to RSG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNZA.Check RSG's competition here
LNZA vs WCN Comparison April 2026
LNZA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNZA stands at 91M. In comparison, WCN has a market cap of 40.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LNZA is priced at $41.42, while WCN trades at $159.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNZA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.86, whereas WCN's P/E ratio is 38.34. In terms of profitability, LNZA's ROE is +5.56%, compared to WCN's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LNZA is more volatile compared to WCN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNZA.Check WCN's competition here
LNZA vs GFLU Comparison April 2026
LNZA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNZA stands at 91M. In comparison, GFLU has a market cap of 25B. Regarding current trading prices, LNZA is priced at $41.42, while GFLU trades at $70.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNZA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.86, whereas GFLU's P/E ratio is -91.90. In terms of profitability, LNZA's ROE is +5.56%, compared to GFLU's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LNZA is more volatile compared to GFLU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNZA.Check GFLU's competition here
LNZA vs CLH Comparison April 2026
LNZA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNZA stands at 91M. In comparison, CLH has a market cap of 15.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LNZA is priced at $41.42, while CLH trades at $296.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNZA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.86, whereas CLH's P/E ratio is 40.60. In terms of profitability, LNZA's ROE is +5.56%, compared to CLH's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LNZA is more volatile compared to CLH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNZA.Check CLH's competition here
LNZA vs GFL Comparison April 2026
LNZA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNZA stands at 91M. In comparison, GFL has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LNZA is priced at $41.42, while GFL trades at $39.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNZA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.86, whereas GFL's P/E ratio is 105.49. In terms of profitability, LNZA's ROE is +5.56%, compared to GFL's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, LNZA is more volatile compared to GFL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNZA.Check GFL's competition here
LNZA vs SRCL Comparison April 2026
LNZA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNZA stands at 91M. In comparison, SRCL has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LNZA is priced at $41.42, while SRCL trades at $61.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNZA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.86, whereas SRCL's P/E ratio is 158.92. In terms of profitability, LNZA's ROE is +5.56%, compared to SRCL's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LNZA is more volatile compared to SRCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNZA.Check SRCL's competition here
LNZA vs CWST Comparison April 2026
LNZA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNZA stands at 91M. In comparison, CWST has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LNZA is priced at $41.42, while CWST trades at $81.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNZA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.86, whereas CWST's P/E ratio is 679.50. In terms of profitability, LNZA's ROE is +5.56%, compared to CWST's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LNZA is more volatile compared to CWST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNZA.Check CWST's competition here
LNZA vs NVRI Comparison April 2026
LNZA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNZA stands at 91M. In comparison, NVRI has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LNZA is priced at $41.42, while NVRI trades at $19.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNZA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.86, whereas NVRI's P/E ratio is -9.63. In terms of profitability, LNZA's ROE is +5.56%, compared to NVRI's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, LNZA is more volatile compared to NVRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNZA.Check NVRI's competition here
LNZA vs HCCI Comparison April 2026
LNZA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNZA stands at 91M. In comparison, HCCI has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LNZA is priced at $41.42, while HCCI trades at $45.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNZA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.86, whereas HCCI's P/E ratio is 14.22. In terms of profitability, LNZA's ROE is +5.56%, compared to HCCI's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LNZA is more volatile compared to HCCI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNZA.Check HCCI's competition here
LNZA vs MEG Comparison April 2026
LNZA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNZA stands at 91M. In comparison, MEG has a market cap of 761M. Regarding current trading prices, LNZA is priced at $41.42, while MEG trades at $21.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNZA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.86, whereas MEG's P/E ratio is -151.07. In terms of profitability, LNZA's ROE is +5.56%, compared to MEG's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LNZA is more volatile compared to MEG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNZA.Check MEG's competition here
LNZA vs HSC Comparison April 2026
LNZA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNZA stands at 91M. In comparison, HSC has a market cap of 729.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LNZA is priced at $41.42, while HSC trades at $9.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNZA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.86, whereas HSC's P/E ratio is -5.08. In terms of profitability, LNZA's ROE is +5.56%, compared to HSC's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, LNZA is more volatile compared to HSC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNZA.Check HSC's competition here
LNZA vs JAN Comparison April 2026
LNZA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNZA stands at 91M. In comparison, JAN has a market cap of 227.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LNZA is priced at $41.42, while JAN trades at $26.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNZA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.86, whereas JAN's P/E ratio is -76.76. In terms of profitability, LNZA's ROE is +5.56%, compared to JAN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LNZA is more volatile compared to JAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNZA.Check JAN's competition here
LNZA vs PESI Comparison April 2026
LNZA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNZA stands at 91M. In comparison, PESI has a market cap of 226.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LNZA is priced at $41.42, while PESI trades at $12.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNZA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.86, whereas PESI's P/E ratio is -21.02. In terms of profitability, LNZA's ROE is +5.56%, compared to PESI's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LNZA is more volatile compared to PESI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNZA.Check PESI's competition here
LNZA vs YDDL Comparison April 2026
LNZA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNZA stands at 91M. In comparison, YDDL has a market cap of 188.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LNZA is priced at $41.42, while YDDL trades at $4.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNZA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.86, whereas YDDL's P/E ratio is 28.53. In terms of profitability, LNZA's ROE is +5.56%, compared to YDDL's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, LNZA is more volatile compared to YDDL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNZA.Check YDDL's competition here
LNZA vs ESGL Comparison April 2026
LNZA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNZA stands at 91M. In comparison, ESGL has a market cap of 136.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LNZA is priced at $41.42, while ESGL trades at $3.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNZA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.86, whereas ESGL's P/E ratio is -53.83. In terms of profitability, LNZA's ROE is +5.56%, compared to ESGL's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LNZA is more volatile compared to ESGL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNZA.Check ESGL's competition here
LNZA vs LICY Comparison April 2026
LNZA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNZA stands at 91M. In comparison, LICY has a market cap of 29.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LNZA is priced at $41.42, while LICY trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNZA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.86, whereas LICY's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, LNZA's ROE is +5.56%, compared to LICY's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, LNZA is more volatile compared to LICY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNZA.Check LICY's competition here
LNZA vs AMBI Comparison April 2026
LNZA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNZA stands at 91M. In comparison, AMBI has a market cap of 24.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LNZA is priced at $41.42, while AMBI trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNZA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.86, whereas AMBI's P/E ratio is -44.00. In terms of profitability, LNZA's ROE is +5.56%, compared to AMBI's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LNZA is less volatile compared to AMBI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNZA.Check AMBI's competition here
LNZA vs QRHC Comparison April 2026
LNZA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNZA stands at 91M. In comparison, QRHC has a market cap of 23.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LNZA is priced at $41.42, while QRHC trades at $1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNZA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.86, whereas QRHC's P/E ratio is -1.51. In terms of profitability, LNZA's ROE is +5.56%, compared to QRHC's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, LNZA is more volatile compared to QRHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNZA.Check QRHC's competition here
LNZA vs CHRA Comparison April 2026
LNZA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNZA stands at 91M. In comparison, CHRA has a market cap of 20.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LNZA is priced at $41.42, while CHRA trades at $5.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNZA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.86, whereas CHRA's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, LNZA's ROE is +5.56%, compared to CHRA's ROE of +20.59%. Regarding short-term risk, LNZA is more volatile compared to CHRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNZA.Check CHRA's competition here
LNZA vs ENGS Comparison April 2026
LNZA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNZA stands at 91M. In comparison, ENGS has a market cap of 17M. Regarding current trading prices, LNZA is priced at $41.42, while ENGS trades at $1.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNZA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.86, whereas ENGS's P/E ratio is -5.17. In terms of profitability, LNZA's ROE is +5.56%, compared to ENGS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, LNZA is more volatile compared to ENGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNZA.Check ENGS's competition here
LNZA vs AQMS Comparison April 2026
LNZA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNZA stands at 91M. In comparison, AQMS has a market cap of 14.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LNZA is priced at $41.42, while AQMS trades at $4.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNZA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.86, whereas AQMS's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, LNZA's ROE is +5.56%, compared to AQMS's ROE of -2.52%. Regarding short-term risk, LNZA is more volatile compared to AQMS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNZA.Check AQMS's competition here
LNZA vs AWX Comparison April 2026
LNZA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNZA stands at 91M. In comparison, AWX has a market cap of 9.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LNZA is priced at $41.42, while AWX trades at $2.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNZA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.86, whereas AWX's P/E ratio is 31.75. In terms of profitability, LNZA's ROE is +5.56%, compared to AWX's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LNZA is more volatile compared to AWX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNZA.Check AWX's competition here
LNZA vs CHNR Comparison April 2026
LNZA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNZA stands at 91M. In comparison, CHNR has a market cap of 4.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LNZA is priced at $41.42, while CHNR trades at $3.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNZA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.86, whereas CHNR's P/E ratio is -7.44. In terms of profitability, LNZA's ROE is +5.56%, compared to CHNR's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LNZA is more volatile compared to CHNR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNZA.Check CHNR's competition here
LNZA vs CDTG Comparison April 2026
LNZA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNZA stands at 91M. In comparison, CDTG has a market cap of 4.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LNZA is priced at $41.42, while CDTG trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNZA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.86, whereas CDTG's P/E ratio is -3.12. In terms of profitability, LNZA's ROE is +5.56%, compared to CDTG's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LNZA is less volatile compared to CDTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNZA.Check CDTG's competition here
LNZA vs GWAV Comparison April 2026
LNZA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNZA stands at 91M. In comparison, GWAV has a market cap of 3.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LNZA is priced at $41.42, while GWAV trades at $3.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNZA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.86, whereas GWAV's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, LNZA's ROE is +5.56%, compared to GWAV's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, LNZA is more volatile compared to GWAV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNZA.Check GWAV's competition here
LNZA vs DXST Comparison April 2026
LNZA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNZA stands at 91M. In comparison, DXST has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LNZA is priced at $41.42, while DXST trades at $2.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNZA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.86, whereas DXST's P/E ratio is -5.57. In terms of profitability, LNZA's ROE is +5.56%, compared to DXST's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LNZA is more volatile compared to DXST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNZA.Check DXST's competition here
LNZA vs NES Comparison April 2026
LNZA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNZA stands at 91M. In comparison, NES has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LNZA is priced at $41.42, while NES trades at $2.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNZA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.86, whereas NES's P/E ratio is -1.32. In terms of profitability, LNZA's ROE is +5.56%, compared to NES's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, LNZA is less volatile compared to NES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNZA.Check NES's competition here
LNZA vs ECOL Comparison April 2026
LNZA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNZA stands at 91M. In comparison, ECOL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LNZA is priced at $41.42, while ECOL trades at $47.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNZA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.86, whereas ECOL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LNZA's ROE is +5.56%, compared to ECOL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LNZA is more volatile compared to ECOL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNZA.Check ECOL's competition here
LNZA vs SMED Comparison April 2026
LNZA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNZA stands at 91M. In comparison, SMED has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LNZA is priced at $41.42, while SMED trades at $8.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNZA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.86, whereas SMED's P/E ratio is 36.46. In terms of profitability, LNZA's ROE is +5.56%, compared to SMED's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, LNZA is more volatile compared to SMED. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNZA.Check SMED's competition here
LNZA vs ECOLW Comparison April 2026
LNZA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNZA stands at 91M. In comparison, ECOLW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LNZA is priced at $41.42, while ECOLW trades at $5.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNZA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.86, whereas ECOLW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LNZA's ROE is +5.56%, compared to ECOLW's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LNZA is more volatile compared to ECOLW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNZA.Check ECOLW's competition here
LNZA vs CVA Comparison April 2026
LNZA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNZA stands at 91M. In comparison, CVA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LNZA is priced at $41.42, while CVA trades at $20.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNZA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.86, whereas CVA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LNZA's ROE is +5.56%, compared to CVA's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LNZA is more volatile compared to CVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNZA.Check CVA's competition here