GFL Environmental Inc.
GFL Environmental Inc. (GFLU) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (GFLU) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Waste Management Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GFLU | $70.30 | +4.32% | 25B | -91.90 | -$0.77 | N/A |
| WM | $217.90 | +0.07% | 87.5B | 31.78 | $6.86 | +1.58% |
| RSG | $208.93 | +0.40% | 64.3B | 29.97 | $6.97 | +1.18% |
| WCN | $155.71 | -0.04% | 39.6B | 37.99 | $4.10 | +0.88% |
| CLH | $286.92 | +1.54% | 15.2B | 38.91 | $7.37 | N/A |
| GFL | $35.72 | -0.67% | 12.4B | 96.51 | $0.37 | +0.18% |
| SRCL | $61.98 | +0.83% | 5.8B | 158.92 | $0.39 | N/A |
| CWST | $87.41 | +0.22% | 5.5B | 794.64 | $0.11 | N/A |
| NVRI | $19.60 | -1.21% | 1.6B | -9.56 | -$2.05 | N/A |
| HCCI | $45.51 | +0.09% | 1.1B | 14.22 | $3.20 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
GFLU vs WM Comparison May 2026
GFLU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFLU stands at 25B. In comparison, WM has a market cap of 87.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GFLU is priced at $70.30, while WM trades at $217.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFLU currently has a P/E ratio of -91.90, whereas WM's P/E ratio is 31.78. In terms of profitability, GFLU's ROE is N/A, compared to WM's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, GFLU is more volatile compared to WM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFLU.Check WM's competition here
GFLU vs RSG Comparison May 2026
GFLU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFLU stands at 25B. In comparison, RSG has a market cap of 64.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GFLU is priced at $70.30, while RSG trades at $208.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFLU currently has a P/E ratio of -91.90, whereas RSG's P/E ratio is 29.97. In terms of profitability, GFLU's ROE is N/A, compared to RSG's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GFLU is more volatile compared to RSG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFLU.Check RSG's competition here
GFLU vs WCN Comparison May 2026
GFLU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFLU stands at 25B. In comparison, WCN has a market cap of 39.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GFLU is priced at $70.30, while WCN trades at $155.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFLU currently has a P/E ratio of -91.90, whereas WCN's P/E ratio is 37.99. In terms of profitability, GFLU's ROE is N/A, compared to WCN's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GFLU is more volatile compared to WCN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFLU.Check WCN's competition here
GFLU vs CLH Comparison May 2026
GFLU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFLU stands at 25B. In comparison, CLH has a market cap of 15.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GFLU is priced at $70.30, while CLH trades at $286.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFLU currently has a P/E ratio of -91.90, whereas CLH's P/E ratio is 38.91. In terms of profitability, GFLU's ROE is N/A, compared to CLH's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GFLU is more volatile compared to CLH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFLU.Check CLH's competition here
GFLU vs GFL Comparison May 2026
GFLU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFLU stands at 25B. In comparison, GFL has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GFLU is priced at $70.30, while GFL trades at $35.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFLU currently has a P/E ratio of -91.90, whereas GFL's P/E ratio is 96.51. In terms of profitability, GFLU's ROE is N/A, compared to GFL's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GFLU is more volatile compared to GFL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFLU.Check GFL's competition here
GFLU vs SRCL Comparison May 2026
GFLU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFLU stands at 25B. In comparison, SRCL has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GFLU is priced at $70.30, while SRCL trades at $61.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFLU currently has a P/E ratio of -91.90, whereas SRCL's P/E ratio is 158.92. In terms of profitability, GFLU's ROE is N/A, compared to SRCL's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GFLU is more volatile compared to SRCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFLU.Check SRCL's competition here
GFLU vs CWST Comparison May 2026
GFLU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFLU stands at 25B. In comparison, CWST has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GFLU is priced at $70.30, while CWST trades at $87.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFLU currently has a P/E ratio of -91.90, whereas CWST's P/E ratio is 794.64. In terms of profitability, GFLU's ROE is N/A, compared to CWST's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GFLU is more volatile compared to CWST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFLU.Check CWST's competition here
GFLU vs NVRI Comparison May 2026
GFLU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFLU stands at 25B. In comparison, NVRI has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GFLU is priced at $70.30, while NVRI trades at $19.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFLU currently has a P/E ratio of -91.90, whereas NVRI's P/E ratio is -9.56. In terms of profitability, GFLU's ROE is N/A, compared to NVRI's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, GFLU is more volatile compared to NVRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFLU.Check NVRI's competition here
GFLU vs HCCI Comparison May 2026
GFLU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFLU stands at 25B. In comparison, HCCI has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GFLU is priced at $70.30, while HCCI trades at $45.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFLU currently has a P/E ratio of -91.90, whereas HCCI's P/E ratio is 14.22. In terms of profitability, GFLU's ROE is N/A, compared to HCCI's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, GFLU is more volatile compared to HCCI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFLU.Check HCCI's competition here
GFLU vs HSC Comparison May 2026
GFLU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFLU stands at 25B. In comparison, HSC has a market cap of 729.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GFLU is priced at $70.30, while HSC trades at $9.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFLU currently has a P/E ratio of -91.90, whereas HSC's P/E ratio is -5.08. In terms of profitability, GFLU's ROE is N/A, compared to HSC's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, GFLU is more volatile compared to HSC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFLU.Check HSC's competition here
GFLU vs MEG Comparison May 2026
GFLU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFLU stands at 25B. In comparison, MEG has a market cap of 565.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GFLU is priced at $70.30, while MEG trades at $15.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFLU currently has a P/E ratio of -91.90, whereas MEG's P/E ratio is -120.31. In terms of profitability, GFLU's ROE is N/A, compared to MEG's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GFLU is less volatile compared to MEG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFLU.Check MEG's competition here
GFLU vs PESI Comparison May 2026
GFLU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFLU stands at 25B. In comparison, PESI has a market cap of 166.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GFLU is priced at $70.30, while PESI trades at $8.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFLU currently has a P/E ratio of -91.90, whereas PESI's P/E ratio is -11.33. In terms of profitability, GFLU's ROE is N/A, compared to PESI's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, GFLU is more volatile compared to PESI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFLU.Check PESI's competition here
GFLU vs YDDL Comparison May 2026
GFLU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFLU stands at 25B. In comparison, YDDL has a market cap of 151.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GFLU is priced at $70.30, while YDDL trades at $3.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFLU currently has a P/E ratio of -91.90, whereas YDDL's P/E ratio is 15.00. In terms of profitability, GFLU's ROE is N/A, compared to YDDL's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, GFLU is less volatile compared to YDDL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFLU.Check YDDL's competition here
GFLU vs ESGL Comparison May 2026
GFLU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFLU stands at 25B. In comparison, ESGL has a market cap of 80.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GFLU is priced at $70.30, while ESGL trades at $1.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFLU currently has a P/E ratio of -91.90, whereas ESGL's P/E ratio is -31.50. In terms of profitability, GFLU's ROE is N/A, compared to ESGL's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GFLU is more volatile compared to ESGL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFLU.Check ESGL's competition here
GFLU vs LICY Comparison May 2026
GFLU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFLU stands at 25B. In comparison, LICY has a market cap of 29.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GFLU is priced at $70.30, while LICY trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFLU currently has a P/E ratio of -91.90, whereas LICY's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, GFLU's ROE is N/A, compared to LICY's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, GFLU is less volatile compared to LICY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFLU.Check LICY's competition here
GFLU vs AMBI Comparison May 2026
GFLU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFLU stands at 25B. In comparison, AMBI has a market cap of 24.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GFLU is priced at $70.30, while AMBI trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFLU currently has a P/E ratio of -91.90, whereas AMBI's P/E ratio is -44.00. In terms of profitability, GFLU's ROE is N/A, compared to AMBI's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GFLU is less volatile compared to AMBI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFLU.Check AMBI's competition here
GFLU vs QRHC Comparison May 2026
GFLU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFLU stands at 25B. In comparison, QRHC has a market cap of 24.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GFLU is priced at $70.30, while QRHC trades at $1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFLU currently has a P/E ratio of -91.90, whereas QRHC's P/E ratio is -3.38. In terms of profitability, GFLU's ROE is N/A, compared to QRHC's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GFLU is more volatile compared to QRHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFLU.Check QRHC's competition here
GFLU vs ENGS Comparison May 2026
GFLU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFLU stands at 25B. In comparison, ENGS has a market cap of 22.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GFLU is priced at $70.30, while ENGS trades at $1.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFLU currently has a P/E ratio of -91.90, whereas ENGS's P/E ratio is -6.74. In terms of profitability, GFLU's ROE is N/A, compared to ENGS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, GFLU is more volatile compared to ENGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFLU.Check ENGS's competition here
GFLU vs CHRA Comparison May 2026
GFLU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFLU stands at 25B. In comparison, CHRA has a market cap of 20.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GFLU is priced at $70.30, while CHRA trades at $5.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFLU currently has a P/E ratio of -91.90, whereas CHRA's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, GFLU's ROE is N/A, compared to CHRA's ROE of +20.59%. Regarding short-term risk, GFLU is more volatile compared to CHRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFLU.Check CHRA's competition here
GFLU vs LNZA Comparison May 2026
GFLU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFLU stands at 25B. In comparison, LNZA has a market cap of 17.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GFLU is priced at $70.30, while LNZA trades at $7.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFLU currently has a P/E ratio of -91.90, whereas LNZA's P/E ratio is -0.55. In terms of profitability, GFLU's ROE is N/A, compared to LNZA's ROE of -12.68%. Regarding short-term risk, GFLU is less volatile compared to LNZA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFLU.Check LNZA's competition here
GFLU vs AQMS Comparison May 2026
GFLU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFLU stands at 25B. In comparison, AQMS has a market cap of 13.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GFLU is priced at $70.30, while AQMS trades at $3.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFLU currently has a P/E ratio of -91.90, whereas AQMS's P/E ratio is -0.65. In terms of profitability, GFLU's ROE is N/A, compared to AQMS's ROE of -1.85%. Regarding short-term risk, GFLU is more volatile compared to AQMS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFLU.Check AQMS's competition here
GFLU vs AWX Comparison May 2026
GFLU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFLU stands at 25B. In comparison, AWX has a market cap of 9.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GFLU is priced at $70.30, while AWX trades at $2.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFLU currently has a P/E ratio of -91.90, whereas AWX's P/E ratio is 18.14. In terms of profitability, GFLU's ROE is N/A, compared to AWX's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GFLU is more volatile compared to AWX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFLU.Check AWX's competition here
GFLU vs CHNR Comparison May 2026
GFLU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFLU stands at 25B. In comparison, CHNR has a market cap of 5.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GFLU is priced at $70.30, while CHNR trades at $4.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFLU currently has a P/E ratio of -91.90, whereas CHNR's P/E ratio is -28.96. In terms of profitability, GFLU's ROE is N/A, compared to CHNR's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GFLU is more volatile compared to CHNR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFLU.Check CHNR's competition here
GFLU vs CDTG Comparison May 2026
GFLU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFLU stands at 25B. In comparison, CDTG has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GFLU is priced at $70.30, while CDTG trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFLU currently has a P/E ratio of -91.90, whereas CDTG's P/E ratio is -0.37. In terms of profitability, GFLU's ROE is N/A, compared to CDTG's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, GFLU is more volatile compared to CDTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFLU.Check CDTG's competition here
GFLU vs GWAV Comparison May 2026
GFLU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFLU stands at 25B. In comparison, GWAV has a market cap of 3M. Regarding current trading prices, GFLU is priced at $70.30, while GWAV trades at $3.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFLU currently has a P/E ratio of -91.90, whereas GWAV's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, GFLU's ROE is N/A, compared to GWAV's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, GFLU is more volatile compared to GWAV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFLU.Check GWAV's competition here
GFLU vs DXST Comparison May 2026
GFLU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFLU stands at 25B. In comparison, DXST has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GFLU is priced at $70.30, while DXST trades at $1.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFLU currently has a P/E ratio of -91.90, whereas DXST's P/E ratio is -3.66. In terms of profitability, GFLU's ROE is N/A, compared to DXST's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GFLU is more volatile compared to DXST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFLU.Check DXST's competition here
GFLU vs ECOLW Comparison May 2026
GFLU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFLU stands at 25B. In comparison, ECOLW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GFLU is priced at $70.30, while ECOLW trades at $5.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFLU currently has a P/E ratio of -91.90, whereas ECOLW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GFLU's ROE is N/A, compared to ECOLW's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GFLU is more volatile compared to ECOLW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFLU.Check ECOLW's competition here
GFLU vs ECOL Comparison May 2026
GFLU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFLU stands at 25B. In comparison, ECOL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GFLU is priced at $70.30, while ECOL trades at $47.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFLU currently has a P/E ratio of -91.90, whereas ECOL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GFLU's ROE is N/A, compared to ECOL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GFLU is more volatile compared to ECOL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFLU.Check ECOL's competition here
GFLU vs CVA Comparison May 2026
GFLU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFLU stands at 25B. In comparison, CVA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GFLU is priced at $70.30, while CVA trades at $20.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFLU currently has a P/E ratio of -91.90, whereas CVA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GFLU's ROE is N/A, compared to CVA's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GFLU is more volatile compared to CVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFLU.Check CVA's competition here
GFLU vs SMED Comparison May 2026
GFLU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFLU stands at 25B. In comparison, SMED has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GFLU is priced at $70.30, while SMED trades at $8.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFLU currently has a P/E ratio of -91.90, whereas SMED's P/E ratio is 36.46. In terms of profitability, GFLU's ROE is N/A, compared to SMED's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, GFLU is more volatile compared to SMED. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFLU.Check SMED's competition here
GFLU vs NES Comparison May 2026
GFLU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFLU stands at 25B. In comparison, NES has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GFLU is priced at $70.30, while NES trades at $2.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFLU currently has a P/E ratio of -91.90, whereas NES's P/E ratio is -1.32. In terms of profitability, GFLU's ROE is N/A, compared to NES's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, GFLU is less volatile compared to NES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFLU.Check NES's competition here