GFL Environmental Inc. (GFLU) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (GFLU) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Waste Management Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GFLU | $70.30 | +4.32% | 25B | -91.90 | -$0.77 | N/A |
| WM | $239.31 | -1.21% | 96.1B | 31.32 | $7.64 | +1.48% |
| RSG | $222.31 | -0.98% | 68.4B | 31.19 | $7.13 | +1.12% |
| WCN | $171.91 | -1.39% | 43.7B | 32.75 | $5.25 | +0.79% |
| CLH | $310.58 | +0.00% | 16.4B | 42.09 | $7.38 | N/A |
| GFL | $39.56 | -0.18% | 13.8B | 58.16 | $0.68 | +0.16% |
| CWST | $95.70 | -4.21% | 6B | 74.77 | $1.28 | N/A |
| SRCL | $61.98 | +0.83% | 5.8B | 158.92 | $0.39 | N/A |
| NVRI | $22.91 | +0.48% | 1.9B | -99.65 | -$0.23 | +64.99% |
| HCCI | $45.51 | +0.09% | 1.1B | 14.22 | $3.20 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
GFLU vs WM Comparison July 2026
GFLU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFLU stands at 25B. In comparison, WM has a market cap of 96.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GFLU is priced at $70.30, while WM trades at $239.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFLU currently has a P/E ratio of -91.90, whereas WM's P/E ratio is 31.32. In terms of profitability, GFLU's ROE is N/A, compared to WM's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, GFLU is more volatile compared to WM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFLU.Check WM's competition here
GFLU vs RSG Comparison July 2026
GFLU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFLU stands at 25B. In comparison, RSG has a market cap of 68.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GFLU is priced at $70.30, while RSG trades at $222.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFLU currently has a P/E ratio of -91.90, whereas RSG's P/E ratio is 31.19. In terms of profitability, GFLU's ROE is N/A, compared to RSG's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GFLU is more volatile compared to RSG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFLU.Check RSG's competition here
GFLU vs WCN Comparison July 2026
GFLU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFLU stands at 25B. In comparison, WCN has a market cap of 43.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GFLU is priced at $70.30, while WCN trades at $171.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFLU currently has a P/E ratio of -91.90, whereas WCN's P/E ratio is 32.75. In terms of profitability, GFLU's ROE is N/A, compared to WCN's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GFLU is more volatile compared to WCN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFLU.Check WCN's competition here
GFLU vs CLH Comparison July 2026
GFLU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFLU stands at 25B. In comparison, CLH has a market cap of 16.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GFLU is priced at $70.30, while CLH trades at $310.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFLU currently has a P/E ratio of -91.90, whereas CLH's P/E ratio is 42.09. In terms of profitability, GFLU's ROE is N/A, compared to CLH's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GFLU is more volatile compared to CLH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFLU.Check CLH's competition here
GFLU vs GFL Comparison July 2026
GFLU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFLU stands at 25B. In comparison, GFL has a market cap of 13.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GFLU is priced at $70.30, while GFL trades at $39.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFLU currently has a P/E ratio of -91.90, whereas GFL's P/E ratio is 58.16. In terms of profitability, GFLU's ROE is N/A, compared to GFL's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GFLU is more volatile compared to GFL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFLU.Check GFL's competition here
GFLU vs CWST Comparison July 2026
GFLU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFLU stands at 25B. In comparison, CWST has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, GFLU is priced at $70.30, while CWST trades at $95.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFLU currently has a P/E ratio of -91.90, whereas CWST's P/E ratio is 74.77. In terms of profitability, GFLU's ROE is N/A, compared to CWST's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GFLU is more volatile compared to CWST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFLU.Check CWST's competition here
GFLU vs SRCL Comparison July 2026
GFLU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFLU stands at 25B. In comparison, SRCL has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GFLU is priced at $70.30, while SRCL trades at $61.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFLU currently has a P/E ratio of -91.90, whereas SRCL's P/E ratio is 158.92. In terms of profitability, GFLU's ROE is N/A, compared to SRCL's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GFLU is more volatile compared to SRCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFLU.Check SRCL's competition here
GFLU vs NVRI Comparison July 2026
GFLU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFLU stands at 25B. In comparison, NVRI has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GFLU is priced at $70.30, while NVRI trades at $22.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFLU currently has a P/E ratio of -91.90, whereas NVRI's P/E ratio is -99.65. In terms of profitability, GFLU's ROE is N/A, compared to NVRI's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GFLU is more volatile compared to NVRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFLU.Check NVRI's competition here
GFLU vs HCCI Comparison July 2026
GFLU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFLU stands at 25B. In comparison, HCCI has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GFLU is priced at $70.30, while HCCI trades at $45.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFLU currently has a P/E ratio of -91.90, whereas HCCI's P/E ratio is 14.22. In terms of profitability, GFLU's ROE is N/A, compared to HCCI's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, GFLU is more volatile compared to HCCI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFLU.Check HCCI's competition here
GFLU vs ONT Comparison July 2026
GFLU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFLU stands at 25B. In comparison, ONT has a market cap of 756.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GFLU is priced at $70.30, while ONT trades at $20.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFLU currently has a P/E ratio of -91.90, whereas ONT's P/E ratio is 149.50. In terms of profitability, GFLU's ROE is N/A, compared to ONT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GFLU is more volatile compared to ONT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFLU.Check ONT's competition here
GFLU vs HSC Comparison July 2026
GFLU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFLU stands at 25B. In comparison, HSC has a market cap of 729.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GFLU is priced at $70.30, while HSC trades at $9.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFLU currently has a P/E ratio of -91.90, whereas HSC's P/E ratio is -5.08. In terms of profitability, GFLU's ROE is N/A, compared to HSC's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, GFLU is more volatile compared to HSC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFLU.Check HSC's competition here
GFLU vs MEG Comparison July 2026
GFLU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFLU stands at 25B. In comparison, MEG has a market cap of 565.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GFLU is priced at $70.30, while MEG trades at $15.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFLU currently has a P/E ratio of -91.90, whereas MEG's P/E ratio is -120.31. In terms of profitability, GFLU's ROE is N/A, compared to MEG's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GFLU is less volatile compared to MEG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFLU.Check MEG's competition here
GFLU vs PESI Comparison July 2026
GFLU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFLU stands at 25B. In comparison, PESI has a market cap of 370.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GFLU is priced at $70.30, while PESI trades at $17.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFLU currently has a P/E ratio of -91.90, whereas PESI's P/E ratio is -22.10. In terms of profitability, GFLU's ROE is N/A, compared to PESI's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, GFLU is less volatile compared to PESI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFLU.Check PESI's competition here
GFLU vs ESGL Comparison July 2026
GFLU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFLU stands at 25B. In comparison, ESGL has a market cap of 80.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GFLU is priced at $70.30, while ESGL trades at $1.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFLU currently has a P/E ratio of -91.90, whereas ESGL's P/E ratio is -31.50. In terms of profitability, GFLU's ROE is N/A, compared to ESGL's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GFLU is more volatile compared to ESGL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFLU.Check ESGL's competition here
GFLU vs LICY Comparison July 2026
GFLU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFLU stands at 25B. In comparison, LICY has a market cap of 29.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GFLU is priced at $70.30, while LICY trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFLU currently has a P/E ratio of -91.90, whereas LICY's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, GFLU's ROE is N/A, compared to LICY's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, GFLU is less volatile compared to LICY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFLU.Check LICY's competition here
GFLU vs QRHC Comparison July 2026
GFLU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFLU stands at 25B. In comparison, QRHC has a market cap of 28.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GFLU is priced at $70.30, while QRHC trades at $1.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFLU currently has a P/E ratio of -91.90, whereas QRHC's P/E ratio is -5.63. In terms of profitability, GFLU's ROE is N/A, compared to QRHC's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GFLU is more volatile compared to QRHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFLU.Check QRHC's competition here
GFLU vs AMBI Comparison July 2026
GFLU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFLU stands at 25B. In comparison, AMBI has a market cap of 24.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GFLU is priced at $70.30, while AMBI trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFLU currently has a P/E ratio of -91.90, whereas AMBI's P/E ratio is -44.00. In terms of profitability, GFLU's ROE is N/A, compared to AMBI's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GFLU is less volatile compared to AMBI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFLU.Check AMBI's competition here
GFLU vs CHRA Comparison July 2026
GFLU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFLU stands at 25B. In comparison, CHRA has a market cap of 20.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GFLU is priced at $70.30, while CHRA trades at $5.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFLU currently has a P/E ratio of -91.90, whereas CHRA's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, GFLU's ROE is N/A, compared to CHRA's ROE of +20.59%. Regarding short-term risk, GFLU is more volatile compared to CHRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFLU.Check CHRA's competition here
GFLU vs LNZA Comparison July 2026
GFLU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFLU stands at 25B. In comparison, LNZA has a market cap of 12.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GFLU is priced at $70.30, while LNZA trades at $5.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFLU currently has a P/E ratio of -91.90, whereas LNZA's P/E ratio is -0.35. In terms of profitability, GFLU's ROE is N/A, compared to LNZA's ROE of -12.68%. Regarding short-term risk, GFLU is more volatile compared to LNZA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFLU.Check LNZA's competition here
GFLU vs AWX Comparison July 2026
GFLU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFLU stands at 25B. In comparison, AWX has a market cap of 10.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GFLU is priced at $70.30, while AWX trades at $2.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFLU currently has a P/E ratio of -91.90, whereas AWX's P/E ratio is 17.27. In terms of profitability, GFLU's ROE is N/A, compared to AWX's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GFLU is more volatile compared to AWX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFLU.Check AWX's competition here
GFLU vs AQMS Comparison July 2026
GFLU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFLU stands at 25B. In comparison, AQMS has a market cap of 9.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GFLU is priced at $70.30, while AQMS trades at $2.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFLU currently has a P/E ratio of -91.90, whereas AQMS's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, GFLU's ROE is N/A, compared to AQMS's ROE of -1.85%. Regarding short-term risk, GFLU is more volatile compared to AQMS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFLU.Check AQMS's competition here
GFLU vs CHNR Comparison July 2026
GFLU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFLU stands at 25B. In comparison, CHNR has a market cap of 4.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GFLU is priced at $70.30, while CHNR trades at $3.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFLU currently has a P/E ratio of -91.90, whereas CHNR's P/E ratio is -51428.57. In terms of profitability, GFLU's ROE is N/A, compared to CHNR's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GFLU is more volatile compared to CHNR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFLU.Check CHNR's competition here
GFLU vs GWAV Comparison July 2026
GFLU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFLU stands at 25B. In comparison, GWAV has a market cap of 2.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GFLU is priced at $70.30, while GWAV trades at $2.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFLU currently has a P/E ratio of -91.90, whereas GWAV's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, GFLU's ROE is N/A, compared to GWAV's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, GFLU is more volatile compared to GWAV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFLU.Check GWAV's competition here
GFLU vs DXST Comparison July 2026
GFLU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFLU stands at 25B. In comparison, DXST has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GFLU is priced at $70.30, while DXST trades at $2.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFLU currently has a P/E ratio of -91.90, whereas DXST's P/E ratio is -5.30. In terms of profitability, GFLU's ROE is N/A, compared to DXST's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GFLU is less volatile compared to DXST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFLU.Check DXST's competition here
GFLU vs CDTG Comparison July 2026
GFLU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFLU stands at 25B. In comparison, CDTG has a market cap of 968.4K. Regarding current trading prices, GFLU is priced at $70.30, while CDTG trades at $1.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFLU currently has a P/E ratio of -91.90, whereas CDTG's P/E ratio is -0.77. In terms of profitability, GFLU's ROE is N/A, compared to CDTG's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, GFLU is more volatile compared to CDTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFLU.Check CDTG's competition here
GFLU vs VIVK Comparison July 2026
GFLU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFLU stands at 25B. In comparison, VIVK has a market cap of 806.7K. Regarding current trading prices, GFLU is priced at $70.30, while VIVK trades at $2.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFLU currently has a P/E ratio of -91.90, whereas VIVK's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, GFLU's ROE is N/A, compared to VIVK's ROE of -1.72%. Regarding short-term risk, GFLU is less volatile compared to VIVK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFLU.Check VIVK's competition here
GFLU vs CWY Comparison July 2026
GFLU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFLU stands at 25B. In comparison, CWY has a market cap of 585.9K. Regarding current trading prices, GFLU is priced at $70.30, while CWY trades at $17.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFLU currently has a P/E ratio of -91.90, whereas CWY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GFLU's ROE is N/A, compared to CWY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GFLU is more volatile compared to CWY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFLU.Check CWY's competition here
GFLU vs CVA Comparison July 2026
GFLU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFLU stands at 25B. In comparison, CVA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GFLU is priced at $70.30, while CVA trades at $20.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFLU currently has a P/E ratio of -91.90, whereas CVA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GFLU's ROE is N/A, compared to CVA's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GFLU is more volatile compared to CVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFLU.Check CVA's competition here
GFLU vs NES Comparison July 2026
GFLU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFLU stands at 25B. In comparison, NES has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GFLU is priced at $70.30, while NES trades at $2.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFLU currently has a P/E ratio of -91.90, whereas NES's P/E ratio is -1.32. In terms of profitability, GFLU's ROE is N/A, compared to NES's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, GFLU is less volatile compared to NES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFLU.Check NES's competition here
GFLU vs ECOL Comparison July 2026
GFLU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFLU stands at 25B. In comparison, ECOL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GFLU is priced at $70.30, while ECOL trades at $47.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFLU currently has a P/E ratio of -91.90, whereas ECOL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GFLU's ROE is N/A, compared to ECOL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GFLU is more volatile compared to ECOL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFLU.Check ECOL's competition here
GFLU vs SMED Comparison July 2026
GFLU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFLU stands at 25B. In comparison, SMED has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GFLU is priced at $70.30, while SMED trades at $8.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFLU currently has a P/E ratio of -91.90, whereas SMED's P/E ratio is 36.46. In terms of profitability, GFLU's ROE is N/A, compared to SMED's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, GFLU is more volatile compared to SMED. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFLU.Check SMED's competition here
GFLU vs ECOLW Comparison July 2026
GFLU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFLU stands at 25B. In comparison, ECOLW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GFLU is priced at $70.30, while ECOLW trades at $5.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFLU currently has a P/E ratio of -91.90, whereas ECOLW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GFLU's ROE is N/A, compared to ECOLW's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GFLU is more volatile compared to ECOLW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFLU.Check ECOLW's competition here