Quest Resource Holding Corporation
Quest Resource Holding Corporation (QRHC) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (QRHC) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Waste Management Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QRHC | $1.13 | -0.88% | 24.2M | -3.38 | -$0.34 | N/A |
| WM | $217.06 | -0.32% | 87.5B | 31.53 | $6.91 | +1.57% |
| RSG | $207.55 | -0.26% | 64.3B | 29.93 | $6.98 | +1.18% |
| WCN | $155.23 | -0.35% | 39.6B | 37.98 | $4.10 | +0.88% |
| GFLU | $70.30 | +4.32% | 25B | -91.90 | -$0.77 | N/A |
| CLH | $288.20 | +2.00% | 15.2B | 38.93 | $7.37 | N/A |
| GFL | $36.15 | +0.53% | 12.4B | 96.54 | $0.37 | +0.18% |
| SRCL | $61.98 | +0.83% | 5.8B | 158.92 | $0.39 | N/A |
| CWST | $87.63 | +0.47% | 5.5B | 794.64 | $0.11 | N/A |
| NVRI | $19.42 | -2.12% | 1.6B | -9.56 | -$2.05 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
QRHC vs WM Comparison May 2026
QRHC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRHC stands at 24.2M. In comparison, WM has a market cap of 87.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QRHC is priced at $1.13, while WM trades at $217.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRHC currently has a P/E ratio of -3.38, whereas WM's P/E ratio is 31.53. In terms of profitability, QRHC's ROE is -0.18%, compared to WM's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, QRHC is more volatile compared to WM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRHC.Check WM's competition here
QRHC vs RSG Comparison May 2026
QRHC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRHC stands at 24.2M. In comparison, RSG has a market cap of 64.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QRHC is priced at $1.13, while RSG trades at $207.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRHC currently has a P/E ratio of -3.38, whereas RSG's P/E ratio is 29.93. In terms of profitability, QRHC's ROE is -0.18%, compared to RSG's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, QRHC is more volatile compared to RSG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRHC.Check RSG's competition here
QRHC vs WCN Comparison May 2026
QRHC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRHC stands at 24.2M. In comparison, WCN has a market cap of 39.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QRHC is priced at $1.13, while WCN trades at $155.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRHC currently has a P/E ratio of -3.38, whereas WCN's P/E ratio is 37.98. In terms of profitability, QRHC's ROE is -0.18%, compared to WCN's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, QRHC is more volatile compared to WCN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRHC.Check WCN's competition here
QRHC vs GFLU Comparison May 2026
QRHC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRHC stands at 24.2M. In comparison, GFLU has a market cap of 25B. Regarding current trading prices, QRHC is priced at $1.13, while GFLU trades at $70.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRHC currently has a P/E ratio of -3.38, whereas GFLU's P/E ratio is -91.90. In terms of profitability, QRHC's ROE is -0.18%, compared to GFLU's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QRHC is less volatile compared to GFLU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRHC.Check GFLU's competition here
QRHC vs CLH Comparison May 2026
QRHC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRHC stands at 24.2M. In comparison, CLH has a market cap of 15.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QRHC is priced at $1.13, while CLH trades at $288.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRHC currently has a P/E ratio of -3.38, whereas CLH's P/E ratio is 38.93. In terms of profitability, QRHC's ROE is -0.18%, compared to CLH's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, QRHC is more volatile compared to CLH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRHC.Check CLH's competition here
QRHC vs GFL Comparison May 2026
QRHC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRHC stands at 24.2M. In comparison, GFL has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QRHC is priced at $1.13, while GFL trades at $36.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRHC currently has a P/E ratio of -3.38, whereas GFL's P/E ratio is 96.54. In terms of profitability, QRHC's ROE is -0.18%, compared to GFL's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, QRHC is less volatile compared to GFL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRHC.Check GFL's competition here
QRHC vs SRCL Comparison May 2026
QRHC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRHC stands at 24.2M. In comparison, SRCL has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QRHC is priced at $1.13, while SRCL trades at $61.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRHC currently has a P/E ratio of -3.38, whereas SRCL's P/E ratio is 158.92. In terms of profitability, QRHC's ROE is -0.18%, compared to SRCL's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, QRHC is more volatile compared to SRCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRHC.Check SRCL's competition here
QRHC vs CWST Comparison May 2026
QRHC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRHC stands at 24.2M. In comparison, CWST has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QRHC is priced at $1.13, while CWST trades at $87.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRHC currently has a P/E ratio of -3.38, whereas CWST's P/E ratio is 794.64. In terms of profitability, QRHC's ROE is -0.18%, compared to CWST's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QRHC is more volatile compared to CWST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRHC.Check CWST's competition here
QRHC vs NVRI Comparison May 2026
QRHC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRHC stands at 24.2M. In comparison, NVRI has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QRHC is priced at $1.13, while NVRI trades at $19.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRHC currently has a P/E ratio of -3.38, whereas NVRI's P/E ratio is -9.56. In terms of profitability, QRHC's ROE is -0.18%, compared to NVRI's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, QRHC is more volatile compared to NVRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRHC.Check NVRI's competition here
QRHC vs HCCI Comparison May 2026
QRHC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRHC stands at 24.2M. In comparison, HCCI has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QRHC is priced at $1.13, while HCCI trades at $45.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRHC currently has a P/E ratio of -3.38, whereas HCCI's P/E ratio is 14.22. In terms of profitability, QRHC's ROE is -0.18%, compared to HCCI's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, QRHC is more volatile compared to HCCI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRHC.Check HCCI's competition here
QRHC vs HSC Comparison May 2026
QRHC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRHC stands at 24.2M. In comparison, HSC has a market cap of 729.6M. Regarding current trading prices, QRHC is priced at $1.13, while HSC trades at $9.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRHC currently has a P/E ratio of -3.38, whereas HSC's P/E ratio is -5.08. In terms of profitability, QRHC's ROE is -0.18%, compared to HSC's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, QRHC is less volatile compared to HSC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRHC.Check HSC's competition here
QRHC vs MEG Comparison May 2026
QRHC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRHC stands at 24.2M. In comparison, MEG has a market cap of 565.7M. Regarding current trading prices, QRHC is priced at $1.13, while MEG trades at $15.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRHC currently has a P/E ratio of -3.38, whereas MEG's P/E ratio is -120.31. In terms of profitability, QRHC's ROE is -0.18%, compared to MEG's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, QRHC is less volatile compared to MEG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRHC.Check MEG's competition here
QRHC vs PESI Comparison May 2026
QRHC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRHC stands at 24.2M. In comparison, PESI has a market cap of 166.2M. Regarding current trading prices, QRHC is priced at $1.13, while PESI trades at $9.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRHC currently has a P/E ratio of -3.38, whereas PESI's P/E ratio is -11.33. In terms of profitability, QRHC's ROE is -0.18%, compared to PESI's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, QRHC is less volatile compared to PESI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRHC.Check PESI's competition here
QRHC vs YDDL Comparison May 2026
QRHC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRHC stands at 24.2M. In comparison, YDDL has a market cap of 151.1M. Regarding current trading prices, QRHC is priced at $1.13, while YDDL trades at $3.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRHC currently has a P/E ratio of -3.38, whereas YDDL's P/E ratio is 15.00. In terms of profitability, QRHC's ROE is -0.18%, compared to YDDL's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, QRHC is less volatile compared to YDDL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRHC.Check YDDL's competition here
QRHC vs ESGL Comparison May 2026
QRHC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRHC stands at 24.2M. In comparison, ESGL has a market cap of 80.1M. Regarding current trading prices, QRHC is priced at $1.13, while ESGL trades at $1.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRHC currently has a P/E ratio of -3.38, whereas ESGL's P/E ratio is -31.50. In terms of profitability, QRHC's ROE is -0.18%, compared to ESGL's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, QRHC is more volatile compared to ESGL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRHC.Check ESGL's competition here
QRHC vs LICY Comparison May 2026
QRHC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRHC stands at 24.2M. In comparison, LICY has a market cap of 29.9M. Regarding current trading prices, QRHC is priced at $1.13, while LICY trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRHC currently has a P/E ratio of -3.38, whereas LICY's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, QRHC's ROE is -0.18%, compared to LICY's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, QRHC is less volatile compared to LICY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRHC.Check LICY's competition here
QRHC vs AMBI Comparison May 2026
QRHC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRHC stands at 24.2M. In comparison, AMBI has a market cap of 24.4M. Regarding current trading prices, QRHC is priced at $1.13, while AMBI trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRHC currently has a P/E ratio of -3.38, whereas AMBI's P/E ratio is -44.00. In terms of profitability, QRHC's ROE is -0.18%, compared to AMBI's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, QRHC is less volatile compared to AMBI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRHC.Check AMBI's competition here
QRHC vs ENGS Comparison May 2026
QRHC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRHC stands at 24.2M. In comparison, ENGS has a market cap of 21.9M. Regarding current trading prices, QRHC is priced at $1.13, while ENGS trades at $1.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRHC currently has a P/E ratio of -3.38, whereas ENGS's P/E ratio is -6.65. In terms of profitability, QRHC's ROE is -0.18%, compared to ENGS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, QRHC is less volatile compared to ENGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRHC.Check ENGS's competition here
QRHC vs CHRA Comparison May 2026
QRHC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRHC stands at 24.2M. In comparison, CHRA has a market cap of 20.3M. Regarding current trading prices, QRHC is priced at $1.13, while CHRA trades at $5.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRHC currently has a P/E ratio of -3.38, whereas CHRA's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, QRHC's ROE is -0.18%, compared to CHRA's ROE of +20.59%. Regarding short-term risk, QRHC is more volatile compared to CHRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRHC.Check CHRA's competition here
QRHC vs LNZA Comparison May 2026
QRHC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRHC stands at 24.2M. In comparison, LNZA has a market cap of 17.4M. Regarding current trading prices, QRHC is priced at $1.13, while LNZA trades at $7.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRHC currently has a P/E ratio of -3.38, whereas LNZA's P/E ratio is -0.55. In terms of profitability, QRHC's ROE is -0.18%, compared to LNZA's ROE of -12.68%. Regarding short-term risk, QRHC is less volatile compared to LNZA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRHC.Check LNZA's competition here
QRHC vs AQMS Comparison May 2026
QRHC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRHC stands at 24.2M. In comparison, AQMS has a market cap of 13.3M. Regarding current trading prices, QRHC is priced at $1.13, while AQMS trades at $4.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRHC currently has a P/E ratio of -3.38, whereas AQMS's P/E ratio is -0.65. In terms of profitability, QRHC's ROE is -0.18%, compared to AQMS's ROE of -1.85%. Regarding short-term risk, QRHC is more volatile compared to AQMS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRHC.Check AQMS's competition here
QRHC vs AWX Comparison May 2026
QRHC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRHC stands at 24.2M. In comparison, AWX has a market cap of 10.1M. Regarding current trading prices, QRHC is priced at $1.13, while AWX trades at $2.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRHC currently has a P/E ratio of -3.38, whereas AWX's P/E ratio is 18.50. In terms of profitability, QRHC's ROE is -0.18%, compared to AWX's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, QRHC is more volatile compared to AWX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRHC.Check AWX's competition here
QRHC vs CHNR Comparison May 2026
QRHC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRHC stands at 24.2M. In comparison, CHNR has a market cap of 5.1M. Regarding current trading prices, QRHC is priced at $1.13, while CHNR trades at $4.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRHC currently has a P/E ratio of -3.38, whereas CHNR's P/E ratio is -29.00. In terms of profitability, QRHC's ROE is -0.18%, compared to CHNR's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QRHC is less volatile compared to CHNR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRHC.Check CHNR's competition here
QRHC vs CDTG Comparison May 2026
QRHC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRHC stands at 24.2M. In comparison, CDTG has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, QRHC is priced at $1.13, while CDTG trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRHC currently has a P/E ratio of -3.38, whereas CDTG's P/E ratio is -0.37. In terms of profitability, QRHC's ROE is -0.18%, compared to CDTG's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, QRHC is less volatile compared to CDTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRHC.Check CDTG's competition here
QRHC vs GWAV Comparison May 2026
QRHC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRHC stands at 24.2M. In comparison, GWAV has a market cap of 3M. Regarding current trading prices, QRHC is priced at $1.13, while GWAV trades at $3.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRHC currently has a P/E ratio of -3.38, whereas GWAV's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, QRHC's ROE is -0.18%, compared to GWAV's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, QRHC is less volatile compared to GWAV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRHC.Check GWAV's competition here
QRHC vs DXST Comparison May 2026
QRHC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRHC stands at 24.2M. In comparison, DXST has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, QRHC is priced at $1.13, while DXST trades at $1.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRHC currently has a P/E ratio of -3.38, whereas DXST's P/E ratio is -3.66. In terms of profitability, QRHC's ROE is -0.18%, compared to DXST's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, QRHC is less volatile compared to DXST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRHC.Check DXST's competition here
QRHC vs ECOLW Comparison May 2026
QRHC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRHC stands at 24.2M. In comparison, ECOLW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, QRHC is priced at $1.13, while ECOLW trades at $5.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRHC currently has a P/E ratio of -3.38, whereas ECOLW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QRHC's ROE is -0.18%, compared to ECOLW's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, QRHC is more volatile compared to ECOLW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRHC.Check ECOLW's competition here
QRHC vs ECOL Comparison May 2026
QRHC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRHC stands at 24.2M. In comparison, ECOL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, QRHC is priced at $1.13, while ECOL trades at $47.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRHC currently has a P/E ratio of -3.38, whereas ECOL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QRHC's ROE is -0.18%, compared to ECOL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, QRHC is more volatile compared to ECOL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRHC.Check ECOL's competition here
QRHC vs CVA Comparison May 2026
QRHC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRHC stands at 24.2M. In comparison, CVA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, QRHC is priced at $1.13, while CVA trades at $20.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRHC currently has a P/E ratio of -3.38, whereas CVA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QRHC's ROE is -0.18%, compared to CVA's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, QRHC is more volatile compared to CVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRHC.Check CVA's competition here
QRHC vs SMED Comparison May 2026
QRHC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRHC stands at 24.2M. In comparison, SMED has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, QRHC is priced at $1.13, while SMED trades at $8.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRHC currently has a P/E ratio of -3.38, whereas SMED's P/E ratio is 36.46. In terms of profitability, QRHC's ROE is -0.18%, compared to SMED's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, QRHC is more volatile compared to SMED. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRHC.Check SMED's competition here
QRHC vs NES Comparison May 2026
QRHC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRHC stands at 24.2M. In comparison, NES has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, QRHC is priced at $1.13, while NES trades at $2.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRHC currently has a P/E ratio of -3.38, whereas NES's P/E ratio is -1.32. In terms of profitability, QRHC's ROE is -0.18%, compared to NES's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, QRHC is less volatile compared to NES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRHC.Check NES's competition here