Covanta Holding Corporation (NYSE: CVA) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

Covanta Holding Corporation (NYSE: CVA) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CVA stands at 0. In comparison, WM has a market cap of 87.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CVA is priced at $20.26 on the NYSE, while WM trades at $218.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CVA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WM's P/E ratio is 28.66. In terms of profitability, CVA's ROE is -0.08%, compared to WM's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CVA is less volatile compared to WM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVA.Check WM's competition here

Covanta Holding Corporation (NYSE: CVA) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CVA stands at 0. In comparison, RSG has a market cap of 68.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CVA is priced at $20.26 on the NYSE, while RSG trades at $222.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CVA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RSG's P/E ratio is 31.24. In terms of profitability, CVA's ROE is -0.08%, compared to RSG's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CVA is less volatile compared to RSG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVA.Check RSG's competition here

Covanta Holding Corporation (NYSE: CVA) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CVA stands at 0. In comparison, WCN has a market cap of 41.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CVA is priced at $20.26 on the NYSE, while WCN trades at $164.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CVA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WCN's P/E ratio is 31.41. In terms of profitability, CVA's ROE is -0.08%, compared to WCN's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CVA is less volatile compared to WCN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVA.Check WCN's competition here

Covanta Holding Corporation (NYSE: CVA) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CVA stands at 0. In comparison, GFLU has a market cap of 25B. Regarding current trading prices, CVA is priced at $20.26 on the NYSE, while GFLU trades at $70.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CVA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GFLU's P/E ratio is -91.90. In terms of profitability, CVA's ROE is -0.08%, compared to GFLU's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CVA is less volatile compared to GFLU. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVA.Check GFLU's competition here

Covanta Holding Corporation (NYSE: CVA) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CVA stands at 0. In comparison, CLH has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CVA is priced at $20.26 on the NYSE, while CLH trades at $317.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CVA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CLH's P/E ratio is 38.47. In terms of profitability, CVA's ROE is -0.08%, compared to CLH's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CVA is less volatile compared to CLH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVA.Check CLH's competition here

Covanta Holding Corporation (NYSE: CVA) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CVA stands at 0. In comparison, GFL has a market cap of 15.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CVA is priced at $20.26 on the NYSE, while GFL trades at $43.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CVA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GFL's P/E ratio is 64.31. In terms of profitability, CVA's ROE is -0.08%, compared to GFL's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CVA is less volatile compared to GFL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVA.Check GFL's competition here

Covanta Holding Corporation (NYSE: CVA) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CVA stands at 0. In comparison, CWST has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CVA is priced at $20.26 on the NYSE, while CWST trades at $93.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CVA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CWST's P/E ratio is 73.07. In terms of profitability, CVA's ROE is -0.08%, compared to CWST's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CVA is less volatile compared to CWST. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVA.Check CWST's competition here

Covanta Holding Corporation (NYSE: CVA) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CVA stands at 0. In comparison, SRCL has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CVA is priced at $20.26 on the NYSE, while SRCL trades at $61.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CVA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SRCL's P/E ratio is 158.92. In terms of profitability, CVA's ROE is -0.08%, compared to SRCL's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CVA is more volatile compared to SRCL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVA.Check SRCL's competition here

Covanta Holding Corporation (NYSE: CVA) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CVA stands at 0. In comparison, NVRI has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CVA is priced at $20.26 on the NYSE, while NVRI trades at $22.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CVA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NVRI's P/E ratio is -99.83. In terms of profitability, CVA's ROE is -0.08%, compared to NVRI's ROE of +2.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CVA is less volatile compared to NVRI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVA.Check NVRI's competition here

Covanta Holding Corporation (NYSE: CVA) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CVA stands at 0. In comparison, HCCI has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CVA is priced at $20.26 on the NYSE, while HCCI trades at $45.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CVA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HCCI's P/E ratio is 14.22. In terms of profitability, CVA's ROE is -0.08%, compared to HCCI's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CVA is more volatile compared to HCCI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVA.Check HCCI's competition here

Covanta Holding Corporation (NYSE: CVA) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CVA stands at 0. In comparison, HSC has a market cap of 729.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CVA is priced at $20.26 on the NYSE, while HSC trades at $9.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CVA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HSC's P/E ratio is -5.08. In terms of profitability, CVA's ROE is -0.08%, compared to HSC's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, CVA is less volatile compared to HSC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVA.Check HSC's competition here

Covanta Holding Corporation (NYSE: CVA) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CVA stands at 0. In comparison, ONT has a market cap of 645.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CVA is priced at $20.26 on the NYSE, while ONT trades at $17.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CVA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ONT's P/E ratio is -59.52. In terms of profitability, CVA's ROE is -0.08%, compared to ONT's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CVA is less volatile compared to ONT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVA.Check ONT's competition here

Covanta Holding Corporation (NYSE: CVA) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CVA stands at 0. In comparison, MEG has a market cap of 565.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CVA is priced at $20.26 on the NYSE, while MEG trades at $15.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CVA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MEG's P/E ratio is -120.31. In terms of profitability, CVA's ROE is -0.08%, compared to MEG's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CVA is less volatile compared to MEG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVA.Check MEG's competition here

Covanta Holding Corporation (NYSE: CVA) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CVA stands at 0. In comparison, PESI has a market cap of 396.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CVA is priced at $20.26 on the NYSE, while PESI trades at $18.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CVA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PESI's P/E ratio is -23.67. In terms of profitability, CVA's ROE is -0.08%, compared to PESI's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, CVA is less volatile compared to PESI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVA.Check PESI's competition here

Covanta Holding Corporation (NYSE: CVA) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CVA stands at 0. In comparison, ABAT has a market cap of 379.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CVA is priced at $20.26 on the NYSE, while ABAT trades at $2.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CVA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ABAT's P/E ratio is -5.45. In terms of profitability, CVA's ROE is -0.08%, compared to ABAT's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, CVA is less volatile compared to ABAT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVA.Check ABAT's competition here

Covanta Holding Corporation (NYSE: CVA) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CVA stands at 0. In comparison, ESGL has a market cap of 80.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CVA is priced at $20.26 on the NYSE, while ESGL trades at $1.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CVA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ESGL's P/E ratio is -31.50. In terms of profitability, CVA's ROE is -0.08%, compared to ESGL's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CVA is less volatile compared to ESGL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVA.Check ESGL's competition here

Covanta Holding Corporation (NYSE: CVA) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CVA stands at 0. In comparison, YDDL has a market cap of 75.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CVA is priced at $20.26 on the NYSE, while YDDL trades at $1.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CVA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YDDL's P/E ratio is 7.50. In terms of profitability, CVA's ROE is -0.08%, compared to YDDL's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CVA is less volatile compared to YDDL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVA.Check YDDL's competition here

Covanta Holding Corporation (NYSE: CVA) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CVA stands at 0. In comparison, ENGS has a market cap of 37.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CVA is priced at $20.26 on the NYSE, while ENGS trades at $2.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CVA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ENGS's P/E ratio is -12.50. In terms of profitability, CVA's ROE is -0.08%, compared to ENGS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CVA is less volatile compared to ENGS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVA.Check ENGS's competition here

Covanta Holding Corporation (NYSE: CVA) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CVA stands at 0. In comparison, LICY has a market cap of 29.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CVA is priced at $20.26 on the NYSE, while LICY trades at $0.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CVA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LICY's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, CVA's ROE is -0.08%, compared to LICY's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, CVA is less volatile compared to LICY. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVA.Check LICY's competition here

Covanta Holding Corporation (NYSE: CVA) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CVA stands at 0. In comparison, QRHC has a market cap of 29.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CVA is priced at $20.26 on the NYSE, while QRHC trades at $1.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CVA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QRHC's P/E ratio is -5.75. In terms of profitability, CVA's ROE is -0.08%, compared to QRHC's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, CVA is less volatile compared to QRHC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVA.Check QRHC's competition here

Covanta Holding Corporation (NYSE: CVA) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CVA stands at 0. In comparison, AMBI has a market cap of 24.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CVA is priced at $20.26 on the NYSE, while AMBI trades at $0.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CVA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMBI's P/E ratio is -44.00. In terms of profitability, CVA's ROE is -0.08%, compared to AMBI's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CVA is less volatile compared to AMBI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVA.Check AMBI's competition here

Covanta Holding Corporation (NYSE: CVA) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CVA stands at 0. In comparison, OIO has a market cap of 24.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CVA is priced at $20.26 on the NYSE, while OIO trades at $1.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CVA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OIO's P/E ratio is -1.78. In terms of profitability, CVA's ROE is -0.08%, compared to OIO's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, CVA is less volatile compared to OIO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVA.Check OIO's competition here

Covanta Holding Corporation (NYSE: CVA) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CVA stands at 0. In comparison, CHRA has a market cap of 20.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CVA is priced at $20.26 on the NYSE, while CHRA trades at $5.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CVA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CHRA's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, CVA's ROE is -0.08%, compared to CHRA's ROE of +20.59%. Regarding short-term risk, CVA is more volatile compared to CHRA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVA.Check CHRA's competition here

Covanta Holding Corporation (NYSE: CVA) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CVA stands at 0. In comparison, LNZA has a market cap of 13.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CVA is priced at $20.26 on the NYSE, while LNZA trades at $6.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CVA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LNZA's P/E ratio is -0.39. In terms of profitability, CVA's ROE is -0.08%, compared to LNZA's ROE of +2.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CVA is less volatile compared to LNZA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVA.Check LNZA's competition here

Covanta Holding Corporation (NYSE: CVA) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CVA stands at 0. In comparison, AQMS has a market cap of 10.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CVA is priced at $20.26 on the NYSE, while AQMS trades at $3.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CVA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AQMS's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, CVA's ROE is -0.08%, compared to AQMS's ROE of -1.46%. Regarding short-term risk, CVA is less volatile compared to AQMS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVA.Check AQMS's competition here

Covanta Holding Corporation (NYSE: CVA) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CVA stands at 0. In comparison, AWX has a market cap of 10.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CVA is priced at $20.26 on the NYSE, while AWX trades at $2.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CVA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AWX's P/E ratio is 8.65. In terms of profitability, CVA's ROE is -0.08%, compared to AWX's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CVA is less volatile compared to AWX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVA.Check AWX's competition here

Covanta Holding Corporation (NYSE: CVA) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CVA stands at 0. In comparison, GWAV has a market cap of 4.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CVA is priced at $20.26 on the NYSE, while GWAV trades at $5.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CVA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GWAV's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, CVA's ROE is -0.08%, compared to GWAV's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, CVA is less volatile compared to GWAV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVA.Check GWAV's competition here

Covanta Holding Corporation (NYSE: CVA) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CVA stands at 0. In comparison, DXST has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CVA is priced at $20.26 on the NYSE, while DXST trades at $2.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CVA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DXST's P/E ratio is -4.25. In terms of profitability, CVA's ROE is -0.08%, compared to DXST's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CVA is less volatile compared to DXST. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVA.Check DXST's competition here

Covanta Holding Corporation (NYSE: CVA) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CVA stands at 0. In comparison, CDTG has a market cap of 703.3K. Regarding current trading prices, CVA is priced at $20.26 on the NYSE, while CDTG trades at $1.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CVA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CDTG's P/E ratio is -0.56. In terms of profitability, CVA's ROE is -0.08%, compared to CDTG's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CVA is less volatile compared to CDTG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVA.Check CDTG's competition here

Covanta Holding Corporation (NYSE: CVA) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CVA stands at 0. In comparison, ECOL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CVA is priced at $20.26 on the NYSE, while ECOL trades at $47.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CVA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ECOL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CVA's ROE is -0.08%, compared to ECOL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CVA is more volatile compared to ECOL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVA.Check ECOL's competition here

Covanta Holding Corporation (NYSE: CVA) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CVA stands at 0. In comparison, NES has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CVA is priced at $20.26 on the NYSE, while NES trades at $2.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CVA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NES's P/E ratio is -1.32. In terms of profitability, CVA's ROE is -0.08%, compared to NES's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CVA is less volatile compared to NES. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVA.Check NES's competition here

Covanta Holding Corporation (NYSE: CVA) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CVA stands at 0. In comparison, SMED has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CVA is priced at $20.26 on the NYSE, while SMED trades at $8.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CVA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SMED's P/E ratio is 36.46. In terms of profitability, CVA's ROE is -0.08%, compared to SMED's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, CVA is more volatile compared to SMED. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVA.Check SMED's competition here

Covanta Holding Corporation (NYSE: CVA) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CVA stands at 0. In comparison, ECOLW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CVA is priced at $20.26 on the NYSE, while ECOLW trades at $5.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CVA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ECOLW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CVA's ROE is -0.08%, compared to ECOLW's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CVA is more volatile compared to ECOLW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVA.Check ECOLW's competition here