Covanta Holding Corporation

CVA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CVA stands at 0. In comparison, WM has a market cap of 90.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CVA is priced at $20.26, while WM trades at $224.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CVA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WM's P/E ratio is 33.62. In terms of profitability, CVA's ROE is -0.08%, compared to WM's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CVA is less volatile compared to WM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVA.Check WM's competition here

CVA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CVA stands at 0. In comparison, RSG has a market cap of 65.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CVA is priced at $20.26, while RSG trades at $210.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CVA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RSG's P/E ratio is 30.79. In terms of profitability, CVA's ROE is -0.08%, compared to RSG's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CVA is less volatile compared to RSG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVA.Check RSG's competition here

CVA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CVA stands at 0. In comparison, WCN has a market cap of 40.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CVA is priced at $20.26, while WCN trades at $159.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CVA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WCN's P/E ratio is 38.34. In terms of profitability, CVA's ROE is -0.08%, compared to WCN's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CVA is less volatile compared to WCN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVA.Check WCN's competition here

CVA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CVA stands at 0. In comparison, GFLU has a market cap of 25B. Regarding current trading prices, CVA is priced at $20.26, while GFLU trades at $70.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CVA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GFLU's P/E ratio is -91.90. In terms of profitability, CVA's ROE is -0.08%, compared to GFLU's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CVA is less volatile compared to GFLU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVA.Check GFLU's competition here

CVA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CVA stands at 0. In comparison, CLH has a market cap of 15.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CVA is priced at $20.26, while CLH trades at $296.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CVA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CLH's P/E ratio is 40.60. In terms of profitability, CVA's ROE is -0.08%, compared to CLH's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CVA is less volatile compared to CLH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVA.Check CLH's competition here

CVA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CVA stands at 0. In comparison, GFL has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CVA is priced at $20.26, while GFL trades at $39.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CVA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GFL's P/E ratio is 105.49. In terms of profitability, CVA's ROE is -0.08%, compared to GFL's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, CVA is less volatile compared to GFL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVA.Check GFL's competition here

CVA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CVA stands at 0. In comparison, SRCL has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CVA is priced at $20.26, while SRCL trades at $61.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CVA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SRCL's P/E ratio is 158.92. In terms of profitability, CVA's ROE is -0.08%, compared to SRCL's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CVA is more volatile compared to SRCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVA.Check SRCL's competition here

CVA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CVA stands at 0. In comparison, CWST has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CVA is priced at $20.26, while CWST trades at $81.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CVA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CWST's P/E ratio is 679.50. In terms of profitability, CVA's ROE is -0.08%, compared to CWST's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CVA is less volatile compared to CWST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVA.Check CWST's competition here

CVA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CVA stands at 0. In comparison, NVRI has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CVA is priced at $20.26, while NVRI trades at $19.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CVA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NVRI's P/E ratio is -9.63. In terms of profitability, CVA's ROE is -0.08%, compared to NVRI's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, CVA is less volatile compared to NVRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVA.Check NVRI's competition here

CVA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CVA stands at 0. In comparison, HCCI has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CVA is priced at $20.26, while HCCI trades at $45.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CVA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HCCI's P/E ratio is 14.22. In terms of profitability, CVA's ROE is -0.08%, compared to HCCI's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CVA is more volatile compared to HCCI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVA.Check HCCI's competition here

CVA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CVA stands at 0. In comparison, MEG has a market cap of 761M. Regarding current trading prices, CVA is priced at $20.26, while MEG trades at $21.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CVA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MEG's P/E ratio is -151.07. In terms of profitability, CVA's ROE is -0.08%, compared to MEG's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CVA is less volatile compared to MEG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVA.Check MEG's competition here

CVA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CVA stands at 0. In comparison, HSC has a market cap of 729.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CVA is priced at $20.26, while HSC trades at $9.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CVA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HSC's P/E ratio is -5.08. In terms of profitability, CVA's ROE is -0.08%, compared to HSC's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, CVA is less volatile compared to HSC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVA.Check HSC's competition here

CVA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CVA stands at 0. In comparison, JAN has a market cap of 227.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CVA is priced at $20.26, while JAN trades at $26.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CVA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JAN's P/E ratio is -76.76. In terms of profitability, CVA's ROE is -0.08%, compared to JAN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CVA is less volatile compared to JAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVA.Check JAN's competition here

CVA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CVA stands at 0. In comparison, PESI has a market cap of 226.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CVA is priced at $20.26, while PESI trades at $12.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CVA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PESI's P/E ratio is -21.02. In terms of profitability, CVA's ROE is -0.08%, compared to PESI's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CVA is less volatile compared to PESI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVA.Check PESI's competition here

CVA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CVA stands at 0. In comparison, YDDL has a market cap of 188.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CVA is priced at $20.26, while YDDL trades at $4.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CVA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YDDL's P/E ratio is 28.53. In terms of profitability, CVA's ROE is -0.08%, compared to YDDL's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, CVA is less volatile compared to YDDL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVA.Check YDDL's competition here

CVA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CVA stands at 0. In comparison, ESGL has a market cap of 136.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CVA is priced at $20.26, while ESGL trades at $3.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CVA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ESGL's P/E ratio is -53.83. In terms of profitability, CVA's ROE is -0.08%, compared to ESGL's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CVA is less volatile compared to ESGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVA.Check ESGL's competition here

CVA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CVA stands at 0. In comparison, LNZA has a market cap of 91M. Regarding current trading prices, CVA is priced at $20.26, while LNZA trades at $41.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CVA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LNZA's P/E ratio is -1.86. In terms of profitability, CVA's ROE is -0.08%, compared to LNZA's ROE of +5.56%. Regarding short-term risk, CVA is less volatile compared to LNZA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVA.Check LNZA's competition here

CVA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CVA stands at 0. In comparison, LICY has a market cap of 29.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CVA is priced at $20.26, while LICY trades at $0.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CVA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LICY's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, CVA's ROE is -0.08%, compared to LICY's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, CVA is less volatile compared to LICY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVA.Check LICY's competition here

CVA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CVA stands at 0. In comparison, AMBI has a market cap of 24.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CVA is priced at $20.26, while AMBI trades at $0.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CVA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMBI's P/E ratio is -44.00. In terms of profitability, CVA's ROE is -0.08%, compared to AMBI's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CVA is less volatile compared to AMBI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVA.Check AMBI's competition here

CVA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CVA stands at 0. In comparison, QRHC has a market cap of 23.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CVA is priced at $20.26, while QRHC trades at $1.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CVA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QRHC's P/E ratio is -1.51. In terms of profitability, CVA's ROE is -0.08%, compared to QRHC's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, CVA is less volatile compared to QRHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVA.Check QRHC's competition here

CVA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CVA stands at 0. In comparison, CHRA has a market cap of 20.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CVA is priced at $20.26, while CHRA trades at $5.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CVA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CHRA's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, CVA's ROE is -0.08%, compared to CHRA's ROE of +20.59%. Regarding short-term risk, CVA is more volatile compared to CHRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVA.Check CHRA's competition here

CVA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CVA stands at 0. In comparison, ENGS has a market cap of 17M. Regarding current trading prices, CVA is priced at $20.26, while ENGS trades at $1.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CVA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ENGS's P/E ratio is -5.17. In terms of profitability, CVA's ROE is -0.08%, compared to ENGS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CVA is less volatile compared to ENGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVA.Check ENGS's competition here

CVA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CVA stands at 0. In comparison, AQMS has a market cap of 14.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CVA is priced at $20.26, while AQMS trades at $4.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CVA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AQMS's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, CVA's ROE is -0.08%, compared to AQMS's ROE of -2.52%. Regarding short-term risk, CVA is less volatile compared to AQMS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVA.Check AQMS's competition here

CVA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CVA stands at 0. In comparison, AWX has a market cap of 9.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CVA is priced at $20.26, while AWX trades at $2.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CVA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AWX's P/E ratio is 31.75. In terms of profitability, CVA's ROE is -0.08%, compared to AWX's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CVA is less volatile compared to AWX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVA.Check AWX's competition here

CVA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CVA stands at 0. In comparison, CHNR has a market cap of 4.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CVA is priced at $20.26, while CHNR trades at $3.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CVA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CHNR's P/E ratio is -7.44. In terms of profitability, CVA's ROE is -0.08%, compared to CHNR's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CVA is less volatile compared to CHNR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVA.Check CHNR's competition here

CVA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CVA stands at 0. In comparison, CDTG has a market cap of 4.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CVA is priced at $20.26, while CDTG trades at $0.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CVA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CDTG's P/E ratio is -3.12. In terms of profitability, CVA's ROE is -0.08%, compared to CDTG's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CVA is less volatile compared to CDTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVA.Check CDTG's competition here

CVA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CVA stands at 0. In comparison, GWAV has a market cap of 3.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CVA is priced at $20.26, while GWAV trades at $3.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CVA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GWAV's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, CVA's ROE is -0.08%, compared to GWAV's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, CVA is less volatile compared to GWAV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVA.Check GWAV's competition here

CVA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CVA stands at 0. In comparison, DXST has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CVA is priced at $20.26, while DXST trades at $2.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CVA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DXST's P/E ratio is -5.57. In terms of profitability, CVA's ROE is -0.08%, compared to DXST's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CVA is less volatile compared to DXST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVA.Check DXST's competition here

CVA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CVA stands at 0. In comparison, NES has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CVA is priced at $20.26, while NES trades at $2.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CVA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NES's P/E ratio is -1.32. In terms of profitability, CVA's ROE is -0.08%, compared to NES's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CVA is less volatile compared to NES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVA.Check NES's competition here

CVA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CVA stands at 0. In comparison, ECOL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CVA is priced at $20.26, while ECOL trades at $47.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CVA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ECOL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CVA's ROE is -0.08%, compared to ECOL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CVA is more volatile compared to ECOL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVA.Check ECOL's competition here

CVA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CVA stands at 0. In comparison, SMED has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CVA is priced at $20.26, while SMED trades at $8.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CVA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SMED's P/E ratio is 36.46. In terms of profitability, CVA's ROE is -0.08%, compared to SMED's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, CVA is more volatile compared to SMED. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVA.Check SMED's competition here

CVA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CVA stands at 0. In comparison, ECOLW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CVA is priced at $20.26, while ECOLW trades at $5.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CVA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ECOLW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CVA's ROE is -0.08%, compared to ECOLW's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CVA is more volatile compared to ECOLW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVA.Check ECOLW's competition here