Clean Harbors, Inc.
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for CLH
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for CLH
Clean Harbors, Inc. (CLH) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CLH) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Waste Management Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CLH | $297.11 | -2.14% | 16.3B | 41.77 | $7.29 | N/A |
| WM | $225.32 | -2.46% | 91.6B | 33.94 | $6.69 | +1.51% |
| RSG | $210.45 | -1.42% | 65.4B | 30.91 | $6.85 | +1.17% |
| WCN | $160.09 | -1.00% | 40.8B | 38.27 | $4.17 | +0.84% |
| GFLU | $70.30 | +4.32% | 25B | -91.90 | -$0.77 | N/A |
| GFL | $38.65 | -0.77% | 13.4B | 104.50 | $0.37 | +0.16% |
| SRCL | $61.98 | +0.83% | 5.8B | 158.92 | $0.39 | N/A |
| CWST | $81.98 | -3.42% | 5.2B | 695.33 | $0.12 | N/A |
| NVRI | $19.58 | +1.64% | 1.6B | -9.68 | -$2.03 | N/A |
| HCCI | $45.51 | +0.09% | 1.1B | 14.22 | $3.20 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
CLH vs WM Comparison April 2026
CLH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLH stands at 16.3B. In comparison, WM has a market cap of 91.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CLH is priced at $297.11, while WM trades at $225.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLH currently has a P/E ratio of 41.77, whereas WM's P/E ratio is 33.94. In terms of profitability, CLH's ROE is +0.14%, compared to WM's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CLH is more volatile compared to WM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLH.Check WM's competition here
CLH vs RSG Comparison April 2026
CLH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLH stands at 16.3B. In comparison, RSG has a market cap of 65.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CLH is priced at $297.11, while RSG trades at $210.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLH currently has a P/E ratio of 41.77, whereas RSG's P/E ratio is 30.91. In terms of profitability, CLH's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RSG's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CLH is more volatile compared to RSG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLH.Check RSG's competition here
CLH vs WCN Comparison April 2026
CLH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLH stands at 16.3B. In comparison, WCN has a market cap of 40.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CLH is priced at $297.11, while WCN trades at $160.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLH currently has a P/E ratio of 41.77, whereas WCN's P/E ratio is 38.27. In terms of profitability, CLH's ROE is +0.14%, compared to WCN's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CLH is more volatile compared to WCN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLH.Check WCN's competition here
CLH vs GFLU Comparison April 2026
CLH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLH stands at 16.3B. In comparison, GFLU has a market cap of 25B. Regarding current trading prices, CLH is priced at $297.11, while GFLU trades at $70.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLH currently has a P/E ratio of 41.77, whereas GFLU's P/E ratio is -91.90. In terms of profitability, CLH's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GFLU's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CLH is less volatile compared to GFLU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLH.Check GFLU's competition here
CLH vs GFL Comparison April 2026
CLH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLH stands at 16.3B. In comparison, GFL has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CLH is priced at $297.11, while GFL trades at $38.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLH currently has a P/E ratio of 41.77, whereas GFL's P/E ratio is 104.50. In terms of profitability, CLH's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GFL's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, CLH is less volatile compared to GFL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLH.Check GFL's competition here
CLH vs SRCL Comparison April 2026
CLH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLH stands at 16.3B. In comparison, SRCL has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CLH is priced at $297.11, while SRCL trades at $61.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLH currently has a P/E ratio of 41.77, whereas SRCL's P/E ratio is 158.92. In terms of profitability, CLH's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SRCL's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CLH is more volatile compared to SRCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLH.Check SRCL's competition here
CLH vs CWST Comparison April 2026
CLH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLH stands at 16.3B. In comparison, CWST has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CLH is priced at $297.11, while CWST trades at $81.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLH currently has a P/E ratio of 41.77, whereas CWST's P/E ratio is 695.33. In terms of profitability, CLH's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CWST's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CLH is more volatile compared to CWST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLH.Check CWST's competition here
CLH vs NVRI Comparison April 2026
CLH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLH stands at 16.3B. In comparison, NVRI has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CLH is priced at $297.11, while NVRI trades at $19.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLH currently has a P/E ratio of 41.77, whereas NVRI's P/E ratio is -9.68. In terms of profitability, CLH's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NVRI's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, CLH is more volatile compared to NVRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLH.Check NVRI's competition here
CLH vs HCCI Comparison April 2026
CLH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLH stands at 16.3B. In comparison, HCCI has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CLH is priced at $297.11, while HCCI trades at $45.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLH currently has a P/E ratio of 41.77, whereas HCCI's P/E ratio is 14.22. In terms of profitability, CLH's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HCCI's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CLH is more volatile compared to HCCI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLH.Check HCCI's competition here
CLH vs MEG Comparison April 2026
CLH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLH stands at 16.3B. In comparison, MEG has a market cap of 779.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CLH is priced at $297.11, while MEG trades at $21.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLH currently has a P/E ratio of 41.77, whereas MEG's P/E ratio is -154.79. In terms of profitability, CLH's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MEG's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CLH is less volatile compared to MEG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLH.Check MEG's competition here
CLH vs HSC Comparison April 2026
CLH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLH stands at 16.3B. In comparison, HSC has a market cap of 729.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CLH is priced at $297.11, while HSC trades at $9.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLH currently has a P/E ratio of 41.77, whereas HSC's P/E ratio is -5.08. In terms of profitability, CLH's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HSC's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, CLH is less volatile compared to HSC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLH.Check HSC's competition here
CLH vs PESI Comparison April 2026
CLH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLH stands at 16.3B. In comparison, PESI has a market cap of 225M. Regarding current trading prices, CLH is priced at $297.11, while PESI trades at $12.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLH currently has a P/E ratio of 41.77, whereas PESI's P/E ratio is -20.91. In terms of profitability, CLH's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PESI's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CLH is more volatile compared to PESI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLH.Check PESI's competition here
CLH vs JAN Comparison April 2026
CLH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLH stands at 16.3B. In comparison, JAN has a market cap of 224.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CLH is priced at $297.11, while JAN trades at $25.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLH currently has a P/E ratio of 41.77, whereas JAN's P/E ratio is -75.82. In terms of profitability, CLH's ROE is +0.14%, compared to JAN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CLH is less volatile compared to JAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLH.Check JAN's competition here
CLH vs YDDL Comparison April 2026
CLH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLH stands at 16.3B. In comparison, YDDL has a market cap of 198.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CLH is priced at $297.11, while YDDL trades at $4.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLH currently has a P/E ratio of 41.77, whereas YDDL's P/E ratio is 30.07. In terms of profitability, CLH's ROE is +0.14%, compared to YDDL's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, CLH is less volatile compared to YDDL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLH.Check YDDL's competition here
CLH vs ESGL Comparison April 2026
CLH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLH stands at 16.3B. In comparison, ESGL has a market cap of 136.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CLH is priced at $297.11, while ESGL trades at $3.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLH currently has a P/E ratio of 41.77, whereas ESGL's P/E ratio is -53.83. In terms of profitability, CLH's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ESGL's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CLH is less volatile compared to ESGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLH.Check ESGL's competition here
CLH vs LNZA Comparison April 2026
CLH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLH stands at 16.3B. In comparison, LNZA has a market cap of 83.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CLH is priced at $297.11, while LNZA trades at $41.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLH currently has a P/E ratio of 41.77, whereas LNZA's P/E ratio is -1.70. In terms of profitability, CLH's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LNZA's ROE of +5.56%. Regarding short-term risk, CLH is less volatile compared to LNZA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLH.Check LNZA's competition here
CLH vs LICY Comparison April 2026
CLH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLH stands at 16.3B. In comparison, LICY has a market cap of 29.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CLH is priced at $297.11, while LICY trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLH currently has a P/E ratio of 41.77, whereas LICY's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, CLH's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LICY's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, CLH is less volatile compared to LICY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLH.Check LICY's competition here
CLH vs AMBI Comparison April 2026
CLH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLH stands at 16.3B. In comparison, AMBI has a market cap of 24.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CLH is priced at $297.11, while AMBI trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLH currently has a P/E ratio of 41.77, whereas AMBI's P/E ratio is -44.00. In terms of profitability, CLH's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AMBI's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CLH is less volatile compared to AMBI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLH.Check AMBI's competition here
CLH vs QRHC Comparison April 2026
CLH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLH stands at 16.3B. In comparison, QRHC has a market cap of 23.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CLH is priced at $297.11, while QRHC trades at $1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLH currently has a P/E ratio of 41.77, whereas QRHC's P/E ratio is -1.53. In terms of profitability, CLH's ROE is +0.14%, compared to QRHC's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, CLH is less volatile compared to QRHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLH.Check QRHC's competition here
CLH vs CHRA Comparison April 2026
CLH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLH stands at 16.3B. In comparison, CHRA has a market cap of 20.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CLH is priced at $297.11, while CHRA trades at $5.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLH currently has a P/E ratio of 41.77, whereas CHRA's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, CLH's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CHRA's ROE of +20.59%. Regarding short-term risk, CLH is more volatile compared to CHRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLH.Check CHRA's competition here
CLH vs ENGS Comparison April 2026
CLH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLH stands at 16.3B. In comparison, ENGS has a market cap of 16.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CLH is priced at $297.11, while ENGS trades at $1.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLH currently has a P/E ratio of 41.77, whereas ENGS's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, CLH's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ENGS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CLH is less volatile compared to ENGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLH.Check ENGS's competition here
CLH vs AQMS Comparison April 2026
CLH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLH stands at 16.3B. In comparison, AQMS has a market cap of 13.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CLH is priced at $297.11, while AQMS trades at $4.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLH currently has a P/E ratio of 41.77, whereas AQMS's P/E ratio is -0.27. In terms of profitability, CLH's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AQMS's ROE of -2.52%. Regarding short-term risk, CLH is less volatile compared to AQMS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLH.Check AQMS's competition here
CLH vs AWX Comparison April 2026
CLH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLH stands at 16.3B. In comparison, AWX has a market cap of 9.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CLH is priced at $297.11, while AWX trades at $2.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLH currently has a P/E ratio of 41.77, whereas AWX's P/E ratio is 31.75. In terms of profitability, CLH's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AWX's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CLH is more volatile compared to AWX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLH.Check AWX's competition here
CLH vs CHNR Comparison April 2026
CLH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLH stands at 16.3B. In comparison, CHNR has a market cap of 4.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CLH is priced at $297.11, while CHNR trades at $3.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLH currently has a P/E ratio of 41.77, whereas CHNR's P/E ratio is -7.58. In terms of profitability, CLH's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CHNR's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CLH is less volatile compared to CHNR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLH.Check CHNR's competition here
CLH vs CDTG Comparison April 2026
CLH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLH stands at 16.3B. In comparison, CDTG has a market cap of 4.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CLH is priced at $297.11, while CDTG trades at $0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLH currently has a P/E ratio of 41.77, whereas CDTG's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, CLH's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CDTG's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CLH is less volatile compared to CDTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLH.Check CDTG's competition here
CLH vs GWAV Comparison April 2026
CLH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLH stands at 16.3B. In comparison, GWAV has a market cap of 3M. Regarding current trading prices, CLH is priced at $297.11, while GWAV trades at $3.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLH currently has a P/E ratio of 41.77, whereas GWAV's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, CLH's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GWAV's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, CLH is less volatile compared to GWAV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLH.Check GWAV's competition here
CLH vs DXST Comparison April 2026
CLH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLH stands at 16.3B. In comparison, DXST has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CLH is priced at $297.11, while DXST trades at $2.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLH currently has a P/E ratio of 41.77, whereas DXST's P/E ratio is -5.86. In terms of profitability, CLH's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DXST's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CLH is less volatile compared to DXST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLH.Check DXST's competition here
CLH vs NES Comparison April 2026
CLH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLH stands at 16.3B. In comparison, NES has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CLH is priced at $297.11, while NES trades at $2.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLH currently has a P/E ratio of 41.77, whereas NES's P/E ratio is -1.32. In terms of profitability, CLH's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NES's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CLH is less volatile compared to NES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLH.Check NES's competition here
CLH vs ECOL Comparison April 2026
CLH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLH stands at 16.3B. In comparison, ECOL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CLH is priced at $297.11, while ECOL trades at $47.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLH currently has a P/E ratio of 41.77, whereas ECOL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLH's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ECOL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CLH is more volatile compared to ECOL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLH.Check ECOL's competition here
CLH vs SMED Comparison April 2026
CLH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLH stands at 16.3B. In comparison, SMED has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CLH is priced at $297.11, while SMED trades at $8.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLH currently has a P/E ratio of 41.77, whereas SMED's P/E ratio is 36.46. In terms of profitability, CLH's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SMED's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, CLH is more volatile compared to SMED. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLH.Check SMED's competition here
CLH vs ECOLW Comparison April 2026
CLH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLH stands at 16.3B. In comparison, ECOLW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CLH is priced at $297.11, while ECOLW trades at $5.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLH currently has a P/E ratio of 41.77, whereas ECOLW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLH's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ECOLW's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CLH is more volatile compared to ECOLW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLH.Check ECOLW's competition here
CLH vs CVA Comparison April 2026
CLH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLH stands at 16.3B. In comparison, CVA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CLH is priced at $297.11, while CVA trades at $20.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLH currently has a P/E ratio of 41.77, whereas CVA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLH's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CVA's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CLH is more volatile compared to CVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLH.Check CVA's competition here