GFL Environmental Inc.
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for GFL
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for GFL
GFL Environmental Inc. (GFL) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (GFL) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Waste Management Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GFL | $39.01 | +0.14% | 13.4B | 104.50 | $0.37 | +0.16% |
| WM | $225.46 | -2.40% | 91.6B | 33.94 | $6.69 | +1.51% |
| RSG | $210.96 | -1.18% | 65.4B | 30.91 | $6.85 | +1.17% |
| WCN | $160.29 | -0.88% | 40.8B | 38.27 | $4.17 | +0.84% |
| GFLU | $70.30 | +4.32% | 25B | -91.90 | -$0.77 | N/A |
| CLH | $298.18 | -1.79% | 16.3B | 41.77 | $7.29 | N/A |
| SRCL | $61.98 | +0.83% | 5.8B | 158.92 | $0.39 | N/A |
| CWST | $82.06 | -3.33% | 5.2B | 695.33 | $0.12 | N/A |
| NVRI | $19.55 | +1.51% | 1.6B | -9.68 | -$2.03 | N/A |
| HCCI | $45.51 | +0.09% | 1.1B | 14.22 | $3.20 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
GFL vs WM Comparison April 2026
GFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFL stands at 13.4B. In comparison, WM has a market cap of 91.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GFL is priced at $39.01, while WM trades at $225.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFL currently has a P/E ratio of 104.50, whereas WM's P/E ratio is 33.94. In terms of profitability, GFL's ROE is +0.50%, compared to WM's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, GFL is more volatile compared to WM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFL.Check WM's competition here
GFL vs RSG Comparison April 2026
GFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFL stands at 13.4B. In comparison, RSG has a market cap of 65.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GFL is priced at $39.01, while RSG trades at $210.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFL currently has a P/E ratio of 104.50, whereas RSG's P/E ratio is 30.91. In terms of profitability, GFL's ROE is +0.50%, compared to RSG's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GFL is more volatile compared to RSG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFL.Check RSG's competition here
GFL vs WCN Comparison April 2026
GFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFL stands at 13.4B. In comparison, WCN has a market cap of 40.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GFL is priced at $39.01, while WCN trades at $160.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFL currently has a P/E ratio of 104.50, whereas WCN's P/E ratio is 38.27. In terms of profitability, GFL's ROE is +0.50%, compared to WCN's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GFL is more volatile compared to WCN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFL.Check WCN's competition here
GFL vs GFLU Comparison April 2026
GFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFL stands at 13.4B. In comparison, GFLU has a market cap of 25B. Regarding current trading prices, GFL is priced at $39.01, while GFLU trades at $70.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFL currently has a P/E ratio of 104.50, whereas GFLU's P/E ratio is -91.90. In terms of profitability, GFL's ROE is +0.50%, compared to GFLU's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GFL is less volatile compared to GFLU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFL.Check GFLU's competition here
GFL vs CLH Comparison April 2026
GFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFL stands at 13.4B. In comparison, CLH has a market cap of 16.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GFL is priced at $39.01, while CLH trades at $298.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFL currently has a P/E ratio of 104.50, whereas CLH's P/E ratio is 41.77. In terms of profitability, GFL's ROE is +0.50%, compared to CLH's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GFL is more volatile compared to CLH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFL.Check CLH's competition here
GFL vs SRCL Comparison April 2026
GFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFL stands at 13.4B. In comparison, SRCL has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GFL is priced at $39.01, while SRCL trades at $61.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFL currently has a P/E ratio of 104.50, whereas SRCL's P/E ratio is 158.92. In terms of profitability, GFL's ROE is +0.50%, compared to SRCL's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GFL is more volatile compared to SRCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFL.Check SRCL's competition here
GFL vs CWST Comparison April 2026
GFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFL stands at 13.4B. In comparison, CWST has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GFL is priced at $39.01, while CWST trades at $82.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFL currently has a P/E ratio of 104.50, whereas CWST's P/E ratio is 695.33. In terms of profitability, GFL's ROE is +0.50%, compared to CWST's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GFL is more volatile compared to CWST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFL.Check CWST's competition here
GFL vs NVRI Comparison April 2026
GFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFL stands at 13.4B. In comparison, NVRI has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GFL is priced at $39.01, while NVRI trades at $19.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFL currently has a P/E ratio of 104.50, whereas NVRI's P/E ratio is -9.68. In terms of profitability, GFL's ROE is +0.50%, compared to NVRI's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, GFL is more volatile compared to NVRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFL.Check NVRI's competition here
GFL vs HCCI Comparison April 2026
GFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFL stands at 13.4B. In comparison, HCCI has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GFL is priced at $39.01, while HCCI trades at $45.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFL currently has a P/E ratio of 104.50, whereas HCCI's P/E ratio is 14.22. In terms of profitability, GFL's ROE is +0.50%, compared to HCCI's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, GFL is more volatile compared to HCCI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFL.Check HCCI's competition here
GFL vs MEG Comparison April 2026
GFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFL stands at 13.4B. In comparison, MEG has a market cap of 779.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GFL is priced at $39.01, while MEG trades at $21.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFL currently has a P/E ratio of 104.50, whereas MEG's P/E ratio is -154.79. In terms of profitability, GFL's ROE is +0.50%, compared to MEG's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GFL is more volatile compared to MEG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFL.Check MEG's competition here
GFL vs HSC Comparison April 2026
GFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFL stands at 13.4B. In comparison, HSC has a market cap of 729.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GFL is priced at $39.01, while HSC trades at $9.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFL currently has a P/E ratio of 104.50, whereas HSC's P/E ratio is -5.08. In terms of profitability, GFL's ROE is +0.50%, compared to HSC's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, GFL is less volatile compared to HSC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFL.Check HSC's competition here
GFL vs PESI Comparison April 2026
GFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFL stands at 13.4B. In comparison, PESI has a market cap of 225M. Regarding current trading prices, GFL is priced at $39.01, while PESI trades at $12.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFL currently has a P/E ratio of 104.50, whereas PESI's P/E ratio is -20.91. In terms of profitability, GFL's ROE is +0.50%, compared to PESI's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, GFL is more volatile compared to PESI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFL.Check PESI's competition here
GFL vs JAN Comparison April 2026
GFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFL stands at 13.4B. In comparison, JAN has a market cap of 224.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GFL is priced at $39.01, while JAN trades at $25.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFL currently has a P/E ratio of 104.50, whereas JAN's P/E ratio is -75.82. In terms of profitability, GFL's ROE is +0.50%, compared to JAN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GFL is more volatile compared to JAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFL.Check JAN's competition here
GFL vs YDDL Comparison April 2026
GFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFL stands at 13.4B. In comparison, YDDL has a market cap of 198.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GFL is priced at $39.01, while YDDL trades at $4.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFL currently has a P/E ratio of 104.50, whereas YDDL's P/E ratio is 30.07. In terms of profitability, GFL's ROE is +0.50%, compared to YDDL's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, GFL is less volatile compared to YDDL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFL.Check YDDL's competition here
GFL vs ESGL Comparison April 2026
GFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFL stands at 13.4B. In comparison, ESGL has a market cap of 136.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GFL is priced at $39.01, while ESGL trades at $3.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFL currently has a P/E ratio of 104.50, whereas ESGL's P/E ratio is -53.83. In terms of profitability, GFL's ROE is +0.50%, compared to ESGL's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GFL is more volatile compared to ESGL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFL.Check ESGL's competition here
GFL vs LNZA Comparison April 2026
GFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFL stands at 13.4B. In comparison, LNZA has a market cap of 83.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GFL is priced at $39.01, while LNZA trades at $41.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFL currently has a P/E ratio of 104.50, whereas LNZA's P/E ratio is -1.70. In terms of profitability, GFL's ROE is +0.50%, compared to LNZA's ROE of +5.56%. Regarding short-term risk, GFL is less volatile compared to LNZA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFL.Check LNZA's competition here
GFL vs LICY Comparison April 2026
GFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFL stands at 13.4B. In comparison, LICY has a market cap of 29.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GFL is priced at $39.01, while LICY trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFL currently has a P/E ratio of 104.50, whereas LICY's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, GFL's ROE is +0.50%, compared to LICY's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, GFL is less volatile compared to LICY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFL.Check LICY's competition here
GFL vs AMBI Comparison April 2026
GFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFL stands at 13.4B. In comparison, AMBI has a market cap of 24.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GFL is priced at $39.01, while AMBI trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFL currently has a P/E ratio of 104.50, whereas AMBI's P/E ratio is -44.00. In terms of profitability, GFL's ROE is +0.50%, compared to AMBI's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GFL is less volatile compared to AMBI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFL.Check AMBI's competition here
GFL vs QRHC Comparison April 2026
GFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFL stands at 13.4B. In comparison, QRHC has a market cap of 23.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GFL is priced at $39.01, while QRHC trades at $1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFL currently has a P/E ratio of 104.50, whereas QRHC's P/E ratio is -1.53. In terms of profitability, GFL's ROE is +0.50%, compared to QRHC's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, GFL is less volatile compared to QRHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFL.Check QRHC's competition here
GFL vs CHRA Comparison April 2026
GFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFL stands at 13.4B. In comparison, CHRA has a market cap of 20.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GFL is priced at $39.01, while CHRA trades at $5.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFL currently has a P/E ratio of 104.50, whereas CHRA's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, GFL's ROE is +0.50%, compared to CHRA's ROE of +20.59%. Regarding short-term risk, GFL is more volatile compared to CHRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFL.Check CHRA's competition here
GFL vs ENGS Comparison April 2026
GFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFL stands at 13.4B. In comparison, ENGS has a market cap of 16.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GFL is priced at $39.01, while ENGS trades at $1.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFL currently has a P/E ratio of 104.50, whereas ENGS's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, GFL's ROE is +0.50%, compared to ENGS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, GFL and ENGS have similar daily volatility (4.60).Check ENGS's competition here
GFL vs AQMS Comparison April 2026
GFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFL stands at 13.4B. In comparison, AQMS has a market cap of 13.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GFL is priced at $39.01, while AQMS trades at $4.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFL currently has a P/E ratio of 104.50, whereas AQMS's P/E ratio is -0.27. In terms of profitability, GFL's ROE is +0.50%, compared to AQMS's ROE of -2.52%. Regarding short-term risk, GFL is more volatile compared to AQMS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFL.Check AQMS's competition here
GFL vs AWX Comparison April 2026
GFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFL stands at 13.4B. In comparison, AWX has a market cap of 9.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GFL is priced at $39.01, while AWX trades at $2.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFL currently has a P/E ratio of 104.50, whereas AWX's P/E ratio is 31.75. In terms of profitability, GFL's ROE is +0.50%, compared to AWX's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GFL is more volatile compared to AWX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFL.Check AWX's competition here
GFL vs CHNR Comparison April 2026
GFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFL stands at 13.4B. In comparison, CHNR has a market cap of 4.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GFL is priced at $39.01, while CHNR trades at $3.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFL currently has a P/E ratio of 104.50, whereas CHNR's P/E ratio is -7.58. In terms of profitability, GFL's ROE is +0.50%, compared to CHNR's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GFL is less volatile compared to CHNR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFL.Check CHNR's competition here
GFL vs CDTG Comparison April 2026
GFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFL stands at 13.4B. In comparison, CDTG has a market cap of 4.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GFL is priced at $39.01, while CDTG trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFL currently has a P/E ratio of 104.50, whereas CDTG's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, GFL's ROE is +0.50%, compared to CDTG's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GFL is less volatile compared to CDTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFL.Check CDTG's competition here
GFL vs GWAV Comparison April 2026
GFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFL stands at 13.4B. In comparison, GWAV has a market cap of 3M. Regarding current trading prices, GFL is priced at $39.01, while GWAV trades at $3.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFL currently has a P/E ratio of 104.50, whereas GWAV's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, GFL's ROE is +0.50%, compared to GWAV's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, GFL is less volatile compared to GWAV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFL.Check GWAV's competition here
GFL vs DXST Comparison April 2026
GFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFL stands at 13.4B. In comparison, DXST has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GFL is priced at $39.01, while DXST trades at $2.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFL currently has a P/E ratio of 104.50, whereas DXST's P/E ratio is -5.86. In terms of profitability, GFL's ROE is +0.50%, compared to DXST's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GFL is less volatile compared to DXST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFL.Check DXST's competition here
GFL vs NES Comparison April 2026
GFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFL stands at 13.4B. In comparison, NES has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GFL is priced at $39.01, while NES trades at $2.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFL currently has a P/E ratio of 104.50, whereas NES's P/E ratio is -1.32. In terms of profitability, GFL's ROE is +0.50%, compared to NES's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, GFL is less volatile compared to NES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFL.Check NES's competition here
GFL vs ECOL Comparison April 2026
GFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFL stands at 13.4B. In comparison, ECOL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GFL is priced at $39.01, while ECOL trades at $47.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFL currently has a P/E ratio of 104.50, whereas ECOL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GFL's ROE is +0.50%, compared to ECOL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GFL is more volatile compared to ECOL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFL.Check ECOL's competition here
GFL vs SMED Comparison April 2026
GFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFL stands at 13.4B. In comparison, SMED has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GFL is priced at $39.01, while SMED trades at $8.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFL currently has a P/E ratio of 104.50, whereas SMED's P/E ratio is 36.46. In terms of profitability, GFL's ROE is +0.50%, compared to SMED's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, GFL is more volatile compared to SMED. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFL.Check SMED's competition here
GFL vs ECOLW Comparison April 2026
GFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFL stands at 13.4B. In comparison, ECOLW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GFL is priced at $39.01, while ECOLW trades at $5.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFL currently has a P/E ratio of 104.50, whereas ECOLW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GFL's ROE is +0.50%, compared to ECOLW's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GFL is more volatile compared to ECOLW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFL.Check ECOLW's competition here
GFL vs CVA Comparison April 2026
GFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFL stands at 13.4B. In comparison, CVA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GFL is priced at $39.01, while CVA trades at $20.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFL currently has a P/E ratio of 104.50, whereas CVA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GFL's ROE is +0.50%, compared to CVA's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GFL is more volatile compared to CVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFL.Check CVA's competition here