Waste Management, Inc.

WM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 94.48B. In comparison, RSG has a market cap of 78.34B. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $234.80, while RSG trades at $250.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WM currently has a P/E ratio of 35.36, whereas RSG's P/E ratio is 38.69. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.33%, compared to RSG's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, WM is more volatile compared to RSG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.

WM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 94.48B. In comparison, WCN has a market cap of 51.14B. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $234.80, while WCN trades at $197.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WM currently has a P/E ratio of 35.36, whereas WCN's P/E ratio is 81.45. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.33%, compared to WCN's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WM is more volatile compared to WCN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.

WM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 94.48B. In comparison, VEOEF has a market cap of 26.96B. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $234.80, while VEOEF trades at $36.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WM currently has a P/E ratio of 35.36, whereas VEOEF's P/E ratio is 21.22. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.33%, compared to VEOEF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WM is more volatile compared to VEOEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.

WM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 94.48B. In comparison, VEOEY has a market cap of 26.66B. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $234.80, while VEOEY trades at $18.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WM currently has a P/E ratio of 35.36, whereas VEOEY's P/E ratio is 21.74. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.33%, compared to VEOEY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WM is more volatile compared to VEOEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.

WM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 94.48B. In comparison, GFLU has a market cap of 24.98B. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $234.80, while GFLU trades at $70.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WM currently has a P/E ratio of 35.36, whereas GFLU's P/E ratio is -91.90. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.33%, compared to GFLU's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WM is less volatile compared to GFLU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.

WM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 94.48B. In comparison, GFL has a market cap of 19.68B. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $234.80, while GFL trades at $51.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WM currently has a P/E ratio of 35.36, whereas GFL's P/E ratio is -34.84. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.33%, compared to GFL's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, WM is less volatile compared to GFL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.

WM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 94.48B. In comparison, CLH has a market cap of 11.93B. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $234.80, while CLH trades at $222.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WM currently has a P/E ratio of 35.36, whereas CLH's P/E ratio is 30.85. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.33%, compared to CLH's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WM is more volatile compared to CLH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.

WM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 94.48B. In comparison, CWST has a market cap of 7.39B. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $234.80, while CWST trades at $118.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WM currently has a P/E ratio of 35.36, whereas CWST's P/E ratio is 537.45. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.33%, compared to CWST's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WM is less volatile compared to CWST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.

WM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 94.48B. In comparison, SRCL has a market cap of 5.75B. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $234.80, while SRCL trades at $61.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WM currently has a P/E ratio of 35.36, whereas SRCL's P/E ratio is 158.92. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.33%, compared to SRCL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WM is more volatile compared to SRCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.

WM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 94.48B. In comparison, TMRAY has a market cap of 4.79B. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $234.80, while TMRAY trades at $16.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WM currently has a P/E ratio of 35.36, whereas TMRAY's P/E ratio is 44.99. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.33%, compared to TMRAY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WM is more volatile compared to TMRAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.

WM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 94.48B. In comparison, TMRAF has a market cap of 4.73B. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $234.80, while TMRAF trades at $15.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WM currently has a P/E ratio of 35.36, whereas TMRAF's P/E ratio is 44.42. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.33%, compared to TMRAF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WM is less volatile compared to TMRAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.

WM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 94.48B. In comparison, FMOCF has a market cap of 4.68B. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $234.80, while FMOCF trades at $10.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WM currently has a P/E ratio of 35.36, whereas FMOCF's P/E ratio is 13.73. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.33%, compared to FMOCF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WM is more volatile compared to FMOCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.

WM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 94.48B. In comparison, TSPCF has a market cap of 3.39B. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $234.80, while TSPCF trades at $1.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WM currently has a P/E ratio of 35.36, whereas TSPCF's P/E ratio is 38.00. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.33%, compared to TSPCF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WM is more volatile compared to TSPCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.

WM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 94.48B. In comparison, CHFFF has a market cap of 2.89B. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $234.80, while CHFFF trades at $0.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WM currently has a P/E ratio of 35.36, whereas CHFFF's P/E ratio is 6.71. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.33%, compared to CHFFF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WM is more volatile compared to CHFFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.

WM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 94.48B. In comparison, SECYF has a market cap of 2.14B. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $234.80, while SECYF trades at $9.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WM currently has a P/E ratio of 35.36, whereas SECYF's P/E ratio is 13.65. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.33%, compared to SECYF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, WM is less volatile compared to SECYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.

WM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 94.48B. In comparison, DSKIF has a market cap of 1.19B. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $234.80, while DSKIF trades at $24.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WM currently has a P/E ratio of 35.36, whereas DSKIF's P/E ratio is 18.40. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.33%, compared to DSKIF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WM is less volatile compared to DSKIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.

WM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 94.48B. In comparison, BFSAF has a market cap of 1.17B. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $234.80, while BFSAF trades at $25.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WM currently has a P/E ratio of 35.36, whereas BFSAF's P/E ratio is 16.25. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.33%, compared to BFSAF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WM is less volatile compared to BFSAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.

WM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 94.48B. In comparison, HCCI has a market cap of 1.11B. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $234.80, while HCCI trades at $45.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WM currently has a P/E ratio of 35.36, whereas HCCI's P/E ratio is 14.22. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.33%, compared to HCCI's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, WM is more volatile compared to HCCI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.

WM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 94.48B. In comparison, TNJIF has a market cap of 1.03B. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $234.80, while TNJIF trades at $0.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WM currently has a P/E ratio of 35.36, whereas TNJIF's P/E ratio is 4.81. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.33%, compared to TNJIF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WM is less volatile compared to TNJIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.

WM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 94.48B. In comparison, FMOCY has a market cap of 909.66M. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $234.80, while FMOCY trades at $2.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WM currently has a P/E ratio of 35.36, whereas FMOCY's P/E ratio is 14.29. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.33%, compared to FMOCY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WM is less volatile compared to FMOCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.

WM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 94.48B. In comparison, SECVY has a market cap of 809.82M. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $234.80, while SECVY trades at $20.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WM currently has a P/E ratio of 35.36, whereas SECVY's P/E ratio is 16.60. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.33%, compared to SECVY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WM is more volatile compared to SECVY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.

WM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 94.48B. In comparison, HSC has a market cap of 729.61M. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $234.80, while HSC trades at $9.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WM currently has a P/E ratio of 35.36, whereas HSC's P/E ratio is -5.08. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.33%, compared to HSC's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WM is less volatile compared to HSC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.

WM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 94.48B. In comparison, SHMCF has a market cap of 620.04M. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $234.80, while SHMCF trades at $7.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WM currently has a P/E ratio of 35.36, whereas SHMCF's P/E ratio is 19.82. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.33%, compared to SHMCF's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, WM is less volatile compared to SHMCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.

WM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 94.48B. In comparison, NVRI has a market cap of 554.27M. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $234.80, while NVRI trades at $6.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WM currently has a P/E ratio of 35.36, whereas NVRI's P/E ratio is -4.46. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.33%, compared to NVRI's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, WM is less volatile compared to NVRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.

WM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 94.48B. In comparison, SZDEF has a market cap of 532.22M. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $234.80, while SZDEF trades at $0.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WM currently has a P/E ratio of 35.36, whereas SZDEF's P/E ratio is 13.00. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.33%, compared to SZDEF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WM is more volatile compared to SZDEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.

WM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 94.48B. In comparison, MEG has a market cap of 526.54M. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $234.80, while MEG trades at $15.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WM currently has a P/E ratio of 35.36, whereas MEG's P/E ratio is -6.84. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.33%, compared to MEG's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WM is less volatile compared to MEG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.

WM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 94.48B. In comparison, CHFFY has a market cap of 309.99M. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $234.80, while CHFFY trades at $4.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WM currently has a P/E ratio of 35.36, whereas CHFFY's P/E ratio is 4.95. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.33%, compared to CHFFY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WM is less volatile compared to CHFFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.

WM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 94.48B. In comparison, SCPJ has a market cap of 297.25M. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $234.80, while SCPJ trades at $325.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WM currently has a P/E ratio of 35.36, whereas SCPJ's P/E ratio is 21.59. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.33%, compared to SCPJ's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WM is less volatile compared to SCPJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.

WM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 94.48B. In comparison, AGXXF has a market cap of 274.01M. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $234.80, while AGXXF trades at $2.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WM currently has a P/E ratio of 35.36, whereas AGXXF's P/E ratio is -11.27. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.33%, compared to AGXXF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WM is more volatile compared to AGXXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.

WM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 94.48B. In comparison, MBRFF has a market cap of 243.27M. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $234.80, while MBRFF trades at $69.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WM currently has a P/E ratio of 35.36, whereas MBRFF's P/E ratio is 13.58. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.33%, compared to MBRFF's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, WM is less volatile compared to MBRFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.

WM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 94.48B. In comparison, AMBI has a market cap of 232.25M. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $234.80, while AMBI trades at $4.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WM currently has a P/E ratio of 35.36, whereas AMBI's P/E ratio is 32.23. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.33%, compared to AMBI's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WM is less volatile compared to AMBI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.

WM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 94.48B. In comparison, QNTFF has a market cap of 172.45M. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $234.80, while QNTFF trades at $0.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WM currently has a P/E ratio of 35.36, whereas QNTFF's P/E ratio is -1.79. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.33%, compared to QNTFF's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, WM is more volatile compared to QNTFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.

WM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 94.48B. In comparison, PESI has a market cap of 165.30M. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $234.80, while PESI trades at $8.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WM currently has a P/E ratio of 35.36, whereas PESI's P/E ratio is -6.90. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.33%, compared to PESI's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, WM is less volatile compared to PESI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.

WM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 94.48B. In comparison, ANRGF has a market cap of 144.20M. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $234.80, while ANRGF trades at $0.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WM currently has a P/E ratio of 35.36, whereas ANRGF's P/E ratio is -3.86. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.33%, compared to ANRGF's ROE of +0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, WM is less volatile compared to ANRGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.

WM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 94.48B. In comparison, QRHC has a market cap of 49.04M. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $234.80, while QRHC trades at $2.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WM currently has a P/E ratio of 35.36, whereas QRHC's P/E ratio is -3.26. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.33%, compared to QRHC's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, WM is less volatile compared to QRHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.

WM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 94.48B. In comparison, LNZA has a market cap of 45.52M. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $234.80, while LNZA trades at $0.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WM currently has a P/E ratio of 35.36, whereas LNZA's P/E ratio is -0.35. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.33%, compared to LNZA's ROE of -2.96%. Regarding short-term risk, WM is less volatile compared to LNZA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.

WM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 94.48B. In comparison, BTQNF has a market cap of 44.88M. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $234.80, while BTQNF trades at $34.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WM currently has a P/E ratio of 35.36, whereas BTQNF's P/E ratio is 15.15. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.33%, compared to BTQNF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, WM is more volatile compared to BTQNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.

WM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 94.48B. In comparison, ENGS has a market cap of 44.03M. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $234.80, while ENGS trades at $3.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WM currently has a P/E ratio of 35.36, whereas ENGS's P/E ratio is -30.90. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.33%, compared to ENGS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WM is less volatile compared to ENGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.

WM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 94.48B. In comparison, GCEI has a market cap of 39.72M. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $234.80, while GCEI trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WM currently has a P/E ratio of 35.36, whereas GCEI's P/E ratio is -6.96. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.33%, compared to GCEI's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, WM is less volatile compared to GCEI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.

WM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 94.48B. In comparison, ROOOF has a market cap of 32.39M. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $234.80, while ROOOF trades at $0.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WM currently has a P/E ratio of 35.36, whereas ROOOF's P/E ratio is -4.93. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.33%, compared to ROOOF's ROE of -2.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WM is more volatile compared to ROOOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.

WM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 94.48B. In comparison, LICY has a market cap of 29.88M. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $234.80, while LICY trades at $0.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WM currently has a P/E ratio of 35.36, whereas LICY's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.33%, compared to LICY's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WM is less volatile compared to LICY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.

WM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 94.48B. In comparison, JAN has a market cap of 27.14M. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $234.80, while JAN trades at $2.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WM currently has a P/E ratio of 35.36, whereas JAN's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.33%, compared to JAN's ROE of -1.40%. Regarding short-term risk, WM is less volatile compared to JAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.

WM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 94.48B. In comparison, VCIGF has a market cap of 22.81M. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $234.80, while VCIGF trades at $3.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WM currently has a P/E ratio of 35.36, whereas VCIGF's P/E ratio is 14.40. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.33%, compared to VCIGF's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, WM is more volatile compared to VCIGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.

WM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 94.48B. In comparison, CHRA has a market cap of 20.28M. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $234.80, while CHRA trades at $5.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WM currently has a P/E ratio of 35.36, whereas CHRA's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.33%, compared to CHRA's ROE of +20.59%. Regarding short-term risk, WM is more volatile compared to CHRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.

WM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 94.48B. In comparison, LEIC has a market cap of 17.58M. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $234.80, while LEIC trades at $0.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WM currently has a P/E ratio of 35.36, whereas LEIC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.33%, compared to LEIC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WM is less volatile compared to LEIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.

WM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 94.48B. In comparison, SEPOF has a market cap of 17.56M. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $234.80, while SEPOF trades at $0.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WM currently has a P/E ratio of 35.36, whereas SEPOF's P/E ratio is 18.41. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.33%, compared to SEPOF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WM is less volatile compared to SEPOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.

WM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 94.48B. In comparison, DXST has a market cap of 14.27M. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $234.80, while DXST trades at $0.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WM currently has a P/E ratio of 35.36, whereas DXST's P/E ratio is 7.32. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.33%, compared to DXST's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WM is less volatile compared to DXST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.

WM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 94.48B. In comparison, GWAV has a market cap of 13.70M. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $234.80, while GWAV trades at $0.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WM currently has a P/E ratio of 35.36, whereas GWAV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.33%, compared to GWAV's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, WM is less volatile compared to GWAV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.

WM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 94.48B. In comparison, CTRNF has a market cap of 13.06M. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $234.80, while CTRNF trades at $0.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WM currently has a P/E ratio of 35.36, whereas CTRNF's P/E ratio is -2.20. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.33%, compared to CTRNF's ROE of -3.91%. Regarding short-term risk, WM is more volatile compared to CTRNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.

WM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 94.48B. In comparison, ECLMF has a market cap of 12.72M. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $234.80, while ECLMF trades at $0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WM currently has a P/E ratio of 35.36, whereas ECLMF's P/E ratio is -1.95. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.33%, compared to ECLMF's ROE of -9.62%. Regarding short-term risk, WM is less volatile compared to ECLMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.

WM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 94.48B. In comparison, AWX has a market cap of 10.51M. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $234.80, while AWX trades at $2.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WM currently has a P/E ratio of 35.36, whereas AWX's P/E ratio is 7.93. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.33%, compared to AWX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WM is less volatile compared to AWX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.

WM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 94.48B. In comparison, TESI has a market cap of 9.89M. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $234.80, while TESI trades at $0.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WM currently has a P/E ratio of 35.36, whereas TESI's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.33%, compared to TESI's ROE of -13.60%. Regarding short-term risk, WM is less volatile compared to TESI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.

WM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 94.48B. In comparison, AQMS has a market cap of 9.70M. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $234.80, while AQMS trades at $1.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WM currently has a P/E ratio of 35.36, whereas AQMS's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.33%, compared to AQMS's ROE of -1.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WM is less volatile compared to AQMS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.

WM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 94.48B. In comparison, HUIPF has a market cap of 9.56M. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $234.80, while HUIPF trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WM currently has a P/E ratio of 35.36, whereas HUIPF's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.33%, compared to HUIPF's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, WM is less volatile compared to HUIPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.

WM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 94.48B. In comparison, BCCEF has a market cap of 7.72M. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $234.80, while BCCEF trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WM currently has a P/E ratio of 35.36, whereas BCCEF's P/E ratio is -4.00. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.33%, compared to BCCEF's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, WM is less volatile compared to BCCEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.

WM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 94.48B. In comparison, CDTG has a market cap of 7.50M. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $234.80, while CDTG trades at $0.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WM currently has a P/E ratio of 35.36, whereas CDTG's P/E ratio is 1.10. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.33%, compared to CDTG's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, WM is less volatile compared to CDTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.

WM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 94.48B. In comparison, NWLXF has a market cap of 6.51M. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $234.80, while NWLXF trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WM currently has a P/E ratio of 35.36, whereas NWLXF's P/E ratio is -1.39. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.33%, compared to NWLXF's ROE of -8.50%. Regarding short-term risk, WM is less volatile compared to NWLXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.

WM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 94.48B. In comparison, HNRC has a market cap of 6.05M. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $234.80, while HNRC trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WM currently has a P/E ratio of 35.36, whereas HNRC's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.33%, compared to HNRC's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WM is more volatile compared to HNRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.

WM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 94.48B. In comparison, CHNR has a market cap of 5.25M. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $234.80, while CHNR trades at $0.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WM currently has a P/E ratio of 35.36, whereas CHNR's P/E ratio is -13.30. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.33%, compared to CHNR's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WM is less volatile compared to CHNR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.

WM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 94.48B. In comparison, CWSFF has a market cap of 4.71M. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $234.80, while CWSFF trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WM currently has a P/E ratio of 35.36, whereas CWSFF's P/E ratio is -0.16. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.33%, compared to CWSFF's ROE of -1.53%. Regarding short-term risk, WM is more volatile compared to CWSFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.

WM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 94.48B. In comparison, OCLN has a market cap of 4.32M. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $234.80, while OCLN trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WM currently has a P/E ratio of 35.36, whereas OCLN's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.33%, compared to OCLN's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, WM is more volatile compared to OCLN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.

WM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 94.48B. In comparison, EAATF has a market cap of 3.94M. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $234.80, while EAATF trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WM currently has a P/E ratio of 35.36, whereas EAATF's P/E ratio is -0.32. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.33%, compared to EAATF's ROE of -4.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WM is more volatile compared to EAATF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.

WM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 94.48B. In comparison, SNRG has a market cap of 3.68M. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $234.80, while SNRG trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WM currently has a P/E ratio of 35.36, whereas SNRG's P/E ratio is -0.47. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.33%, compared to SNRG's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, WM is less volatile compared to SNRG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.

WM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 94.48B. In comparison, EQTE has a market cap of 2.90M. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $234.80, while EQTE trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WM currently has a P/E ratio of 35.36, whereas EQTE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.33%, compared to EQTE's ROE of -1.40%. Regarding short-term risk, WM is less volatile compared to EQTE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.

WM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 94.48B. In comparison, AFBG has a market cap of 2.51M. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $234.80, while AFBG trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WM currently has a P/E ratio of 35.36, whereas AFBG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.33%, compared to AFBG's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WM is less volatile compared to AFBG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.

WM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 94.48B. In comparison, SENR has a market cap of 2.42M. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $234.80, while SENR trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WM currently has a P/E ratio of 35.36, whereas SENR's P/E ratio is -1.30. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.33%, compared to SENR's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, WM is more volatile compared to SENR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.

WM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 94.48B. In comparison, EXSO has a market cap of 877120.00. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $234.80, while EXSO trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WM currently has a P/E ratio of 35.36, whereas EXSO's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.33%, compared to EXSO's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, WM is more volatile compared to EXSO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.

WM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 94.48B. In comparison, BWPC has a market cap of 639500.00. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $234.80, while BWPC trades at $0.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WM currently has a P/E ratio of 35.36, whereas BWPC's P/E ratio is -0.78. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.33%, compared to BWPC's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, WM is more volatile compared to BWPC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.

WM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 94.48B. In comparison, CRVYF has a market cap of 631412.00. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $234.80, while CRVYF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WM currently has a P/E ratio of 35.36, whereas CRVYF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.33%, compared to CRVYF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WM is more volatile compared to CRVYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.

WM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 94.48B. In comparison, GERS has a market cap of 565400.00. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $234.80, while GERS trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WM currently has a P/E ratio of 35.36, whereas GERS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.33%, compared to GERS's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, WM is less volatile compared to GERS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.

WM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 94.48B. In comparison, MCIM has a market cap of 505926.00. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $234.80, while MCIM trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WM currently has a P/E ratio of 35.36, whereas MCIM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.33%, compared to MCIM's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WM is more volatile compared to MCIM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.

WM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 94.48B. In comparison, GARB has a market cap of 474976.00. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $234.80, while GARB trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WM currently has a P/E ratio of 35.36, whereas GARB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.33%, compared to GARB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WM is less volatile compared to GARB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.

WM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 94.48B. In comparison, PTOI has a market cap of 424170.00. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $234.80, while PTOI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WM currently has a P/E ratio of 35.36, whereas PTOI's P/E ratio is -0.34. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.33%, compared to PTOI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WM is more volatile compared to PTOI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.

WM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 94.48B. In comparison, ECPL has a market cap of 406299.00. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $234.80, while ECPL trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WM currently has a P/E ratio of 35.36, whereas ECPL's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.33%, compared to ECPL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WM is more volatile compared to ECPL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.

WM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 94.48B. In comparison, DGWR has a market cap of 270863.00. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $234.80, while DGWR trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WM currently has a P/E ratio of 35.36, whereas DGWR's P/E ratio is 0.11. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.33%, compared to DGWR's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WM is more volatile compared to DGWR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.

WM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 94.48B. In comparison, JPEX has a market cap of 167269.00. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $234.80, while JPEX trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WM currently has a P/E ratio of 35.36, whereas JPEX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.33%, compared to JPEX's ROE of +0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, WM is more volatile compared to JPEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.

WM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 94.48B. In comparison, USLQ has a market cap of 146097.00. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $234.80, while USLQ trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WM currently has a P/E ratio of 35.36, whereas USLQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.33%, compared to USLQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WM is less volatile compared to USLQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.

WM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 94.48B. In comparison, IPWG has a market cap of 81843.00. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $234.80, while IPWG trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WM currently has a P/E ratio of 35.36, whereas IPWG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.33%, compared to IPWG's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WM is less volatile compared to IPWG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.

WM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 94.48B. In comparison, RGDEF has a market cap of 69359.00. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $234.80, while RGDEF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WM currently has a P/E ratio of 35.36, whereas RGDEF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.33%, compared to RGDEF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WM is more volatile compared to RGDEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.

WM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 94.48B. In comparison, MJWL has a market cap of 65199.00. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $234.80, while MJWL trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WM currently has a P/E ratio of 35.36, whereas MJWL's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.33%, compared to MJWL's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WM is more volatile compared to MJWL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.

WM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 94.48B. In comparison, BEEN has a market cap of 30867.00. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $234.80, while BEEN trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WM currently has a P/E ratio of 35.36, whereas BEEN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.33%, compared to BEEN's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, WM is more volatile compared to BEEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.

WM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 94.48B. In comparison, UVSS has a market cap of 28605.00. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $234.80, while UVSS trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WM currently has a P/E ratio of 35.36, whereas UVSS's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.33%, compared to UVSS's ROE of +1.40%. Regarding short-term risk, WM is more volatile compared to UVSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.

WM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 94.48B. In comparison, EVSP has a market cap of 28583.00. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $234.80, while EVSP trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WM currently has a P/E ratio of 35.36, whereas EVSP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.33%, compared to EVSP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WM is less volatile compared to EVSP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.

WM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 94.48B. In comparison, CLIRF has a market cap of 25507.00. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $234.80, while CLIRF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WM currently has a P/E ratio of 35.36, whereas CLIRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.33%, compared to CLIRF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, WM is less volatile compared to CLIRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.

WM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 94.48B. In comparison, ECEZ has a market cap of 25062.00. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $234.80, while ECEZ trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WM currently has a P/E ratio of 35.36, whereas ECEZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.33%, compared to ECEZ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WM is more volatile compared to ECEZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.

WM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 94.48B. In comparison, NXSI has a market cap of 20022.00. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $234.80, while NXSI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WM currently has a P/E ratio of 35.36, whereas NXSI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.33%, compared to NXSI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WM is less volatile compared to NXSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.

WM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 94.48B. In comparison, GMND has a market cap of 19173.00. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $234.80, while GMND trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WM currently has a P/E ratio of 35.36, whereas GMND's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.33%, compared to GMND's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WM is less volatile compared to GMND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.

WM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 94.48B. In comparison, EXPL has a market cap of 16744.00. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $234.80, while EXPL trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WM currently has a P/E ratio of 35.36, whereas EXPL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.33%, compared to EXPL's ROE of -1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, WM is more volatile compared to EXPL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.

WM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 94.48B. In comparison, SUNC has a market cap of 14606.00. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $234.80, while SUNC trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WM currently has a P/E ratio of 35.36, whereas SUNC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.33%, compared to SUNC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WM is less volatile compared to SUNC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.

WM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 94.48B. In comparison, TMEN has a market cap of 13576.00. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $234.80, while TMEN trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WM currently has a P/E ratio of 35.36, whereas TMEN's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.33%, compared to TMEN's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, WM is more volatile compared to TMEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.

WM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 94.48B. In comparison, GNCC has a market cap of 9449.00. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $234.80, while GNCC trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WM currently has a P/E ratio of 35.36, whereas GNCC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.33%, compared to GNCC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WM is less volatile compared to GNCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.

WM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 94.48B. In comparison, NWMH has a market cap of 6892.00. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $234.80, while NWMH trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WM currently has a P/E ratio of 35.36, whereas NWMH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.33%, compared to NWMH's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WM is less volatile compared to NWMH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.

WM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 94.48B. In comparison, BEHL has a market cap of 6564.00. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $234.80, while BEHL trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WM currently has a P/E ratio of 35.36, whereas BEHL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.33%, compared to BEHL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WM is less volatile compared to BEHL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.

WM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 94.48B. In comparison, CESX has a market cap of 4702.00. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $234.80, while CESX trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WM currently has a P/E ratio of 35.36, whereas CESX's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.33%, compared to CESX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WM is more volatile compared to CESX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.

WM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 94.48B. In comparison, CIWT has a market cap of 1534.00. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $234.80, while CIWT trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WM currently has a P/E ratio of 35.36, whereas CIWT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.33%, compared to CIWT's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WM is less volatile compared to CIWT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.

WM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 94.48B. In comparison, ECCI has a market cap of 581.00. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $234.80, while ECCI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WM currently has a P/E ratio of 35.36, whereas ECCI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.33%, compared to ECCI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WM is less volatile compared to ECCI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.

WM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 94.48B. In comparison, GETH has a market cap of 314.00. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $234.80, while GETH trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WM currently has a P/E ratio of 35.36, whereas GETH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.33%, compared to GETH's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, WM is less volatile compared to GETH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.

WM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 94.48B. In comparison, TRTI has a market cap of 298.00. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $234.80, while TRTI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WM currently has a P/E ratio of 35.36, whereas TRTI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.33%, compared to TRTI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WM is more volatile compared to TRTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.

WM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 94.48B. In comparison, SRPX has a market cap of 206.00. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $234.80, while SRPX trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WM currently has a P/E ratio of 35.36, whereas SRPX's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.33%, compared to SRPX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WM is more volatile compared to SRPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.

WM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 94.48B. In comparison, GRNO has a market cap of 92.00. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $234.80, while GRNO trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WM currently has a P/E ratio of 35.36, whereas GRNO's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.33%, compared to GRNO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WM is more volatile compared to GRNO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.

WM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 94.48B. In comparison, TRITF has a market cap of 85.00. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $234.80, while TRITF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WM currently has a P/E ratio of 35.36, whereas TRITF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.33%, compared to TRITF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WM is less volatile compared to TRITF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.

WM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 94.48B. In comparison, MPHD has a market cap of 33.00. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $234.80, while MPHD trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WM currently has a P/E ratio of 35.36, whereas MPHD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.33%, compared to MPHD's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WM is more volatile compared to MPHD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.

WM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 94.48B. In comparison, ALAN has a market cap of 4.00. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $234.80, while ALAN trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WM currently has a P/E ratio of 35.36, whereas ALAN's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.33%, compared to ALAN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WM is more volatile compared to ALAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.

WM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 94.48B. In comparison, SMED comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $234.80, while SMED trades at $8.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WM currently has a P/E ratio of 35.36, whereas SMED's P/E ratio is 36.46. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.33%, compared to SMED's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, WM is more volatile compared to SMED. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.

WM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 94.48B. In comparison, ECOLW comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $234.80, while ECOLW trades at $5.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WM currently has a P/E ratio of 35.36, whereas ECOLW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.33%, compared to ECOLW's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WM is more volatile compared to ECOLW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.

WM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 94.48B. In comparison, ECOL comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $234.80, while ECOL trades at $47.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WM currently has a P/E ratio of 35.36, whereas ECOL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.33%, compared to ECOL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WM is more volatile compared to ECOL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.

WM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 94.48B. In comparison, NES comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $234.80, while NES trades at $2.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WM currently has a P/E ratio of 35.36, whereas NES's P/E ratio is -1.32. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.33%, compared to NES's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, WM is less volatile compared to NES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.

WM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 94.48B. In comparison, ZWTYF comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $234.80, while ZWTYF trades at $1.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WM currently has a P/E ratio of 35.36, whereas ZWTYF's P/E ratio is 0.21. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.33%, compared to ZWTYF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WM is more volatile compared to ZWTYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.

WM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 94.48B. In comparison, CVA comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $234.80, while CVA trades at $20.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WM currently has a P/E ratio of 35.36, whereas CVA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.33%, compared to CVA's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WM is more volatile compared to CVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.

WM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WM stands at 94.48B. In comparison, BFFBF comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, WM is priced at $234.80, while BFFBF trades at $9.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WM currently has a P/E ratio of 35.36, whereas BFFBF's P/E ratio is -92.96. In terms of profitability, WM's ROE is +0.33%, compared to BFFBF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WM is more volatile compared to BFFBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WM.