WhiteHawk Minerals Corp (NYSE: WHK) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See WHK's competitors and their performance on the NYSE and across the wider stock market.
Peer Comparison Table: Oil & Gas Midstream Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more for WHK and its NYSE peers.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WHK | $26.32 | -0.04% | 606.6M | -8.91 | -$2.96 | +0.41% |
| ET-PE | $81.43 | +4.82% | 170.2B | 75.82 | $1.07 | +6.45% |
| ENB | $48.20 | -1.09% | 105.3B | 22.53 | $2.14 | +5.75% |
| WMB | $71.65 | -0.56% | 87.7B | 31.57 | $2.27 | +2.89% |
| EPD | $38.47 | -1.08% | 83.4B | 13.39 | $2.88 | +5.69% |
| ET | $20.90 | -1.14% | 71.9B | 14.22 | $1.47 | +6.45% |
| KMI | $31.72 | -0.38% | 70.7B | 20.75 | $1.53 | +3.72% |
| ET-PI | $11.40 | -0.09% | 70.6B | 7.68 | $1.48 | +6.45% |
| TRP | $60.48 | -1.72% | 62.9B | 23.53 | $2.57 | +4.08% |
| TRGP | $289.36 | -0.97% | 62.1B | 27.67 | $10.46 | +1.55% |
Stock Comparison
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET-PE)
WHK vs ET-PE Comparison September 2026
WhiteHawk Minerals Corp (NYSE: WHK) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHK stands at 606.6M. In comparison, ET-PE has a market cap of 170.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WHK is priced at $26.32 on the NYSE, while ET-PE trades at $81.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHK currently has a P/E ratio of -8.91, whereas ET-PE's P/E ratio is 75.82. In terms of profitability, WHK's ROE is -0.22%, compared to ET-PE's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WHK is more volatile compared to ET-PE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHK.Check ET-PE's competition here
Enbridge Inc. (NYSE: ENB)
WHK vs ENB Comparison September 2026
WhiteHawk Minerals Corp (NYSE: WHK) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHK stands at 606.6M. In comparison, ENB has a market cap of 105.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WHK is priced at $26.32 on the NYSE, while ENB trades at $48.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHK currently has a P/E ratio of -8.91, whereas ENB's P/E ratio is 22.53. In terms of profitability, WHK's ROE is -0.22%, compared to ENB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WHK is more volatile compared to ENB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHK.Check ENB's competition here
The Williams Companies, Inc. (NYSE: WMB)
WHK vs WMB Comparison September 2026
WhiteHawk Minerals Corp (NYSE: WHK) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHK stands at 606.6M. In comparison, WMB has a market cap of 87.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WHK is priced at $26.32 on the NYSE, while WMB trades at $71.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHK currently has a P/E ratio of -8.91, whereas WMB's P/E ratio is 31.57. In terms of profitability, WHK's ROE is -0.22%, compared to WMB's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, WHK is more volatile compared to WMB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHK.Check WMB's competition here
Enterprise Products Partners L.P. (NYSE: EPD)
WHK vs EPD Comparison September 2026
WhiteHawk Minerals Corp (NYSE: WHK) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHK stands at 606.6M. In comparison, EPD has a market cap of 83.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WHK is priced at $26.32 on the NYSE, while EPD trades at $38.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHK currently has a P/E ratio of -8.91, whereas EPD's P/E ratio is 13.39. In terms of profitability, WHK's ROE is -0.22%, compared to EPD's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, WHK is more volatile compared to EPD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHK.Check EPD's competition here
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET)
WHK vs ET Comparison September 2026
WhiteHawk Minerals Corp (NYSE: WHK) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHK stands at 606.6M. In comparison, ET has a market cap of 71.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WHK is priced at $26.32 on the NYSE, while ET trades at $20.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHK currently has a P/E ratio of -8.91, whereas ET's P/E ratio is 14.22. In terms of profitability, WHK's ROE is -0.22%, compared to ET's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WHK is more volatile compared to ET. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHK.Check ET's competition here
Kinder Morgan, Inc. (NYSE: KMI)
WHK vs KMI Comparison September 2026
WhiteHawk Minerals Corp (NYSE: WHK) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHK stands at 606.6M. In comparison, KMI has a market cap of 70.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WHK is priced at $26.32 on the NYSE, while KMI trades at $31.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHK currently has a P/E ratio of -8.91, whereas KMI's P/E ratio is 20.75. In terms of profitability, WHK's ROE is -0.22%, compared to KMI's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WHK is more volatile compared to KMI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHK.Check KMI's competition here
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET-PI)
WHK vs ET-PI Comparison September 2026
WhiteHawk Minerals Corp (NYSE: WHK) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHK stands at 606.6M. In comparison, ET-PI has a market cap of 70.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WHK is priced at $26.32 on the NYSE, while ET-PI trades at $11.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHK currently has a P/E ratio of -8.91, whereas ET-PI's P/E ratio is 7.68. In terms of profitability, WHK's ROE is -0.22%, compared to ET-PI's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WHK is more volatile compared to ET-PI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHK.Check ET-PI's competition here
TC Energy Corporation (NYSE: TRP)
WHK vs TRP Comparison September 2026
WhiteHawk Minerals Corp (NYSE: WHK) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHK stands at 606.6M. In comparison, TRP has a market cap of 62.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WHK is priced at $26.32 on the NYSE, while TRP trades at $60.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHK currently has a P/E ratio of -8.91, whereas TRP's P/E ratio is 23.53. In terms of profitability, WHK's ROE is -0.22%, compared to TRP's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WHK is more volatile compared to TRP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHK.Check TRP's competition here
Targa Resources Corp. (NYSE: TRGP)
WHK vs TRGP Comparison September 2026
WhiteHawk Minerals Corp (NYSE: WHK) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHK stands at 606.6M. In comparison, TRGP has a market cap of 62.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WHK is priced at $26.32 on the NYSE, while TRGP trades at $289.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHK currently has a P/E ratio of -8.91, whereas TRGP's P/E ratio is 27.67. In terms of profitability, WHK's ROE is -0.22%, compared to TRGP's ROE of +0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, WHK is more volatile compared to TRGP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHK.Check TRGP's competition here
MPLX Lp (NYSE: MPLX)
WHK vs MPLX Comparison September 2026
WhiteHawk Minerals Corp (NYSE: WHK) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHK stands at 606.6M. In comparison, MPLX has a market cap of 59.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WHK is priced at $26.32 on the NYSE, while MPLX trades at $59.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHK currently has a P/E ratio of -8.91, whereas MPLX's P/E ratio is 12.70. In terms of profitability, WHK's ROE is -0.22%, compared to MPLX's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, WHK is more volatile compared to MPLX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHK.Check MPLX's competition here
ONEOK, Inc. (NYSE: OKE)
WHK vs OKE Comparison September 2026
WhiteHawk Minerals Corp (NYSE: WHK) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHK stands at 606.6M. In comparison, OKE has a market cap of 57.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WHK is priced at $26.32 on the NYSE, while OKE trades at $91.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHK currently has a P/E ratio of -8.91, whereas OKE's P/E ratio is 15.83. In terms of profitability, WHK's ROE is -0.22%, compared to OKE's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WHK is more volatile compared to OKE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHK.Check OKE's competition here
Cheniere Energy, Inc. (NYSE: LNG)
WHK vs LNG Comparison September 2026
WhiteHawk Minerals Corp (NYSE: WHK) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHK stands at 606.6M. In comparison, LNG has a market cap of 57.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WHK is priced at $26.32 on the NYSE, while LNG trades at $274.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHK currently has a P/E ratio of -8.91, whereas LNG's P/E ratio is 20.44. In terms of profitability, WHK's ROE is -0.22%, compared to LNG's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, WHK is less volatile compared to LNG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHK.Check LNG's competition here
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET-PC)
WHK vs ET-PC Comparison September 2026
WhiteHawk Minerals Corp (NYSE: WHK) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHK stands at 606.6M. In comparison, ET-PC has a market cap of 50.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WHK is priced at $26.32 on the NYSE, while ET-PC trades at $25.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHK currently has a P/E ratio of -8.91, whereas ET-PC's P/E ratio is 23.81. In terms of profitability, WHK's ROE is -0.22%, compared to ET-PC's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WHK is more volatile compared to ET-PC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHK.Check ET-PC's competition here
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET-PD)
WHK vs ET-PD Comparison September 2026
WhiteHawk Minerals Corp (NYSE: WHK) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHK stands at 606.6M. In comparison, ET-PD has a market cap of 50.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WHK is priced at $26.32 on the NYSE, while ET-PD trades at $25.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHK currently has a P/E ratio of -8.91, whereas ET-PD's P/E ratio is 23.81. In terms of profitability, WHK's ROE is -0.22%, compared to ET-PD's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WHK is more volatile compared to ET-PD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHK.Check ET-PD's competition here
Enbridge Inc. 6.375 SNT18 B 78 (NYSE: ENBA)
WHK vs ENBA Comparison September 2026
WhiteHawk Minerals Corp (NYSE: WHK) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHK stands at 606.6M. In comparison, ENBA has a market cap of 41.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WHK is priced at $26.32 on the NYSE, while ENBA trades at $25.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHK currently has a P/E ratio of -8.91, whereas ENBA's P/E ratio is 24.08. In terms of profitability, WHK's ROE is -0.22%, compared to ENBA's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WHK is more volatile compared to ENBA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHK.Check ENBA's competition here
MPLX Lp (NYSE: MPLXP)
WHK vs MPLXP Comparison September 2026
WhiteHawk Minerals Corp (NYSE: WHK) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHK stands at 606.6M. In comparison, MPLXP has a market cap of 33.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WHK is priced at $26.32 on the NYSE, while MPLXP trades at $33.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHK currently has a P/E ratio of -8.91, whereas MPLXP's P/E ratio is 11.29. In terms of profitability, WHK's ROE is -0.22%, compared to MPLXP's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, WHK is more volatile compared to MPLXP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHK.Check MPLXP's competition here
Venture Global, Inc. (NYSE: VG)
WHK vs VG Comparison September 2026
WhiteHawk Minerals Corp (NYSE: WHK) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHK stands at 606.6M. In comparison, VG has a market cap of 33.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WHK is priced at $26.32 on the NYSE, while VG trades at $13.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHK currently has a P/E ratio of -8.91, whereas VG's P/E ratio is 10.76. In terms of profitability, WHK's ROE is -0.22%, compared to VG's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, WHK is more volatile compared to VG. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHK.Check VG's competition here
Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. (NYSE: CQP)
WHK vs CQP Comparison September 2026
WhiteHawk Minerals Corp (NYSE: WHK) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHK stands at 606.6M. In comparison, CQP has a market cap of 32B. Regarding current trading prices, WHK is priced at $26.32 on the NYSE, while CQP trades at $66.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHK currently has a P/E ratio of -8.91, whereas CQP's P/E ratio is 11.58. In terms of profitability, WHK's ROE is -0.22%, compared to CQP's ROE of +1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WHK is more volatile compared to CQP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHK.Check CQP's competition here
Pembina Pipeline Corporation (NYSE: PBA)
WHK vs PBA Comparison September 2026
WhiteHawk Minerals Corp (NYSE: WHK) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHK stands at 606.6M. In comparison, PBA has a market cap of 27B. Regarding current trading prices, WHK is priced at $26.32 on the NYSE, while PBA trades at $46.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHK currently has a P/E ratio of -8.91, whereas PBA's P/E ratio is 24.05. In terms of profitability, WHK's ROE is -0.22%, compared to PBA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WHK is more volatile compared to PBA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHK.Check PBA's competition here
TransCanada PipeLines Limited 6 (NYSE: TCPA)
WHK vs TCPA Comparison September 2026
WhiteHawk Minerals Corp (NYSE: WHK) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHK stands at 606.6M. In comparison, TCPA has a market cap of 22B. Regarding current trading prices, WHK is priced at $26.32 on the NYSE, while TCPA trades at $21.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHK currently has a P/E ratio of -8.91, whereas TCPA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WHK's ROE is -0.22%, compared to TCPA's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WHK is more volatile compared to TCPA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHK.Check TCPA's competition here
Western Midstream Partners, LP (NYSE: WES)
WHK vs WES Comparison September 2026
WhiteHawk Minerals Corp (NYSE: WHK) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHK stands at 606.6M. In comparison, WES has a market cap of 19.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WHK is priced at $26.32 on the NYSE, while WES trades at $46.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHK currently has a P/E ratio of -8.91, whereas WES's P/E ratio is 14.65. In terms of profitability, WHK's ROE is -0.22%, compared to WES's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, WHK is more volatile compared to WES. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHK.Check WES's competition here
Plains All American Pipeline, L.P. (NASDAQ: PAA)
WHK vs PAA Comparison September 2026
WhiteHawk Minerals Corp (NYSE: WHK) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHK stands at 606.6M. In comparison, PAA has a market cap of 17.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WHK is priced at $26.32 on the NYSE, while PAA trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHK currently has a P/E ratio of -8.91, whereas PAA's P/E ratio is 16.23. In terms of profitability, WHK's ROE is -0.22%, compared to PAA's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, WHK is more volatile compared to PAA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHK.Check PAA's competition here
Viper Energy, Inc. (NASDAQ: VNOM)
WHK vs VNOM Comparison September 2026
WhiteHawk Minerals Corp (NYSE: WHK) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHK stands at 606.6M. In comparison, VNOM has a market cap of 15B. Regarding current trading prices, WHK is priced at $26.32 on the NYSE, while VNOM trades at $41.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHK currently has a P/E ratio of -8.91, whereas VNOM's P/E ratio is 20.65. In terms of profitability, WHK's ROE is -0.22%, compared to VNOM's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WHK is more volatile compared to VNOM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHK.Check VNOM's competition here
Magellan Midstream Partners, L.P. (NYSE: MMP)
WHK vs MMP Comparison September 2026
WhiteHawk Minerals Corp (NYSE: WHK) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHK stands at 606.6M. In comparison, MMP has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WHK is priced at $26.32 on the NYSE, while MMP trades at $69.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHK currently has a P/E ratio of -8.91, whereas MMP's P/E ratio is 13.80. In terms of profitability, WHK's ROE is -0.22%, compared to MMP's ROE of -8.33%. Regarding short-term risk, WHK is more volatile compared to MMP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHK.Check MMP's competition here
DT Midstream, Inc. (NYSE: DTM)
WHK vs DTM Comparison September 2026
WhiteHawk Minerals Corp (NYSE: WHK) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHK stands at 606.6M. In comparison, DTM has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WHK is priced at $26.32 on the NYSE, while DTM trades at $125.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHK currently has a P/E ratio of -8.91, whereas DTM's P/E ratio is 27.68. In terms of profitability, WHK's ROE is -0.22%, compared to DTM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WHK is more volatile compared to DTM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHK.Check DTM's competition here
Antero Midstream Corporation (NYSE: AM)
WHK vs AM Comparison September 2026
WhiteHawk Minerals Corp (NYSE: WHK) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHK stands at 606.6M. In comparison, AM has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, WHK is priced at $26.32 on the NYSE, while AM trades at $21.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHK currently has a P/E ratio of -8.91, whereas AM's P/E ratio is 24.47. In terms of profitability, WHK's ROE is -0.22%, compared to AM's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, WHK is more volatile compared to AM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHK.Check AM's competition here
DCP Midstream, LP (NYSE: DCP)
WHK vs DCP Comparison September 2026
WhiteHawk Minerals Corp (NYSE: WHK) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHK stands at 606.6M. In comparison, DCP has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WHK is priced at $26.32 on the NYSE, while DCP trades at $41.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHK currently has a P/E ratio of -8.91, whereas DCP's P/E ratio is 7.75. In terms of profitability, WHK's ROE is -0.22%, compared to DCP's ROE of -351.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WHK is more volatile compared to DCP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHK.Check DCP's competition here
Hess Midstream LP (NYSE: HESM)
WHK vs HESM Comparison September 2026
WhiteHawk Minerals Corp (NYSE: WHK) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHK stands at 606.6M. In comparison, HESM has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WHK is priced at $26.32 on the NYSE, while HESM trades at $39.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHK currently has a P/E ratio of -8.91, whereas HESM's P/E ratio is 13.64. In terms of profitability, WHK's ROE is -0.22%, compared to HESM's ROE of +0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, WHK is more volatile compared to HESM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHK.Check HESM's competition here
South Bow Corporation (NYSE: SOBO)
WHK vs SOBO Comparison September 2026
WhiteHawk Minerals Corp (NYSE: WHK) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHK stands at 606.6M. In comparison, SOBO has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WHK is priced at $26.32 on the NYSE, while SOBO trades at $35.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHK currently has a P/E ratio of -8.91, whereas SOBO's P/E ratio is 17.38. In terms of profitability, WHK's ROE is -0.22%, compared to SOBO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, WHK is more volatile compared to SOBO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHK.Check SOBO's competition here
DCP Midstream, LP (NYSE: DCP-PC)
WHK vs DCP-PC Comparison September 2026
WhiteHawk Minerals Corp (NYSE: WHK) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHK stands at 606.6M. In comparison, DCP-PC has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WHK is priced at $26.32 on the NYSE, while DCP-PC trades at $25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHK currently has a P/E ratio of -8.91, whereas DCP-PC's P/E ratio is 57.73. In terms of profitability, WHK's ROE is -0.22%, compared to DCP-PC's ROE of -351.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WHK is more volatile compared to DCP-PC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHK.Check DCP-PC's competition here
EnLink Midstream, LLC (NYSE: ENLC)
WHK vs ENLC Comparison September 2026
WhiteHawk Minerals Corp (NYSE: WHK) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHK stands at 606.6M. In comparison, ENLC has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WHK is priced at $26.32 on the NYSE, while ENLC trades at $14.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHK currently has a P/E ratio of -8.91, whereas ENLC's P/E ratio is 64.18. In terms of profitability, WHK's ROE is -0.22%, compared to ENLC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WHK is more volatile compared to ENLC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHK.Check ENLC's competition here
Equitrans Midstream Corporation (NYSE: ETRN)
WHK vs ETRN Comparison September 2026
WhiteHawk Minerals Corp (NYSE: WHK) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHK stands at 606.6M. In comparison, ETRN has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WHK is priced at $26.32 on the NYSE, while ETRN trades at $12.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHK currently has a P/E ratio of -8.91, whereas ETRN's P/E ratio is 13.80. In terms of profitability, WHK's ROE is -0.22%, compared to ETRN's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, WHK is more volatile compared to ETRN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHK.Check ETRN's competition here
Plains GP Holdings LP (NASDAQ: PAGP)
WHK vs PAGP Comparison September 2026
WhiteHawk Minerals Corp (NYSE: WHK) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHK stands at 606.6M. In comparison, PAGP has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WHK is priced at $26.32 on the NYSE, while PAGP trades at $27.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHK currently has a P/E ratio of -8.91, whereas PAGP's P/E ratio is 10.16. In terms of profitability, WHK's ROE is -0.22%, compared to PAGP's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, WHK is more volatile compared to PAGP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHK.Check PAGP's competition here
Golar LNG Limited (NASDAQ: GLNG)
WHK vs GLNG Comparison September 2026
WhiteHawk Minerals Corp (NYSE: WHK) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHK stands at 606.6M. In comparison, GLNG has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WHK is priced at $26.32 on the NYSE, while GLNG trades at $51.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHK currently has a P/E ratio of -8.91, whereas GLNG's P/E ratio is 34.70. In terms of profitability, WHK's ROE is -0.22%, compared to GLNG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WHK is more volatile compared to GLNG. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHK.Check GLNG's competition here
Transportadora de Gas del Sur S.A. (NYSE: TGS)
WHK vs TGS Comparison September 2026
WhiteHawk Minerals Corp (NYSE: WHK) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHK stands at 606.6M. In comparison, TGS has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WHK is priced at $26.32 on the NYSE, while TGS trades at $27.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHK currently has a P/E ratio of -8.91, whereas TGS's P/E ratio is 10.86. In terms of profitability, WHK's ROE is -0.22%, compared to TGS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WHK is more volatile compared to TGS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHK.Check TGS's competition here
Kinetik Holdings Inc. (NYSE: KNTK)
WHK vs KNTK Comparison September 2026
WhiteHawk Minerals Corp (NYSE: WHK) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHK stands at 606.6M. In comparison, KNTK has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WHK is priced at $26.32 on the NYSE, while KNTK trades at $53.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHK currently has a P/E ratio of -8.91, whereas KNTK's P/E ratio is 19.29. In terms of profitability, WHK's ROE is -0.22%, compared to KNTK's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, WHK is more volatile compared to KNTK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHK.Check KNTK's competition here
Excelerate Energy, Inc. (NYSE: EE)
WHK vs EE Comparison September 2026
WhiteHawk Minerals Corp (NYSE: WHK) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHK stands at 606.6M. In comparison, EE has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WHK is priced at $26.32 on the NYSE, while EE trades at $33.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHK currently has a P/E ratio of -8.91, whereas EE's P/E ratio is 22.89. In terms of profitability, WHK's ROE is -0.22%, compared to EE's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WHK is less volatile compared to EE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHK.Check EE's competition here
SunocoCorp LLC (NYSE: SUNC)
WHK vs SUNC Comparison September 2026
WhiteHawk Minerals Corp (NYSE: WHK) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHK stands at 606.6M. In comparison, SUNC has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WHK is priced at $26.32 on the NYSE, while SUNC trades at $77.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHK currently has a P/E ratio of -8.91, whereas SUNC's P/E ratio is 17.90. In terms of profitability, WHK's ROE is -0.22%, compared to SUNC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WHK is less volatile compared to SUNC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHK.Check SUNC's competition here
Euronav N.V. (NYSE: EURN)
WHK vs EURN Comparison September 2026
WhiteHawk Minerals Corp (NYSE: WHK) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHK stands at 606.6M. In comparison, EURN has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WHK is priced at $26.32 on the NYSE, while EURN trades at $16.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHK currently has a P/E ratio of -8.91, whereas EURN's P/E ratio is 2.87. In terms of profitability, WHK's ROE is -0.22%, compared to EURN's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, WHK is more volatile compared to EURN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHK.Check EURN's competition here
Crestwood Equity Partners LP (NYSE: CEQP)
WHK vs CEQP Comparison September 2026
WhiteHawk Minerals Corp (NYSE: WHK) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHK stands at 606.6M. In comparison, CEQP has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, WHK is priced at $26.32 on the NYSE, while CEQP trades at $28.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHK currently has a P/E ratio of -8.91, whereas CEQP's P/E ratio is 21.91. In terms of profitability, WHK's ROE is -0.22%, compared to CEQP's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WHK is more volatile compared to CEQP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHK.Check CEQP's competition here
Delek Logistics Partners, LP (NYSE: DKL)
WHK vs DKL Comparison September 2026
WhiteHawk Minerals Corp (NYSE: WHK) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHK stands at 606.6M. In comparison, DKL has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, WHK is priced at $26.32 on the NYSE, while DKL trades at $55.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHK currently has a P/E ratio of -8.91, whereas DKL's P/E ratio is 19.40. In terms of profitability, WHK's ROE is -0.22%, compared to DKL's ROE of -9.36%. Regarding short-term risk, WHK is less volatile compared to DKL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHK.Check DKL's competition here
NuStar Energy L.P. (NYSE: NS)
WHK vs NS Comparison September 2026
WhiteHawk Minerals Corp (NYSE: WHK) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHK stands at 606.6M. In comparison, NS has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WHK is priced at $26.32 on the NYSE, while NS trades at $21.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHK currently has a P/E ratio of -8.91, whereas NS's P/E ratio is 84.46. In terms of profitability, WHK's ROE is -0.22%, compared to NS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, WHK is more volatile compared to NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHK.Check NS's competition here
NuStar Energy L.P. (NYSE: NS-PB)
WHK vs NS-PB Comparison September 2026
WhiteHawk Minerals Corp (NYSE: WHK) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHK stands at 606.6M. In comparison, NS-PB has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WHK is priced at $26.32 on the NYSE, while NS-PB trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHK currently has a P/E ratio of -8.91, whereas NS-PB's P/E ratio is -19.83. In terms of profitability, WHK's ROE is -0.22%, compared to NS-PB's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, WHK is more volatile compared to NS-PB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHK.Check NS-PB's competition here
NuStar Energy L.P. (NYSE: NS-PA)
WHK vs NS-PA Comparison September 2026
WhiteHawk Minerals Corp (NYSE: WHK) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHK stands at 606.6M. In comparison, NS-PA has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WHK is priced at $26.32 on the NYSE, while NS-PA trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHK currently has a P/E ratio of -8.91, whereas NS-PA's P/E ratio is -8.66. In terms of profitability, WHK's ROE is -0.22%, compared to NS-PA's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, WHK is more volatile compared to NS-PA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHK.Check NS-PA's competition here
Holly Energy Partners, L.P. (NYSE: HEP)
WHK vs HEP Comparison September 2026
WhiteHawk Minerals Corp (NYSE: WHK) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHK stands at 606.6M. In comparison, HEP has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WHK is priced at $26.32 on the NYSE, while HEP trades at $20.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHK currently has a P/E ratio of -8.91, whereas HEP's P/E ratio is 10.76. In terms of profitability, WHK's ROE is -0.22%, compared to HEP's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, WHK is more volatile compared to HEP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHK.Check HEP's competition here
Seapeak LLC (NYSE: SEAL-PA)
WHK vs SEAL-PA Comparison September 2026
WhiteHawk Minerals Corp (NYSE: WHK) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHK stands at 606.6M. In comparison, SEAL-PA has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WHK is priced at $26.32 on the NYSE, while SEAL-PA trades at $25.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHK currently has a P/E ratio of -8.91, whereas SEAL-PA's P/E ratio is 56.07. In terms of profitability, WHK's ROE is -0.22%, compared to SEAL-PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WHK is more volatile compared to SEAL-PA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHK.Check SEAL-PA's competition here
Seapeak LLC (NYSE: SEAL-PB)
WHK vs SEAL-PB Comparison September 2026
WhiteHawk Minerals Corp (NYSE: WHK) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHK stands at 606.6M. In comparison, SEAL-PB has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WHK is priced at $26.32 on the NYSE, while SEAL-PB trades at $25.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHK currently has a P/E ratio of -8.91, whereas SEAL-PB's P/E ratio is 55.70. In terms of profitability, WHK's ROE is -0.22%, compared to SEAL-PB's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WHK is more volatile compared to SEAL-PB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHK.Check SEAL-PB's competition here
Dorian LPG Ltd. (NYSE: LPG)
WHK vs LPG Comparison September 2026
WhiteHawk Minerals Corp (NYSE: WHK) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHK stands at 606.6M. In comparison, LPG has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WHK is priced at $26.32 on the NYSE, while LPG trades at $56.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHK currently has a P/E ratio of -8.91, whereas LPG's P/E ratio is 8.29. In terms of profitability, WHK's ROE is -0.22%, compared to LPG's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, WHK is more volatile compared to LPG. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHK.Check LPG's competition here
NuStar Energy L.P. 9.00% CUM PFD C (NYSE: NS-PC)
WHK vs NS-PC Comparison September 2026
WhiteHawk Minerals Corp (NYSE: WHK) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHK stands at 606.6M. In comparison, NS-PC has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WHK is priced at $26.32 on the NYSE, while NS-PC trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHK currently has a P/E ratio of -8.91, whereas NS-PC's P/E ratio is 20.10. In terms of profitability, WHK's ROE is -0.22%, compared to NS-PC's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, WHK is more volatile compared to NS-PC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHK.Check NS-PC's competition here
Rattler Midstream LP (NASDAQ: RTLR)
WHK vs RTLR Comparison September 2026
WhiteHawk Minerals Corp (NYSE: WHK) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHK stands at 606.6M. In comparison, RTLR has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WHK is priced at $26.32 on the NYSE, while RTLR trades at $15.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHK currently has a P/E ratio of -8.91, whereas RTLR's P/E ratio is 16.37. In terms of profitability, WHK's ROE is -0.22%, compared to RTLR's ROE of -3260.98%. Regarding short-term risk, WHK is more volatile compared to RTLR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHK.Check RTLR's competition here
NGL Energy Partners LP (NYSE: NGL-PC)
WHK vs NGL-PC Comparison September 2026
WhiteHawk Minerals Corp (NYSE: WHK) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHK stands at 606.6M. In comparison, NGL-PC has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, WHK is priced at $26.32 on the NYSE, while NGL-PC trades at $26.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHK currently has a P/E ratio of -8.91, whereas NGL-PC's P/E ratio is -9.15. In terms of profitability, WHK's ROE is -0.22%, compared to NGL-PC's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, WHK is more volatile compared to NGL-PC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHK.Check NGL-PC's competition here
NGL Energy Partners LP (NYSE: NGL-PB)
WHK vs NGL-PB Comparison September 2026
WhiteHawk Minerals Corp (NYSE: WHK) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHK stands at 606.6M. In comparison, NGL-PB has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, WHK is priced at $26.32 on the NYSE, while NGL-PB trades at $25.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHK currently has a P/E ratio of -8.91, whereas NGL-PB's P/E ratio is -9.09. In terms of profitability, WHK's ROE is -0.22%, compared to NGL-PB's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, WHK is more volatile compared to NGL-PB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHK.Check NGL-PB's competition here
NGL Energy Partners LP (NYSE: NGL)
WHK vs NGL Comparison September 2026
WhiteHawk Minerals Corp (NYSE: WHK) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHK stands at 606.6M. In comparison, NGL has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, WHK is priced at $26.32 on the NYSE, while NGL trades at $16.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHK currently has a P/E ratio of -8.91, whereas NGL's P/E ratio is -5.73. In terms of profitability, WHK's ROE is -0.22%, compared to NGL's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, WHK is less volatile compared to NGL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHK.Check NGL's competition here
NuStar Logistics, L.P. SB NT FX/FL 43 (NYSE: NSS)
WHK vs NSS Comparison September 2026
WhiteHawk Minerals Corp (NYSE: WHK) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHK stands at 606.6M. In comparison, NSS has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, WHK is priced at $26.32 on the NYSE, while NSS trades at $25.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHK currently has a P/E ratio of -8.91, whereas NSS's P/E ratio is -508.80. In terms of profitability, WHK's ROE is -0.22%, compared to NSS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, WHK is more volatile compared to NSS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHK.Check NSS's competition here
Genesis Energy, L.P. (NYSE: GEL)
WHK vs GEL Comparison September 2026
WhiteHawk Minerals Corp (NYSE: WHK) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHK stands at 606.6M. In comparison, GEL has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WHK is priced at $26.32 on the NYSE, while GEL trades at $15.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHK currently has a P/E ratio of -8.91, whereas GEL's P/E ratio is 79.26. In terms of profitability, WHK's ROE is -0.22%, compared to GEL's ROE of +1.41%. Regarding short-term risk, WHK is more volatile compared to GEL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHK.Check GEL's competition here
Global Partners LP (NYSE: GLP)
WHK vs GLP Comparison September 2026
WhiteHawk Minerals Corp (NYSE: WHK) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHK stands at 606.6M. In comparison, GLP has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WHK is priced at $26.32 on the NYSE, while GLP trades at $50.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHK currently has a P/E ratio of -8.91, whereas GLP's P/E ratio is 10.31. In terms of profitability, WHK's ROE is -0.22%, compared to GLP's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, WHK is more volatile compared to GLP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHK.Check GLP's competition here
Permian Basin Royalty Trust (NYSE: PBT)
WHK vs PBT Comparison September 2026
WhiteHawk Minerals Corp (NYSE: WHK) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHK stands at 606.6M. In comparison, PBT has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WHK is priced at $26.32 on the NYSE, while PBT trades at $33.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHK currently has a P/E ratio of -8.91, whereas PBT's P/E ratio is 95.06. In terms of profitability, WHK's ROE is -0.22%, compared to PBT's ROE of +99.89%. Regarding short-term risk, WHK is less volatile compared to PBT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHK.Check PBT's competition here
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN)
WHK vs TEN Comparison September 2026
WhiteHawk Minerals Corp (NYSE: WHK) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHK stands at 606.6M. In comparison, TEN has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WHK is priced at $26.32 on the NYSE, while TEN trades at $50.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHK currently has a P/E ratio of -8.91, whereas TEN's P/E ratio is 5.92. In terms of profitability, WHK's ROE is -0.22%, compared to TEN's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WHK is less volatile compared to TEN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHK.Check TEN's competition here
GasLog Ltd. (NYSE: GLOG-PA)
WHK vs GLOG-PA Comparison September 2026
WhiteHawk Minerals Corp (NYSE: WHK) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHK stands at 606.6M. In comparison, GLOG-PA has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WHK is priced at $26.32 on the NYSE, while GLOG-PA trades at $25.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHK currently has a P/E ratio of -8.91, whereas GLOG-PA's P/E ratio is 44.93. In terms of profitability, WHK's ROE is -0.22%, compared to GLOG-PA's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WHK is more volatile compared to GLOG-PA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHK.Check GLOG-PA's competition here
Teekay Corporation (NYSE: TK)
WHK vs TK Comparison September 2026
WhiteHawk Minerals Corp (NYSE: WHK) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHK stands at 606.6M. In comparison, TK has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WHK is priced at $26.32 on the NYSE, while TK trades at $14.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHK currently has a P/E ratio of -8.91, whereas TK's P/E ratio is 6.90. In terms of profitability, WHK's ROE is -0.22%, compared to TK's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, WHK is more volatile compared to TK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHK.Check TK's competition here
New Fortress Energy Inc. Series A Mandatorily Convertible Preferred Stock (NASDAQ: NFEGP)
WHK vs NFEGP Comparison September 2026
WhiteHawk Minerals Corp (NYSE: WHK) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHK stands at 606.6M. In comparison, NFEGP has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WHK is priced at $26.32 on the NYSE, while NFEGP trades at $495.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHK currently has a P/E ratio of -8.91, whereas NFEGP's P/E ratio is -1.46. In terms of profitability, WHK's ROE is -0.22%, compared to NFEGP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WHK is less volatile compared to NFEGP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHK.Check NFEGP's competition here
Sabine Royalty Trust (NYSE: SBR)
WHK vs SBR Comparison September 2026
WhiteHawk Minerals Corp (NYSE: WHK) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHK stands at 606.6M. In comparison, SBR has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WHK is priced at $26.32 on the NYSE, while SBR trades at $72.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHK currently has a P/E ratio of -8.91, whereas SBR's P/E ratio is 15.43. In terms of profitability, WHK's ROE is -0.22%, compared to SBR's ROE of +9.62%. Regarding short-term risk, WHK is more volatile compared to SBR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHK.Check SBR's competition here
Global Partners LP (NYSE: GLP-PA)
WHK vs GLP-PA Comparison September 2026
WhiteHawk Minerals Corp (NYSE: WHK) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHK stands at 606.6M. In comparison, GLP-PA has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, WHK is priced at $26.32 on the NYSE, while GLP-PA trades at $43.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHK currently has a P/E ratio of -8.91, whereas GLP-PA's P/E ratio is 21.49. In terms of profitability, WHK's ROE is -0.22%, compared to GLP-PA's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, WHK is more volatile compared to GLP-PA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHK.Check GLP-PA's competition here
Crestwood Equity Partners LP (NYSE: CEQP-P)
WHK vs CEQP-P Comparison September 2026
WhiteHawk Minerals Corp (NYSE: WHK) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHK stands at 606.6M. In comparison, CEQP-P has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, WHK is priced at $26.32 on the NYSE, while CEQP-P trades at $9.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHK currently has a P/E ratio of -8.91, whereas CEQP-P's P/E ratio is -12.22. In terms of profitability, WHK's ROE is -0.22%, compared to CEQP-P's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WHK is less volatile compared to CEQP-P. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHK.Check CEQP-P's competition here
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TNP-PE)
WHK vs TNP-PE Comparison September 2026
WhiteHawk Minerals Corp (NYSE: WHK) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHK stands at 606.6M. In comparison, TNP-PE has a market cap of 991.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WHK is priced at $26.32 on the NYSE, while TNP-PE trades at $78.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHK currently has a P/E ratio of -8.91, whereas TNP-PE's P/E ratio is -8.23. In terms of profitability, WHK's ROE is -0.22%, compared to TNP-PE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WHK is less volatile compared to TNP-PE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHK.Check TNP-PE's competition here
Global Partners LP (NYSE: GLP-PB)
WHK vs GLP-PB Comparison September 2026
WhiteHawk Minerals Corp (NYSE: WHK) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHK stands at 606.6M. In comparison, GLP-PB has a market cap of 863M. Regarding current trading prices, WHK is priced at $26.32 on the NYSE, while GLP-PB trades at $25.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHK currently has a P/E ratio of -8.91, whereas GLP-PB's P/E ratio is 7.08. In terms of profitability, WHK's ROE is -0.22%, compared to GLP-PB's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, WHK is more volatile compared to GLP-PB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHK.Check GLP-PB's competition here
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TNP)
WHK vs TNP Comparison September 2026
WhiteHawk Minerals Corp (NYSE: WHK) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHK stands at 606.6M. In comparison, TNP has a market cap of 539.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WHK is priced at $26.32 on the NYSE, while TNP trades at $18.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHK currently has a P/E ratio of -8.91, whereas TNP's P/E ratio is 3.69. In terms of profitability, WHK's ROE is -0.22%, compared to TNP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WHK is less volatile compared to TNP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHK.Check TNP's competition here
Summit Midstream Corp. (NYSE: SMC)
WHK vs SMC Comparison September 2026
WhiteHawk Minerals Corp (NYSE: WHK) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHK stands at 606.6M. In comparison, SMC has a market cap of 439.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WHK is priced at $26.32 on the NYSE, while SMC trades at $31.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHK currently has a P/E ratio of -8.91, whereas SMC's P/E ratio is -28.64. In terms of profitability, WHK's ROE is -0.22%, compared to SMC's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WHK is more volatile compared to SMC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHK.Check SMC's competition here
GasLog Partners LP (NYSE: GLOP-PB)
WHK vs GLOP-PB Comparison September 2026
WhiteHawk Minerals Corp (NYSE: WHK) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHK stands at 606.6M. In comparison, GLOP-PB has a market cap of 411.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WHK is priced at $26.32 on the NYSE, while GLOP-PB trades at $25.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHK currently has a P/E ratio of -8.91, whereas GLOP-PB's P/E ratio is -58.03. In terms of profitability, WHK's ROE is -0.22%, compared to GLOP-PB's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WHK is more volatile compared to GLOP-PB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHK.Check GLOP-PB's competition here
GasLog Partners LP (NYSE: GLOP-PC)
WHK vs GLOP-PC Comparison September 2026
WhiteHawk Minerals Corp (NYSE: WHK) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHK stands at 606.6M. In comparison, GLOP-PC has a market cap of 410.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WHK is priced at $26.32 on the NYSE, while GLOP-PC trades at $25.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHK currently has a P/E ratio of -8.91, whereas GLOP-PC's P/E ratio is 37.08. In terms of profitability, WHK's ROE is -0.22%, compared to GLOP-PC's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WHK is more volatile compared to GLOP-PC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHK.Check GLOP-PC's competition here
GasLog Partners LP (NYSE: GLOP-PA)
WHK vs GLOP-PA Comparison September 2026
WhiteHawk Minerals Corp (NYSE: WHK) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHK stands at 606.6M. In comparison, GLOP-PA has a market cap of 405.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WHK is priced at $26.32 on the NYSE, while GLOP-PA trades at $25.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHK currently has a P/E ratio of -8.91, whereas GLOP-PA's P/E ratio is 36.67. In terms of profitability, WHK's ROE is -0.22%, compared to GLOP-PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WHK is more volatile compared to GLOP-PA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHK.Check GLOP-PA's competition here
Summit Midstream Partners, LP (NYSE: SMLP)
WHK vs SMLP Comparison September 2026
WhiteHawk Minerals Corp (NYSE: WHK) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHK stands at 606.6M. In comparison, SMLP has a market cap of 405.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WHK is priced at $26.32 on the NYSE, while SMLP trades at $38.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHK currently has a P/E ratio of -8.91, whereas SMLP's P/E ratio is 5.30. In terms of profitability, WHK's ROE is -0.22%, compared to SMLP's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WHK is less volatile compared to SMLP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHK.Check SMLP's competition here
Diamond S Shipping Inc. (NYSE: DSSI)
WHK vs DSSI Comparison September 2026
WhiteHawk Minerals Corp (NYSE: WHK) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHK stands at 606.6M. In comparison, DSSI has a market cap of 384.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WHK is priced at $26.32 on the NYSE, while DSSI trades at $9.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHK currently has a P/E ratio of -8.91, whereas DSSI's P/E ratio is -6.99. In terms of profitability, WHK's ROE is -0.22%, compared to DSSI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WHK is less volatile compared to DSSI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHK.Check DSSI's competition here
Evolve Transition Infrastructure LP (AMEX: SNMP)
WHK vs SNMP Comparison September 2026
WhiteHawk Minerals Corp (NYSE: WHK) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHK stands at 606.6M. In comparison, SNMP has a market cap of 338.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WHK is priced at $26.32 on the NYSE, while SNMP trades at $1.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHK currently has a P/E ratio of -8.91, whereas SNMP's P/E ratio is -3.91. In terms of profitability, WHK's ROE is -0.22%, compared to SNMP's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, WHK is more volatile compared to SNMP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHK.Check SNMP's competition here
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TNP-PF)
WHK vs TNP-PF Comparison September 2026
WhiteHawk Minerals Corp (NYSE: WHK) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHK stands at 606.6M. In comparison, TNP-PF has a market cap of 334.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WHK is priced at $26.32 on the NYSE, while TNP-PF trades at $27.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHK currently has a P/E ratio of -8.91, whereas TNP-PF's P/E ratio is -2.84. In terms of profitability, WHK's ROE is -0.22%, compared to TNP-PF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WHK is more volatile compared to TNP-PF. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHK.Check TNP-PF's competition here
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TNP-PD)
WHK vs TNP-PD Comparison September 2026
WhiteHawk Minerals Corp (NYSE: WHK) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHK stands at 606.6M. In comparison, TNP-PD has a market cap of 321.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WHK is priced at $26.32 on the NYSE, while TNP-PD trades at $25.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHK currently has a P/E ratio of -8.91, whereas TNP-PD's P/E ratio is -2.65. In terms of profitability, WHK's ROE is -0.22%, compared to TNP-PD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WHK is more volatile compared to TNP-PD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHK.Check TNP-PD's competition here
Green Plains Partners LP (NASDAQ: GPP)
WHK vs GPP Comparison September 2026
WhiteHawk Minerals Corp (NYSE: WHK) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHK stands at 606.6M. In comparison, GPP has a market cap of 286.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WHK is priced at $26.32 on the NYSE, while GPP trades at $12.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHK currently has a P/E ratio of -8.91, whereas GPP's P/E ratio is 7.60. In terms of profitability, WHK's ROE is -0.22%, compared to GPP's ROE of +26.63%. Regarding short-term risk, WHK is more volatile compared to GPP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHK.Check GPP's competition here
GasLog Partners LP (NYSE: GLOP)
WHK vs GLOP Comparison September 2026
WhiteHawk Minerals Corp (NYSE: WHK) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHK stands at 606.6M. In comparison, GLOP has a market cap of 277.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WHK is priced at $26.32 on the NYSE, while GLOP trades at $5.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHK currently has a P/E ratio of -8.91, whereas GLOP's P/E ratio is 3.07. In terms of profitability, WHK's ROE is -0.22%, compared to GLOP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WHK is less volatile compared to GLOP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHK.Check GLOP's competition here
Brooge Energy Limited (NASDAQ: BROG)
WHK vs BROG Comparison September 2026
WhiteHawk Minerals Corp (NYSE: WHK) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHK stands at 606.6M. In comparison, BROG has a market cap of 232.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WHK is priced at $26.32 on the NYSE, while BROG trades at $2.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHK currently has a P/E ratio of -8.91, whereas BROG's P/E ratio is 52.00. In terms of profitability, WHK's ROE is -0.22%, compared to BROG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WHK is less volatile compared to BROG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHK.Check BROG's competition here
Imperial Petroleum Inc. (NASDAQ: IMPP)
WHK vs IMPP Comparison September 2026
WhiteHawk Minerals Corp (NYSE: WHK) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHK stands at 606.6M. In comparison, IMPP has a market cap of 212.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WHK is priced at $26.32 on the NYSE, while IMPP trades at $5.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHK currently has a P/E ratio of -8.91, whereas IMPP's P/E ratio is 2.82. In terms of profitability, WHK's ROE is -0.22%, compared to IMPP's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WHK is less volatile compared to IMPP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHK.Check IMPP's competition here
Imperial Petroleum Inc. (NASDAQ: IMPPP)
WHK vs IMPPP Comparison September 2026
WhiteHawk Minerals Corp (NYSE: WHK) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHK stands at 606.6M. In comparison, IMPPP has a market cap of 185.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WHK is priced at $26.32 on the NYSE, while IMPPP trades at $26.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHK currently has a P/E ratio of -8.91, whereas IMPPP's P/E ratio is 12.66. In terms of profitability, WHK's ROE is -0.22%, compared to IMPPP's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WHK is more volatile compared to IMPPP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHK.Check IMPPP's competition here
Martin Midstream Partners L.P. (NASDAQ: MMLP)
WHK vs MMLP Comparison September 2026
WhiteHawk Minerals Corp (NYSE: WHK) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHK stands at 606.6M. In comparison, MMLP has a market cap of 85.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WHK is priced at $26.32 on the NYSE, while MMLP trades at $2.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHK currently has a P/E ratio of -8.91, whereas MMLP's P/E ratio is -5.76. In terms of profitability, WHK's ROE is -0.22%, compared to MMLP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WHK is less volatile compared to MMLP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHK.Check MMLP's competition here
Dynagas LNG Partners LP (NYSE: DLNG-PB)
WHK vs DLNG-PB Comparison September 2026
WhiteHawk Minerals Corp (NYSE: WHK) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHK stands at 606.6M. In comparison, DLNG-PB has a market cap of 83.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WHK is priced at $26.32 on the NYSE, while DLNG-PB trades at $25.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHK currently has a P/E ratio of -8.91, whereas DLNG-PB's P/E ratio is 22.51. In terms of profitability, WHK's ROE is -0.22%, compared to DLNG-PB's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WHK is more volatile compared to DLNG-PB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHK.Check DLNG-PB's competition here
New Fortress Energy Inc. (NASDAQ: NFE)
WHK vs NFE Comparison September 2026
WhiteHawk Minerals Corp (NYSE: WHK) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHK stands at 606.6M. In comparison, NFE has a market cap of 61.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WHK is priced at $26.32 on the NYSE, while NFE trades at $10.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHK currently has a P/E ratio of -8.91, whereas NFE's P/E ratio is -2.18. In terms of profitability, WHK's ROE is -0.22%, compared to NFE's ROE of -17.38%. Regarding short-term risk, WHK is less volatile compared to NFE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHK.Check NFE's competition here
TMD Energy Limited (AMEX: TMDE)
WHK vs TMDE Comparison September 2026
WhiteHawk Minerals Corp (NYSE: WHK) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHK stands at 606.6M. In comparison, TMDE has a market cap of 16.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WHK is priced at $26.32 on the NYSE, while TMDE trades at $0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHK currently has a P/E ratio of -8.91, whereas TMDE's P/E ratio is 8.76. In terms of profitability, WHK's ROE is -0.22%, compared to TMDE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WHK is less volatile compared to TMDE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHK.Check TMDE's competition here
Robin Energy Ltd. Common Stock When Issued (NASDAQ: RBNEV)
WHK vs RBNEV Comparison September 2026
WhiteHawk Minerals Corp (NYSE: WHK) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHK stands at 606.6M. In comparison, RBNEV has a market cap of 13.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WHK is priced at $26.32 on the NYSE, while RBNEV trades at $5.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHK currently has a P/E ratio of -8.91, whereas RBNEV's P/E ratio is -18.13. In terms of profitability, WHK's ROE is -0.22%, compared to RBNEV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WHK is less volatile compared to RBNEV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHK.Check RBNEV's competition here
CBL International Limited (NASDAQ: BANL)
WHK vs BANL Comparison September 2026
WhiteHawk Minerals Corp (NYSE: WHK) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHK stands at 606.6M. In comparison, BANL has a market cap of 11.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WHK is priced at $26.32 on the NYSE, while BANL trades at $5.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHK currently has a P/E ratio of -8.91, whereas BANL's P/E ratio is -117.59. In terms of profitability, WHK's ROE is -0.22%, compared to BANL's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WHK is similarly volatile compared to BANL. This indicates similar risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHK.Check BANL's competition here
Marine Petroleum Trust (NASDAQ: MARPS)
WHK vs MARPS Comparison September 2026
WhiteHawk Minerals Corp (NYSE: WHK) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHK stands at 606.6M. In comparison, MARPS has a market cap of 9M. Regarding current trading prices, WHK is priced at $26.32 on the NYSE, while MARPS trades at $4.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHK currently has a P/E ratio of -8.91, whereas MARPS's P/E ratio is 14.09. In terms of profitability, WHK's ROE is -0.22%, compared to MARPS's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, WHK is more volatile compared to MARPS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHK.Check MARPS's competition here
Robin Energy Ltd. (NASDAQ: RBNE)
WHK vs RBNE Comparison September 2026
WhiteHawk Minerals Corp (NYSE: WHK) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHK stands at 606.6M. In comparison, RBNE has a market cap of 418.9K. Regarding current trading prices, WHK is priced at $26.32 on the NYSE, while RBNE trades at $2.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHK currently has a P/E ratio of -8.91, whereas RBNE's P/E ratio is 0.34. In terms of profitability, WHK's ROE is -0.22%, compared to RBNE's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WHK is less volatile compared to RBNE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHK.Check RBNE's competition here
Brooge Energy Limited (NASDAQ: BROGW)
WHK vs BROGW Comparison September 2026
WhiteHawk Minerals Corp (NYSE: WHK) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHK stands at 606.6M. In comparison, BROGW has a market cap of 61.5K. Regarding current trading prices, WHK is priced at $26.32 on the NYSE, while BROGW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHK currently has a P/E ratio of -8.91, whereas BROGW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WHK's ROE is -0.22%, compared to BROGW's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WHK is less volatile compared to BROGW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHK.Check BROGW's competition here
PBF Logistics LP (NYSE: PBFX)
WHK vs PBFX Comparison September 2026
WhiteHawk Minerals Corp (NYSE: WHK) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHK stands at 606.6M. In comparison, PBFX has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WHK is priced at $26.32 on the NYSE, while PBFX trades at $19.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHK currently has a P/E ratio of -8.91, whereas PBFX's P/E ratio is 8.22. In terms of profitability, WHK's ROE is -0.22%, compared to PBFX's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, WHK is less volatile compared to PBFX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHK.Check PBFX's competition here
Valero Energy Partners LP (NYSE: VLP)
WHK vs VLP Comparison September 2026
WhiteHawk Minerals Corp (NYSE: WHK) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHK stands at 606.6M. In comparison, VLP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WHK is priced at $26.32 on the NYSE, while VLP trades at $42.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHK currently has a P/E ratio of -8.91, whereas VLP's P/E ratio is 45.91. In terms of profitability, WHK's ROE is -0.22%, compared to VLP's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WHK is more volatile compared to VLP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHK.Check VLP's competition here
Midcoast Energy Partners, L.P. (NYSE: MEP)
WHK vs MEP Comparison September 2026
WhiteHawk Minerals Corp (NYSE: WHK) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHK stands at 606.6M. In comparison, MEP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WHK is priced at $26.32 on the NYSE, while MEP trades at $68.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHK currently has a P/E ratio of -8.91, whereas MEP's P/E ratio is -19.65. In terms of profitability, WHK's ROE is -0.22%, compared to MEP's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WHK is more volatile compared to MEP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHK.Check MEP's competition here
Blueknight Energy Partners, L.P. (NASDAQ: BKEPP)
WHK vs BKEPP Comparison September 2026
WhiteHawk Minerals Corp (NYSE: WHK) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHK stands at 606.6M. In comparison, BKEPP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WHK is priced at $26.32 on the NYSE, while BKEPP trades at $8.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHK currently has a P/E ratio of -8.91, whereas BKEPP's P/E ratio is 35.22. In terms of profitability, WHK's ROE is -0.22%, compared to BKEPP's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WHK is more volatile compared to BKEPP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHK.Check BKEPP's competition here
EnLink Midstream Partners, LP (NYSE: ENLK)
WHK vs ENLK Comparison September 2026
WhiteHawk Minerals Corp (NYSE: WHK) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHK stands at 606.6M. In comparison, ENLK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WHK is priced at $26.32 on the NYSE, while ENLK trades at $12.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHK currently has a P/E ratio of -8.91, whereas ENLK's P/E ratio is -25.64. In terms of profitability, WHK's ROE is -0.22%, compared to ENLK's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WHK is more volatile compared to ENLK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHK.Check ENLK's competition here
Enable Midstream Partners, LP (NYSE: ENBL)
WHK vs ENBL Comparison September 2026
WhiteHawk Minerals Corp (NYSE: WHK) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHK stands at 606.6M. In comparison, ENBL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WHK is priced at $26.32 on the NYSE, while ENBL trades at $7.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHK currently has a P/E ratio of -8.91, whereas ENBL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WHK's ROE is -0.22%, compared to ENBL's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WHK is more volatile compared to ENBL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHK.Check ENBL's competition here
Oasis Midstream Partners LP (NASDAQ: OMP)
WHK vs OMP Comparison September 2026
WhiteHawk Minerals Corp (NYSE: WHK) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHK stands at 606.6M. In comparison, OMP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WHK is priced at $26.32 on the NYSE, while OMP trades at $23.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHK currently has a P/E ratio of -8.91, whereas OMP's P/E ratio is 8.10. In terms of profitability, WHK's ROE is -0.22%, compared to OMP's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WHK is less volatile compared to OMP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHK.Check OMP's competition here
BP Midstream Partners LP (NYSE: BPMP)
WHK vs BPMP Comparison September 2026
WhiteHawk Minerals Corp (NYSE: WHK) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHK stands at 606.6M. In comparison, BPMP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WHK is priced at $26.32 on the NYSE, while BPMP trades at $17.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHK currently has a P/E ratio of -8.91, whereas BPMP's P/E ratio is 12.26. In terms of profitability, WHK's ROE is -0.22%, compared to BPMP's ROE of +1.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WHK is more volatile compared to BPMP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHK.Check BPMP's competition here
Blueknight Energy Partners, L.P. (NASDAQ: BKEP)
WHK vs BKEP Comparison September 2026
WhiteHawk Minerals Corp (NYSE: WHK) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHK stands at 606.6M. In comparison, BKEP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WHK is priced at $26.32 on the NYSE, while BKEP trades at $4.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHK currently has a P/E ratio of -8.91, whereas BKEP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WHK's ROE is -0.22%, compared to BKEP's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WHK is more volatile compared to BKEP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHK.Check BKEP's competition here