Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See ET's competitors and their performance on the NYSE and across the wider stock market.
Peer Comparison Table: Oil & Gas Midstream Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more for ET and its NYSE peers.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ET | $21.31 | -0.33% | 73.3B | 14.50 | $1.47 | +6.32% |
| ET-PE | $81.43 | +4.82% | 170.2B | 75.82 | $1.07 | +6.32% |
| ENB | $50.20 | +0.52% | 109.6B | 23.46 | $2.14 | +5.57% |
| WMB | $73.73 | -0.62% | 90.2B | 32.47 | $2.27 | +2.79% |
| EPD | $39.02 | -0.08% | 84.4B | 13.55 | $2.88 | +5.67% |
| ET-PI | $11.48 | +0.31% | 71.2B | 7.74 | $1.48 | +6.32% |
| KMI | $31.56 | -1.44% | 70.2B | 20.60 | $1.53 | +3.75% |
| TRP | $61.86 | -0.31% | 64.4B | 24.06 | $2.57 | +4.02% |
| TRGP | $287.82 | -0.39% | 61.8B | 27.51 | $10.46 | +1.56% |
| MPLX | $59.25 | -0.44% | 60.2B | 12.75 | $4.65 | +7.26% |
Stock Comparison
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET-PE)
ET vs ET-PE Comparison September 2026
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 73.3B. In comparison, ET-PE has a market cap of 170.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $21.31 on the NYSE, while ET-PE trades at $81.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 14.50, whereas ET-PE's P/E ratio is 75.82. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ET-PE's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to ET-PE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.Check ET-PE's competition here
Enbridge Inc. (NYSE: ENB)
ET vs ENB Comparison September 2026
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 73.3B. In comparison, ENB has a market cap of 109.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $21.31 on the NYSE, while ENB trades at $50.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 14.50, whereas ENB's P/E ratio is 23.46. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ENB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to ENB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.Check ENB's competition here
The Williams Companies, Inc. (NYSE: WMB)
ET vs WMB Comparison September 2026
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 73.3B. In comparison, WMB has a market cap of 90.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $21.31 on the NYSE, while WMB trades at $73.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 14.50, whereas WMB's P/E ratio is 32.47. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.17%, compared to WMB's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to WMB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.Check WMB's competition here
Enterprise Products Partners L.P. (NYSE: EPD)
ET vs EPD Comparison September 2026
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 73.3B. In comparison, EPD has a market cap of 84.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $21.31 on the NYSE, while EPD trades at $39.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 14.50, whereas EPD's P/E ratio is 13.55. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.17%, compared to EPD's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to EPD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.Check EPD's competition here
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET-PI)
ET vs ET-PI Comparison September 2026
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 73.3B. In comparison, ET-PI has a market cap of 71.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $21.31 on the NYSE, while ET-PI trades at $11.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 14.50, whereas ET-PI's P/E ratio is 7.74. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ET-PI's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to ET-PI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.Check ET-PI's competition here
Kinder Morgan, Inc. (NYSE: KMI)
ET vs KMI Comparison September 2026
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 73.3B. In comparison, KMI has a market cap of 70.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $21.31 on the NYSE, while KMI trades at $31.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 14.50, whereas KMI's P/E ratio is 20.60. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.17%, compared to KMI's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to KMI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.Check KMI's competition here
TC Energy Corporation (NYSE: TRP)
ET vs TRP Comparison September 2026
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 73.3B. In comparison, TRP has a market cap of 64.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $21.31 on the NYSE, while TRP trades at $61.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 14.50, whereas TRP's P/E ratio is 24.06. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TRP's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to TRP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.Check TRP's competition here
Targa Resources Corp. (NYSE: TRGP)
ET vs TRGP Comparison September 2026
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 73.3B. In comparison, TRGP has a market cap of 61.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $21.31 on the NYSE, while TRGP trades at $287.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 14.50, whereas TRGP's P/E ratio is 27.51. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TRGP's ROE of +0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to TRGP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.Check TRGP's competition here
MPLX Lp (NYSE: MPLX)
ET vs MPLX Comparison September 2026
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 73.3B. In comparison, MPLX has a market cap of 60.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $21.31 on the NYSE, while MPLX trades at $59.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 14.50, whereas MPLX's P/E ratio is 12.75. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MPLX's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to MPLX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.Check MPLX's competition here
ONEOK, Inc. (NYSE: OKE)
ET vs OKE Comparison September 2026
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 73.3B. In comparison, OKE has a market cap of 59.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $21.31 on the NYSE, while OKE trades at $94.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 14.50, whereas OKE's P/E ratio is 16.34. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.17%, compared to OKE's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to OKE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.Check OKE's competition here
Cheniere Energy, Inc. (NYSE: LNG)
ET vs LNG Comparison September 2026
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 73.3B. In comparison, LNG has a market cap of 59.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $21.31 on the NYSE, while LNG trades at $282.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 14.50, whereas LNG's P/E ratio is 154.27. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.17%, compared to LNG's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to LNG. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.Check LNG's competition here
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET-PD)
ET vs ET-PD Comparison September 2026
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 73.3B. In comparison, ET-PD has a market cap of 50.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $21.31 on the NYSE, while ET-PD trades at $25.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 14.50, whereas ET-PD's P/E ratio is 23.81. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ET-PD's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to ET-PD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.Check ET-PD's competition here
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET-PC)
ET vs ET-PC Comparison September 2026
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 73.3B. In comparison, ET-PC has a market cap of 50.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $21.31 on the NYSE, while ET-PC trades at $25.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 14.50, whereas ET-PC's P/E ratio is 23.81. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ET-PC's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to ET-PC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.Check ET-PC's competition here
Enbridge Inc. 6.375 SNT18 B 78 (NYSE: ENBA)
ET vs ENBA Comparison September 2026
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 73.3B. In comparison, ENBA has a market cap of 41.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $21.31 on the NYSE, while ENBA trades at $25.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 14.50, whereas ENBA's P/E ratio is 24.08. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ENBA's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to ENBA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.Check ENBA's competition here
Venture Global, Inc. (NYSE: VG)
ET vs VG Comparison September 2026
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 73.3B. In comparison, VG has a market cap of 34.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $21.31 on the NYSE, while VG trades at $14.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 14.50, whereas VG's P/E ratio is 11.17. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.17%, compared to VG's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to VG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.Check VG's competition here
MPLX Lp (NYSE: MPLXP)
ET vs MPLXP Comparison September 2026
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 73.3B. In comparison, MPLXP has a market cap of 33.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $21.31 on the NYSE, while MPLXP trades at $33.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 14.50, whereas MPLXP's P/E ratio is 11.29. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MPLXP's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to MPLXP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.Check MPLXP's competition here
Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. (NYSE: CQP)
ET vs CQP Comparison September 2026
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 73.3B. In comparison, CQP has a market cap of 33.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $21.31 on the NYSE, while CQP trades at $68.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 14.50, whereas CQP's P/E ratio is 12.04. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CQP's ROE of +1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to CQP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.Check CQP's competition here
Pembina Pipeline Corporation (NYSE: PBA)
ET vs PBA Comparison September 2026
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 73.3B. In comparison, PBA has a market cap of 27.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $21.31 on the NYSE, while PBA trades at $48.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 14.50, whereas PBA's P/E ratio is 24.87. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PBA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to PBA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.Check PBA's competition here
TransCanada PipeLines Limited 6 (NYSE: TCPA)
ET vs TCPA Comparison September 2026
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 73.3B. In comparison, TCPA has a market cap of 22.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $21.31 on the NYSE, while TCPA trades at $21.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 14.50, whereas TCPA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TCPA's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to TCPA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.Check TCPA's competition here
Western Midstream Partners, LP (NYSE: WES)
ET vs WES Comparison September 2026
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 73.3B. In comparison, WES has a market cap of 19.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $21.31 on the NYSE, while WES trades at $48.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 14.50, whereas WES's P/E ratio is 15.18. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.17%, compared to WES's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to WES. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.Check WES's competition here
Plains All American Pipeline, L.P. (NASDAQ: PAA)
ET vs PAA Comparison September 2026
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 73.3B. In comparison, PAA has a market cap of 18B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $21.31 on the NYSE, while PAA trades at $25.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 14.50, whereas PAA's P/E ratio is 16.55. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PAA's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to PAA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.Check PAA's competition here
Viper Energy, Inc. (NASDAQ: VNOM)
ET vs VNOM Comparison September 2026
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 73.3B. In comparison, VNOM has a market cap of 15.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $21.31 on the NYSE, while VNOM trades at $44.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 14.50, whereas VNOM's P/E ratio is 21.87. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.17%, compared to VNOM's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to VNOM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.Check VNOM's competition here
Magellan Midstream Partners, L.P. (NYSE: MMP)
ET vs MMP Comparison September 2026
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 73.3B. In comparison, MMP has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $21.31 on the NYSE, while MMP trades at $69.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 14.50, whereas MMP's P/E ratio is 13.80. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MMP's ROE of -8.33%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to MMP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.Check MMP's competition here
DT Midstream, Inc. (NYSE: DTM)
ET vs DTM Comparison September 2026
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 73.3B. In comparison, DTM has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $21.31 on the NYSE, while DTM trades at $129.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 14.50, whereas DTM's P/E ratio is 28.66. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DTM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to DTM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.Check DTM's competition here
Antero Midstream Corporation (NYSE: AM)
ET vs AM Comparison September 2026
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 73.3B. In comparison, AM has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $21.31 on the NYSE, while AM trades at $22.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 14.50, whereas AM's P/E ratio is 25.92. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AM's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to AM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.Check AM's competition here
DCP Midstream, LP (NYSE: DCP)
ET vs DCP Comparison September 2026
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 73.3B. In comparison, DCP has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $21.31 on the NYSE, while DCP trades at $41.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 14.50, whereas DCP's P/E ratio is 7.75. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DCP's ROE of -351.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to DCP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.Check DCP's competition here
Hess Midstream LP (NYSE: HESM)
ET vs HESM Comparison September 2026
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 73.3B. In comparison, HESM has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $21.31 on the NYSE, while HESM trades at $39.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 14.50, whereas HESM's P/E ratio is 13.65. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HESM's ROE of +0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to HESM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.Check HESM's competition here
South Bow Corporation (NYSE: SOBO)
ET vs SOBO Comparison September 2026
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 73.3B. In comparison, SOBO has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $21.31 on the NYSE, while SOBO trades at $37.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 14.50, whereas SOBO's P/E ratio is 18.53. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SOBO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to SOBO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.Check SOBO's competition here
DCP Midstream, LP (NYSE: DCP-PC)
ET vs DCP-PC Comparison September 2026
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 73.3B. In comparison, DCP-PC has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $21.31 on the NYSE, while DCP-PC trades at $25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 14.50, whereas DCP-PC's P/E ratio is 57.73. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DCP-PC's ROE of -351.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to DCP-PC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.Check DCP-PC's competition here
EnLink Midstream, LLC (NYSE: ENLC)
ET vs ENLC Comparison September 2026
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 73.3B. In comparison, ENLC has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $21.31 on the NYSE, while ENLC trades at $14.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 14.50, whereas ENLC's P/E ratio is 64.18. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ENLC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to ENLC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.Check ENLC's competition here
Plains GP Holdings LP (NASDAQ: PAGP)
ET vs PAGP Comparison September 2026
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 73.3B. In comparison, PAGP has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $21.31 on the NYSE, while PAGP trades at $27.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 14.50, whereas PAGP's P/E ratio is 44.40. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PAGP's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to PAGP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.Check PAGP's competition here
Equitrans Midstream Corporation (NYSE: ETRN)
ET vs ETRN Comparison September 2026
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 73.3B. In comparison, ETRN has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $21.31 on the NYSE, while ETRN trades at $12.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 14.50, whereas ETRN's P/E ratio is 13.80. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ETRN's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to ETRN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.Check ETRN's competition here
Golar LNG Limited (NASDAQ: GLNG)
ET vs GLNG Comparison September 2026
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 73.3B. In comparison, GLNG has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $21.31 on the NYSE, while GLNG trades at $50.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 14.50, whereas GLNG's P/E ratio is 33.98. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GLNG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to GLNG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.Check GLNG's competition here
Excelerate Energy, Inc. (NYSE: EE)
ET vs EE Comparison September 2026
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 73.3B. In comparison, EE has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $21.31 on the NYSE, while EE trades at $38.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 14.50, whereas EE's P/E ratio is 26.05. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.17%, compared to EE's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to EE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.Check EE's competition here
Transportadora de Gas del Sur S.A. (NYSE: TGS)
ET vs TGS Comparison September 2026
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 73.3B. In comparison, TGS has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $21.31 on the NYSE, while TGS trades at $28.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 14.50, whereas TGS's P/E ratio is 10.96. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TGS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to TGS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.Check TGS's competition here
Kinetik Holdings Inc. (NYSE: KNTK)
ET vs KNTK Comparison September 2026
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 73.3B. In comparison, KNTK has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $21.31 on the NYSE, while KNTK trades at $53.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 14.50, whereas KNTK's P/E ratio is 19.50. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.17%, compared to KNTK's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to KNTK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.Check KNTK's competition here
SunocoCorp LLC (NYSE: SUNC)
ET vs SUNC Comparison September 2026
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 73.3B. In comparison, SUNC has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $21.31 on the NYSE, while SUNC trades at $76.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 14.50, whereas SUNC's P/E ratio is 17.64. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SUNC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to SUNC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.Check SUNC's competition here
Euronav N.V. (NYSE: EURN)
ET vs EURN Comparison September 2026
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 73.3B. In comparison, EURN has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $21.31 on the NYSE, while EURN trades at $16.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 14.50, whereas EURN's P/E ratio is 2.87. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.17%, compared to EURN's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to EURN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.Check EURN's competition here
Crestwood Equity Partners LP (NYSE: CEQP)
ET vs CEQP Comparison September 2026
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 73.3B. In comparison, CEQP has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $21.31 on the NYSE, while CEQP trades at $28.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 14.50, whereas CEQP's P/E ratio is 21.91. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CEQP's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to CEQP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.Check CEQP's competition here
Delek Logistics Partners, LP (NYSE: DKL)
ET vs DKL Comparison September 2026
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 73.3B. In comparison, DKL has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $21.31 on the NYSE, while DKL trades at $54.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 14.50, whereas DKL's P/E ratio is 19.21. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DKL's ROE of -9.36%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to DKL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.Check DKL's competition here
NuStar Energy L.P. (NYSE: NS)
ET vs NS Comparison September 2026
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 73.3B. In comparison, NS has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $21.31 on the NYSE, while NS trades at $21.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 14.50, whereas NS's P/E ratio is 84.46. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.Check NS's competition here
NuStar Energy L.P. (NYSE: NS-PA)
ET vs NS-PA Comparison September 2026
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 73.3B. In comparison, NS-PA has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $21.31 on the NYSE, while NS-PA trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 14.50, whereas NS-PA's P/E ratio is -8.66. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NS-PA's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to NS-PA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.Check NS-PA's competition here
NuStar Energy L.P. (NYSE: NS-PB)
ET vs NS-PB Comparison September 2026
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 73.3B. In comparison, NS-PB has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $21.31 on the NYSE, while NS-PB trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 14.50, whereas NS-PB's P/E ratio is -19.83. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NS-PB's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to NS-PB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.Check NS-PB's competition here
Holly Energy Partners, L.P. (NYSE: HEP)
ET vs HEP Comparison September 2026
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 73.3B. In comparison, HEP has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $21.31 on the NYSE, while HEP trades at $20.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 14.50, whereas HEP's P/E ratio is 10.76. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HEP's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to HEP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.Check HEP's competition here
Seapeak LLC (NYSE: SEAL-PB)
ET vs SEAL-PB Comparison September 2026
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 73.3B. In comparison, SEAL-PB has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $21.31 on the NYSE, while SEAL-PB trades at $25.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 14.50, whereas SEAL-PB's P/E ratio is 41.53. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SEAL-PB's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to SEAL-PB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.Check SEAL-PB's competition here
Seapeak LLC (NYSE: SEAL-PA)
ET vs SEAL-PA Comparison September 2026
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 73.3B. In comparison, SEAL-PA has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $21.31 on the NYSE, while SEAL-PA trades at $25.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 14.50, whereas SEAL-PA's P/E ratio is 52.55. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SEAL-PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to SEAL-PA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.Check SEAL-PA's competition here
NuStar Energy L.P. 9.00% CUM PFD C (NYSE: NS-PC)
ET vs NS-PC Comparison September 2026
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 73.3B. In comparison, NS-PC has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $21.31 on the NYSE, while NS-PC trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 14.50, whereas NS-PC's P/E ratio is 20.10. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NS-PC's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to NS-PC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.Check NS-PC's competition here
NGL Energy Partners LP (NYSE: NGL)
ET vs NGL Comparison September 2026
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 73.3B. In comparison, NGL has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $21.31 on the NYSE, while NGL trades at $18.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 14.50, whereas NGL's P/E ratio is -6.35. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NGL's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to NGL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.Check NGL's competition here
Rattler Midstream LP (NASDAQ: RTLR)
ET vs RTLR Comparison September 2026
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 73.3B. In comparison, RTLR has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $21.31 on the NYSE, while RTLR trades at $15.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 14.50, whereas RTLR's P/E ratio is 16.37. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.17%, compared to RTLR's ROE of -3260.98%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to RTLR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.Check RTLR's competition here
Dorian LPG Ltd. (NYSE: LPG)
ET vs LPG Comparison September 2026
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 73.3B. In comparison, LPG has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $21.31 on the NYSE, while LPG trades at $49.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 14.50, whereas LPG's P/E ratio is 7.28. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.17%, compared to LPG's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to LPG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.Check LPG's competition here
NGL Energy Partners LP (NYSE: NGL-PB)
ET vs NGL-PB Comparison September 2026
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 73.3B. In comparison, NGL-PB has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $21.31 on the NYSE, while NGL-PB trades at $25.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 14.50, whereas NGL-PB's P/E ratio is -9.87. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NGL-PB's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to NGL-PB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.Check NGL-PB's competition here
NGL Energy Partners LP (NYSE: NGL-PC)
ET vs NGL-PC Comparison September 2026
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 73.3B. In comparison, NGL-PC has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $21.31 on the NYSE, while NGL-PC trades at $25.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 14.50, whereas NGL-PC's P/E ratio is -9.84. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NGL-PC's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to NGL-PC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.Check NGL-PC's competition here
NuStar Logistics, L.P. SB NT FX/FL 43 (NYSE: NSS)
ET vs NSS Comparison September 2026
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 73.3B. In comparison, NSS has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $21.31 on the NYSE, while NSS trades at $25.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 14.50, whereas NSS's P/E ratio is -508.80. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NSS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to NSS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.Check NSS's competition here
Genesis Energy, L.P. (NYSE: GEL)
ET vs GEL Comparison September 2026
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 73.3B. In comparison, GEL has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $21.31 on the NYSE, while GEL trades at $16.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 14.50, whereas GEL's P/E ratio is 84.74. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GEL's ROE of +1.41%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to GEL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.Check GEL's competition here
Global Partners LP (NYSE: GLP)
ET vs GLP Comparison September 2026
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 73.3B. In comparison, GLP has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $21.31 on the NYSE, while GLP trades at $50.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 14.50, whereas GLP's P/E ratio is 10.26. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GLP's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to GLP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.Check GLP's competition here
Permian Basin Royalty Trust (NYSE: PBT)
ET vs PBT Comparison September 2026
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 73.3B. In comparison, PBT has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $21.31 on the NYSE, while PBT trades at $33.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 14.50, whereas PBT's P/E ratio is 96.74. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PBT's ROE of +99.89%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to PBT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.Check PBT's competition here
GasLog Ltd. (NYSE: GLOG-PA)
ET vs GLOG-PA Comparison September 2026
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 73.3B. In comparison, GLOG-PA has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $21.31 on the NYSE, while GLOG-PA trades at $25.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 14.50, whereas GLOG-PA's P/E ratio is 44.93. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GLOG-PA's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to GLOG-PA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.Check GLOG-PA's competition here
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN)
ET vs TEN Comparison September 2026
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 73.3B. In comparison, TEN has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $21.31 on the NYSE, while TEN trades at $42.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 14.50, whereas TEN's P/E ratio is 6.93. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TEN's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to TEN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.Check TEN's competition here
Teekay Corporation (NYSE: TK)
ET vs TK Comparison September 2026
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 73.3B. In comparison, TK has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $21.31 on the NYSE, while TK trades at $13.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 14.50, whereas TK's P/E ratio is 6.27. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TK's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to TK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.Check TK's competition here
Sabine Royalty Trust (NYSE: SBR)
ET vs SBR Comparison September 2026
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 73.3B. In comparison, SBR has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $21.31 on the NYSE, while SBR trades at $74.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 14.50, whereas SBR's P/E ratio is 15.99. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SBR's ROE of +9.62%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to SBR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.Check SBR's competition here
Global Partners LP (NYSE: GLP-PA)
ET vs GLP-PA Comparison September 2026
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 73.3B. In comparison, GLP-PA has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $21.31 on the NYSE, while GLP-PA trades at $43.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 14.50, whereas GLP-PA's P/E ratio is 21.49. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GLP-PA's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to GLP-PA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.Check GLP-PA's competition here
Crestwood Equity Partners LP (NYSE: CEQP-P)
ET vs CEQP-P Comparison September 2026
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 73.3B. In comparison, CEQP-P has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $21.31 on the NYSE, while CEQP-P trades at $9.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 14.50, whereas CEQP-P's P/E ratio is -12.22. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CEQP-P's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to CEQP-P. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.Check CEQP-P's competition here
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TNP-PE)
ET vs TNP-PE Comparison September 2026
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 73.3B. In comparison, TNP-PE has a market cap of 991.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $21.31 on the NYSE, while TNP-PE trades at $78.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 14.50, whereas TNP-PE's P/E ratio is -8.23. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TNP-PE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to TNP-PE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.Check TNP-PE's competition here
Global Partners LP (NYSE: GLP-PB)
ET vs GLP-PB Comparison September 2026
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 73.3B. In comparison, GLP-PB has a market cap of 863M. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $21.31 on the NYSE, while GLP-PB trades at $25.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 14.50, whereas GLP-PB's P/E ratio is 7.08. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GLP-PB's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to GLP-PB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.Check GLP-PB's competition here
WhiteHawk Minerals Corp (NYSE: WHK)
ET vs WHK Comparison September 2026
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 73.3B. In comparison, WHK has a market cap of 607.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $21.31 on the NYSE, while WHK trades at $26.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 14.50, whereas WHK's P/E ratio is -176.23. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.17%, compared to WHK's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to WHK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.Check WHK's competition here
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TNP)
ET vs TNP Comparison September 2026
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 73.3B. In comparison, TNP has a market cap of 539.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $21.31 on the NYSE, while TNP trades at $18.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 14.50, whereas TNP's P/E ratio is 3.69. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TNP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to TNP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.Check TNP's competition here
Summit Midstream Corp. (NYSE: SMC)
ET vs SMC Comparison September 2026
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 73.3B. In comparison, SMC has a market cap of 470.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $21.31 on the NYSE, while SMC trades at $34.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 14.50, whereas SMC's P/E ratio is -30.70. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SMC's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to SMC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.Check SMC's competition here
GasLog Partners LP (NYSE: GLOP-PB)
ET vs GLOP-PB Comparison September 2026
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 73.3B. In comparison, GLOP-PB has a market cap of 417.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $21.31 on the NYSE, while GLOP-PB trades at $26.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 14.50, whereas GLOP-PB's P/E ratio is 13.57. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GLOP-PB's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to GLOP-PB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.Check GLOP-PB's competition here
GasLog Partners LP (NYSE: GLOP-PC)
ET vs GLOP-PC Comparison September 2026
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 73.3B. In comparison, GLOP-PC has a market cap of 413.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $21.31 on the NYSE, while GLOP-PC trades at $25.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 14.50, whereas GLOP-PC's P/E ratio is 37.38. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GLOP-PC's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to GLOP-PC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.Check GLOP-PC's competition here
GasLog Partners LP (NYSE: GLOP-PA)
ET vs GLOP-PA Comparison September 2026
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 73.3B. In comparison, GLOP-PA has a market cap of 410.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $21.31 on the NYSE, while GLOP-PA trades at $25.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 14.50, whereas GLOP-PA's P/E ratio is 37.10. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GLOP-PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to GLOP-PA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.Check GLOP-PA's competition here
Summit Midstream Partners, LP (NYSE: SMLP)
ET vs SMLP Comparison September 2026
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 73.3B. In comparison, SMLP has a market cap of 405.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $21.31 on the NYSE, while SMLP trades at $38.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 14.50, whereas SMLP's P/E ratio is 5.30. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SMLP's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to SMLP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.Check SMLP's competition here
Diamond S Shipping Inc. (NYSE: DSSI)
ET vs DSSI Comparison September 2026
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 73.3B. In comparison, DSSI has a market cap of 384.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $21.31 on the NYSE, while DSSI trades at $9.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 14.50, whereas DSSI's P/E ratio is -6.99. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DSSI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to DSSI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.Check DSSI's competition here
Evolve Transition Infrastructure LP (AMEX: SNMP)
ET vs SNMP Comparison September 2026
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 73.3B. In comparison, SNMP has a market cap of 338.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $21.31 on the NYSE, while SNMP trades at $1.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 14.50, whereas SNMP's P/E ratio is -3.91. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SNMP's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to SNMP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.Check SNMP's competition here
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TNP-PF)
ET vs TNP-PF Comparison September 2026
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 73.3B. In comparison, TNP-PF has a market cap of 334.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $21.31 on the NYSE, while TNP-PF trades at $27.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 14.50, whereas TNP-PF's P/E ratio is -2.84. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TNP-PF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to TNP-PF. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.Check TNP-PF's competition here
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TNP-PD)
ET vs TNP-PD Comparison September 2026
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 73.3B. In comparison, TNP-PD has a market cap of 321.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $21.31 on the NYSE, while TNP-PD trades at $25.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 14.50, whereas TNP-PD's P/E ratio is -2.65. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TNP-PD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to TNP-PD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.Check TNP-PD's competition here
Green Plains Partners LP (NASDAQ: GPP)
ET vs GPP Comparison September 2026
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 73.3B. In comparison, GPP has a market cap of 286.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $21.31 on the NYSE, while GPP trades at $12.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 14.50, whereas GPP's P/E ratio is 7.60. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GPP's ROE of +26.63%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to GPP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.Check GPP's competition here
GasLog Partners LP (NYSE: GLOP)
ET vs GLOP Comparison September 2026
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 73.3B. In comparison, GLOP has a market cap of 277.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $21.31 on the NYSE, while GLOP trades at $5.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 14.50, whereas GLOP's P/E ratio is 3.07. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GLOP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to GLOP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.Check GLOP's competition here
Brooge Energy Limited (NASDAQ: BROG)
ET vs BROG Comparison September 2026
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 73.3B. In comparison, BROG has a market cap of 232.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $21.31 on the NYSE, while BROG trades at $2.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 14.50, whereas BROG's P/E ratio is 52.00. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BROG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to BROG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.Check BROG's competition here
Imperial Petroleum Inc. (NASDAQ: IMPP)
ET vs IMPP Comparison September 2026
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 73.3B. In comparison, IMPP has a market cap of 195.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $21.31 on the NYSE, while IMPP trades at $5.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 14.50, whereas IMPP's P/E ratio is 3.15. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.17%, compared to IMPP's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to IMPP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.Check IMPP's competition here
Imperial Petroleum Inc. (NASDAQ: IMPPP)
ET vs IMPPP Comparison September 2026
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 73.3B. In comparison, IMPPP has a market cap of 180.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $21.31 on the NYSE, while IMPPP trades at $25.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 14.50, whereas IMPPP's P/E ratio is 15.14. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.17%, compared to IMPPP's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to IMPPP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.Check IMPPP's competition here
Martin Midstream Partners L.P. (NASDAQ: MMLP)
ET vs MMLP Comparison September 2026
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 73.3B. In comparison, MMLP has a market cap of 88M. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $21.31 on the NYSE, while MMLP trades at $2.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 14.50, whereas MMLP's P/E ratio is -5.92. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MMLP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to MMLP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.Check MMLP's competition here
New Fortress Energy Inc. (NASDAQ: NFE)
ET vs NFE Comparison September 2026
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 73.3B. In comparison, NFE has a market cap of 83.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $21.31 on the NYSE, while NFE trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 14.50, whereas NFE's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NFE's ROE of -17.38%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to NFE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.Check NFE's competition here
Dynagas LNG Partners LP (NYSE: DLNG-PB)
ET vs DLNG-PB Comparison September 2026
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 73.3B. In comparison, DLNG-PB has a market cap of 83.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $21.31 on the NYSE, while DLNG-PB trades at $25.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 14.50, whereas DLNG-PB's P/E ratio is 22.51. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DLNG-PB's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to DLNG-PB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.Check DLNG-PB's competition here
CBL International Limited (NASDAQ: BANL)
ET vs BANL Comparison September 2026
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 73.3B. In comparison, BANL has a market cap of 34.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $21.31 on the NYSE, while BANL trades at $16.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 14.50, whereas BANL's P/E ratio is -930.64. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BANL's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to BANL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.Check BANL's competition here
TMD Energy Limited (AMEX: TMDE)
ET vs TMDE Comparison September 2026
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 73.3B. In comparison, TMDE has a market cap of 16.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $21.31 on the NYSE, while TMDE trades at $0.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 14.50, whereas TMDE's P/E ratio is 8.87. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TMDE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to TMDE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.Check TMDE's competition here
Robin Energy Ltd. Common Stock When Issued (NASDAQ: RBNEV)
ET vs RBNEV Comparison September 2026
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 73.3B. In comparison, RBNEV has a market cap of 13.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $21.31 on the NYSE, while RBNEV trades at $5.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 14.50, whereas RBNEV's P/E ratio is -18.13. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.17%, compared to RBNEV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to RBNEV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.Check RBNEV's competition here
Marine Petroleum Trust (NASDAQ: MARPS)
ET vs MARPS Comparison September 2026
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 73.3B. In comparison, MARPS has a market cap of 8.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $21.31 on the NYSE, while MARPS trades at $4.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 14.50, whereas MARPS's P/E ratio is 13.91. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MARPS's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to MARPS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.Check MARPS's competition here
Robin Energy Ltd. (NASDAQ: RBNE)
ET vs RBNE Comparison September 2026
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 73.3B. In comparison, RBNE has a market cap of 457.3K. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $21.31 on the NYSE, while RBNE trades at $2.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 14.50, whereas RBNE's P/E ratio is 0.37. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.17%, compared to RBNE's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to RBNE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.Check RBNE's competition here
Brooge Energy Limited (NASDAQ: BROGW)
ET vs BROGW Comparison September 2026
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 73.3B. In comparison, BROGW has a market cap of 61.5K. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $21.31 on the NYSE, while BROGW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 14.50, whereas BROGW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BROGW's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to BROGW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.Check BROGW's competition here
Enbridge Energy Management, L.L.C. (NYSE: EEQ)
ET vs EEQ Comparison September 2026
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 73.3B. In comparison, EEQ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $21.31 on the NYSE, while EEQ trades at $10.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 14.50, whereas EEQ's P/E ratio is -38.89. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.17%, compared to EEQ's ROE of -32.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to EEQ. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.Check EEQ's competition here
Valero Energy Partners LP (NYSE: VLP)
ET vs VLP Comparison September 2026
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 73.3B. In comparison, VLP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $21.31 on the NYSE, while VLP trades at $42.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 14.50, whereas VLP's P/E ratio is 45.91. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.17%, compared to VLP's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to VLP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.Check VLP's competition here
PBF Logistics LP (NYSE: PBFX)
ET vs PBFX Comparison September 2026
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 73.3B. In comparison, PBFX has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $21.31 on the NYSE, while PBFX trades at $19.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 14.50, whereas PBFX's P/E ratio is 8.22. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PBFX's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to PBFX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.Check PBFX's competition here
Blueknight Energy Partners, L.P. (NASDAQ: BKEPP)
ET vs BKEPP Comparison September 2026
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 73.3B. In comparison, BKEPP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $21.31 on the NYSE, while BKEPP trades at $8.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 14.50, whereas BKEPP's P/E ratio is 35.22. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BKEPP's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to BKEPP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.Check BKEPP's competition here
EnLink Midstream Partners, LP (NYSE: ENLK)
ET vs ENLK Comparison September 2026
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 73.3B. In comparison, ENLK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $21.31 on the NYSE, while ENLK trades at $12.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 14.50, whereas ENLK's P/E ratio is -25.64. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ENLK's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to ENLK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.Check ENLK's competition here
EQGP Holdings, LP (NYSE: EQGP)
ET vs EQGP Comparison September 2026
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 73.3B. In comparison, EQGP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $21.31 on the NYSE, while EQGP trades at $19.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 14.50, whereas EQGP's P/E ratio is 10.39. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.17%, compared to EQGP's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to EQGP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.Check EQGP's competition here
Midcoast Energy Partners, L.P. (NYSE: MEP)
ET vs MEP Comparison September 2026
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 73.3B. In comparison, MEP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $21.31 on the NYSE, while MEP trades at $68.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 14.50, whereas MEP's P/E ratio is -19.65. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MEP's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to MEP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.Check MEP's competition here
Shell Midstream Partners, L.P. (NYSE: SHLX)
ET vs SHLX Comparison September 2026
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 73.3B. In comparison, SHLX has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $21.31 on the NYSE, while SHLX trades at $15.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 14.50, whereas SHLX's P/E ratio is 13.07. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SHLX's ROE of -56.82%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to SHLX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.Check SHLX's competition here
Teekay LNG Partners L.P. (NYSE: TGP)
ET vs TGP Comparison September 2026
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 73.3B. In comparison, TGP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $21.31 on the NYSE, while TGP trades at N/A.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 14.50, whereas TGP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TGP's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to TGP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.Check TGP's competition here
Enable Midstream Partners, LP (NYSE: ENBL)
ET vs ENBL Comparison September 2026
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 73.3B. In comparison, ENBL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $21.31 on the NYSE, while ENBL trades at $7.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 14.50, whereas ENBL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ENBL's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to ENBL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.Check ENBL's competition here