Pembina Pipeline Corporation (PBA) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (PBA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Oil & Gas Midstream Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PBA | $46.70 | -1.06% | 27.1B | 24.19 | $1.93 | +4.43% |
| ET-PE | $81.43 | +4.82% | 170.2B | 75.82 | $1.07 | +7.03% |
| ENB | $55.40 | -1.49% | 121B | 25.88 | $2.14 | +4.99% |
| EP-PC | $50.56 | -0.24% | 112.3B | 28.47 | $1.78 | +4.67% |
| WMB | $75.06 | -3.67% | 91.8B | 33.65 | $2.23 | +2.73% |
| EPD | $36.66 | +0.25% | 79.3B | 13.57 | $2.70 | +6.01% |
| KMI | $32.27 | -2.77% | 71.8B | 22.42 | $1.44 | +3.63% |
| TRP | $68.50 | -1.65% | 71.4B | 26.66 | $2.57 | +3.63% |
| ET-PI | $11.48 | +0.09% | 66B | 9.32 | $1.23 | +7.03% |
| ET | $19.06 | -0.57% | 65.6B | 15.87 | $1.20 | +7.03% |
Stock Comparison
PBA vs ET-PE Comparison July 2026
PBA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBA stands at 27.1B. In comparison, ET-PE has a market cap of 170.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PBA is priced at $46.70, while ET-PE trades at $81.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBA currently has a P/E ratio of 24.19, whereas ET-PE's P/E ratio is 75.82. In terms of profitability, PBA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ET-PE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PBA is less volatile compared to ET-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBA.Check ET-PE's competition here
PBA vs ENB Comparison July 2026
PBA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBA stands at 27.1B. In comparison, ENB has a market cap of 121B. Regarding current trading prices, PBA is priced at $46.70, while ENB trades at $55.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBA currently has a P/E ratio of 24.19, whereas ENB's P/E ratio is 25.88. In terms of profitability, PBA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ENB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PBA is less volatile compared to ENB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBA.Check ENB's competition here
PBA vs EP-PC Comparison July 2026
PBA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBA stands at 27.1B. In comparison, EP-PC has a market cap of 112.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PBA is priced at $46.70, while EP-PC trades at $50.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBA currently has a P/E ratio of 24.19, whereas EP-PC's P/E ratio is 28.47. In terms of profitability, PBA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to EP-PC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PBA is more volatile compared to EP-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBA.Check EP-PC's competition here
PBA vs WMB Comparison July 2026
PBA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBA stands at 27.1B. In comparison, WMB has a market cap of 91.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PBA is priced at $46.70, while WMB trades at $75.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBA currently has a P/E ratio of 24.19, whereas WMB's P/E ratio is 33.65. In terms of profitability, PBA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to WMB's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, PBA is less volatile compared to WMB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBA.Check WMB's competition here
PBA vs EPD Comparison July 2026
PBA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBA stands at 27.1B. In comparison, EPD has a market cap of 79.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PBA is priced at $46.70, while EPD trades at $36.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBA currently has a P/E ratio of 24.19, whereas EPD's P/E ratio is 13.57. In terms of profitability, PBA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to EPD's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PBA is more volatile compared to EPD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBA.Check EPD's competition here
PBA vs KMI Comparison July 2026
PBA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBA stands at 27.1B. In comparison, KMI has a market cap of 71.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PBA is priced at $46.70, while KMI trades at $32.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBA currently has a P/E ratio of 24.19, whereas KMI's P/E ratio is 22.42. In terms of profitability, PBA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KMI's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PBA is less volatile compared to KMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBA.Check KMI's competition here
PBA vs TRP Comparison July 2026
PBA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBA stands at 27.1B. In comparison, TRP has a market cap of 71.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PBA is priced at $46.70, while TRP trades at $68.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBA currently has a P/E ratio of 24.19, whereas TRP's P/E ratio is 26.66. In terms of profitability, PBA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TRP's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PBA is less volatile compared to TRP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBA.Check TRP's competition here
PBA vs ET-PI Comparison July 2026
PBA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBA stands at 27.1B. In comparison, ET-PI has a market cap of 66B. Regarding current trading prices, PBA is priced at $46.70, while ET-PI trades at $11.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBA currently has a P/E ratio of 24.19, whereas ET-PI's P/E ratio is 9.32. In terms of profitability, PBA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ET-PI's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PBA is more volatile compared to ET-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBA.Check ET-PI's competition here
PBA vs ET Comparison July 2026
PBA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBA stands at 27.1B. In comparison, ET has a market cap of 65.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PBA is priced at $46.70, while ET trades at $19.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBA currently has a P/E ratio of 24.19, whereas ET's P/E ratio is 15.87. In terms of profitability, PBA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ET's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PBA is less volatile compared to ET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBA.Check ET's competition here
PBA vs TRGP Comparison July 2026
PBA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBA stands at 27.1B. In comparison, TRGP has a market cap of 58.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PBA is priced at $46.70, while TRGP trades at $271.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBA currently has a P/E ratio of 24.19, whereas TRGP's P/E ratio is 27.72. In terms of profitability, PBA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TRGP's ROE of +0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, PBA is less volatile compared to TRGP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBA.Check TRGP's competition here
PBA vs MPLX Comparison July 2026
PBA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBA stands at 27.1B. In comparison, MPLX has a market cap of 57B. Regarding current trading prices, PBA is priced at $46.70, while MPLX trades at $56.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBA currently has a P/E ratio of 24.19, whereas MPLX's P/E ratio is 12.17. In terms of profitability, PBA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MPLX's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, PBA is more volatile compared to MPLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBA.Check MPLX's competition here
PBA vs OKE Comparison July 2026
PBA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBA stands at 27.1B. In comparison, OKE has a market cap of 55.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PBA is priced at $46.70, while OKE trades at $88.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBA currently has a P/E ratio of 24.19, whereas OKE's P/E ratio is 15.82. In terms of profitability, PBA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to OKE's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PBA is less volatile compared to OKE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBA.Check OKE's competition here
PBA vs LNG Comparison July 2026
PBA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBA stands at 27.1B. In comparison, LNG has a market cap of 51.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PBA is priced at $46.70, while LNG trades at $243.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBA currently has a P/E ratio of 24.19, whereas LNG's P/E ratio is 39.91. In terms of profitability, PBA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LNG's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, PBA is more volatile compared to LNG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBA.Check LNG's competition here
PBA vs ET-PC Comparison July 2026
PBA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBA stands at 27.1B. In comparison, ET-PC has a market cap of 50.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PBA is priced at $46.70, while ET-PC trades at $25.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBA currently has a P/E ratio of 24.19, whereas ET-PC's P/E ratio is 23.81. In terms of profitability, PBA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ET-PC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PBA is more volatile compared to ET-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBA.Check ET-PC's competition here
PBA vs ET-PD Comparison July 2026
PBA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBA stands at 27.1B. In comparison, ET-PD has a market cap of 50.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PBA is priced at $46.70, while ET-PD trades at $25.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBA currently has a P/E ratio of 24.19, whereas ET-PD's P/E ratio is 23.81. In terms of profitability, PBA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ET-PD's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PBA is more volatile compared to ET-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBA.Check ET-PD's competition here
PBA vs ENBA Comparison July 2026
PBA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBA stands at 27.1B. In comparison, ENBA has a market cap of 41.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PBA is priced at $46.70, while ENBA trades at $25.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBA currently has a P/E ratio of 24.19, whereas ENBA's P/E ratio is 24.08. In terms of profitability, PBA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ENBA's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PBA is more volatile compared to ENBA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBA.Check ENBA's competition here
PBA vs MPLXP Comparison July 2026
PBA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBA stands at 27.1B. In comparison, MPLXP has a market cap of 33.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PBA is priced at $46.70, while MPLXP trades at $33.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBA currently has a P/E ratio of 24.19, whereas MPLXP's P/E ratio is 11.29. In terms of profitability, PBA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MPLXP's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, PBA is more volatile compared to MPLXP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBA.Check MPLXP's competition here
PBA vs CQP Comparison July 2026
PBA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBA stands at 27.1B. In comparison, CQP has a market cap of 29.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PBA is priced at $46.70, while CQP trades at $60.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBA currently has a P/E ratio of 24.19, whereas CQP's P/E ratio is 11.42. In terms of profitability, PBA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CQP's ROE of +0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, PBA is less volatile compared to CQP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBA.Check CQP's competition here
PBA vs WES Comparison July 2026
PBA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBA stands at 27.1B. In comparison, WES has a market cap of 17.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PBA is priced at $46.70, while WES trades at $43.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBA currently has a P/E ratio of 24.19, whereas WES's P/E ratio is 14.18. In terms of profitability, PBA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to WES's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, PBA is less volatile compared to WES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBA.Check WES's competition here
PBA vs PAA Comparison July 2026
PBA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBA stands at 27.1B. In comparison, PAA has a market cap of 15.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PBA is priced at $46.70, while PAA trades at $22.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBA currently has a P/E ratio of 24.19, whereas PAA's P/E ratio is 14.36. In terms of profitability, PBA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PAA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PBA is less volatile compared to PAA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBA.Check PAA's competition here
PBA vs VNOM Comparison July 2026
PBA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBA stands at 27.1B. In comparison, VNOM has a market cap of 15.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PBA is priced at $46.70, while VNOM trades at $42.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBA currently has a P/E ratio of 24.19, whereas VNOM's P/E ratio is 25.40. In terms of profitability, PBA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VNOM's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PBA is less volatile compared to VNOM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBA.Check VNOM's competition here
PBA vs DTM Comparison July 2026
PBA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBA stands at 27.1B. In comparison, DTM has a market cap of 15.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PBA is priced at $46.70, while DTM trades at $147.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBA currently has a P/E ratio of 24.19, whereas DTM's P/E ratio is 32.68. In terms of profitability, PBA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DTM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PBA is less volatile compared to DTM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBA.Check DTM's competition here
PBA vs MMP Comparison July 2026
PBA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBA stands at 27.1B. In comparison, MMP has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PBA is priced at $46.70, while MMP trades at $69.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBA currently has a P/E ratio of 24.19, whereas MMP's P/E ratio is 13.80. In terms of profitability, PBA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MMP's ROE of -8.33%. Regarding short-term risk, PBA is less volatile compared to MMP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBA.Check MMP's competition here
PBA vs AM Comparison July 2026
PBA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBA stands at 27.1B. In comparison, AM has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PBA is priced at $46.70, while AM trades at $22.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBA currently has a P/E ratio of 24.19, whereas AM's P/E ratio is 26.50. In terms of profitability, PBA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AM's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PBA is less volatile compared to AM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBA.Check AM's competition here
PBA vs DCP Comparison July 2026
PBA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBA stands at 27.1B. In comparison, DCP has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PBA is priced at $46.70, while DCP trades at $41.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBA currently has a P/E ratio of 24.19, whereas DCP's P/E ratio is 7.75. In terms of profitability, PBA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DCP's ROE of -351.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PBA is more volatile compared to DCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBA.Check DCP's competition here
PBA vs HESM Comparison July 2026
PBA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBA stands at 27.1B. In comparison, HESM has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PBA is priced at $46.70, while HESM trades at $37.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBA currently has a P/E ratio of 24.19, whereas HESM's P/E ratio is 12.92. In terms of profitability, PBA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HESM's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, PBA is less volatile compared to HESM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBA.Check HESM's competition here
PBA vs SOBO Comparison July 2026
PBA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBA stands at 27.1B. In comparison, SOBO has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PBA is priced at $46.70, while SOBO trades at $35.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBA currently has a P/E ratio of 24.19, whereas SOBO's P/E ratio is 18.51. In terms of profitability, PBA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SOBO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PBA is less volatile compared to SOBO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBA.Check SOBO's competition here
PBA vs DCP-PC Comparison July 2026
PBA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBA stands at 27.1B. In comparison, DCP-PC has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PBA is priced at $46.70, while DCP-PC trades at $25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBA currently has a P/E ratio of 24.19, whereas DCP-PC's P/E ratio is 57.73. In terms of profitability, PBA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DCP-PC's ROE of -351.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PBA is more volatile compared to DCP-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBA.Check DCP-PC's competition here
PBA vs ENLC Comparison July 2026
PBA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBA stands at 27.1B. In comparison, ENLC has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PBA is priced at $46.70, while ENLC trades at $14.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBA currently has a P/E ratio of 24.19, whereas ENLC's P/E ratio is 64.18. In terms of profitability, PBA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ENLC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PBA is less volatile compared to ENLC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBA.Check ENLC's competition here
PBA vs ETRN Comparison July 2026
PBA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBA stands at 27.1B. In comparison, ETRN has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PBA is priced at $46.70, while ETRN trades at $12.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBA currently has a P/E ratio of 24.19, whereas ETRN's P/E ratio is 13.80. In terms of profitability, PBA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ETRN's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, PBA is less volatile compared to ETRN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBA.Check ETRN's competition here
PBA vs GLNG Comparison July 2026
PBA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBA stands at 27.1B. In comparison, GLNG has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PBA is priced at $46.70, while GLNG trades at $49.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBA currently has a P/E ratio of 24.19, whereas GLNG's P/E ratio is 33.55. In terms of profitability, PBA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GLNG's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PBA is less volatile compared to GLNG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBA.Check GLNG's competition here
PBA vs PAGP Comparison July 2026
PBA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBA stands at 27.1B. In comparison, PAGP has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PBA is priced at $46.70, while PAGP trades at $24.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBA currently has a P/E ratio of 24.19, whereas PAGP's P/E ratio is 31.30. In terms of profitability, PBA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PAGP's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PBA is less volatile compared to PAGP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBA.Check PAGP's competition here
PBA vs INSW Comparison July 2026
PBA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBA stands at 27.1B. In comparison, INSW has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PBA is priced at $46.70, while INSW trades at $77.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBA currently has a P/E ratio of 24.19, whereas INSW's P/E ratio is 9.13. In terms of profitability, PBA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to INSW's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, PBA is less volatile compared to INSW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBA.Check INSW's competition here
PBA vs KNTK Comparison July 2026
PBA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBA stands at 27.1B. In comparison, KNTK has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PBA is priced at $46.70, while KNTK trades at $49.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBA currently has a P/E ratio of 24.19, whereas KNTK's P/E ratio is 18.64. In terms of profitability, PBA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KNTK's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PBA is less volatile compared to KNTK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBA.Check KNTK's competition here
PBA vs EURN Comparison July 2026
PBA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBA stands at 27.1B. In comparison, EURN has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PBA is priced at $46.70, while EURN trades at $16.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBA currently has a P/E ratio of 24.19, whereas EURN's P/E ratio is 2.87. In terms of profitability, PBA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to EURN's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, PBA is less volatile compared to EURN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBA.Check EURN's competition here
PBA vs CEQP Comparison July 2026
PBA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBA stands at 27.1B. In comparison, CEQP has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, PBA is priced at $46.70, while CEQP trades at $28.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBA currently has a P/E ratio of 24.19, whereas CEQP's P/E ratio is 21.91. In terms of profitability, PBA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CEQP's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PBA is less volatile compared to CEQP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBA.Check CEQP's competition here
PBA vs SUNC Comparison July 2026
PBA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBA stands at 27.1B. In comparison, SUNC has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PBA is priced at $46.70, while SUNC trades at $68.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBA currently has a P/E ratio of 24.19, whereas SUNC's P/E ratio is 15.06. In terms of profitability, PBA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SUNC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PBA is less volatile compared to SUNC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBA.Check SUNC's competition here
PBA vs NS Comparison July 2026
PBA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBA stands at 27.1B. In comparison, NS has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PBA is priced at $46.70, while NS trades at $21.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBA currently has a P/E ratio of 24.19, whereas NS's P/E ratio is 84.46. In terms of profitability, PBA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, PBA is less volatile compared to NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBA.Check NS's competition here
PBA vs NS-PB Comparison July 2026
PBA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBA stands at 27.1B. In comparison, NS-PB has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PBA is priced at $46.70, while NS-PB trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBA currently has a P/E ratio of 24.19, whereas NS-PB's P/E ratio is -19.83. In terms of profitability, PBA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NS-PB's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, PBA is more volatile compared to NS-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBA.Check NS-PB's competition here
PBA vs NS-PA Comparison July 2026
PBA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBA stands at 27.1B. In comparison, NS-PA has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PBA is priced at $46.70, while NS-PA trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBA currently has a P/E ratio of 24.19, whereas NS-PA's P/E ratio is -8.66. In terms of profitability, PBA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NS-PA's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, PBA is more volatile compared to NS-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBA.Check NS-PA's competition here
PBA vs DKL Comparison July 2026
PBA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBA stands at 27.1B. In comparison, DKL has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PBA is priced at $46.70, while DKL trades at $51.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBA currently has a P/E ratio of 24.19, whereas DKL's P/E ratio is 16.07. In terms of profitability, PBA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DKL's ROE of +19.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PBA is less volatile compared to DKL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBA.Check DKL's competition here
PBA vs TRMD Comparison July 2026
PBA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBA stands at 27.1B. In comparison, TRMD has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PBA is priced at $46.70, while TRMD trades at $26.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBA currently has a P/E ratio of 24.19, whereas TRMD's P/E ratio is 7.74. In terms of profitability, PBA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TRMD's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PBA is less volatile compared to TRMD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBA.Check TRMD's competition here
PBA vs SEAL-PA Comparison July 2026
PBA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBA stands at 27.1B. In comparison, SEAL-PA has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PBA is priced at $46.70, while SEAL-PA trades at $25.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBA currently has a P/E ratio of 24.19, whereas SEAL-PA's P/E ratio is 95.69. In terms of profitability, PBA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SEAL-PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PBA is more volatile compared to SEAL-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBA.Check SEAL-PA's competition here
PBA vs HEP Comparison July 2026
PBA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBA stands at 27.1B. In comparison, HEP has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PBA is priced at $46.70, while HEP trades at $20.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBA currently has a P/E ratio of 24.19, whereas HEP's P/E ratio is 10.76. In terms of profitability, PBA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HEP's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, PBA is less volatile compared to HEP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBA.Check HEP's competition here
PBA vs SEAL-PB Comparison July 2026
PBA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBA stands at 27.1B. In comparison, SEAL-PB has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PBA is priced at $46.70, while SEAL-PB trades at $25.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBA currently has a P/E ratio of 24.19, whereas SEAL-PB's P/E ratio is 70.35. In terms of profitability, PBA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SEAL-PB's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PBA is more volatile compared to SEAL-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBA.Check SEAL-PB's competition here
PBA vs NS-PC Comparison July 2026
PBA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBA stands at 27.1B. In comparison, NS-PC has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PBA is priced at $46.70, while NS-PC trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBA currently has a P/E ratio of 24.19, whereas NS-PC's P/E ratio is 20.10. In terms of profitability, PBA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NS-PC's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, PBA is more volatile compared to NS-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBA.Check NS-PC's competition here
PBA vs RTLR Comparison July 2026
PBA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBA stands at 27.1B. In comparison, RTLR has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PBA is priced at $46.70, while RTLR trades at $15.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBA currently has a P/E ratio of 24.19, whereas RTLR's P/E ratio is 16.37. In terms of profitability, PBA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RTLR's ROE of -3260.98%. Regarding short-term risk, PBA is less volatile compared to RTLR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBA.Check RTLR's competition here
PBA vs NGL-PC Comparison July 2026
PBA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBA stands at 27.1B. In comparison, NGL-PC has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, PBA is priced at $46.70, while NGL-PC trades at $25.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBA currently has a P/E ratio of 24.19, whereas NGL-PC's P/E ratio is -8.62. In terms of profitability, PBA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NGL-PC's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, PBA is more volatile compared to NGL-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBA.Check NGL-PC's competition here
PBA vs NGL-PB Comparison July 2026
PBA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBA stands at 27.1B. In comparison, NGL-PB has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, PBA is priced at $46.70, while NGL-PB trades at $25.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBA currently has a P/E ratio of 24.19, whereas NGL-PB's P/E ratio is -8.49. In terms of profitability, PBA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NGL-PB's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, PBA is more volatile compared to NGL-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBA.Check NGL-PB's competition here
PBA vs NGL Comparison July 2026
PBA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBA stands at 27.1B. In comparison, NGL has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, PBA is priced at $46.70, while NGL trades at $16.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBA currently has a P/E ratio of 24.19, whereas NGL's P/E ratio is -18.59. In terms of profitability, PBA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NGL's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, PBA is less volatile compared to NGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBA.Check NGL's competition here
PBA vs NSS Comparison July 2026
PBA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBA stands at 27.1B. In comparison, NSS has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, PBA is priced at $46.70, while NSS trades at $25.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBA currently has a P/E ratio of 24.19, whereas NSS's P/E ratio is -508.80. In terms of profitability, PBA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NSS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, PBA is more volatile compared to NSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBA.Check NSS's competition here
PBA vs GEL Comparison July 2026
PBA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBA stands at 27.1B. In comparison, GEL has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PBA is priced at $46.70, while GEL trades at $14.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBA currently has a P/E ratio of 24.19, whereas GEL's P/E ratio is -74.05. In terms of profitability, PBA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GEL's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PBA is less volatile compared to GEL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBA.Check GEL's competition here
PBA vs LPG Comparison July 2026
PBA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBA stands at 27.1B. In comparison, LPG has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PBA is priced at $46.70, while LPG trades at $35.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBA currently has a P/E ratio of 24.19, whereas LPG's P/E ratio is 7.69. In terms of profitability, PBA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LPG's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PBA is less volatile compared to LPG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBA.Check LPG's competition here
PBA vs GLOG-PA Comparison July 2026
PBA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBA stands at 27.1B. In comparison, GLOG-PA has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PBA is priced at $46.70, while GLOG-PA trades at $25.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBA currently has a P/E ratio of 24.19, whereas GLOG-PA's P/E ratio is 44.93. In terms of profitability, PBA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GLOG-PA's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PBA is more volatile compared to GLOG-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBA.Check GLOG-PA's competition here
PBA vs PBT Comparison July 2026
PBA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBA stands at 27.1B. In comparison, PBT has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PBA is priced at $46.70, while PBT trades at $24.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBA currently has a P/E ratio of 24.19, whereas PBT's P/E ratio is 78.03. In terms of profitability, PBA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PBT's ROE of +90.62%. Regarding short-term risk, PBA is less volatile compared to PBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBA.Check PBT's competition here
PBA vs TEN Comparison July 2026
PBA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBA stands at 27.1B. In comparison, TEN has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PBA is priced at $46.70, while TEN trades at $35.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBA currently has a P/E ratio of 24.19, whereas TEN's P/E ratio is 5.82. In terms of profitability, PBA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TEN's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PBA is less volatile compared to TEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBA.Check TEN's competition here
PBA vs GLP-PA Comparison July 2026
PBA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBA stands at 27.1B. In comparison, GLP-PA has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, PBA is priced at $46.70, while GLP-PA trades at $43.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBA currently has a P/E ratio of 24.19, whereas GLP-PA's P/E ratio is 21.49. In terms of profitability, PBA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GLP-PA's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PBA is less volatile compared to GLP-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBA.Check GLP-PA's competition here
PBA vs CEQP-P Comparison July 2026
PBA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBA stands at 27.1B. In comparison, CEQP-P has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, PBA is priced at $46.70, while CEQP-P trades at $9.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBA currently has a P/E ratio of 24.19, whereas CEQP-P's P/E ratio is -12.22. In terms of profitability, PBA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CEQP-P's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PBA is less volatile compared to CEQP-P. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBA.Check CEQP-P's competition here
PBA vs TNP-PE Comparison July 2026
PBA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBA stands at 27.1B. In comparison, TNP-PE has a market cap of 991.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PBA is priced at $46.70, while TNP-PE trades at $78.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBA currently has a P/E ratio of 24.19, whereas TNP-PE's P/E ratio is -8.23. In terms of profitability, PBA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TNP-PE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PBA is less volatile compared to TNP-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBA.Check TNP-PE's competition here
PBA vs TK Comparison July 2026
PBA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBA stands at 27.1B. In comparison, TK has a market cap of 901.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PBA is priced at $46.70, while TK trades at $10.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBA currently has a P/E ratio of 24.19, whereas TK's P/E ratio is 6.86. In terms of profitability, PBA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PBA is less volatile compared to TK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBA.Check TK's competition here
PBA vs TEN-PE Comparison July 2026
PBA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBA stands at 27.1B. In comparison, TEN-PE has a market cap of 541.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PBA is priced at $46.70, while TEN-PE trades at $26.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBA currently has a P/E ratio of 24.19, whereas TEN-PE's P/E ratio is 5.90. In terms of profitability, PBA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TEN-PE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PBA is more volatile compared to TEN-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBA.Check TEN-PE's competition here
PBA vs TNP Comparison July 2026
PBA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBA stands at 27.1B. In comparison, TNP has a market cap of 539.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PBA is priced at $46.70, while TNP trades at $18.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBA currently has a P/E ratio of 24.19, whereas TNP's P/E ratio is 3.69. In terms of profitability, PBA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TNP's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PBA is less volatile compared to TNP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBA.Check TNP's competition here
PBA vs GLOP-PA Comparison July 2026
PBA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBA stands at 27.1B. In comparison, GLOP-PA has a market cap of 409.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PBA is priced at $46.70, while GLOP-PA trades at $25.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBA currently has a P/E ratio of 24.19, whereas GLOP-PA's P/E ratio is -65.54. In terms of profitability, PBA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GLOP-PA's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PBA is more volatile compared to GLOP-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBA.Check GLOP-PA's competition here
PBA vs GLOP-PC Comparison July 2026
PBA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBA stands at 27.1B. In comparison, GLOP-PC has a market cap of 405.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PBA is priced at $46.70, while GLOP-PC trades at $25.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBA currently has a P/E ratio of 24.19, whereas GLOP-PC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PBA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GLOP-PC's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PBA is more volatile compared to GLOP-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBA.Check GLOP-PC's competition here
PBA vs SMLP Comparison July 2026
PBA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBA stands at 27.1B. In comparison, SMLP has a market cap of 405.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PBA is priced at $46.70, while SMLP trades at $38.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBA currently has a P/E ratio of 24.19, whereas SMLP's P/E ratio is 5.30. In terms of profitability, PBA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SMLP's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PBA is less volatile compared to SMLP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBA.Check SMLP's competition here
PBA vs SMC Comparison July 2026
PBA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBA stands at 27.1B. In comparison, SMC has a market cap of 392.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PBA is priced at $46.70, while SMC trades at $28.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBA currently has a P/E ratio of 24.19, whereas SMC's P/E ratio is -15.11. In terms of profitability, PBA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SMC's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PBA is less volatile compared to SMC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBA.Check SMC's competition here
PBA vs DSSI Comparison July 2026
PBA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBA stands at 27.1B. In comparison, DSSI has a market cap of 384.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PBA is priced at $46.70, while DSSI trades at $9.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBA currently has a P/E ratio of 24.19, whereas DSSI's P/E ratio is -6.99. In terms of profitability, PBA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DSSI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PBA is less volatile compared to DSSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBA.Check DSSI's competition here
PBA vs SNMP Comparison July 2026
PBA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBA stands at 27.1B. In comparison, SNMP has a market cap of 338.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PBA is priced at $46.70, while SNMP trades at $1.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBA currently has a P/E ratio of 24.19, whereas SNMP's P/E ratio is -3.91. In terms of profitability, PBA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SNMP's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, PBA is less volatile compared to SNMP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBA.Check SNMP's competition here
PBA vs TNP-PF Comparison July 2026
PBA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBA stands at 27.1B. In comparison, TNP-PF has a market cap of 334.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PBA is priced at $46.70, while TNP-PF trades at $27.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBA currently has a P/E ratio of 24.19, whereas TNP-PF's P/E ratio is -2.84. In terms of profitability, PBA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TNP-PF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PBA is more volatile compared to TNP-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBA.Check TNP-PF's competition here
PBA vs TNP-PD Comparison July 2026
PBA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBA stands at 27.1B. In comparison, TNP-PD has a market cap of 321.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PBA is priced at $46.70, while TNP-PD trades at $25.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBA currently has a P/E ratio of 24.19, whereas TNP-PD's P/E ratio is -2.65. In terms of profitability, PBA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TNP-PD's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PBA is more volatile compared to TNP-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBA.Check TNP-PD's competition here
PBA vs GPP Comparison July 2026
PBA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBA stands at 27.1B. In comparison, GPP has a market cap of 286.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PBA is priced at $46.70, while GPP trades at $12.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBA currently has a P/E ratio of 24.19, whereas GPP's P/E ratio is 7.60. In terms of profitability, PBA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GPP's ROE of +26.63%. Regarding short-term risk, PBA is less volatile compared to GPP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBA.Check GPP's competition here
PBA vs GLOP Comparison July 2026
PBA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBA stands at 27.1B. In comparison, GLOP has a market cap of 277.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PBA is priced at $46.70, while GLOP trades at $5.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBA currently has a P/E ratio of 24.19, whereas GLOP's P/E ratio is 3.07. In terms of profitability, PBA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GLOP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PBA is less volatile compared to GLOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBA.Check GLOP's competition here
PBA vs BROG Comparison July 2026
PBA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBA stands at 27.1B. In comparison, BROG has a market cap of 232.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PBA is priced at $46.70, while BROG trades at $2.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBA currently has a P/E ratio of 24.19, whereas BROG's P/E ratio is 52.00. In terms of profitability, PBA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BROG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PBA is less volatile compared to BROG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBA.Check BROG's competition here
PBA vs MMLP Comparison July 2026
PBA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBA stands at 27.1B. In comparison, MMLP has a market cap of 88.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PBA is priced at $46.70, while MMLP trades at $2.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBA currently has a P/E ratio of 24.19, whereas MMLP's P/E ratio is -4.43. In terms of profitability, PBA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MMLP's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, PBA is less volatile compared to MMLP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBA.Check MMLP's competition here
PBA vs DLNG-PB Comparison July 2026
PBA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBA stands at 27.1B. In comparison, DLNG-PB has a market cap of 83.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PBA is priced at $46.70, while DLNG-PB trades at $25.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBA currently has a P/E ratio of 24.19, whereas DLNG-PB's P/E ratio is 22.51. In terms of profitability, PBA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DLNG-PB's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PBA is more volatile compared to DLNG-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBA.Check DLNG-PB's competition here
PBA vs BANL Comparison July 2026
PBA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBA stands at 27.1B. In comparison, BANL has a market cap of 10.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PBA is priced at $46.70, while BANL trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBA currently has a P/E ratio of 24.19, whereas BANL's P/E ratio is -21.40. In terms of profitability, PBA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BANL's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PBA is less volatile compared to BANL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBA.Check BANL's competition here
PBA vs MARPS Comparison July 2026
PBA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBA stands at 27.1B. In comparison, MARPS has a market cap of 8.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PBA is priced at $46.70, while MARPS trades at $4.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBA currently has a P/E ratio of 24.19, whereas MARPS's P/E ratio is 13.88. In terms of profitability, PBA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MARPS's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, PBA is less volatile compared to MARPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBA.Check MARPS's competition here
PBA vs PTLE Comparison July 2026
PBA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBA stands at 27.1B. In comparison, PTLE has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PBA is priced at $46.70, while PTLE trades at $6.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBA currently has a P/E ratio of 24.19, whereas PTLE's P/E ratio is -2.44. In terms of profitability, PBA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PTLE's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PBA is less volatile compared to PTLE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBA.Check PTLE's competition here
PBA vs RBNE Comparison July 2026
PBA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBA stands at 27.1B. In comparison, RBNE has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PBA is priced at $46.70, while RBNE trades at $0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBA currently has a P/E ratio of 24.19, whereas RBNE's P/E ratio is -3.15. In terms of profitability, PBA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RBNE's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PBA is less volatile compared to RBNE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBA.Check RBNE's competition here
PBA vs BROGW Comparison July 2026
PBA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBA stands at 27.1B. In comparison, BROGW has a market cap of 61.5K. Regarding current trading prices, PBA is priced at $46.70, while BROGW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBA currently has a P/E ratio of 24.19, whereas BROGW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PBA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BROGW's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PBA is less volatile compared to BROGW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBA.Check BROGW's competition here
PBA vs WPZ Comparison July 2026
PBA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBA stands at 27.1B. In comparison, WPZ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PBA is priced at $46.70, while WPZ trades at $47.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBA currently has a P/E ratio of 24.19, whereas WPZ's P/E ratio is 37.61. In terms of profitability, PBA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to WPZ's ROE of -290.33%. Regarding short-term risk, PBA is less volatile compared to WPZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBA.Check WPZ's competition here
PBA vs CQH Comparison July 2026
PBA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBA stands at 27.1B. In comparison, CQH has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PBA is priced at $46.70, while CQH trades at $32.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBA currently has a P/E ratio of 24.19, whereas CQH's P/E ratio is 20.80. In terms of profitability, PBA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CQH's ROE of -4.75%. Regarding short-term risk, PBA is less volatile compared to CQH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBA.Check CQH's competition here
PBA vs DCP-PB Comparison July 2026
PBA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBA stands at 27.1B. In comparison, DCP-PB has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PBA is priced at $46.70, while DCP-PB trades at $25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBA currently has a P/E ratio of 24.19, whereas DCP-PB's P/E ratio is 255.10. In terms of profitability, PBA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DCP-PB's ROE of -351.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PBA is more volatile compared to DCP-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBA.Check DCP-PB's competition here
PBA vs OMP Comparison July 2026
PBA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBA stands at 27.1B. In comparison, OMP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PBA is priced at $46.70, while OMP trades at $23.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBA currently has a P/E ratio of 24.19, whereas OMP's P/E ratio is 8.10. In terms of profitability, PBA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to OMP's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PBA is less volatile compared to OMP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBA.Check OMP's competition here
PBA vs BKEP Comparison July 2026
PBA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBA stands at 27.1B. In comparison, BKEP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PBA is priced at $46.70, while BKEP trades at $4.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBA currently has a P/E ratio of 24.19, whereas BKEP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PBA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BKEP's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PBA is more volatile compared to BKEP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBA.Check BKEP's competition here
PBA vs ENBL Comparison July 2026
PBA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBA stands at 27.1B. In comparison, ENBL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PBA is priced at $46.70, while ENBL trades at $7.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBA currently has a P/E ratio of 24.19, whereas ENBL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PBA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ENBL's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PBA is less volatile compared to ENBL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBA.Check ENBL's competition here
PBA vs ENLK Comparison July 2026
PBA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBA stands at 27.1B. In comparison, ENLK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PBA is priced at $46.70, while ENLK trades at $12.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBA currently has a P/E ratio of 24.19, whereas ENLK's P/E ratio is -18.62. In terms of profitability, PBA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ENLK's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PBA is more volatile compared to ENLK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBA.Check ENLK's competition here
PBA vs BKEPP Comparison July 2026
PBA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBA stands at 27.1B. In comparison, BKEPP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PBA is priced at $46.70, while BKEPP trades at $8.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBA currently has a P/E ratio of 24.19, whereas BKEPP's P/E ratio is 35.22. In terms of profitability, PBA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BKEPP's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PBA is more volatile compared to BKEPP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBA.Check BKEPP's competition here
PBA vs EQGP Comparison July 2026
PBA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBA stands at 27.1B. In comparison, EQGP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PBA is priced at $46.70, while EQGP trades at $19.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBA currently has a P/E ratio of 24.19, whereas EQGP's P/E ratio is 10.39. In terms of profitability, PBA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to EQGP's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PBA is more volatile compared to EQGP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBA.Check EQGP's competition here
PBA vs EEQ Comparison July 2026
PBA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBA stands at 27.1B. In comparison, EEQ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PBA is priced at $46.70, while EEQ trades at $10.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBA currently has a P/E ratio of 24.19, whereas EEQ's P/E ratio is -38.89. In terms of profitability, PBA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to EEQ's ROE of -32.22%. Regarding short-term risk, PBA is more volatile compared to EEQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBA.Check EEQ's competition here
PBA vs ETP Comparison July 2026
PBA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBA stands at 27.1B. In comparison, ETP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PBA is priced at $46.70, while ETP trades at $16.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBA currently has a P/E ratio of 24.19, whereas ETP's P/E ratio is -134.62. In terms of profitability, PBA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ETP's ROE of +15.78%. Regarding short-term risk, PBA is more volatile compared to ETP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBA.Check ETP's competition here
PBA vs BPMP Comparison July 2026
PBA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBA stands at 27.1B. In comparison, BPMP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PBA is priced at $46.70, while BPMP trades at $17.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBA currently has a P/E ratio of 24.19, whereas BPMP's P/E ratio is 12.26. In terms of profitability, PBA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BPMP's ROE of +1.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PBA is more volatile compared to BPMP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBA.Check BPMP's competition here
PBA vs CPGX Comparison July 2026
PBA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBA stands at 27.1B. In comparison, CPGX has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PBA is priced at $46.70, while CPGX trades at $25.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBA currently has a P/E ratio of 24.19, whereas CPGX's P/E ratio is 88.20. In terms of profitability, PBA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CPGX's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PBA is more volatile compared to CPGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBA.Check CPGX's competition here
PBA vs VLP Comparison July 2026
PBA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBA stands at 27.1B. In comparison, VLP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PBA is priced at $46.70, while VLP trades at $42.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBA currently has a P/E ratio of 24.19, whereas VLP's P/E ratio is 11.07. In terms of profitability, PBA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VLP's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PBA is more volatile compared to VLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBA.Check VLP's competition here
PBA vs HMLP Comparison July 2026
PBA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBA stands at 27.1B. In comparison, HMLP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PBA is priced at $46.70, while HMLP trades at $9.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBA currently has a P/E ratio of 24.19, whereas HMLP's P/E ratio is 6.04. In terms of profitability, PBA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HMLP's ROE of -2.65%. Regarding short-term risk, PBA is more volatile compared to HMLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBA.Check HMLP's competition here
PBA vs HMLP-PA Comparison July 2026
PBA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBA stands at 27.1B. In comparison, HMLP-PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PBA is priced at $46.70, while HMLP-PA trades at $17.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBA currently has a P/E ratio of 24.19, whereas HMLP-PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PBA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HMLP-PA's ROE of -2.65%. Regarding short-term risk, PBA is less volatile compared to HMLP-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBA.Check HMLP-PA's competition here
PBA vs MEP Comparison July 2026
PBA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBA stands at 27.1B. In comparison, MEP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PBA is priced at $46.70, while MEP trades at $68.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBA currently has a P/E ratio of 24.19, whereas MEP's P/E ratio is -19.63. In terms of profitability, PBA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MEP's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PBA is less volatile compared to MEP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBA.Check MEP's competition here
PBA vs PBFX Comparison July 2026
PBA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBA stands at 27.1B. In comparison, PBFX has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PBA is priced at $46.70, while PBFX trades at $19.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBA currently has a P/E ratio of 24.19, whereas PBFX's P/E ratio is 8.22. In terms of profitability, PBA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PBFX's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, PBA is less volatile compared to PBFX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBA.Check PBFX's competition here
PBA vs PSXP Comparison July 2026
PBA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBA stands at 27.1B. In comparison, PSXP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PBA is priced at $46.70, while PSXP trades at $42.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBA currently has a P/E ratio of 24.19, whereas PSXP's P/E ratio is 14.05. In terms of profitability, PBA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PSXP's ROE of -518.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PBA is less volatile compared to PSXP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBA.Check PSXP's competition here