Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (TEN-PE) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (TEN-PE) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Oil & Gas Midstream Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TEN-PE | $26.47 | +0.39% | 538.8M | 6.00 | $4.41 | +8.75% |
| ET-PE | $81.43 | +4.82% | 170.2B | 75.82 | $1.07 | +6.58% |
| ENB | $55.46 | -0.48% | 121.1B | 25.92 | $2.14 | +5.00% |
| EP-PC | $50.77 | -0.45% | 112.8B | 28.59 | $1.78 | +4.68% |
| WMB | $73.36 | -1.08% | 89.7B | 32.90 | $2.23 | +2.79% |
| EPD | $38.56 | -0.57% | 83.4B | 14.29 | $2.70 | +5.65% |
| KMI | $32.38 | -0.61% | 72B | 22.48 | $1.44 | +3.63% |
| TRP | $68.67 | +0.26% | 71.6B | 26.73 | $2.57 | +3.63% |
| ET | $20.25 | -0.15% | 69.7B | 16.88 | $1.20 | +6.58% |
| ET-PI | $11.53 | -0.09% | 69.6B | 9.37 | $1.23 | +6.58% |
Stock Comparison
TEN-PE vs ET-PE Comparison July 2026
TEN-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 538.8M. In comparison, ET-PE has a market cap of 170.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $26.47, while ET-PE trades at $81.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas ET-PE's P/E ratio is 75.82. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ET-PE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to ET-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check ET-PE's competition here
TEN-PE vs ENB Comparison July 2026
TEN-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 538.8M. In comparison, ENB has a market cap of 121.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $26.47, while ENB trades at $55.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas ENB's P/E ratio is 25.92. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ENB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to ENB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check ENB's competition here
TEN-PE vs EP-PC Comparison July 2026
TEN-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 538.8M. In comparison, EP-PC has a market cap of 112.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $26.47, while EP-PC trades at $50.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas EP-PC's P/E ratio is 28.59. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EP-PC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is more volatile compared to EP-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check EP-PC's competition here
TEN-PE vs WMB Comparison July 2026
TEN-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 538.8M. In comparison, WMB has a market cap of 89.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $26.47, while WMB trades at $73.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas WMB's P/E ratio is 32.90. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WMB's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to WMB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check WMB's competition here
TEN-PE vs EPD Comparison July 2026
TEN-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 538.8M. In comparison, EPD has a market cap of 83.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $26.47, while EPD trades at $38.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas EPD's P/E ratio is 14.29. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EPD's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to EPD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check EPD's competition here
TEN-PE vs KMI Comparison July 2026
TEN-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 538.8M. In comparison, KMI has a market cap of 72B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $26.47, while KMI trades at $32.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas KMI's P/E ratio is 22.48. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KMI's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to KMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check KMI's competition here
TEN-PE vs TRP Comparison July 2026
TEN-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 538.8M. In comparison, TRP has a market cap of 71.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $26.47, while TRP trades at $68.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas TRP's P/E ratio is 26.73. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TRP's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to TRP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check TRP's competition here
TEN-PE vs ET Comparison July 2026
TEN-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 538.8M. In comparison, ET has a market cap of 69.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $26.47, while ET trades at $20.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas ET's P/E ratio is 16.88. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ET's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to ET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check ET's competition here
TEN-PE vs ET-PI Comparison July 2026
TEN-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 538.8M. In comparison, ET-PI has a market cap of 69.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $26.47, while ET-PI trades at $11.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas ET-PI's P/E ratio is 9.37. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ET-PI's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is more volatile compared to ET-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check ET-PI's competition here
TEN-PE vs TRGP Comparison July 2026
TEN-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 538.8M. In comparison, TRGP has a market cap of 60.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $26.47, while TRGP trades at $280.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas TRGP's P/E ratio is 28.62. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TRGP's ROE of +0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to TRGP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check TRGP's competition here
TEN-PE vs OKE Comparison July 2026
TEN-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 538.8M. In comparison, OKE has a market cap of 57.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $26.47, while OKE trades at $91.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas OKE's P/E ratio is 16.37. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to OKE's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to OKE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check OKE's competition here
TEN-PE vs MPLX Comparison July 2026
TEN-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 538.8M. In comparison, MPLX has a market cap of 57.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $26.47, while MPLX trades at $56.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas MPLX's P/E ratio is 12.23. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MPLX's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to MPLX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check MPLX's competition here
TEN-PE vs LNG Comparison July 2026
TEN-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 538.8M. In comparison, LNG has a market cap of 55B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $26.47, while LNG trades at $262.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas LNG's P/E ratio is 42.99. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LNG's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to LNG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check LNG's competition here
TEN-PE vs ET-PD Comparison July 2026
TEN-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 538.8M. In comparison, ET-PD has a market cap of 50.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $26.47, while ET-PD trades at $25.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas ET-PD's P/E ratio is 23.81. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ET-PD's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is more volatile compared to ET-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check ET-PD's competition here
TEN-PE vs ET-PC Comparison July 2026
TEN-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 538.8M. In comparison, ET-PC has a market cap of 50.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $26.47, while ET-PC trades at $25.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas ET-PC's P/E ratio is 23.81. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ET-PC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is more volatile compared to ET-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check ET-PC's competition here
TEN-PE vs ENBA Comparison July 2026
TEN-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 538.8M. In comparison, ENBA has a market cap of 41.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $26.47, while ENBA trades at $25.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas ENBA's P/E ratio is 24.08. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ENBA's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is more volatile compared to ENBA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check ENBA's competition here
TEN-PE vs VG Comparison July 2026
TEN-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 538.8M. In comparison, VG has a market cap of 34.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $26.47, while VG trades at $14.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas VG's P/E ratio is 15.63. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VG's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to VG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check VG's competition here
TEN-PE vs MPLXP Comparison July 2026
TEN-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 538.8M. In comparison, MPLXP has a market cap of 33.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $26.47, while MPLXP trades at $33.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas MPLXP's P/E ratio is 11.29. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MPLXP's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is more volatile compared to MPLXP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check MPLXP's competition here
TEN-PE vs CQP Comparison July 2026
TEN-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 538.8M. In comparison, CQP has a market cap of 30.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $26.47, while CQP trades at $63.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas CQP's P/E ratio is 11.98. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CQP's ROE of +0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to CQP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check CQP's competition here
TEN-PE vs PBA Comparison July 2026
TEN-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 538.8M. In comparison, PBA has a market cap of 29.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $26.47, while PBA trades at $50.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas PBA's P/E ratio is 26.12. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PBA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to PBA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check PBA's competition here
TEN-PE vs TCPA Comparison July 2026
TEN-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 538.8M. In comparison, TCPA has a market cap of 23.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $26.47, while TCPA trades at $23.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas TCPA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TCPA's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to TCPA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check TCPA's competition here
TEN-PE vs WES Comparison July 2026
TEN-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 538.8M. In comparison, WES has a market cap of 19.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $26.47, while WES trades at $46.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas WES's P/E ratio is 15.23. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WES's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to WES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check WES's competition here
TEN-PE vs PAA Comparison July 2026
TEN-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 538.8M. In comparison, PAA has a market cap of 17.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $26.47, while PAA trades at $24.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas PAA's P/E ratio is 15.77. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PAA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to PAA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check PAA's competition here
TEN-PE vs VNOM Comparison July 2026
TEN-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 538.8M. In comparison, VNOM has a market cap of 16.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $26.47, while VNOM trades at $44.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas VNOM's P/E ratio is 26.86. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VNOM's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to VNOM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check VNOM's competition here
TEN-PE vs DTM Comparison July 2026
TEN-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 538.8M. In comparison, DTM has a market cap of 14.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $26.47, while DTM trades at $141.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas DTM's P/E ratio is 31.39. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DTM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to DTM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check DTM's competition here
TEN-PE vs MMP Comparison July 2026
TEN-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 538.8M. In comparison, MMP has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $26.47, while MMP trades at $69.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas MMP's P/E ratio is 13.80. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MMP's ROE of -8.33%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to MMP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check MMP's competition here
TEN-PE vs AM Comparison July 2026
TEN-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 538.8M. In comparison, AM has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $26.47, while AM trades at $22.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas AM's P/E ratio is 26.16. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AM's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to AM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check AM's competition here
TEN-PE vs DCP Comparison July 2026
TEN-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 538.8M. In comparison, DCP has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $26.47, while DCP trades at $41.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas DCP's P/E ratio is 7.75. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DCP's ROE of -351.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is more volatile compared to DCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check DCP's competition here
TEN-PE vs HESM Comparison July 2026
TEN-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 538.8M. In comparison, HESM has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $26.47, while HESM trades at $39.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas HESM's P/E ratio is 13.91. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HESM's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to HESM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check HESM's competition here
TEN-PE vs SOBO Comparison July 2026
TEN-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 538.8M. In comparison, SOBO has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $26.47, while SOBO trades at $37.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas SOBO's P/E ratio is 19.30. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SOBO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to SOBO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check SOBO's competition here
TEN-PE vs DCP-PC Comparison July 2026
TEN-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 538.8M. In comparison, DCP-PC has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $26.47, while DCP-PC trades at $25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas DCP-PC's P/E ratio is 57.73. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DCP-PC's ROE of -351.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is more volatile compared to DCP-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check DCP-PC's competition here
TEN-PE vs ENLC Comparison July 2026
TEN-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 538.8M. In comparison, ENLC has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $26.47, while ENLC trades at $14.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas ENLC's P/E ratio is 64.18. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ENLC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to ENLC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check ENLC's competition here
TEN-PE vs ETRN Comparison July 2026
TEN-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 538.8M. In comparison, ETRN has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $26.47, while ETRN trades at $12.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas ETRN's P/E ratio is 13.80. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ETRN's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to ETRN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check ETRN's competition here
TEN-PE vs PAGP Comparison July 2026
TEN-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 538.8M. In comparison, PAGP has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $26.47, while PAGP trades at $25.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas PAGP's P/E ratio is 33.74. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PAGP's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to PAGP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check PAGP's competition here
TEN-PE vs GLNG Comparison July 2026
TEN-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 538.8M. In comparison, GLNG has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $26.47, while GLNG trades at $49.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas GLNG's P/E ratio is 33.62. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GLNG's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to GLNG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check GLNG's competition here
TEN-PE vs INSW Comparison July 2026
TEN-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 538.8M. In comparison, INSW has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $26.47, while INSW trades at $90.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas INSW's P/E ratio is 10.62. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to INSW's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to INSW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check INSW's competition here
TEN-PE vs KNTK Comparison July 2026
TEN-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 538.8M. In comparison, KNTK has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $26.47, while KNTK trades at $50.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas KNTK's P/E ratio is 19.22. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KNTK's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to KNTK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check KNTK's competition here
TEN-PE vs EURN Comparison July 2026
TEN-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 538.8M. In comparison, EURN has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $26.47, while EURN trades at $16.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas EURN's P/E ratio is 2.87. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EURN's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to EURN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check EURN's competition here
TEN-PE vs SUNC Comparison July 2026
TEN-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 538.8M. In comparison, SUNC has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $26.47, while SUNC trades at $74.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas SUNC's P/E ratio is 16.39. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SUNC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to SUNC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check SUNC's competition here
TEN-PE vs TRMD Comparison July 2026
TEN-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 538.8M. In comparison, TRMD has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $26.47, while TRMD trades at $29.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas TRMD's P/E ratio is 8.79. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TRMD's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to TRMD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check TRMD's competition here
TEN-PE vs CEQP Comparison July 2026
TEN-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 538.8M. In comparison, CEQP has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $26.47, while CEQP trades at $28.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas CEQP's P/E ratio is 21.91. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CEQP's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to CEQP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check CEQP's competition here
TEN-PE vs DKL Comparison July 2026
TEN-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 538.8M. In comparison, DKL has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $26.47, while DKL trades at $55.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas DKL's P/E ratio is 17.48. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DKL's ROE of +19.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to DKL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check DKL's competition here
TEN-PE vs NS Comparison July 2026
TEN-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 538.8M. In comparison, NS has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $26.47, while NS trades at $21.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas NS's P/E ratio is 84.46. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check NS's competition here
TEN-PE vs NS-PA Comparison July 2026
TEN-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 538.8M. In comparison, NS-PA has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $26.47, while NS-PA trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas NS-PA's P/E ratio is -8.66. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NS-PA's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is more volatile compared to NS-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check NS-PA's competition here
TEN-PE vs NS-PB Comparison July 2026
TEN-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 538.8M. In comparison, NS-PB has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $26.47, while NS-PB trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas NS-PB's P/E ratio is -19.83. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NS-PB's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is more volatile compared to NS-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check NS-PB's competition here
TEN-PE vs HEP Comparison July 2026
TEN-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 538.8M. In comparison, HEP has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $26.47, while HEP trades at $20.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas HEP's P/E ratio is 10.76. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HEP's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to HEP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check HEP's competition here
TEN-PE vs SEAL-PA Comparison July 2026
TEN-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 538.8M. In comparison, SEAL-PA has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $26.47, while SEAL-PA trades at $25.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas SEAL-PA's P/E ratio is 94.40. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SEAL-PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is more volatile compared to SEAL-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check SEAL-PA's competition here
TEN-PE vs SEAL-PB Comparison July 2026
TEN-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 538.8M. In comparison, SEAL-PB has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $26.47, while SEAL-PB trades at $25.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas SEAL-PB's P/E ratio is 69.93. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SEAL-PB's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to SEAL-PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check SEAL-PB's competition here
TEN-PE vs NS-PC Comparison July 2026
TEN-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 538.8M. In comparison, NS-PC has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $26.47, while NS-PC trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas NS-PC's P/E ratio is 20.10. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NS-PC's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is more volatile compared to NS-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check NS-PC's competition here
TEN-PE vs RTLR Comparison July 2026
TEN-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 538.8M. In comparison, RTLR has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $26.47, while RTLR trades at $15.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas RTLR's P/E ratio is 16.37. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RTLR's ROE of -3260.98%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to RTLR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check RTLR's competition here
TEN-PE vs NGL-PC Comparison July 2026
TEN-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 538.8M. In comparison, NGL-PC has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $26.47, while NGL-PC trades at $25.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas NGL-PC's P/E ratio is -8.48. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NGL-PC's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is more volatile compared to NGL-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check NGL-PC's competition here
TEN-PE vs NGL-PB Comparison July 2026
TEN-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 538.8M. In comparison, NGL-PB has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $26.47, while NGL-PB trades at $25.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas NGL-PB's P/E ratio is -8.42. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NGL-PB's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is more volatile compared to NGL-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check NGL-PB's competition here
TEN-PE vs NSS Comparison July 2026
TEN-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 538.8M. In comparison, NSS has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $26.47, while NSS trades at $25.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas NSS's P/E ratio is -508.80. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NSS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is more volatile compared to NSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check NSS's competition here
TEN-PE vs NGL Comparison July 2026
TEN-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 538.8M. In comparison, NGL has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $26.47, while NGL trades at $15.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas NGL's P/E ratio is -18.21. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NGL's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to NGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check NGL's competition here
TEN-PE vs LPG Comparison July 2026
TEN-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 538.8M. In comparison, LPG has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $26.47, while LPG trades at $44.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas LPG's P/E ratio is 9.69. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LPG's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to LPG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check LPG's competition here
TEN-PE vs GEL Comparison July 2026
TEN-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 538.8M. In comparison, GEL has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $26.47, while GEL trades at $14.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas GEL's P/E ratio is -77.58. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GEL's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to GEL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check GEL's competition here
TEN-PE vs GLOG-PA Comparison July 2026
TEN-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 538.8M. In comparison, GLOG-PA has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $26.47, while GLOG-PA trades at $25.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas GLOG-PA's P/E ratio is 44.93. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GLOG-PA's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is more volatile compared to GLOG-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check GLOG-PA's competition here
TEN-PE vs PBT Comparison July 2026
TEN-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 538.8M. In comparison, PBT has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $26.47, while PBT trades at $28.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas PBT's P/E ratio is 90.67. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PBT's ROE of +90.62%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to PBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check PBT's competition here
TEN-PE vs TEN Comparison July 2026
TEN-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 538.8M. In comparison, TEN has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $26.47, while TEN trades at $40.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas TEN's P/E ratio is 6.54. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TEN's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to TEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check TEN's competition here
TEN-PE vs GLP-PA Comparison July 2026
TEN-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 538.8M. In comparison, GLP-PA has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $26.47, while GLP-PA trades at $43.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas GLP-PA's P/E ratio is 21.49. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GLP-PA's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to GLP-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check GLP-PA's competition here
TEN-PE vs CEQP-P Comparison July 2026
TEN-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 538.8M. In comparison, CEQP-P has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $26.47, while CEQP-P trades at $9.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas CEQP-P's P/E ratio is -12.22. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CEQP-P's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to CEQP-P. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check CEQP-P's competition here
TEN-PE vs TNP-PE Comparison July 2026
TEN-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 538.8M. In comparison, TNP-PE has a market cap of 991.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $26.47, while TNP-PE trades at $78.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas TNP-PE's P/E ratio is -8.23. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TNP-PE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to TNP-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check TNP-PE's competition here
TEN-PE vs TK Comparison July 2026
TEN-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 538.8M. In comparison, TK has a market cap of 985.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $26.47, while TK trades at $11.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas TK's P/E ratio is 7.50. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TK's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to TK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check TK's competition here
TEN-PE vs WHK Comparison July 2026
TEN-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 538.8M. In comparison, WHK has a market cap of 592.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $26.47, while WHK trades at $25.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas WHK's P/E ratio is -171.80. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WHK's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to WHK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check WHK's competition here
TEN-PE vs TNP Comparison July 2026
TEN-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 538.8M. In comparison, TNP has a market cap of 539.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $26.47, while TNP trades at $18.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas TNP's P/E ratio is 3.69. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TNP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to TNP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check TNP's competition here
TEN-PE vs SMC Comparison July 2026
TEN-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 538.8M. In comparison, SMC has a market cap of 423.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $26.47, while SMC trades at $30.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas SMC's P/E ratio is -16.29. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SMC's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to SMC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check SMC's competition here
TEN-PE vs GLOP-PA Comparison July 2026
TEN-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 538.8M. In comparison, GLOP-PA has a market cap of 410.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $26.47, while GLOP-PA trades at $25.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas GLOP-PA's P/E ratio is 121.90. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GLOP-PA's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to GLOP-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check GLOP-PA's competition here
TEN-PE vs GLOP-PC Comparison July 2026
TEN-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 538.8M. In comparison, GLOP-PC has a market cap of 408.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $26.47, while GLOP-PC trades at $25.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas GLOP-PC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GLOP-PC's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to GLOP-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check GLOP-PC's competition here
TEN-PE vs SMLP Comparison July 2026
TEN-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 538.8M. In comparison, SMLP has a market cap of 405.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $26.47, while SMLP trades at $38.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas SMLP's P/E ratio is 5.30. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SMLP's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to SMLP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check SMLP's competition here
TEN-PE vs DSSI Comparison July 2026
TEN-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 538.8M. In comparison, DSSI has a market cap of 384.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $26.47, while DSSI trades at $9.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas DSSI's P/E ratio is -6.99. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DSSI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to DSSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check DSSI's competition here
TEN-PE vs SNMP Comparison July 2026
TEN-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 538.8M. In comparison, SNMP has a market cap of 338.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $26.47, while SNMP trades at $1.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas SNMP's P/E ratio is -3.91. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SNMP's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to SNMP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check SNMP's competition here
TEN-PE vs TNP-PF Comparison July 2026
TEN-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 538.8M. In comparison, TNP-PF has a market cap of 334.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $26.47, while TNP-PF trades at $27.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas TNP-PF's P/E ratio is -2.84. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TNP-PF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to TNP-PF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check TNP-PF's competition here
TEN-PE vs TNP-PD Comparison July 2026
TEN-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 538.8M. In comparison, TNP-PD has a market cap of 321.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $26.47, while TNP-PD trades at $25.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas TNP-PD's P/E ratio is -2.65. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TNP-PD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is more volatile compared to TNP-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check TNP-PD's competition here
TEN-PE vs GPP Comparison July 2026
TEN-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 538.8M. In comparison, GPP has a market cap of 286.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $26.47, while GPP trades at $12.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas GPP's P/E ratio is 7.60. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GPP's ROE of +26.63%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to GPP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check GPP's competition here
TEN-PE vs GLOP Comparison July 2026
TEN-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 538.8M. In comparison, GLOP has a market cap of 277.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $26.47, while GLOP trades at $5.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas GLOP's P/E ratio is 3.07. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GLOP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to GLOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check GLOP's competition here
TEN-PE vs BROG Comparison July 2026
TEN-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 538.8M. In comparison, BROG has a market cap of 232.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $26.47, while BROG trades at $2.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas BROG's P/E ratio is 52.00. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BROG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to BROG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check BROG's competition here
TEN-PE vs MMLP Comparison July 2026
TEN-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 538.8M. In comparison, MMLP has a market cap of 91.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $26.47, while MMLP trades at $2.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas MMLP's P/E ratio is -4.59. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MMLP's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to MMLP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check MMLP's competition here
TEN-PE vs DLNG-PB Comparison July 2026
TEN-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 538.8M. In comparison, DLNG-PB has a market cap of 83.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $26.47, while DLNG-PB trades at $25.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas DLNG-PB's P/E ratio is 22.51. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DLNG-PB's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is more volatile compared to DLNG-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check DLNG-PB's competition here
TEN-PE vs RBNEV Comparison July 2026
TEN-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 538.8M. In comparison, RBNEV has a market cap of 13.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $26.47, while RBNEV trades at $5.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas RBNEV's P/E ratio is -18.13. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RBNEV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to RBNEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check RBNEV's competition here
TEN-PE vs BANL Comparison July 2026
TEN-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 538.8M. In comparison, BANL has a market cap of 10.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $26.47, while BANL trades at $5.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas BANL's P/E ratio is -298.27. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BANL's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to BANL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check BANL's competition here
TEN-PE vs MARPS Comparison July 2026
TEN-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 538.8M. In comparison, MARPS has a market cap of 10.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $26.47, while MARPS trades at $5.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas MARPS's P/E ratio is 15.72. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MARPS's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to MARPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check MARPS's competition here
TEN-PE vs PTLE Comparison July 2026
TEN-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 538.8M. In comparison, PTLE has a market cap of 4.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $26.47, while PTLE trades at $10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas PTLE's P/E ratio is -3.64. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PTLE's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to PTLE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check PTLE's competition here
TEN-PE vs RBNE Comparison July 2026
TEN-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 538.8M. In comparison, RBNE has a market cap of 834.3K. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $26.47, while RBNE trades at $4.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas RBNE's P/E ratio is 0.68. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RBNE's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to RBNE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check RBNE's competition here
TEN-PE vs BROGW Comparison July 2026
TEN-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 538.8M. In comparison, BROGW has a market cap of 61.5K. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $26.47, while BROGW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas BROGW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BROGW's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to BROGW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check BROGW's competition here
TEN-PE vs HMLP Comparison July 2026
TEN-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 538.8M. In comparison, HMLP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $26.47, while HMLP trades at $9.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas HMLP's P/E ratio is 6.04. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HMLP's ROE of -2.65%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is more volatile compared to HMLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check HMLP's competition here
TEN-PE vs BKEP Comparison July 2026
TEN-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 538.8M. In comparison, BKEP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $26.47, while BKEP trades at $4.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas BKEP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BKEP's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is more volatile compared to BKEP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check BKEP's competition here
TEN-PE vs SHLX Comparison July 2026
TEN-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 538.8M. In comparison, SHLX has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $26.47, while SHLX trades at $15.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas SHLX's P/E ratio is 13.07. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SHLX's ROE of -56.82%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is more volatile compared to SHLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check SHLX's competition here
TEN-PE vs OMP Comparison July 2026
TEN-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 538.8M. In comparison, OMP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $26.47, while OMP trades at $23.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas OMP's P/E ratio is 8.10. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to OMP's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to OMP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check OMP's competition here
TEN-PE vs PSXP Comparison July 2026
TEN-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 538.8M. In comparison, PSXP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $26.47, while PSXP trades at $42.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas PSXP's P/E ratio is 14.05. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PSXP's ROE of -518.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to PSXP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check PSXP's competition here
TEN-PE vs WPZ Comparison July 2026
TEN-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 538.8M. In comparison, WPZ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $26.47, while WPZ trades at $47.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas WPZ's P/E ratio is 37.61. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WPZ's ROE of -290.33%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to WPZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check WPZ's competition here
TEN-PE vs HMLP-PA Comparison July 2026
TEN-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 538.8M. In comparison, HMLP-PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $26.47, while HMLP-PA trades at $17.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas HMLP-PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HMLP-PA's ROE of -2.65%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to HMLP-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check HMLP-PA's competition here
TEN-PE vs SEP Comparison July 2026
TEN-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 538.8M. In comparison, SEP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $26.47, while SEP trades at $35.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas SEP's P/E ratio is 44.68. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SEP's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is more volatile compared to SEP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check SEP's competition here
TEN-PE vs TEP Comparison July 2026
TEN-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 538.8M. In comparison, TEP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $26.47, while TEP trades at $43.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas TEP's P/E ratio is 6.77. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TEP's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is more volatile compared to TEP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check TEP's competition here
TEN-PE vs VLP Comparison July 2026
TEN-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 538.8M. In comparison, VLP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $26.47, while VLP trades at $42.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas VLP's P/E ratio is 45.91. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VLP's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is more volatile compared to VLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check VLP's competition here
TEN-PE vs CQH Comparison July 2026
TEN-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 538.8M. In comparison, CQH has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $26.47, while CQH trades at $32.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas CQH's P/E ratio is 20.80. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CQH's ROE of -4.75%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to CQH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check CQH's competition here
TEN-PE vs ENBL Comparison July 2026
TEN-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 538.8M. In comparison, ENBL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $26.47, while ENBL trades at $7.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas ENBL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ENBL's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to ENBL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check ENBL's competition here
TEN-PE vs ETP Comparison July 2026
TEN-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 538.8M. In comparison, ETP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $26.47, while ETP trades at $16.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas ETP's P/E ratio is -134.62. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ETP's ROE of +15.78%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is more volatile compared to ETP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check ETP's competition here
TEN-PE vs TGP Comparison July 2026
TEN-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 538.8M. In comparison, TGP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $26.47, while TGP trades at N/A.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas TGP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TGP's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is more volatile compared to TGP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check TGP's competition here
TEN-PE vs PBFX Comparison July 2026
TEN-PE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 538.8M. In comparison, PBFX has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $26.47, while PBFX trades at $19.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 6.00, whereas PBFX's P/E ratio is 8.22. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PBFX's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to PBFX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check PBFX's competition here