Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See TEN-PE's competitors and their performance on the NYSE and across the wider stock market.
Peer Comparison Table: Oil & Gas Midstream Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more for TEN-PE and its NYSE peers.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TEN-PE | $25.82 | +0.03% | 1.5B | 2.62 | $9.87 | +4.28% |
| ET-PE | $81.43 | +4.82% | 170.2B | 75.82 | $1.07 | +6.64% |
| ENB | $48.78 | -0.33% | 108.7B | 22.80 | $2.14 | +5.70% |
| WMB | $67.86 | -6.36% | 83B | 29.90 | $2.27 | +3.11% |
| EPD | $36.71 | -2.11% | 79.3B | 12.74 | $2.88 | +6.07% |
| KMI | $31.52 | -4.11% | 70.2B | 20.60 | $1.53 | +3.78% |
| ET | $20.25 | +1.84% | 69.7B | 13.77 | $1.47 | +6.64% |
| TRP | $62.61 | -1.29% | 65.2B | 24.37 | $2.57 | +3.98% |
| TRGP | $285.00 | -4.54% | 61.1B | 27.24 | $10.46 | +1.67% |
| LNG | $292.02 | -6.15% | 59.6B | 20.33 | $14.36 | +0.76% |
Stock Comparison
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET-PE)
TEN-PE vs ET-PE Comparison November 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ET-PE has a market cap of 170.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.82 on the NYSE, while ET-PE trades at $81.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.62, whereas ET-PE's P/E ratio is 75.82. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ET-PE's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to ET-PE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check ET-PE's competition here
Enbridge Inc. (NYSE: ENB)
TEN-PE vs ENB Comparison November 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ENB has a market cap of 108.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.82 on the NYSE, while ENB trades at $48.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.62, whereas ENB's P/E ratio is 22.80. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ENB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to ENB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check ENB's competition here
The Williams Companies, Inc. (NYSE: WMB)
TEN-PE vs WMB Comparison November 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 1.5B. In comparison, WMB has a market cap of 83B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.82 on the NYSE, while WMB trades at $67.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.62, whereas WMB's P/E ratio is 29.90. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.17%, compared to WMB's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to WMB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check WMB's competition here
Enterprise Products Partners L.P. (NYSE: EPD)
TEN-PE vs EPD Comparison November 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 1.5B. In comparison, EPD has a market cap of 79.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.82 on the NYSE, while EPD trades at $36.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.62, whereas EPD's P/E ratio is 12.74. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.17%, compared to EPD's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to EPD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check EPD's competition here
Kinder Morgan, Inc. (NYSE: KMI)
TEN-PE vs KMI Comparison November 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 1.5B. In comparison, KMI has a market cap of 70.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.82 on the NYSE, while KMI trades at $31.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.62, whereas KMI's P/E ratio is 20.60. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.17%, compared to KMI's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to KMI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check KMI's competition here
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET)
TEN-PE vs ET Comparison November 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ET has a market cap of 69.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.82 on the NYSE, while ET trades at $20.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.62, whereas ET's P/E ratio is 13.77. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ET's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to ET. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check ET's competition here
TC Energy Corporation (NYSE: TRP)
TEN-PE vs TRP Comparison November 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 1.5B. In comparison, TRP has a market cap of 65.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.82 on the NYSE, while TRP trades at $62.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.62, whereas TRP's P/E ratio is 24.37. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TRP's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to TRP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check TRP's competition here
Targa Resources Corp. (NYSE: TRGP)
TEN-PE vs TRGP Comparison November 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 1.5B. In comparison, TRGP has a market cap of 61.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.82 on the NYSE, while TRGP trades at $285.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.62, whereas TRGP's P/E ratio is 27.24. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TRGP's ROE of +0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to TRGP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check TRGP's competition here
Cheniere Energy, Inc. (NYSE: LNG)
TEN-PE vs LNG Comparison November 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 1.5B. In comparison, LNG has a market cap of 59.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.82 on the NYSE, while LNG trades at $292.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.62, whereas LNG's P/E ratio is 20.33. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.17%, compared to LNG's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to LNG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check LNG's competition here
MPLX Lp (NYSE: MPLX)
TEN-PE vs MPLX Comparison November 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 1.5B. In comparison, MPLX has a market cap of 57B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.82 on the NYSE, while MPLX trades at $56.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.62, whereas MPLX's P/E ratio is 12.09. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MPLX's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to MPLX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check MPLX's competition here
ONEOK, Inc. (NYSE: OKE)
TEN-PE vs OKE Comparison November 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 1.5B. In comparison, OKE has a market cap of 55.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.82 on the NYSE, while OKE trades at $88.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.62, whereas OKE's P/E ratio is 13.76. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.17%, compared to OKE's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to OKE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check OKE's competition here
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET-PD)
TEN-PE vs ET-PD Comparison November 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ET-PD has a market cap of 50.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.82 on the NYSE, while ET-PD trades at $25.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.62, whereas ET-PD's P/E ratio is 23.81. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ET-PD's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is more volatile compared to ET-PD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check ET-PD's competition here
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET-PC)
TEN-PE vs ET-PC Comparison November 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ET-PC has a market cap of 50.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.82 on the NYSE, while ET-PC trades at $25.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.62, whereas ET-PC's P/E ratio is 23.81. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ET-PC's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is more volatile compared to ET-PC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check ET-PC's competition here
Enbridge Inc. 6.375 SNT18 B 78 (NYSE: ENBA)
TEN-PE vs ENBA Comparison November 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ENBA has a market cap of 41.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.82 on the NYSE, while ENBA trades at $25.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.62, whereas ENBA's P/E ratio is 24.08. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ENBA's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is more volatile compared to ENBA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check ENBA's competition here
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET-PI)
TEN-PE vs ET-PI Comparison November 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ET-PI has a market cap of 37.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.82 on the NYSE, while ET-PI trades at $10.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.62, whereas ET-PI's P/E ratio is 7.35. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ET-PI's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is more volatile compared to ET-PI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check ET-PI's competition here
MPLX Lp (NYSE: MPLXP)
TEN-PE vs MPLXP Comparison November 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 1.5B. In comparison, MPLXP has a market cap of 33.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.82 on the NYSE, while MPLXP trades at $33.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.62, whereas MPLXP's P/E ratio is 11.29. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MPLXP's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is more volatile compared to MPLXP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check MPLXP's competition here
Venture Global, Inc. (NYSE: VG)
TEN-PE vs VG Comparison November 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 1.5B. In comparison, VG has a market cap of 30B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.82 on the NYSE, while VG trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.62, whereas VG's P/E ratio is 9.43. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.17%, compared to VG's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to VG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check VG's competition here
Pembina Pipeline Corporation (NYSE: PBA)
TEN-PE vs PBA Comparison November 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 1.5B. In comparison, PBA has a market cap of 28.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.82 on the NYSE, while PBA trades at $48.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.62, whereas PBA's P/E ratio is 25.26. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PBA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to PBA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check PBA's competition here
Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. (NYSE: CQP)
TEN-PE vs CQP Comparison November 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 1.5B. In comparison, CQP has a market cap of 27.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.82 on the NYSE, while CQP trades at $56.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.62, whereas CQP's P/E ratio is 10.05. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CQP's ROE of +0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to CQP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check CQP's competition here
TransCanada PipeLines Limited 6 (NYSE: TCPA)
TEN-PE vs TCPA Comparison November 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 1.5B. In comparison, TCPA has a market cap of 21.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.82 on the NYSE, while TCPA trades at $21.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.62, whereas TCPA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TCPA's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to TCPA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check TCPA's competition here
Plains All American Pipeline, L.P. (NASDAQ: PAA)
TEN-PE vs PAA Comparison November 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 1.5B. In comparison, PAA has a market cap of 17.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.82 on the NYSE, while PAA trades at $25.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.62, whereas PAA's P/E ratio is 16.38. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PAA's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to PAA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check PAA's competition here
Western Midstream Partners, LP (NYSE: WES)
TEN-PE vs WES Comparison November 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 1.5B. In comparison, WES has a market cap of 17.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.82 on the NYSE, while WES trades at $42.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.62, whereas WES's P/E ratio is 13.37. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.17%, compared to WES's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to WES. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check WES's competition here
Viper Energy, Inc. (NASDAQ: VNOM)
TEN-PE vs VNOM Comparison November 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 1.5B. In comparison, VNOM has a market cap of 14.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.82 on the NYSE, while VNOM trades at $41.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.62, whereas VNOM's P/E ratio is 20.33. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.17%, compared to VNOM's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to VNOM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check VNOM's competition here
Magellan Midstream Partners, L.P. (NYSE: MMP)
TEN-PE vs MMP Comparison November 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 1.5B. In comparison, MMP has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.82 on the NYSE, while MMP trades at $69.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.62, whereas MMP's P/E ratio is 13.80. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MMP's ROE of -8.33%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to MMP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check MMP's competition here
DT Midstream, Inc. (NYSE: DTM)
TEN-PE vs DTM Comparison November 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 1.5B. In comparison, DTM has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.82 on the NYSE, while DTM trades at $117.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.62, whereas DTM's P/E ratio is 26.01. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DTM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to DTM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check DTM's competition here
Antero Midstream Corporation (NYSE: AM)
TEN-PE vs AM Comparison November 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 1.5B. In comparison, AM has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.82 on the NYSE, while AM trades at $19.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.62, whereas AM's P/E ratio is 23.10. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AM's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to AM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check AM's competition here
DCP Midstream, LP (NYSE: DCP)
TEN-PE vs DCP Comparison November 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 1.5B. In comparison, DCP has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.82 on the NYSE, while DCP trades at $41.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.62, whereas DCP's P/E ratio is 7.75. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DCP's ROE of -351.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is more volatile compared to DCP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check DCP's competition here
South Bow Corporation (NYSE: SOBO)
TEN-PE vs SOBO Comparison November 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 1.5B. In comparison, SOBO has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.82 on the NYSE, while SOBO trades at $34.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.62, whereas SOBO's P/E ratio is 16.86. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SOBO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to SOBO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check SOBO's competition here
DCP Midstream, LP (NYSE: DCP-PC)
TEN-PE vs DCP-PC Comparison November 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 1.5B. In comparison, DCP-PC has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.82 on the NYSE, while DCP-PC trades at $25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.62, whereas DCP-PC's P/E ratio is 57.73. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DCP-PC's ROE of -351.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is more volatile compared to DCP-PC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check DCP-PC's competition here
Hess Midstream LP (NYSE: HESM)
TEN-PE vs HESM Comparison November 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 1.5B. In comparison, HESM has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.82 on the NYSE, while HESM trades at $31.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.62, whereas HESM's P/E ratio is 10.97. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HESM's ROE of +0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to HESM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check HESM's competition here
EnLink Midstream, LLC (NYSE: ENLC)
TEN-PE vs ENLC Comparison November 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ENLC has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.82 on the NYSE, while ENLC trades at $14.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.62, whereas ENLC's P/E ratio is 64.18. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ENLC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to ENLC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check ENLC's competition here
Equitrans Midstream Corporation (NYSE: ETRN)
TEN-PE vs ETRN Comparison November 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ETRN has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.82 on the NYSE, while ETRN trades at $12.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.62, whereas ETRN's P/E ratio is 13.80. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ETRN's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to ETRN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check ETRN's competition here
Plains GP Holdings LP (NASDAQ: PAGP)
TEN-PE vs PAGP Comparison November 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 1.5B. In comparison, PAGP has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.82 on the NYSE, while PAGP trades at $26.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.62, whereas PAGP's P/E ratio is 10.01. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PAGP's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to PAGP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check PAGP's competition here
Golar LNG Limited (NASDAQ: GLNG)
TEN-PE vs GLNG Comparison November 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 1.5B. In comparison, GLNG has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.82 on the NYSE, while GLNG trades at $44.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.62, whereas GLNG's P/E ratio is 30.32. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GLNG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to GLNG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check GLNG's competition here
Kinetik Holdings Inc. (NYSE: KNTK)
TEN-PE vs KNTK Comparison November 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 1.5B. In comparison, KNTK has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.82 on the NYSE, while KNTK trades at $51.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.62, whereas KNTK's P/E ratio is 18.55. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.17%, compared to KNTK's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to KNTK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check KNTK's competition here
Excelerate Energy, Inc. (NYSE: EE)
TEN-PE vs EE Comparison November 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 1.5B. In comparison, EE has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.82 on the NYSE, while EE trades at $34.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.62, whereas EE's P/E ratio is 23.16. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.17%, compared to EE's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to EE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check EE's competition here
SunocoCorp LLC (NYSE: SUNC)
TEN-PE vs SUNC Comparison November 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 1.5B. In comparison, SUNC has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.82 on the NYSE, while SUNC trades at $71.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.62, whereas SUNC's P/E ratio is 16.40. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SUNC's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to SUNC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check SUNC's competition here
Euronav N.V. (NYSE: EURN)
TEN-PE vs EURN Comparison November 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 1.5B. In comparison, EURN has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.82 on the NYSE, while EURN trades at $16.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.62, whereas EURN's P/E ratio is 2.87. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.17%, compared to EURN's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to EURN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check EURN's competition here
Delek Logistics Partners, LP (NYSE: DKL)
TEN-PE vs DKL Comparison November 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 1.5B. In comparison, DKL has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.82 on the NYSE, while DKL trades at $52.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.62, whereas DKL's P/E ratio is 18.29. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DKL's ROE of -9.36%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to DKL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check DKL's competition here
Crestwood Equity Partners LP (NYSE: CEQP)
TEN-PE vs CEQP Comparison November 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 1.5B. In comparison, CEQP has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.82 on the NYSE, while CEQP trades at $28.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.62, whereas CEQP's P/E ratio is 21.91. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CEQP's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to CEQP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check CEQP's competition here
NuStar Energy L.P. (NYSE: NS)
TEN-PE vs NS Comparison November 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 1.5B. In comparison, NS has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.82 on the NYSE, while NS trades at $21.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.62, whereas NS's P/E ratio is 84.46. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check NS's competition here
NuStar Energy L.P. (NYSE: NS-PA)
TEN-PE vs NS-PA Comparison November 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 1.5B. In comparison, NS-PA has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.82 on the NYSE, while NS-PA trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.62, whereas NS-PA's P/E ratio is -8.66. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NS-PA's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is more volatile compared to NS-PA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check NS-PA's competition here
NuStar Energy L.P. (NYSE: NS-PB)
TEN-PE vs NS-PB Comparison November 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 1.5B. In comparison, NS-PB has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.82 on the NYSE, while NS-PB trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.62, whereas NS-PB's P/E ratio is -19.83. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NS-PB's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is more volatile compared to NS-PB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check NS-PB's competition here
Holly Energy Partners, L.P. (NYSE: HEP)
TEN-PE vs HEP Comparison November 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 1.5B. In comparison, HEP has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.82 on the NYSE, while HEP trades at $20.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.62, whereas HEP's P/E ratio is 10.76. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HEP's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to HEP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check HEP's competition here
Seapeak LLC (NYSE: SEAL-PA)
TEN-PE vs SEAL-PA Comparison November 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 1.5B. In comparison, SEAL-PA has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.82 on the NYSE, while SEAL-PA trades at $25.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.62, whereas SEAL-PA's P/E ratio is 54.76. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SEAL-PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is more volatile compared to SEAL-PA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check SEAL-PA's competition here
NuStar Energy L.P. 9.00% CUM PFD C (NYSE: NS-PC)
TEN-PE vs NS-PC Comparison November 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 1.5B. In comparison, NS-PC has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.82 on the NYSE, while NS-PC trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.62, whereas NS-PC's P/E ratio is 20.10. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NS-PC's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is more volatile compared to NS-PC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check NS-PC's competition here
Rattler Midstream LP (NASDAQ: RTLR)
TEN-PE vs RTLR Comparison November 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 1.5B. In comparison, RTLR has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.82 on the NYSE, while RTLR trades at $15.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.62, whereas RTLR's P/E ratio is 16.37. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.17%, compared to RTLR's ROE of -3260.98%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to RTLR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check RTLR's competition here
Seapeak LLC (NYSE: SEAL-PB)
TEN-PE vs SEAL-PB Comparison November 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 1.5B. In comparison, SEAL-PB has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.82 on the NYSE, while SEAL-PB trades at $25.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.62, whereas SEAL-PB's P/E ratio is 54.91. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SEAL-PB's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to SEAL-PB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check SEAL-PB's competition here
Dorian LPG Ltd. (NYSE: LPG)
TEN-PE vs LPG Comparison November 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 1.5B. In comparison, LPG has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.82 on the NYSE, while LPG trades at $49.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.62, whereas LPG's P/E ratio is 7.24. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.17%, compared to LPG's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to LPG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check LPG's competition here
NGL Energy Partners LP (NYSE: NGL-PB)
TEN-PE vs NGL-PB Comparison November 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 1.5B. In comparison, NGL-PB has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.82 on the NYSE, while NGL-PB trades at $25.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.62, whereas NGL-PB's P/E ratio is -8.84. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NGL-PB's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to NGL-PB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check NGL-PB's competition here
NGL Energy Partners LP (NYSE: NGL-PC)
TEN-PE vs NGL-PC Comparison November 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 1.5B. In comparison, NGL-PC has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.82 on the NYSE, while NGL-PC trades at $25.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.62, whereas NGL-PC's P/E ratio is -8.87. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NGL-PC's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is more volatile compared to NGL-PC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check NGL-PC's competition here
NuStar Logistics, L.P. SB NT FX/FL 43 (NYSE: NSS)
TEN-PE vs NSS Comparison November 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 1.5B. In comparison, NSS has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.82 on the NYSE, while NSS trades at $25.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.62, whereas NSS's P/E ratio is -508.80. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NSS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is more volatile compared to NSS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check NSS's competition here
NGL Energy Partners LP (NYSE: NGL)
TEN-PE vs NGL Comparison November 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 1.5B. In comparison, NGL has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.82 on the NYSE, while NGL trades at $15.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.62, whereas NGL's P/E ratio is -5.49. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NGL's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to NGL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check NGL's competition here
Genesis Energy, L.P. (NYSE: GEL)
TEN-PE vs GEL Comparison November 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 1.5B. In comparison, GEL has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.82 on the NYSE, while GEL trades at $13.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.62, whereas GEL's P/E ratio is 71.89. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GEL's ROE of +1.41%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to GEL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check GEL's competition here
Global Partners LP (NYSE: GLP)
TEN-PE vs GLP Comparison November 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 1.5B. In comparison, GLP has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.82 on the NYSE, while GLP trades at $43.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.62, whereas GLP's P/E ratio is 8.82. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GLP's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to GLP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check GLP's competition here
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN)
TEN-PE vs TEN Comparison November 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 1.5B. In comparison, TEN has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.82 on the NYSE, while TEN trades at $46.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.62, whereas TEN's P/E ratio is 5.44. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TEN's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to TEN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check TEN's competition here
GasLog Ltd. (NYSE: GLOG-PA)
TEN-PE vs GLOG-PA Comparison November 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 1.5B. In comparison, GLOG-PA has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.82 on the NYSE, while GLOG-PA trades at $25.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.62, whereas GLOG-PA's P/E ratio is 44.93. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GLOG-PA's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is more volatile compared to GLOG-PA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check GLOG-PA's competition here
Permian Basin Royalty Trust (NYSE: PBT)
TEN-PE vs PBT Comparison November 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 1.5B. In comparison, PBT has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.82 on the NYSE, while PBT trades at $28.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.62, whereas PBT's P/E ratio is 81.66. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PBT's ROE of +99.89%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to PBT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check PBT's competition here
Teekay Corporation (NYSE: TK)
TEN-PE vs TK Comparison November 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 1.5B. In comparison, TK has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.82 on the NYSE, while TK trades at $13.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.62, whereas TK's P/E ratio is 6.46. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TK's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to TK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check TK's competition here
Global Partners LP (NYSE: GLP-PA)
TEN-PE vs GLP-PA Comparison November 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 1.5B. In comparison, GLP-PA has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.82 on the NYSE, while GLP-PA trades at $43.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.62, whereas GLP-PA's P/E ratio is 21.49. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GLP-PA's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to GLP-PA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check GLP-PA's competition here
Crestwood Equity Partners LP (NYSE: CEQP-P)
TEN-PE vs CEQP-P Comparison November 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 1.5B. In comparison, CEQP-P has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.82 on the NYSE, while CEQP-P trades at $9.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.62, whereas CEQP-P's P/E ratio is -12.22. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CEQP-P's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to CEQP-P. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check CEQP-P's competition here
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TNP-PE)
TEN-PE vs TNP-PE Comparison November 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 1.5B. In comparison, TNP-PE has a market cap of 991.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.82 on the NYSE, while TNP-PE trades at $78.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.62, whereas TNP-PE's P/E ratio is -8.23. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TNP-PE's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to TNP-PE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check TNP-PE's competition here
Sabine Royalty Trust (NYSE: SBR)
TEN-PE vs SBR Comparison November 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 1.5B. In comparison, SBR has a market cap of 986.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.82 on the NYSE, while SBR trades at $67.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.62, whereas SBR's P/E ratio is 14.43. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SBR's ROE of +9.62%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to SBR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check SBR's competition here
Global Partners LP (NYSE: GLP-PB)
TEN-PE vs GLP-PB Comparison November 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 1.5B. In comparison, GLP-PB has a market cap of 863M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.82 on the NYSE, while GLP-PB trades at $25.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.62, whereas GLP-PB's P/E ratio is 7.08. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GLP-PB's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is more volatile compared to GLP-PB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check GLP-PB's competition here
WhiteHawk Minerals Corp (NYSE: WHK)
TEN-PE vs WHK Comparison November 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 1.5B. In comparison, WHK has a market cap of 562M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.82 on the NYSE, while WHK trades at $24.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.62, whereas WHK's P/E ratio is -5.06. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.17%, compared to WHK's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to WHK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check WHK's competition here
New Fortress Energy Inc. Series A Mandatorily Convertible Preferred Stock (NASDAQ: NFEGP)
TEN-PE vs NFEGP Comparison November 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 1.5B. In comparison, NFEGP has a market cap of 552.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.82 on the NYSE, while NFEGP trades at $227.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.62, whereas NFEGP's P/E ratio is -0.66. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NFEGP's ROE of -17.38%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to NFEGP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check NFEGP's competition here
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TNP)
TEN-PE vs TNP Comparison November 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 1.5B. In comparison, TNP has a market cap of 539.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.82 on the NYSE, while TNP trades at $18.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.62, whereas TNP's P/E ratio is 3.69. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TNP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to TNP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check TNP's competition here
GasLog Partners LP (NYSE: GLOP-PB)
TEN-PE vs GLOP-PB Comparison November 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 1.5B. In comparison, GLOP-PB has a market cap of 415M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.82 on the NYSE, while GLOP-PB trades at $25.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.62, whereas GLOP-PB's P/E ratio is -58.55. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GLOP-PB's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to GLOP-PB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check GLOP-PB's competition here
GasLog Partners LP (NYSE: GLOP-PC)
TEN-PE vs GLOP-PC Comparison November 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 1.5B. In comparison, GLOP-PC has a market cap of 407.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.82 on the NYSE, while GLOP-PC trades at $25.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.62, whereas GLOP-PC's P/E ratio is 36.81. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GLOP-PC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to GLOP-PC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check GLOP-PC's competition here
Summit Midstream Partners, LP (NYSE: SMLP)
TEN-PE vs SMLP Comparison November 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 1.5B. In comparison, SMLP has a market cap of 405.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.82 on the NYSE, while SMLP trades at $38.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.62, whereas SMLP's P/E ratio is 5.30. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SMLP's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to SMLP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check SMLP's competition here
GasLog Partners LP (NYSE: GLOP-PA)
TEN-PE vs GLOP-PA Comparison November 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 1.5B. In comparison, GLOP-PA has a market cap of 401.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.82 on the NYSE, while GLOP-PA trades at $25.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.62, whereas GLOP-PA's P/E ratio is 36.27. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GLOP-PA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to GLOP-PA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check GLOP-PA's competition here
Summit Midstream Corp. (NYSE: SMC)
TEN-PE vs SMC Comparison November 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 1.5B. In comparison, SMC has a market cap of 398.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.82 on the NYSE, while SMC trades at $28.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.62, whereas SMC's P/E ratio is -26.04. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SMC's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to SMC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check SMC's competition here
Diamond S Shipping Inc. (NYSE: DSSI)
TEN-PE vs DSSI Comparison November 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 1.5B. In comparison, DSSI has a market cap of 384.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.82 on the NYSE, while DSSI trades at $9.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.62, whereas DSSI's P/E ratio is -6.99. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DSSI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to DSSI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check DSSI's competition here
Evolve Transition Infrastructure LP (AMEX: SNMP)
TEN-PE vs SNMP Comparison November 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 1.5B. In comparison, SNMP has a market cap of 338.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.82 on the NYSE, while SNMP trades at $1.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.62, whereas SNMP's P/E ratio is -3.91. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SNMP's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to SNMP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check SNMP's competition here
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TNP-PF)
TEN-PE vs TNP-PF Comparison November 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 1.5B. In comparison, TNP-PF has a market cap of 334.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.82 on the NYSE, while TNP-PF trades at $27.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.62, whereas TNP-PF's P/E ratio is -2.84. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TNP-PF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is similarly volatile compared to TNP-PF. This indicates similar risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check TNP-PF's competition here
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TNP-PD)
TEN-PE vs TNP-PD Comparison November 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 1.5B. In comparison, TNP-PD has a market cap of 321.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.82 on the NYSE, while TNP-PD trades at $25.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.62, whereas TNP-PD's P/E ratio is -2.65. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TNP-PD's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is more volatile compared to TNP-PD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check TNP-PD's competition here
Green Plains Partners LP (NASDAQ: GPP)
TEN-PE vs GPP Comparison November 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 1.5B. In comparison, GPP has a market cap of 286.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.82 on the NYSE, while GPP trades at $12.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.62, whereas GPP's P/E ratio is 7.60. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GPP's ROE of +26.63%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to GPP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check GPP's competition here
GasLog Partners LP (NYSE: GLOP)
TEN-PE vs GLOP Comparison November 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 1.5B. In comparison, GLOP has a market cap of 277.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.82 on the NYSE, while GLOP trades at $5.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.62, whereas GLOP's P/E ratio is 3.07. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GLOP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to GLOP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check GLOP's competition here
Brooge Energy Limited (NASDAQ: BROG)
TEN-PE vs BROG Comparison November 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 1.5B. In comparison, BROG has a market cap of 232.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.82 on the NYSE, while BROG trades at $2.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.62, whereas BROG's P/E ratio is 52.00. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BROG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to BROG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check BROG's competition here
Imperial Petroleum Inc. (NASDAQ: IMPPP)
TEN-PE vs IMPPP Comparison November 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 1.5B. In comparison, IMPPP has a market cap of 184.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.82 on the NYSE, while IMPPP trades at $25.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.62, whereas IMPPP's P/E ratio is 12.59. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.17%, compared to IMPPP's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to IMPPP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check IMPPP's competition here
Imperial Petroleum Inc. (NASDAQ: IMPP)
TEN-PE vs IMPP Comparison November 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 1.5B. In comparison, IMPP has a market cap of 173.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.82 on the NYSE, while IMPP trades at $4.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.62, whereas IMPP's P/E ratio is 2.30. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.17%, compared to IMPP's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to IMPP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check IMPP's competition here
Dynagas LNG Partners LP (NYSE: DLNG-PB)
TEN-PE vs DLNG-PB Comparison November 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 1.5B. In comparison, DLNG-PB has a market cap of 83.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.82 on the NYSE, while DLNG-PB trades at $25.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.62, whereas DLNG-PB's P/E ratio is 22.51. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DLNG-PB's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is more volatile compared to DLNG-PB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check DLNG-PB's competition here
Martin Midstream Partners L.P. (NASDAQ: MMLP)
TEN-PE vs MMLP Comparison November 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 1.5B. In comparison, MMLP has a market cap of 75.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.82 on the NYSE, while MMLP trades at $1.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.62, whereas MMLP's P/E ratio is -7.15. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MMLP's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to MMLP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check MMLP's competition here
New Fortress Energy Inc. (NASDAQ: NFE)
TEN-PE vs NFE Comparison November 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 1.5B. In comparison, NFE has a market cap of 23.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.82 on the NYSE, while NFE trades at $4.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.62, whereas NFE's P/E ratio is -0.82. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NFE's ROE of -17.38%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to NFE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check NFE's competition here
Robin Energy Ltd. Common Stock When Issued (NASDAQ: RBNEV)
TEN-PE vs RBNEV Comparison November 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 1.5B. In comparison, RBNEV has a market cap of 13.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.82 on the NYSE, while RBNEV trades at $5.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.62, whereas RBNEV's P/E ratio is -18.13. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.17%, compared to RBNEV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to RBNEV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check RBNEV's competition here
TMD Energy Limited (AMEX: TMDE)
TEN-PE vs TMDE Comparison November 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 1.5B. In comparison, TMDE has a market cap of 11.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.82 on the NYSE, while TMDE trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.62, whereas TMDE's P/E ratio is -0.91. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TMDE's ROE of -2.43%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to TMDE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check TMDE's competition here
Marine Petroleum Trust (NASDAQ: MARPS)
TEN-PE vs MARPS Comparison November 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 1.5B. In comparison, MARPS has a market cap of 8.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.82 on the NYSE, while MARPS trades at $4.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.62, whereas MARPS's P/E ratio is 12.97. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MARPS's ROE of +0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to MARPS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check MARPS's competition here
CBL International Limited (NASDAQ: BANL)
TEN-PE vs BANL Comparison November 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 1.5B. In comparison, BANL has a market cap of 6.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.82 on the NYSE, while BANL trades at $2.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.62, whereas BANL's P/E ratio is -65.26. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BANL's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to BANL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check BANL's competition here
Brooge Energy Limited (NASDAQ: BROGW)
TEN-PE vs BROGW Comparison November 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 1.5B. In comparison, BROGW has a market cap of 61.5K. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.82 on the NYSE, while BROGW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.62, whereas BROGW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BROGW's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to BROGW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check BROGW's competition here
Robin Energy Ltd. (NASDAQ: RBNE)
TEN-PE vs RBNE Comparison November 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 1.5B. In comparison, RBNE has a market cap of 24.3K. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.82 on the NYSE, while RBNE trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.62, whereas RBNE's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.17%, compared to RBNE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to RBNE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check RBNE's competition here
Spectra Energy Partners, LP (NYSE: SEP)
TEN-PE vs SEP Comparison November 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 1.5B. In comparison, SEP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.82 on the NYSE, while SEP trades at $35.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.62, whereas SEP's P/E ratio is 44.68. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SEP's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is more volatile compared to SEP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check SEP's competition here
Blueknight Energy Partners, L.P. (NASDAQ: BKEPP)
TEN-PE vs BKEPP Comparison November 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 1.5B. In comparison, BKEPP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.82 on the NYSE, while BKEPP trades at $8.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.62, whereas BKEPP's P/E ratio is 35.22. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BKEPP's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is more volatile compared to BKEPP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check BKEPP's competition here
BP Midstream Partners LP (NYSE: BPMP)
TEN-PE vs BPMP Comparison November 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 1.5B. In comparison, BPMP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.82 on the NYSE, while BPMP trades at $17.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.62, whereas BPMP's P/E ratio is 12.26. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BPMP's ROE of +1.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to BPMP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check BPMP's competition here
PBF Logistics LP (NYSE: PBFX)
TEN-PE vs PBFX Comparison November 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 1.5B. In comparison, PBFX has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.82 on the NYSE, while PBFX trades at $19.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.62, whereas PBFX's P/E ratio is 8.22. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PBFX's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to PBFX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check PBFX's competition here
EQGP Holdings, LP (NYSE: EQGP)
TEN-PE vs EQGP Comparison November 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 1.5B. In comparison, EQGP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.82 on the NYSE, while EQGP trades at $19.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.62, whereas EQGP's P/E ratio is 10.39. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.17%, compared to EQGP's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is more volatile compared to EQGP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check EQGP's competition here
Blueknight Energy Partners, L.P. (NASDAQ: BKEP)
TEN-PE vs BKEP Comparison November 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 1.5B. In comparison, BKEP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.82 on the NYSE, while BKEP trades at $4.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.62, whereas BKEP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BKEP's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is more volatile compared to BKEP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check BKEP's competition here
Enbridge Energy Management, L.L.C. (NYSE: EEQ)
TEN-PE vs EEQ Comparison November 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 1.5B. In comparison, EEQ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.82 on the NYSE, while EEQ trades at $10.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.62, whereas EEQ's P/E ratio is -38.89. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.17%, compared to EEQ's ROE of -32.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is more volatile compared to EEQ. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check EEQ's competition here
EnLink Midstream Partners, LP (NYSE: ENLK)
TEN-PE vs ENLK Comparison November 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ENLK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.82 on the NYSE, while ENLK trades at $12.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.62, whereas ENLK's P/E ratio is -25.64. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ENLK's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is more volatile compared to ENLK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check ENLK's competition here
Williams Partners L.P. (NYSE: WPZ)
TEN-PE vs WPZ Comparison November 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 1.5B. In comparison, WPZ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.82 on the NYSE, while WPZ trades at $47.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.62, whereas WPZ's P/E ratio is 37.61. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.17%, compared to WPZ's ROE of -290.33%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to WPZ. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check WPZ's competition here