Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See TEN-PE's competitors and their performance on the NYSE and across the wider stock market.
Peer Comparison Table: Marine Shipping Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more for TEN-PE and its NYSE peers.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TEN-PE | $25.89 | -0.12% | 528.3M | 5.87 | $4.41 | +10.94% |
| FRO | $46.12 | +1.54% | 10.3B | 6.90 | $6.68 | +6.80% |
| KEX | $140.77 | -1.74% | 7.5B | 21.65 | $6.50 | N/A |
| MATX | $225.59 | +1.49% | 6.8B | 15.08 | $14.96 | +0.65% |
| CMBT | $19.49 | +4.25% | 5.7B | 6.70 | $2.91 | +4.37% |
| INSW | $104.50 | +2.21% | 5.2B | 12.27 | $8.52 | +8.04% |
| HAFN | $9.22 | +3.25% | 4.6B | 6.98 | $1.32 | +8.55% |
| STNG | $82.35 | +2.80% | 4.1B | 10.91 | $7.54 | +2.16% |
| BWLP | $24.86 | +1.02% | 3.8B | 8.44 | $2.94 | +7.54% |
| SBLK | $32.42 | +1.73% | 3.6B | 12.01 | $2.70 | +5.82% |
Stock Comparison
Frontline Plc (NYSE: FRO)
TEN-PE vs FRO Comparison September 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 528.3M. In comparison, FRO has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.89 on the NYSE, while FRO trades at $46.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.87, whereas FRO's P/E ratio is 6.90. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FRO's ROE of +0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to FRO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check FRO's competition here
Kirby Corporation (NYSE: KEX)
TEN-PE vs KEX Comparison September 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 528.3M. In comparison, KEX has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.89 on the NYSE, while KEX trades at $140.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.87, whereas KEX's P/E ratio is 21.65. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KEX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to KEX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check KEX's competition here
Matson, Inc. (NYSE: MATX)
TEN-PE vs MATX Comparison September 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 528.3M. In comparison, MATX has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.89 on the NYSE, while MATX trades at $225.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.87, whereas MATX's P/E ratio is 15.08. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MATX's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to MATX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check MATX's competition here
Cmb.Tech N.V. (NYSE: CMBT)
TEN-PE vs CMBT Comparison September 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 528.3M. In comparison, CMBT has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.89 on the NYSE, while CMBT trades at $19.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.87, whereas CMBT's P/E ratio is 6.70. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CMBT's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to CMBT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check CMBT's competition here
International Seaways, Inc. (NYSE: INSW)
TEN-PE vs INSW Comparison September 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 528.3M. In comparison, INSW has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.89 on the NYSE, while INSW trades at $104.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.87, whereas INSW's P/E ratio is 12.27. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to INSW's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to INSW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check INSW's competition here
Hafnia Limited (NYSE: HAFN)
TEN-PE vs HAFN Comparison September 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 528.3M. In comparison, HAFN has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.89 on the NYSE, while HAFN trades at $9.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.87, whereas HAFN's P/E ratio is 6.98. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HAFN's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to HAFN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check HAFN's competition here
Scorpio Tankers Inc. (NYSE: STNG)
TEN-PE vs STNG Comparison September 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 528.3M. In comparison, STNG has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.89 on the NYSE, while STNG trades at $82.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.87, whereas STNG's P/E ratio is 10.91. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to STNG's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to STNG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check STNG's competition here
BW LPG Limited (NYSE: BWLP)
TEN-PE vs BWLP Comparison September 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 528.3M. In comparison, BWLP has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.89 on the NYSE, while BWLP trades at $24.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.87, whereas BWLP's P/E ratio is 8.44. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BWLP's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to BWLP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check BWLP's competition here
Star Bulk Carriers Corp. (NASDAQ: SBLK)
TEN-PE vs SBLK Comparison September 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 528.3M. In comparison, SBLK has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.89 on the NYSE, while SBLK trades at $32.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.87, whereas SBLK's P/E ratio is 12.01. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SBLK's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to SBLK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check SBLK's competition here
TORM plc (NASDAQ: TRMD)
TEN-PE vs TRMD Comparison September 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 528.3M. In comparison, TRMD has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.89 on the NYSE, while TRMD trades at $35.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.87, whereas TRMD's P/E ratio is 5.80. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TRMD's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to TRMD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check TRMD's competition here
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. (NYSE: ZIM)
TEN-PE vs ZIM Comparison September 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 528.3M. In comparison, ZIM has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.89 on the NYSE, while ZIM trades at $28.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.87, whereas ZIM's P/E ratio is -317.61. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ZIM's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to ZIM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check ZIM's competition here
DHT Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: DHT)
TEN-PE vs DHT Comparison September 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 528.3M. In comparison, DHT has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.89 on the NYSE, while DHT trades at $20.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.87, whereas DHT's P/E ratio is 7.15. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DHT's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to DHT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check DHT's competition here
Teekay Tankers Ltd. (NYSE: TNK)
TEN-PE vs TNK Comparison September 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 528.3M. In comparison, TNK has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.89 on the NYSE, while TNK trades at $93.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.87, whereas TNK's P/E ratio is 9.89. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TNK's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to TNK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check TNK's competition here
Danaos Corporation (NYSE: DAC)
TEN-PE vs DAC Comparison September 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 528.3M. In comparison, DAC has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.89 on the NYSE, while DAC trades at $155.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.87, whereas DAC's P/E ratio is 5.56. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DAC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to DAC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check DAC's competition here
Safe Bulkers, Inc. (NYSE: SB-PC)
TEN-PE vs SB-PC Comparison September 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 528.3M. In comparison, SB-PC has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.89 on the NYSE, while SB-PC trades at $26.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.87, whereas SB-PC's P/E ratio is 51.53. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SB-PC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is more volatile compared to SB-PC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check SB-PC's competition here
Safe Bulkers, Inc. (NYSE: SB-PD)
TEN-PE vs SB-PD Comparison September 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 528.3M. In comparison, SB-PD has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.89 on the NYSE, while SB-PD trades at $26.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.87, whereas SB-PD's P/E ratio is 51.34. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SB-PD's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is more volatile compared to SB-PD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check SB-PD's competition here
Navios Maritime Partners L.P. (NYSE: NMM)
TEN-PE vs NMM Comparison September 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 528.3M. In comparison, NMM has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.89 on the NYSE, while NMM trades at $92.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.87, whereas NMM's P/E ratio is 6.48. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NMM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to NMM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check NMM's competition here
Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp. (NYSE: ECO)
TEN-PE vs ECO Comparison September 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 528.3M. In comparison, ECO has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.89 on the NYSE, while ECO trades at $71.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.87, whereas ECO's P/E ratio is 6.62. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ECO's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to ECO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check ECO's competition here
Costamare Inc. (NYSE: CMRE-PC)
TEN-PE vs CMRE-PC Comparison September 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 528.3M. In comparison, CMRE-PC has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.89 on the NYSE, while CMRE-PC trades at $26.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.87, whereas CMRE-PC's P/E ratio is 9.61. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CMRE-PC's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to CMRE-PC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check CMRE-PC's competition here
Costamare Inc. (NYSE: CMRE)
TEN-PE vs CMRE Comparison September 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 528.3M. In comparison, CMRE has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.89 on the NYSE, while CMRE trades at $15.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.87, whereas CMRE's P/E ratio is 5.85. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CMRE's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to CMRE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check CMRE's competition here
SFL Corporation Ltd (NYSE: SFL)
TEN-PE vs SFL Comparison September 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 528.3M. In comparison, SFL has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.89 on the NYSE, while SFL trades at $12.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.87, whereas SFL's P/E ratio is 27.65. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SFL's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to SFL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check SFL's competition here
FLEX LNG Ltd (NYSE: FLNG)
TEN-PE vs FLNG Comparison September 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 528.3M. In comparison, FLNG has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.89 on the NYSE, while FLNG trades at $31.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.87, whereas FLNG's P/E ratio is 16.07. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FLNG's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to FLNG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check FLNG's competition here
Global Ship Lease, Inc. (NYSE: GSL)
TEN-PE vs GSL Comparison September 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 528.3M. In comparison, GSL has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.89 on the NYSE, while GSL trades at $46.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.87, whereas GSL's P/E ratio is 4.65. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GSL's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to GSL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check GSL's competition here
Nordic American Tankers Limited (NYSE: NAT)
TEN-PE vs NAT Comparison September 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 528.3M. In comparison, NAT has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.89 on the NYSE, while NAT trades at $7.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.87, whereas NAT's P/E ratio is 33.50. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NAT's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to NAT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check NAT's competition here
Global Ship Lease, Inc. (NYSE: GSL-PB)
TEN-PE vs GSL-PB Comparison September 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 528.3M. In comparison, GSL-PB has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.89 on the NYSE, while GSL-PB trades at $26.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.87, whereas GSL-PB's P/E ratio is 2.67. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GSL-PB's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to GSL-PB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check GSL-PB's competition here
Navigator Holdings Ltd. (NYSE: NVGS)
TEN-PE vs NVGS Comparison September 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 528.3M. In comparison, NVGS has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.89 on the NYSE, while NVGS trades at $22.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.87, whereas NVGS's P/E ratio is 11.32. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NVGS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to NVGS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check NVGS's competition here
Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp. (NASDAQ: CCEC)
TEN-PE vs CCEC Comparison September 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 528.3M. In comparison, CCEC has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.89 on the NYSE, while CCEC trades at $22.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.87, whereas CCEC's P/E ratio is 37.75. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CCEC's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to CCEC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check CCEC's competition here
Costamare Inc. (NYSE: CMRE-PD)
TEN-PE vs CMRE-PD Comparison September 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 528.3M. In comparison, CMRE-PD has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.89 on the NYSE, while CMRE-PD trades at $26.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.87, whereas CMRE-PD's P/E ratio is 9.62. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CMRE-PD's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is more volatile compared to CMRE-PD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check CMRE-PD's competition here
Costamare Inc. (NYSE: CMRE-PB)
TEN-PE vs CMRE-PB Comparison September 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 528.3M. In comparison, CMRE-PB has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.89 on the NYSE, while CMRE-PB trades at $25.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.87, whereas CMRE-PB's P/E ratio is 9.14. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CMRE-PB's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is more volatile compared to CMRE-PB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check CMRE-PB's competition here
Scorpio Tankers Inc. 7.00% Seni (NYSE: SBBA)
TEN-PE vs SBBA Comparison September 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 528.3M. In comparison, SBBA has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.89 on the NYSE, while SBBA trades at $25.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.87, whereas SBBA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SBBA's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is more volatile compared to SBBA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check SBBA's competition here
Genco Shipping & Trading Limited (NYSE: GNK)
TEN-PE vs GNK Comparison September 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 528.3M. In comparison, GNK has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.89 on the NYSE, while GNK trades at $27.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.87, whereas GNK's P/E ratio is 21.44. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GNK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to GNK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check GNK's competition here
Costamare Inc. (NYSE: CMRE-PE)
TEN-PE vs CMRE-PE Comparison September 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 528.3M. In comparison, CMRE-PE has a market cap of 983.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.89 on the NYSE, while CMRE-PE trades at $42.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.87, whereas CMRE-PE's P/E ratio is 11.47. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CMRE-PE's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to CMRE-PE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check CMRE-PE's competition here
Capital Product Partners L.P. (NASDAQ: CPLP)
TEN-PE vs CPLP Comparison September 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 528.3M. In comparison, CPLP has a market cap of 979.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.89 on the NYSE, while CPLP trades at $16.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.87, whereas CPLP's P/E ratio is 6.63. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CPLP's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to CPLP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check CPLP's competition here
Safe Bulkers, Inc. (NYSE: SB)
TEN-PE vs SB Comparison September 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 528.3M. In comparison, SB has a market cap of 934.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.89 on the NYSE, while SB trades at $9.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.87, whereas SB's P/E ratio is 20.39. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to SB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check SB's competition here
Himalaya Shipping Ltd. (NYSE: HSHP)
TEN-PE vs HSHP Comparison September 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 528.3M. In comparison, HSHP has a market cap of 864.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.89 on the NYSE, while HSHP trades at $18.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.87, whereas HSHP's P/E ratio is 16.23. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HSHP's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to HSHP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check HSHP's competition here
Ardmore Shipping Corporation (NYSE: ASC)
TEN-PE vs ASC Comparison September 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 528.3M. In comparison, ASC has a market cap of 740.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.89 on the NYSE, while ASC trades at $18.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.87, whereas ASC's P/E ratio is 7.73. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ASC's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to ASC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check ASC's competition here
Costamare Bulkers Holdings Limited (NYSE: CMDB)
TEN-PE vs CMDB Comparison September 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 528.3M. In comparison, CMDB has a market cap of 581.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.89 on the NYSE, while CMDB trades at $23.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.87, whereas CMDB's P/E ratio is 22.63. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CMDB's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to CMDB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check CMDB's competition here
Pangaea Logistics Solutions, Ltd. (NASDAQ: PANL)
TEN-PE vs PANL Comparison September 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 528.3M. In comparison, PANL has a market cap of 559.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.89 on the NYSE, while PANL trades at $8.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.87, whereas PANL's P/E ratio is 20.36. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PANL's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to PANL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check PANL's competition here
Euroseas Ltd. (NASDAQ: ESEA)
TEN-PE vs ESEA Comparison September 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 528.3M. In comparison, ESEA has a market cap of 538.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.89 on the NYSE, while ESEA trades at $76.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.87, whereas ESEA's P/E ratio is 4.45. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ESEA's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to ESEA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check ESEA's competition here
Cool Company Ltd. (NYSE: CLCO)
TEN-PE vs CLCO Comparison September 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 528.3M. In comparison, CLCO has a market cap of 511.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.89 on the NYSE, while CLCO trades at $9.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.87, whereas CLCO's P/E ratio is 9.21. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CLCO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to CLCO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check CLCO's competition here
Eneti Inc. (NYSE: NETI)
TEN-PE vs NETI Comparison September 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 528.3M. In comparison, NETI has a market cap of 437.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.89 on the NYSE, while NETI trades at $11.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.87, whereas NETI's P/E ratio is -11.44. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NETI's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to NETI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check NETI's competition here
Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. (NASDAQ: SHIP)
TEN-PE vs SHIP Comparison September 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 528.3M. In comparison, SHIP has a market cap of 399.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.89 on the NYSE, while SHIP trades at $18.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.87, whereas SHIP's P/E ratio is 8.76. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SHIP's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to SHIP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check SHIP's competition here
KNOT Offshore Partners LP (NYSE: KNOP)
TEN-PE vs KNOP Comparison September 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 528.3M. In comparison, KNOP has a market cap of 382.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.89 on the NYSE, while KNOP trades at $11.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.87, whereas KNOP's P/E ratio is 11.26. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KNOP's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to KNOP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check KNOP's competition here
Diana Shipping Inc. (NYSE: DSX)
TEN-PE vs DSX Comparison September 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 528.3M. In comparison, DSX has a market cap of 371.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.89 on the NYSE, while DSX trades at $3.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.87, whereas DSX's P/E ratio is 6.44. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DSX's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to DSX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check DSX's competition here
StealthGas Inc. (NASDAQ: GASS)
TEN-PE vs GASS Comparison September 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 528.3M. In comparison, GASS has a market cap of 345.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.89 on the NYSE, while GASS trades at $9.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.87, whereas GASS's P/E ratio is 5.77. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GASS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to GASS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check GASS's competition here
SEACOR Marine Holdings Inc. (NYSE: SMHI)
TEN-PE vs SMHI Comparison September 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 528.3M. In comparison, SMHI has a market cap of 264.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.89 on the NYSE, while SMHI trades at $9.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.87, whereas SMHI's P/E ratio is -13.75. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SMHI's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to SMHI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check SMHI's competition here
Toro Corp. (NASDAQ: TORO)
TEN-PE vs TORO Comparison September 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 528.3M. In comparison, TORO has a market cap of 219.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.89 on the NYSE, while TORO trades at $6.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.87, whereas TORO's P/E ratio is 139.67. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TORO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to TORO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check TORO's competition here
Euroseas Ltd. Ex-Distribution When Issued (NASDAQ: ESEAV)
TEN-PE vs ESEAV Comparison September 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 528.3M. In comparison, ESEAV has a market cap of 194.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.89 on the NYSE, while ESEAV trades at $27.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.87, whereas ESEAV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ESEAV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to ESEAV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check ESEAV's competition here
Diana Shipping Inc. (NYSE: DSX-PB)
TEN-PE vs DSX-PB Comparison September 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 528.3M. In comparison, DSX-PB has a market cap of 189.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.89 on the NYSE, while DSX-PB trades at $27.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.87, whereas DSX-PB's P/E ratio is 91.12. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DSX-PB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is more volatile compared to DSX-PB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check DSX-PB's competition here
OceanPal Inc. (NASDAQ: OP)
TEN-PE vs OP Comparison September 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 528.3M. In comparison, OP has a market cap of 187M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.89 on the NYSE, while OP trades at $6.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.87, whereas OP's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to OP's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to OP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check OP's competition here
EuroDry Ltd. (NASDAQ: EDRY)
TEN-PE vs EDRY Comparison September 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 528.3M. In comparison, EDRY has a market cap of 166M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.89 on the NYSE, while EDRY trades at $57.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.87, whereas EDRY's P/E ratio is 17.95. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EDRY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to EDRY. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check EDRY's competition here
Dynagas LNG Partners LP (NYSE: DLNG)
TEN-PE vs DLNG Comparison September 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 528.3M. In comparison, DLNG has a market cap of 133.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.89 on the NYSE, while DLNG trades at $3.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.87, whereas DLNG's P/E ratio is 2.96. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DLNG's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to DLNG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check DLNG's competition here
Dynagas LNG Partners LP (NYSE: DLNG-PA)
TEN-PE vs DLNG-PA Comparison September 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 528.3M. In comparison, DLNG-PA has a market cap of 130M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.89 on the NYSE, while DLNG-PA trades at $26.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.87, whereas DLNG-PA's P/E ratio is 21.52. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DLNG-PA's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to DLNG-PA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check DLNG-PA's competition here
Globus Maritime Limited (NASDAQ: GLBS)
TEN-PE vs GLBS Comparison September 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 528.3M. In comparison, GLBS has a market cap of 79.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.89 on the NYSE, while GLBS trades at $3.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.87, whereas GLBS's P/E ratio is 73.80. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GLBS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to GLBS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check GLBS's competition here
Heidmar Maritime Holdings Corp. (NASDAQ: HMR)
TEN-PE vs HMR Comparison September 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 528.3M. In comparison, HMR has a market cap of 78.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.89 on the NYSE, while HMR trades at $1.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.87, whereas HMR's P/E ratio is 33.25. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HMR's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to HMR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check HMR's competition here
Pyxis Tankers Inc. (NASDAQ: PXS)
TEN-PE vs PXS Comparison September 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 528.3M. In comparison, PXS has a market cap of 63.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.89 on the NYSE, while PXS trades at $6.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.87, whereas PXS's P/E ratio is 7.68. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PXS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to PXS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check PXS's competition here
Navios Maritime Holdings Inc. (NYSE: NM)
TEN-PE vs NM Comparison September 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 528.3M. In comparison, NM has a market cap of 51.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.89 on the NYSE, while NM trades at $2.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.87, whereas NM's P/E ratio is -3.39. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NM's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to NM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check NM's competition here
Navios Maritime Holdings Inc. (NYSE: NM-PH)
TEN-PE vs NM-PH Comparison September 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 528.3M. In comparison, NM-PH has a market cap of 51.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.89 on the NYSE, while NM-PH trades at $3.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.87, whereas NM-PH's P/E ratio is 0.58. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NM-PH's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is more volatile compared to NM-PH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check NM-PH's competition here
Pyxis Tankers Inc. (NASDAQ: PXSAP)
TEN-PE vs PXSAP Comparison September 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 528.3M. In comparison, PXSAP has a market cap of 46.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.89 on the NYSE, while PXSAP trades at $24.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.87, whereas PXSAP's P/E ratio is -16.95. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PXSAP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is more volatile compared to PXSAP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check PXSAP's competition here
Euroholdings Ltd (NASDAQ: EHLDV)
TEN-PE vs EHLDV Comparison September 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 528.3M. In comparison, EHLDV has a market cap of 44.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.89 on the NYSE, while EHLDV trades at $15.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.87, whereas EHLDV's P/E ratio is 224.29. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EHLDV's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to EHLDV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check EHLDV's competition here
Euroholdings Ltd. (NASDAQ: EHLD)
TEN-PE vs EHLD Comparison September 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 528.3M. In comparison, EHLD has a market cap of 32M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.89 on the NYSE, while EHLD trades at $11.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.87, whereas EHLD's P/E ratio is 3.38. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EHLD's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to EHLD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check EHLD's competition here
Navios Maritime Holdings Inc. (NYSE: NM-PG)
TEN-PE vs NM-PG Comparison September 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 528.3M. In comparison, NM-PG has a market cap of 31.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.89 on the NYSE, while NM-PG trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.87, whereas NM-PG's P/E ratio is 0.89. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NM-PG's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to NM-PG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check NM-PG's competition here
Toro Corp. Common Stock Ex-distribution When Issued (NASDAQ: TOROV)
TEN-PE vs TOROV Comparison September 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 528.3M. In comparison, TOROV has a market cap of 31.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.89 on the NYSE, while TOROV trades at $1.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.87, whereas TOROV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TOROV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to TOROV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check TOROV's competition here
United Maritime Corporation (NASDAQ: USEA)
TEN-PE vs USEA Comparison September 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 528.3M. In comparison, USEA has a market cap of 29M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.89 on the NYSE, while USEA trades at $3.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.87, whereas USEA's P/E ratio is 60.80. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to USEA's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to USEA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check USEA's competition here
Caravelle International Group (NASDAQ: CACO)
TEN-PE vs CACO Comparison September 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 528.3M. In comparison, CACO has a market cap of 24.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.89 on the NYSE, while CACO trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.87, whereas CACO's P/E ratio is -2.44. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CACO's ROE of -1.84%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to CACO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check CACO's competition here
Castor Maritime Inc. (NASDAQ: CTRM)
TEN-PE vs CTRM Comparison September 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 528.3M. In comparison, CTRM has a market cap of 23.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.89 on the NYSE, while CTRM trades at $2.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.87, whereas CTRM's P/E ratio is 0.50. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CTRM's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to CTRM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check CTRM's competition here
High-Trend International Group (NASDAQ: HTCO)
TEN-PE vs HTCO Comparison September 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 528.3M. In comparison, HTCO has a market cap of 21.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.89 on the NYSE, while HTCO trades at $2.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.87, whereas HTCO's P/E ratio is -0.61. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HTCO's ROE of -1.84%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to HTCO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check HTCO's competition here
Performance Shipping Inc. (NASDAQ: PSHG)
TEN-PE vs PSHG Comparison September 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 528.3M. In comparison, PSHG has a market cap of 21M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.89 on the NYSE, while PSHG trades at $1.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.87, whereas PSHG's P/E ratio is 2.17. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PSHG's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to PSHG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check PSHG's competition here
Uni-Fuels Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: UFG)
TEN-PE vs UFG Comparison September 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 528.3M. In comparison, UFG has a market cap of 19.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.89 on the NYSE, while UFG trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.87, whereas UFG's P/E ratio is -10.59. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to UFG's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to UFG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check UFG's competition here
Vantage Corp (AMEX: VNTG)
TEN-PE vs VNTG Comparison September 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 528.3M. In comparison, VNTG has a market cap of 18.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.89 on the NYSE, while VNTG trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.87, whereas VNTG's P/E ratio is 29.73. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VNTG's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to VNTG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check VNTG's competition here
SVRN, Inc. (NASDAQ: SVRN)
TEN-PE vs SVRN Comparison September 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 528.3M. In comparison, SVRN has a market cap of 17M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.89 on the NYSE, while SVRN trades at $9.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.87, whereas SVRN's P/E ratio is -0.40. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SVRN's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to SVRN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check SVRN's competition here
Rubico Inc. (NASDAQ: RUBI)
TEN-PE vs RUBI Comparison September 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 528.3M. In comparison, RUBI has a market cap of 5.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.89 on the NYSE, while RUBI trades at $1.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.87, whereas RUBI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RUBI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to RUBI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check RUBI's competition here
Top Ships Inc. (AMEX: TOPS)
TEN-PE vs TOPS Comparison September 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 528.3M. In comparison, TOPS has a market cap of 3.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.89 on the NYSE, while TOPS trades at $0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.87, whereas TOPS's P/E ratio is 1.09. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TOPS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to TOPS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check TOPS's competition here
Intercont (Cayman) Limited Ordinary shares (NASDAQ: NCT)
TEN-PE vs NCT Comparison September 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 528.3M. In comparison, NCT has a market cap of 409.7K. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.89 on the NYSE, while NCT trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.87, whereas NCT's P/E ratio is -0.16. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NCT's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to NCT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check NCT's competition here
C3is Inc. (NASDAQ: CISS)
TEN-PE vs CISS Comparison September 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 528.3M. In comparison, CISS has a market cap of 408.9K. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.89 on the NYSE, while CISS trades at $1.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.87, whereas CISS's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CISS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to CISS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check CISS's competition here
Icon Energy Corp. (NASDAQ: ICON)
TEN-PE vs ICON Comparison September 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 528.3M. In comparison, ICON has a market cap of 363K. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.89 on the NYSE, while ICON trades at $0.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.87, whereas ICON's P/E ratio is -0.52. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ICON's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to ICON. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check ICON's competition here
Pyxis Tankers Inc. (NASDAQ: PXSAW)
TEN-PE vs PXSAW Comparison September 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 528.3M. In comparison, PXSAW has a market cap of 217.1K. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.89 on the NYSE, while PXSAW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.87, whereas PXSAW's P/E ratio is 0.03. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PXSAW's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to PXSAW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check PXSAW's competition here
Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. (NASDAQ: SHIPW)
TEN-PE vs SHIPW Comparison September 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 528.3M. In comparison, SHIPW has a market cap of 75.6K. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.89 on the NYSE, while SHIPW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.87, whereas SHIPW's P/E ratio is 0.21. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SHIPW's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to SHIPW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check SHIPW's competition here
Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. (NASDAQ: SHIPZ)
TEN-PE vs SHIPZ Comparison September 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 528.3M. In comparison, SHIPZ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.89 on the NYSE, while SHIPZ trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.87, whereas SHIPZ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SHIPZ's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to SHIPZ. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check SHIPZ's competition here
Rand Logistics Inc (NASDAQ: RLOG)
TEN-PE vs RLOG Comparison September 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 528.3M. In comparison, RLOG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.89 on the NYSE, while RLOG trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.87, whereas RLOG's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RLOG's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to RLOG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check RLOG's competition here
Star Bulk Carriers Corp. 8.30% SR NT 22 (NASDAQ: SBLKZ)
TEN-PE vs SBLKZ Comparison September 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 528.3M. In comparison, SBLKZ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.89 on the NYSE, while SBLKZ trades at $25.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.87, whereas SBLKZ's P/E ratio is 104.92. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SBLKZ's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is more volatile compared to SBLKZ. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check SBLKZ's competition here
Global Ship Lease, Inc. 8.00% S (NYSE: GSLD)
TEN-PE vs GSLD Comparison September 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 528.3M. In comparison, GSLD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.89 on the NYSE, while GSLD trades at $25.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.87, whereas GSLD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GSLD's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is more volatile compared to GSLD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check GSLD's competition here
Gener8 Maritime, Inc. (NASDAQ: GNRT)
TEN-PE vs GNRT Comparison September 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 528.3M. In comparison, GNRT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.89 on the NYSE, while GNRT trades at $6.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.87, whereas GNRT's P/E ratio is -2.38. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GNRT's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to GNRT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check GNRT's competition here