Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See TEN-PE's competitors and their performance on the NYSE and across the wider stock market.
Peer Comparison Table: Marine Shipping Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more for TEN-PE and its NYSE peers.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TEN-PE | $26.35 | +0.17% | 537.7M | 5.98 | $4.41 | +10.94% |
| FRO | $41.21 | +1.70% | 9.2B | 10.08 | $4.09 | +7.57% |
| KEX | $138.62 | +0.78% | 7.4B | 21.31 | $6.50 | N/A |
| MATX | $217.30 | +1.66% | 6.6B | 14.52 | $14.96 | +0.68% |
| CMBT | $17.24 | +1.65% | 5B | 10.20 | $1.69 | +4.93% |
| INSW | $97.05 | +2.00% | 4.8B | 11.39 | $8.52 | +8.58% |
| STNG | $79.41 | +1.11% | 4B | 10.53 | $7.54 | +2.16% |
| HAFN | $7.74 | +1.71% | 3.9B | 8.50 | $0.91 | +9.40% |
| BWLP | $22.62 | +1.48% | 3.4B | 9.50 | $2.38 | +8.19% |
| ZIM | $28.14 | +4.92% | 3.4B | -312.78 | -$0.09 | +7.10% |
Stock Comparison
Frontline Plc (NYSE: FRO)
TEN-PE vs FRO Comparison August 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 537.7M. In comparison, FRO has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $26.35 on the NYSE, while FRO trades at $41.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.98, whereas FRO's P/E ratio is 10.08. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FRO's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to FRO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check FRO's competition here
Kirby Corporation (NYSE: KEX)
TEN-PE vs KEX Comparison August 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 537.7M. In comparison, KEX has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $26.35 on the NYSE, while KEX trades at $138.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.98, whereas KEX's P/E ratio is 21.31. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KEX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to KEX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check KEX's competition here
Matson, Inc. (NYSE: MATX)
TEN-PE vs MATX Comparison August 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 537.7M. In comparison, MATX has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $26.35 on the NYSE, while MATX trades at $217.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.98, whereas MATX's P/E ratio is 14.52. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MATX's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to MATX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check MATX's competition here
Cmb.Tech N.V. (NYSE: CMBT)
TEN-PE vs CMBT Comparison August 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 537.7M. In comparison, CMBT has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $26.35 on the NYSE, while CMBT trades at $17.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.98, whereas CMBT's P/E ratio is 10.20. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CMBT's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to CMBT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check CMBT's competition here
International Seaways, Inc. (NYSE: INSW)
TEN-PE vs INSW Comparison August 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 537.7M. In comparison, INSW has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $26.35 on the NYSE, while INSW trades at $97.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.98, whereas INSW's P/E ratio is 11.39. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to INSW's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to INSW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check INSW's competition here
Scorpio Tankers Inc. (NYSE: STNG)
TEN-PE vs STNG Comparison August 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 537.7M. In comparison, STNG has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $26.35 on the NYSE, while STNG trades at $79.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.98, whereas STNG's P/E ratio is 10.53. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to STNG's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to STNG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check STNG's competition here
Hafnia Limited (NYSE: HAFN)
TEN-PE vs HAFN Comparison August 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 537.7M. In comparison, HAFN has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $26.35 on the NYSE, while HAFN trades at $7.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.98, whereas HAFN's P/E ratio is 8.50. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HAFN's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to HAFN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check HAFN's competition here
BW LPG Limited (NYSE: BWLP)
TEN-PE vs BWLP Comparison August 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 537.7M. In comparison, BWLP has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $26.35 on the NYSE, while BWLP trades at $22.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.98, whereas BWLP's P/E ratio is 9.50. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BWLP's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to BWLP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check BWLP's competition here
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. (NYSE: ZIM)
TEN-PE vs ZIM Comparison August 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 537.7M. In comparison, ZIM has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $26.35 on the NYSE, while ZIM trades at $28.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.98, whereas ZIM's P/E ratio is -312.78. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ZIM's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to ZIM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check ZIM's competition here
Star Bulk Carriers Corp. (NASDAQ: SBLK)
TEN-PE vs SBLK Comparison August 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 537.7M. In comparison, SBLK has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $26.35 on the NYSE, while SBLK trades at $29.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.98, whereas SBLK's P/E ratio is 10.76. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SBLK's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to SBLK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check SBLK's competition here
DHT Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: DHT)
TEN-PE vs DHT Comparison August 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 537.7M. In comparison, DHT has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $26.35 on the NYSE, while DHT trades at $19.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.98, whereas DHT's P/E ratio is 6.68. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DHT's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to DHT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check DHT's competition here
Teekay Tankers Ltd. (NYSE: TNK)
TEN-PE vs TNK Comparison August 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 537.7M. In comparison, TNK has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $26.35 on the NYSE, while TNK trades at $85.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.98, whereas TNK's P/E ratio is 9.01. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TNK's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to TNK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check TNK's competition here
Safe Bulkers, Inc. (NYSE: SB-PC)
TEN-PE vs SB-PC Comparison August 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 537.7M. In comparison, SB-PC has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $26.35 on the NYSE, while SB-PC trades at $26.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.98, whereas SB-PC's P/E ratio is 51.92. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SB-PC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is more volatile compared to SB-PC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check SB-PC's competition here
Safe Bulkers, Inc. (NYSE: SB-PD)
TEN-PE vs SB-PD Comparison August 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 537.7M. In comparison, SB-PD has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $26.35 on the NYSE, while SB-PD trades at $26.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.98, whereas SB-PD's P/E ratio is 51.16. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SB-PD's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is more volatile compared to SB-PD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check SB-PD's competition here
Danaos Corporation (NYSE: DAC)
TEN-PE vs DAC Comparison August 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 537.7M. In comparison, DAC has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $26.35 on the NYSE, while DAC trades at $141.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.98, whereas DAC's P/E ratio is 5.03. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DAC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to DAC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check DAC's competition here
Navios Maritime Partners L.P. (NYSE: NMM)
TEN-PE vs NMM Comparison August 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 537.7M. In comparison, NMM has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $26.35 on the NYSE, while NMM trades at $81.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.98, whereas NMM's P/E ratio is 6.98. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NMM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to NMM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check NMM's competition here
Cadeler A/S (NYSE: CDLR)
TEN-PE vs CDLR Comparison August 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 537.7M. In comparison, CDLR has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $26.35 on the NYSE, while CDLR trades at $23.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.98, whereas CDLR's P/E ratio is 6.64. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CDLR's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to CDLR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check CDLR's competition here
Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp. (NYSE: ECO)
TEN-PE vs ECO Comparison August 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 537.7M. In comparison, ECO has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $26.35 on the NYSE, while ECO trades at $60.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.98, whereas ECO's P/E ratio is 5.59. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ECO's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to ECO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check ECO's competition here
Costamare Inc. (NYSE: CMRE-PC)
TEN-PE vs CMRE-PC Comparison August 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 537.7M. In comparison, CMRE-PC has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $26.35 on the NYSE, while CMRE-PC trades at $26.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.98, whereas CMRE-PC's P/E ratio is 9.59. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CMRE-PC's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is more volatile compared to CMRE-PC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check CMRE-PC's competition here
Costamare Inc. (NYSE: CMRE)
TEN-PE vs CMRE Comparison August 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 537.7M. In comparison, CMRE has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $26.35 on the NYSE, while CMRE trades at $14.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.98, whereas CMRE's P/E ratio is 5.50. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CMRE's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to CMRE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check CMRE's competition here
SFL Corporation Ltd (NYSE: SFL)
TEN-PE vs SFL Comparison August 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 537.7M. In comparison, SFL has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $26.35 on the NYSE, while SFL trades at $12.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.98, whereas SFL's P/E ratio is 588.38. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SFL's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to SFL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check SFL's competition here
Global Ship Lease, Inc. (NYSE: GSL-PB)
TEN-PE vs GSL-PB Comparison August 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 537.7M. In comparison, GSL-PB has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $26.35 on the NYSE, while GSL-PB trades at $26.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.98, whereas GSL-PB's P/E ratio is 2.67. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GSL-PB's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to GSL-PB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check GSL-PB's competition here
Global Ship Lease, Inc. (NYSE: GSL)
TEN-PE vs GSL Comparison August 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 537.7M. In comparison, GSL has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $26.35 on the NYSE, while GSL trades at $42.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.98, whereas GSL's P/E ratio is 4.23. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GSL's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to GSL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check GSL's competition here
Nordic American Tankers Limited (NYSE: NAT)
TEN-PE vs NAT Comparison August 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 537.7M. In comparison, NAT has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $26.35 on the NYSE, while NAT trades at $6.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.98, whereas NAT's P/E ratio is 31.04. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NAT's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to NAT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check NAT's competition here
Costamare Inc. (NYSE: CMRE-PD)
TEN-PE vs CMRE-PD Comparison August 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 537.7M. In comparison, CMRE-PD has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $26.35 on the NYSE, while CMRE-PD trades at $27.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.98, whereas CMRE-PD's P/E ratio is 9.80. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CMRE-PD's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is more volatile compared to CMRE-PD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check CMRE-PD's competition here
Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp. (NASDAQ: CCEC)
TEN-PE vs CCEC Comparison August 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 537.7M. In comparison, CCEC has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $26.35 on the NYSE, while CCEC trades at $22.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.98, whereas CCEC's P/E ratio is 37.68. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CCEC's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to CCEC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check CCEC's competition here
Costamare Inc. (NYSE: CMRE-PB)
TEN-PE vs CMRE-PB Comparison August 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 537.7M. In comparison, CMRE-PB has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $26.35 on the NYSE, while CMRE-PB trades at $25.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.98, whereas CMRE-PB's P/E ratio is 9.29. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CMRE-PB's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is more volatile compared to CMRE-PB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check CMRE-PB's competition here
Navigator Holdings Ltd. (NYSE: NVGS)
TEN-PE vs NVGS Comparison August 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 537.7M. In comparison, NVGS has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $26.35 on the NYSE, while NVGS trades at $21.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.98, whereas NVGS's P/E ratio is 10.34. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NVGS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to NVGS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check NVGS's competition here
Scorpio Tankers Inc. 7.00% Seni (NYSE: SBBA)
TEN-PE vs SBBA Comparison August 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 537.7M. In comparison, SBBA has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $26.35 on the NYSE, while SBBA trades at $25.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.98, whereas SBBA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SBBA's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is more volatile compared to SBBA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check SBBA's competition here
Genco Shipping & Trading Limited (NYSE: GNK)
TEN-PE vs GNK Comparison August 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 537.7M. In comparison, GNK has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $26.35 on the NYSE, while GNK trades at $26.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.98, whereas GNK's P/E ratio is 20.44. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GNK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to GNK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check GNK's competition here
Costamare Inc. (NYSE: CMRE-PE)
TEN-PE vs CMRE-PE Comparison August 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 537.7M. In comparison, CMRE-PE has a market cap of 983.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $26.35 on the NYSE, while CMRE-PE trades at $42.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.98, whereas CMRE-PE's P/E ratio is 11.47. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CMRE-PE's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to CMRE-PE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check CMRE-PE's competition here
Capital Product Partners L.P. (NASDAQ: CPLP)
TEN-PE vs CPLP Comparison August 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 537.7M. In comparison, CPLP has a market cap of 979.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $26.35 on the NYSE, while CPLP trades at $16.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.98, whereas CPLP's P/E ratio is 6.63. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CPLP's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to CPLP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check CPLP's competition here
Safe Bulkers, Inc. (NYSE: SB)
TEN-PE vs SB Comparison August 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 537.7M. In comparison, SB has a market cap of 789.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $26.35 on the NYSE, while SB trades at $7.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.98, whereas SB's P/E ratio is 17.23. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to SB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check SB's competition here
Himalaya Shipping Ltd. (NYSE: HSHP)
TEN-PE vs HSHP Comparison August 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 537.7M. In comparison, HSHP has a market cap of 760M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $26.35 on the NYSE, while HSHP trades at $16.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.98, whereas HSHP's P/E ratio is 25.59. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HSHP's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to HSHP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check HSHP's competition here
Ardmore Shipping Corporation (NYSE: ASC)
TEN-PE vs ASC Comparison August 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 537.7M. In comparison, ASC has a market cap of 718.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $26.35 on the NYSE, while ASC trades at $17.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.98, whereas ASC's P/E ratio is 7.49. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ASC's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to ASC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check ASC's competition here
Euroseas Ltd. (NASDAQ: ESEA)
TEN-PE vs ESEA Comparison August 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 537.7M. In comparison, ESEA has a market cap of 520.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $26.35 on the NYSE, while ESEA trades at $73.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.98, whereas ESEA's P/E ratio is 4.30. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ESEA's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to ESEA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check ESEA's competition here
Cool Company Ltd. (NYSE: CLCO)
TEN-PE vs CLCO Comparison August 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 537.7M. In comparison, CLCO has a market cap of 511.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $26.35 on the NYSE, while CLCO trades at $9.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.98, whereas CLCO's P/E ratio is 9.21. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CLCO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is more volatile compared to CLCO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check CLCO's competition here
Pangaea Logistics Solutions, Ltd. (NASDAQ: PANL)
TEN-PE vs PANL Comparison August 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 537.7M. In comparison, PANL has a market cap of 486.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $26.35 on the NYSE, while PANL trades at $7.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.98, whereas PANL's P/E ratio is 17.71. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PANL's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to PANL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check PANL's competition here
Costamare Bulkers Holdings Limited (NYSE: CMDB)
TEN-PE vs CMDB Comparison August 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 537.7M. In comparison, CMDB has a market cap of 443.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $26.35 on the NYSE, while CMDB trades at $18.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.98, whereas CMDB's P/E ratio is 17.26. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CMDB's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to CMDB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check CMDB's competition here
Eneti Inc. (NYSE: NETI)
TEN-PE vs NETI Comparison August 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 537.7M. In comparison, NETI has a market cap of 437.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $26.35 on the NYSE, while NETI trades at $11.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.98, whereas NETI's P/E ratio is -11.44. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NETI's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is similarly volatile compared to NETI. This indicates similar risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check NETI's competition here
GasLog Partners LP (NYSE: GLOP-PC)
TEN-PE vs GLOP-PC Comparison August 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 537.7M. In comparison, GLOP-PC has a market cap of 412.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $26.35 on the NYSE, while GLOP-PC trades at $25.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.98, whereas GLOP-PC's P/E ratio is 37.32. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GLOP-PC's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to GLOP-PC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check GLOP-PC's competition here
KNOT Offshore Partners LP (NYSE: KNOP)
TEN-PE vs KNOP Comparison August 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 537.7M. In comparison, KNOP has a market cap of 357.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $26.35 on the NYSE, while KNOP trades at $10.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.98, whereas KNOP's P/E ratio is 10.52. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KNOP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to KNOP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check KNOP's competition here
Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. (NASDAQ: SHIP)
TEN-PE vs SHIP Comparison August 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 537.7M. In comparison, SHIP has a market cap of 354.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $26.35 on the NYSE, while SHIP trades at $16.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.98, whereas SHIP's P/E ratio is 7.76. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SHIP's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to SHIP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check SHIP's competition here
StealthGas Inc. (NASDAQ: GASS)
TEN-PE vs GASS Comparison August 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 537.7M. In comparison, GASS has a market cap of 351.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $26.35 on the NYSE, while GASS trades at $9.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.98, whereas GASS's P/E ratio is 5.44. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GASS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to GASS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check GASS's competition here
Diana Shipping Inc. (NYSE: DSX)
TEN-PE vs DSX Comparison August 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 537.7M. In comparison, DSX has a market cap of 305.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $26.35 on the NYSE, while DSX trades at $2.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.98, whereas DSX's P/E ratio is 16.84. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DSX's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to DSX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check DSX's competition here
SEACOR Marine Holdings Inc. (NYSE: SMHI)
TEN-PE vs SMHI Comparison August 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 537.7M. In comparison, SMHI has a market cap of 267.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $26.35 on the NYSE, while SMHI trades at $9.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.98, whereas SMHI's P/E ratio is -7.76. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SMHI's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to SMHI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check SMHI's competition here
Toro Corp. (NASDAQ: TORO)
TEN-PE vs TORO Comparison August 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 537.7M. In comparison, TORO has a market cap of 195.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $26.35 on the NYSE, while TORO trades at $5.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.98, whereas TORO's P/E ratio is 124.18. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TORO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to TORO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check TORO's competition here
Euroseas Ltd. Ex-Distribution When Issued (NASDAQ: ESEAV)
TEN-PE vs ESEAV Comparison August 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 537.7M. In comparison, ESEAV has a market cap of 194.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $26.35 on the NYSE, while ESEAV trades at $27.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.98, whereas ESEAV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ESEAV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to ESEAV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check ESEAV's competition here
Diana Shipping Inc. (NYSE: DSX-PB)
TEN-PE vs DSX-PB Comparison August 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 537.7M. In comparison, DSX-PB has a market cap of 193.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $26.35 on the NYSE, while DSX-PB trades at $27.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.98, whereas DSX-PB's P/E ratio is 93.03. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DSX-PB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to DSX-PB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check DSX-PB's competition here
OceanPal Inc. (NASDAQ: OP)
TEN-PE vs OP Comparison August 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 537.7M. In comparison, OP has a market cap of 187M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $26.35 on the NYSE, while OP trades at $6.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.98, whereas OP's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to OP's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to OP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check OP's competition here
Dynagas LNG Partners LP (NYSE: DLNG)
TEN-PE vs DLNG Comparison August 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 537.7M. In comparison, DLNG has a market cap of 139.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $26.35 on the NYSE, while DLNG trades at $3.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.98, whereas DLNG's P/E ratio is 3.10. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DLNG's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to DLNG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check DLNG's competition here
Dynagas LNG Partners LP (NYSE: DLNG-PA)
TEN-PE vs DLNG-PA Comparison August 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 537.7M. In comparison, DLNG-PA has a market cap of 126.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $26.35 on the NYSE, while DLNG-PA trades at $26.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.98, whereas DLNG-PA's P/E ratio is 21.02. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DLNG-PA's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to DLNG-PA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check DLNG-PA's competition here
EuroDry Ltd. (NASDAQ: EDRY)
TEN-PE vs EDRY Comparison August 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 537.7M. In comparison, EDRY has a market cap of 105.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $26.35 on the NYSE, while EDRY trades at $36.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.98, whereas EDRY's P/E ratio is 11.43. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EDRY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to EDRY. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check EDRY's competition here
Heidmar Maritime Holdings Corp. (NASDAQ: HMR)
TEN-PE vs HMR Comparison August 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 537.7M. In comparison, HMR has a market cap of 83.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $26.35 on the NYSE, while HMR trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.98, whereas HMR's P/E ratio is 35.25. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HMR's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to HMR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check HMR's competition here
Globus Maritime Limited (NASDAQ: GLBS)
TEN-PE vs GLBS Comparison August 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 537.7M. In comparison, GLBS has a market cap of 78.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $26.35 on the NYSE, while GLBS trades at $3.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.98, whereas GLBS's P/E ratio is 72.80. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GLBS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to GLBS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check GLBS's competition here
Pyxis Tankers Inc. (NASDAQ: PXS)
TEN-PE vs PXS Comparison August 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 537.7M. In comparison, PXS has a market cap of 52.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $26.35 on the NYSE, while PXS trades at $5.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.98, whereas PXS's P/E ratio is 14.74. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PXS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to PXS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check PXS's competition here
Navios Maritime Holdings Inc. (NYSE: NM)
TEN-PE vs NM Comparison August 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 537.7M. In comparison, NM has a market cap of 51.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $26.35 on the NYSE, while NM trades at $2.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.98, whereas NM's P/E ratio is -3.39. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NM's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is more volatile compared to NM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check NM's competition here
Navios Maritime Holdings Inc. (NYSE: NM-PH)
TEN-PE vs NM-PH Comparison August 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 537.7M. In comparison, NM-PH has a market cap of 51.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $26.35 on the NYSE, while NM-PH trades at $3.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.98, whereas NM-PH's P/E ratio is 0.58. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NM-PH's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is more volatile compared to NM-PH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check NM-PH's competition here
Pyxis Tankers Inc. (NASDAQ: PXSAP)
TEN-PE vs PXSAP Comparison August 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 537.7M. In comparison, PXSAP has a market cap of 46.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $26.35 on the NYSE, while PXSAP trades at $24.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.98, whereas PXSAP's P/E ratio is -16.95. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PXSAP's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is more volatile compared to PXSAP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check PXSAP's competition here
Euroholdings Ltd (NASDAQ: EHLDV)
TEN-PE vs EHLDV Comparison August 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 537.7M. In comparison, EHLDV has a market cap of 44.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $26.35 on the NYSE, while EHLDV trades at $15.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.98, whereas EHLDV's P/E ratio is 224.29. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EHLDV's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to EHLDV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check EHLDV's competition here
Navios Maritime Holdings Inc. (NYSE: NM-PG)
TEN-PE vs NM-PG Comparison August 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 537.7M. In comparison, NM-PG has a market cap of 31.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $26.35 on the NYSE, while NM-PG trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.98, whereas NM-PG's P/E ratio is 0.89. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NM-PG's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to NM-PG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check NM-PG's competition here
Toro Corp. Common Stock Ex-distribution When Issued (NASDAQ: TOROV)
TEN-PE vs TOROV Comparison August 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 537.7M. In comparison, TOROV has a market cap of 31.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $26.35 on the NYSE, while TOROV trades at $1.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.98, whereas TOROV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TOROV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to TOROV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check TOROV's competition here
Euroholdings Ltd. (NASDAQ: EHLD)
TEN-PE vs EHLD Comparison August 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 537.7M. In comparison, EHLD has a market cap of 26.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $26.35 on the NYSE, while EHLD trades at $9.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.98, whereas EHLD's P/E ratio is 3.52. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EHLD's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to EHLD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check EHLD's competition here
United Maritime Corporation (NASDAQ: USEA)
TEN-PE vs USEA Comparison August 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 537.7M. In comparison, USEA has a market cap of 25.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $26.35 on the NYSE, while USEA trades at $2.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.98, whereas USEA's P/E ratio is 54.00. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to USEA's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to USEA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check USEA's competition here
High-Trend International Group (NASDAQ: HTCO)
TEN-PE vs HTCO Comparison August 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 537.7M. In comparison, HTCO has a market cap of 25M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $26.35 on the NYSE, while HTCO trades at $2.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.98, whereas HTCO's P/E ratio is -0.71. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HTCO's ROE of -1.84%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to HTCO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check HTCO's competition here
Caravelle International Group (NASDAQ: CACO)
TEN-PE vs CACO Comparison August 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 537.7M. In comparison, CACO has a market cap of 24.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $26.35 on the NYSE, while CACO trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.98, whereas CACO's P/E ratio is -2.44. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CACO's ROE of -1.84%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to CACO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check CACO's competition here
Performance Shipping Inc. (NASDAQ: PSHG)
TEN-PE vs PSHG Comparison August 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 537.7M. In comparison, PSHG has a market cap of 21.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $26.35 on the NYSE, while PSHG trades at $1.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.98, whereas PSHG's P/E ratio is 2.24. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PSHG's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to PSHG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check PSHG's competition here
Castor Maritime Inc. (NASDAQ: CTRM)
TEN-PE vs CTRM Comparison August 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 537.7M. In comparison, CTRM has a market cap of 21.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $26.35 on the NYSE, while CTRM trades at $2.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.98, whereas CTRM's P/E ratio is 0.47. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CTRM's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to CTRM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check CTRM's competition here
Vantage Corp (AMEX: VNTG)
TEN-PE vs VNTG Comparison August 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 537.7M. In comparison, VNTG has a market cap of 20.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $26.35 on the NYSE, while VNTG trades at $0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.98, whereas VNTG's P/E ratio is 32.99. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VNTG's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to VNTG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check VNTG's competition here
Uni-Fuels Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: UFG)
TEN-PE vs UFG Comparison August 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 537.7M. In comparison, UFG has a market cap of 18.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $26.35 on the NYSE, while UFG trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.98, whereas UFG's P/E ratio is -10.01. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to UFG's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to UFG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check UFG's competition here
Oceanpal Inc (NASDAQ: SVRN)
TEN-PE vs SVRN Comparison August 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 537.7M. In comparison, SVRN has a market cap of 13M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $26.35 on the NYSE, while SVRN trades at $6.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.98, whereas SVRN's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SVRN's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to SVRN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check SVRN's competition here
Rubico Inc. (NASDAQ: RUBI)
TEN-PE vs RUBI Comparison August 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 537.7M. In comparison, RUBI has a market cap of 6.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $26.35 on the NYSE, while RUBI trades at $1.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.98, whereas RUBI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RUBI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to RUBI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check RUBI's competition here
Top Ships Inc. (AMEX: TOPS)
TEN-PE vs TOPS Comparison August 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 537.7M. In comparison, TOPS has a market cap of 4.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $26.35 on the NYSE, while TOPS trades at $0.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.98, whereas TOPS's P/E ratio is 1.33. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TOPS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to TOPS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check TOPS's competition here
Intercont (Cayman) Limited Ordinary shares (NASDAQ: NCT)
TEN-PE vs NCT Comparison August 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 537.7M. In comparison, NCT has a market cap of 3.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $26.35 on the NYSE, while NCT trades at $3.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.98, whereas NCT's P/E ratio is -1.47. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NCT's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to NCT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check NCT's competition here
Icon Energy Corp. (NASDAQ: ICON)
TEN-PE vs ICON Comparison August 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 537.7M. In comparison, ICON has a market cap of 413.7K. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $26.35 on the NYSE, while ICON trades at $1.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.98, whereas ICON's P/E ratio is -0.59. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ICON's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to ICON. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check ICON's competition here
Pyxis Tankers Inc. (NASDAQ: PXSAW)
TEN-PE vs PXSAW Comparison August 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 537.7M. In comparison, PXSAW has a market cap of 217.1K. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $26.35 on the NYSE, while PXSAW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.98, whereas PXSAW's P/E ratio is 0.03. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PXSAW's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to PXSAW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check PXSAW's competition here
Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. (NASDAQ: SHIPW)
TEN-PE vs SHIPW Comparison August 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 537.7M. In comparison, SHIPW has a market cap of 75.6K. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $26.35 on the NYSE, while SHIPW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.98, whereas SHIPW's P/E ratio is 0.21. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SHIPW's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to SHIPW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check SHIPW's competition here
C3is Inc. (NASDAQ: CISS)
TEN-PE vs CISS Comparison August 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 537.7M. In comparison, CISS has a market cap of 13.6K. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $26.35 on the NYSE, while CISS trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.98, whereas CISS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CISS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to CISS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check CISS's competition here
Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. (NASDAQ: SHIPZ)
TEN-PE vs SHIPZ Comparison August 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 537.7M. In comparison, SHIPZ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $26.35 on the NYSE, while SHIPZ trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.98, whereas SHIPZ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SHIPZ's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to SHIPZ. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check SHIPZ's competition here
Gener8 Maritime, Inc. (NASDAQ: GNRT)
TEN-PE vs GNRT Comparison August 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 537.7M. In comparison, GNRT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $26.35 on the NYSE, while GNRT trades at $6.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.98, whereas GNRT's P/E ratio is -2.38. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GNRT's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to GNRT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check GNRT's competition here
Rand Logistics Inc (NASDAQ: RLOG)
TEN-PE vs RLOG Comparison August 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 537.7M. In comparison, RLOG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $26.35 on the NYSE, while RLOG trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.98, whereas RLOG's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RLOG's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to RLOG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check RLOG's competition here
Star Bulk Carriers Corp. 8.30% SR NT 22 (NASDAQ: SBLKZ)
TEN-PE vs SBLKZ Comparison August 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 537.7M. In comparison, SBLKZ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $26.35 on the NYSE, while SBLKZ trades at $25.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.98, whereas SBLKZ's P/E ratio is 104.92. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SBLKZ's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is more volatile compared to SBLKZ. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check SBLKZ's competition here
Global Ship Lease, Inc. 8.00% S (NYSE: GSLD)
TEN-PE vs GSLD Comparison August 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 537.7M. In comparison, GSLD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $26.35 on the NYSE, while GSLD trades at $25.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.98, whereas GSLD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GSLD's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is more volatile compared to GSLD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check GSLD's competition here