Antero Midstream Corporation (AM) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (AM) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Oil & Gas Midstream Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AM | $22.59 | -1.14% | 10.7B | 26.27 | $0.86 | +3.99% |
| ET-PE | $81.43 | +4.82% | 170.2B | 75.82 | $1.07 | +6.57% |
| ENB | $56.71 | +0.44% | 123.8B | 26.50 | $2.14 | +4.90% |
| EP-PC | $50.43 | -0.41% | 112.1B | 28.40 | $1.78 | +4.71% |
| WMB | $73.38 | -1.81% | 89.7B | 32.90 | $2.23 | +2.80% |
| EPD | $38.20 | +0.53% | 82.6B | 14.14 | $2.70 | +5.70% |
| TRP | $69.76 | -0.20% | 72.7B | 27.15 | $2.57 | +3.56% |
| KMI | $32.30 | -0.74% | 71.9B | 22.43 | $1.44 | +3.64% |
| ET | $20.32 | +0.59% | 69.9B | 16.92 | $1.20 | +6.57% |
| ET-PI | $11.52 | -0.86% | 68.3B | 9.38 | $1.23 | +6.57% |
Stock Comparison
AM vs ET-PE Comparison July 2026
AM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AM stands at 10.7B. In comparison, ET-PE has a market cap of 170.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AM is priced at $22.59, while ET-PE trades at $81.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AM currently has a P/E ratio of 26.27, whereas ET-PE's P/E ratio is 75.82. In terms of profitability, AM's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ET-PE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AM is less volatile compared to ET-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AM.Check ET-PE's competition here
AM vs ENB Comparison July 2026
AM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AM stands at 10.7B. In comparison, ENB has a market cap of 123.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AM is priced at $22.59, while ENB trades at $56.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AM currently has a P/E ratio of 26.27, whereas ENB's P/E ratio is 26.50. In terms of profitability, AM's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ENB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AM is more volatile compared to ENB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AM.Check ENB's competition here
AM vs EP-PC Comparison July 2026
AM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AM stands at 10.7B. In comparison, EP-PC has a market cap of 112.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AM is priced at $22.59, while EP-PC trades at $50.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AM currently has a P/E ratio of 26.27, whereas EP-PC's P/E ratio is 28.40. In terms of profitability, AM's ROE is +0.20%, compared to EP-PC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AM is more volatile compared to EP-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AM.Check EP-PC's competition here
AM vs WMB Comparison July 2026
AM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AM stands at 10.7B. In comparison, WMB has a market cap of 89.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AM is priced at $22.59, while WMB trades at $73.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AM currently has a P/E ratio of 26.27, whereas WMB's P/E ratio is 32.90. In terms of profitability, AM's ROE is +0.20%, compared to WMB's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, AM is less volatile compared to WMB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AM.Check WMB's competition here
AM vs EPD Comparison July 2026
AM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AM stands at 10.7B. In comparison, EPD has a market cap of 82.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AM is priced at $22.59, while EPD trades at $38.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AM currently has a P/E ratio of 26.27, whereas EPD's P/E ratio is 14.14. In terms of profitability, AM's ROE is +0.20%, compared to EPD's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, AM is more volatile compared to EPD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AM.Check EPD's competition here
AM vs TRP Comparison July 2026
AM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AM stands at 10.7B. In comparison, TRP has a market cap of 72.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AM is priced at $22.59, while TRP trades at $69.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AM currently has a P/E ratio of 26.27, whereas TRP's P/E ratio is 27.15. In terms of profitability, AM's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TRP's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AM is more volatile compared to TRP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AM.Check TRP's competition here
AM vs KMI Comparison July 2026
AM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AM stands at 10.7B. In comparison, KMI has a market cap of 71.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AM is priced at $22.59, while KMI trades at $32.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AM currently has a P/E ratio of 26.27, whereas KMI's P/E ratio is 22.43. In terms of profitability, AM's ROE is +0.20%, compared to KMI's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AM is less volatile compared to KMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AM.Check KMI's competition here
AM vs ET Comparison July 2026
AM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AM stands at 10.7B. In comparison, ET has a market cap of 69.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AM is priced at $22.59, while ET trades at $20.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AM currently has a P/E ratio of 26.27, whereas ET's P/E ratio is 16.92. In terms of profitability, AM's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ET's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AM is more volatile compared to ET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AM.Check ET's competition here
AM vs ET-PI Comparison July 2026
AM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AM stands at 10.7B. In comparison, ET-PI has a market cap of 68.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AM is priced at $22.59, while ET-PI trades at $11.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AM currently has a P/E ratio of 26.27, whereas ET-PI's P/E ratio is 9.38. In terms of profitability, AM's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ET-PI's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AM is more volatile compared to ET-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AM.Check ET-PI's competition here
AM vs TRGP Comparison July 2026
AM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AM stands at 10.7B. In comparison, TRGP has a market cap of 60.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AM is priced at $22.59, while TRGP trades at $282.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AM currently has a P/E ratio of 26.27, whereas TRGP's P/E ratio is 28.91. In terms of profitability, AM's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TRGP's ROE of +0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, AM is more volatile compared to TRGP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AM.Check TRGP's competition here
AM vs OKE Comparison July 2026
AM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AM stands at 10.7B. In comparison, OKE has a market cap of 58.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AM is priced at $22.59, while OKE trades at $93.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AM currently has a P/E ratio of 26.27, whereas OKE's P/E ratio is 16.67. In terms of profitability, AM's ROE is +0.20%, compared to OKE's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, AM is more volatile compared to OKE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AM.Check OKE's competition here
AM vs MPLX Comparison July 2026
AM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AM stands at 10.7B. In comparison, MPLX has a market cap of 57.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AM is priced at $22.59, while MPLX trades at $57.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AM currently has a P/E ratio of 26.27, whereas MPLX's P/E ratio is 12.36. In terms of profitability, AM's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MPLX's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, AM is more volatile compared to MPLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AM.Check MPLX's competition here
AM vs LNG Comparison July 2026
AM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AM stands at 10.7B. In comparison, LNG has a market cap of 55B. Regarding current trading prices, AM is priced at $22.59, while LNG trades at $262.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AM currently has a P/E ratio of 26.27, whereas LNG's P/E ratio is 42.98. In terms of profitability, AM's ROE is +0.20%, compared to LNG's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, AM is more volatile compared to LNG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AM.Check LNG's competition here
AM vs ET-PC Comparison July 2026
AM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AM stands at 10.7B. In comparison, ET-PC has a market cap of 50.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AM is priced at $22.59, while ET-PC trades at $25.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AM currently has a P/E ratio of 26.27, whereas ET-PC's P/E ratio is 23.81. In terms of profitability, AM's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ET-PC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AM is more volatile compared to ET-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AM.Check ET-PC's competition here
AM vs ET-PD Comparison July 2026
AM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AM stands at 10.7B. In comparison, ET-PD has a market cap of 50.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AM is priced at $22.59, while ET-PD trades at $25.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AM currently has a P/E ratio of 26.27, whereas ET-PD's P/E ratio is 23.81. In terms of profitability, AM's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ET-PD's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AM is more volatile compared to ET-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AM.Check ET-PD's competition here
AM vs ENBA Comparison July 2026
AM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AM stands at 10.7B. In comparison, ENBA has a market cap of 41.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AM is priced at $22.59, while ENBA trades at $25.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AM currently has a P/E ratio of 26.27, whereas ENBA's P/E ratio is 24.08. In terms of profitability, AM's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ENBA's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, AM is more volatile compared to ENBA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AM.Check ENBA's competition here
AM vs VG Comparison July 2026
AM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AM stands at 10.7B. In comparison, VG has a market cap of 33.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AM is priced at $22.59, while VG trades at $13.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AM currently has a P/E ratio of 26.27, whereas VG's P/E ratio is 15.32. In terms of profitability, AM's ROE is +0.20%, compared to VG's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, AM is less volatile compared to VG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AM.Check VG's competition here
AM vs MPLXP Comparison July 2026
AM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AM stands at 10.7B. In comparison, MPLXP has a market cap of 33.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AM is priced at $22.59, while MPLXP trades at $33.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AM currently has a P/E ratio of 26.27, whereas MPLXP's P/E ratio is 11.29. In terms of profitability, AM's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MPLXP's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, AM is more volatile compared to MPLXP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AM.Check MPLXP's competition here
AM vs CQP Comparison July 2026
AM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AM stands at 10.7B. In comparison, CQP has a market cap of 30.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AM is priced at $22.59, while CQP trades at $62.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AM currently has a P/E ratio of 26.27, whereas CQP's P/E ratio is 11.70. In terms of profitability, AM's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CQP's ROE of +0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, AM is less volatile compared to CQP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AM.Check CQP's competition here
AM vs PBA Comparison July 2026
AM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AM stands at 10.7B. In comparison, PBA has a market cap of 29.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AM is priced at $22.59, while PBA trades at $51.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AM currently has a P/E ratio of 26.27, whereas PBA's P/E ratio is 26.58. In terms of profitability, AM's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PBA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AM is more volatile compared to PBA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AM.Check PBA's competition here
AM vs TCPA Comparison July 2026
AM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AM stands at 10.7B. In comparison, TCPA has a market cap of 23.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AM is priced at $22.59, while TCPA trades at $23.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AM currently has a P/E ratio of 26.27, whereas TCPA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AM's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TCPA's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AM is more volatile compared to TCPA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AM.Check TCPA's competition here
AM vs WES Comparison July 2026
AM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AM stands at 10.7B. In comparison, WES has a market cap of 19B. Regarding current trading prices, AM is priced at $22.59, while WES trades at $45.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AM currently has a P/E ratio of 26.27, whereas WES's P/E ratio is 15.03. In terms of profitability, AM's ROE is +0.20%, compared to WES's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, AM is more volatile compared to WES. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AM.Check WES's competition here
AM vs PAA Comparison July 2026
AM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AM stands at 10.7B. In comparison, PAA has a market cap of 16.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AM is priced at $22.59, while PAA trades at $23.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AM currently has a P/E ratio of 26.27, whereas PAA's P/E ratio is 15.50. In terms of profitability, AM's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PAA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AM is more volatile compared to PAA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AM.Check PAA's competition here
AM vs VNOM Comparison July 2026
AM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AM stands at 10.7B. In comparison, VNOM has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, AM is priced at $22.59, while VNOM trades at $44.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AM currently has a P/E ratio of 26.27, whereas VNOM's P/E ratio is 26.57. In terms of profitability, AM's ROE is +0.20%, compared to VNOM's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AM is more volatile compared to VNOM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AM.Check VNOM's competition here
AM vs DTM Comparison July 2026
AM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AM stands at 10.7B. In comparison, DTM has a market cap of 14.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AM is priced at $22.59, while DTM trades at $145.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AM currently has a P/E ratio of 26.27, whereas DTM's P/E ratio is 32.09. In terms of profitability, AM's ROE is +0.20%, compared to DTM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AM is less volatile compared to DTM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AM.Check DTM's competition here
AM vs MMP Comparison July 2026
AM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AM stands at 10.7B. In comparison, MMP has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AM is priced at $22.59, while MMP trades at $69.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AM currently has a P/E ratio of 26.27, whereas MMP's P/E ratio is 13.80. In terms of profitability, AM's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MMP's ROE of -8.33%. Regarding short-term risk, AM is more volatile compared to MMP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AM.Check MMP's competition here
AM vs DCP Comparison July 2026
AM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AM stands at 10.7B. In comparison, DCP has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AM is priced at $22.59, while DCP trades at $41.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AM currently has a P/E ratio of 26.27, whereas DCP's P/E ratio is 7.75. In terms of profitability, AM's ROE is +0.20%, compared to DCP's ROE of -351.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AM is more volatile compared to DCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AM.Check DCP's competition here
AM vs HESM Comparison July 2026
AM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AM stands at 10.7B. In comparison, HESM has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AM is priced at $22.59, while HESM trades at $40.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AM currently has a P/E ratio of 26.27, whereas HESM's P/E ratio is 13.96. In terms of profitability, AM's ROE is +0.20%, compared to HESM's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, AM is more volatile compared to HESM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AM.Check HESM's competition here
AM vs SOBO Comparison July 2026
AM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AM stands at 10.7B. In comparison, SOBO has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AM is priced at $22.59, while SOBO trades at $37.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AM currently has a P/E ratio of 26.27, whereas SOBO's P/E ratio is 19.51. In terms of profitability, AM's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SOBO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, AM is more volatile compared to SOBO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AM.Check SOBO's competition here
AM vs DCP-PC Comparison July 2026
AM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AM stands at 10.7B. In comparison, DCP-PC has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AM is priced at $22.59, while DCP-PC trades at $25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AM currently has a P/E ratio of 26.27, whereas DCP-PC's P/E ratio is 57.73. In terms of profitability, AM's ROE is +0.20%, compared to DCP-PC's ROE of -351.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AM is more volatile compared to DCP-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AM.Check DCP-PC's competition here
AM vs ENLC Comparison July 2026
AM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AM stands at 10.7B. In comparison, ENLC has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AM is priced at $22.59, while ENLC trades at $14.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AM currently has a P/E ratio of 26.27, whereas ENLC's P/E ratio is 64.18. In terms of profitability, AM's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ENLC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AM is more volatile compared to ENLC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AM.Check ENLC's competition here
AM vs ETRN Comparison July 2026
AM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AM stands at 10.7B. In comparison, ETRN has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AM is priced at $22.59, while ETRN trades at $12.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AM currently has a P/E ratio of 26.27, whereas ETRN's P/E ratio is 13.80. In terms of profitability, AM's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ETRN's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, AM is less volatile compared to ETRN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AM.Check ETRN's competition here
AM vs PAGP Comparison July 2026
AM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AM stands at 10.7B. In comparison, PAGP has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AM is priced at $22.59, while PAGP trades at $25.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AM currently has a P/E ratio of 26.27, whereas PAGP's P/E ratio is 33.26. In terms of profitability, AM's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PAGP's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AM is more volatile compared to PAGP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AM.Check PAGP's competition here
AM vs GLNG Comparison July 2026
AM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AM stands at 10.7B. In comparison, GLNG has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AM is priced at $22.59, while GLNG trades at $49.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AM currently has a P/E ratio of 26.27, whereas GLNG's P/E ratio is 33.55. In terms of profitability, AM's ROE is +0.20%, compared to GLNG's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AM is more volatile compared to GLNG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AM.Check GLNG's competition here
AM vs INSW Comparison July 2026
AM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AM stands at 10.7B. In comparison, INSW has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AM is priced at $22.59, while INSW trades at $86.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AM currently has a P/E ratio of 26.27, whereas INSW's P/E ratio is 10.36. In terms of profitability, AM's ROE is +0.20%, compared to INSW's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, AM is less volatile compared to INSW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AM.Check INSW's competition here
AM vs KNTK Comparison July 2026
AM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AM stands at 10.7B. In comparison, KNTK has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AM is priced at $22.59, while KNTK trades at $50.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AM currently has a P/E ratio of 26.27, whereas KNTK's P/E ratio is 18.97. In terms of profitability, AM's ROE is +0.20%, compared to KNTK's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, AM is more volatile compared to KNTK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AM.Check KNTK's competition here
AM vs EURN Comparison July 2026
AM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AM stands at 10.7B. In comparison, EURN has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AM is priced at $22.59, while EURN trades at $16.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AM currently has a P/E ratio of 26.27, whereas EURN's P/E ratio is 2.87. In terms of profitability, AM's ROE is +0.20%, compared to EURN's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, AM is less volatile compared to EURN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AM.Check EURN's competition here
AM vs SUNC Comparison July 2026
AM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AM stands at 10.7B. In comparison, SUNC has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AM is priced at $22.59, while SUNC trades at $74.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AM currently has a P/E ratio of 26.27, whereas SUNC's P/E ratio is 16.40. In terms of profitability, AM's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SUNC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AM is more volatile compared to SUNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AM.Check SUNC's competition here
AM vs CEQP Comparison July 2026
AM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AM stands at 10.7B. In comparison, CEQP has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, AM is priced at $22.59, while CEQP trades at $28.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AM currently has a P/E ratio of 26.27, whereas CEQP's P/E ratio is 21.91. In terms of profitability, AM's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CEQP's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AM is less volatile compared to CEQP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AM.Check CEQP's competition here
AM vs TRMD Comparison July 2026
AM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AM stands at 10.7B. In comparison, TRMD has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AM is priced at $22.59, while TRMD trades at $28.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AM currently has a P/E ratio of 26.27, whereas TRMD's P/E ratio is 8.37. In terms of profitability, AM's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TRMD's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, AM is more volatile compared to TRMD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AM.Check TRMD's competition here
AM vs DKL Comparison July 2026
AM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AM stands at 10.7B. In comparison, DKL has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AM is priced at $22.59, while DKL trades at $54.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AM currently has a P/E ratio of 26.27, whereas DKL's P/E ratio is 17.30. In terms of profitability, AM's ROE is +0.20%, compared to DKL's ROE of +19.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AM is less volatile compared to DKL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AM.Check DKL's competition here
AM vs NS Comparison July 2026
AM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AM stands at 10.7B. In comparison, NS has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AM is priced at $22.59, while NS trades at $21.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AM currently has a P/E ratio of 26.27, whereas NS's P/E ratio is 84.46. In terms of profitability, AM's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, AM is less volatile compared to NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AM.Check NS's competition here
AM vs NS-PB Comparison July 2026
AM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AM stands at 10.7B. In comparison, NS-PB has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AM is priced at $22.59, while NS-PB trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AM currently has a P/E ratio of 26.27, whereas NS-PB's P/E ratio is -19.83. In terms of profitability, AM's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NS-PB's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, AM is more volatile compared to NS-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AM.Check NS-PB's competition here
AM vs NS-PA Comparison July 2026
AM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AM stands at 10.7B. In comparison, NS-PA has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AM is priced at $22.59, while NS-PA trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AM currently has a P/E ratio of 26.27, whereas NS-PA's P/E ratio is -8.66. In terms of profitability, AM's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NS-PA's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, AM is more volatile compared to NS-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AM.Check NS-PA's competition here
AM vs HEP Comparison July 2026
AM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AM stands at 10.7B. In comparison, HEP has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AM is priced at $22.59, while HEP trades at $20.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AM currently has a P/E ratio of 26.27, whereas HEP's P/E ratio is 10.76. In terms of profitability, AM's ROE is +0.20%, compared to HEP's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, AM is less volatile compared to HEP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AM.Check HEP's competition here
AM vs SEAL-PA Comparison July 2026
AM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AM stands at 10.7B. In comparison, SEAL-PA has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AM is priced at $22.59, while SEAL-PA trades at $25.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AM currently has a P/E ratio of 26.27, whereas SEAL-PA's P/E ratio is 94.31. In terms of profitability, AM's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SEAL-PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AM is more volatile compared to SEAL-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AM.Check SEAL-PA's competition here
AM vs SEAL-PB Comparison July 2026
AM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AM stands at 10.7B. In comparison, SEAL-PB has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AM is priced at $22.59, while SEAL-PB trades at $25.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AM currently has a P/E ratio of 26.27, whereas SEAL-PB's P/E ratio is 69.82. In terms of profitability, AM's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SEAL-PB's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AM is more volatile compared to SEAL-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AM.Check SEAL-PB's competition here
AM vs NS-PC Comparison July 2026
AM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AM stands at 10.7B. In comparison, NS-PC has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AM is priced at $22.59, while NS-PC trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AM currently has a P/E ratio of 26.27, whereas NS-PC's P/E ratio is 20.10. In terms of profitability, AM's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NS-PC's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, AM is more volatile compared to NS-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AM.Check NS-PC's competition here
AM vs RTLR Comparison July 2026
AM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AM stands at 10.7B. In comparison, RTLR has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AM is priced at $22.59, while RTLR trades at $15.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AM currently has a P/E ratio of 26.27, whereas RTLR's P/E ratio is 16.37. In terms of profitability, AM's ROE is +0.20%, compared to RTLR's ROE of -3260.98%. Regarding short-term risk, AM is less volatile compared to RTLR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AM.Check RTLR's competition here
AM vs NGL-PC Comparison July 2026
AM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AM stands at 10.7B. In comparison, NGL-PC has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, AM is priced at $22.59, while NGL-PC trades at $25.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AM currently has a P/E ratio of 26.27, whereas NGL-PC's P/E ratio is -8.55. In terms of profitability, AM's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NGL-PC's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, AM is more volatile compared to NGL-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AM.Check NGL-PC's competition here
AM vs NGL-PB Comparison July 2026
AM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AM stands at 10.7B. In comparison, NGL-PB has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, AM is priced at $22.59, while NGL-PB trades at $25.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AM currently has a P/E ratio of 26.27, whereas NGL-PB's P/E ratio is -8.41. In terms of profitability, AM's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NGL-PB's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, AM is more volatile compared to NGL-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AM.Check NGL-PB's competition here
AM vs NSS Comparison July 2026
AM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AM stands at 10.7B. In comparison, NSS has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, AM is priced at $22.59, while NSS trades at $25.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AM currently has a P/E ratio of 26.27, whereas NSS's P/E ratio is -508.80. In terms of profitability, AM's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NSS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, AM is more volatile compared to NSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AM.Check NSS's competition here
AM vs NGL Comparison July 2026
AM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AM stands at 10.7B. In comparison, NGL has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AM is priced at $22.59, while NGL trades at $15.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AM currently has a P/E ratio of 26.27, whereas NGL's P/E ratio is -17.80. In terms of profitability, AM's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NGL's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, AM is less volatile compared to NGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AM.Check NGL's competition here
AM vs GEL Comparison July 2026
AM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AM stands at 10.7B. In comparison, GEL has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AM is priced at $22.59, while GEL trades at $14.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AM currently has a P/E ratio of 26.27, whereas GEL's P/E ratio is -76.84. In terms of profitability, AM's ROE is +0.20%, compared to GEL's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AM is less volatile compared to GEL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AM.Check GEL's competition here
AM vs LPG Comparison July 2026
AM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AM stands at 10.7B. In comparison, LPG has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AM is priced at $22.59, while LPG trades at $41.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AM currently has a P/E ratio of 26.27, whereas LPG's P/E ratio is 8.95. In terms of profitability, AM's ROE is +0.20%, compared to LPG's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, AM is less volatile compared to LPG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AM.Check LPG's competition here
AM vs GLOG-PA Comparison July 2026
AM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AM stands at 10.7B. In comparison, GLOG-PA has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AM is priced at $22.59, while GLOG-PA trades at $25.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AM currently has a P/E ratio of 26.27, whereas GLOG-PA's P/E ratio is 44.93. In terms of profitability, AM's ROE is +0.20%, compared to GLOG-PA's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AM is more volatile compared to GLOG-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AM.Check GLOG-PA's competition here
AM vs PBT Comparison July 2026
AM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AM stands at 10.7B. In comparison, PBT has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AM is priced at $22.59, while PBT trades at $28.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AM currently has a P/E ratio of 26.27, whereas PBT's P/E ratio is 88.75. In terms of profitability, AM's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PBT's ROE of +90.62%. Regarding short-term risk, AM is less volatile compared to PBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AM.Check PBT's competition here
AM vs TEN Comparison July 2026
AM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AM stands at 10.7B. In comparison, TEN has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AM is priced at $22.59, while TEN trades at $37.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AM currently has a P/E ratio of 26.27, whereas TEN's P/E ratio is 6.13. In terms of profitability, AM's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TEN's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AM is less volatile compared to TEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AM.Check TEN's competition here
AM vs GLP-PA Comparison July 2026
AM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AM stands at 10.7B. In comparison, GLP-PA has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, AM is priced at $22.59, while GLP-PA trades at $43.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AM currently has a P/E ratio of 26.27, whereas GLP-PA's P/E ratio is 21.49. In terms of profitability, AM's ROE is +0.20%, compared to GLP-PA's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, AM is less volatile compared to GLP-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AM.Check GLP-PA's competition here
AM vs CEQP-P Comparison July 2026
AM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AM stands at 10.7B. In comparison, CEQP-P has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, AM is priced at $22.59, while CEQP-P trades at $9.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AM currently has a P/E ratio of 26.27, whereas CEQP-P's P/E ratio is -12.22. In terms of profitability, AM's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CEQP-P's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AM is less volatile compared to CEQP-P. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AM.Check CEQP-P's competition here
AM vs TNP-PE Comparison July 2026
AM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AM stands at 10.7B. In comparison, TNP-PE has a market cap of 991.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AM is priced at $22.59, while TNP-PE trades at $78.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AM currently has a P/E ratio of 26.27, whereas TNP-PE's P/E ratio is -8.23. In terms of profitability, AM's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TNP-PE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AM is less volatile compared to TNP-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AM.Check TNP-PE's competition here
AM vs TK Comparison July 2026
AM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AM stands at 10.7B. In comparison, TK has a market cap of 925.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AM is priced at $22.59, while TK trades at $10.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AM currently has a P/E ratio of 26.27, whereas TK's P/E ratio is 7.05. In terms of profitability, AM's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TK's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, AM is less volatile compared to TK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AM.Check TK's competition here
AM vs WHK Comparison July 2026
AM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AM stands at 10.7B. In comparison, WHK has a market cap of 592M. Regarding current trading prices, AM is priced at $22.59, while WHK trades at $25.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AM currently has a P/E ratio of 26.27, whereas WHK's P/E ratio is -171.63. In terms of profitability, AM's ROE is +0.20%, compared to WHK's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AM is less volatile compared to WHK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AM.Check WHK's competition here
AM vs TEN-PE Comparison July 2026
AM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AM stands at 10.7B. In comparison, TEN-PE has a market cap of 540.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AM is priced at $22.59, while TEN-PE trades at $26.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AM currently has a P/E ratio of 26.27, whereas TEN-PE's P/E ratio is 6.01. In terms of profitability, AM's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TEN-PE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AM is more volatile compared to TEN-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AM.Check TEN-PE's competition here
AM vs TNP Comparison July 2026
AM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AM stands at 10.7B. In comparison, TNP has a market cap of 539.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AM is priced at $22.59, while TNP trades at $18.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AM currently has a P/E ratio of 26.27, whereas TNP's P/E ratio is 3.69. In terms of profitability, AM's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TNP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AM is less volatile compared to TNP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AM.Check TNP's competition here
AM vs GLOP-PC Comparison July 2026
AM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AM stands at 10.7B. In comparison, GLOP-PC has a market cap of 411.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AM is priced at $22.59, while GLOP-PC trades at $25.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AM currently has a P/E ratio of 26.27, whereas GLOP-PC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AM's ROE is +0.20%, compared to GLOP-PC's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AM is more volatile compared to GLOP-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AM.Check GLOP-PC's competition here
AM vs GLOP-PA Comparison July 2026
AM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AM stands at 10.7B. In comparison, GLOP-PA has a market cap of 411.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AM is priced at $22.59, while GLOP-PA trades at $25.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AM currently has a P/E ratio of 26.27, whereas GLOP-PA's P/E ratio is 122.07. In terms of profitability, AM's ROE is +0.20%, compared to GLOP-PA's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AM is more volatile compared to GLOP-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AM.Check GLOP-PA's competition here
AM vs SMC Comparison July 2026
AM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AM stands at 10.7B. In comparison, SMC has a market cap of 405.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AM is priced at $22.59, while SMC trades at $29.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AM currently has a P/E ratio of 26.27, whereas SMC's P/E ratio is -15.61. In terms of profitability, AM's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SMC's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AM is less volatile compared to SMC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AM.Check SMC's competition here
AM vs SMLP Comparison July 2026
AM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AM stands at 10.7B. In comparison, SMLP has a market cap of 405.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AM is priced at $22.59, while SMLP trades at $38.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AM currently has a P/E ratio of 26.27, whereas SMLP's P/E ratio is 5.30. In terms of profitability, AM's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SMLP's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AM is less volatile compared to SMLP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AM.Check SMLP's competition here
AM vs DSSI Comparison July 2026
AM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AM stands at 10.7B. In comparison, DSSI has a market cap of 384.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AM is priced at $22.59, while DSSI trades at $9.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AM currently has a P/E ratio of 26.27, whereas DSSI's P/E ratio is -6.99. In terms of profitability, AM's ROE is +0.20%, compared to DSSI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AM is less volatile compared to DSSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AM.Check DSSI's competition here
AM vs SNMP Comparison July 2026
AM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AM stands at 10.7B. In comparison, SNMP has a market cap of 338.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AM is priced at $22.59, while SNMP trades at $1.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AM currently has a P/E ratio of 26.27, whereas SNMP's P/E ratio is -3.91. In terms of profitability, AM's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SNMP's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, AM is less volatile compared to SNMP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AM.Check SNMP's competition here
AM vs TNP-PF Comparison July 2026
AM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AM stands at 10.7B. In comparison, TNP-PF has a market cap of 334.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AM is priced at $22.59, while TNP-PF trades at $27.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AM currently has a P/E ratio of 26.27, whereas TNP-PF's P/E ratio is -2.84. In terms of profitability, AM's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TNP-PF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AM is more volatile compared to TNP-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AM.Check TNP-PF's competition here
AM vs TNP-PD Comparison July 2026
AM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AM stands at 10.7B. In comparison, TNP-PD has a market cap of 321.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AM is priced at $22.59, while TNP-PD trades at $25.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AM currently has a P/E ratio of 26.27, whereas TNP-PD's P/E ratio is -2.65. In terms of profitability, AM's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TNP-PD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AM is more volatile compared to TNP-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AM.Check TNP-PD's competition here
AM vs GPP Comparison July 2026
AM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AM stands at 10.7B. In comparison, GPP has a market cap of 286.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AM is priced at $22.59, while GPP trades at $12.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AM currently has a P/E ratio of 26.27, whereas GPP's P/E ratio is 7.60. In terms of profitability, AM's ROE is +0.20%, compared to GPP's ROE of +26.63%. Regarding short-term risk, AM is less volatile compared to GPP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AM.Check GPP's competition here
AM vs GLOP Comparison July 2026
AM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AM stands at 10.7B. In comparison, GLOP has a market cap of 277.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AM is priced at $22.59, while GLOP trades at $5.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AM currently has a P/E ratio of 26.27, whereas GLOP's P/E ratio is 3.07. In terms of profitability, AM's ROE is +0.20%, compared to GLOP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AM is less volatile compared to GLOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AM.Check GLOP's competition here
AM vs BROG Comparison July 2026
AM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AM stands at 10.7B. In comparison, BROG has a market cap of 232.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AM is priced at $22.59, while BROG trades at $2.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AM currently has a P/E ratio of 26.27, whereas BROG's P/E ratio is 52.00. In terms of profitability, AM's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BROG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AM is less volatile compared to BROG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AM.Check BROG's competition here
AM vs MMLP Comparison July 2026
AM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AM stands at 10.7B. In comparison, MMLP has a market cap of 95.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AM is priced at $22.59, while MMLP trades at $2.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AM currently has a P/E ratio of 26.27, whereas MMLP's P/E ratio is -4.76. In terms of profitability, AM's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MMLP's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, AM is less volatile compared to MMLP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AM.Check MMLP's competition here
AM vs DLNG-PB Comparison July 2026
AM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AM stands at 10.7B. In comparison, DLNG-PB has a market cap of 83.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AM is priced at $22.59, while DLNG-PB trades at $25.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AM currently has a P/E ratio of 26.27, whereas DLNG-PB's P/E ratio is 22.51. In terms of profitability, AM's ROE is +0.20%, compared to DLNG-PB's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AM is more volatile compared to DLNG-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AM.Check DLNG-PB's competition here
AM vs RBNEV Comparison July 2026
AM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AM stands at 10.7B. In comparison, RBNEV has a market cap of 13.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AM is priced at $22.59, while RBNEV trades at $5.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AM currently has a P/E ratio of 26.27, whereas RBNEV's P/E ratio is -18.13. In terms of profitability, AM's ROE is +0.20%, compared to RBNEV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AM is less volatile compared to RBNEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AM.Check RBNEV's competition here
AM vs MARPS Comparison July 2026
AM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AM stands at 10.7B. In comparison, MARPS has a market cap of 9.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AM is priced at $22.59, while MARPS trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AM currently has a P/E ratio of 26.27, whereas MARPS's P/E ratio is 15.47. In terms of profitability, AM's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MARPS's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, AM is less volatile compared to MARPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AM.Check MARPS's competition here
AM vs BANL Comparison July 2026
AM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AM stands at 10.7B. In comparison, BANL has a market cap of 9.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AM is priced at $22.59, while BANL trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AM currently has a P/E ratio of 26.27, whereas BANL's P/E ratio is -20.66. In terms of profitability, AM's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BANL's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AM is less volatile compared to BANL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AM.Check BANL's competition here
AM vs PTLE Comparison July 2026
AM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AM stands at 10.7B. In comparison, PTLE has a market cap of 4.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AM is priced at $22.59, while PTLE trades at $10.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AM currently has a P/E ratio of 26.27, whereas PTLE's P/E ratio is -3.63. In terms of profitability, AM's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PTLE's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AM is less volatile compared to PTLE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AM.Check PTLE's competition here
AM vs RBNE Comparison July 2026
AM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AM stands at 10.7B. In comparison, RBNE has a market cap of 768K. Regarding current trading prices, AM is priced at $22.59, while RBNE trades at $4.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AM currently has a P/E ratio of 26.27, whereas RBNE's P/E ratio is 0.63. In terms of profitability, AM's ROE is +0.20%, compared to RBNE's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AM is less volatile compared to RBNE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AM.Check RBNE's competition here
AM vs BROGW Comparison July 2026
AM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AM stands at 10.7B. In comparison, BROGW has a market cap of 61.5K. Regarding current trading prices, AM is priced at $22.59, while BROGW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AM currently has a P/E ratio of 26.27, whereas BROGW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AM's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BROGW's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AM is less volatile compared to BROGW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AM.Check BROGW's competition here
AM vs HMLP-PA Comparison July 2026
AM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AM stands at 10.7B. In comparison, HMLP-PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AM is priced at $22.59, while HMLP-PA trades at $17.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AM currently has a P/E ratio of 26.27, whereas HMLP-PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AM's ROE is +0.20%, compared to HMLP-PA's ROE of -2.65%. Regarding short-term risk, AM is less volatile compared to HMLP-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AM.Check HMLP-PA's competition here
AM vs BKEP Comparison July 2026
AM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AM stands at 10.7B. In comparison, BKEP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AM is priced at $22.59, while BKEP trades at $4.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AM currently has a P/E ratio of 26.27, whereas BKEP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AM's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BKEP's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AM is more volatile compared to BKEP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AM.Check BKEP's competition here
AM vs SEP Comparison July 2026
AM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AM stands at 10.7B. In comparison, SEP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AM is priced at $22.59, while SEP trades at $35.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AM currently has a P/E ratio of 26.27, whereas SEP's P/E ratio is 44.68. In terms of profitability, AM's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SEP's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AM is more volatile compared to SEP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AM.Check SEP's competition here
AM vs TEP Comparison July 2026
AM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AM stands at 10.7B. In comparison, TEP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AM is priced at $22.59, while TEP trades at $43.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AM currently has a P/E ratio of 26.27, whereas TEP's P/E ratio is 6.77. In terms of profitability, AM's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TEP's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, AM is more volatile compared to TEP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AM.Check TEP's competition here
AM vs CQH Comparison July 2026
AM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AM stands at 10.7B. In comparison, CQH has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AM is priced at $22.59, while CQH trades at $32.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AM currently has a P/E ratio of 26.27, whereas CQH's P/E ratio is 20.80. In terms of profitability, AM's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CQH's ROE of -4.75%. Regarding short-term risk, AM is more volatile compared to CQH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AM.Check CQH's competition here
AM vs HMLP Comparison July 2026
AM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AM stands at 10.7B. In comparison, HMLP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AM is priced at $22.59, while HMLP trades at $9.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AM currently has a P/E ratio of 26.27, whereas HMLP's P/E ratio is 6.04. In terms of profitability, AM's ROE is +0.20%, compared to HMLP's ROE of -2.65%. Regarding short-term risk, AM is more volatile compared to HMLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AM.Check HMLP's competition here
AM vs ETP Comparison July 2026
AM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AM stands at 10.7B. In comparison, ETP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AM is priced at $22.59, while ETP trades at $16.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AM currently has a P/E ratio of 26.27, whereas ETP's P/E ratio is -134.62. In terms of profitability, AM's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ETP's ROE of +15.78%. Regarding short-term risk, AM is more volatile compared to ETP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AM.Check ETP's competition here
AM vs SHLX Comparison July 2026
AM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AM stands at 10.7B. In comparison, SHLX has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AM is priced at $22.59, while SHLX trades at $15.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AM currently has a P/E ratio of 26.27, whereas SHLX's P/E ratio is 13.07. In terms of profitability, AM's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SHLX's ROE of -56.82%. Regarding short-term risk, AM is more volatile compared to SHLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AM.Check SHLX's competition here
AM vs CPGX Comparison July 2026
AM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AM stands at 10.7B. In comparison, CPGX has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AM is priced at $22.59, while CPGX trades at $25.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AM currently has a P/E ratio of 26.27, whereas CPGX's P/E ratio is 71.36. In terms of profitability, AM's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CPGX's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AM is more volatile compared to CPGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AM.Check CPGX's competition here
AM vs ENBL Comparison July 2026
AM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AM stands at 10.7B. In comparison, ENBL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AM is priced at $22.59, while ENBL trades at $7.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AM currently has a P/E ratio of 26.27, whereas ENBL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AM's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ENBL's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AM is less volatile compared to ENBL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AM.Check ENBL's competition here
AM vs PSXP Comparison July 2026
AM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AM stands at 10.7B. In comparison, PSXP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AM is priced at $22.59, while PSXP trades at $42.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AM currently has a P/E ratio of 26.27, whereas PSXP's P/E ratio is 14.05. In terms of profitability, AM's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PSXP's ROE of -518.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AM is less volatile compared to PSXP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AM.Check PSXP's competition here
AM vs PBFX Comparison July 2026
AM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AM stands at 10.7B. In comparison, PBFX has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AM is priced at $22.59, while PBFX trades at $19.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AM currently has a P/E ratio of 26.27, whereas PBFX's P/E ratio is 8.22. In terms of profitability, AM's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PBFX's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, AM is less volatile compared to PBFX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AM.Check PBFX's competition here
AM vs BPMP Comparison July 2026
AM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AM stands at 10.7B. In comparison, BPMP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AM is priced at $22.59, while BPMP trades at $17.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AM currently has a P/E ratio of 26.27, whereas BPMP's P/E ratio is 12.26. In terms of profitability, AM's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BPMP's ROE of +1.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AM is more volatile compared to BPMP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AM.Check BPMP's competition here
AM vs VLP Comparison July 2026
AM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AM stands at 10.7B. In comparison, VLP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AM is priced at $22.59, while VLP trades at $42.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AM currently has a P/E ratio of 26.27, whereas VLP's P/E ratio is 45.91. In terms of profitability, AM's ROE is +0.20%, compared to VLP's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AM is more volatile compared to VLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AM.Check VLP's competition here
AM vs EQGP Comparison July 2026
AM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AM stands at 10.7B. In comparison, EQGP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AM is priced at $22.59, while EQGP trades at $19.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AM currently has a P/E ratio of 26.27, whereas EQGP's P/E ratio is 10.39. In terms of profitability, AM's ROE is +0.20%, compared to EQGP's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AM is more volatile compared to EQGP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AM.Check EQGP's competition here