NuStar Energy L.P.
NuStar Energy L.P. (NS-PA) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (NS-PA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Oil & Gas Midstream Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NS-PA | $24.99 | +0.06% | 2.8B | -8.66 | -$2.89 | +8.25% |
| ET-PE | $81.43 | +4.82% | 170.2B | 75.82 | $1.07 | +6.59% |
| ENB | $56.37 | +1.92% | 123.1B | 26.22 | $2.15 | +4.92% |
| EP-PC | $50.50 | -0.92% | 112.2B | N/A | N/A | +4.70% |
| WMB | $77.69 | -0.04% | 95B | 34.07 | $2.28 | +2.62% |
| EPD | $39.46 | +0.59% | 85.4B | 14.61 | $2.70 | +5.54% |
| KMI | $33.78 | +0.45% | 75.2B | 22.68 | $1.49 | +3.49% |
| TRP | $69.32 | +1.58% | 72.2B | 28.06 | $2.47 | +3.59% |
| ET | $20.19 | +0.20% | 69.6B | 16.87 | $1.20 | +6.59% |
| OKE | $93.76 | +1.56% | 59.1B | 16.71 | $5.61 | +4.51% |
Stock Comparison
NS-PA vs ET-PE Comparison May 2026
NS-PA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NS-PA stands at 2.8B. In comparison, ET-PE has a market cap of 170.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NS-PA is priced at $24.99, while ET-PE trades at $81.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -8.66, whereas ET-PE's P/E ratio is 75.82. In terms of profitability, NS-PA's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ET-PE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NS-PA is less volatile compared to ET-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NS-PA.Check ET-PE's competition here
NS-PA vs ENB Comparison May 2026
NS-PA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NS-PA stands at 2.8B. In comparison, ENB has a market cap of 123.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NS-PA is priced at $24.99, while ENB trades at $56.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -8.66, whereas ENB's P/E ratio is 26.22. In terms of profitability, NS-PA's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ENB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NS-PA is less volatile compared to ENB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NS-PA.Check ENB's competition here
NS-PA vs EP-PC Comparison May 2026
NS-PA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NS-PA stands at 2.8B. In comparison, EP-PC has a market cap of 112.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NS-PA is priced at $24.99, while EP-PC trades at $50.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -8.66, whereas EP-PC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NS-PA's ROE is +0.28%, compared to EP-PC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NS-PA is more volatile compared to EP-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NS-PA.Check EP-PC's competition here
NS-PA vs WMB Comparison May 2026
NS-PA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NS-PA stands at 2.8B. In comparison, WMB has a market cap of 95B. Regarding current trading prices, NS-PA is priced at $24.99, while WMB trades at $77.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -8.66, whereas WMB's P/E ratio is 34.07. In terms of profitability, NS-PA's ROE is +0.28%, compared to WMB's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, NS-PA is less volatile compared to WMB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NS-PA.Check WMB's competition here
NS-PA vs EPD Comparison May 2026
NS-PA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NS-PA stands at 2.8B. In comparison, EPD has a market cap of 85.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NS-PA is priced at $24.99, while EPD trades at $39.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -8.66, whereas EPD's P/E ratio is 14.61. In terms of profitability, NS-PA's ROE is +0.28%, compared to EPD's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, NS-PA is less volatile compared to EPD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NS-PA.Check EPD's competition here
NS-PA vs KMI Comparison May 2026
NS-PA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NS-PA stands at 2.8B. In comparison, KMI has a market cap of 75.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NS-PA is priced at $24.99, while KMI trades at $33.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -8.66, whereas KMI's P/E ratio is 22.68. In terms of profitability, NS-PA's ROE is +0.28%, compared to KMI's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NS-PA is less volatile compared to KMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NS-PA.Check KMI's competition here
NS-PA vs TRP Comparison May 2026
NS-PA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NS-PA stands at 2.8B. In comparison, TRP has a market cap of 72.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NS-PA is priced at $24.99, while TRP trades at $69.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -8.66, whereas TRP's P/E ratio is 28.06. In terms of profitability, NS-PA's ROE is +0.28%, compared to TRP's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NS-PA is less volatile compared to TRP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NS-PA.Check TRP's competition here
NS-PA vs ET Comparison May 2026
NS-PA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NS-PA stands at 2.8B. In comparison, ET has a market cap of 69.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NS-PA is priced at $24.99, while ET trades at $20.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -8.66, whereas ET's P/E ratio is 16.87. In terms of profitability, NS-PA's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ET's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NS-PA is less volatile compared to ET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NS-PA.Check ET's competition here
NS-PA vs OKE Comparison May 2026
NS-PA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NS-PA stands at 2.8B. In comparison, OKE has a market cap of 59.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NS-PA is priced at $24.99, while OKE trades at $93.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -8.66, whereas OKE's P/E ratio is 16.71. In terms of profitability, NS-PA's ROE is +0.28%, compared to OKE's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NS-PA is less volatile compared to OKE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NS-PA.Check OKE's competition here
NS-PA vs TRGP Comparison May 2026
NS-PA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NS-PA stands at 2.8B. In comparison, TRGP has a market cap of 59B. Regarding current trading prices, NS-PA is priced at $24.99, while TRGP trades at $274.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -8.66, whereas TRGP's P/E ratio is 28.06. In terms of profitability, NS-PA's ROE is +0.28%, compared to TRGP's ROE of +0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, NS-PA is less volatile compared to TRGP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NS-PA.Check TRGP's competition here
NS-PA vs MPLX Comparison May 2026
NS-PA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NS-PA stands at 2.8B. In comparison, MPLX has a market cap of 56.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NS-PA is priced at $24.99, while MPLX trades at $55.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -8.66, whereas MPLX's P/E ratio is 12.00. In terms of profitability, NS-PA's ROE is +0.28%, compared to MPLX's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, NS-PA is less volatile compared to MPLX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NS-PA.Check MPLX's competition here
NS-PA vs LNG Comparison May 2026
NS-PA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NS-PA stands at 2.8B. In comparison, LNG has a market cap of 51.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NS-PA is priced at $24.99, while LNG trades at $247.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -8.66, whereas LNG's P/E ratio is 41.99. In terms of profitability, NS-PA's ROE is +0.28%, compared to LNG's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, NS-PA is less volatile compared to LNG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NS-PA.Check LNG's competition here
NS-PA vs ET-PD Comparison May 2026
NS-PA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NS-PA stands at 2.8B. In comparison, ET-PD has a market cap of 50.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NS-PA is priced at $24.99, while ET-PD trades at $25.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -8.66, whereas ET-PD's P/E ratio is 23.81. In terms of profitability, NS-PA's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ET-PD's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NS-PA is less volatile compared to ET-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NS-PA.Check ET-PD's competition here
NS-PA vs ET-PC Comparison May 2026
NS-PA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NS-PA stands at 2.8B. In comparison, ET-PC has a market cap of 50.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NS-PA is priced at $24.99, while ET-PC trades at $25.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -8.66, whereas ET-PC's P/E ratio is 23.81. In terms of profitability, NS-PA's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ET-PC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NS-PA is less volatile compared to ET-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NS-PA.Check ET-PC's competition here
NS-PA vs ENBA Comparison May 2026
NS-PA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NS-PA stands at 2.8B. In comparison, ENBA has a market cap of 41.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NS-PA is priced at $24.99, while ENBA trades at $25.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -8.66, whereas ENBA's P/E ratio is 24.08. In terms of profitability, NS-PA's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ENBA's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NS-PA and ENBA have similar daily volatility (0.04).Check ENBA's competition here
NS-PA vs ET-PI Comparison May 2026
NS-PA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NS-PA stands at 2.8B. In comparison, ET-PI has a market cap of 40B. Regarding current trading prices, NS-PA is priced at $24.99, while ET-PI trades at $11.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -8.66, whereas ET-PI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NS-PA's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ET-PI's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NS-PA is less volatile compared to ET-PI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NS-PA.Check ET-PI's competition here
NS-PA vs VG Comparison May 2026
NS-PA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NS-PA stands at 2.8B. In comparison, VG has a market cap of 34.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NS-PA is priced at $24.99, while VG trades at $14.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -8.66, whereas VG's P/E ratio is 14.74. In terms of profitability, NS-PA's ROE is +0.28%, compared to VG's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, NS-PA is less volatile compared to VG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NS-PA.Check VG's competition here
NS-PA vs MPLXP Comparison May 2026
NS-PA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NS-PA stands at 2.8B. In comparison, MPLXP has a market cap of 33.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NS-PA is priced at $24.99, while MPLXP trades at $33.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -8.66, whereas MPLXP's P/E ratio is 11.29. In terms of profitability, NS-PA's ROE is +0.28%, compared to MPLXP's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, NS-PA is more volatile compared to MPLXP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NS-PA.Check MPLXP's competition here
NS-PA vs CQP Comparison May 2026
NS-PA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NS-PA stands at 2.8B. In comparison, CQP has a market cap of 31.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NS-PA is priced at $24.99, while CQP trades at $64.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -8.66, whereas CQP's P/E ratio is 15.03. In terms of profitability, NS-PA's ROE is +0.28%, compared to CQP's ROE of +0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, NS-PA is less volatile compared to CQP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NS-PA.Check CQP's competition here
NS-PA vs PBA Comparison May 2026
NS-PA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NS-PA stands at 2.8B. In comparison, PBA has a market cap of 28.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NS-PA is priced at $24.99, while PBA trades at $49.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -8.66, whereas PBA's P/E ratio is 25.50. In terms of profitability, NS-PA's ROE is +0.28%, compared to PBA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NS-PA is less volatile compared to PBA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NS-PA.Check PBA's competition here
NS-PA vs WES Comparison May 2026
NS-PA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NS-PA stands at 2.8B. In comparison, WES has a market cap of 18.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NS-PA is priced at $24.99, while WES trades at $47.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -8.66, whereas WES's P/E ratio is 15.51. In terms of profitability, NS-PA's ROE is +0.28%, compared to WES's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, NS-PA is less volatile compared to WES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NS-PA.Check WES's competition here
NS-PA vs VNOM Comparison May 2026
NS-PA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NS-PA stands at 2.8B. In comparison, VNOM has a market cap of 17.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NS-PA is priced at $24.99, while VNOM trades at $49.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -8.66, whereas VNOM's P/E ratio is -86.18. In terms of profitability, NS-PA's ROE is +0.28%, compared to VNOM's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NS-PA is less volatile compared to VNOM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NS-PA.Check VNOM's competition here
NS-PA vs PAA Comparison May 2026
NS-PA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NS-PA stands at 2.8B. In comparison, PAA has a market cap of 16.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NS-PA is priced at $24.99, while PAA trades at $23.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -8.66, whereas PAA's P/E ratio is 20.87. In terms of profitability, NS-PA's ROE is +0.28%, compared to PAA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NS-PA is less volatile compared to PAA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NS-PA.Check PAA's competition here
NS-PA vs DTM Comparison May 2026
NS-PA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NS-PA stands at 2.8B. In comparison, DTM has a market cap of 15.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NS-PA is priced at $24.99, while DTM trades at $148.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -8.66, whereas DTM's P/E ratio is 32.93. In terms of profitability, NS-PA's ROE is +0.28%, compared to DTM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NS-PA is less volatile compared to DTM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NS-PA.Check DTM's competition here
NS-PA vs MMP Comparison May 2026
NS-PA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NS-PA stands at 2.8B. In comparison, MMP has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NS-PA is priced at $24.99, while MMP trades at $69.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -8.66, whereas MMP's P/E ratio is 13.80. In terms of profitability, NS-PA's ROE is +0.28%, compared to MMP's ROE of -8.33%. Regarding short-term risk, NS-PA is less volatile compared to MMP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NS-PA.Check MMP's competition here
NS-PA vs AM Comparison May 2026
NS-PA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NS-PA stands at 2.8B. In comparison, AM has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NS-PA is priced at $24.99, while AM trades at $22.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -8.66, whereas AM's P/E ratio is 25.92. In terms of profitability, NS-PA's ROE is +0.28%, compared to AM's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, NS-PA is less volatile compared to AM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NS-PA.Check AM's competition here
NS-PA vs DCP Comparison May 2026
NS-PA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NS-PA stands at 2.8B. In comparison, DCP has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NS-PA is priced at $24.99, while DCP trades at $41.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -8.66, whereas DCP's P/E ratio is 7.75. In terms of profitability, NS-PA's ROE is +0.28%, compared to DCP's ROE of -351.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NS-PA is less volatile compared to DCP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NS-PA.Check DCP's competition here
NS-PA vs FRO Comparison May 2026
NS-PA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NS-PA stands at 2.8B. In comparison, FRO has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NS-PA is priced at $24.99, while FRO trades at $37.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -8.66, whereas FRO's P/E ratio is 22.20. In terms of profitability, NS-PA's ROE is +0.28%, compared to FRO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NS-PA is less volatile compared to FRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NS-PA.Check FRO's competition here
NS-PA vs HESM Comparison May 2026
NS-PA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NS-PA stands at 2.8B. In comparison, HESM has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NS-PA is priced at $24.99, while HESM trades at $40.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -8.66, whereas HESM's P/E ratio is 14.04. In terms of profitability, NS-PA's ROE is +0.28%, compared to HESM's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, NS-PA is less volatile compared to HESM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NS-PA.Check HESM's competition here
NS-PA vs SOBO Comparison May 2026
NS-PA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NS-PA stands at 2.8B. In comparison, SOBO has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NS-PA is priced at $24.99, while SOBO trades at $37.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -8.66, whereas SOBO's P/E ratio is 18.58. In terms of profitability, NS-PA's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SOBO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NS-PA is less volatile compared to SOBO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NS-PA.Check SOBO's competition here
NS-PA vs DCP-PC Comparison May 2026
NS-PA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NS-PA stands at 2.8B. In comparison, DCP-PC has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NS-PA is priced at $24.99, while DCP-PC trades at $25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -8.66, whereas DCP-PC's P/E ratio is 57.73. In terms of profitability, NS-PA's ROE is +0.28%, compared to DCP-PC's ROE of -351.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NS-PA is less volatile compared to DCP-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NS-PA.Check DCP-PC's competition here
NS-PA vs ENLC Comparison May 2026
NS-PA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NS-PA stands at 2.8B. In comparison, ENLC has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NS-PA is priced at $24.99, while ENLC trades at $14.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -8.66, whereas ENLC's P/E ratio is 64.18. In terms of profitability, NS-PA's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ENLC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NS-PA is less volatile compared to ENLC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NS-PA.Check ENLC's competition here
NS-PA vs GLNG Comparison May 2026
NS-PA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NS-PA stands at 2.8B. In comparison, GLNG has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NS-PA is priced at $24.99, while GLNG trades at $56.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -8.66, whereas GLNG's P/E ratio is 94.63. In terms of profitability, NS-PA's ROE is +0.28%, compared to GLNG's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NS-PA is less volatile compared to GLNG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NS-PA.Check GLNG's competition here
NS-PA vs ETRN Comparison May 2026
NS-PA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NS-PA stands at 2.8B. In comparison, ETRN has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NS-PA is priced at $24.99, while ETRN trades at $12.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -8.66, whereas ETRN's P/E ratio is 13.80. In terms of profitability, NS-PA's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ETRN's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, NS-PA is less volatile compared to ETRN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NS-PA.Check ETRN's competition here
NS-PA vs PAGP Comparison May 2026
NS-PA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NS-PA stands at 2.8B. In comparison, PAGP has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NS-PA is priced at $24.99, while PAGP trades at $24.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -8.66, whereas PAGP's P/E ratio is 31.88. In terms of profitability, NS-PA's ROE is +0.28%, compared to PAGP's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NS-PA is less volatile compared to PAGP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NS-PA.Check PAGP's competition here
NS-PA vs STNG Comparison May 2026
NS-PA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NS-PA stands at 2.8B. In comparison, STNG has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NS-PA is priced at $24.99, while STNG trades at $81.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -8.66, whereas STNG's P/E ratio is 8.09. In terms of profitability, NS-PA's ROE is +0.28%, compared to STNG's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NS-PA is less volatile compared to STNG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NS-PA.Check STNG's competition here
NS-PA vs INSW Comparison May 2026
NS-PA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NS-PA stands at 2.8B. In comparison, INSW has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NS-PA is priced at $24.99, while INSW trades at $85.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -8.66, whereas INSW's P/E ratio is 7.77. In terms of profitability, NS-PA's ROE is +0.28%, compared to INSW's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, NS-PA is less volatile compared to INSW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NS-PA.Check INSW's competition here
NS-PA vs KNTK Comparison May 2026
NS-PA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NS-PA stands at 2.8B. In comparison, KNTK has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NS-PA is priced at $24.99, while KNTK trades at $50.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -8.66, whereas KNTK's P/E ratio is 20.15. In terms of profitability, NS-PA's ROE is +0.28%, compared to KNTK's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NS-PA is less volatile compared to KNTK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NS-PA.Check KNTK's competition here
NS-PA vs TRMD Comparison May 2026
NS-PA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NS-PA stands at 2.8B. In comparison, TRMD has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NS-PA is priced at $24.99, while TRMD trades at $32.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -8.66, whereas TRMD's P/E ratio is 9.53. In terms of profitability, NS-PA's ROE is +0.28%, compared to TRMD's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NS-PA is less volatile compared to TRMD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NS-PA.Check TRMD's competition here
NS-PA vs EURN Comparison May 2026
NS-PA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NS-PA stands at 2.8B. In comparison, EURN has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NS-PA is priced at $24.99, while EURN trades at $16.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -8.66, whereas EURN's P/E ratio is 2.87. In terms of profitability, NS-PA's ROE is +0.28%, compared to EURN's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, NS-PA is less volatile compared to EURN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NS-PA.Check EURN's competition here
NS-PA vs NGL-PC Comparison May 2026
NS-PA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NS-PA stands at 2.8B. In comparison, NGL-PC has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NS-PA is priced at $24.99, while NGL-PC trades at $25.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -8.66, whereas NGL-PC's P/E ratio is -11.44. In terms of profitability, NS-PA's ROE is +0.28%, compared to NGL-PC's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, NS-PA is less volatile compared to NGL-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NS-PA.Check NGL-PC's competition here
NS-PA vs NGL-PB Comparison May 2026
NS-PA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NS-PA stands at 2.8B. In comparison, NGL-PB has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NS-PA is priced at $24.99, while NGL-PB trades at $25.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -8.66, whereas NGL-PB's P/E ratio is -11.40. In terms of profitability, NS-PA's ROE is +0.28%, compared to NGL-PB's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, NS-PA is less volatile compared to NGL-PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NS-PA.Check NGL-PB's competition here
NS-PA vs SUNC Comparison May 2026
NS-PA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NS-PA stands at 2.8B. In comparison, SUNC has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NS-PA is priced at $24.99, while SUNC trades at $71.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -8.66, whereas SUNC's P/E ratio is 7.42. In terms of profitability, NS-PA's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SUNC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NS-PA is less volatile compared to SUNC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NS-PA.Check SUNC's competition here
NS-PA vs CEQP Comparison May 2026
NS-PA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NS-PA stands at 2.8B. In comparison, CEQP has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, NS-PA is priced at $24.99, while CEQP trades at $28.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -8.66, whereas CEQP's P/E ratio is 21.91. In terms of profitability, NS-PA's ROE is +0.28%, compared to CEQP's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NS-PA is less volatile compared to CEQP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NS-PA.Check CEQP's competition here
NS-PA vs DHT Comparison May 2026
NS-PA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NS-PA stands at 2.8B. In comparison, DHT has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NS-PA is priced at $24.99, while DHT trades at $17.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -8.66, whereas DHT's P/E ratio is 8.69. In terms of profitability, NS-PA's ROE is +0.28%, compared to DHT's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, NS-PA is less volatile compared to DHT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NS-PA.Check DHT's competition here
NS-PA vs NS Comparison May 2026
NS-PA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NS-PA stands at 2.8B. In comparison, NS has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NS-PA is priced at $24.99, while NS trades at $21.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -8.66, whereas NS's P/E ratio is 84.46. In terms of profitability, NS-PA's ROE is +0.28%, compared to NS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, NS-PA is less volatile compared to NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NS-PA.Check NS's competition here
NS-PA vs NS-PB Comparison May 2026
NS-PA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NS-PA stands at 2.8B. In comparison, NS-PB has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NS-PA is priced at $24.99, while NS-PB trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -8.66, whereas NS-PB's P/E ratio is -19.83. In terms of profitability, NS-PA's ROE is +0.28%, compared to NS-PB's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, NS-PA is less volatile compared to NS-PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NS-PA.Check NS-PB's competition here
NS-PA vs DKL Comparison May 2026
NS-PA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NS-PA stands at 2.8B. In comparison, DKL has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NS-PA is priced at $24.99, while DKL trades at $52.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -8.66, whereas DKL's P/E ratio is 16.44. In terms of profitability, NS-PA's ROE is +0.28%, compared to DKL's ROE of +19.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NS-PA is less volatile compared to DKL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NS-PA.Check DKL's competition here
NS-PA vs HEP Comparison May 2026
NS-PA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NS-PA stands at 2.8B. In comparison, HEP has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NS-PA is priced at $24.99, while HEP trades at $20.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -8.66, whereas HEP's P/E ratio is 10.76. In terms of profitability, NS-PA's ROE is +0.28%, compared to HEP's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, NS-PA is less volatile compared to HEP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NS-PA.Check HEP's competition here
NS-PA vs SEAL-PB Comparison May 2026
NS-PA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NS-PA stands at 2.8B. In comparison, SEAL-PB has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NS-PA is priced at $24.99, while SEAL-PB trades at $25.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -8.66, whereas SEAL-PB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NS-PA's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SEAL-PB's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NS-PA is less volatile compared to SEAL-PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NS-PA.Check SEAL-PB's competition here
NS-PA vs SEAL-PA Comparison May 2026
NS-PA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NS-PA stands at 2.8B. In comparison, SEAL-PA has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NS-PA is priced at $24.99, while SEAL-PA trades at $25.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -8.66, whereas SEAL-PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NS-PA's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SEAL-PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NS-PA is less volatile compared to SEAL-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NS-PA.Check SEAL-PA's competition here
NS-PA vs NS-PC Comparison May 2026
NS-PA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NS-PA stands at 2.8B. In comparison, NS-PC has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NS-PA is priced at $24.99, while NS-PC trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -8.66, whereas NS-PC's P/E ratio is 20.10. In terms of profitability, NS-PA's ROE is +0.28%, compared to NS-PC's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, NS-PA is less volatile compared to NS-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NS-PA.Check NS-PC's competition here
NS-PA vs RTLR Comparison May 2026
NS-PA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NS-PA stands at 2.8B. In comparison, RTLR has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NS-PA is priced at $24.99, while RTLR trades at $15.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -8.66, whereas RTLR's P/E ratio is 16.37. In terms of profitability, NS-PA's ROE is +0.28%, compared to RTLR's ROE of -3260.98%. Regarding short-term risk, NS-PA is less volatile compared to RTLR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NS-PA.Check RTLR's competition here
NS-PA vs NGL Comparison May 2026
NS-PA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NS-PA stands at 2.8B. In comparison, NGL has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NS-PA is priced at $24.99, while NGL trades at $17.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -8.66, whereas NGL's P/E ratio is -68.27. In terms of profitability, NS-PA's ROE is +0.28%, compared to NGL's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, NS-PA is less volatile compared to NGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NS-PA.Check NGL's competition here
NS-PA vs GEL Comparison May 2026
NS-PA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NS-PA stands at 2.8B. In comparison, GEL has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, NS-PA is priced at $24.99, while GEL trades at $16.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -8.66, whereas GEL's P/E ratio is -85.47. In terms of profitability, NS-PA's ROE is +0.28%, compared to GEL's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NS-PA is less volatile compared to GEL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NS-PA.Check GEL's competition here
NS-PA vs NSS Comparison May 2026
NS-PA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NS-PA stands at 2.8B. In comparison, NSS has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, NS-PA is priced at $24.99, while NSS trades at $25.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -8.66, whereas NSS's P/E ratio is -508.80. In terms of profitability, NS-PA's ROE is +0.28%, compared to NSS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, NS-PA is less volatile compared to NSS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NS-PA.Check NSS's competition here
NS-PA vs LPG Comparison May 2026
NS-PA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NS-PA stands at 2.8B. In comparison, LPG has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NS-PA is priced at $24.99, while LPG trades at $41.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -8.66, whereas LPG's P/E ratio is 14.81. In terms of profitability, NS-PA's ROE is +0.28%, compared to LPG's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NS-PA is less volatile compared to LPG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NS-PA.Check LPG's competition here
NS-PA vs FLNG Comparison May 2026
NS-PA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NS-PA stands at 2.8B. In comparison, FLNG has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NS-PA is priced at $24.99, while FLNG trades at $32.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -8.66, whereas FLNG's P/E ratio is 23.31. In terms of profitability, NS-PA's ROE is +0.28%, compared to FLNG's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NS-PA is less volatile compared to FLNG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NS-PA.Check FLNG's competition here
NS-PA vs GLP Comparison May 2026
NS-PA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NS-PA stands at 2.8B. In comparison, GLP has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NS-PA is priced at $24.99, while GLP trades at $48.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -8.66, whereas GLP's P/E ratio is 13.56. In terms of profitability, NS-PA's ROE is +0.28%, compared to GLP's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NS-PA is less volatile compared to GLP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NS-PA.Check GLP's competition here
NS-PA vs NVGS Comparison May 2026
NS-PA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NS-PA stands at 2.8B. In comparison, NVGS has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NS-PA is priced at $24.99, while NVGS trades at $24.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -8.66, whereas NVGS's P/E ratio is 14.98. In terms of profitability, NS-PA's ROE is +0.28%, compared to NVGS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NS-PA is less volatile compared to NVGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NS-PA.Check NVGS's competition here
NS-PA vs GLOG-PA Comparison May 2026
NS-PA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NS-PA stands at 2.8B. In comparison, GLOG-PA has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NS-PA is priced at $24.99, while GLOG-PA trades at $25.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -8.66, whereas GLOG-PA's P/E ratio is 44.93. In terms of profitability, NS-PA's ROE is +0.28%, compared to GLOG-PA's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NS-PA is more volatile compared to GLOG-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NS-PA.Check GLOG-PA's competition here
NS-PA vs PBT Comparison May 2026
NS-PA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NS-PA stands at 2.8B. In comparison, PBT has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NS-PA is priced at $24.99, while PBT trades at $29.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -8.66, whereas PBT's P/E ratio is 95.68. In terms of profitability, NS-PA's ROE is +0.28%, compared to PBT's ROE of +120.82%. Regarding short-term risk, NS-PA is less volatile compared to PBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NS-PA.Check PBT's competition here
NS-PA vs TEN Comparison May 2026
NS-PA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NS-PA stands at 2.8B. In comparison, TEN has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NS-PA is priced at $24.99, while TEN trades at $42.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -8.66, whereas TEN's P/E ratio is 9.65. In terms of profitability, NS-PA's ROE is +0.28%, compared to TEN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NS-PA is less volatile compared to TEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NS-PA.Check TEN's competition here
NS-PA vs TK Comparison May 2026
NS-PA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NS-PA stands at 2.8B. In comparison, TK has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NS-PA is priced at $24.99, while TK trades at $13.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -8.66, whereas TK's P/E ratio is 11.93. In terms of profitability, NS-PA's ROE is +0.28%, compared to TK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NS-PA is less volatile compared to TK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NS-PA.Check TK's competition here
NS-PA vs GLP-PA Comparison May 2026
NS-PA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NS-PA stands at 2.8B. In comparison, GLP-PA has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, NS-PA is priced at $24.99, while GLP-PA trades at $43.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -8.66, whereas GLP-PA's P/E ratio is 21.49. In terms of profitability, NS-PA's ROE is +0.28%, compared to GLP-PA's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NS-PA is less volatile compared to GLP-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NS-PA.Check GLP-PA's competition here
NS-PA vs CEQP-P Comparison May 2026
NS-PA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NS-PA stands at 2.8B. In comparison, CEQP-P has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, NS-PA is priced at $24.99, while CEQP-P trades at $9.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -8.66, whereas CEQP-P's P/E ratio is -12.22. In terms of profitability, NS-PA's ROE is +0.28%, compared to CEQP-P's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NS-PA is less volatile compared to CEQP-P. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NS-PA.Check CEQP-P's competition here
NS-PA vs TNP-PE Comparison May 2026
NS-PA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NS-PA stands at 2.8B. In comparison, TNP-PE has a market cap of 991.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NS-PA is priced at $24.99, while TNP-PE trades at $78.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -8.66, whereas TNP-PE's P/E ratio is -8.23. In terms of profitability, NS-PA's ROE is +0.28%, compared to TNP-PE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NS-PA is less volatile compared to TNP-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NS-PA.Check TNP-PE's competition here
NS-PA vs GLP-PB Comparison May 2026
NS-PA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NS-PA stands at 2.8B. In comparison, GLP-PB has a market cap of 860.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NS-PA is priced at $24.99, while GLP-PB trades at $25.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -8.66, whereas GLP-PB's P/E ratio is 11.19. In terms of profitability, NS-PA's ROE is +0.28%, compared to GLP-PB's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NS-PA is less volatile compared to GLP-PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NS-PA.Check GLP-PB's competition here
NS-PA vs TEN-PE Comparison May 2026
NS-PA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NS-PA stands at 2.8B. In comparison, TEN-PE has a market cap of 797.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NS-PA is priced at $24.99, while TEN-PE trades at $26.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -8.66, whereas TEN-PE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NS-PA's ROE is +0.28%, compared to TEN-PE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NS-PA is less volatile compared to TEN-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NS-PA.Check TEN-PE's competition here
NS-PA vs TNP Comparison May 2026
NS-PA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NS-PA stands at 2.8B. In comparison, TNP has a market cap of 539.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NS-PA is priced at $24.99, while TNP trades at $18.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -8.66, whereas TNP's P/E ratio is 3.69. In terms of profitability, NS-PA's ROE is +0.28%, compared to TNP's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NS-PA is less volatile compared to TNP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NS-PA.Check TNP's competition here
NS-PA vs SMC Comparison May 2026
NS-PA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NS-PA stands at 2.8B. In comparison, SMC has a market cap of 440.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NS-PA is priced at $24.99, while SMC trades at $31.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -8.66, whereas SMC's P/E ratio is -16.95. In terms of profitability, NS-PA's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SMC's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NS-PA is less volatile compared to SMC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NS-PA.Check SMC's competition here
NS-PA vs GLOP-PB Comparison May 2026
NS-PA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NS-PA stands at 2.8B. In comparison, GLOP-PB has a market cap of 412.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NS-PA is priced at $24.99, while GLOP-PB trades at $25.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -8.66, whereas GLOP-PB's P/E ratio is -58.14. In terms of profitability, NS-PA's ROE is +0.28%, compared to GLOP-PB's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NS-PA is less volatile compared to GLOP-PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NS-PA.Check GLOP-PB's competition here
NS-PA vs GLOP-PA Comparison May 2026
NS-PA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NS-PA stands at 2.8B. In comparison, GLOP-PA has a market cap of 411.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NS-PA is priced at $24.99, while GLOP-PA trades at $25.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -8.66, whereas GLOP-PA's P/E ratio is -58.05. In terms of profitability, NS-PA's ROE is +0.28%, compared to GLOP-PA's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NS-PA is less volatile compared to GLOP-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NS-PA.Check GLOP-PA's competition here
NS-PA vs GLOP-PC Comparison May 2026
NS-PA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NS-PA stands at 2.8B. In comparison, GLOP-PC has a market cap of 410.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NS-PA is priced at $24.99, while GLOP-PC trades at $25.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -8.66, whereas GLOP-PC's P/E ratio is -57.92. In terms of profitability, NS-PA's ROE is +0.28%, compared to GLOP-PC's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NS-PA is less volatile compared to GLOP-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NS-PA.Check GLOP-PC's competition here
NS-PA vs SMLP Comparison May 2026
NS-PA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NS-PA stands at 2.8B. In comparison, SMLP has a market cap of 405.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NS-PA is priced at $24.99, while SMLP trades at $38.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -8.66, whereas SMLP's P/E ratio is 5.30. In terms of profitability, NS-PA's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SMLP's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NS-PA is less volatile compared to SMLP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NS-PA.Check SMLP's competition here
NS-PA vs DSSI Comparison May 2026
NS-PA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NS-PA stands at 2.8B. In comparison, DSSI has a market cap of 384.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NS-PA is priced at $24.99, while DSSI trades at $9.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -8.66, whereas DSSI's P/E ratio is -6.99. In terms of profitability, NS-PA's ROE is +0.28%, compared to DSSI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NS-PA is less volatile compared to DSSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NS-PA.Check DSSI's competition here
NS-PA vs SNMP Comparison May 2026
NS-PA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NS-PA stands at 2.8B. In comparison, SNMP has a market cap of 338.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NS-PA is priced at $24.99, while SNMP trades at $1.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -8.66, whereas SNMP's P/E ratio is -3.91. In terms of profitability, NS-PA's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SNMP's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, NS-PA is less volatile compared to SNMP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NS-PA.Check SNMP's competition here
NS-PA vs TNP-PF Comparison May 2026
NS-PA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NS-PA stands at 2.8B. In comparison, TNP-PF has a market cap of 334.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NS-PA is priced at $24.99, while TNP-PF trades at $27.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -8.66, whereas TNP-PF's P/E ratio is -2.84. In terms of profitability, NS-PA's ROE is +0.28%, compared to TNP-PF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NS-PA is less volatile compared to TNP-PF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NS-PA.Check TNP-PF's competition here
NS-PA vs TNP-PD Comparison May 2026
NS-PA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NS-PA stands at 2.8B. In comparison, TNP-PD has a market cap of 321.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NS-PA is priced at $24.99, while TNP-PD trades at $25.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -8.66, whereas TNP-PD's P/E ratio is -2.65. In terms of profitability, NS-PA's ROE is +0.28%, compared to TNP-PD's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NS-PA is less volatile compared to TNP-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NS-PA.Check TNP-PD's competition here
NS-PA vs GPP Comparison May 2026
NS-PA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NS-PA stands at 2.8B. In comparison, GPP has a market cap of 286.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NS-PA is priced at $24.99, while GPP trades at $12.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -8.66, whereas GPP's P/E ratio is 7.60. In terms of profitability, NS-PA's ROE is +0.28%, compared to GPP's ROE of +26.63%. Regarding short-term risk, NS-PA is less volatile compared to GPP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NS-PA.Check GPP's competition here
NS-PA vs GLOP Comparison May 2026
NS-PA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NS-PA stands at 2.8B. In comparison, GLOP has a market cap of 277.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NS-PA is priced at $24.99, while GLOP trades at $5.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -8.66, whereas GLOP's P/E ratio is 3.07. In terms of profitability, NS-PA's ROE is +0.28%, compared to GLOP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NS-PA is less volatile compared to GLOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NS-PA.Check GLOP's competition here
NS-PA vs BROG Comparison May 2026
NS-PA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NS-PA stands at 2.8B. In comparison, BROG has a market cap of 232.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NS-PA is priced at $24.99, while BROG trades at $2.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -8.66, whereas BROG's P/E ratio is 52.00. In terms of profitability, NS-PA's ROE is +0.28%, compared to BROG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NS-PA is less volatile compared to BROG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NS-PA.Check BROG's competition here
NS-PA vs DLNG Comparison May 2026
NS-PA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NS-PA stands at 2.8B. In comparison, DLNG has a market cap of 139.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NS-PA is priced at $24.99, while DLNG trades at $3.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -8.66, whereas DLNG's P/E ratio is 2.77. In terms of profitability, NS-PA's ROE is +0.28%, compared to DLNG's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NS-PA is less volatile compared to DLNG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NS-PA.Check DLNG's competition here
NS-PA vs DLNG-PA Comparison May 2026
NS-PA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NS-PA stands at 2.8B. In comparison, DLNG-PA has a market cap of 127.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NS-PA is priced at $24.99, while DLNG-PA trades at $26.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -8.66, whereas DLNG-PA's P/E ratio is 272.44. In terms of profitability, NS-PA's ROE is +0.28%, compared to DLNG-PA's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NS-PA is less volatile compared to DLNG-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NS-PA.Check DLNG-PA's competition here
NS-PA vs MMLP Comparison May 2026
NS-PA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NS-PA stands at 2.8B. In comparison, MMLP has a market cap of 99M. Regarding current trading prices, NS-PA is priced at $24.99, while MMLP trades at $2.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -8.66, whereas MMLP's P/E ratio is -4.96. In terms of profitability, NS-PA's ROE is +0.28%, compared to MMLP's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, NS-PA is less volatile compared to MMLP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NS-PA.Check MMLP's competition here
NS-PA vs DLNG-PB Comparison May 2026
NS-PA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NS-PA stands at 2.8B. In comparison, DLNG-PB has a market cap of 83.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NS-PA is priced at $24.99, while DLNG-PB trades at $25.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -8.66, whereas DLNG-PB's P/E ratio is 22.51. In terms of profitability, NS-PA's ROE is +0.28%, compared to DLNG-PB's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NS-PA is less volatile compared to DLNG-PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NS-PA.Check DLNG-PB's competition here
NS-PA vs BANL Comparison May 2026
NS-PA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NS-PA stands at 2.8B. In comparison, BANL has a market cap of 11.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NS-PA is priced at $24.99, while BANL trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -8.66, whereas BANL's P/E ratio is -3.87. In terms of profitability, NS-PA's ROE is +0.28%, compared to BANL's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NS-PA is less volatile compared to BANL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NS-PA.Check BANL's competition here
NS-PA vs MARPS Comparison May 2026
NS-PA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NS-PA stands at 2.8B. In comparison, MARPS has a market cap of 10M. Regarding current trading prices, NS-PA is priced at $24.99, while MARPS trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -8.66, whereas MARPS's P/E ratio is 13.89. In terms of profitability, NS-PA's ROE is +0.28%, compared to MARPS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NS-PA is less volatile compared to MARPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NS-PA.Check MARPS's competition here
NS-PA vs RBNE Comparison May 2026
NS-PA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NS-PA stands at 2.8B. In comparison, RBNE has a market cap of 3.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NS-PA is priced at $24.99, while RBNE trades at $1.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -8.66, whereas RBNE's P/E ratio is -4.07. In terms of profitability, NS-PA's ROE is +0.28%, compared to RBNE's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NS-PA is less volatile compared to RBNE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NS-PA.Check RBNE's competition here
NS-PA vs PTLE Comparison May 2026
NS-PA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NS-PA stands at 2.8B. In comparison, PTLE has a market cap of 2.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NS-PA is priced at $24.99, while PTLE trades at $4.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -8.66, whereas PTLE's P/E ratio is -1.90. In terms of profitability, NS-PA's ROE is +0.28%, compared to PTLE's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NS-PA is less volatile compared to PTLE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NS-PA.Check PTLE's competition here
NS-PA vs BROGW Comparison May 2026
NS-PA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NS-PA stands at 2.8B. In comparison, BROGW has a market cap of 61.5K. Regarding current trading prices, NS-PA is priced at $24.99, while BROGW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -8.66, whereas BROGW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NS-PA's ROE is +0.28%, compared to BROGW's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NS-PA is less volatile compared to BROGW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NS-PA.Check BROGW's competition here
NS-PA vs EQGP Comparison May 2026
NS-PA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NS-PA stands at 2.8B. In comparison, EQGP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NS-PA is priced at $24.99, while EQGP trades at $19.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -8.66, whereas EQGP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NS-PA's ROE is +0.28%, compared to EQGP's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NS-PA is less volatile compared to EQGP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NS-PA.Check EQGP's competition here
NS-PA vs BPMP Comparison May 2026
NS-PA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NS-PA stands at 2.8B. In comparison, BPMP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NS-PA is priced at $24.99, while BPMP trades at $17.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -8.66, whereas BPMP's P/E ratio is 12.26. In terms of profitability, NS-PA's ROE is +0.28%, compared to BPMP's ROE of +1.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NS-PA is less volatile compared to BPMP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NS-PA.Check BPMP's competition here
NS-PA vs EEQ Comparison May 2026
NS-PA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NS-PA stands at 2.8B. In comparison, EEQ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NS-PA is priced at $24.99, while EEQ trades at $10.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -8.66, whereas EEQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NS-PA's ROE is +0.28%, compared to EEQ's ROE of -32.22%. Regarding short-term risk, NS-PA is more volatile compared to EEQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NS-PA.Check EEQ's competition here
NS-PA vs WPZ Comparison May 2026
NS-PA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NS-PA stands at 2.8B. In comparison, WPZ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NS-PA is priced at $24.99, while WPZ trades at $47.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -8.66, whereas WPZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NS-PA's ROE is +0.28%, compared to WPZ's ROE of -290.33%. Regarding short-term risk, NS-PA is less volatile compared to WPZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NS-PA.Check WPZ's competition here
NS-PA vs SHLX Comparison May 2026
NS-PA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NS-PA stands at 2.8B. In comparison, SHLX has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NS-PA is priced at $24.99, while SHLX trades at $15.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -8.66, whereas SHLX's P/E ratio is 13.07. In terms of profitability, NS-PA's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SHLX's ROE of -56.82%. Regarding short-term risk, NS-PA is less volatile compared to SHLX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NS-PA.Check SHLX's competition here
NS-PA vs VLP Comparison May 2026
NS-PA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NS-PA stands at 2.8B. In comparison, VLP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NS-PA is priced at $24.99, while VLP trades at $42.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -8.66, whereas VLP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NS-PA's ROE is +0.28%, compared to VLP's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NS-PA is more volatile compared to VLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NS-PA.Check VLP's competition here
NS-PA vs ETP Comparison May 2026
NS-PA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NS-PA stands at 2.8B. In comparison, ETP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NS-PA is priced at $24.99, while ETP trades at $16.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -8.66, whereas ETP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NS-PA's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ETP's ROE of +15.78%. Regarding short-term risk, NS-PA is more volatile compared to ETP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NS-PA.Check ETP's competition here
NS-PA vs CPGX Comparison May 2026
NS-PA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NS-PA stands at 2.8B. In comparison, CPGX has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NS-PA is priced at $24.99, while CPGX trades at $25.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -8.66, whereas CPGX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NS-PA's ROE is +0.28%, compared to CPGX's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NS-PA is less volatile compared to CPGX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NS-PA.Check CPGX's competition here