Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (TNP-PF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (TNP-PF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Oil & Gas Midstream Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TNP-PF | $27.05 | -0.39% | 334.2M | -2.84 | -$9.53 | +8.75% |
| ET-PE | $81.43 | +4.82% | 170.2B | 75.82 | $1.07 | +6.58% |
| ENB | $55.31 | -1.62% | 120.8B | 25.61 | $2.16 | +5.03% |
| EP-PC | $50.97 | +0.06% | 113.3B | N/A | N/A | +4.66% |
| WMB | $77.72 | +0.04% | 95.1B | 34.09 | $2.28 | +2.59% |
| EPD | $39.23 | +0.00% | 84.9B | 14.54 | $2.70 | +5.55% |
| KMI | $33.63 | +0.69% | 74.8B | 22.57 | $1.49 | +3.49% |
| TRP | $68.24 | +0.15% | 71.1B | 27.63 | $2.47 | +3.65% |
| ET | $20.15 | -1.03% | 69.4B | 16.80 | $1.20 | +6.58% |
| TRGP | $271.99 | +1.69% | 58.4B | 27.77 | $9.79 | +1.56% |
Stock Comparison
TNP-PF vs ET-PE Comparison May 2026
TNP-PF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNP-PF stands at 334.2M. In comparison, ET-PE has a market cap of 170.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TNP-PF is priced at $27.05, while ET-PE trades at $81.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNP-PF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.84, whereas ET-PE's P/E ratio is 75.82. In terms of profitability, TNP-PF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ET-PE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TNP-PF is less volatile compared to ET-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNP-PF.Check ET-PE's competition here
TNP-PF vs ENB Comparison May 2026
TNP-PF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNP-PF stands at 334.2M. In comparison, ENB has a market cap of 120.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TNP-PF is priced at $27.05, while ENB trades at $55.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNP-PF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.84, whereas ENB's P/E ratio is 25.61. In terms of profitability, TNP-PF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ENB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TNP-PF is less volatile compared to ENB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNP-PF.Check ENB's competition here
TNP-PF vs EP-PC Comparison May 2026
TNP-PF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNP-PF stands at 334.2M. In comparison, EP-PC has a market cap of 113.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TNP-PF is priced at $27.05, while EP-PC trades at $50.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNP-PF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.84, whereas EP-PC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TNP-PF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to EP-PC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TNP-PF is more volatile compared to EP-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNP-PF.Check EP-PC's competition here
TNP-PF vs WMB Comparison May 2026
TNP-PF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNP-PF stands at 334.2M. In comparison, WMB has a market cap of 95.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TNP-PF is priced at $27.05, while WMB trades at $77.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNP-PF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.84, whereas WMB's P/E ratio is 34.09. In terms of profitability, TNP-PF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to WMB's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TNP-PF is less volatile compared to WMB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNP-PF.Check WMB's competition here
TNP-PF vs EPD Comparison May 2026
TNP-PF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNP-PF stands at 334.2M. In comparison, EPD has a market cap of 84.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TNP-PF is priced at $27.05, while EPD trades at $39.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNP-PF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.84, whereas EPD's P/E ratio is 14.54. In terms of profitability, TNP-PF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to EPD's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TNP-PF is less volatile compared to EPD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNP-PF.Check EPD's competition here
TNP-PF vs KMI Comparison May 2026
TNP-PF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNP-PF stands at 334.2M. In comparison, KMI has a market cap of 74.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TNP-PF is priced at $27.05, while KMI trades at $33.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNP-PF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.84, whereas KMI's P/E ratio is 22.57. In terms of profitability, TNP-PF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to KMI's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TNP-PF is less volatile compared to KMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNP-PF.Check KMI's competition here
TNP-PF vs TRP Comparison May 2026
TNP-PF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNP-PF stands at 334.2M. In comparison, TRP has a market cap of 71.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TNP-PF is priced at $27.05, while TRP trades at $68.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNP-PF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.84, whereas TRP's P/E ratio is 27.63. In terms of profitability, TNP-PF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TRP's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TNP-PF is less volatile compared to TRP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNP-PF.Check TRP's competition here
TNP-PF vs ET Comparison May 2026
TNP-PF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNP-PF stands at 334.2M. In comparison, ET has a market cap of 69.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TNP-PF is priced at $27.05, while ET trades at $20.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNP-PF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.84, whereas ET's P/E ratio is 16.80. In terms of profitability, TNP-PF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ET's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TNP-PF is less volatile compared to ET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNP-PF.Check ET's competition here
TNP-PF vs TRGP Comparison May 2026
TNP-PF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNP-PF stands at 334.2M. In comparison, TRGP has a market cap of 58.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TNP-PF is priced at $27.05, while TRGP trades at $271.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNP-PF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.84, whereas TRGP's P/E ratio is 27.77. In terms of profitability, TNP-PF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TRGP's ROE of +0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, TNP-PF is less volatile compared to TRGP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNP-PF.Check TRGP's competition here
TNP-PF vs OKE Comparison May 2026
TNP-PF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNP-PF stands at 334.2M. In comparison, OKE has a market cap of 58.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TNP-PF is priced at $27.05, while OKE trades at $92.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNP-PF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.84, whereas OKE's P/E ratio is 16.46. In terms of profitability, TNP-PF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to OKE's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TNP-PF is less volatile compared to OKE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNP-PF.Check OKE's competition here
TNP-PF vs MPLX Comparison May 2026
TNP-PF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNP-PF stands at 334.2M. In comparison, MPLX has a market cap of 55.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TNP-PF is priced at $27.05, while MPLX trades at $54.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNP-PF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.84, whereas MPLX's P/E ratio is 11.86. In terms of profitability, TNP-PF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MPLX's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, TNP-PF is less volatile compared to MPLX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNP-PF.Check MPLX's competition here
TNP-PF vs LNG Comparison May 2026
TNP-PF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNP-PF stands at 334.2M. In comparison, LNG has a market cap of 50.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TNP-PF is priced at $27.05, while LNG trades at $241.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNP-PF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.84, whereas LNG's P/E ratio is 40.91. In terms of profitability, TNP-PF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LNG's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, TNP-PF is less volatile compared to LNG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNP-PF.Check LNG's competition here
TNP-PF vs ET-PC Comparison May 2026
TNP-PF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNP-PF stands at 334.2M. In comparison, ET-PC has a market cap of 50.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TNP-PF is priced at $27.05, while ET-PC trades at $25.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNP-PF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.84, whereas ET-PC's P/E ratio is 23.81. In terms of profitability, TNP-PF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ET-PC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TNP-PF is more volatile compared to ET-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNP-PF.Check ET-PC's competition here
TNP-PF vs ET-PD Comparison May 2026
TNP-PF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNP-PF stands at 334.2M. In comparison, ET-PD has a market cap of 50.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TNP-PF is priced at $27.05, while ET-PD trades at $25.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNP-PF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.84, whereas ET-PD's P/E ratio is 23.81. In terms of profitability, TNP-PF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ET-PD's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TNP-PF is more volatile compared to ET-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNP-PF.Check ET-PD's competition here
TNP-PF vs ENBA Comparison May 2026
TNP-PF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNP-PF stands at 334.2M. In comparison, ENBA has a market cap of 41.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TNP-PF is priced at $27.05, while ENBA trades at $25.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNP-PF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.84, whereas ENBA's P/E ratio is 24.08. In terms of profitability, TNP-PF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ENBA's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TNP-PF is more volatile compared to ENBA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNP-PF.Check ENBA's competition here
TNP-PF vs ET-PI Comparison May 2026
TNP-PF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNP-PF stands at 334.2M. In comparison, ET-PI has a market cap of 39.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TNP-PF is priced at $27.05, while ET-PI trades at $11.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNP-PF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.84, whereas ET-PI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TNP-PF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ET-PI's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TNP-PF is less volatile compared to ET-PI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNP-PF.Check ET-PI's competition here
TNP-PF vs VG Comparison May 2026
TNP-PF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNP-PF stands at 334.2M. In comparison, VG has a market cap of 34.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TNP-PF is priced at $27.05, while VG trades at $14.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNP-PF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.84, whereas VG's P/E ratio is 14.81. In terms of profitability, TNP-PF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to VG's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, TNP-PF is less volatile compared to VG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNP-PF.Check VG's competition here
TNP-PF vs MPLXP Comparison May 2026
TNP-PF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNP-PF stands at 334.2M. In comparison, MPLXP has a market cap of 33.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TNP-PF is priced at $27.05, while MPLXP trades at $33.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNP-PF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.84, whereas MPLXP's P/E ratio is 11.29. In terms of profitability, TNP-PF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MPLXP's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, TNP-PF is more volatile compared to MPLXP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNP-PF.Check MPLXP's competition here
TNP-PF vs CQP Comparison May 2026
TNP-PF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNP-PF stands at 334.2M. In comparison, CQP has a market cap of 30.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TNP-PF is priced at $27.05, while CQP trades at $63.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNP-PF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.84, whereas CQP's P/E ratio is 14.84. In terms of profitability, TNP-PF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CQP's ROE of +0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, TNP-PF is less volatile compared to CQP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNP-PF.Check CQP's competition here
TNP-PF vs PBA Comparison May 2026
TNP-PF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNP-PF stands at 334.2M. In comparison, PBA has a market cap of 28.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TNP-PF is priced at $27.05, while PBA trades at $48.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNP-PF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.84, whereas PBA's P/E ratio is 25.12. In terms of profitability, TNP-PF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PBA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TNP-PF is less volatile compared to PBA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNP-PF.Check PBA's competition here
TNP-PF vs WES Comparison May 2026
TNP-PF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNP-PF stands at 334.2M. In comparison, WES has a market cap of 18.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TNP-PF is priced at $27.05, while WES trades at $46.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNP-PF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.84, whereas WES's P/E ratio is 15.15. In terms of profitability, TNP-PF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to WES's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, TNP-PF is less volatile compared to WES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNP-PF.Check WES's competition here
TNP-PF vs VNOM Comparison May 2026
TNP-PF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNP-PF stands at 334.2M. In comparison, VNOM has a market cap of 17.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TNP-PF is priced at $27.05, while VNOM trades at $48.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNP-PF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.84, whereas VNOM's P/E ratio is -85.93. In terms of profitability, TNP-PF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to VNOM's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TNP-PF is less volatile compared to VNOM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNP-PF.Check VNOM's competition here
TNP-PF vs PAA Comparison May 2026
TNP-PF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNP-PF stands at 334.2M. In comparison, PAA has a market cap of 16.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TNP-PF is priced at $27.05, while PAA trades at $22.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNP-PF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.84, whereas PAA's P/E ratio is 20.63. In terms of profitability, TNP-PF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PAA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TNP-PF is less volatile compared to PAA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNP-PF.Check PAA's competition here
TNP-PF vs DTM Comparison May 2026
TNP-PF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNP-PF stands at 334.2M. In comparison, DTM has a market cap of 15.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TNP-PF is priced at $27.05, while DTM trades at $148.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNP-PF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.84, whereas DTM's P/E ratio is 32.83. In terms of profitability, TNP-PF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DTM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TNP-PF is less volatile compared to DTM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNP-PF.Check DTM's competition here
TNP-PF vs MMP Comparison May 2026
TNP-PF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNP-PF stands at 334.2M. In comparison, MMP has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TNP-PF is priced at $27.05, while MMP trades at $69.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNP-PF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.84, whereas MMP's P/E ratio is 13.80. In terms of profitability, TNP-PF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MMP's ROE of -8.33%. Regarding short-term risk, TNP-PF is less volatile compared to MMP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNP-PF.Check MMP's competition here
TNP-PF vs AM Comparison May 2026
TNP-PF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNP-PF stands at 334.2M. In comparison, AM has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TNP-PF is priced at $27.05, while AM trades at $21.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNP-PF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.84, whereas AM's P/E ratio is 25.55. In terms of profitability, TNP-PF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AM's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TNP-PF is less volatile compared to AM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNP-PF.Check AM's competition here
TNP-PF vs DCP Comparison May 2026
TNP-PF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNP-PF stands at 334.2M. In comparison, DCP has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TNP-PF is priced at $27.05, while DCP trades at $41.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNP-PF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.84, whereas DCP's P/E ratio is 7.75. In terms of profitability, TNP-PF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DCP's ROE of -351.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TNP-PF is more volatile compared to DCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNP-PF.Check DCP's competition here
TNP-PF vs HESM Comparison May 2026
TNP-PF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNP-PF stands at 334.2M. In comparison, HESM has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TNP-PF is priced at $27.05, while HESM trades at $39.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNP-PF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.84, whereas HESM's P/E ratio is 13.80. In terms of profitability, TNP-PF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HESM's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, TNP-PF is less volatile compared to HESM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNP-PF.Check HESM's competition here
TNP-PF vs FRO Comparison May 2026
TNP-PF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNP-PF stands at 334.2M. In comparison, FRO has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TNP-PF is priced at $27.05, while FRO trades at $36.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNP-PF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.84, whereas FRO's P/E ratio is 21.57. In terms of profitability, TNP-PF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FRO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TNP-PF is less volatile compared to FRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNP-PF.Check FRO's competition here
TNP-PF vs SOBO Comparison May 2026
TNP-PF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNP-PF stands at 334.2M. In comparison, SOBO has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TNP-PF is priced at $27.05, while SOBO trades at $37.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNP-PF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.84, whereas SOBO's P/E ratio is 18.46. In terms of profitability, TNP-PF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SOBO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TNP-PF is less volatile compared to SOBO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNP-PF.Check SOBO's competition here
TNP-PF vs DCP-PC Comparison May 2026
TNP-PF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNP-PF stands at 334.2M. In comparison, DCP-PC has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TNP-PF is priced at $27.05, while DCP-PC trades at $25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNP-PF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.84, whereas DCP-PC's P/E ratio is 57.73. In terms of profitability, TNP-PF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DCP-PC's ROE of -351.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TNP-PF is more volatile compared to DCP-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNP-PF.Check DCP-PC's competition here
TNP-PF vs ENLC Comparison May 2026
TNP-PF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNP-PF stands at 334.2M. In comparison, ENLC has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TNP-PF is priced at $27.05, while ENLC trades at $14.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNP-PF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.84, whereas ENLC's P/E ratio is 64.18. In terms of profitability, TNP-PF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ENLC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TNP-PF is less volatile compared to ENLC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNP-PF.Check ENLC's competition here
TNP-PF vs GLNG Comparison May 2026
TNP-PF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNP-PF stands at 334.2M. In comparison, GLNG has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TNP-PF is priced at $27.05, while GLNG trades at $57.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNP-PF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.84, whereas GLNG's P/E ratio is 95.07. In terms of profitability, TNP-PF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GLNG's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TNP-PF is less volatile compared to GLNG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNP-PF.Check GLNG's competition here
TNP-PF vs ETRN Comparison May 2026
TNP-PF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNP-PF stands at 334.2M. In comparison, ETRN has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TNP-PF is priced at $27.05, while ETRN trades at $12.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNP-PF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.84, whereas ETRN's P/E ratio is 13.80. In terms of profitability, TNP-PF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ETRN's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, TNP-PF is less volatile compared to ETRN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNP-PF.Check ETRN's competition here
TNP-PF vs PAGP Comparison May 2026
TNP-PF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNP-PF stands at 334.2M. In comparison, PAGP has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TNP-PF is priced at $27.05, while PAGP trades at $24.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNP-PF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.84, whereas PAGP's P/E ratio is 31.90. In terms of profitability, TNP-PF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PAGP's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TNP-PF is less volatile compared to PAGP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNP-PF.Check PAGP's competition here
TNP-PF vs STNG Comparison May 2026
TNP-PF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNP-PF stands at 334.2M. In comparison, STNG has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TNP-PF is priced at $27.05, while STNG trades at $82.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNP-PF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.84, whereas STNG's P/E ratio is 8.11. In terms of profitability, TNP-PF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to STNG's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TNP-PF is less volatile compared to STNG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNP-PF.Check STNG's competition here
TNP-PF vs INSW Comparison May 2026
TNP-PF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNP-PF stands at 334.2M. In comparison, INSW has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TNP-PF is priced at $27.05, while INSW trades at $84.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNP-PF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.84, whereas INSW's P/E ratio is 7.70. In terms of profitability, TNP-PF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to INSW's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, TNP-PF is less volatile compared to INSW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNP-PF.Check INSW's competition here
TNP-PF vs KNTK Comparison May 2026
TNP-PF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNP-PF stands at 334.2M. In comparison, KNTK has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TNP-PF is priced at $27.05, while KNTK trades at $51.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNP-PF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.84, whereas KNTK's P/E ratio is 20.43. In terms of profitability, TNP-PF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to KNTK's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TNP-PF is less volatile compared to KNTK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNP-PF.Check KNTK's competition here
TNP-PF vs TRMD Comparison May 2026
TNP-PF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNP-PF stands at 334.2M. In comparison, TRMD has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TNP-PF is priced at $27.05, while TRMD trades at $32.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNP-PF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.84, whereas TRMD's P/E ratio is 11.24. In terms of profitability, TNP-PF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TRMD's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TNP-PF is less volatile compared to TRMD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNP-PF.Check TRMD's competition here
TNP-PF vs EURN Comparison May 2026
TNP-PF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNP-PF stands at 334.2M. In comparison, EURN has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TNP-PF is priced at $27.05, while EURN trades at $16.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNP-PF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.84, whereas EURN's P/E ratio is 2.87. In terms of profitability, TNP-PF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to EURN's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, TNP-PF is less volatile compared to EURN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNP-PF.Check EURN's competition here
TNP-PF vs NGL-PC Comparison May 2026
TNP-PF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNP-PF stands at 334.2M. In comparison, NGL-PC has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TNP-PF is priced at $27.05, while NGL-PC trades at $25.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNP-PF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.84, whereas NGL-PC's P/E ratio is -11.44. In terms of profitability, TNP-PF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NGL-PC's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TNP-PF is less volatile compared to NGL-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNP-PF.Check NGL-PC's competition here
TNP-PF vs NGL-PB Comparison May 2026
TNP-PF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNP-PF stands at 334.2M. In comparison, NGL-PB has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TNP-PF is priced at $27.05, while NGL-PB trades at $25.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNP-PF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.84, whereas NGL-PB's P/E ratio is -11.41. In terms of profitability, TNP-PF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NGL-PB's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TNP-PF is less volatile compared to NGL-PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNP-PF.Check NGL-PB's competition here
TNP-PF vs SUNC Comparison May 2026
TNP-PF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNP-PF stands at 334.2M. In comparison, SUNC has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TNP-PF is priced at $27.05, while SUNC trades at $71.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNP-PF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.84, whereas SUNC's P/E ratio is 7.57. In terms of profitability, TNP-PF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SUNC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TNP-PF is less volatile compared to SUNC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNP-PF.Check SUNC's competition here
TNP-PF vs CEQP Comparison May 2026
TNP-PF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNP-PF stands at 334.2M. In comparison, CEQP has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, TNP-PF is priced at $27.05, while CEQP trades at $28.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNP-PF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.84, whereas CEQP's P/E ratio is 21.91. In terms of profitability, TNP-PF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CEQP's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TNP-PF is less volatile compared to CEQP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNP-PF.Check CEQP's competition here
TNP-PF vs DHT Comparison May 2026
TNP-PF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNP-PF stands at 334.2M. In comparison, DHT has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TNP-PF is priced at $27.05, while DHT trades at $17.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNP-PF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.84, whereas DHT's P/E ratio is 8.56. In terms of profitability, TNP-PF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DHT's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, TNP-PF is less volatile compared to DHT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNP-PF.Check DHT's competition here
TNP-PF vs NS Comparison May 2026
TNP-PF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNP-PF stands at 334.2M. In comparison, NS has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TNP-PF is priced at $27.05, while NS trades at $21.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNP-PF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.84, whereas NS's P/E ratio is 84.46. In terms of profitability, TNP-PF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, TNP-PF is less volatile compared to NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNP-PF.Check NS's competition here
TNP-PF vs NS-PA Comparison May 2026
TNP-PF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNP-PF stands at 334.2M. In comparison, NS-PA has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TNP-PF is priced at $27.05, while NS-PA trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNP-PF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.84, whereas NS-PA's P/E ratio is -8.66. In terms of profitability, TNP-PF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NS-PA's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, TNP-PF is more volatile compared to NS-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNP-PF.Check NS-PA's competition here
TNP-PF vs NS-PB Comparison May 2026
TNP-PF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNP-PF stands at 334.2M. In comparison, NS-PB has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TNP-PF is priced at $27.05, while NS-PB trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNP-PF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.84, whereas NS-PB's P/E ratio is -19.83. In terms of profitability, TNP-PF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NS-PB's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, TNP-PF is more volatile compared to NS-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNP-PF.Check NS-PB's competition here
TNP-PF vs DKL Comparison May 2026
TNP-PF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNP-PF stands at 334.2M. In comparison, DKL has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TNP-PF is priced at $27.05, while DKL trades at $51.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNP-PF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.84, whereas DKL's P/E ratio is 16.35. In terms of profitability, TNP-PF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DKL's ROE of +19.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TNP-PF is less volatile compared to DKL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNP-PF.Check DKL's competition here
TNP-PF vs HEP Comparison May 2026
TNP-PF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNP-PF stands at 334.2M. In comparison, HEP has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TNP-PF is priced at $27.05, while HEP trades at $20.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNP-PF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.84, whereas HEP's P/E ratio is 10.76. In terms of profitability, TNP-PF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HEP's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, TNP-PF is less volatile compared to HEP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNP-PF.Check HEP's competition here
TNP-PF vs SEAL-PB Comparison May 2026
TNP-PF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNP-PF stands at 334.2M. In comparison, SEAL-PB has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TNP-PF is priced at $27.05, while SEAL-PB trades at $25.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNP-PF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.84, whereas SEAL-PB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TNP-PF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SEAL-PB's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TNP-PF is more volatile compared to SEAL-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNP-PF.Check SEAL-PB's competition here
TNP-PF vs SEAL-PA Comparison May 2026
TNP-PF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNP-PF stands at 334.2M. In comparison, SEAL-PA has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TNP-PF is priced at $27.05, while SEAL-PA trades at $25.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNP-PF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.84, whereas SEAL-PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TNP-PF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SEAL-PA's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TNP-PF is more volatile compared to SEAL-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNP-PF.Check SEAL-PA's competition here
TNP-PF vs NS-PC Comparison May 2026
TNP-PF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNP-PF stands at 334.2M. In comparison, NS-PC has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TNP-PF is priced at $27.05, while NS-PC trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNP-PF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.84, whereas NS-PC's P/E ratio is 20.10. In terms of profitability, TNP-PF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NS-PC's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, TNP-PF is more volatile compared to NS-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNP-PF.Check NS-PC's competition here
TNP-PF vs RTLR Comparison May 2026
TNP-PF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNP-PF stands at 334.2M. In comparison, RTLR has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TNP-PF is priced at $27.05, while RTLR trades at $15.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNP-PF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.84, whereas RTLR's P/E ratio is 16.37. In terms of profitability, TNP-PF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RTLR's ROE of -3260.98%. Regarding short-term risk, TNP-PF is less volatile compared to RTLR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNP-PF.Check RTLR's competition here
TNP-PF vs NGL Comparison May 2026
TNP-PF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNP-PF stands at 334.2M. In comparison, NGL has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TNP-PF is priced at $27.05, while NGL trades at $17.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNP-PF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.84, whereas NGL's P/E ratio is -68.54. In terms of profitability, TNP-PF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NGL's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TNP-PF is less volatile compared to NGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNP-PF.Check NGL's competition here
TNP-PF vs NSS Comparison May 2026
TNP-PF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNP-PF stands at 334.2M. In comparison, NSS has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, TNP-PF is priced at $27.05, while NSS trades at $25.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNP-PF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.84, whereas NSS's P/E ratio is -508.80. In terms of profitability, TNP-PF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NSS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, TNP-PF is more volatile compared to NSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNP-PF.Check NSS's competition here
TNP-PF vs GEL Comparison May 2026
TNP-PF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNP-PF stands at 334.2M. In comparison, GEL has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, TNP-PF is priced at $27.05, while GEL trades at $16.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNP-PF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.84, whereas GEL's P/E ratio is -84.69. In terms of profitability, TNP-PF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GEL's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TNP-PF is less volatile compared to GEL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNP-PF.Check GEL's competition here
TNP-PF vs LPG Comparison May 2026
TNP-PF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNP-PF stands at 334.2M. In comparison, LPG has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TNP-PF is priced at $27.05, while LPG trades at $40.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNP-PF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.84, whereas LPG's P/E ratio is 14.43. In terms of profitability, TNP-PF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LPG's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TNP-PF is less volatile compared to LPG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNP-PF.Check LPG's competition here
TNP-PF vs FLNG Comparison May 2026
TNP-PF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNP-PF stands at 334.2M. In comparison, FLNG has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TNP-PF is priced at $27.05, while FLNG trades at $32.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNP-PF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.84, whereas FLNG's P/E ratio is 23.12. In terms of profitability, TNP-PF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FLNG's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TNP-PF is less volatile compared to FLNG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNP-PF.Check FLNG's competition here
TNP-PF vs GLP Comparison May 2026
TNP-PF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNP-PF stands at 334.2M. In comparison, GLP has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TNP-PF is priced at $27.05, while GLP trades at $49.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNP-PF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.84, whereas GLP's P/E ratio is 13.68. In terms of profitability, TNP-PF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GLP's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TNP-PF is less volatile compared to GLP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNP-PF.Check GLP's competition here
TNP-PF vs NVGS Comparison May 2026
TNP-PF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNP-PF stands at 334.2M. In comparison, NVGS has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TNP-PF is priced at $27.05, while NVGS trades at $23.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNP-PF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.84, whereas NVGS's P/E ratio is 14.72. In terms of profitability, TNP-PF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NVGS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TNP-PF is less volatile compared to NVGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNP-PF.Check NVGS's competition here
TNP-PF vs GLOG-PA Comparison May 2026
TNP-PF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNP-PF stands at 334.2M. In comparison, GLOG-PA has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TNP-PF is priced at $27.05, while GLOG-PA trades at $25.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNP-PF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.84, whereas GLOG-PA's P/E ratio is 44.93. In terms of profitability, TNP-PF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GLOG-PA's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TNP-PF is more volatile compared to GLOG-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNP-PF.Check GLOG-PA's competition here
TNP-PF vs PBT Comparison May 2026
TNP-PF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNP-PF stands at 334.2M. In comparison, PBT has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TNP-PF is priced at $27.05, while PBT trades at $29.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNP-PF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.84, whereas PBT's P/E ratio is 93.48. In terms of profitability, TNP-PF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PBT's ROE of +96.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TNP-PF is less volatile compared to PBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNP-PF.Check PBT's competition here
TNP-PF vs TEN Comparison May 2026
TNP-PF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNP-PF stands at 334.2M. In comparison, TEN has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TNP-PF is priced at $27.05, while TEN trades at $42.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNP-PF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.84, whereas TEN's P/E ratio is 9.56. In terms of profitability, TNP-PF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TEN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TNP-PF is less volatile compared to TEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNP-PF.Check TEN's competition here
TNP-PF vs TK Comparison May 2026
TNP-PF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNP-PF stands at 334.2M. In comparison, TK has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TNP-PF is priced at $27.05, while TK trades at $13.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNP-PF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.84, whereas TK's P/E ratio is 11.67. In terms of profitability, TNP-PF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TNP-PF is less volatile compared to TK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNP-PF.Check TK's competition here
TNP-PF vs GLP-PA Comparison May 2026
TNP-PF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNP-PF stands at 334.2M. In comparison, GLP-PA has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, TNP-PF is priced at $27.05, while GLP-PA trades at $43.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNP-PF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.84, whereas GLP-PA's P/E ratio is 21.49. In terms of profitability, TNP-PF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GLP-PA's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TNP-PF is less volatile compared to GLP-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNP-PF.Check GLP-PA's competition here
TNP-PF vs CEQP-P Comparison May 2026
TNP-PF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNP-PF stands at 334.2M. In comparison, CEQP-P has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, TNP-PF is priced at $27.05, while CEQP-P trades at $9.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNP-PF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.84, whereas CEQP-P's P/E ratio is -12.22. In terms of profitability, TNP-PF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CEQP-P's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TNP-PF is less volatile compared to CEQP-P. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNP-PF.Check CEQP-P's competition here
TNP-PF vs TNP-PE Comparison May 2026
TNP-PF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNP-PF stands at 334.2M. In comparison, TNP-PE has a market cap of 991.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TNP-PF is priced at $27.05, while TNP-PE trades at $78.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNP-PF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.84, whereas TNP-PE's P/E ratio is -8.23. In terms of profitability, TNP-PF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TNP-PE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TNP-PF is less volatile compared to TNP-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNP-PF.Check TNP-PE's competition here
TNP-PF vs GLP-PB Comparison May 2026
TNP-PF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNP-PF stands at 334.2M. In comparison, GLP-PB has a market cap of 862.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TNP-PF is priced at $27.05, while GLP-PB trades at $25.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNP-PF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.84, whereas GLP-PB's P/E ratio is 11.22. In terms of profitability, TNP-PF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GLP-PB's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TNP-PF is more volatile compared to GLP-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNP-PF.Check GLP-PB's competition here
TNP-PF vs TEN-PE Comparison May 2026
TNP-PF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNP-PF stands at 334.2M. In comparison, TEN-PE has a market cap of 796.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TNP-PF is priced at $27.05, while TEN-PE trades at $26.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNP-PF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.84, whereas TEN-PE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TNP-PF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TEN-PE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TNP-PF is more volatile compared to TEN-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNP-PF.Check TEN-PE's competition here
TNP-PF vs TNP Comparison May 2026
TNP-PF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNP-PF stands at 334.2M. In comparison, TNP has a market cap of 539.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TNP-PF is priced at $27.05, while TNP trades at $18.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNP-PF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.84, whereas TNP's P/E ratio is 3.69. In terms of profitability, TNP-PF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TNP's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TNP-PF is less volatile compared to TNP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNP-PF.Check TNP's competition here
TNP-PF vs SMC Comparison May 2026
TNP-PF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNP-PF stands at 334.2M. In comparison, SMC has a market cap of 443.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TNP-PF is priced at $27.05, while SMC trades at $32.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNP-PF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.84, whereas SMC's P/E ratio is -17.07. In terms of profitability, TNP-PF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SMC's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TNP-PF is less volatile compared to SMC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNP-PF.Check SMC's competition here
TNP-PF vs GLOP-PC Comparison May 2026
TNP-PF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNP-PF stands at 334.2M. In comparison, GLOP-PC has a market cap of 413.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TNP-PF is priced at $27.05, while GLOP-PC trades at $25.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNP-PF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.84, whereas GLOP-PC's P/E ratio is -58.30. In terms of profitability, TNP-PF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GLOP-PC's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TNP-PF is less volatile compared to GLOP-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNP-PF.Check GLOP-PC's competition here
TNP-PF vs GLOP-PB Comparison May 2026
TNP-PF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNP-PF stands at 334.2M. In comparison, GLOP-PB has a market cap of 410.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TNP-PF is priced at $27.05, while GLOP-PB trades at $25.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNP-PF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.84, whereas GLOP-PB's P/E ratio is -57.92. In terms of profitability, TNP-PF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GLOP-PB's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TNP-PF is more volatile compared to GLOP-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNP-PF.Check GLOP-PB's competition here
TNP-PF vs GLOP-PA Comparison May 2026
TNP-PF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNP-PF stands at 334.2M. In comparison, GLOP-PA has a market cap of 410.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TNP-PF is priced at $27.05, while GLOP-PA trades at $25.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNP-PF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.84, whereas GLOP-PA's P/E ratio is -57.87. In terms of profitability, TNP-PF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GLOP-PA's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TNP-PF is more volatile compared to GLOP-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNP-PF.Check GLOP-PA's competition here
TNP-PF vs SMLP Comparison May 2026
TNP-PF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNP-PF stands at 334.2M. In comparison, SMLP has a market cap of 405.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TNP-PF is priced at $27.05, while SMLP trades at $38.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNP-PF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.84, whereas SMLP's P/E ratio is 5.30. In terms of profitability, TNP-PF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SMLP's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TNP-PF is less volatile compared to SMLP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNP-PF.Check SMLP's competition here
TNP-PF vs DSSI Comparison May 2026
TNP-PF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNP-PF stands at 334.2M. In comparison, DSSI has a market cap of 384.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TNP-PF is priced at $27.05, while DSSI trades at $9.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNP-PF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.84, whereas DSSI's P/E ratio is -6.99. In terms of profitability, TNP-PF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DSSI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TNP-PF is less volatile compared to DSSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNP-PF.Check DSSI's competition here
TNP-PF vs SNMP Comparison May 2026
TNP-PF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNP-PF stands at 334.2M. In comparison, SNMP has a market cap of 338.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TNP-PF is priced at $27.05, while SNMP trades at $1.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNP-PF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.84, whereas SNMP's P/E ratio is -3.91. In terms of profitability, TNP-PF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SNMP's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TNP-PF is less volatile compared to SNMP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNP-PF.Check SNMP's competition here
TNP-PF vs TNP-PD Comparison May 2026
TNP-PF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNP-PF stands at 334.2M. In comparison, TNP-PD has a market cap of 321.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TNP-PF is priced at $27.05, while TNP-PD trades at $25.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNP-PF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.84, whereas TNP-PD's P/E ratio is -2.65. In terms of profitability, TNP-PF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TNP-PD's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TNP-PF is more volatile compared to TNP-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNP-PF.Check TNP-PD's competition here
TNP-PF vs GPP Comparison May 2026
TNP-PF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNP-PF stands at 334.2M. In comparison, GPP has a market cap of 286.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TNP-PF is priced at $27.05, while GPP trades at $12.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNP-PF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.84, whereas GPP's P/E ratio is 7.60. In terms of profitability, TNP-PF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GPP's ROE of +26.63%. Regarding short-term risk, TNP-PF is less volatile compared to GPP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNP-PF.Check GPP's competition here
TNP-PF vs GLOP Comparison May 2026
TNP-PF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNP-PF stands at 334.2M. In comparison, GLOP has a market cap of 277.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TNP-PF is priced at $27.05, while GLOP trades at $5.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNP-PF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.84, whereas GLOP's P/E ratio is 3.07. In terms of profitability, TNP-PF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GLOP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TNP-PF is less volatile compared to GLOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNP-PF.Check GLOP's competition here
TNP-PF vs BROG Comparison May 2026
TNP-PF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNP-PF stands at 334.2M. In comparison, BROG has a market cap of 232.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TNP-PF is priced at $27.05, while BROG trades at $2.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNP-PF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.84, whereas BROG's P/E ratio is 52.00. In terms of profitability, TNP-PF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BROG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TNP-PF is less volatile compared to BROG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNP-PF.Check BROG's competition here
TNP-PF vs DLNG Comparison May 2026
TNP-PF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNP-PF stands at 334.2M. In comparison, DLNG has a market cap of 139.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TNP-PF is priced at $27.05, while DLNG trades at $3.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNP-PF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.84, whereas DLNG's P/E ratio is 2.78. In terms of profitability, TNP-PF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DLNG's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TNP-PF is less volatile compared to DLNG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNP-PF.Check DLNG's competition here
TNP-PF vs DLNG-PA Comparison May 2026
TNP-PF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNP-PF stands at 334.2M. In comparison, DLNG-PA has a market cap of 128.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TNP-PF is priced at $27.05, while DLNG-PA trades at $26.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNP-PF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.84, whereas DLNG-PA's P/E ratio is 273.85. In terms of profitability, TNP-PF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DLNG-PA's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TNP-PF is less volatile compared to DLNG-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNP-PF.Check DLNG-PA's competition here
TNP-PF vs MMLP Comparison May 2026
TNP-PF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNP-PF stands at 334.2M. In comparison, MMLP has a market cap of 106.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TNP-PF is priced at $27.05, while MMLP trades at $2.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNP-PF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.84, whereas MMLP's P/E ratio is -5.35. In terms of profitability, TNP-PF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MMLP's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TNP-PF is less volatile compared to MMLP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNP-PF.Check MMLP's competition here
TNP-PF vs DLNG-PB Comparison May 2026
TNP-PF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNP-PF stands at 334.2M. In comparison, DLNG-PB has a market cap of 83.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TNP-PF is priced at $27.05, while DLNG-PB trades at $25.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNP-PF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.84, whereas DLNG-PB's P/E ratio is 22.51. In terms of profitability, TNP-PF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DLNG-PB's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TNP-PF is more volatile compared to DLNG-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNP-PF.Check DLNG-PB's competition here
TNP-PF vs BANL Comparison May 2026
TNP-PF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNP-PF stands at 334.2M. In comparison, BANL has a market cap of 12.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TNP-PF is priced at $27.05, while BANL trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNP-PF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.84, whereas BANL's P/E ratio is -4.00. In terms of profitability, TNP-PF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BANL's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TNP-PF is less volatile compared to BANL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNP-PF.Check BANL's competition here
TNP-PF vs MARPS Comparison May 2026
TNP-PF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNP-PF stands at 334.2M. In comparison, MARPS has a market cap of 10M. Regarding current trading prices, TNP-PF is priced at $27.05, while MARPS trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNP-PF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.84, whereas MARPS's P/E ratio is 13.94. In terms of profitability, TNP-PF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MARPS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TNP-PF is less volatile compared to MARPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNP-PF.Check MARPS's competition here
TNP-PF vs RBNE Comparison May 2026
TNP-PF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNP-PF stands at 334.2M. In comparison, RBNE has a market cap of 3.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TNP-PF is priced at $27.05, while RBNE trades at $1.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNP-PF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.84, whereas RBNE's P/E ratio is -4.30. In terms of profitability, TNP-PF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RBNE's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TNP-PF is less volatile compared to RBNE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNP-PF.Check RBNE's competition here
TNP-PF vs PTLE Comparison May 2026
TNP-PF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNP-PF stands at 334.2M. In comparison, PTLE has a market cap of 2.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TNP-PF is priced at $27.05, while PTLE trades at $5.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNP-PF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.84, whereas PTLE's P/E ratio is -1.80. In terms of profitability, TNP-PF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PTLE's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TNP-PF is less volatile compared to PTLE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNP-PF.Check PTLE's competition here
TNP-PF vs BROGW Comparison May 2026
TNP-PF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNP-PF stands at 334.2M. In comparison, BROGW has a market cap of 61.5K. Regarding current trading prices, TNP-PF is priced at $27.05, while BROGW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNP-PF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.84, whereas BROGW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TNP-PF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BROGW's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TNP-PF is less volatile compared to BROGW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNP-PF.Check BROGW's competition here
TNP-PF vs ENLK Comparison May 2026
TNP-PF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNP-PF stands at 334.2M. In comparison, ENLK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TNP-PF is priced at $27.05, while ENLK trades at $12.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNP-PF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.84, whereas ENLK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TNP-PF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ENLK's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TNP-PF is more volatile compared to ENLK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNP-PF.Check ENLK's competition here
TNP-PF vs HMLP-PA Comparison May 2026
TNP-PF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNP-PF stands at 334.2M. In comparison, HMLP-PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TNP-PF is priced at $27.05, while HMLP-PA trades at $17.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNP-PF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.84, whereas HMLP-PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TNP-PF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HMLP-PA's ROE of -2.65%. Regarding short-term risk, TNP-PF is less volatile compared to HMLP-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNP-PF.Check HMLP-PA's competition here
TNP-PF vs ETP Comparison May 2026
TNP-PF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNP-PF stands at 334.2M. In comparison, ETP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TNP-PF is priced at $27.05, while ETP trades at $16.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNP-PF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.84, whereas ETP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TNP-PF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ETP's ROE of +15.78%. Regarding short-term risk, TNP-PF is more volatile compared to ETP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNP-PF.Check ETP's competition here
TNP-PF vs PBFX Comparison May 2026
TNP-PF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNP-PF stands at 334.2M. In comparison, PBFX has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TNP-PF is priced at $27.05, while PBFX trades at $19.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNP-PF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.84, whereas PBFX's P/E ratio is 8.22. In terms of profitability, TNP-PF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PBFX's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, TNP-PF is less volatile compared to PBFX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNP-PF.Check PBFX's competition here
TNP-PF vs VLP Comparison May 2026
TNP-PF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNP-PF stands at 334.2M. In comparison, VLP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TNP-PF is priced at $27.05, while VLP trades at $42.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNP-PF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.84, whereas VLP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TNP-PF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to VLP's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TNP-PF is more volatile compared to VLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNP-PF.Check VLP's competition here
TNP-PF vs WPZ Comparison May 2026
TNP-PF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNP-PF stands at 334.2M. In comparison, WPZ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TNP-PF is priced at $27.05, while WPZ trades at $47.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNP-PF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.84, whereas WPZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TNP-PF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to WPZ's ROE of -290.33%. Regarding short-term risk, TNP-PF is less volatile compared to WPZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNP-PF.Check WPZ's competition here
TNP-PF vs CQH Comparison May 2026
TNP-PF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNP-PF stands at 334.2M. In comparison, CQH has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TNP-PF is priced at $27.05, while CQH trades at $32.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNP-PF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.84, whereas CQH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TNP-PF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CQH's ROE of -4.75%. Regarding short-term risk, TNP-PF is less volatile compared to CQH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNP-PF.Check CQH's competition here
TNP-PF vs SEP Comparison May 2026
TNP-PF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNP-PF stands at 334.2M. In comparison, SEP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TNP-PF is priced at $27.05, while SEP trades at $35.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNP-PF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.84, whereas SEP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TNP-PF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SEP's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TNP-PF is more volatile compared to SEP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNP-PF.Check SEP's competition here