Vipshop Holdings Limited

VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 37.7B. In comparison, AMZN has a market cap of 2.3T. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $14.63, while AMZN trades at $213.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas AMZN's P/E ratio is 34.84. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AMZN's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is more volatile compared to AMZN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.

VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 37.7B. In comparison, BABA has a market cap of 287.7B. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $14.63, while BABA trades at $119.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas BABA's P/E ratio is 13.16. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BABA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is more volatile compared to BABA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.

VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 37.7B. In comparison, PDD has a market cap of 142.8B. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $14.63, while PDD trades at $100.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas PDD's P/E ratio is 10.82. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PDD's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is more volatile compared to PDD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.

VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 37.7B. In comparison, MELI has a market cap of 125.9B. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $14.63, while MELI trades at $2,482.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas MELI's P/E ratio is 61.14. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MELI's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is less volatile compared to MELI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.

VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 37.7B. In comparison, SE has a market cap of 98.1B. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $14.63, while SE trades at $165.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas SE's P/E ratio is 115.84. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is less volatile compared to SE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.

VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 37.7B. In comparison, ORLY has a market cap of 78.5B. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $14.63, while ORLY trades at $1,377.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas ORLY's P/E ratio is 33.72. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ORLY's ROE of -1.65%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is more volatile compared to ORLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.

VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 37.7B. In comparison, CVNA has a market cap of 73.1B. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $14.63, while CVNA trades at $341.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas CVNA's P/E ratio is 119.33. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CVNA's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is more volatile compared to CVNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.

VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 37.7B. In comparison, AZO has a market cap of 62.2B. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $14.63, while AZO trades at $3,717.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas AZO's P/E ratio is 25.18. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AZO's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is more volatile compared to AZO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.

VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 37.7B. In comparison, CPNG has a market cap of 51.6B. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $14.63, while CPNG trades at $28.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas CPNG's P/E ratio is 203.25. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CPNG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is more volatile compared to CPNG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.

VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 37.7B. In comparison, JD has a market cap of 47.7B. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $14.63, while JD trades at $33.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas JD's P/E ratio is 8.16. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to JD's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is more volatile compared to JD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.

VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 37.7B. In comparison, EBAY has a market cap of 36.2B. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $14.63, while EBAY trades at $78.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas EBAY's P/E ratio is 18.90. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to EBAY's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is more volatile compared to EBAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.

VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 37.7B. In comparison, TSCO has a market cap of 27B. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $14.63, while TSCO trades at $50.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas TSCO's P/E ratio is 25.22. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TSCO's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is more volatile compared to TSCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.

VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 37.7B. In comparison, ULTA has a market cap of 20.9B. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $14.63, while ULTA trades at $465.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas ULTA's P/E ratio is 18.22. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ULTA's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is more volatile compared to ULTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.

VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 37.7B. In comparison, CHWY has a market cap of 20B. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $14.63, while CHWY trades at $48.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas CHWY's P/E ratio is 53.00. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CHWY's ROE of +0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is more volatile compared to CHWY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.

VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 37.7B. In comparison, WSM has a market cap of 19.4B. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $14.63, while WSM trades at $157.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas WSM's P/E ratio is 18.22. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to WSM's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is more volatile compared to WSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.

VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 37.7B. In comparison, GPC has a market cap of 17.4B. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $14.63, while GPC trades at $125.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas GPC's P/E ratio is 20.57. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to GPC's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is more volatile compared to GPC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.

VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 37.7B. In comparison, CASY has a market cap of 16.5B. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $14.63, while CASY trades at $443.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas CASY's P/E ratio is 30.92. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CASY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is more volatile compared to CASY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.

VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 37.7B. In comparison, BBY has a market cap of 15.5B. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $14.63, while BBY trades at $73.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas BBY's P/E ratio is 17.81. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BBY's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is more volatile compared to BBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.

VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 37.7B. In comparison, DKS has a market cap of 14.5B. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $14.63, while DKS trades at $180.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas DKS's P/E ratio is 12.92. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to DKS's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is more volatile compared to DKS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.

VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 37.7B. In comparison, GME has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $14.63, while GME trades at $29.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas GME's P/E ratio is 89.64. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to GME's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is more volatile compared to GME. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.

VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 37.7B. In comparison, CART has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $14.63, while CART trades at $45.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas CART's P/E ratio is 30.05. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CART's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is more volatile compared to CART. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.

VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 37.7B. In comparison, MUSA has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $14.63, while MUSA trades at $425.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas MUSA's P/E ratio is 18.00. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MUSA's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is more volatile compared to MUSA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.

VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 37.7B. In comparison, FIVE has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $14.63, while FIVE trades at $127.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas FIVE's P/E ratio is 26.64. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to FIVE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is more volatile compared to FIVE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.

VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 37.7B. In comparison, ETSY has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $14.63, while ETSY trades at $63.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas ETSY's P/E ratio is 46.24. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ETSY's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is less volatile compared to ETSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.

VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 37.7B. In comparison, GLBE has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $14.63, while GLBE trades at $34.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas GLBE's P/E ratio is -93.49. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to GLBE's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is more volatile compared to GLBE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.

VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 37.7B. In comparison, W has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $14.63, while W trades at $45.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas W's P/E ratio is -15.94. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to W's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is more volatile compared to W. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.

VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 37.7B. In comparison, BBWI has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $14.63, while BBWI trades at $26.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas BBWI's P/E ratio is 7.16. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BBWI's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is more volatile compared to BBWI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.

VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 37.7B. In comparison, RH has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $14.63, while RH trades at $183.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas RH's P/E ratio is 51.53. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to RH's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is more volatile compared to RH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.

VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 37.7B. In comparison, AAP has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $14.63, while AAP trades at $52.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas AAP's P/E ratio is -5.39. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AAP's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is more volatile compared to AAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.

VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 37.7B. In comparison, ASO has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $14.63, while ASO trades at $43.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas ASO's P/E ratio is 7.58. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ASO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is more volatile compared to ASO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.

VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 37.7B. In comparison, OZON has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $14.63, while OZON trades at $11.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas OZON's P/E ratio is -2.61. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to OZON's ROE of +0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is less volatile compared to OZON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.

VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 37.7B. In comparison, EYE has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $14.63, while EYE trades at $21.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas EYE's P/E ratio is -65.72. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to EYE's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is more volatile compared to EYE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.

VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 37.7B. In comparison, SVV has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $14.63, while SVV trades at $10.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas SVV's P/E ratio is 73.68. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SVV's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is more volatile compared to SVV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.

VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 37.7B. In comparison, RVLV has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $14.63, while RVLV trades at $22.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas RVLV's P/E ratio is 31.81. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to RVLV's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is less volatile compared to RVLV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.

VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 37.7B. In comparison, WINA has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $14.63, while WINA trades at $432.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas WINA's P/E ratio is 38.66. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to WINA's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is more volatile compared to WINA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.

VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 37.7B. In comparison, MNSO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $14.63, while MNSO trades at $18.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas MNSO's P/E ratio is 16.51. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MNSO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is more volatile compared to MNSO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.

VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 37.7B. In comparison, TA has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $14.63, while TA trades at $86.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas TA's P/E ratio is 9.03. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TA's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is more volatile compared to TA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.

VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 37.7B. In comparison, EVGO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $14.63, while EVGO trades at $4.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas EVGO's P/E ratio is -9.76. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to EVGO's ROE of +0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is less volatile compared to EVGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.

VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 37.7B. In comparison, EVGOW has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $14.63, while EVGOW trades at $0.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas EVGOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to EVGOW's ROE of +0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is less volatile compared to EVGOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.

VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 37.7B. In comparison, TANNI has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $14.63, while TANNI trades at $25.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas TANNI's P/E ratio is 35.27. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TANNI's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is more volatile compared to TANNI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.

VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 37.7B. In comparison, TDUP has a market cap of 912.9M. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $14.63, while TDUP trades at $7.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas TDUP's P/E ratio is -26.62. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TDUP's ROE of -0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is less volatile compared to TDUP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.

VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 37.7B. In comparison, OLPX has a market cap of 872.4M. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $14.63, while OLPX trades at $1.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas OLPX's P/E ratio is 65.50. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to OLPX's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is less volatile compared to OLPX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.

VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 37.7B. In comparison, SBH has a market cap of 869.2M. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $14.63, while SBH trades at $8.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas SBH's P/E ratio is 5.10. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SBH's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is more volatile compared to SBH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.

VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 37.7B. In comparison, HEPS has a market cap of 853.3M. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $14.63, while HEPS trades at $2.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas HEPS's P/E ratio is -18.96. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to HEPS's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is more volatile compared to HEPS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.

VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 37.7B. In comparison, RERE has a market cap of 826M. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $14.63, while RERE trades at $2.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas RERE's P/E ratio is 27.56. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to RERE's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is more volatile compared to RERE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.

VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 37.7B. In comparison, LQDT has a market cap of 775.2M. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $14.63, while LQDT trades at $24.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas LQDT's P/E ratio is 31.43. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to LQDT's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is more volatile compared to LQDT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.

VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 37.7B. In comparison, WOOF has a market cap of 769.6M. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $14.63, while WOOF trades at $2.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas WOOF's P/E ratio is -11.56. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to WOOF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is less volatile compared to WOOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.

VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 37.7B. In comparison, OSTK has a market cap of 768M. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $14.63, while OSTK trades at $16.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas OSTK's P/E ratio is -4.64. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to OSTK's ROE of -1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is more volatile compared to OSTK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.

VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 37.7B. In comparison, BBW has a market cap of 631.4M. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $14.63, while BBW trades at $47.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas BBW's P/E ratio is 11.52. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BBW's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is more volatile compared to BBW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.

VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 37.7B. In comparison, YSG has a market cap of 569M. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $14.63, while YSG trades at $6.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas YSG's P/E ratio is -7.71. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to YSG's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is more volatile compared to YSG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.

VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 37.7B. In comparison, HNST has a market cap of 568.8M. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $14.63, while HNST trades at $5.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas HNST's P/E ratio is -258.00. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to HNST's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is more volatile compared to HNST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.

VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 37.7B. In comparison, ODP has a market cap of 534.6M. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $14.63, while ODP trades at $17.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas ODP's P/E ratio is 13.88. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ODP's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is less volatile compared to ODP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.

VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 37.7B. In comparison, ARKO has a market cap of 496.8M. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $14.63, while ARKO trades at $4.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas ARKO's P/E ratio is 145.33. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ARKO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is less volatile compared to ARKO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.

VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 37.7B. In comparison, HZO has a market cap of 482.1M. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $14.63, while HZO trades at $22.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas HZO's P/E ratio is 9.13. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to HZO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is more volatile compared to HZO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.

VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 37.7B. In comparison, BNED has a market cap of 402.3M. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $14.63, while BNED trades at $11.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas BNED's P/E ratio is -0.98. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BNED's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is more volatile compared to BNED. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.

VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 37.7B. In comparison, BYON has a market cap of 373.2M. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $14.63, while BYON trades at $6.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas BYON's P/E ratio is -1.38. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BYON's ROE of -1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is less volatile compared to BYON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.

VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 37.7B. In comparison, CHPT has a market cap of 344.3M. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $14.63, while CHPT trades at $0.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas CHPT's P/E ratio is -1.26. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CHPT's ROE of -1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is less volatile compared to CHPT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.

VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 37.7B. In comparison, FLWS has a market cap of 318.5M. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $14.63, while FLWS trades at $5.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas FLWS's P/E ratio is -1.90. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to FLWS's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is more volatile compared to FLWS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.

VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 37.7B. In comparison, BWMX has a market cap of 298.5M. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $14.63, while BWMX trades at $8.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas BWMX's P/E ratio is -42.11. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BWMX's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is more volatile compared to BWMX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.

VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 37.7B. In comparison, FTCH has a market cap of 254.2M. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $14.63, while FTCH trades at $0.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas FTCH's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to FTCH's ROE of +0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is less volatile compared to FTCH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.

VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 37.7B. In comparison, LE has a market cap of 246.7M. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $14.63, while LE trades at $7.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas LE's P/E ratio is 61.46. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to LE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is less volatile compared to LE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.

VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 37.7B. In comparison, QRTEA has a market cap of 213.5M. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $14.63, while QRTEA trades at $0.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas QRTEA's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to QRTEA's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is more volatile compared to QRTEA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.

VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 37.7B. In comparison, JMIA has a market cap of 206.3M. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $14.63, while JMIA trades at $3.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas JMIA's P/E ratio is -5.35. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to JMIA's ROE of -1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is less volatile compared to JMIA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.

VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 37.7B. In comparison, NEGG has a market cap of 201.7M. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $14.63, while NEGG trades at $10.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas NEGG's P/E ratio is -4.62. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NEGG's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is less volatile compared to NEGG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.

VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 37.7B. In comparison, LOGC has a market cap of 185.2M. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $14.63, while LOGC trades at $6.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas LOGC's P/E ratio is -9.13. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to LOGC's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is less volatile compared to LOGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.

VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 37.7B. In comparison, BZUN has a market cap of 171.4M. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $14.63, while BZUN trades at $2.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas BZUN's P/E ratio is -6.60. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BZUN's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is more volatile compared to BZUN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.

VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 37.7B. In comparison, BARK-WT has a market cap of 161.1M. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $14.63, while BARK-WT trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas BARK-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BARK-WT's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is less volatile compared to BARK-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.

VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 37.7B. In comparison, BARK has a market cap of 159.2M. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $14.63, while BARK trades at $0.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas BARK's P/E ratio is -4.95. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BARK's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is less volatile compared to BARK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.

VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 37.7B. In comparison, WBUY has a market cap of 156.2M. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $14.63, while WBUY trades at $7.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas WBUY's P/E ratio is -0.59. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to WBUY's ROE of -1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is less volatile compared to WBUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.

VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 37.7B. In comparison, VLTA has a market cap of 150M. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $14.63, while VLTA trades at $0.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas VLTA's P/E ratio is -1.30. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to VLTA's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is more volatile compared to VLTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.

VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 37.7B. In comparison, AKA has a market cap of 145.3M. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $14.63, while AKA trades at $13.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas AKA's P/E ratio is -5.67. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AKA's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is more volatile compared to AKA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.

VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 37.7B. In comparison, DADA has a market cap of 130.2M. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $14.63, while DADA trades at $2.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas DADA's P/E ratio is -1.86. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to DADA's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is more volatile compared to DADA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.

VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 37.7B. In comparison, QRTEP has a market cap of 130M. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $14.63, while QRTEP trades at $39.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas QRTEP's P/E ratio is 120.21. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to QRTEP's ROE of +4.53%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is more volatile compared to QRTEP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.

VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 37.7B. In comparison, GOED has a market cap of 129.4M. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $14.63, while GOED trades at $1.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas GOED's P/E ratio is 1.81. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to GOED's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is less volatile compared to GOED. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.

VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 37.7B. In comparison, OCG has a market cap of 118.2M. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $14.63, while OCG trades at $5.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas OCG's P/E ratio is -31.67. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to OCG's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is more volatile compared to OCG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.

VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 37.7B. In comparison, SPWH has a market cap of 115.7M. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $14.63, while SPWH trades at $3.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas SPWH's P/E ratio is -3.11. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SPWH's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is less volatile compared to SPWH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.

VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 37.7B. In comparison, APRN has a market cap of 100M. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $14.63, while APRN trades at $12.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas APRN's P/E ratio is -0.70. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to APRN's ROE of -1.93%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is more volatile compared to APRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.

VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 37.7B. In comparison, DIBS has a market cap of 98.5M. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $14.63, while DIBS trades at $2.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas DIBS's P/E ratio is -5.02. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to DIBS's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is less volatile compared to DIBS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.

VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 37.7B. In comparison, QVCGB has a market cap of 90M. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $14.63, while QVCGB trades at $52.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas QVCGB's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to QVCGB's ROE of +4.53%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is less volatile compared to QVCGB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.

VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 37.7B. In comparison, QVCGP has a market cap of 72.3M. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $14.63, while QVCGP trades at $9.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas QVCGP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to QVCGP's ROE of +4.53%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is less volatile compared to QVCGP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.

VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 37.7B. In comparison, GRWG has a market cap of 70.2M. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $14.63, while GRWG trades at $1.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas GRWG's P/E ratio is -1.40. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to GRWG's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is less volatile compared to GRWG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.

VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 37.7B. In comparison, NHTC has a market cap of 55.2M. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $14.63, while NHTC trades at $4.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas NHTC's P/E ratio is 119.88. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NHTC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is more volatile compared to NHTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.

VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 37.7B. In comparison, PRTS has a market cap of 53.8M. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $14.63, while PRTS trades at $0.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas PRTS's P/E ratio is -1.06. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PRTS's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is less volatile compared to PRTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.

VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 37.7B. In comparison, QRTEB has a market cap of 51.3M. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $14.63, while QRTEB trades at $2.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas QRTEB's P/E ratio is -2.82. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to QRTEB's ROE of +4.53%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is less volatile compared to QRTEB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.

VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 37.7B. In comparison, CTIB has a market cap of 48.2M. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $14.63, while CTIB trades at $2.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas CTIB's P/E ratio is -26.67. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CTIB's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is less volatile compared to CTIB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.

VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 37.7B. In comparison, HOUR has a market cap of 43.7M. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $14.63, while HOUR trades at $1.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas HOUR's P/E ratio is 124.40. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to HOUR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is more volatile compared to HOUR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.

VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 37.7B. In comparison, BBBY has a market cap of 42M. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $14.63, while BBBY trades at $0.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas BBBY's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BBBY's ROE of +2.66%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is less volatile compared to BBBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.

VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 37.7B. In comparison, SSU has a market cap of 36.3M. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $14.63, while SSU trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas SSU's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SSU's ROE of -1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is less volatile compared to SSU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.

VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 37.7B. In comparison, KIRK has a market cap of 29.6M. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $14.63, while KIRK trades at $1.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas KIRK's P/E ratio is -0.75. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to KIRK's ROE of +1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is less volatile compared to KIRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.

VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 37.7B. In comparison, BGFV has a market cap of 28.3M. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $14.63, while BGFV trades at $1.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas BGFV's P/E ratio is -0.35. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BGFV's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is less volatile compared to BGFV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.

VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 37.7B. In comparison, TLF has a market cap of 27.5M. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $14.63, while TLF trades at $3.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas TLF's P/E ratio is 2.16. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TLF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is less volatile compared to TLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.

VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 37.7B. In comparison, QVCGA has a market cap of 25.1M. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $14.63, while QVCGA trades at $3.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas QVCGA's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to QVCGA's ROE of +4.53%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is less volatile compared to QVCGA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.

VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 37.7B. In comparison, JBDI has a market cap of 23.2M. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $14.63, while JBDI trades at $1.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas JBDI's P/E ratio is -23.40. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to JBDI's ROE of -1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is less volatile compared to JBDI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.

VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 37.7B. In comparison, IPW has a market cap of 20.6M. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $14.63, while IPW trades at $0.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas IPW's P/E ratio is -13.12. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to IPW's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is less volatile compared to IPW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.

VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 37.7B. In comparison, CGTL has a market cap of 20.1M. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $14.63, while CGTL trades at $0.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas CGTL's P/E ratio is 4.69. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CGTL's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is more volatile compared to CGTL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.

VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 37.7B. In comparison, BOXD has a market cap of 14M. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $14.63, while BOXD trades at $0.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas BOXD's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BOXD's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is less volatile compared to BOXD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.

VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 37.7B. In comparison, ZKH has a market cap of 13.9M. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $14.63, while ZKH trades at $3.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas ZKH's P/E ratio is -16.16. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ZKH's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is less volatile compared to ZKH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.

VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 37.7B. In comparison, ZOOZ has a market cap of 13.8M. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $14.63, while ZOOZ trades at $1.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas ZOOZ's P/E ratio is -1.05. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ZOOZ's ROE of -1.98%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is more volatile compared to ZOOZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.

VIPS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIPS stands at 37.7B. In comparison, MI has a market cap of 12.1M. Regarding current trading prices, VIPS is priced at $14.63, while MI trades at $2.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIPS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.58, whereas MI's P/E ratio is 1.56. In terms of profitability, VIPS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPS is less volatile compared to MI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPS.