UGRO Capital Limited

UGROCAP.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UGROCAP.NS stands at 12.8B. In comparison, BAJFINANCE.NS has a market cap of 6.4T. Regarding current trading prices, UGROCAP.NS is priced at ₹123.05, while BAJFINANCE.NS trades at ₹1,017.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UGROCAP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas BAJFINANCE.NS's P/E ratio is 35.52. In terms of profitability, UGROCAP.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BAJFINANCE.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, UGROCAP.NS is more volatile compared to BAJFINANCE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UGROCAP.NS.Check BAJFINANCE.NS's competition here

UGROCAP.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UGROCAP.NS stands at 12.8B. In comparison, BAJFINANCE.BO has a market cap of 6.4T. Regarding current trading prices, UGROCAP.NS is priced at ₹123.05, while BAJFINANCE.BO trades at ₹1,014.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UGROCAP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas BAJFINANCE.BO's P/E ratio is 35.49. In terms of profitability, UGROCAP.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BAJFINANCE.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, UGROCAP.NS is more volatile compared to BAJFINANCE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UGROCAP.NS.Check BAJFINANCE.BO's competition here

UGROCAP.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UGROCAP.NS stands at 12.8B. In comparison, SHRIRAMFIN.NS has a market cap of 2T. Regarding current trading prices, UGROCAP.NS is priced at ₹123.05, while SHRIRAMFIN.NS trades at ₹1,054.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UGROCAP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas SHRIRAMFIN.NS's P/E ratio is 21.80. In terms of profitability, UGROCAP.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SHRIRAMFIN.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, UGROCAP.NS is more volatile compared to SHRIRAMFIN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UGROCAP.NS.Check SHRIRAMFIN.NS's competition here

UGROCAP.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UGROCAP.NS stands at 12.8B. In comparison, SHRIRAMFIN.BO has a market cap of 2T. Regarding current trading prices, UGROCAP.NS is priced at ₹123.05, while SHRIRAMFIN.BO trades at ₹1,053.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UGROCAP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas SHRIRAMFIN.BO's P/E ratio is 21.80. In terms of profitability, UGROCAP.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SHRIRAMFIN.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, UGROCAP.NS is more volatile compared to SHRIRAMFIN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UGROCAP.NS.Check SHRIRAMFIN.BO's competition here

UGROCAP.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UGROCAP.NS stands at 12.8B. In comparison, IRFC.BO has a market cap of 1.5T. Regarding current trading prices, UGROCAP.NS is priced at ₹123.05, while IRFC.BO trades at ₹111.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UGROCAP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas IRFC.BO's P/E ratio is 20.88. In terms of profitability, UGROCAP.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to IRFC.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, UGROCAP.NS is more volatile compared to IRFC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UGROCAP.NS.Check IRFC.BO's competition here

UGROCAP.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UGROCAP.NS stands at 12.8B. In comparison, IRFC.NS has a market cap of 1.5T. Regarding current trading prices, UGROCAP.NS is priced at ₹123.05, while IRFC.NS trades at ₹111.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UGROCAP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas IRFC.NS's P/E ratio is 20.87. In terms of profitability, UGROCAP.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to IRFC.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, UGROCAP.NS is more volatile compared to IRFC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UGROCAP.NS.Check IRFC.NS's competition here

UGROCAP.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UGROCAP.NS stands at 12.8B. In comparison, CHOLAFIN.NS has a market cap of 1.4T. Regarding current trading prices, UGROCAP.NS is priced at ₹123.05, while CHOLAFIN.NS trades at ₹1,676.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UGROCAP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas CHOLAFIN.NS's P/E ratio is 29.06. In terms of profitability, UGROCAP.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CHOLAFIN.NS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, UGROCAP.NS is more volatile compared to CHOLAFIN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UGROCAP.NS.Check CHOLAFIN.NS's competition here

UGROCAP.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UGROCAP.NS stands at 12.8B. In comparison, CHOLAFIN.BO has a market cap of 1.4T. Regarding current trading prices, UGROCAP.NS is priced at ₹123.05, while CHOLAFIN.BO trades at ₹1,669.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UGROCAP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas CHOLAFIN.BO's P/E ratio is 29.09. In terms of profitability, UGROCAP.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CHOLAFIN.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, UGROCAP.NS is more volatile compared to CHOLAFIN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UGROCAP.NS.Check CHOLAFIN.BO's competition here

UGROCAP.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UGROCAP.NS stands at 12.8B. In comparison, MUTHOOTFIN.BO has a market cap of 1.4T. Regarding current trading prices, UGROCAP.NS is priced at ₹123.05, while MUTHOOTFIN.BO trades at ₹3,407.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UGROCAP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas MUTHOOTFIN.BO's P/E ratio is 15.94. In terms of profitability, UGROCAP.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MUTHOOTFIN.BO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, UGROCAP.NS is more volatile compared to MUTHOOTFIN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UGROCAP.NS.Check MUTHOOTFIN.BO's competition here

UGROCAP.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UGROCAP.NS stands at 12.8B. In comparison, MUTHOOTFIN.NS has a market cap of 1.4T. Regarding current trading prices, UGROCAP.NS is priced at ₹123.05, while MUTHOOTFIN.NS trades at ₹3,410.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UGROCAP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas MUTHOOTFIN.NS's P/E ratio is 15.94. In terms of profitability, UGROCAP.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MUTHOOTFIN.NS's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, UGROCAP.NS is more volatile compared to MUTHOOTFIN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UGROCAP.NS.Check MUTHOOTFIN.NS's competition here

UGROCAP.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UGROCAP.NS stands at 12.8B. In comparison, PFC.NS has a market cap of 1.4T. Regarding current trading prices, UGROCAP.NS is priced at ₹123.05, while PFC.NS trades at ₹409.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UGROCAP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas PFC.NS's P/E ratio is 5.37. In terms of profitability, UGROCAP.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PFC.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, UGROCAP.NS is more volatile compared to PFC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UGROCAP.NS.Check PFC.NS's competition here

UGROCAP.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UGROCAP.NS stands at 12.8B. In comparison, PFC.BO has a market cap of 1.4T. Regarding current trading prices, UGROCAP.NS is priced at ₹123.05, while PFC.BO trades at ₹409.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UGROCAP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas PFC.BO's P/E ratio is 5.37. In terms of profitability, UGROCAP.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PFC.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, UGROCAP.NS is more volatile compared to PFC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UGROCAP.NS.Check PFC.BO's competition here

UGROCAP.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UGROCAP.NS stands at 12.8B. In comparison, RECLTD.BO has a market cap of 933B. Regarding current trading prices, UGROCAP.NS is priced at ₹123.05, while RECLTD.BO trades at ₹353.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UGROCAP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas RECLTD.BO's P/E ratio is 5.42. In terms of profitability, UGROCAP.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RECLTD.BO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, UGROCAP.NS is more volatile compared to RECLTD.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UGROCAP.NS.Check RECLTD.BO's competition here

UGROCAP.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UGROCAP.NS stands at 12.8B. In comparison, RECLTD.NS has a market cap of 932.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UGROCAP.NS is priced at ₹123.05, while RECLTD.NS trades at ₹353.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UGROCAP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas RECLTD.NS's P/E ratio is 5.42. In terms of profitability, UGROCAP.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RECLTD.NS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, UGROCAP.NS is more volatile compared to RECLTD.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UGROCAP.NS.Check RECLTD.NS's competition here

UGROCAP.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UGROCAP.NS stands at 12.8B. In comparison, SBICARD.BO has a market cap of 747.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UGROCAP.NS is priced at ₹123.05, while SBICARD.BO trades at ₹797.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UGROCAP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas SBICARD.BO's P/E ratio is 35.82. In terms of profitability, UGROCAP.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SBICARD.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, UGROCAP.NS is more volatile compared to SBICARD.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UGROCAP.NS.Check SBICARD.BO's competition here

UGROCAP.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UGROCAP.NS stands at 12.8B. In comparison, SBICARD.NS has a market cap of 747.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UGROCAP.NS is priced at ₹123.05, while SBICARD.NS trades at ₹798.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UGROCAP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas SBICARD.NS's P/E ratio is 35.81. In terms of profitability, UGROCAP.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SBICARD.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, UGROCAP.NS is more volatile compared to SBICARD.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UGROCAP.NS.Check SBICARD.NS's competition here

UGROCAP.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UGROCAP.NS stands at 12.8B. In comparison, LTF.NS has a market cap of 745.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UGROCAP.NS is priced at ₹123.05, while LTF.NS trades at ₹294.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UGROCAP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas LTF.NS's P/E ratio is 26.58. In terms of profitability, UGROCAP.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LTF.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UGROCAP.NS is more volatile compared to LTF.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UGROCAP.NS.Check LTF.NS's competition here

UGROCAP.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UGROCAP.NS stands at 12.8B. In comparison, SUNDARMFIN.BO has a market cap of 579.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UGROCAP.NS is priced at ₹123.05, while SUNDARMFIN.BO trades at ₹5,169.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UGROCAP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas SUNDARMFIN.BO's P/E ratio is 27.90. In terms of profitability, UGROCAP.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SUNDARMFIN.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UGROCAP.NS is more volatile compared to SUNDARMFIN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UGROCAP.NS.Check SUNDARMFIN.BO's competition here

UGROCAP.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UGROCAP.NS stands at 12.8B. In comparison, SUNDARMFIN.NS has a market cap of 570.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UGROCAP.NS is priced at ₹123.05, while SUNDARMFIN.NS trades at ₹5,175.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UGROCAP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas SUNDARMFIN.NS's P/E ratio is 27.70. In terms of profitability, UGROCAP.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SUNDARMFIN.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, UGROCAP.NS is more volatile compared to SUNDARMFIN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UGROCAP.NS.Check SUNDARMFIN.NS's competition here

UGROCAP.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UGROCAP.NS stands at 12.8B. In comparison, M&MFIN.NS has a market cap of 519.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UGROCAP.NS is priced at ₹123.05, while M&MFIN.NS trades at ₹379.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UGROCAP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas M&MFIN.NS's P/E ratio is 21.39. In terms of profitability, UGROCAP.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to M&MFIN.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, UGROCAP.NS is more volatile compared to M&MFIN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UGROCAP.NS.Check M&MFIN.NS's competition here

UGROCAP.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UGROCAP.NS stands at 12.8B. In comparison, L&TFH.NS has a market cap of 410.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UGROCAP.NS is priced at ₹123.05, while L&TFH.NS trades at ₹164.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UGROCAP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas L&TFH.NS's P/E ratio is 39.65. In terms of profitability, UGROCAP.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to L&TFH.NS's ROE of -0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, UGROCAP.NS is more volatile compared to L&TFH.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UGROCAP.NS.Check L&TFH.NS's competition here

UGROCAP.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UGROCAP.NS stands at 12.8B. In comparison, MMFIN.BO has a market cap of 392.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UGROCAP.NS is priced at ₹123.05, while MMFIN.BO trades at ₹282.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UGROCAP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas MMFIN.BO's P/E ratio is 20.81. In terms of profitability, UGROCAP.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MMFIN.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UGROCAP.NS is more volatile compared to MMFIN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UGROCAP.NS.Check MMFIN.BO's competition here

UGROCAP.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UGROCAP.NS stands at 12.8B. In comparison, HUDCO.BO has a market cap of 391.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UGROCAP.NS is priced at ₹123.05, while HUDCO.BO trades at ₹194.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UGROCAP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas HUDCO.BO's P/E ratio is 14.06. In terms of profitability, UGROCAP.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HUDCO.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, UGROCAP.NS is more volatile compared to HUDCO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UGROCAP.NS.Check HUDCO.BO's competition here

UGROCAP.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UGROCAP.NS stands at 12.8B. In comparison, HUDCO.NS has a market cap of 391.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UGROCAP.NS is priced at ₹123.05, while HUDCO.NS trades at ₹194.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UGROCAP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas HUDCO.NS's P/E ratio is 14.06. In terms of profitability, UGROCAP.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HUDCO.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, UGROCAP.NS is more volatile compared to HUDCO.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UGROCAP.NS.Check HUDCO.NS's competition here

UGROCAP.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UGROCAP.NS stands at 12.8B. In comparison, POONAWALLA.BO has a market cap of 380.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UGROCAP.NS is priced at ₹123.05, while POONAWALLA.BO trades at ₹475.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UGROCAP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas POONAWALLA.BO's P/E ratio is 105.64. In terms of profitability, UGROCAP.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to POONAWALLA.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UGROCAP.NS is more volatile compared to POONAWALLA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UGROCAP.NS.Check POONAWALLA.BO's competition here

UGROCAP.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UGROCAP.NS stands at 12.8B. In comparison, POONAWALLA.NS has a market cap of 380.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UGROCAP.NS is priced at ₹123.05, while POONAWALLA.NS trades at ₹474.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UGROCAP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas POONAWALLA.NS's P/E ratio is 105.64. In terms of profitability, UGROCAP.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to POONAWALLA.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UGROCAP.NS is more volatile compared to POONAWALLA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UGROCAP.NS.Check POONAWALLA.NS's competition here

UGROCAP.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UGROCAP.NS stands at 12.8B. In comparison, IREDA.NS has a market cap of 355.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UGROCAP.NS is priced at ₹123.05, while IREDA.NS trades at ₹125.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UGROCAP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas IREDA.NS's P/E ratio is 18.54. In terms of profitability, UGROCAP.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to IREDA.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, UGROCAP.NS is more volatile compared to IREDA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UGROCAP.NS.Check IREDA.NS's competition here

UGROCAP.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UGROCAP.NS stands at 12.8B. In comparison, IREDA.BO has a market cap of 355.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UGROCAP.NS is priced at ₹123.05, while IREDA.BO trades at ₹125.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UGROCAP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas IREDA.BO's P/E ratio is 18.49. In terms of profitability, UGROCAP.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to IREDA.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, UGROCAP.NS is more volatile compared to IREDA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UGROCAP.NS.Check IREDA.BO's competition here

UGROCAP.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UGROCAP.NS stands at 12.8B. In comparison, CHOLAHLDNG.NS has a market cap of 316.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UGROCAP.NS is priced at ₹123.05, while CHOLAHLDNG.NS trades at ₹1,709.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UGROCAP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas CHOLAHLDNG.NS's P/E ratio is 13.35. In terms of profitability, UGROCAP.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CHOLAHLDNG.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UGROCAP.NS is more volatile compared to CHOLAHLDNG.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UGROCAP.NS.Check CHOLAHLDNG.NS's competition here

UGROCAP.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UGROCAP.NS stands at 12.8B. In comparison, CHOLAHLDNG.BO has a market cap of 316.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UGROCAP.NS is priced at ₹123.05, while CHOLAHLDNG.BO trades at ₹1,707.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UGROCAP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas CHOLAHLDNG.BO's P/E ratio is 13.36. In terms of profitability, UGROCAP.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CHOLAHLDNG.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UGROCAP.NS is more volatile compared to CHOLAHLDNG.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UGROCAP.NS.Check CHOLAHLDNG.BO's competition here

UGROCAP.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UGROCAP.NS stands at 12.8B. In comparison, MANAPPURAM.NS has a market cap of 259.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UGROCAP.NS is priced at ₹123.05, while MANAPPURAM.NS trades at ₹305.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UGROCAP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas MANAPPURAM.NS's P/E ratio is 65.35. In terms of profitability, UGROCAP.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MANAPPURAM.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, UGROCAP.NS is more volatile compared to MANAPPURAM.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UGROCAP.NS.Check MANAPPURAM.NS's competition here

UGROCAP.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UGROCAP.NS stands at 12.8B. In comparison, MANAPPURAM.BO has a market cap of 259.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UGROCAP.NS is priced at ₹123.05, while MANAPPURAM.BO trades at ₹304.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UGROCAP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas MANAPPURAM.BO's P/E ratio is 65.31. In terms of profitability, UGROCAP.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MANAPPURAM.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, UGROCAP.NS is more volatile compared to MANAPPURAM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UGROCAP.NS.Check MANAPPURAM.BO's competition here

UGROCAP.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UGROCAP.NS stands at 12.8B. In comparison, IIFL.NS has a market cap of 211.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UGROCAP.NS is priced at ₹123.05, while IIFL.NS trades at ₹497.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UGROCAP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas IIFL.NS's P/E ratio is 16.69. In terms of profitability, UGROCAP.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to IIFL.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UGROCAP.NS is more volatile compared to IIFL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UGROCAP.NS.Check IIFL.NS's competition here

UGROCAP.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UGROCAP.NS stands at 12.8B. In comparison, IIFL.BO has a market cap of 211.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UGROCAP.NS is priced at ₹123.05, while IIFL.BO trades at ₹497.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UGROCAP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas IIFL.BO's P/E ratio is 16.65. In terms of profitability, UGROCAP.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to IIFL.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UGROCAP.NS is more volatile compared to IIFL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UGROCAP.NS.Check IIFL.BO's competition here

UGROCAP.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UGROCAP.NS stands at 12.8B. In comparison, CREDITACC.BO has a market cap of 205.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UGROCAP.NS is priced at ₹123.05, while CREDITACC.BO trades at ₹1,279.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UGROCAP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas CREDITACC.BO's P/E ratio is 42.41. In terms of profitability, UGROCAP.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CREDITACC.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UGROCAP.NS is more volatile compared to CREDITACC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UGROCAP.NS.Check CREDITACC.BO's competition here

UGROCAP.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UGROCAP.NS stands at 12.8B. In comparison, CREDITACC.NS has a market cap of 205.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UGROCAP.NS is priced at ₹123.05, while CREDITACC.NS trades at ₹1,280.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UGROCAP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas CREDITACC.NS's P/E ratio is 42.38. In terms of profitability, UGROCAP.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CREDITACC.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UGROCAP.NS is more volatile compared to CREDITACC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UGROCAP.NS.Check CREDITACC.NS's competition here

UGROCAP.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UGROCAP.NS stands at 12.8B. In comparison, CGCL.BO has a market cap of 166.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UGROCAP.NS is priced at ₹123.05, while CGCL.BO trades at ₹172.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UGROCAP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas CGCL.BO's P/E ratio is 18.57. In terms of profitability, UGROCAP.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CGCL.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, UGROCAP.NS is more volatile compared to CGCL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UGROCAP.NS.Check CGCL.BO's competition here

UGROCAP.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UGROCAP.NS stands at 12.8B. In comparison, CGCL.NS has a market cap of 166.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UGROCAP.NS is priced at ₹123.05, while CGCL.NS trades at ₹172.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UGROCAP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas CGCL.NS's P/E ratio is 18.58. In terms of profitability, UGROCAP.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CGCL.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, UGROCAP.NS is more volatile compared to CGCL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UGROCAP.NS.Check CGCL.NS's competition here

UGROCAP.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UGROCAP.NS stands at 12.8B. In comparison, IFCI.NS has a market cap of 161.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UGROCAP.NS is priced at ₹123.05, while IFCI.NS trades at ₹61.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UGROCAP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas IFCI.NS's P/E ratio is 40.25. In terms of profitability, UGROCAP.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to IFCI.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UGROCAP.NS is more volatile compared to IFCI.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UGROCAP.NS.Check IFCI.NS's competition here

UGROCAP.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UGROCAP.NS stands at 12.8B. In comparison, IFCI.BO has a market cap of 161.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UGROCAP.NS is priced at ₹123.05, while IFCI.BO trades at ₹61.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UGROCAP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas IFCI.BO's P/E ratio is 40.24. In terms of profitability, UGROCAP.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to IFCI.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UGROCAP.NS is more volatile compared to IFCI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UGROCAP.NS.Check IFCI.BO's competition here

UGROCAP.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UGROCAP.NS stands at 12.8B. In comparison, SHRIRAMCIT.NS has a market cap of 148.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UGROCAP.NS is priced at ₹123.05, while SHRIRAMCIT.NS trades at ₹2,210.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UGROCAP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas SHRIRAMCIT.NS's P/E ratio is 10.87. In terms of profitability, UGROCAP.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SHRIRAMCIT.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, UGROCAP.NS is less volatile compared to SHRIRAMCIT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UGROCAP.NS.Check SHRIRAMCIT.NS's competition here

UGROCAP.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UGROCAP.NS stands at 12.8B. In comparison, FIVESTAR.NS has a market cap of 129.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UGROCAP.NS is priced at ₹123.05, while FIVESTAR.NS trades at ₹443.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UGROCAP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas FIVESTAR.NS's P/E ratio is 11.68. In terms of profitability, UGROCAP.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FIVESTAR.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, UGROCAP.NS is more volatile compared to FIVESTAR.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UGROCAP.NS.Check FIVESTAR.NS's competition here

UGROCAP.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UGROCAP.NS stands at 12.8B. In comparison, FIVESTAR.BO has a market cap of 129.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UGROCAP.NS is priced at ₹123.05, while FIVESTAR.BO trades at ₹443.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UGROCAP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas FIVESTAR.BO's P/E ratio is 11.66. In terms of profitability, UGROCAP.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FIVESTAR.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, UGROCAP.NS is more volatile compared to FIVESTAR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UGROCAP.NS.Check FIVESTAR.BO's competition here

UGROCAP.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UGROCAP.NS stands at 12.8B. In comparison, SBFC.BO has a market cap of 105.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UGROCAP.NS is priced at ₹123.05, while SBFC.BO trades at ₹95.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UGROCAP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas SBFC.BO's P/E ratio is 25.16. In terms of profitability, UGROCAP.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SBFC.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, UGROCAP.NS is more volatile compared to SBFC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UGROCAP.NS.Check SBFC.BO's competition here

UGROCAP.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UGROCAP.NS stands at 12.8B. In comparison, SBFC.NS has a market cap of 104.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UGROCAP.NS is priced at ₹123.05, while SBFC.NS trades at ₹95.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UGROCAP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas SBFC.NS's P/E ratio is 24.93. In terms of profitability, UGROCAP.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SBFC.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, UGROCAP.NS is more volatile compared to SBFC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UGROCAP.NS.Check SBFC.NS's competition here

UGROCAP.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UGROCAP.NS stands at 12.8B. In comparison, UJJIVAN.NS has a market cap of 72B. Regarding current trading prices, UGROCAP.NS is priced at ₹123.05, while UJJIVAN.NS trades at ₹591.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UGROCAP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas UJJIVAN.NS's P/E ratio is 8.88. In terms of profitability, UGROCAP.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to UJJIVAN.NS's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, UGROCAP.NS is more volatile compared to UJJIVAN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UGROCAP.NS.Check UJJIVAN.NS's competition here

UGROCAP.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UGROCAP.NS stands at 12.8B. In comparison, UJJIVAN.BO has a market cap of 71.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UGROCAP.NS is priced at ₹123.05, while UJJIVAN.BO trades at ₹590.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UGROCAP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas UJJIVAN.BO's P/E ratio is 8.87. In terms of profitability, UGROCAP.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to UJJIVAN.BO's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, UGROCAP.NS is more volatile compared to UJJIVAN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UGROCAP.NS.Check UJJIVAN.BO's competition here

UGROCAP.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UGROCAP.NS stands at 12.8B. In comparison, MASFIN.BO has a market cap of 60.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UGROCAP.NS is priced at ₹123.05, while MASFIN.BO trades at ₹330.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UGROCAP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas MASFIN.BO's P/E ratio is 17.21. In terms of profitability, UGROCAP.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MASFIN.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, UGROCAP.NS is more volatile compared to MASFIN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UGROCAP.NS.Check MASFIN.BO's competition here

UGROCAP.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UGROCAP.NS stands at 12.8B. In comparison, MASFIN.NS has a market cap of 60.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UGROCAP.NS is priced at ₹123.05, while MASFIN.NS trades at ₹330.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UGROCAP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas MASFIN.NS's P/E ratio is 17.21. In terms of profitability, UGROCAP.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MASFIN.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, UGROCAP.NS is more volatile compared to MASFIN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UGROCAP.NS.Check MASFIN.NS's competition here

UGROCAP.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UGROCAP.NS stands at 12.8B. In comparison, FEDFINA.BO has a market cap of 50.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UGROCAP.NS is priced at ₹123.05, while FEDFINA.BO trades at ₹135.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UGROCAP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas FEDFINA.BO's P/E ratio is 16.02. In terms of profitability, UGROCAP.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FEDFINA.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UGROCAP.NS is more volatile compared to FEDFINA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UGROCAP.NS.Check FEDFINA.BO's competition here

UGROCAP.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UGROCAP.NS stands at 12.8B. In comparison, FEDFINA.NS has a market cap of 50.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UGROCAP.NS is priced at ₹123.05, while FEDFINA.NS trades at ₹134.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UGROCAP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas FEDFINA.NS's P/E ratio is 16.01. In terms of profitability, UGROCAP.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FEDFINA.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UGROCAP.NS is more volatile compared to FEDFINA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UGROCAP.NS.Check FEDFINA.NS's competition here

UGROCAP.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UGROCAP.NS stands at 12.8B. In comparison, EQUITAS.NS has a market cap of 40.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UGROCAP.NS is priced at ₹123.05, while EQUITAS.NS trades at ₹118.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UGROCAP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas EQUITAS.NS's P/E ratio is 15.88. In terms of profitability, UGROCAP.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EQUITAS.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UGROCAP.NS is more volatile compared to EQUITAS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UGROCAP.NS.Check EQUITAS.NS's competition here

UGROCAP.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UGROCAP.NS stands at 12.8B. In comparison, NORTHARC.NS has a market cap of 40.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UGROCAP.NS is priced at ₹123.05, while NORTHARC.NS trades at ₹250.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UGROCAP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas NORTHARC.NS's P/E ratio is 13.16. In terms of profitability, UGROCAP.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NORTHARC.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UGROCAP.NS is more volatile compared to NORTHARC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UGROCAP.NS.Check NORTHARC.NS's competition here

UGROCAP.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UGROCAP.NS stands at 12.8B. In comparison, TFCILTD.BO has a market cap of 34B. Regarding current trading prices, UGROCAP.NS is priced at ₹123.05, while TFCILTD.BO trades at ₹72.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UGROCAP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas TFCILTD.BO's P/E ratio is 27.91. In terms of profitability, UGROCAP.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TFCILTD.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UGROCAP.NS is more volatile compared to TFCILTD.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UGROCAP.NS.Check TFCILTD.BO's competition here

UGROCAP.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UGROCAP.NS stands at 12.8B. In comparison, TFCILTD.NS has a market cap of 33.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UGROCAP.NS is priced at ₹123.05, while TFCILTD.NS trades at ₹72.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UGROCAP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas TFCILTD.NS's P/E ratio is 27.74. In terms of profitability, UGROCAP.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TFCILTD.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UGROCAP.NS is more volatile compared to TFCILTD.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UGROCAP.NS.Check TFCILTD.NS's competition here

UGROCAP.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UGROCAP.NS stands at 12.8B. In comparison, INDOSTAR.NS has a market cap of 31.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UGROCAP.NS is priced at ₹123.05, while INDOSTAR.NS trades at ₹237.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UGROCAP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas INDOSTAR.NS's P/E ratio is 5.73. In terms of profitability, UGROCAP.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to INDOSTAR.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, UGROCAP.NS is more volatile compared to INDOSTAR.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UGROCAP.NS.Check INDOSTAR.NS's competition here

UGROCAP.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UGROCAP.NS stands at 12.8B. In comparison, DHANI.BO has a market cap of 31.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UGROCAP.NS is priced at ₹123.05, while DHANI.BO trades at ₹51.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UGROCAP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas DHANI.BO's P/E ratio is 86.78. In terms of profitability, UGROCAP.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DHANI.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UGROCAP.NS is less volatile compared to DHANI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UGROCAP.NS.Check DHANI.BO's competition here

UGROCAP.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UGROCAP.NS stands at 12.8B. In comparison, INDOSTAR.BO has a market cap of 31.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UGROCAP.NS is priced at ₹123.05, while INDOSTAR.BO trades at ₹237.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UGROCAP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas INDOSTAR.BO's P/E ratio is 5.71. In terms of profitability, UGROCAP.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to INDOSTAR.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, UGROCAP.NS is more volatile compared to INDOSTAR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UGROCAP.NS.Check INDOSTAR.BO's competition here

UGROCAP.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UGROCAP.NS stands at 12.8B. In comparison, PAISALO.NS has a market cap of 31.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UGROCAP.NS is priced at ₹123.05, while PAISALO.NS trades at ₹33.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UGROCAP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas PAISALO.NS's P/E ratio is 14.82. In terms of profitability, UGROCAP.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PAISALO.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, UGROCAP.NS is more volatile compared to PAISALO.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UGROCAP.NS.Check PAISALO.NS's competition here

UGROCAP.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UGROCAP.NS stands at 12.8B. In comparison, PAISALO.BO has a market cap of 31.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UGROCAP.NS is priced at ₹123.05, while PAISALO.BO trades at ₹33.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UGROCAP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas PAISALO.BO's P/E ratio is 14.81. In terms of profitability, UGROCAP.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PAISALO.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, UGROCAP.NS is more volatile compared to PAISALO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UGROCAP.NS.Check PAISALO.BO's competition here

UGROCAP.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UGROCAP.NS stands at 12.8B. In comparison, MUTHOOTMF.NS has a market cap of 30.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UGROCAP.NS is priced at ₹123.05, while MUTHOOTMF.NS trades at ₹184.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UGROCAP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas MUTHOOTMF.NS's P/E ratio is -10.19. In terms of profitability, UGROCAP.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MUTHOOTMF.NS's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UGROCAP.NS is more volatile compared to MUTHOOTMF.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UGROCAP.NS.Check MUTHOOTMF.NS's competition here

UGROCAP.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UGROCAP.NS stands at 12.8B. In comparison, FUSION.NS has a market cap of 22.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UGROCAP.NS is priced at ₹123.05, while FUSION.NS trades at ₹187.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UGROCAP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas FUSION.NS's P/E ratio is -8.15. In terms of profitability, UGROCAP.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FUSION.NS's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, UGROCAP.NS is more volatile compared to FUSION.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UGROCAP.NS.Check FUSION.NS's competition here

UGROCAP.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UGROCAP.NS stands at 12.8B. In comparison, FUSION.BO has a market cap of 22.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UGROCAP.NS is priced at ₹123.05, while FUSION.BO trades at ₹188.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UGROCAP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas FUSION.BO's P/E ratio is -8.05. In terms of profitability, UGROCAP.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FUSION.BO's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, UGROCAP.NS is more volatile compared to FUSION.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UGROCAP.NS.Check FUSION.BO's competition here

UGROCAP.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UGROCAP.NS stands at 12.8B. In comparison, PFS.BO has a market cap of 20.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UGROCAP.NS is priced at ₹123.05, while PFS.BO trades at ₹32.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UGROCAP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas PFS.BO's P/E ratio is 6.17. In terms of profitability, UGROCAP.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PFS.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UGROCAP.NS is more volatile compared to PFS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UGROCAP.NS.Check PFS.BO's competition here

UGROCAP.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UGROCAP.NS stands at 12.8B. In comparison, PFS.NS has a market cap of 20.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UGROCAP.NS is priced at ₹123.05, while PFS.NS trades at ₹32.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UGROCAP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas PFS.NS's P/E ratio is 6.15. In terms of profitability, UGROCAP.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PFS.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UGROCAP.NS is more volatile compared to PFS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UGROCAP.NS.Check PFS.NS's competition here

UGROCAP.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UGROCAP.NS stands at 12.8B. In comparison, MUFIN.NS has a market cap of 20.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UGROCAP.NS is priced at ₹123.05, while MUFIN.NS trades at ₹115.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UGROCAP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas MUFIN.NS's P/E ratio is 108.34. In terms of profitability, UGROCAP.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MUFIN.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UGROCAP.NS is less volatile compared to MUFIN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UGROCAP.NS.Check MUFIN.NS's competition here

UGROCAP.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UGROCAP.NS stands at 12.8B. In comparison, MUFIN.BO has a market cap of 20B. Regarding current trading prices, UGROCAP.NS is priced at ₹123.05, while MUFIN.BO trades at ₹115.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UGROCAP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas MUFIN.BO's P/E ratio is 108.22. In terms of profitability, UGROCAP.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MUFIN.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UGROCAP.NS is less volatile compared to MUFIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UGROCAP.NS.Check MUFIN.BO's competition here

UGROCAP.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UGROCAP.NS stands at 12.8B. In comparison, SPANDANA.BO has a market cap of 18.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UGROCAP.NS is priced at ₹123.05, while SPANDANA.BO trades at ₹261.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UGROCAP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas SPANDANA.BO's P/E ratio is -1.74. In terms of profitability, UGROCAP.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SPANDANA.BO's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, UGROCAP.NS is more volatile compared to SPANDANA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UGROCAP.NS.Check SPANDANA.BO's competition here

UGROCAP.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UGROCAP.NS stands at 12.8B. In comparison, SPANDANA.NS has a market cap of 18.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UGROCAP.NS is priced at ₹123.05, while SPANDANA.NS trades at ₹262.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UGROCAP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas SPANDANA.NS's P/E ratio is -1.74. In terms of profitability, UGROCAP.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SPANDANA.NS's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, UGROCAP.NS is more volatile compared to SPANDANA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UGROCAP.NS.Check SPANDANA.NS's competition here

UGROCAP.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UGROCAP.NS stands at 12.8B. In comparison, ARMANFIN.NS has a market cap of 17.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UGROCAP.NS is priced at ₹123.05, while ARMANFIN.NS trades at ₹1,678.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UGROCAP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas ARMANFIN.NS's P/E ratio is 60.71. In terms of profitability, UGROCAP.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ARMANFIN.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, UGROCAP.NS is more volatile compared to ARMANFIN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UGROCAP.NS.Check ARMANFIN.NS's competition here

UGROCAP.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UGROCAP.NS stands at 12.8B. In comparison, ARMANFIN.BO has a market cap of 17.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UGROCAP.NS is priced at ₹123.05, while ARMANFIN.BO trades at ₹1,685.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UGROCAP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas ARMANFIN.BO's P/E ratio is 60.58. In terms of profitability, UGROCAP.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ARMANFIN.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, UGROCAP.NS is more volatile compared to ARMANFIN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UGROCAP.NS.Check ARMANFIN.BO's competition here

UGROCAP.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UGROCAP.NS stands at 12.8B. In comparison, SATIN.NS has a market cap of 17B. Regarding current trading prices, UGROCAP.NS is priced at ₹123.05, while SATIN.NS trades at ₹153.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UGROCAP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas SATIN.NS's P/E ratio is 8.87. In terms of profitability, UGROCAP.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SATIN.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UGROCAP.NS is more volatile compared to SATIN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UGROCAP.NS.Check SATIN.NS's competition here

UGROCAP.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UGROCAP.NS stands at 12.8B. In comparison, SATIN.BO has a market cap of 17B. Regarding current trading prices, UGROCAP.NS is priced at ₹123.05, while SATIN.BO trades at ₹153.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UGROCAP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas SATIN.BO's P/E ratio is 8.85. In terms of profitability, UGROCAP.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SATIN.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UGROCAP.NS is more volatile compared to SATIN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UGROCAP.NS.Check SATIN.BO's competition here

UGROCAP.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UGROCAP.NS stands at 12.8B. In comparison, MOBIKWIK.BO has a market cap of 16.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UGROCAP.NS is priced at ₹123.05, while MOBIKWIK.BO trades at ₹212.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UGROCAP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas MOBIKWIK.BO's P/E ratio is -12.67. In terms of profitability, UGROCAP.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MOBIKWIK.BO's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, UGROCAP.NS is more volatile compared to MOBIKWIK.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UGROCAP.NS.Check MOBIKWIK.BO's competition here

UGROCAP.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UGROCAP.NS stands at 12.8B. In comparison, MOBIKWIK.NS has a market cap of 16.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UGROCAP.NS is priced at ₹123.05, while MOBIKWIK.NS trades at ₹212.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UGROCAP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas MOBIKWIK.NS's P/E ratio is -12.63. In terms of profitability, UGROCAP.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MOBIKWIK.NS's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, UGROCAP.NS is more volatile compared to MOBIKWIK.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UGROCAP.NS.Check MOBIKWIK.NS's competition here

UGROCAP.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UGROCAP.NS stands at 12.8B. In comparison, UGROCAP.BO has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UGROCAP.NS is priced at ₹123.05, while UGROCAP.BO trades at ₹123.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UGROCAP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas UGROCAP.BO's P/E ratio is 8.56. In terms of profitability, UGROCAP.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to UGROCAP.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UGROCAP.NS is more volatile compared to UGROCAP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UGROCAP.NS.Check UGROCAP.BO's competition here

UGROCAP.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UGROCAP.NS stands at 12.8B. In comparison, CIFL.NS has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UGROCAP.NS is priced at ₹123.05, while CIFL.NS trades at ₹31.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UGROCAP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas CIFL.NS's P/E ratio is 27.45. In terms of profitability, UGROCAP.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CIFL.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UGROCAP.NS is more volatile compared to CIFL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UGROCAP.NS.Check CIFL.NS's competition here

UGROCAP.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UGROCAP.NS stands at 12.8B. In comparison, CIFL.BO has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, UGROCAP.NS is priced at ₹123.05, while CIFL.BO trades at ₹31.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UGROCAP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas CIFL.BO's P/E ratio is 27.27. In terms of profitability, UGROCAP.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CIFL.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UGROCAP.NS is more volatile compared to CIFL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UGROCAP.NS.Check CIFL.BO's competition here

UGROCAP.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UGROCAP.NS stands at 12.8B. In comparison, FINKURVE.BO has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UGROCAP.NS is priced at ₹123.05, while FINKURVE.BO trades at ₹79.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UGROCAP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas FINKURVE.BO's P/E ratio is 50.77. In terms of profitability, UGROCAP.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FINKURVE.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UGROCAP.NS is more volatile compared to FINKURVE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UGROCAP.NS.Check FINKURVE.BO's competition here

UGROCAP.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UGROCAP.NS stands at 12.8B. In comparison, FINKURVE.NS has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UGROCAP.NS is priced at ₹123.05, while FINKURVE.NS trades at ₹79.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UGROCAP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas FINKURVE.NS's P/E ratio is 50.73. In terms of profitability, UGROCAP.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FINKURVE.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UGROCAP.NS is more volatile compared to FINKURVE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UGROCAP.NS.Check FINKURVE.NS's competition here

UGROCAP.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UGROCAP.NS stands at 12.8B. In comparison, VHL.NS has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UGROCAP.NS is priced at ₹123.05, while VHL.NS trades at ₹3,299.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UGROCAP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas VHL.NS's P/E ratio is 4.62. In terms of profitability, UGROCAP.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VHL.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UGROCAP.NS is more volatile compared to VHL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UGROCAP.NS.Check VHL.NS's competition here

UGROCAP.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UGROCAP.NS stands at 12.8B. In comparison, VHL.BO has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UGROCAP.NS is priced at ₹123.05, while VHL.BO trades at ₹3,298.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UGROCAP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas VHL.BO's P/E ratio is 4.34. In terms of profitability, UGROCAP.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VHL.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UGROCAP.NS is more volatile compared to VHL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UGROCAP.NS.Check VHL.BO's competition here

UGROCAP.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UGROCAP.NS stands at 12.8B. In comparison, FEDDERSHOL.BO has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UGROCAP.NS is priced at ₹123.05, while FEDDERSHOL.BO trades at ₹45.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UGROCAP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas FEDDERSHOL.BO's P/E ratio is 12.11. In terms of profitability, UGROCAP.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FEDDERSHOL.BO's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, UGROCAP.NS is more volatile compared to FEDDERSHOL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UGROCAP.NS.Check FEDDERSHOL.BO's competition here

UGROCAP.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UGROCAP.NS stands at 12.8B. In comparison, HEXATRADEX.NS has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UGROCAP.NS is priced at ₹123.05, while HEXATRADEX.NS trades at ₹160.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UGROCAP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas HEXATRADEX.NS's P/E ratio is -99.91. In terms of profitability, UGROCAP.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HEXATRADEX.NS's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UGROCAP.NS is more volatile compared to HEXATRADEX.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UGROCAP.NS.Check HEXATRADEX.NS's competition here

UGROCAP.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UGROCAP.NS stands at 12.8B. In comparison, HEXATRADEX.BO has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, UGROCAP.NS is priced at ₹123.05, while HEXATRADEX.BO trades at ₹162.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UGROCAP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas HEXATRADEX.BO's P/E ratio is -99.36. In terms of profitability, UGROCAP.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HEXATRADEX.BO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UGROCAP.NS is more volatile compared to HEXATRADEX.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UGROCAP.NS.Check HEXATRADEX.BO's competition here

UGROCAP.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UGROCAP.NS stands at 12.8B. In comparison, MANBA.NS has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UGROCAP.NS is priced at ₹123.05, while MANBA.NS trades at ₹124.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UGROCAP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas MANBA.NS's P/E ratio is 14.73. In terms of profitability, UGROCAP.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MANBA.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UGROCAP.NS is more volatile compared to MANBA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UGROCAP.NS.Check MANBA.NS's competition here

UGROCAP.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UGROCAP.NS stands at 12.8B. In comparison, CSLFINANCE.BO has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, UGROCAP.NS is priced at ₹123.05, while CSLFINANCE.BO trades at ₹260.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UGROCAP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas CSLFINANCE.BO's P/E ratio is 7.44. In terms of profitability, UGROCAP.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CSLFINANCE.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, UGROCAP.NS is more volatile compared to CSLFINANCE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UGROCAP.NS.Check CSLFINANCE.BO's competition here

UGROCAP.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UGROCAP.NS stands at 12.8B. In comparison, CSLFINANCE.NS has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, UGROCAP.NS is priced at ₹123.05, while CSLFINANCE.NS trades at ₹261.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UGROCAP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas CSLFINANCE.NS's P/E ratio is 7.38. In terms of profitability, UGROCAP.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CSLFINANCE.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, UGROCAP.NS is more volatile compared to CSLFINANCE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UGROCAP.NS.Check CSLFINANCE.NS's competition here

UGROCAP.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UGROCAP.NS stands at 12.8B. In comparison, LAXMIINDIA.NS has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UGROCAP.NS is priced at ₹123.05, while LAXMIINDIA.NS trades at ₹101.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UGROCAP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas LAXMIINDIA.NS's P/E ratio is 11.98. In terms of profitability, UGROCAP.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LAXMIINDIA.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UGROCAP.NS is more volatile compared to LAXMIINDIA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UGROCAP.NS.Check LAXMIINDIA.NS's competition here

UGROCAP.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UGROCAP.NS stands at 12.8B. In comparison, IFINSEC.BO has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, UGROCAP.NS is priced at ₹123.05, while IFINSEC.BO trades at ₹172.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UGROCAP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas IFINSEC.BO's P/E ratio is 24.15. In terms of profitability, UGROCAP.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to IFINSEC.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UGROCAP.NS is less volatile compared to IFINSEC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UGROCAP.NS.Check IFINSEC.BO's competition here

UGROCAP.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UGROCAP.NS stands at 12.8B. In comparison, NIYOGIN.BO has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, UGROCAP.NS is priced at ₹123.05, while NIYOGIN.BO trades at ₹44.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UGROCAP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas NIYOGIN.BO's P/E ratio is -69.72. In terms of profitability, UGROCAP.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NIYOGIN.BO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UGROCAP.NS is more volatile compared to NIYOGIN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UGROCAP.NS.Check NIYOGIN.BO's competition here

UGROCAP.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UGROCAP.NS stands at 12.8B. In comparison, MUTHOOTCAP.NS has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UGROCAP.NS is priced at ₹123.05, while MUTHOOTCAP.NS trades at ₹233.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UGROCAP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas MUTHOOTCAP.NS's P/E ratio is 31.24. In terms of profitability, UGROCAP.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MUTHOOTCAP.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, UGROCAP.NS is more volatile compared to MUTHOOTCAP.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UGROCAP.NS.Check MUTHOOTCAP.NS's competition here

UGROCAP.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UGROCAP.NS stands at 12.8B. In comparison, MUTHOOTCAP.BO has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UGROCAP.NS is priced at ₹123.05, while MUTHOOTCAP.BO trades at ₹230.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UGROCAP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas MUTHOOTCAP.BO's P/E ratio is 31.08. In terms of profitability, UGROCAP.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MUTHOOTCAP.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UGROCAP.NS is more volatile compared to MUTHOOTCAP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UGROCAP.NS.Check MUTHOOTCAP.BO's competition here

UGROCAP.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UGROCAP.NS stands at 12.8B. In comparison, MANCREDIT.BO has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UGROCAP.NS is priced at ₹123.05, while MANCREDIT.BO trades at ₹174.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UGROCAP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas MANCREDIT.BO's P/E ratio is 29.90. In terms of profitability, UGROCAP.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MANCREDIT.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UGROCAP.NS is more volatile compared to MANCREDIT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UGROCAP.NS.Check MANCREDIT.BO's competition here

UGROCAP.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UGROCAP.NS stands at 12.8B. In comparison, MANCREDIT.NS has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UGROCAP.NS is priced at ₹123.05, while MANCREDIT.NS trades at ₹174.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UGROCAP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas MANCREDIT.NS's P/E ratio is 29.62. In terms of profitability, UGROCAP.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MANCREDIT.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UGROCAP.NS is more volatile compared to MANCREDIT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UGROCAP.NS.Check MANCREDIT.NS's competition here

UGROCAP.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UGROCAP.NS stands at 12.8B. In comparison, MKVENTURES.BO has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UGROCAP.NS is priced at ₹123.05, while MKVENTURES.BO trades at ₹950.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UGROCAP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas MKVENTURES.BO's P/E ratio is 46.93. In terms of profitability, UGROCAP.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MKVENTURES.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UGROCAP.NS is more volatile compared to MKVENTURES.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UGROCAP.NS.Check MKVENTURES.BO's competition here

UGROCAP.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UGROCAP.NS stands at 12.8B. In comparison, PURPLEFIN.BO has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UGROCAP.NS is priced at ₹123.05, while PURPLEFIN.BO trades at ₹65.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UGROCAP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas PURPLEFIN.BO's P/E ratio is -33.93. In terms of profitability, UGROCAP.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PURPLEFIN.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UGROCAP.NS is more volatile compared to PURPLEFIN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UGROCAP.NS.Check PURPLEFIN.BO's competition here

UGROCAP.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UGROCAP.NS stands at 12.8B. In comparison, BOMOXY-B1.BO has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UGROCAP.NS is priced at ₹123.05, while BOMOXY-B1.BO trades at ₹20,400.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UGROCAP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas BOMOXY-B1.BO's P/E ratio is -34.87. In terms of profitability, UGROCAP.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BOMOXY-B1.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, UGROCAP.NS is more volatile compared to BOMOXY-B1.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UGROCAP.NS.Check BOMOXY-B1.BO's competition here

UGROCAP.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UGROCAP.NS stands at 12.8B. In comparison, IITL.BO has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UGROCAP.NS is priced at ₹123.05, while IITL.BO trades at ₹125.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UGROCAP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.52, whereas IITL.BO's P/E ratio is -51.57. In terms of profitability, UGROCAP.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to IITL.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UGROCAP.NS is more volatile compared to IITL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UGROCAP.NS.Check IITL.BO's competition here