CVR Partners, LP
CVR Partners, LP (UAN) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (UAN) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Agricultural Inputs Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UAN | $89.36 | +1.55% | 944.4M | 12.53 | $7.13 | +7.92% |
| CTA-PB | $69.85 | +0.09% | 60.6B | N/A | N/A | +6.43% |
| CTVA | $73.43 | +0.42% | 50.1B | 44.23 | $1.66 | +0.93% |
| NTR | $60.09 | -0.33% | 29.3B | 56.69 | $1.06 | +3.61% |
| CF | $93.30 | -0.21% | 15.1B | 12.34 | $7.56 | +2.14% |
| MOS | $36.90 | -1.31% | 11.7B | 31.81 | $1.16 | +2.33% |
| ICL | $6.80 | -0.51% | 8.8B | 21.95 | $0.31 | +2.70% |
| FMC | $43.21 | +2.18% | 5.4B | 14.08 | $3.07 | +5.38% |
| SMG | $69.39 | +1.48% | 4B | 119.67 | $0.58 | +3.81% |
| IPI | $35.89 | -2.37% | 478.3M | -2.25 | -$15.94 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
UAN vs CTA-PB Comparison July 2025
UAN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAN stands at 944.4M. In comparison, CTA-PB has a market cap of 60.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UAN is priced at $89.36, while CTA-PB trades at $69.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas CTA-PB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UAN's ROE is +0.25%, compared to CTA-PB's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UAN is more volatile compared to CTA-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAN.Check CTA-PB's competition here
UAN vs CTVA Comparison July 2025
UAN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAN stands at 944.4M. In comparison, CTVA has a market cap of 50.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UAN is priced at $89.36, while CTVA trades at $73.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas CTVA's P/E ratio is 44.23. In terms of profitability, UAN's ROE is +0.25%, compared to CTVA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UAN is more volatile compared to CTVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAN.Check CTVA's competition here
UAN vs NTR Comparison July 2025
UAN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAN stands at 944.4M. In comparison, NTR has a market cap of 29.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UAN is priced at $89.36, while NTR trades at $60.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas NTR's P/E ratio is 56.69. In terms of profitability, UAN's ROE is +0.25%, compared to NTR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, UAN is more volatile compared to NTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAN.Check NTR's competition here
UAN vs CF Comparison July 2025
UAN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAN stands at 944.4M. In comparison, CF has a market cap of 15.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UAN is priced at $89.36, while CF trades at $93.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas CF's P/E ratio is 12.34. In terms of profitability, UAN's ROE is +0.25%, compared to CF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, UAN is more volatile compared to CF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAN.Check CF's competition here
UAN vs MOS Comparison July 2025
UAN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAN stands at 944.4M. In comparison, MOS has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UAN is priced at $89.36, while MOS trades at $36.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas MOS's P/E ratio is 31.81. In terms of profitability, UAN's ROE is +0.25%, compared to MOS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, UAN is more volatile compared to MOS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAN.Check MOS's competition here
UAN vs ICL Comparison July 2025
UAN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAN stands at 944.4M. In comparison, ICL has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UAN is priced at $89.36, while ICL trades at $6.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas ICL's P/E ratio is 21.95. In terms of profitability, UAN's ROE is +0.25%, compared to ICL's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UAN is more volatile compared to ICL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAN.Check ICL's competition here
UAN vs FMC Comparison July 2025
UAN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAN stands at 944.4M. In comparison, FMC has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UAN is priced at $89.36, while FMC trades at $43.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas FMC's P/E ratio is 14.08. In terms of profitability, UAN's ROE is +0.25%, compared to FMC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UAN is less volatile compared to FMC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAN.Check FMC's competition here
UAN vs SMG Comparison July 2025
UAN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAN stands at 944.4M. In comparison, SMG has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, UAN is priced at $89.36, while SMG trades at $69.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas SMG's P/E ratio is 119.67. In terms of profitability, UAN's ROE is +0.25%, compared to SMG's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UAN is more volatile compared to SMG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAN.Check SMG's competition here
UAN vs IPI Comparison July 2025
UAN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAN stands at 944.4M. In comparison, IPI has a market cap of 478.3M. Regarding current trading prices, UAN is priced at $89.36, while IPI trades at $35.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas IPI's P/E ratio is -2.25. In terms of profitability, UAN's ROE is +0.25%, compared to IPI's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, UAN is more volatile compared to IPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAN.Check IPI's competition here
UAN vs LVRO Comparison July 2025
UAN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAN stands at 944.4M. In comparison, LVRO has a market cap of 238.7M. Regarding current trading prices, UAN is priced at $89.36, while LVRO trades at $2.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas LVRO's P/E ratio is -1.37. In terms of profitability, UAN's ROE is +0.25%, compared to LVRO's ROE of -0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, UAN is less volatile compared to LVRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAN.Check LVRO's competition here
UAN vs BIOX Comparison July 2025
UAN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAN stands at 944.4M. In comparison, BIOX has a market cap of 235.2M. Regarding current trading prices, UAN is priced at $89.36, while BIOX trades at $3.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas BIOX's P/E ratio is -26.79. In terms of profitability, UAN's ROE is +0.25%, compared to BIOX's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, UAN is more volatile compared to BIOX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAN.Check BIOX's competition here
UAN vs AVD Comparison July 2025
UAN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAN stands at 944.4M. In comparison, AVD has a market cap of 129.8M. Regarding current trading prices, UAN is priced at $89.36, while AVD trades at $3.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas AVD's P/E ratio is -0.77. In terms of profitability, UAN's ROE is +0.25%, compared to AVD's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, UAN is less volatile compared to AVD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAN.Check AVD's competition here
UAN vs MULG Comparison July 2025
UAN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAN stands at 944.4M. In comparison, MULG has a market cap of 49.1M. Regarding current trading prices, UAN is priced at $89.36, while MULG trades at $2.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas MULG's P/E ratio is 18.21. In terms of profitability, UAN's ROE is +0.25%, compared to MULG's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UAN is more volatile compared to MULG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAN.Check MULG's competition here
UAN vs BHIL-WT Comparison July 2025
UAN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAN stands at 944.4M. In comparison, BHIL-WT has a market cap of 49M. Regarding current trading prices, UAN is priced at $89.36, while BHIL-WT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas BHIL-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UAN's ROE is +0.25%, compared to BHIL-WT's ROE of -1.78%. Regarding short-term risk, UAN is less volatile compared to BHIL-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAN.Check BHIL-WT's competition here
UAN vs CGA Comparison July 2025
UAN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAN stands at 944.4M. In comparison, CGA has a market cap of 29.3M. Regarding current trading prices, UAN is priced at $89.36, while CGA trades at $1.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas CGA's P/E ratio is -0.98. In terms of profitability, UAN's ROE is +0.25%, compared to CGA's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, UAN is more volatile compared to CGA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAN.Check CGA's competition here
UAN vs ENFY Comparison July 2025
UAN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAN stands at 944.4M. In comparison, ENFY has a market cap of 15.7M. Regarding current trading prices, UAN is priced at $89.36, while ENFY trades at $0.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas ENFY's P/E ratio is -0.80. In terms of profitability, UAN's ROE is +0.25%, compared to ENFY's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, UAN is less volatile compared to ENFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAN.Check ENFY's competition here
UAN vs NITO Comparison July 2025
UAN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAN stands at 944.4M. In comparison, NITO has a market cap of 8.2M. Regarding current trading prices, UAN is priced at $89.36, while NITO trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas NITO's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, UAN's ROE is +0.25%, compared to NITO's ROE of -1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UAN is less volatile compared to NITO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAN.Check NITO's competition here
UAN vs SEED Comparison July 2025
UAN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAN stands at 944.4M. In comparison, SEED has a market cap of 7.9M. Regarding current trading prices, UAN is priced at $89.36, while SEED trades at $1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas SEED's P/E ratio is -13.78. In terms of profitability, UAN's ROE is +0.25%, compared to SEED's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, UAN is less volatile compared to SEED. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAN.Check SEED's competition here
UAN vs RKDA Comparison July 2025
UAN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAN stands at 944.4M. In comparison, RKDA has a market cap of 5.9M. Regarding current trading prices, UAN is priced at $89.36, while RKDA trades at $4.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas RKDA's P/E ratio is -7.51. In terms of profitability, UAN's ROE is +0.25%, compared to RKDA's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, UAN is less volatile compared to RKDA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAN.Check RKDA's competition here
UAN vs SVFD Comparison July 2025
UAN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAN stands at 944.4M. In comparison, SVFD has a market cap of 4.2M. Regarding current trading prices, UAN is priced at $89.36, while SVFD trades at $1.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas SVFD's P/E ratio is 0.07. In terms of profitability, UAN's ROE is +0.25%, compared to SVFD's ROE of -2.89%. Regarding short-term risk, UAN is less volatile compared to SVFD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAN.Check SVFD's competition here
UAN vs FMTO Comparison July 2025
UAN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAN stands at 944.4M. In comparison, FMTO has a market cap of 3.1M. Regarding current trading prices, UAN is priced at $89.36, while FMTO trades at $3.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas FMTO's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, UAN's ROE is +0.25%, compared to FMTO's ROE of -10.47%. Regarding short-term risk, UAN is less volatile compared to FMTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAN.Check FMTO's competition here
UAN vs BHIL Comparison July 2025
UAN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAN stands at 944.4M. In comparison, BHIL has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, UAN is priced at $89.36, while BHIL trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas BHIL's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, UAN's ROE is +0.25%, compared to BHIL's ROE of -1.78%. Regarding short-term risk, UAN is less volatile compared to BHIL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAN.Check BHIL's competition here
UAN vs YTEN Comparison July 2025
UAN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAN stands at 944.4M. In comparison, YTEN has a market cap of 345.5K. Regarding current trading prices, UAN is priced at $89.36, while YTEN trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas YTEN's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, UAN's ROE is +0.25%, compared to YTEN's ROE of +2.24%. Regarding short-term risk, UAN is less volatile compared to YTEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAN.Check YTEN's competition here
UAN vs CTA-PA Comparison July 2025
UAN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAN stands at 944.4M. In comparison, CTA-PA has a market cap of 11.1K. Regarding current trading prices, UAN is priced at $89.36, while CTA-PA trades at $55.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas CTA-PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UAN's ROE is +0.25%, compared to CTA-PA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UAN is more volatile compared to CTA-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAN.Check CTA-PA's competition here
UAN vs MBII Comparison July 2025
UAN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAN stands at 944.4M. In comparison, MBII has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, UAN is priced at $89.36, while MBII trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas MBII's P/E ratio is -6.82. In terms of profitability, UAN's ROE is +0.25%, compared to MBII's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, UAN is less volatile compared to MBII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAN.Check MBII's competition here