ICL Group Ltd

ICL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ICL stands at 6.8B. In comparison, CTA-PB has a market cap of 59.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ICL is priced at $5.24, while CTA-PB trades at $68.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ICL currently has a P/E ratio of 27.58, whereas CTA-PB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ICL's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CTA-PB's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ICL is more volatile compared to CTA-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICL.Check CTA-PB's competition here

ICL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ICL stands at 6.8B. In comparison, CTVA has a market cap of 54B. Regarding current trading prices, ICL is priced at $5.24, while CTVA trades at $80.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ICL currently has a P/E ratio of 27.58, whereas CTVA's P/E ratio is 45.90. In terms of profitability, ICL's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CTVA's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ICL is less volatile compared to CTVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICL.Check CTVA's competition here

ICL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ICL stands at 6.8B. In comparison, CTA-PA has a market cap of 37B. Regarding current trading prices, ICL is priced at $5.24, while CTA-PA trades at $54.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ICL currently has a P/E ratio of 27.58, whereas CTA-PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ICL's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CTA-PA's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ICL is more volatile compared to CTA-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICL.Check CTA-PA's competition here

ICL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ICL stands at 6.8B. In comparison, NTR has a market cap of 34.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ICL is priced at $5.24, while NTR trades at $70.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ICL currently has a P/E ratio of 27.58, whereas NTR's P/E ratio is 15.16. In terms of profitability, ICL's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NTR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ICL is less volatile compared to NTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICL.Check NTR's competition here

ICL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ICL stands at 6.8B. In comparison, CF has a market cap of 17.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ICL is priced at $5.24, while CF trades at $112.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ICL currently has a P/E ratio of 27.58, whereas CF's P/E ratio is 12.56. In terms of profitability, ICL's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, ICL is less volatile compared to CF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICL.Check CF's competition here

ICL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ICL stands at 6.8B. In comparison, MOS has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ICL is priced at $5.24, while MOS trades at $24.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ICL currently has a P/E ratio of 27.58, whereas MOS's P/E ratio is 14.45. In terms of profitability, ICL's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MOS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ICL is less volatile compared to MOS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICL.Check MOS's competition here

ICL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ICL stands at 6.8B. In comparison, SMG has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ICL is priced at $5.24, while SMG trades at $66.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ICL currently has a P/E ratio of 27.58, whereas SMG's P/E ratio is 23.68. In terms of profitability, ICL's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SMG's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ICL is less volatile compared to SMG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICL.Check SMG's competition here

ICL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ICL stands at 6.8B. In comparison, FMC has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ICL is priced at $5.24, while FMC trades at $17.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ICL currently has a P/E ratio of 27.58, whereas FMC's P/E ratio is -0.98. In terms of profitability, ICL's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FMC's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, ICL is less volatile compared to FMC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICL.Check FMC's competition here

ICL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ICL stands at 6.8B. In comparison, UAN has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ICL is priced at $5.24, while UAN trades at $122.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ICL currently has a P/E ratio of 27.58, whereas UAN's P/E ratio is 13.21. In terms of profitability, ICL's ROE is +0.04%, compared to UAN's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, ICL is less volatile compared to UAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICL.Check UAN's competition here

ICL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ICL stands at 6.8B. In comparison, PURR has a market cap of 794.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ICL is priced at $5.24, while PURR trades at $6.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ICL currently has a P/E ratio of 27.58, whereas PURR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ICL's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PURR's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, ICL is less volatile compared to PURR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICL.Check PURR's competition here

ICL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ICL stands at 6.8B. In comparison, IPI has a market cap of 471.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ICL is priced at $5.24, while IPI trades at $35.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ICL currently has a P/E ratio of 27.58, whereas IPI's P/E ratio is 41.39. In terms of profitability, ICL's ROE is +0.04%, compared to IPI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ICL is less volatile compared to IPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICL.Check IPI's competition here

ICL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ICL stands at 6.8B. In comparison, AVD has a market cap of 75.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ICL is priced at $5.24, while AVD trades at $2.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ICL currently has a P/E ratio of 27.58, whereas AVD's P/E ratio is -1.51. In terms of profitability, ICL's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AVD's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ICL is less volatile compared to AVD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICL.Check AVD's competition here

ICL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ICL stands at 6.8B. In comparison, BHST has a market cap of 75.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ICL is priced at $5.24, while BHST trades at $4.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ICL currently has a P/E ratio of 27.58, whereas BHST's P/E ratio is -7.25. In terms of profitability, ICL's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BHST's ROE of -1.59%. Regarding short-term risk, ICL is less volatile compared to BHST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICL.Check BHST's competition here

ICL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ICL stands at 6.8B. In comparison, MULG has a market cap of 49.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ICL is priced at $5.24, while MULG trades at $2.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ICL currently has a P/E ratio of 27.58, whereas MULG's P/E ratio is 18.21. In terms of profitability, ICL's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MULG's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ICL is more volatile compared to MULG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICL.Check MULG's competition here

ICL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ICL stands at 6.8B. In comparison, BHIL-WT has a market cap of 49M. Regarding current trading prices, ICL is priced at $5.24, while BHIL-WT trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ICL currently has a P/E ratio of 27.58, whereas BHIL-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ICL's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BHIL-WT's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, ICL is less volatile compared to BHIL-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICL.Check BHIL-WT's competition here

ICL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ICL stands at 6.8B. In comparison, FNUC has a market cap of 41.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ICL is priced at $5.24, while FNUC trades at $2.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ICL currently has a P/E ratio of 27.58, whereas FNUC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ICL's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FNUC's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ICL is less volatile compared to FNUC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICL.Check FNUC's competition here

ICL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ICL stands at 6.8B. In comparison, BIOX has a market cap of 37.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ICL is priced at $5.24, while BIOX trades at $0.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ICL currently has a P/E ratio of 27.58, whereas BIOX's P/E ratio is -0.56. In terms of profitability, ICL's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BIOX's ROE of -1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ICL is less volatile compared to BIOX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICL.Check BIOX's competition here

ICL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ICL stands at 6.8B. In comparison, CGA has a market cap of 29.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ICL is priced at $5.24, while CGA trades at $1.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ICL currently has a P/E ratio of 27.58, whereas CGA's P/E ratio is -0.98. In terms of profitability, ICL's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CGA's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ICL is more volatile compared to CGA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICL.Check CGA's competition here

ICL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ICL stands at 6.8B. In comparison, LVRO has a market cap of 15.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ICL is priced at $5.24, while LVRO trades at $0.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ICL currently has a P/E ratio of 27.58, whereas LVRO's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, ICL's ROE is +0.04%, compared to LVRO's ROE of -1.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ICL is more volatile compared to LVRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICL.Check LVRO's competition here

ICL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ICL stands at 6.8B. In comparison, SEED has a market cap of 9.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ICL is priced at $5.24, while SEED trades at $1.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ICL currently has a P/E ratio of 27.58, whereas SEED's P/E ratio is -1.23. In terms of profitability, ICL's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SEED's ROE of +1.86%. Regarding short-term risk, ICL is less volatile compared to SEED. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICL.Check SEED's competition here

ICL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ICL stands at 6.8B. In comparison, AGRZ has a market cap of 8M. Regarding current trading prices, ICL is priced at $5.24, while AGRZ trades at $0.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ICL currently has a P/E ratio of 27.58, whereas AGRZ's P/E ratio is 4.11. In terms of profitability, ICL's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AGRZ's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, ICL is less volatile compared to AGRZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICL.Check AGRZ's competition here

ICL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ICL stands at 6.8B. In comparison, SVFD has a market cap of 4.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ICL is priced at $5.24, while SVFD trades at $1.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ICL currently has a P/E ratio of 27.58, whereas SVFD's P/E ratio is 0.07. In terms of profitability, ICL's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SVFD's ROE of -462.29%. Regarding short-term risk, ICL is less volatile compared to SVFD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICL.Check SVFD's competition here

ICL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ICL stands at 6.8B. In comparison, NITO has a market cap of 3.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ICL is priced at $5.24, while NITO trades at $4.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ICL currently has a P/E ratio of 27.58, whereas NITO's P/E ratio is -0.32. In terms of profitability, ICL's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NITO's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, ICL is less volatile compared to NITO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICL.Check NITO's competition here

ICL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ICL stands at 6.8B. In comparison, FMTO has a market cap of 3.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ICL is priced at $5.24, while FMTO trades at $3.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ICL currently has a P/E ratio of 27.58, whereas FMTO's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, ICL's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FMTO's ROE of +75.78%. Regarding short-term risk, ICL is less volatile compared to FMTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICL.Check FMTO's competition here

ICL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ICL stands at 6.8B. In comparison, RKDA has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ICL is priced at $5.24, while RKDA trades at $1.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ICL currently has a P/E ratio of 27.58, whereas RKDA's P/E ratio is -0.68. In terms of profitability, ICL's ROE is +0.04%, compared to RKDA's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, ICL is less volatile compared to RKDA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICL.Check RKDA's competition here

ICL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ICL stands at 6.8B. In comparison, BHIL has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ICL is priced at $5.24, while BHIL trades at $0.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ICL currently has a P/E ratio of 27.58, whereas BHIL's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, ICL's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BHIL's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, ICL is more volatile compared to BHIL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICL.Check BHIL's competition here

ICL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ICL stands at 6.8B. In comparison, YTEN has a market cap of 345.5K. Regarding current trading prices, ICL is priced at $5.24, while YTEN trades at $0.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ICL currently has a P/E ratio of 27.58, whereas YTEN's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, ICL's ROE is +0.04%, compared to YTEN's ROE of -15.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ICL is less volatile compared to YTEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICL.Check YTEN's competition here

ICL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ICL stands at 6.8B. In comparison, MBII has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ICL is priced at $5.24, while MBII trades at $0.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ICL currently has a P/E ratio of 27.58, whereas MBII's P/E ratio is -6.82. In terms of profitability, ICL's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MBII's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, ICL is less volatile compared to MBII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICL.Check MBII's competition here

ICL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ICL stands at 6.8B. In comparison, TNH has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ICL is priced at $5.24, while TNH trades at $83.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ICL currently has a P/E ratio of 27.58, whereas TNH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ICL's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TNH's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, ICL is more volatile compared to TNH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICL.Check TNH's competition here