Nexentis Technologies Inc. (NASDAQ: NITO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

Nexentis Technologies Inc. (NASDAQ: NITO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NITO stands at 2.9M. In comparison, SHLM has a market cap of 26.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NITO is priced at $3.06 on the NASDAQ, while SHLM trades at $44.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NITO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.24, whereas SHLM's P/E ratio is 42.74. In terms of profitability, NITO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to SHLM's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NITO is more volatile compared to SHLM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NITO.Check SHLM's competition here

Nexentis Technologies Inc. (NASDAQ: NITO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NITO stands at 2.9M. In comparison, DOW has a market cap of 21B. Regarding current trading prices, NITO is priced at $3.06 on the NASDAQ, while DOW trades at $29.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NITO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.24, whereas DOW's P/E ratio is -26.62. In terms of profitability, NITO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to DOW's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NITO is more volatile compared to DOW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NITO.Check DOW's competition here

Nexentis Technologies Inc. (NASDAQ: NITO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NITO stands at 2.9M. In comparison, DD has a market cap of 17.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NITO is priced at $3.06 on the NASDAQ, while DD trades at $126.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NITO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.24, whereas DD's P/E ratio is 24.99. In terms of profitability, NITO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to DD's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NITO is more volatile compared to DD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NITO.Check DD's competition here

Nexentis Technologies Inc. (NASDAQ: NITO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NITO stands at 2.9M. In comparison, SSL has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NITO is priced at $3.06 on the NASDAQ, while SSL trades at $14.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NITO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.24, whereas SSL's P/E ratio is 19.03. In terms of profitability, NITO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to SSL's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NITO is more volatile compared to SSL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NITO.Check SSL's competition here

Nexentis Technologies Inc. (NASDAQ: NITO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NITO stands at 2.9M. In comparison, UNVR has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NITO is priced at $3.06 on the NASDAQ, while UNVR trades at $36.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NITO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.24, whereas UNVR's P/E ratio is 13.29. In terms of profitability, NITO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to UNVR's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, NITO is more volatile compared to UNVR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NITO.Check UNVR's competition here

Nexentis Technologies Inc. (NASDAQ: NITO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NITO stands at 2.9M. In comparison, CE has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NITO is priced at $3.06 on the NASDAQ, while CE trades at $46.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NITO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.24, whereas CE's P/E ratio is 8.68. In terms of profitability, NITO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to CE's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, NITO is more volatile compared to CE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NITO.Check CE's competition here

Nexentis Technologies Inc. (NASDAQ: NITO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NITO stands at 2.9M. In comparison, MEOH has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NITO is priced at $3.06 on the NASDAQ, while MEOH trades at $62.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NITO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.24, whereas MEOH's P/E ratio is 52.86. In terms of profitability, NITO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to MEOH's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NITO is more volatile compared to MEOH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NITO.Check MEOH's competition here

Nexentis Technologies Inc. (NASDAQ: NITO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NITO stands at 2.9M. In comparison, OLN has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, NITO is priced at $3.06 on the NASDAQ, while OLN trades at $17.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NITO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.24, whereas OLN's P/E ratio is -22.04. In terms of profitability, NITO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to OLN's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NITO is more volatile compared to OLN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NITO.Check OLN's competition here

Nexentis Technologies Inc. (NASDAQ: NITO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NITO stands at 2.9M. In comparison, HUN has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NITO is priced at $3.06 on the NASDAQ, while HUN trades at $9.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NITO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.24, whereas HUN's P/E ratio is -11.92. In terms of profitability, NITO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to HUN's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NITO is more volatile compared to HUN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NITO.Check HUN's competition here

Nexentis Technologies Inc. (NASDAQ: NITO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NITO stands at 2.9M. In comparison, AACQU has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NITO is priced at $3.06 on the NASDAQ, while AACQU trades at $11.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NITO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.24, whereas AACQU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NITO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to AACQU's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NITO is more volatile compared to AACQU. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NITO.Check AACQU's competition here

Nexentis Technologies Inc. (NASDAQ: NITO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NITO stands at 2.9M. In comparison, REX has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NITO is priced at $3.06 on the NASDAQ, while REX trades at $41.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NITO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.24, whereas REX's P/E ratio is 11.40. In terms of profitability, NITO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to REX's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NITO is more volatile compared to REX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NITO.Check REX's competition here

Nexentis Technologies Inc. (NASDAQ: NITO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NITO stands at 2.9M. In comparison, GPRE has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, NITO is priced at $3.06 on the NASDAQ, while GPRE trades at $14.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NITO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.24, whereas GPRE's P/E ratio is 8.42. In terms of profitability, NITO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to GPRE's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NITO is more volatile compared to GPRE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NITO.Check GPRE's competition here

Nexentis Technologies Inc. (NASDAQ: NITO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NITO stands at 2.9M. In comparison, LXU has a market cap of 832.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NITO is priced at $3.06 on the NASDAQ, while LXU trades at $11.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NITO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.24, whereas LXU's P/E ratio is 23.14. In terms of profitability, NITO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to LXU's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NITO is more volatile compared to LXU. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NITO.Check LXU's competition here

Nexentis Technologies Inc. (NASDAQ: NITO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NITO stands at 2.9M. In comparison, BAK has a market cap of 830.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NITO is priced at $3.06 on the NASDAQ, while BAK trades at $2.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NITO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.24, whereas BAK's P/E ratio is 29.37. In terms of profitability, NITO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to BAK's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, NITO is more volatile compared to BAK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NITO.Check BAK's competition here

Nexentis Technologies Inc. (NASDAQ: NITO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NITO stands at 2.9M. In comparison, WLKP has a market cap of 757.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NITO is priced at $3.06 on the NASDAQ, while WLKP trades at $21.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NITO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.24, whereas WLKP's P/E ratio is 13.18. In terms of profitability, NITO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to WLKP's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NITO is more volatile compared to WLKP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NITO.Check WLKP's competition here

Nexentis Technologies Inc. (NASDAQ: NITO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NITO stands at 2.9M. In comparison, TROX has a market cap of 706.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NITO is priced at $3.06 on the NASDAQ, while TROX trades at $4.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NITO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.24, whereas TROX's P/E ratio is -2.09. In terms of profitability, NITO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to TROX's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, NITO is more volatile compared to TROX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NITO.Check TROX's competition here

Nexentis Technologies Inc. (NASDAQ: NITO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NITO stands at 2.9M. In comparison, VHI has a market cap of 513.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NITO is priced at $3.06 on the NASDAQ, while VHI trades at $18.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NITO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.24, whereas VHI's P/E ratio is -10.14. In terms of profitability, NITO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to VHI's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NITO is more volatile compared to VHI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NITO.Check VHI's competition here

Nexentis Technologies Inc. (NASDAQ: NITO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NITO stands at 2.9M. In comparison, SIRE has a market cap of 501.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NITO is priced at $3.06 on the NASDAQ, while SIRE trades at $25.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NITO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.24, whereas SIRE's P/E ratio is 7.58. In terms of profitability, NITO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to SIRE's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, NITO is more volatile compared to SIRE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NITO.Check SIRE's competition here

Nexentis Technologies Inc. (NASDAQ: NITO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NITO stands at 2.9M. In comparison, CINR has a market cap of 402.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NITO is priced at $3.06 on the NASDAQ, while CINR trades at $20.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NITO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.24, whereas CINR's P/E ratio is 21.93. In terms of profitability, NITO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to CINR's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, NITO is more volatile compared to CINR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NITO.Check CINR's competition here

Nexentis Technologies Inc. (NASDAQ: NITO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NITO stands at 2.9M. In comparison, NPT has a market cap of 63.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NITO is priced at $3.06 on the NASDAQ, while NPT trades at $2.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NITO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.24, whereas NPT's P/E ratio is -71.50. In terms of profitability, NITO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to NPT's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, NITO is more volatile compared to NPT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NITO.Check NPT's competition here

Nexentis Technologies Inc. (NASDAQ: NITO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NITO stands at 2.9M. In comparison, GURE has a market cap of 4.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NITO is priced at $3.06 on the NASDAQ, while GURE trades at $3.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NITO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.24, whereas GURE's P/E ratio is -0.68. In terms of profitability, NITO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to GURE's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, NITO is more volatile compared to GURE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NITO.Check GURE's competition here

Nexentis Technologies Inc. (NASDAQ: NITO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NITO stands at 2.9M. In comparison, ORGNW has a market cap of 14.7K. Regarding current trading prices, NITO is priced at $3.06 on the NASDAQ, while ORGNW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NITO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.24, whereas ORGNW's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, NITO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to ORGNW's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NITO is less volatile compared to ORGNW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NITO.Check ORGNW's competition here

Nexentis Technologies Inc. (NASDAQ: NITO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NITO stands at 2.9M. In comparison, MKD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NITO is priced at $3.06 on the NASDAQ, while MKD trades at $0.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NITO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.24, whereas MKD's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, NITO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to MKD's ROE of +2.68%. Regarding short-term risk, NITO is less volatile compared to MKD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NITO.Check MKD's competition here

Nexentis Technologies Inc. (NASDAQ: NITO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NITO stands at 2.9M. In comparison, OCIP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NITO is priced at $3.06 on the NASDAQ, while OCIP trades at $11.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NITO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.24, whereas OCIP's P/E ratio is 24.37. In terms of profitability, NITO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to OCIP's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NITO is more volatile compared to OCIP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NITO.Check OCIP's competition here