Nexentis Technologies Inc. (NASDAQ: NITO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

Nexentis Technologies Inc. (NASDAQ: NITO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NITO stands at 2.9M. In comparison, SHLM has a market cap of 26.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NITO is priced at $3.06 on the NASDAQ, while SHLM trades at $44.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NITO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.24, whereas SHLM's P/E ratio is 42.74. In terms of profitability, NITO's ROE is -0.94%, compared to SHLM's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NITO is more volatile compared to SHLM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NITO.Check SHLM's competition here

Nexentis Technologies Inc. (NASDAQ: NITO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NITO stands at 2.9M. In comparison, DOW has a market cap of 20.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NITO is priced at $3.06 on the NASDAQ, while DOW trades at $29.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NITO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.24, whereas DOW's P/E ratio is -26.49. In terms of profitability, NITO's ROE is -0.94%, compared to DOW's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NITO is more volatile compared to DOW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NITO.Check DOW's competition here

Nexentis Technologies Inc. (NASDAQ: NITO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NITO stands at 2.9M. In comparison, UNVR has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NITO is priced at $3.06 on the NASDAQ, while UNVR trades at $36.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NITO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.24, whereas UNVR's P/E ratio is 13.29. In terms of profitability, NITO's ROE is -0.94%, compared to UNVR's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, NITO is more volatile compared to UNVR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NITO.Check UNVR's competition here

Nexentis Technologies Inc. (NASDAQ: NITO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NITO stands at 2.9M. In comparison, MEOH has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NITO is priced at $3.06 on the NASDAQ, while MEOH trades at $52.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NITO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.24, whereas MEOH's P/E ratio is 44.71. In terms of profitability, NITO's ROE is -0.94%, compared to MEOH's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NITO is more volatile compared to MEOH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NITO.Check MEOH's competition here

Nexentis Technologies Inc. (NASDAQ: NITO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NITO stands at 2.9M. In comparison, HUN has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, NITO is priced at $3.06 on the NASDAQ, while HUN trades at $11.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NITO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.24, whereas HUN's P/E ratio is -14.30. In terms of profitability, NITO's ROE is -0.94%, compared to HUN's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NITO is more volatile compared to HUN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NITO.Check HUN's competition here

Nexentis Technologies Inc. (NASDAQ: NITO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NITO stands at 2.9M. In comparison, AACQU has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NITO is priced at $3.06 on the NASDAQ, while AACQU trades at $11.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NITO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.24, whereas AACQU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NITO's ROE is -0.94%, compared to AACQU's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NITO is more volatile compared to AACQU. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NITO.Check AACQU's competition here

Nexentis Technologies Inc. (NASDAQ: NITO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NITO stands at 2.9M. In comparison, TROX has a market cap of 981.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NITO is priced at $3.06 on the NASDAQ, while TROX trades at $5.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NITO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.24, whereas TROX's P/E ratio is -3.26. In terms of profitability, NITO's ROE is -0.94%, compared to TROX's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, NITO is more volatile compared to TROX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NITO.Check TROX's competition here

Nexentis Technologies Inc. (NASDAQ: NITO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NITO stands at 2.9M. In comparison, BAK has a market cap of 942.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NITO is priced at $3.06 on the NASDAQ, while BAK trades at $2.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NITO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.24, whereas BAK's P/E ratio is 47.30. In terms of profitability, NITO's ROE is -0.94%, compared to BAK's ROE of +0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, NITO is more volatile compared to BAK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NITO.Check BAK's competition here

Nexentis Technologies Inc. (NASDAQ: NITO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NITO stands at 2.9M. In comparison, LXU has a market cap of 822.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NITO is priced at $3.06 on the NASDAQ, while LXU trades at $11.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NITO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.24, whereas LXU's P/E ratio is 18.14. In terms of profitability, NITO's ROE is -0.94%, compared to LXU's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NITO is more volatile compared to LXU. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NITO.Check LXU's competition here

Nexentis Technologies Inc. (NASDAQ: NITO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NITO stands at 2.9M. In comparison, WLKP has a market cap of 774.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NITO is priced at $3.06 on the NASDAQ, while WLKP trades at $22.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NITO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.24, whereas WLKP's P/E ratio is 13.40. In terms of profitability, NITO's ROE is -0.94%, compared to WLKP's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, NITO is more volatile compared to WLKP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NITO.Check WLKP's competition here

Nexentis Technologies Inc. (NASDAQ: NITO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NITO stands at 2.9M. In comparison, RYAM has a market cap of 591.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NITO is priced at $3.06 on the NASDAQ, while RYAM trades at $8.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NITO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.24, whereas RYAM's P/E ratio is -4.38. In terms of profitability, NITO's ROE is -0.94%, compared to RYAM's ROE of -1.54%. Regarding short-term risk, NITO is more volatile compared to RYAM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NITO.Check RYAM's competition here

Nexentis Technologies Inc. (NASDAQ: NITO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NITO stands at 2.9M. In comparison, ASIX has a market cap of 550.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NITO is priced at $3.06 on the NASDAQ, while ASIX trades at $20.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NITO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.24, whereas ASIX's P/E ratio is 24.04. In terms of profitability, NITO's ROE is -0.94%, compared to ASIX's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NITO is more volatile compared to ASIX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NITO.Check ASIX's competition here

Nexentis Technologies Inc. (NASDAQ: NITO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NITO stands at 2.9M. In comparison, SIRE has a market cap of 501.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NITO is priced at $3.06 on the NASDAQ, while SIRE trades at $25.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NITO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.24, whereas SIRE's P/E ratio is 7.58. In terms of profitability, NITO's ROE is -0.94%, compared to SIRE's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, NITO is more volatile compared to SIRE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NITO.Check SIRE's competition here

Nexentis Technologies Inc. (NASDAQ: NITO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NITO stands at 2.9M. In comparison, CINR has a market cap of 402.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NITO is priced at $3.06 on the NASDAQ, while CINR trades at $20.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NITO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.24, whereas CINR's P/E ratio is 21.93. In terms of profitability, NITO's ROE is -0.94%, compared to CINR's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, NITO is more volatile compared to CINR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NITO.Check CINR's competition here

Nexentis Technologies Inc. (NASDAQ: NITO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NITO stands at 2.9M. In comparison, VHI has a market cap of 386M. Regarding current trading prices, NITO is priced at $3.06 on the NASDAQ, while VHI trades at $13.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NITO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.24, whereas VHI's P/E ratio is -6.53. In terms of profitability, NITO's ROE is -0.94%, compared to VHI's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NITO is more volatile compared to VHI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NITO.Check VHI's competition here

Nexentis Technologies Inc. (NASDAQ: NITO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NITO stands at 2.9M. In comparison, ASPI has a market cap of 313.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NITO is priced at $3.06 on the NASDAQ, while ASPI trades at $3.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NITO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.24, whereas ASPI's P/E ratio is -1.69. In terms of profitability, NITO's ROE is -0.94%, compared to ASPI's ROE of -1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NITO is more volatile compared to ASPI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NITO.Check ASPI's competition here

Nexentis Technologies Inc. (NASDAQ: NITO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NITO stands at 2.9M. In comparison, FMST has a market cap of 17.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NITO is priced at $3.06 on the NASDAQ, while FMST trades at $1.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NITO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.24, whereas FMST's P/E ratio is -4.11. In terms of profitability, NITO's ROE is -0.94%, compared to FMST's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NITO is more volatile compared to FMST. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NITO.Check FMST's competition here

Nexentis Technologies Inc. (NASDAQ: NITO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NITO stands at 2.9M. In comparison, SNES has a market cap of 7M. Regarding current trading prices, NITO is priced at $3.06 on the NASDAQ, while SNES trades at $1.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NITO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.24, whereas SNES's P/E ratio is -0.75. In terms of profitability, NITO's ROE is -0.94%, compared to SNES's ROE of -0.76%. Regarding short-term risk, NITO is more volatile compared to SNES. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NITO.Check SNES's competition here

Nexentis Technologies Inc. (NASDAQ: NITO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NITO stands at 2.9M. In comparison, FMSTW has a market cap of 4.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NITO is priced at $3.06 on the NASDAQ, while FMSTW trades at $0.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NITO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.24, whereas FMSTW's P/E ratio is -0.69. In terms of profitability, NITO's ROE is -0.94%, compared to FMSTW's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NITO is more volatile compared to FMSTW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NITO.Check FMSTW's competition here

Nexentis Technologies Inc. (NASDAQ: NITO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NITO stands at 2.9M. In comparison, ORGNW has a market cap of 14.7K. Regarding current trading prices, NITO is priced at $3.06 on the NASDAQ, while ORGNW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NITO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.24, whereas ORGNW's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, NITO's ROE is -0.94%, compared to ORGNW's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NITO is less volatile compared to ORGNW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NITO.Check ORGNW's competition here

Nexentis Technologies Inc. (NASDAQ: NITO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NITO stands at 2.9M. In comparison, MKD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NITO is priced at $3.06 on the NASDAQ, while MKD trades at $0.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NITO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.24, whereas MKD's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, NITO's ROE is -0.94%, compared to MKD's ROE of +2.68%. Regarding short-term risk, NITO is less volatile compared to MKD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NITO.Check MKD's competition here

Nexentis Technologies Inc. (NASDAQ: NITO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NITO stands at 2.9M. In comparison, OCIP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NITO is priced at $3.06 on the NASDAQ, while OCIP trades at $11.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NITO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.24, whereas OCIP's P/E ratio is 24.37. In terms of profitability, NITO's ROE is -0.94%, compared to OCIP's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NITO is more volatile compared to OCIP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NITO.Check OCIP's competition here