N2OFF, Inc.
N2OFF, Inc. (NITO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (NITO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Agricultural Inputs Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NITO | $4.72 | +0.75% | 4.7M | -0.38 | -$12.75 | N/A |
| CTA-PB | $68.14 | -0.03% | 59.3B | N/A | N/A | +0.85% |
| CTVA | $83.07 | +0.29% | 55.3B | 44.65 | $1.85 | +0.85% |
| CTA-PA | $53.00 | -2.09% | 35.9B | N/A | N/A | +6.60% |
| NTR | $71.52 | +0.32% | 34.6B | 14.66 | $4.91 | +3.04% |
| CF | $126.45 | +1.58% | 20B | 11.75 | $11.10 | +1.54% |
| ICL | $6.82 | +4.85% | 8.2B | 35.44 | $0.18 | +2.81% |
| MOS | $23.10 | +6.01% | 7.1B | 159.93 | $0.14 | +3.92% |
| SMG | $58.48 | -2.58% | 3.5B | 17.12 | $3.48 | +4.40% |
| FMC | $12.74 | -2.86% | 1.6B | -0.67 | -$19.62 | +9.95% |
Stock Comparison
NITO vs CTA-PB Comparison May 2026
NITO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NITO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, CTA-PB has a market cap of 59.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NITO is priced at $4.72, while CTA-PB trades at $68.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NITO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.38, whereas CTA-PB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NITO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to CTA-PB's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NITO is more volatile compared to CTA-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NITO.Check CTA-PB's competition here
NITO vs CTVA Comparison May 2026
NITO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NITO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, CTVA has a market cap of 55.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NITO is priced at $4.72, while CTVA trades at $83.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NITO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.38, whereas CTVA's P/E ratio is 44.65. In terms of profitability, NITO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to CTVA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NITO is more volatile compared to CTVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NITO.Check CTVA's competition here
NITO vs CTA-PA Comparison May 2026
NITO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NITO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, CTA-PA has a market cap of 35.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NITO is priced at $4.72, while CTA-PA trades at $53.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NITO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.38, whereas CTA-PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NITO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to CTA-PA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NITO is more volatile compared to CTA-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NITO.Check CTA-PA's competition here
NITO vs NTR Comparison May 2026
NITO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NITO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, NTR has a market cap of 34.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NITO is priced at $4.72, while NTR trades at $71.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NITO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.38, whereas NTR's P/E ratio is 14.66. In terms of profitability, NITO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to NTR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NITO is more volatile compared to NTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NITO.Check NTR's competition here
NITO vs CF Comparison May 2026
NITO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NITO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, CF has a market cap of 20B. Regarding current trading prices, NITO is priced at $4.72, while CF trades at $126.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NITO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.38, whereas CF's P/E ratio is 11.75. In terms of profitability, NITO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to CF's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, NITO is more volatile compared to CF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NITO.Check CF's competition here
NITO vs ICL Comparison May 2026
NITO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NITO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, ICL has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NITO is priced at $4.72, while ICL trades at $6.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NITO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.38, whereas ICL's P/E ratio is 35.44. In terms of profitability, NITO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to ICL's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NITO is more volatile compared to ICL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NITO.Check ICL's competition here
NITO vs MOS Comparison May 2026
NITO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NITO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, MOS has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NITO is priced at $4.72, while MOS trades at $23.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NITO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.38, whereas MOS's P/E ratio is 159.93. In terms of profitability, NITO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to MOS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NITO is more volatile compared to MOS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NITO.Check MOS's competition here
NITO vs SMG Comparison May 2026
NITO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NITO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, SMG has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NITO is priced at $4.72, while SMG trades at $58.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NITO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.38, whereas SMG's P/E ratio is 17.12. In terms of profitability, NITO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to SMG's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, NITO is more volatile compared to SMG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NITO.Check SMG's competition here
NITO vs FMC Comparison May 2026
NITO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NITO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, FMC has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NITO is priced at $4.72, while FMC trades at $12.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NITO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.38, whereas FMC's P/E ratio is -0.67. In terms of profitability, NITO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to FMC's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, NITO is more volatile compared to FMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NITO.Check FMC's competition here
NITO vs UAN Comparison May 2026
NITO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NITO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, UAN has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NITO is priced at $4.72, while UAN trades at $130.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NITO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.38, whereas UAN's P/E ratio is 11.55. In terms of profitability, NITO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to UAN's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, NITO is more volatile compared to UAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NITO.Check UAN's competition here
NITO vs PURR Comparison May 2026
NITO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NITO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, PURR has a market cap of 774.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NITO is priced at $4.72, while PURR trades at $6.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NITO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.38, whereas PURR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NITO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to PURR's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, NITO is more volatile compared to PURR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NITO.Check PURR's competition here
NITO vs IPI Comparison May 2026
NITO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NITO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, IPI has a market cap of 627.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NITO is priced at $4.72, while IPI trades at $44.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NITO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.38, whereas IPI's P/E ratio is 42.05. In terms of profitability, NITO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to IPI's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NITO is less volatile compared to IPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NITO.Check IPI's competition here
NITO vs AVD Comparison May 2026
NITO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NITO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, AVD has a market cap of 83.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NITO is priced at $4.72, while AVD trades at $2.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NITO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.38, whereas AVD's P/E ratio is -1.84. In terms of profitability, NITO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to AVD's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, NITO is more volatile compared to AVD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NITO.Check AVD's competition here
NITO vs BHST Comparison May 2026
NITO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NITO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, BHST has a market cap of 66.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NITO is priced at $4.72, while BHST trades at $3.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NITO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.38, whereas BHST's P/E ratio is -6.40. In terms of profitability, NITO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to BHST's ROE of -1.59%. Regarding short-term risk, NITO is more volatile compared to BHST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NITO.Check BHST's competition here
NITO vs MULG Comparison May 2026
NITO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NITO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, MULG has a market cap of 49.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NITO is priced at $4.72, while MULG trades at $2.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NITO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.38, whereas MULG's P/E ratio is 18.21. In terms of profitability, NITO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to MULG's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NITO is more volatile compared to MULG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NITO.Check MULG's competition here
NITO vs BHIL-WT Comparison May 2026
NITO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NITO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, BHIL-WT has a market cap of 49M. Regarding current trading prices, NITO is priced at $4.72, while BHIL-WT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NITO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.38, whereas BHIL-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NITO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to BHIL-WT's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, NITO is less volatile compared to BHIL-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NITO.Check BHIL-WT's competition here
NITO vs FNUC Comparison May 2026
NITO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NITO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, FNUC has a market cap of 31.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NITO is priced at $4.72, while FNUC trades at $2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NITO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.38, whereas FNUC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NITO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to FNUC's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NITO is less volatile compared to FNUC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NITO.Check FNUC's competition here
NITO vs CGA Comparison May 2026
NITO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NITO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, CGA has a market cap of 29.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NITO is priced at $4.72, while CGA trades at $1.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NITO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.38, whereas CGA's P/E ratio is -0.98. In terms of profitability, NITO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to CGA's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NITO is more volatile compared to CGA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NITO.Check CGA's competition here
NITO vs BIOX Comparison May 2026
NITO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NITO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, BIOX has a market cap of 28.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NITO is priced at $4.72, while BIOX trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NITO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.38, whereas BIOX's P/E ratio is -0.43. In terms of profitability, NITO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to BIOX's ROE of -1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NITO is less volatile compared to BIOX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NITO.Check BIOX's competition here
NITO vs LVRO Comparison May 2026
NITO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NITO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, LVRO has a market cap of 15.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NITO is priced at $4.72, while LVRO trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NITO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.38, whereas LVRO's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, NITO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to LVRO's ROE of -1.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NITO is more volatile compared to LVRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NITO.Check LVRO's competition here
NITO vs SEED Comparison May 2026
NITO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NITO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, SEED has a market cap of 8.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NITO is priced at $4.72, while SEED trades at $1.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NITO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.38, whereas SEED's P/E ratio is -1.07. In terms of profitability, NITO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to SEED's ROE of +1.86%. Regarding short-term risk, NITO is more volatile compared to SEED. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NITO.Check SEED's competition here
NITO vs AGRZ Comparison May 2026
NITO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NITO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, AGRZ has a market cap of 7.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NITO is priced at $4.72, while AGRZ trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NITO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.38, whereas AGRZ's P/E ratio is 3.70. In terms of profitability, NITO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to AGRZ's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, NITO is less volatile compared to AGRZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NITO.Check AGRZ's competition here
NITO vs SVFD Comparison May 2026
NITO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NITO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, SVFD has a market cap of 4.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NITO is priced at $4.72, while SVFD trades at $1.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NITO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.38, whereas SVFD's P/E ratio is 0.07. In terms of profitability, NITO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to SVFD's ROE of -462.29%. Regarding short-term risk, NITO is less volatile compared to SVFD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NITO.Check SVFD's competition here
NITO vs FMTO Comparison May 2026
NITO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NITO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, FMTO has a market cap of 3.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NITO is priced at $4.72, while FMTO trades at $3.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NITO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.38, whereas FMTO's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, NITO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to FMTO's ROE of +75.78%. Regarding short-term risk, NITO is less volatile compared to FMTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NITO.Check FMTO's competition here
NITO vs BHIL Comparison May 2026
NITO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NITO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, BHIL has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NITO is priced at $4.72, while BHIL trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NITO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.38, whereas BHIL's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, NITO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to BHIL's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, NITO is more volatile compared to BHIL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NITO.Check BHIL's competition here
NITO vs RKDA Comparison May 2026
NITO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NITO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, RKDA has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NITO is priced at $4.72, while RKDA trades at $1.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NITO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.38, whereas RKDA's P/E ratio is -0.62. In terms of profitability, NITO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to RKDA's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, NITO is less volatile compared to RKDA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NITO.Check RKDA's competition here
NITO vs YTEN Comparison May 2026
NITO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NITO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, YTEN has a market cap of 345.5K. Regarding current trading prices, NITO is priced at $4.72, while YTEN trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NITO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.38, whereas YTEN's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, NITO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to YTEN's ROE of -15.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NITO is less volatile compared to YTEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NITO.Check YTEN's competition here
NITO vs MBII Comparison May 2026
NITO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NITO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, MBII has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NITO is priced at $4.72, while MBII trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NITO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.38, whereas MBII's P/E ratio is -6.82. In terms of profitability, NITO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to MBII's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, NITO is less volatile compared to MBII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NITO.Check MBII's competition here
NITO vs TNH Comparison May 2026
NITO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NITO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, TNH has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NITO is priced at $4.72, while TNH trades at $83.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NITO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.38, whereas TNH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NITO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to TNH's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, NITO is more volatile compared to TNH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NITO.Check TNH's competition here