CF Industries Holdings, Inc.

CF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CF stands at 18.8B. In comparison, CTA-PB has a market cap of 59.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CF is priced at $122.46, while CTA-PB trades at $68.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.65, whereas CTA-PB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to CTA-PB's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CF is more volatile compared to CTA-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CF.Check CTA-PB's competition here

CF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CF stands at 18.8B. In comparison, CTVA has a market cap of 53.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CF is priced at $122.46, while CTVA trades at $79.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.65, whereas CTVA's P/E ratio is 45.33. In terms of profitability, CF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to CTVA's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CF is less volatile compared to CTVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CF.Check CTVA's competition here

CF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CF stands at 18.8B. In comparison, CTA-PA has a market cap of 36.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CF is priced at $122.46, while CTA-PA trades at $54.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.65, whereas CTA-PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to CTA-PA's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CF is more volatile compared to CTA-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CF.Check CTA-PA's competition here

CF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CF stands at 18.8B. In comparison, NTR has a market cap of 34.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CF is priced at $122.46, while NTR trades at $71.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.65, whereas NTR's P/E ratio is 15.35. In terms of profitability, CF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to NTR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CF is less volatile compared to NTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CF.Check NTR's competition here

CF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CF stands at 18.8B. In comparison, MOS has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CF is priced at $122.46, while MOS trades at $24.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.65, whereas MOS's P/E ratio is 14.42. In terms of profitability, CF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to MOS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CF is less volatile compared to MOS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CF.Check MOS's competition here

CF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CF stands at 18.8B. In comparison, ICL has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CF is priced at $122.46, while ICL trades at $5.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.65, whereas ICL's P/E ratio is 28.89. In terms of profitability, CF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to ICL's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CF is more volatile compared to ICL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CF.Check ICL's competition here

CF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CF stands at 18.8B. In comparison, SMG has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CF is priced at $122.46, while SMG trades at $63.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.65, whereas SMG's P/E ratio is 22.86. In terms of profitability, CF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to SMG's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CF is less volatile compared to SMG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CF.Check SMG's competition here

CF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CF stands at 18.8B. In comparison, FMC has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CF is priced at $122.46, while FMC trades at $14.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.65, whereas FMC's P/E ratio is -0.84. In terms of profitability, CF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to FMC's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, CF is less volatile compared to FMC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CF.Check FMC's competition here

CF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CF stands at 18.8B. In comparison, UAN has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CF is priced at $122.46, while UAN trades at $127.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.65, whereas UAN's P/E ratio is 13.63. In terms of profitability, CF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to UAN's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CF is less volatile compared to UAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CF.Check UAN's competition here

CF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CF stands at 18.8B. In comparison, PURR has a market cap of 761.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CF is priced at $122.46, while PURR trades at $6.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.65, whereas PURR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to PURR's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, CF is less volatile compared to PURR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CF.Check PURR's competition here

CF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CF stands at 18.8B. In comparison, IPI has a market cap of 506.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CF is priced at $122.46, while IPI trades at $37.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.65, whereas IPI's P/E ratio is 44.44. In terms of profitability, CF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to IPI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CF is more volatile compared to IPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CF.Check IPI's competition here

CF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CF stands at 18.8B. In comparison, AVD has a market cap of 79.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CF is priced at $122.46, while AVD trades at $2.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.65, whereas AVD's P/E ratio is -1.59. In terms of profitability, CF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to AVD's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CF is less volatile compared to AVD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CF.Check AVD's competition here

CF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CF stands at 18.8B. In comparison, BHST has a market cap of 77.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CF is priced at $122.46, while BHST trades at $4.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.65, whereas BHST's P/E ratio is -7.18. In terms of profitability, CF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to BHST's ROE of -1.59%. Regarding short-term risk, CF is more volatile compared to BHST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CF.Check BHST's competition here

CF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CF stands at 18.8B. In comparison, MULG has a market cap of 49.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CF is priced at $122.46, while MULG trades at $2.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.65, whereas MULG's P/E ratio is 18.21. In terms of profitability, CF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to MULG's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CF is more volatile compared to MULG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CF.Check MULG's competition here

CF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CF stands at 18.8B. In comparison, BHIL-WT has a market cap of 49M. Regarding current trading prices, CF is priced at $122.46, while BHIL-WT trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.65, whereas BHIL-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to BHIL-WT's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, CF is less volatile compared to BHIL-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CF.Check BHIL-WT's competition here

CF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CF stands at 18.8B. In comparison, FNUC has a market cap of 40.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CF is priced at $122.46, while FNUC trades at $2.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.65, whereas FNUC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to FNUC's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CF is less volatile compared to FNUC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CF.Check FNUC's competition here

CF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CF stands at 18.8B. In comparison, BIOX has a market cap of 40.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CF is priced at $122.46, while BIOX trades at $0.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.65, whereas BIOX's P/E ratio is -0.60. In terms of profitability, CF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to BIOX's ROE of -1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CF is less volatile compared to BIOX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CF.Check BIOX's competition here

CF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CF stands at 18.8B. In comparison, CGA has a market cap of 29.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CF is priced at $122.46, while CGA trades at $1.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.65, whereas CGA's P/E ratio is -0.98. In terms of profitability, CF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to CGA's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CF is more volatile compared to CGA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CF.Check CGA's competition here

CF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CF stands at 18.8B. In comparison, LVRO has a market cap of 15.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CF is priced at $122.46, while LVRO trades at $0.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.65, whereas LVRO's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, CF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to LVRO's ROE of -1.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CF is more volatile compared to LVRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CF.Check LVRO's competition here

CF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CF stands at 18.8B. In comparison, SEED has a market cap of 10.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CF is priced at $122.46, while SEED trades at $1.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.65, whereas SEED's P/E ratio is -1.34. In terms of profitability, CF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to SEED's ROE of +1.86%. Regarding short-term risk, CF is less volatile compared to SEED. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CF.Check SEED's competition here

CF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CF stands at 18.8B. In comparison, AGRZ has a market cap of 8.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CF is priced at $122.46, while AGRZ trades at $0.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.65, whereas AGRZ's P/E ratio is 4.44. In terms of profitability, CF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to AGRZ's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, CF is less volatile compared to AGRZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CF.Check AGRZ's competition here

CF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CF stands at 18.8B. In comparison, NITO has a market cap of 4.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CF is priced at $122.46, while NITO trades at $4.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.65, whereas NITO's P/E ratio is -0.36. In terms of profitability, CF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to NITO's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, CF is less volatile compared to NITO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CF.Check NITO's competition here

CF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CF stands at 18.8B. In comparison, SVFD has a market cap of 4.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CF is priced at $122.46, while SVFD trades at $1.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.65, whereas SVFD's P/E ratio is 0.07. In terms of profitability, CF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to SVFD's ROE of -462.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CF is less volatile compared to SVFD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CF.Check SVFD's competition here

CF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CF stands at 18.8B. In comparison, FMTO has a market cap of 3.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CF is priced at $122.46, while FMTO trades at $3.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.65, whereas FMTO's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, CF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to FMTO's ROE of +75.78%. Regarding short-term risk, CF is less volatile compared to FMTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CF.Check FMTO's competition here

CF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CF stands at 18.8B. In comparison, BHIL has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CF is priced at $122.46, while BHIL trades at $0.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.65, whereas BHIL's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to BHIL's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, CF is more volatile compared to BHIL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CF.Check BHIL's competition here

CF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CF stands at 18.8B. In comparison, RKDA has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CF is priced at $122.46, while RKDA trades at $1.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.65, whereas RKDA's P/E ratio is -0.64. In terms of profitability, CF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to RKDA's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, CF is less volatile compared to RKDA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CF.Check RKDA's competition here

CF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CF stands at 18.8B. In comparison, YTEN has a market cap of 345.5K. Regarding current trading prices, CF is priced at $122.46, while YTEN trades at $0.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.65, whereas YTEN's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, CF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to YTEN's ROE of -15.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CF is less volatile compared to YTEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CF.Check YTEN's competition here

CF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CF stands at 18.8B. In comparison, TNH has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CF is priced at $122.46, while TNH trades at $83.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.65, whereas TNH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to TNH's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, CF is more volatile compared to TNH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CF.Check TNH's competition here

CF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CF stands at 18.8B. In comparison, MBII has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CF is priced at $122.46, while MBII trades at $0.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.65, whereas MBII's P/E ratio is -6.82. In terms of profitability, CF's ROE is +0.30%, compared to MBII's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, CF is less volatile compared to MBII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CF.Check MBII's competition here