Terra Nitrogen Co., L.P. (TNH) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (TNH) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Agricultural Inputs Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TNH | $83.96 | +0.00% | 0 | 10.13 | $8.29 | +7.10% |
| CTVA | $85.80 | +2.71% | 57.4B | 23.25 | $3.69 | +0.84% |
| CTA-PA | $52.95 | -0.97% | 55.3B | N/A | N/A | +0.84% |
| CTA-PB | $66.03 | -1.78% | 54.6B | N/A | N/A | +0.84% |
| NTR | $65.06 | +2.34% | 31.2B | 13.12 | $4.96 | +3.37% |
| CF | $110.54 | +2.20% | 17B | 10.59 | $10.44 | +1.81% |
| MOS | $21.13 | -0.80% | 6.7B | 11.61 | $1.82 | +4.16% |
| ICL | $5.03 | +0.00% | 6.5B | 12.90 | $0.39 | +3.79% |
| SMG | $68.85 | +0.41% | 4B | 15.68 | $4.39 | +3.83% |
| FMC | $11.35 | +3.65% | 1.4B | 4.45 | $2.55 | +7.22% |
Stock Comparison
TNH vs CTVA Comparison July 2026
TNH plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNH stands at 0. In comparison, CTVA has a market cap of 57.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TNH is priced at $83.96, while CTVA trades at $85.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNH currently has a P/E ratio of 10.13, whereas CTVA's P/E ratio is 23.25. In terms of profitability, TNH's ROE is +0.43%, compared to CTVA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TNH is less volatile compared to CTVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNH.Check CTVA's competition here
TNH vs CTA-PA Comparison July 2026
TNH plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNH stands at 0. In comparison, CTA-PA has a market cap of 55.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TNH is priced at $83.96, while CTA-PA trades at $52.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNH currently has a P/E ratio of 10.13, whereas CTA-PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TNH's ROE is +0.43%, compared to CTA-PA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TNH is less volatile compared to CTA-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNH.Check CTA-PA's competition here
TNH vs CTA-PB Comparison July 2026
TNH plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNH stands at 0. In comparison, CTA-PB has a market cap of 54.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TNH is priced at $83.96, while CTA-PB trades at $66.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNH currently has a P/E ratio of 10.13, whereas CTA-PB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TNH's ROE is +0.43%, compared to CTA-PB's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TNH is less volatile compared to CTA-PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNH.Check CTA-PB's competition here
TNH vs NTR Comparison July 2026
TNH plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNH stands at 0. In comparison, NTR has a market cap of 31.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TNH is priced at $83.96, while NTR trades at $65.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNH currently has a P/E ratio of 10.13, whereas NTR's P/E ratio is 13.12. In terms of profitability, TNH's ROE is +0.43%, compared to NTR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TNH is less volatile compared to NTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNH.Check NTR's competition here
TNH vs CF Comparison July 2026
TNH plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNH stands at 0. In comparison, CF has a market cap of 17B. Regarding current trading prices, TNH is priced at $83.96, while CF trades at $110.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNH currently has a P/E ratio of 10.13, whereas CF's P/E ratio is 10.59. In terms of profitability, TNH's ROE is +0.43%, compared to CF's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, TNH is less volatile compared to CF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNH.Check CF's competition here
TNH vs MOS Comparison July 2026
TNH plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNH stands at 0. In comparison, MOS has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TNH is priced at $83.96, while MOS trades at $21.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNH currently has a P/E ratio of 10.13, whereas MOS's P/E ratio is 11.61. In terms of profitability, TNH's ROE is +0.43%, compared to MOS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TNH is less volatile compared to MOS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNH.Check MOS's competition here
TNH vs ICL Comparison July 2026
TNH plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNH stands at 0. In comparison, ICL has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TNH is priced at $83.96, while ICL trades at $5.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNH currently has a P/E ratio of 10.13, whereas ICL's P/E ratio is 12.90. In terms of profitability, TNH's ROE is +0.43%, compared to ICL's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TNH is less volatile compared to ICL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNH.Check ICL's competition here
TNH vs SMG Comparison July 2026
TNH plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNH stands at 0. In comparison, SMG has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, TNH is priced at $83.96, while SMG trades at $68.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNH currently has a P/E ratio of 10.13, whereas SMG's P/E ratio is 15.68. In terms of profitability, TNH's ROE is +0.43%, compared to SMG's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, TNH is less volatile compared to SMG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNH.Check SMG's competition here
TNH vs FMC Comparison July 2026
TNH plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNH stands at 0. In comparison, FMC has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TNH is priced at $83.96, while FMC trades at $11.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNH currently has a P/E ratio of 10.13, whereas FMC's P/E ratio is 4.45. In terms of profitability, TNH's ROE is +0.43%, compared to FMC's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, TNH is less volatile compared to FMC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNH.Check FMC's competition here
TNH vs UAN Comparison July 2026
TNH plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNH stands at 0. In comparison, UAN has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TNH is priced at $83.96, while UAN trades at $114.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNH currently has a P/E ratio of 10.13, whereas UAN's P/E ratio is 9.91. In terms of profitability, TNH's ROE is +0.43%, compared to UAN's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, TNH is less volatile compared to UAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNH.Check UAN's competition here
TNH vs IPI Comparison July 2026
TNH plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNH stands at 0. In comparison, IPI has a market cap of 451.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TNH is priced at $83.96, while IPI trades at $33.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNH currently has a P/E ratio of 10.13, whereas IPI's P/E ratio is 20.11. In terms of profitability, TNH's ROE is +0.43%, compared to IPI's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TNH is less volatile compared to IPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNH.Check IPI's competition here
TNH vs AFRIW Comparison July 2026
TNH plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNH stands at 0. In comparison, AFRIW has a market cap of 302.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TNH is priced at $83.96, while AFRIW trades at $0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNH currently has a P/E ratio of 10.13, whereas AFRIW's P/E ratio is -30.46. In terms of profitability, TNH's ROE is +0.43%, compared to AFRIW's ROE of +2.87%. Regarding short-term risk, TNH is less volatile compared to AFRIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNH.Check AFRIW's competition here
TNH vs AVD Comparison July 2026
TNH plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNH stands at 0. In comparison, AVD has a market cap of 90.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TNH is priced at $83.96, while AVD trades at $3.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNH currently has a P/E ratio of 10.13, whereas AVD's P/E ratio is -10.90. In terms of profitability, TNH's ROE is +0.43%, compared to AVD's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TNH is less volatile compared to AVD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNH.Check AVD's competition here
TNH vs BHST Comparison July 2026
TNH plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNH stands at 0. In comparison, BHST has a market cap of 49.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TNH is priced at $83.96, while BHST trades at $2.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNH currently has a P/E ratio of 10.13, whereas BHST's P/E ratio is -5.74. In terms of profitability, TNH's ROE is +0.43%, compared to BHST's ROE of -0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, TNH is less volatile compared to BHST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNH.Check BHST's competition here
TNH vs BHIL-WT Comparison July 2026
TNH plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNH stands at 0. In comparison, BHIL-WT has a market cap of 49M. Regarding current trading prices, TNH is priced at $83.96, while BHIL-WT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNH currently has a P/E ratio of 10.13, whereas BHIL-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TNH's ROE is +0.43%, compared to BHIL-WT's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, TNH is less volatile compared to BHIL-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNH.Check BHIL-WT's competition here
TNH vs CGA Comparison July 2026
TNH plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNH stands at 0. In comparison, CGA has a market cap of 29.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TNH is priced at $83.96, while CGA trades at $1.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNH currently has a P/E ratio of 10.13, whereas CGA's P/E ratio is -0.98. In terms of profitability, TNH's ROE is +0.43%, compared to CGA's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TNH is more volatile compared to CGA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNH.Check CGA's competition here
TNH vs BIOX Comparison July 2026
TNH plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNH stands at 0. In comparison, BIOX has a market cap of 20.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TNH is priced at $83.96, while BIOX trades at $0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNH currently has a P/E ratio of 10.13, whereas BIOX's P/E ratio is -0.87. In terms of profitability, TNH's ROE is +0.43%, compared to BIOX's ROE of -1.51%. Regarding short-term risk, TNH is less volatile compared to BIOX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNH.Check BIOX's competition here
TNH vs LVRO Comparison July 2026
TNH plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNH stands at 0. In comparison, LVRO has a market cap of 15.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TNH is priced at $83.96, while LVRO trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNH currently has a P/E ratio of 10.13, whereas LVRO's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, TNH's ROE is +0.43%, compared to LVRO's ROE of +11.90%. Regarding short-term risk, TNH is more volatile compared to LVRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNH.Check LVRO's competition here
TNH vs SEED Comparison July 2026
TNH plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNH stands at 0. In comparison, SEED has a market cap of 7.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TNH is priced at $83.96, while SEED trades at $1.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNH currently has a P/E ratio of 10.13, whereas SEED's P/E ratio is -1.02. In terms of profitability, TNH's ROE is +0.43%, compared to SEED's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TNH is less volatile compared to SEED. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNH.Check SEED's competition here
TNH vs SVFD Comparison July 2026
TNH plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNH stands at 0. In comparison, SVFD has a market cap of 4.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TNH is priced at $83.96, while SVFD trades at $1.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNH currently has a P/E ratio of 10.13, whereas SVFD's P/E ratio is 0.07. In terms of profitability, TNH's ROE is +0.43%, compared to SVFD's ROE of -367.30%. Regarding short-term risk, TNH is less volatile compared to SVFD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNH.Check SVFD's competition here
TNH vs FMTO Comparison July 2026
TNH plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNH stands at 0. In comparison, FMTO has a market cap of 3.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TNH is priced at $83.96, while FMTO trades at $3.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNH currently has a P/E ratio of 10.13, whereas FMTO's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, TNH's ROE is +0.43%, compared to FMTO's ROE of -2.43%. Regarding short-term risk, TNH is less volatile compared to FMTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNH.Check FMTO's competition here
TNH vs BHIL Comparison July 2026
TNH plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNH stands at 0. In comparison, BHIL has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TNH is priced at $83.96, while BHIL trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNH currently has a P/E ratio of 10.13, whereas BHIL's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, TNH's ROE is +0.43%, compared to BHIL's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, TNH is more volatile compared to BHIL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNH.Check BHIL's competition here
TNH vs RKDA Comparison July 2026
TNH plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNH stands at 0. In comparison, RKDA has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TNH is priced at $83.96, while RKDA trades at $0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNH currently has a P/E ratio of 10.13, whereas RKDA's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, TNH's ROE is +0.43%, compared to RKDA's ROE of -2.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TNH is less volatile compared to RKDA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNH.Check RKDA's competition here
TNH vs YTEN Comparison July 2026
TNH plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNH stands at 0. In comparison, YTEN has a market cap of 345.5K. Regarding current trading prices, TNH is priced at $83.96, while YTEN trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNH currently has a P/E ratio of 10.13, whereas YTEN's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, TNH's ROE is +0.43%, compared to YTEN's ROE of -15.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TNH is less volatile compared to YTEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNH.Check YTEN's competition here
TNH vs NXTS Comparison July 2026
TNH plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNH stands at 0. In comparison, NXTS has a market cap of 243.4K. Regarding current trading prices, TNH is priced at $83.96, while NXTS trades at $4.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNH currently has a P/E ratio of 10.13, whereas NXTS's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, TNH's ROE is +0.43%, compared to NXTS's ROE of -0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, TNH is less volatile compared to NXTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNH.Check NXTS's competition here
TNH vs MBII Comparison July 2026
TNH plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNH stands at 0. In comparison, MBII has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TNH is priced at $83.96, while MBII trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNH currently has a P/E ratio of 10.13, whereas MBII's P/E ratio is -6.82. In terms of profitability, TNH's ROE is +0.43%, compared to MBII's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, TNH is less volatile compared to MBII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNH.Check MBII's competition here