Lavoro Limited (NASDAQ: LVRO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

Lavoro Limited (NASDAQ: LVRO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LVRO stands at 15.1M. In comparison, CTVA has a market cap of 53.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LVRO is priced at $0.13 on the NASDAQ, while CTVA trades at $80.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LVRO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas CTVA's P/E ratio is 21.53. In terms of profitability, LVRO's ROE is +11.90%, compared to CTVA's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LVRO is less volatile compared to CTVA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVRO.Check CTVA's competition here

Lavoro Limited (NASDAQ: LVRO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LVRO stands at 15.1M. In comparison, CTA-PA has a market cap of 51.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LVRO is priced at $0.13 on the NASDAQ, while CTA-PA trades at $52.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LVRO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas CTA-PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LVRO's ROE is +11.90%, compared to CTA-PA's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LVRO is similarly volatile compared to CTA-PA. This indicates similar risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVRO.Check CTA-PA's competition here

Lavoro Limited (NASDAQ: LVRO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LVRO stands at 15.1M. In comparison, CTA-PB has a market cap of 50.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LVRO is priced at $0.13 on the NASDAQ, while CTA-PB trades at $66.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LVRO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas CTA-PB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LVRO's ROE is +11.90%, compared to CTA-PB's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LVRO is less volatile compared to CTA-PB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVRO.Check CTA-PB's competition here

Lavoro Limited (NASDAQ: LVRO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LVRO stands at 15.1M. In comparison, NTR has a market cap of 35.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LVRO is priced at $0.13 on the NASDAQ, while NTR trades at $74.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LVRO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas NTR's P/E ratio is 14.86. In terms of profitability, LVRO's ROE is +11.90%, compared to NTR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LVRO is less volatile compared to NTR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVRO.Check NTR's competition here

Lavoro Limited (NASDAQ: LVRO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LVRO stands at 15.1M. In comparison, CF has a market cap of 19.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LVRO is priced at $0.13 on the NASDAQ, while CF trades at $129.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LVRO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas CF's P/E ratio is 9.04. In terms of profitability, LVRO's ROE is +11.90%, compared to CF's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, LVRO is less volatile compared to CF. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVRO.Check CF's competition here

Lavoro Limited (NASDAQ: LVRO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LVRO stands at 15.1M. In comparison, MOS has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LVRO is priced at $0.13 on the NASDAQ, while MOS trades at $24.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LVRO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas MOS's P/E ratio is 16.22. In terms of profitability, LVRO's ROE is +11.90%, compared to MOS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LVRO is less volatile compared to MOS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVRO.Check MOS's competition here

Lavoro Limited (NASDAQ: LVRO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LVRO stands at 15.1M. In comparison, ICL has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LVRO is priced at $0.13 on the NASDAQ, while ICL trades at $5.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LVRO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas ICL's P/E ratio is 13.13. In terms of profitability, LVRO's ROE is +11.90%, compared to ICL's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LVRO is less volatile compared to ICL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVRO.Check ICL's competition here

Lavoro Limited (NASDAQ: LVRO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LVRO stands at 15.1M. In comparison, SMG has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LVRO is priced at $0.13 on the NASDAQ, while SMG trades at $61.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LVRO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas SMG's P/E ratio is 13.92. In terms of profitability, LVRO's ROE is +11.90%, compared to SMG's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LVRO is less volatile compared to SMG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVRO.Check SMG's competition here

Lavoro Limited (NASDAQ: LVRO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LVRO stands at 15.1M. In comparison, FMC has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LVRO is priced at $0.13 on the NASDAQ, while FMC trades at $11.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LVRO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas FMC's P/E ratio is 4.27. In terms of profitability, LVRO's ROE is +11.90%, compared to FMC's ROE of -1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LVRO is less volatile compared to FMC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVRO.Check FMC's competition here

Lavoro Limited (NASDAQ: LVRO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LVRO stands at 15.1M. In comparison, UAN has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LVRO is priced at $0.13 on the NASDAQ, while UAN trades at $124.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LVRO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas UAN's P/E ratio is 10.82. In terms of profitability, LVRO's ROE is +11.90%, compared to UAN's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, LVRO is less volatile compared to UAN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVRO.Check UAN's competition here

Lavoro Limited (NASDAQ: LVRO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LVRO stands at 15.1M. In comparison, GLAS has a market cap of 737.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LVRO is priced at $0.13 on the NASDAQ, while GLAS trades at $9.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LVRO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas GLAS's P/E ratio is -17.01. In terms of profitability, LVRO's ROE is +11.90%, compared to GLAS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LVRO is less volatile compared to GLAS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVRO.Check GLAS's competition here

Lavoro Limited (NASDAQ: LVRO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LVRO stands at 15.1M. In comparison, IPI has a market cap of 513M. Regarding current trading prices, LVRO is priced at $0.13 on the NASDAQ, while IPI trades at $38.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LVRO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas IPI's P/E ratio is 21.46. In terms of profitability, LVRO's ROE is +11.90%, compared to IPI's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LVRO is less volatile compared to IPI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVRO.Check IPI's competition here

Lavoro Limited (NASDAQ: LVRO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LVRO stands at 15.1M. In comparison, AFRIW has a market cap of 367.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LVRO is priced at $0.13 on the NASDAQ, while AFRIW trades at $1.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LVRO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas AFRIW's P/E ratio is -46.52. In terms of profitability, LVRO's ROE is +11.90%, compared to AFRIW's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, LVRO is less volatile compared to AFRIW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVRO.Check AFRIW's competition here

Lavoro Limited (NASDAQ: LVRO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LVRO stands at 15.1M. In comparison, AVD has a market cap of 63.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LVRO is priced at $0.13 on the NASDAQ, while AVD trades at $2.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LVRO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas AVD's P/E ratio is -7.69. In terms of profitability, LVRO's ROE is +11.90%, compared to AVD's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, LVRO is less volatile compared to AVD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVRO.Check AVD's competition here

Lavoro Limited (NASDAQ: LVRO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LVRO stands at 15.1M. In comparison, BHIL-WT has a market cap of 49M. Regarding current trading prices, LVRO is priced at $0.13 on the NASDAQ, while BHIL-WT trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LVRO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas BHIL-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LVRO's ROE is +11.90%, compared to BHIL-WT's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, LVRO is less volatile compared to BHIL-WT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVRO.Check BHIL-WT's competition here

Lavoro Limited (NASDAQ: LVRO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LVRO stands at 15.1M. In comparison, BHST has a market cap of 35.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LVRO is priced at $0.13 on the NASDAQ, while BHST trades at $2.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LVRO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas BHST's P/E ratio is -4.08. In terms of profitability, LVRO's ROE is +11.90%, compared to BHST's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, LVRO is less volatile compared to BHST. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVRO.Check BHST's competition here

Lavoro Limited (NASDAQ: LVRO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LVRO stands at 15.1M. In comparison, CGA has a market cap of 29.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LVRO is priced at $0.13 on the NASDAQ, while CGA trades at $1.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LVRO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas CGA's P/E ratio is -0.98. In terms of profitability, LVRO's ROE is +11.90%, compared to CGA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LVRO is similarly volatile compared to CGA. This indicates similar risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVRO.Check CGA's competition here

Lavoro Limited (NASDAQ: LVRO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LVRO stands at 15.1M. In comparison, BIOX has a market cap of 28.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LVRO is priced at $0.13 on the NASDAQ, while BIOX trades at $0.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LVRO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas BIOX's P/E ratio is -0.42. In terms of profitability, LVRO's ROE is +11.90%, compared to BIOX's ROE of -1.54%. Regarding short-term risk, LVRO is less volatile compared to BIOX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVRO.Check BIOX's competition here

Lavoro Limited (NASDAQ: LVRO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LVRO stands at 15.1M. In comparison, SEED has a market cap of 12.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LVRO is priced at $0.13 on the NASDAQ, while SEED trades at $1.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LVRO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas SEED's P/E ratio is -1.01. In terms of profitability, LVRO's ROE is +11.90%, compared to SEED's ROE of +0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, LVRO is less volatile compared to SEED. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVRO.Check SEED's competition here

Lavoro Limited (NASDAQ: LVRO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LVRO stands at 15.1M. In comparison, SVFD has a market cap of 4.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LVRO is priced at $0.13 on the NASDAQ, while SVFD trades at $1.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LVRO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas SVFD's P/E ratio is 0.07. In terms of profitability, LVRO's ROE is +11.90%, compared to SVFD's ROE of -319.77%. Regarding short-term risk, LVRO is less volatile compared to SVFD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVRO.Check SVFD's competition here

Lavoro Limited (NASDAQ: LVRO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LVRO stands at 15.1M. In comparison, FMTO has a market cap of 3.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LVRO is priced at $0.13 on the NASDAQ, while FMTO trades at $3.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LVRO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas FMTO's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, LVRO's ROE is +11.90%, compared to FMTO's ROE of -2.43%. Regarding short-term risk, LVRO is less volatile compared to FMTO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVRO.Check FMTO's competition here

Lavoro Limited (NASDAQ: LVRO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LVRO stands at 15.1M. In comparison, BHIL has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LVRO is priced at $0.13 on the NASDAQ, while BHIL trades at $0.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LVRO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas BHIL's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, LVRO's ROE is +11.90%, compared to BHIL's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, LVRO is similarly volatile compared to BHIL. This indicates similar risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVRO.Check BHIL's competition here

Lavoro Limited (NASDAQ: LVRO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LVRO stands at 15.1M. In comparison, RKDA has a market cap of 715.2K. Regarding current trading prices, LVRO is priced at $0.13 on the NASDAQ, while RKDA trades at $0.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LVRO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas RKDA's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, LVRO's ROE is +11.90%, compared to RKDA's ROE of -3.40%. Regarding short-term risk, LVRO is less volatile compared to RKDA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVRO.Check RKDA's competition here

Lavoro Limited (NASDAQ: LVRO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LVRO stands at 15.1M. In comparison, YTEN has a market cap of 345.5K. Regarding current trading prices, LVRO is priced at $0.13 on the NASDAQ, while YTEN trades at $0.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LVRO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas YTEN's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, LVRO's ROE is +11.90%, compared to YTEN's ROE of -15.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LVRO is less volatile compared to YTEN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVRO.Check YTEN's competition here

Lavoro Limited (NASDAQ: LVRO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LVRO stands at 15.1M. In comparison, NXTS has a market cap of 101.9K. Regarding current trading prices, LVRO is priced at $0.13 on the NASDAQ, while NXTS trades at $1.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LVRO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas NXTS's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, LVRO's ROE is +11.90%, compared to NXTS's ROE of -1.61%. Regarding short-term risk, LVRO is less volatile compared to NXTS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVRO.Check NXTS's competition here

Lavoro Limited (NASDAQ: LVRO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LVRO stands at 15.1M. In comparison, TNH has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LVRO is priced at $0.13 on the NASDAQ, while TNH trades at $83.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LVRO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas TNH's P/E ratio is 10.13. In terms of profitability, LVRO's ROE is +11.90%, compared to TNH's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, LVRO is less volatile compared to TNH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVRO.Check TNH's competition here

Lavoro Limited (NASDAQ: LVRO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LVRO stands at 15.1M. In comparison, MBII has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LVRO is priced at $0.13 on the NASDAQ, while MBII trades at $0.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LVRO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas MBII's P/E ratio is -6.82. In terms of profitability, LVRO's ROE is +11.90%, compared to MBII's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, LVRO is less volatile compared to MBII. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVRO.Check MBII's competition here