CVR Partners, LP
CVR Partners, LP (UAN) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (UAN) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Agricultural Inputs Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UAN | $132.19 | +4.72% | 1.4B | 11.47 | $11.49 | +9.45% |
| CTA-PB | $68.16 | -0.10% | 59.1B | N/A | N/A | +0.86% |
| CTVA | $82.83 | +2.10% | 55.4B | 44.78 | $1.85 | +0.86% |
| CTA-PA | $54.13 | -0.22% | 36.3B | N/A | N/A | +6.48% |
| NTR | $71.29 | +4.33% | 34.3B | 14.52 | $4.91 | +3.07% |
| CF | $124.48 | +8.22% | 19.1B | 11.21 | $11.10 | +1.61% |
| ICL | $6.50 | +2.04% | 8.4B | 36.08 | $0.18 | +2.76% |
| MOS | $21.79 | -1.80% | 6.9B | 12.82 | $1.70 | +4.06% |
| SMG | $60.03 | -1.72% | 3.5B | 17.25 | $3.48 | +4.42% |
| FMC | $13.11 | -2.16% | 1.6B | -0.67 | -$19.62 | +10.10% |
Stock Comparison
UAN vs CTA-PB Comparison May 2026
UAN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAN stands at 1.4B. In comparison, CTA-PB has a market cap of 59.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UAN is priced at $132.19, while CTA-PB trades at $68.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.47, whereas CTA-PB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UAN's ROE is +0.40%, compared to CTA-PB's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UAN is more volatile compared to CTA-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAN.Check CTA-PB's competition here
UAN vs CTVA Comparison May 2026
UAN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAN stands at 1.4B. In comparison, CTVA has a market cap of 55.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UAN is priced at $132.19, while CTVA trades at $82.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.47, whereas CTVA's P/E ratio is 44.78. In terms of profitability, UAN's ROE is +0.40%, compared to CTVA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UAN is more volatile compared to CTVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAN.Check CTVA's competition here
UAN vs CTA-PA Comparison May 2026
UAN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAN stands at 1.4B. In comparison, CTA-PA has a market cap of 36.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UAN is priced at $132.19, while CTA-PA trades at $54.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.47, whereas CTA-PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UAN's ROE is +0.40%, compared to CTA-PA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UAN is more volatile compared to CTA-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAN.Check CTA-PA's competition here
UAN vs NTR Comparison May 2026
UAN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAN stands at 1.4B. In comparison, NTR has a market cap of 34.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UAN is priced at $132.19, while NTR trades at $71.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.47, whereas NTR's P/E ratio is 14.52. In terms of profitability, UAN's ROE is +0.40%, compared to NTR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UAN is more volatile compared to NTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAN.Check NTR's competition here
UAN vs CF Comparison May 2026
UAN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAN stands at 1.4B. In comparison, CF has a market cap of 19.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UAN is priced at $132.19, while CF trades at $124.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.47, whereas CF's P/E ratio is 11.21. In terms of profitability, UAN's ROE is +0.40%, compared to CF's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, UAN is more volatile compared to CF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAN.Check CF's competition here
UAN vs ICL Comparison May 2026
UAN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAN stands at 1.4B. In comparison, ICL has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UAN is priced at $132.19, while ICL trades at $6.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.47, whereas ICL's P/E ratio is 36.08. In terms of profitability, UAN's ROE is +0.40%, compared to ICL's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UAN is more volatile compared to ICL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAN.Check ICL's competition here
UAN vs MOS Comparison May 2026
UAN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAN stands at 1.4B. In comparison, MOS has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UAN is priced at $132.19, while MOS trades at $21.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.47, whereas MOS's P/E ratio is 12.82. In terms of profitability, UAN's ROE is +0.40%, compared to MOS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UAN is more volatile compared to MOS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAN.Check MOS's competition here
UAN vs SMG Comparison May 2026
UAN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAN stands at 1.4B. In comparison, SMG has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UAN is priced at $132.19, while SMG trades at $60.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.47, whereas SMG's P/E ratio is 17.25. In terms of profitability, UAN's ROE is +0.40%, compared to SMG's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, UAN is more volatile compared to SMG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAN.Check SMG's competition here
UAN vs FMC Comparison May 2026
UAN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAN stands at 1.4B. In comparison, FMC has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UAN is priced at $132.19, while FMC trades at $13.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.47, whereas FMC's P/E ratio is -0.67. In terms of profitability, UAN's ROE is +0.40%, compared to FMC's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, UAN is more volatile compared to FMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAN.Check FMC's competition here
UAN vs PURR Comparison May 2026
UAN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAN stands at 1.4B. In comparison, PURR has a market cap of 804.5M. Regarding current trading prices, UAN is priced at $132.19, while PURR trades at $6.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.47, whereas PURR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UAN's ROE is +0.40%, compared to PURR's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, UAN is less volatile compared to PURR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAN.Check PURR's competition here
UAN vs IPI Comparison May 2026
UAN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAN stands at 1.4B. In comparison, IPI has a market cap of 588.1M. Regarding current trading prices, UAN is priced at $132.19, while IPI trades at $43.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.47, whereas IPI's P/E ratio is 39.44. In terms of profitability, UAN's ROE is +0.40%, compared to IPI's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, UAN is less volatile compared to IPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAN.Check IPI's competition here
UAN vs AVD Comparison May 2026
UAN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAN stands at 1.4B. In comparison, AVD has a market cap of 83.7M. Regarding current trading prices, UAN is priced at $132.19, while AVD trades at $2.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.47, whereas AVD's P/E ratio is -1.84. In terms of profitability, UAN's ROE is +0.40%, compared to AVD's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, UAN is less volatile compared to AVD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAN.Check AVD's competition here
UAN vs BHST Comparison May 2026
UAN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAN stands at 1.4B. In comparison, BHST has a market cap of 63.9M. Regarding current trading prices, UAN is priced at $132.19, while BHST trades at $3.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.47, whereas BHST's P/E ratio is -6.15. In terms of profitability, UAN's ROE is +0.40%, compared to BHST's ROE of -1.59%. Regarding short-term risk, UAN is less volatile compared to BHST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAN.Check BHST's competition here
UAN vs MULG Comparison May 2026
UAN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAN stands at 1.4B. In comparison, MULG has a market cap of 49.1M. Regarding current trading prices, UAN is priced at $132.19, while MULG trades at $2.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.47, whereas MULG's P/E ratio is 18.21. In terms of profitability, UAN's ROE is +0.40%, compared to MULG's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UAN is more volatile compared to MULG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAN.Check MULG's competition here
UAN vs BHIL-WT Comparison May 2026
UAN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAN stands at 1.4B. In comparison, BHIL-WT has a market cap of 49M. Regarding current trading prices, UAN is priced at $132.19, while BHIL-WT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.47, whereas BHIL-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UAN's ROE is +0.40%, compared to BHIL-WT's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, UAN is less volatile compared to BHIL-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAN.Check BHIL-WT's competition here
UAN vs BIOX Comparison May 2026
UAN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAN stands at 1.4B. In comparison, BIOX has a market cap of 34.3M. Regarding current trading prices, UAN is priced at $132.19, while BIOX trades at $0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.47, whereas BIOX's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, UAN's ROE is +0.40%, compared to BIOX's ROE of -1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UAN is less volatile compared to BIOX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAN.Check BIOX's competition here
UAN vs FNUC Comparison May 2026
UAN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAN stands at 1.4B. In comparison, FNUC has a market cap of 31.7M. Regarding current trading prices, UAN is priced at $132.19, while FNUC trades at $2.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.47, whereas FNUC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UAN's ROE is +0.40%, compared to FNUC's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, UAN is less volatile compared to FNUC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAN.Check FNUC's competition here
UAN vs CGA Comparison May 2026
UAN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAN stands at 1.4B. In comparison, CGA has a market cap of 29.3M. Regarding current trading prices, UAN is priced at $132.19, while CGA trades at $1.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.47, whereas CGA's P/E ratio is -0.98. In terms of profitability, UAN's ROE is +0.40%, compared to CGA's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UAN is more volatile compared to CGA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAN.Check CGA's competition here
UAN vs LVRO Comparison May 2026
UAN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAN stands at 1.4B. In comparison, LVRO has a market cap of 15.1M. Regarding current trading prices, UAN is priced at $132.19, while LVRO trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.47, whereas LVRO's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, UAN's ROE is +0.40%, compared to LVRO's ROE of -1.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UAN is more volatile compared to LVRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAN.Check LVRO's competition here
UAN vs SEED Comparison May 2026
UAN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAN stands at 1.4B. In comparison, SEED has a market cap of 8.5M. Regarding current trading prices, UAN is priced at $132.19, while SEED trades at $1.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.47, whereas SEED's P/E ratio is -1.08. In terms of profitability, UAN's ROE is +0.40%, compared to SEED's ROE of +1.86%. Regarding short-term risk, UAN is more volatile compared to SEED. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAN.Check SEED's competition here
UAN vs AGRZ Comparison May 2026
UAN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAN stands at 1.4B. In comparison, AGRZ has a market cap of 7.4M. Regarding current trading prices, UAN is priced at $132.19, while AGRZ trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.47, whereas AGRZ's P/E ratio is 3.80. In terms of profitability, UAN's ROE is +0.40%, compared to AGRZ's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, UAN is less volatile compared to AGRZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAN.Check AGRZ's competition here
UAN vs NITO Comparison May 2026
UAN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAN stands at 1.4B. In comparison, NITO has a market cap of 4.5M. Regarding current trading prices, UAN is priced at $132.19, while NITO trades at $4.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.47, whereas NITO's P/E ratio is -0.37. In terms of profitability, UAN's ROE is +0.40%, compared to NITO's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, UAN is more volatile compared to NITO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAN.Check NITO's competition here
UAN vs SVFD Comparison May 2026
UAN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAN stands at 1.4B. In comparison, SVFD has a market cap of 4.2M. Regarding current trading prices, UAN is priced at $132.19, while SVFD trades at $1.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.47, whereas SVFD's P/E ratio is 0.07. In terms of profitability, UAN's ROE is +0.40%, compared to SVFD's ROE of -462.29%. Regarding short-term risk, UAN is less volatile compared to SVFD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAN.Check SVFD's competition here
UAN vs FMTO Comparison May 2026
UAN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAN stands at 1.4B. In comparison, FMTO has a market cap of 3.1M. Regarding current trading prices, UAN is priced at $132.19, while FMTO trades at $3.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.47, whereas FMTO's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, UAN's ROE is +0.40%, compared to FMTO's ROE of +75.78%. Regarding short-term risk, UAN is less volatile compared to FMTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAN.Check FMTO's competition here
UAN vs BHIL Comparison May 2026
UAN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAN stands at 1.4B. In comparison, BHIL has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, UAN is priced at $132.19, while BHIL trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.47, whereas BHIL's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, UAN's ROE is +0.40%, compared to BHIL's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, UAN is more volatile compared to BHIL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAN.Check BHIL's competition here
UAN vs RKDA Comparison May 2026
UAN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAN stands at 1.4B. In comparison, RKDA has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, UAN is priced at $132.19, while RKDA trades at $1.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.47, whereas RKDA's P/E ratio is -0.62. In terms of profitability, UAN's ROE is +0.40%, compared to RKDA's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, UAN is less volatile compared to RKDA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAN.Check RKDA's competition here
UAN vs YTEN Comparison May 2026
UAN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAN stands at 1.4B. In comparison, YTEN has a market cap of 345.5K. Regarding current trading prices, UAN is priced at $132.19, while YTEN trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.47, whereas YTEN's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, UAN's ROE is +0.40%, compared to YTEN's ROE of -15.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UAN is less volatile compared to YTEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAN.Check YTEN's competition here
UAN vs MBII Comparison May 2026
UAN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAN stands at 1.4B. In comparison, MBII has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, UAN is priced at $132.19, while MBII trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.47, whereas MBII's P/E ratio is -6.82. In terms of profitability, UAN's ROE is +0.40%, compared to MBII's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, UAN is less volatile compared to MBII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAN.Check MBII's competition here
UAN vs TNH Comparison May 2026
UAN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAN stands at 1.4B. In comparison, TNH has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, UAN is priced at $132.19, while TNH trades at $83.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.47, whereas TNH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UAN's ROE is +0.40%, compared to TNH's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, UAN is more volatile compared to TNH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAN.Check TNH's competition here