Intrepid Potash, Inc.
Intrepid Potash, Inc. (IPI) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (IPI) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Agricultural Inputs Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IPI | $43.75 | +15.71% | 588.1M | 39.44 | $1.11 | N/A |
| CTA-PB | $68.16 | -0.10% | 59.1B | N/A | N/A | +0.86% |
| CTVA | $82.83 | +2.10% | 55.4B | 44.78 | $1.85 | +0.86% |
| CTA-PA | $54.13 | -0.22% | 36.3B | N/A | N/A | +6.48% |
| NTR | $71.29 | +4.33% | 34.3B | 14.52 | $4.91 | +3.07% |
| CF | $124.48 | +8.22% | 19.1B | 11.21 | $11.10 | +1.61% |
| ICL | $6.50 | +2.04% | 8.4B | 36.08 | $0.18 | +2.76% |
| MOS | $21.79 | -1.80% | 6.9B | 12.82 | $1.70 | +4.06% |
| SMG | $60.03 | -1.72% | 3.5B | 17.25 | $3.48 | +4.42% |
| FMC | $13.11 | -2.16% | 1.6B | -0.67 | -$19.62 | +10.10% |
Stock Comparison
IPI vs CTA-PB Comparison May 2026
IPI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPI stands at 588.1M. In comparison, CTA-PB has a market cap of 59.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IPI is priced at $43.75, while CTA-PB trades at $68.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPI currently has a P/E ratio of 39.44, whereas CTA-PB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IPI's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CTA-PB's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IPI is more volatile compared to CTA-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPI.Check CTA-PB's competition here
IPI vs CTVA Comparison May 2026
IPI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPI stands at 588.1M. In comparison, CTVA has a market cap of 55.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IPI is priced at $43.75, while CTVA trades at $82.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPI currently has a P/E ratio of 39.44, whereas CTVA's P/E ratio is 44.78. In terms of profitability, IPI's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CTVA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IPI is more volatile compared to CTVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPI.Check CTVA's competition here
IPI vs CTA-PA Comparison May 2026
IPI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPI stands at 588.1M. In comparison, CTA-PA has a market cap of 36.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IPI is priced at $43.75, while CTA-PA trades at $54.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPI currently has a P/E ratio of 39.44, whereas CTA-PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IPI's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CTA-PA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IPI is more volatile compared to CTA-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPI.Check CTA-PA's competition here
IPI vs NTR Comparison May 2026
IPI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPI stands at 588.1M. In comparison, NTR has a market cap of 34.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IPI is priced at $43.75, while NTR trades at $71.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPI currently has a P/E ratio of 39.44, whereas NTR's P/E ratio is 14.52. In terms of profitability, IPI's ROE is +0.03%, compared to NTR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IPI is more volatile compared to NTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPI.Check NTR's competition here
IPI vs CF Comparison May 2026
IPI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPI stands at 588.1M. In comparison, CF has a market cap of 19.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IPI is priced at $43.75, while CF trades at $124.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPI currently has a P/E ratio of 39.44, whereas CF's P/E ratio is 11.21. In terms of profitability, IPI's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CF's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, IPI is more volatile compared to CF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPI.Check CF's competition here
IPI vs ICL Comparison May 2026
IPI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPI stands at 588.1M. In comparison, ICL has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IPI is priced at $43.75, while ICL trades at $6.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPI currently has a P/E ratio of 39.44, whereas ICL's P/E ratio is 36.08. In terms of profitability, IPI's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ICL's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, IPI is more volatile compared to ICL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPI.Check ICL's competition here
IPI vs MOS Comparison May 2026
IPI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPI stands at 588.1M. In comparison, MOS has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IPI is priced at $43.75, while MOS trades at $21.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPI currently has a P/E ratio of 39.44, whereas MOS's P/E ratio is 12.82. In terms of profitability, IPI's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MOS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IPI is more volatile compared to MOS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPI.Check MOS's competition here
IPI vs SMG Comparison May 2026
IPI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPI stands at 588.1M. In comparison, SMG has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IPI is priced at $43.75, while SMG trades at $60.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPI currently has a P/E ratio of 39.44, whereas SMG's P/E ratio is 17.25. In terms of profitability, IPI's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SMG's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, IPI is more volatile compared to SMG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPI.Check SMG's competition here
IPI vs FMC Comparison May 2026
IPI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPI stands at 588.1M. In comparison, FMC has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IPI is priced at $43.75, while FMC trades at $13.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPI currently has a P/E ratio of 39.44, whereas FMC's P/E ratio is -0.67. In terms of profitability, IPI's ROE is +0.03%, compared to FMC's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, IPI is more volatile compared to FMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPI.Check FMC's competition here
IPI vs UAN Comparison May 2026
IPI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPI stands at 588.1M. In comparison, UAN has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IPI is priced at $43.75, while UAN trades at $132.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPI currently has a P/E ratio of 39.44, whereas UAN's P/E ratio is 11.47. In terms of profitability, IPI's ROE is +0.03%, compared to UAN's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, IPI is more volatile compared to UAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPI.Check UAN's competition here
IPI vs PURR Comparison May 2026
IPI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPI stands at 588.1M. In comparison, PURR has a market cap of 804.5M. Regarding current trading prices, IPI is priced at $43.75, while PURR trades at $6.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPI currently has a P/E ratio of 39.44, whereas PURR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IPI's ROE is +0.03%, compared to PURR's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, IPI is more volatile compared to PURR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPI.Check PURR's competition here
IPI vs AVD Comparison May 2026
IPI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPI stands at 588.1M. In comparison, AVD has a market cap of 83.7M. Regarding current trading prices, IPI is priced at $43.75, while AVD trades at $2.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPI currently has a P/E ratio of 39.44, whereas AVD's P/E ratio is -1.84. In terms of profitability, IPI's ROE is +0.03%, compared to AVD's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, IPI is more volatile compared to AVD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPI.Check AVD's competition here
IPI vs BHST Comparison May 2026
IPI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPI stands at 588.1M. In comparison, BHST has a market cap of 63.9M. Regarding current trading prices, IPI is priced at $43.75, while BHST trades at $3.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPI currently has a P/E ratio of 39.44, whereas BHST's P/E ratio is -6.15. In terms of profitability, IPI's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BHST's ROE of -1.59%. Regarding short-term risk, IPI is more volatile compared to BHST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPI.Check BHST's competition here
IPI vs MULG Comparison May 2026
IPI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPI stands at 588.1M. In comparison, MULG has a market cap of 49.1M. Regarding current trading prices, IPI is priced at $43.75, while MULG trades at $2.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPI currently has a P/E ratio of 39.44, whereas MULG's P/E ratio is 18.21. In terms of profitability, IPI's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MULG's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IPI is more volatile compared to MULG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPI.Check MULG's competition here
IPI vs BHIL-WT Comparison May 2026
IPI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPI stands at 588.1M. In comparison, BHIL-WT has a market cap of 49M. Regarding current trading prices, IPI is priced at $43.75, while BHIL-WT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPI currently has a P/E ratio of 39.44, whereas BHIL-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IPI's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BHIL-WT's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, IPI is less volatile compared to BHIL-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPI.Check BHIL-WT's competition here
IPI vs BIOX Comparison May 2026
IPI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPI stands at 588.1M. In comparison, BIOX has a market cap of 34.3M. Regarding current trading prices, IPI is priced at $43.75, while BIOX trades at $0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPI currently has a P/E ratio of 39.44, whereas BIOX's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, IPI's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BIOX's ROE of -1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IPI is more volatile compared to BIOX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPI.Check BIOX's competition here
IPI vs FNUC Comparison May 2026
IPI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPI stands at 588.1M. In comparison, FNUC has a market cap of 31.7M. Regarding current trading prices, IPI is priced at $43.75, while FNUC trades at $2.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPI currently has a P/E ratio of 39.44, whereas FNUC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IPI's ROE is +0.03%, compared to FNUC's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, IPI is more volatile compared to FNUC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPI.Check FNUC's competition here
IPI vs CGA Comparison May 2026
IPI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPI stands at 588.1M. In comparison, CGA has a market cap of 29.3M. Regarding current trading prices, IPI is priced at $43.75, while CGA trades at $1.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPI currently has a P/E ratio of 39.44, whereas CGA's P/E ratio is -0.98. In terms of profitability, IPI's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CGA's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, IPI is more volatile compared to CGA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPI.Check CGA's competition here
IPI vs LVRO Comparison May 2026
IPI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPI stands at 588.1M. In comparison, LVRO has a market cap of 15.1M. Regarding current trading prices, IPI is priced at $43.75, while LVRO trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPI currently has a P/E ratio of 39.44, whereas LVRO's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, IPI's ROE is +0.03%, compared to LVRO's ROE of -1.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IPI is more volatile compared to LVRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPI.Check LVRO's competition here
IPI vs SEED Comparison May 2026
IPI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPI stands at 588.1M. In comparison, SEED has a market cap of 8.5M. Regarding current trading prices, IPI is priced at $43.75, while SEED trades at $1.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPI currently has a P/E ratio of 39.44, whereas SEED's P/E ratio is -1.08. In terms of profitability, IPI's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SEED's ROE of +1.86%. Regarding short-term risk, IPI is more volatile compared to SEED. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPI.Check SEED's competition here
IPI vs AGRZ Comparison May 2026
IPI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPI stands at 588.1M. In comparison, AGRZ has a market cap of 7.4M. Regarding current trading prices, IPI is priced at $43.75, while AGRZ trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPI currently has a P/E ratio of 39.44, whereas AGRZ's P/E ratio is 3.80. In terms of profitability, IPI's ROE is +0.03%, compared to AGRZ's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, IPI is more volatile compared to AGRZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPI.Check AGRZ's competition here
IPI vs NITO Comparison May 2026
IPI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPI stands at 588.1M. In comparison, NITO has a market cap of 4.5M. Regarding current trading prices, IPI is priced at $43.75, while NITO trades at $4.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPI currently has a P/E ratio of 39.44, whereas NITO's P/E ratio is -0.37. In terms of profitability, IPI's ROE is +0.03%, compared to NITO's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, IPI is more volatile compared to NITO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPI.Check NITO's competition here
IPI vs SVFD Comparison May 2026
IPI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPI stands at 588.1M. In comparison, SVFD has a market cap of 4.2M. Regarding current trading prices, IPI is priced at $43.75, while SVFD trades at $1.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPI currently has a P/E ratio of 39.44, whereas SVFD's P/E ratio is 0.07. In terms of profitability, IPI's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SVFD's ROE of -462.29%. Regarding short-term risk, IPI is more volatile compared to SVFD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPI.Check SVFD's competition here
IPI vs FMTO Comparison May 2026
IPI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPI stands at 588.1M. In comparison, FMTO has a market cap of 3.1M. Regarding current trading prices, IPI is priced at $43.75, while FMTO trades at $3.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPI currently has a P/E ratio of 39.44, whereas FMTO's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, IPI's ROE is +0.03%, compared to FMTO's ROE of +75.78%. Regarding short-term risk, IPI is less volatile compared to FMTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPI.Check FMTO's competition here
IPI vs BHIL Comparison May 2026
IPI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPI stands at 588.1M. In comparison, BHIL has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, IPI is priced at $43.75, while BHIL trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPI currently has a P/E ratio of 39.44, whereas BHIL's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, IPI's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BHIL's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, IPI is more volatile compared to BHIL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPI.Check BHIL's competition here
IPI vs RKDA Comparison May 2026
IPI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPI stands at 588.1M. In comparison, RKDA has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, IPI is priced at $43.75, while RKDA trades at $1.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPI currently has a P/E ratio of 39.44, whereas RKDA's P/E ratio is -0.62. In terms of profitability, IPI's ROE is +0.03%, compared to RKDA's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, IPI is more volatile compared to RKDA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPI.Check RKDA's competition here
IPI vs YTEN Comparison May 2026
IPI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPI stands at 588.1M. In comparison, YTEN has a market cap of 345.5K. Regarding current trading prices, IPI is priced at $43.75, while YTEN trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPI currently has a P/E ratio of 39.44, whereas YTEN's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, IPI's ROE is +0.03%, compared to YTEN's ROE of -15.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IPI is less volatile compared to YTEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPI.Check YTEN's competition here
IPI vs TNH Comparison May 2026
IPI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPI stands at 588.1M. In comparison, TNH has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, IPI is priced at $43.75, while TNH trades at $83.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPI currently has a P/E ratio of 39.44, whereas TNH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IPI's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TNH's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, IPI is more volatile compared to TNH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPI.Check TNH's competition here
IPI vs MBII Comparison May 2026
IPI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPI stands at 588.1M. In comparison, MBII has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, IPI is priced at $43.75, while MBII trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPI currently has a P/E ratio of 39.44, whereas MBII's P/E ratio is -6.82. In terms of profitability, IPI's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MBII's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, IPI is less volatile compared to MBII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPI.Check MBII's competition here