Tenaris S.A.

TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.26B. In comparison, SLB has a market cap of 46.44B. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $34.06, while SLB trades at $34.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.38, whereas SLB's P/E ratio is 10.98. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SLB's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is less volatile compared to SLB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.

TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.26B. In comparison, BKR has a market cap of 36.15B. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $34.06, while BKR trades at $36.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.38, whereas BKR's P/E ratio is 12.45. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BKR's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is less volatile compared to BKR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.

TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.26B. In comparison, TNRSF has a market cap of 18.58B. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $34.06, while TNRSF trades at $17.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.38, whereas TNRSF's P/E ratio is 10.40. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TNRSF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is more volatile compared to TNRSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.

TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.26B. In comparison, HAL has a market cap of 17.50B. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $34.06, while HAL trades at $20.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.38, whereas HAL's P/E ratio is 8.51. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HAL's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is less volatile compared to HAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.

TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.26B. In comparison, FTI has a market cap of 12.52B. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $34.06, while FTI trades at $29.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.38, whereas FTI's P/E ratio is 15.80. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FTI's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is less volatile compared to FTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.

TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.26B. In comparison, CHOLF has a market cap of 6.89B. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $34.06, while CHOLF trades at $0.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.38, whereas CHOLF's P/E ratio is 7.70. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CHOLF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is less volatile compared to CHOLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.

TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.26B. In comparison, THNPY has a market cap of 6.11B. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $34.06, while THNPY trades at $34.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.38, whereas THNPY's P/E ratio is 14.18. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to THNPY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is more volatile compared to THNPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.

TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.26B. In comparison, THNPF has a market cap of 5.97B. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $34.06, while THNPF trades at $34.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.38, whereas THNPF's P/E ratio is 13.95. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to THNPF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is less volatile compared to THNPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.

TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.26B. In comparison, GZPZF has a market cap of 5.46B. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $34.06, while GZPZF trades at $147.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.38, whereas GZPZF's P/E ratio is 13.90. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GZPZF's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is more volatile compared to GZPZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.

TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.26B. In comparison, LB has a market cap of 5.37B. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $34.06, while LB trades at $70.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.38, whereas LB's P/E ratio is -29.74. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LB's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is less volatile compared to LB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.

TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.26B. In comparison, CHX has a market cap of 4.81B. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $34.06, while CHX trades at $25.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.38, whereas CHX's P/E ratio is 16.62. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CHX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is less volatile compared to CHX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.

TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.26B. In comparison, ACGYF has a market cap of 4.71B. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $34.06, while ACGYF trades at $15.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.38, whereas ACGYF's P/E ratio is 24.88. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ACGYF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is more volatile compared to ACGYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.

TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.26B. In comparison, NOV has a market cap of 4.69B. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $34.06, while NOV trades at $12.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.38, whereas NOV's P/E ratio is 8.39. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NOV's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is less volatile compared to NOV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.

TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.26B. In comparison, SUBCY has a market cap of 4.68B. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $34.06, while SUBCY trades at $15.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.38, whereas SUBCY's P/E ratio is 24.73. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SUBCY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is more volatile compared to SUBCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.

TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.26B. In comparison, SAPMF has a market cap of 4.64B. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $34.06, while SAPMF trades at $2.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.38, whereas SAPMF's P/E ratio is 13.94. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SAPMF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is less volatile compared to SAPMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.

TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.26B. In comparison, AROC has a market cap of 4.37B. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $34.06, while AROC trades at $24.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.38, whereas AROC's P/E ratio is 20.76. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AROC's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is less volatile compared to AROC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.

TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.26B. In comparison, AKRYY has a market cap of 4.34B. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $34.06, while AKRYY trades at $9.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.38, whereas AKRYY's P/E ratio is 8.49. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AKRYY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is less volatile compared to AKRYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.

TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.26B. In comparison, WYGPY has a market cap of 3.92B. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $34.06, while WYGPY trades at $7.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.38, whereas WYGPY's P/E ratio is 16.11. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WYGPY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is more volatile compared to WYGPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.

TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.26B. In comparison, WYGPF has a market cap of 3.77B. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $34.06, while WYGPF trades at $7.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.38, whereas WYGPF's P/E ratio is 15.48. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WYGPF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is less volatile compared to WYGPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.

TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.26B. In comparison, SBFFF has a market cap of 3.66B. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $34.06, while SBFFF trades at $21.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.38, whereas SBFFF's P/E ratio is 25.48. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SBFFF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is less volatile compared to SBFFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.

TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.26B. In comparison, SBFFY has a market cap of 3.37B. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $34.06, while SBFFY trades at $19.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.38, whereas SBFFY's P/E ratio is 23.46. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SBFFY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is less volatile compared to SBFFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.

TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.26B. In comparison, WFRD has a market cap of 3.34B. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $34.06, while WFRD trades at $46.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.38, whereas WFRD's P/E ratio is 7.34. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WFRD's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is less volatile compared to WFRD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.

TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.26B. In comparison, KGS has a market cap of 3.13B. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $34.06, while KGS trades at $35.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.38, whereas KGS's P/E ratio is 63.64. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KGS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is less volatile compared to KGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.

TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.26B. In comparison, WHD has a market cap of 2.88B. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $34.06, while WHD trades at $42.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.38, whereas WHD's P/E ratio is 14.91. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WHD's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is less volatile compared to WHD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.

TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.26B. In comparison, USAC has a market cap of 2.84B. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $34.06, while USAC trades at $24.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.38, whereas USAC's P/E ratio is 33.60. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to USAC's ROE of +1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is less volatile compared to USAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.

TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.26B. In comparison, VAL-WT has a market cap of 2.76B. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $34.06, while VAL-WT trades at $3.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.38, whereas VAL-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VAL-WT's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is less volatile compared to VAL-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.

TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.26B. In comparison, VAL has a market cap of 2.72B. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $34.06, while VAL trades at $38.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.38, whereas VAL's P/E ratio is 9.02. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VAL's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is less volatile compared to VAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.

TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.26B. In comparison, TDW-WT has a market cap of 2.65B. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $34.06, while TDW-WT trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.38, whereas TDW-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TDW-WT's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is more volatile compared to TDW-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.

TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.26B. In comparison, NEX has a market cap of 2.42B. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $34.06, while NEX trades at $10.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.38, whereas NEX's P/E ratio is 3.94. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NEX's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is less volatile compared to NEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.

TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.26B. In comparison, TRRVF has a market cap of 2.33B. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $34.06, while TRRVF trades at $119.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.38, whereas TRRVF's P/E ratio is 43.93. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TRRVF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is more volatile compared to TRRVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.

TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.26B. In comparison, FLOC has a market cap of 2.08B. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $34.06, while FLOC trades at $22.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.38, whereas FLOC's P/E ratio is 24.92. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FLOC's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is less volatile compared to FLOC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.

TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.26B. In comparison, TDW has a market cap of 2.05B. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $34.06, while TDW trades at $41.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.38, whereas TDW's P/E ratio is 12.41. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TDW's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is less volatile compared to TDW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.

TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.26B. In comparison, LBRT has a market cap of 1.96B. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $34.06, while LBRT trades at $12.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.38, whereas LBRT's P/E ratio is 8.00. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LBRT's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is less volatile compared to LBRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.

TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.26B. In comparison, OII has a market cap of 1.92B. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $34.06, while OII trades at $19.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.38, whereas OII's P/E ratio is 10.70. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to OII's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is less volatile compared to OII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.

TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.26B. In comparison, AESI has a market cap of 1.55B. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $34.06, while AESI trades at $12.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.38, whereas AESI's P/E ratio is 41.92. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AESI's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is less volatile compared to AESI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.

TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.26B. In comparison, DNOW has a market cap of 1.54B. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $34.06, while DNOW trades at $14.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.38, whereas DNOW's P/E ratio is 19.74. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DNOW's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is less volatile compared to DNOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.

TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.26B. In comparison, SEI has a market cap of 1.51B. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $34.06, while SEI trades at $21.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.38, whereas SEI's P/E ratio is 43.56. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SEI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is less volatile compared to SEI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.

TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.26B. In comparison, CIMEF has a market cap of 1.49B. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $34.06, while CIMEF trades at $0.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.38, whereas CIMEF's P/E ratio is 10.48. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CIMEF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is less volatile compared to CIMEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.

TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.26B. In comparison, TGSNF has a market cap of 1.40B. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $34.06, while TGSNF trades at $7.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.38, whereas TGSNF's P/E ratio is 12.56. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TGSNF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is less volatile compared to TGSNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.

TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.26B. In comparison, AKRTF has a market cap of 1.33B. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $34.06, while AKRTF trades at $2.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.38, whereas AKRTF's P/E ratio is 5.23. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AKRTF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is more volatile compared to AKRTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.

TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.26B. In comparison, MDIKF has a market cap of 1.25B. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $34.06, while MDIKF trades at $18.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.38, whereas MDIKF's P/E ratio is 6.22. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MDIKF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is less volatile compared to MDIKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.

TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.26B. In comparison, SLCA has a market cap of 1.21B. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $34.06, while SLCA trades at $15.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.38, whereas SLCA's P/E ratio is 10.54. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SLCA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is more volatile compared to SLCA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.

TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.26B. In comparison, PFHC has a market cap of 1.21B. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $34.06, while PFHC trades at $22.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.38, whereas PFHC's P/E ratio is 105.14. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PFHC's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is less volatile compared to PFHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.

TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.26B. In comparison, GZPZY has a market cap of 1.07B. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $34.06, while GZPZY trades at $29.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.38, whereas GZPZY's P/E ratio is 13.68. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GZPZY's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is less volatile compared to GZPZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.

TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.26B. In comparison, MRC has a market cap of 1.06B. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $34.06, while MRC trades at $12.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.38, whereas MRC's P/E ratio is 24.04. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MRC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is less volatile compared to MRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.

TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.26B. In comparison, RES has a market cap of 1.05B. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $34.06, while RES trades at $4.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.38, whereas RES's P/E ratio is 13.25. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RES's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is less volatile compared to RES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.

TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.26B. In comparison, INVX has a market cap of 1.03B. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $34.06, while INVX trades at $14.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.38, whereas INVX's P/E ratio is 5.36. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to INVX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is less volatile compared to INVX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.

TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.26B. In comparison, HLX has a market cap of 989.49M. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $34.06, while HLX trades at $6.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.38, whereas HLX's P/E ratio is 11.87. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HLX's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is less volatile compared to HLX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.

TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.26B. In comparison, XPRO has a market cap of 954.28M. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $34.06, while XPRO trades at $8.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.38, whereas XPRO's P/E ratio is 14.02. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to XPRO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is less volatile compared to XPRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.

TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.26B. In comparison, CESDF has a market cap of 943.68M. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $34.06, while CESDF trades at $4.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.38, whereas CESDF's P/E ratio is 7.12. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CESDF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is less volatile compared to CESDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.

TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.26B. In comparison, WTTR has a market cap of 861.01M. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $34.06, while WTTR trades at $8.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.38, whereas WTTR's P/E ratio is 24.44. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WTTR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is less volatile compared to WTTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.

TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.26B. In comparison, PGEJF has a market cap of 859.02M. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $34.06, while PGEJF trades at $0.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.38, whereas PGEJF's P/E ratio is 22.50. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PGEJF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is more volatile compared to PGEJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.

TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.26B. In comparison, VTOL has a market cap of 855.48M. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $34.06, while VTOL trades at $29.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.38, whereas VTOL's P/E ratio is 7.62. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VTOL's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is less volatile compared to VTOL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.

TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.26B. In comparison, EFXT has a market cap of 846.66M. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $34.06, while EFXT trades at $6.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.38, whereas EFXT's P/E ratio is 26.23. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EFXT's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is less volatile compared to EFXT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.

TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.26B. In comparison, SAWLF has a market cap of 797.99M. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $34.06, while SAWLF trades at $11.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.38, whereas SAWLF's P/E ratio is -19.54. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SAWLF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is less volatile compared to SAWLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.

TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.26B. In comparison, NPKI has a market cap of 709.57M. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $34.06, while NPKI trades at $8.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.38, whereas NPKI's P/E ratio is 17.49. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NPKI's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is less volatile compared to NPKI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.

TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.26B. In comparison, ACDC has a market cap of 704.79M. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $34.06, while ACDC trades at $4.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.38, whereas ACDC's P/E ratio is -2.93. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ACDC's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is less volatile compared to ACDC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.

TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.26B. In comparison, PSYTF has a market cap of 630.16M. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $34.06, while PSYTF trades at $7.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.38, whereas PSYTF's P/E ratio is 12.21. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PSYTF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is more volatile compared to PSYTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.

TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.26B. In comparison, NR has a market cap of 627.11M. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $34.06, while NR trades at $7.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.38, whereas NR's P/E ratio is 19.08. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NR's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is less volatile compared to NR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.

TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.26B. In comparison, HNTIY has a market cap of 605.96M. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $34.06, while HNTIY trades at $3.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.38, whereas HNTIY's P/E ratio is -20.61. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HNTIY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is more volatile compared to HNTIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.

TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.26B. In comparison, NESRW has a market cap of 597.41M. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $34.06, while NESRW trades at $0.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.38, whereas NESRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NESRW's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is more volatile compared to NESRW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.

TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.26B. In comparison, NESR has a market cap of 597.41M. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $34.06, while NESR trades at $6.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.38, whereas NESR's P/E ratio is 7.78. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NESR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is less volatile compared to NESR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.

TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.26B. In comparison, PUMP has a market cap of 564.23M. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $34.06, while PUMP trades at $5.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.38, whereas PUMP's P/E ratio is -3.88. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PUMP's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is less volatile compared to PUMP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.

TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.26B. In comparison, TOLWF has a market cap of 561.35M. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $34.06, while TOLWF trades at $2.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.38, whereas TOLWF's P/E ratio is 7.64. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TOLWF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is less volatile compared to TOLWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.

TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.26B. In comparison, CLB has a market cap of 546.19M. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $34.06, while CLB trades at $11.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.38, whereas CLB's P/E ratio is 19.75. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CLB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is less volatile compared to CLB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.

TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.26B. In comparison, DRQ has a market cap of 530.91M. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $34.06, while DRQ trades at $15.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.38, whereas DRQ's P/E ratio is -19.76. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DRQ's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is less volatile compared to DRQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.

TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.26B. In comparison, SBOEF has a market cap of 527.47M. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $34.06, while SBOEF trades at $33.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.38, whereas SBOEF's P/E ratio is 9.27. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SBOEF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is less volatile compared to SBOEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.

TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.26B. In comparison, HNTIF has a market cap of 520.57M. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $34.06, while HNTIF trades at $3.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.38, whereas HNTIF's P/E ratio is -18.33. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HNTIF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is less volatile compared to HNTIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.

TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.26B. In comparison, SOI has a market cap of 498.11M. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $34.06, while SOI trades at $11.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.38, whereas SOI's P/E ratio is 17.15. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SOI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is less volatile compared to SOI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.

TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.26B. In comparison, NOA has a market cap of 468.63M. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $34.06, while NOA trades at $15.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.38, whereas NOA's P/E ratio is 14.35. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NOA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is less volatile compared to NOA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.

TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.26B. In comparison, ATONF has a market cap of 411.67M. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $34.06, while ATONF trades at $0.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.38, whereas ATONF's P/E ratio is 13.90. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ATONF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is less volatile compared to ATONF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.

TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.26B. In comparison, TTI has a market cap of 394.56M. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $34.06, while TTI trades at $2.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.38, whereas TTI's P/E ratio is 3.37. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TTI's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is less volatile compared to TTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.

TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.26B. In comparison, ATONY has a market cap of 381.86M. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $34.06, while ATONY trades at $25.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.38, whereas ATONY's P/E ratio is 11.21. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ATONY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is less volatile compared to ATONY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.

TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.26B. In comparison, FTK has a market cap of 352.55M. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $34.06, while FTK trades at $11.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.38, whereas FTK's P/E ratio is 34.76. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FTK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is less volatile compared to FTK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.

TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.26B. In comparison, CCLP has a market cap of 344.84M. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $34.06, while CCLP trades at $2.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.38, whereas CCLP's P/E ratio is -34.57. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CCLP's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is less volatile compared to CCLP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.

TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.26B. In comparison, CGGYY has a market cap of 324.63M. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $34.06, while CGGYY trades at $41.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.38, whereas CGGYY's P/E ratio is 43.44. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CGGYY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is less volatile compared to CGGYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.

TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.26B. In comparison, AKKVF has a market cap of 299.40M. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $34.06, while AKKVF trades at $1.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.38, whereas AKKVF's P/E ratio is 1.96. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AKKVF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is less volatile compared to AKKVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.

TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.26B. In comparison, OIS has a market cap of 279.34M. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $34.06, while OIS trades at $4.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.38, whereas OIS's P/E ratio is 56.44. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to OIS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is less volatile compared to OIS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.

TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.26B. In comparison, SHANF has a market cap of 270.25M. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $34.06, while SHANF trades at $0.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.38, whereas SHANF's P/E ratio is -3.25. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SHANF's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is less volatile compared to SHANF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.

TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.26B. In comparison, TOTZF has a market cap of 261.79M. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $34.06, while TOTZF trades at $6.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.38, whereas TOTZF's P/E ratio is 6.20. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TOTZF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is less volatile compared to TOTZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.

TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.26B. In comparison, NGS has a market cap of 256.03M. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $34.06, while NGS trades at $20.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.38, whereas NGS's P/E ratio is 14.93. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NGS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is less volatile compared to NGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.

TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.26B. In comparison, RNGR has a market cap of 254.45M. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $34.06, while RNGR trades at $11.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.38, whereas RNGR's P/E ratio is 12.85. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RNGR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is less volatile compared to RNGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.

TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.26B. In comparison, DDHLF has a market cap of 234.30M. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $34.06, while DDHLF trades at $0.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.38, whereas DDHLF's P/E ratio is 8.29. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DDHLF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is more volatile compared to DDHLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.

TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.26B. In comparison, BLYFF has a market cap of 233.71M. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $34.06, while BLYFF trades at $0.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.38, whereas BLYFF's P/E ratio is -1.15. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BLYFF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is more volatile compared to BLYFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.

TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.26B. In comparison, PDER has a market cap of 213.02M. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $34.06, while PDER trades at $324.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.38, whereas PDER's P/E ratio is 13.39. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PDER's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is more volatile compared to PDER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.

TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.26B. In comparison, CFWFF has a market cap of 209.57M. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $34.06, while CFWFF trades at $2.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.38, whereas CFWFF's P/E ratio is 34.86. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CFWFF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is more volatile compared to CFWFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.

TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.26B. In comparison, SNVVF has a market cap of 201.06M. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $34.06, while SNVVF trades at $2.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.38, whereas SNVVF's P/E ratio is 279.00. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SNVVF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is more volatile compared to SNVVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.

TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.26B. In comparison, FET has a market cap of 181.52M. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $34.06, while FET trades at $14.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.38, whereas FET's P/E ratio is -1.46. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FET's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is less volatile compared to FET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.

TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.26B. In comparison, JUTOY has a market cap of 177.43M. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $34.06, while JUTOY trades at $20.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.38, whereas JUTOY's P/E ratio is 3.33. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to JUTOY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is less volatile compared to JUTOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.

TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.26B. In comparison, PKDC has a market cap of 165.49M. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $34.06, while PKDC trades at $11.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.38, whereas PKDC's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PKDC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is more volatile compared to PKDC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.

TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.26B. In comparison, WFTSF has a market cap of 151.22M. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $34.06, while WFTSF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.38, whereas WFTSF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WFTSF's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is less volatile compared to WFTSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.

TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.26B. In comparison, BOOM has a market cap of 142.00M. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $34.06, while BOOM trades at $6.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.38, whereas BOOM's P/E ratio is -0.85. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BOOM's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is less volatile compared to BOOM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.

TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.26B. In comparison, POFCY has a market cap of 125.30M. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $34.06, while POFCY trades at $0.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.38, whereas POFCY's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to POFCY's ROE of +1.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is less volatile compared to POFCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.

TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.26B. In comparison, PFIE has a market cap of 117.35M. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $34.06, while PFIE trades at $2.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.38, whereas PFIE's P/E ratio is 13.37. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PFIE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is more volatile compared to PFIE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.

TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.26B. In comparison, SCEYF has a market cap of 117.30M. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $34.06, while SCEYF trades at $8.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.38, whereas SCEYF's P/E ratio is 16.98. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SCEYF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is more volatile compared to SCEYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.

TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.26B. In comparison, ETOLF has a market cap of 96.14M. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $34.06, while ETOLF trades at $1.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.38, whereas ETOLF's P/E ratio is 24.80. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ETOLF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is less volatile compared to ETOLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.

TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.26B. In comparison, PLSDF has a market cap of 94.56M. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $34.06, while PLSDF trades at $1.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.38, whereas PLSDF's P/E ratio is 9.30. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PLSDF's ROE of +0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is less volatile compared to PLSDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.

TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.26B. In comparison, LSE has a market cap of 91.25M. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $34.06, while LSE trades at $5.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.38, whereas LSE's P/E ratio is 11.17. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LSE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TS is less volatile compared to LSE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.

TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.26B. In comparison, SND has a market cap of 90.81M. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $34.06, while SND trades at $2.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.38, whereas SND's P/E ratio is 25.75. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SND's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is less volatile compared to SND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.

TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.26B. In comparison, PRSEF has a market cap of 88.45M. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $34.06, while PRSEF trades at $4.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.38, whereas PRSEF's P/E ratio is -1.23. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PRSEF's ROE of -4.63%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is less volatile compared to PRSEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.

TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.26B. In comparison, QSEP has a market cap of 84.49M. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $34.06, while QSEP trades at $0.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.38, whereas QSEP's P/E ratio is -18.53. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to QSEP's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is less volatile compared to QSEP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.

TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.26B. In comparison, DTI has a market cap of 84.35M. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $34.06, while DTI trades at $2.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.38, whereas DTI's P/E ratio is 26.33. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DTI's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is less volatile compared to DTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.

TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.26B. In comparison, NCSM has a market cap of 79.00M. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $34.06, while NCSM trades at $31.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.38, whereas NCSM's P/E ratio is 9.60. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NCSM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is less volatile compared to NCSM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.

TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.26B. In comparison, GEOS has a market cap of 77.04M. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $34.06, while GEOS trades at $6.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.38, whereas GEOS's P/E ratio is -7.54. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GEOS's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is less volatile compared to GEOS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.

TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.26B. In comparison, MCCRF has a market cap of 66.02M. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $34.06, while MCCRF trades at $2.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.38, whereas MCCRF's P/E ratio is 10.56. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MCCRF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is more volatile compared to MCCRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.

TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.26B. In comparison, CAWLF has a market cap of 65.31M. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $34.06, while CAWLF trades at $0.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.38, whereas CAWLF's P/E ratio is 2.10. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CAWLF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is more volatile compared to CAWLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.

TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.26B. In comparison, RCON has a market cap of 49.82M. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $34.06, while RCON trades at $1.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.38, whereas RCON's P/E ratio is -1.32. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RCON's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is more volatile compared to RCON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.

TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.26B. In comparison, DWSN has a market cap of 38.73M. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $34.06, while DWSN trades at $1.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.38, whereas DWSN's P/E ratio is -9.62. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DWSN's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is less volatile compared to DWSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.

TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.26B. In comparison, EEYUF has a market cap of 35.77M. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $34.06, while EEYUF trades at $0.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.38, whereas EEYUF's P/E ratio is 28.50. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EEYUF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is more volatile compared to EEYUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.

TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.26B. In comparison, KLXE has a market cap of 33.58M. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $34.06, while KLXE trades at $1.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.38, whereas KLXE's P/E ratio is -0.59. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KLXE's ROE of -11.34%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is less volatile compared to KLXE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.

TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.26B. In comparison, GWTI has a market cap of 33.06M. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $34.06, while GWTI trades at $0.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.38, whereas GWTI's P/E ratio is -7.50. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GWTI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is more volatile compared to GWTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.

TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.26B. In comparison, POFCF has a market cap of 31.53M. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $34.06, while POFCF trades at $0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.38, whereas POFCF's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to POFCF's ROE of +1.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is less volatile compared to POFCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.

TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.26B. In comparison, SDPI has a market cap of 30.70M. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $34.06, while SDPI trades at $1.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.38, whereas SDPI's P/E ratio is 7.21. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SDPI's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is less volatile compared to SDPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.

TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.26B. In comparison, NINE has a market cap of 28.91M. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $34.06, while NINE trades at $0.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.38, whereas NINE's P/E ratio is -0.61. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NINE's ROE of +0.76%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is less volatile compared to NINE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.

TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.26B. In comparison, QDRSF has a market cap of 28.20M. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $34.06, while QDRSF trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.38, whereas QDRSF's P/E ratio is -6.33. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to QDRSF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TS is more volatile compared to QDRSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.

TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.26B. In comparison, KLNG has a market cap of 25.64M. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $34.06, while KLNG trades at $2.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.38, whereas KLNG's P/E ratio is 9.86. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KLNG's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is more volatile compared to KLNG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.

TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.26B. In comparison, BWTX has a market cap of 21.26M. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $34.06, while BWTX trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.38, whereas BWTX's P/E ratio is -0.57. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BWTX's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is more volatile compared to BWTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.

TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.26B. In comparison, NSFDF has a market cap of 16.44M. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $34.06, while NSFDF trades at $0.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.38, whereas NSFDF's P/E ratio is -2.30. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NSFDF's ROE of -1.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is less volatile compared to NSFDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.

TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.26B. In comparison, WEIIF has a market cap of 15.58M. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $34.06, while WEIIF trades at $0.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.38, whereas WEIIF's P/E ratio is -0.61. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WEIIF's ROE of -0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is more volatile compared to WEIIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.

TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.26B. In comparison, ENGT has a market cap of 13.42M. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $34.06, while ENGT trades at $0.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.38, whereas ENGT's P/E ratio is -8.10. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ENGT's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is more volatile compared to ENGT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.

TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.26B. In comparison, FOYJ has a market cap of 12.31M. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $34.06, while FOYJ trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.38, whereas FOYJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FOYJ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TS is less volatile compared to FOYJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.

TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.26B. In comparison, HGHAF has a market cap of 7.62M. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $34.06, while HGHAF trades at $0.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.38, whereas HGHAF's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HGHAF's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is less volatile compared to HGHAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.

TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.26B. In comparison, CGPVF has a market cap of 7.02M. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $34.06, while CGPVF trades at $0.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.38, whereas CGPVF's P/E ratio is 1.03. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CGPVF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is less volatile compared to CGPVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.

TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.26B. In comparison, TAGP has a market cap of 5.67M. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $34.06, while TAGP trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.38, whereas TAGP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TAGP's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is less volatile compared to TAGP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.

TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.26B. In comparison, BRYFF has a market cap of 5.29M. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $34.06, while BRYFF trades at $0.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.38, whereas BRYFF's P/E ratio is -1.82. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BRYFF's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is less volatile compared to BRYFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.

TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.26B. In comparison, OXFCF has a market cap of 4.96M. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $34.06, while OXFCF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.38, whereas OXFCF's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to OXFCF's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is more volatile compared to OXFCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.

TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.26B. In comparison, CTNR has a market cap of 2.63M. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $34.06, while CTNR trades at $5.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.38, whereas CTNR's P/E ratio is 64.38. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CTNR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is less volatile compared to CTNR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.

TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.26B. In comparison, TXLZF has a market cap of 2.48M. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $34.06, while TXLZF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.38, whereas TXLZF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TXLZF's ROE of -4.57%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is less volatile compared to TXLZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.

TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.26B. In comparison, NWPIF has a market cap of 2.04M. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $34.06, while NWPIF trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.38, whereas NWPIF's P/E ratio is 1.85. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NWPIF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is more volatile compared to NWPIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.

TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.26B. In comparison, GLFH has a market cap of 1.22M. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $34.06, while GLFH trades at $3.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.38, whereas GLFH's P/E ratio is -37.50. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GLFH's ROE of -12.85%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is less volatile compared to GLFH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.

TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.26B. In comparison, SKPO has a market cap of 1.08M. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $34.06, while SKPO trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.38, whereas SKPO's P/E ratio is -2.75. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SKPO's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is less volatile compared to SKPO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.

TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.26B. In comparison, ENSV has a market cap of 1.08M. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $34.06, while ENSV trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.38, whereas ENSV's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ENSV's ROE of -4.70%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is less volatile compared to ENSV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.

TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.26B. In comparison, IRIG has a market cap of 440500.00. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $34.06, while IRIG trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.38, whereas IRIG's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to IRIG's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TS is less volatile compared to IRIG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.

TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.26B. In comparison, SMGI has a market cap of 338603.00. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $34.06, while SMGI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.38, whereas SMGI's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SMGI's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is more volatile compared to SMGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.

TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.26B. In comparison, CSSV has a market cap of 210630.00. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $34.06, while CSSV trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.38, whereas CSSV's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CSSV's ROE of +0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is more volatile compared to CSSV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.

TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.26B. In comparison, FSEI has a market cap of 145052.00. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $34.06, while FSEI trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.38, whereas FSEI's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FSEI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TS is less volatile compared to FSEI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.

TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.26B. In comparison, SSOF has a market cap of 139956.00. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $34.06, while SSOF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.38, whereas SSOF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SSOF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is more volatile compared to SSOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.

TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.26B. In comparison, IESCF has a market cap of 137338.00. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $34.06, while IESCF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.38, whereas IESCF's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to IESCF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TS is more volatile compared to IESCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.

TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.26B. In comparison, PKDCW has a market cap of 71676.00. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $34.06, while PKDCW trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.38, whereas PKDCW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PKDCW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is less volatile compared to PKDCW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.

TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.26B. In comparison, GPTC has a market cap of 67658.00. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $34.06, while GPTC trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.38, whereas GPTC's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GPTC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TS is less volatile compared to GPTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.

TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.26B. In comparison, WWNG has a market cap of 28641.00. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $34.06, while WWNG trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.38, whereas WWNG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WWNG's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TS is less volatile compared to WWNG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.

TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.26B. In comparison, USEI has a market cap of 26308.00. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $34.06, while USEI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.38, whereas USEI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to USEI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is less volatile compared to USEI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.

TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.26B. In comparison, CPYJ has a market cap of 24400.00. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $34.06, while CPYJ trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.38, whereas CPYJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CPYJ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TS is less volatile compared to CPYJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.

TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.26B. In comparison, SGUJ has a market cap of 15982.00. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $34.06, while SGUJ trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.38, whereas SGUJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SGUJ's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is more volatile compared to SGUJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.

TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.26B. In comparison, TEGR has a market cap of 12651.00. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $34.06, while TEGR trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.38, whereas TEGR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TEGR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TS is more volatile compared to TEGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.

TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.26B. In comparison, AURI has a market cap of 9105.00. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $34.06, while AURI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.38, whereas AURI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AURI's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is more volatile compared to AURI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.

TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.26B. In comparison, RTSO has a market cap of 6667.00. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $34.06, while RTSO trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.38, whereas RTSO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RTSO's ROE of -1.26%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is more volatile compared to RTSO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.

TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.26B. In comparison, SUBB has a market cap of 6004.00. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $34.06, while SUBB trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.38, whereas SUBB's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SUBB's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TS is less volatile compared to SUBB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.

TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.26B. In comparison, TXGE has a market cap of 5653.00. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $34.06, while TXGE trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.38, whereas TXGE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TXGE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TS is more volatile compared to TXGE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.

TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.26B. In comparison, LNDT has a market cap of 3645.00. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $34.06, while LNDT trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.38, whereas LNDT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LNDT's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is more volatile compared to LNDT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.

TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.26B. In comparison, CTBG has a market cap of 3126.00. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $34.06, while CTBG trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.38, whereas CTBG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CTBG's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TS is more volatile compared to CTBG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.

TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.26B. In comparison, BMMCF has a market cap of 2905.00. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $34.06, while BMMCF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.38, whereas BMMCF's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BMMCF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is less volatile compared to BMMCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.

TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.26B. In comparison, PTOG has a market cap of 2524.00. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $34.06, while PTOG trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.38, whereas PTOG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PTOG's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TS is less volatile compared to PTOG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.

TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.26B. In comparison, AMCF has a market cap of 1026.00. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $34.06, while AMCF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.38, whereas AMCF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AMCF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is less volatile compared to AMCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.

TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.26B. In comparison, CDVIQ has a market cap of 986.00. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $34.06, while CDVIQ trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.38, whereas CDVIQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CDVIQ's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is less volatile compared to CDVIQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.

TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.26B. In comparison, POOSF has a market cap of 811.00. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $34.06, while POOSF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.38, whereas POOSF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to POOSF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TS is less volatile compared to POOSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.

TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.26B. In comparison, EHYD has a market cap of 603.00. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $34.06, while EHYD trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.38, whereas EHYD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EHYD's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TS is more volatile compared to EHYD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.

TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.26B. In comparison, NNYR has a market cap of 234.00. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $34.06, while NNYR trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.38, whereas NNYR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NNYR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TS is more volatile compared to NNYR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.

TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.26B. In comparison, SYNE has a market cap of 158.00. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $34.06, while SYNE trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.38, whereas SYNE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SYNE's ROE of -59.70%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is less volatile compared to SYNE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.

TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.26B. In comparison, ALRY has a market cap of 117.00. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $34.06, while ALRY trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.38, whereas ALRY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ALRY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TS is more volatile compared to ALRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.

TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.26B. In comparison, ISYX has a market cap of 102.00. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $34.06, while ISYX trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.38, whereas ISYX's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ISYX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TS is more volatile compared to ISYX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.

TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.26B. In comparison, CHMR has a market cap of 66.00. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $34.06, while CHMR trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.38, whereas CHMR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CHMR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TS is more volatile compared to CHMR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.

TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.26B. In comparison, EXTN comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $34.06, while EXTN trades at $4.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.38, whereas EXTN's P/E ratio is -1.35. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EXTN's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is less volatile compared to EXTN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.

TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.26B. In comparison, SAPMD comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $34.06, while SAPMD trades at $0.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.38, whereas SAPMD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SAPMD's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is less volatile compared to SAPMD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.

TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.26B. In comparison, ACDCW comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $34.06, while ACDCW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.38, whereas ACDCW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ACDCW's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is less volatile compared to ACDCW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.

TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.26B. In comparison, USWS comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $34.06, while USWS trades at $7.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.38, whereas USWS's P/E ratio is -3.94. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to USWS's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is less volatile compared to USWS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.

TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.26B. In comparison, IOGPQ comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $34.06, while IOGPQ trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.38, whereas IOGPQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to IOGPQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TS is more volatile compared to IOGPQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.

TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.26B. In comparison, IO comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $34.06, while IO trades at $0.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.38, whereas IO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to IO's ROE of +0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is less volatile compared to IO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.

TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.26B. In comparison, ENRFF comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $34.06, while ENRFF trades at $4.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.38, whereas ENRFF's P/E ratio is -24.26. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ENRFF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TS is more volatile compared to ENRFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.

TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.26B. In comparison, MSEIF comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $34.06, while MSEIF trades at $0.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.38, whereas MSEIF's P/E ratio is -3.59. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MSEIF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TS is more volatile compared to MSEIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.

TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.26B. In comparison, CELP comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $34.06, while CELP trades at $0.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.38, whereas CELP's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CELP's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is less volatile compared to CELP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.

TS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TS stands at 18.26B. In comparison, FTSI comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, TS is priced at $34.06, while FTSI trades at $26.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.38, whereas FTSI's P/E ratio is 4.67. In terms of profitability, TS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FTSI's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TS is less volatile compared to FTSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TS.