Kodiak Gas Services, Inc.
Kodiak Gas Services, Inc. (KGS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (KGS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Oil & Gas Equipment & Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KGS | $66.14 | +0.25% | 5.8B | 74.31 | $0.89 | +2.85% |
| SLB | $55.25 | -1.60% | 82.9B | 24.34 | $2.27 | +2.05% |
| BKR | $68.40 | -0.79% | 67.8B | 21.85 | $3.13 | +1.32% |
| TS | $63.19 | -0.16% | 33.9B | 17.08 | $3.70 | +2.69% |
| HAL | $40.12 | -0.59% | 33.5B | 22.17 | $1.81 | +1.69% |
| FTI | $75.11 | +0.47% | 30B | 32.66 | $2.30 | +0.27% |
| WFRD | $109.69 | +1.06% | 7.9B | 17.17 | $6.39 | +0.94% |
| NOV | $20.83 | +1.59% | 7.5B | 53.40 | $0.39 | +2.57% |
| VAL | $97.34 | +6.74% | 6.7B | 7.02 | $13.86 | N/A |
| AROC | $37.39 | +0.16% | 6.6B | 20.44 | $1.83 | +2.22% |
Stock Comparison
KGS vs SLB Comparison April 2026
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 5.8B. In comparison, SLB has a market cap of 82.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $66.14, while SLB trades at $55.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.31, whereas SLB's P/E ratio is 24.34. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SLB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is less volatile compared to SLB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.Check SLB's competition here
KGS vs BKR Comparison April 2026
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 5.8B. In comparison, BKR has a market cap of 67.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $66.14, while BKR trades at $68.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.31, whereas BKR's P/E ratio is 21.85. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BKR's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is less volatile compared to BKR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.Check BKR's competition here
KGS vs TS Comparison April 2026
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 5.8B. In comparison, TS has a market cap of 33.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $66.14, while TS trades at $63.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.31, whereas TS's P/E ratio is 17.08. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is more volatile compared to TS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.Check TS's competition here
KGS vs HAL Comparison April 2026
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 5.8B. In comparison, HAL has a market cap of 33.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $66.14, while HAL trades at $40.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.31, whereas HAL's P/E ratio is 22.17. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HAL's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is less volatile compared to HAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.Check HAL's competition here
KGS vs FTI Comparison April 2026
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 5.8B. In comparison, FTI has a market cap of 30B. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $66.14, while FTI trades at $75.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.31, whereas FTI's P/E ratio is 32.66. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FTI's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is less volatile compared to FTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.Check FTI's competition here
KGS vs WFRD Comparison April 2026
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 5.8B. In comparison, WFRD has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $66.14, while WFRD trades at $109.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.31, whereas WFRD's P/E ratio is 17.17. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to WFRD's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is less volatile compared to WFRD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.Check WFRD's competition here
KGS vs NOV Comparison April 2026
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 5.8B. In comparison, NOV has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $66.14, while NOV trades at $20.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.31, whereas NOV's P/E ratio is 53.40. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NOV's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is less volatile compared to NOV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.Check NOV's competition here
KGS vs VAL Comparison April 2026
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 5.8B. In comparison, VAL has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $66.14, while VAL trades at $97.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.31, whereas VAL's P/E ratio is 7.02. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to VAL's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is less volatile compared to VAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.Check VAL's competition here
KGS vs AROC Comparison April 2026
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 5.8B. In comparison, AROC has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $66.14, while AROC trades at $37.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.31, whereas AROC's P/E ratio is 20.44. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AROC's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS and AROC have similar daily volatility (1.63).Check AROC's competition here
KGS vs LB Comparison April 2026
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 5.8B. In comparison, LB has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $66.14, while LB trades at $69.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.31, whereas LB's P/E ratio is 73.76. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is less volatile compared to LB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.Check LB's competition here
KGS vs LBRT Comparison April 2026
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 5.8B. In comparison, LBRT has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $66.14, while LBRT trades at $32.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.31, whereas LBRT's P/E ratio is 36.12. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LBRT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is less volatile compared to LBRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.Check LBRT's competition here
KGS vs SEI Comparison April 2026
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 5.8B. In comparison, SEI has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $66.14, while SEI trades at $71.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.31, whereas SEI's P/E ratio is 107.30. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SEI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is less volatile compared to SEI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.Check SEI's competition here
KGS vs CHX Comparison April 2026
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 5.8B. In comparison, CHX has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $66.14, while CHX trades at $25.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.31, whereas CHX's P/E ratio is 17.09. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CHX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is more volatile compared to CHX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.Check CHX's competition here
KGS vs TDW Comparison April 2026
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 5.8B. In comparison, TDW has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $66.14, while TDW trades at $91.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.31, whereas TDW's P/E ratio is 13.73. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TDW's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is less volatile compared to TDW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.Check TDW's competition here
KGS vs WHD Comparison April 2026
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 5.8B. In comparison, WHD has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $66.14, while WHD trades at $56.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.31, whereas WHD's P/E ratio is 23.62. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to WHD's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is more volatile compared to WHD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.Check WHD's competition here
KGS vs OII Comparison April 2026
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 5.8B. In comparison, OII has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $66.14, while OII trades at $37.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.31, whereas OII's P/E ratio is 11.31. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to OII's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is less volatile compared to OII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.Check OII's competition here
KGS vs USAC Comparison April 2026
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 5.8B. In comparison, USAC has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $66.14, while USAC trades at $26.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.31, whereas USAC's P/E ratio is 31.52. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to USAC's ROE of -1.79%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is more volatile compared to USAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.Check USAC's competition here
KGS vs EFXT Comparison April 2026
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 5.8B. In comparison, EFXT has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $66.14, while EFXT trades at $25.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.31, whereas EFXT's P/E ratio is 49.17. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to EFXT's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is less volatile compared to EFXT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.Check EFXT's competition here
KGS vs CAM Comparison April 2026
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 5.8B. In comparison, CAM has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $66.14, while CAM trades at $66.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.31, whereas CAM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CAM's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is more volatile compared to CAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.Check CAM's competition here
KGS vs TDW-WT Comparison April 2026
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 5.8B. In comparison, TDW-WT has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $66.14, while TDW-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.31, whereas TDW-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TDW-WT's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is more volatile compared to TDW-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.Check TDW-WT's competition here
KGS vs NESR Comparison April 2026
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 5.8B. In comparison, NESR has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $66.14, while NESR trades at $24.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.31, whereas NESR's P/E ratio is 47.75. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NESR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is less volatile compared to NESR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.Check NESR's competition here
KGS vs NEX Comparison April 2026
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 5.8B. In comparison, NEX has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $66.14, while NEX trades at $10.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.31, whereas NEX's P/E ratio is 3.94. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NEX's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is less volatile compared to NEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.Check NEX's competition here
KGS vs FLOC Comparison April 2026
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 5.8B. In comparison, FLOC has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $66.14, while FLOC trades at $23.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.31, whereas FLOC's P/E ratio is 19.30. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FLOC's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is less volatile compared to FLOC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.Check FLOC's competition here
KGS vs PUMP Comparison April 2026
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 5.8B. In comparison, PUMP has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $66.14, while PUMP trades at $17.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.31, whereas PUMP's P/E ratio is 1720.50. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PUMP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is less volatile compared to PUMP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.Check PUMP's competition here
KGS vs AESI Comparison April 2026
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 5.8B. In comparison, AESI has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $66.14, while AESI trades at $16.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.31, whereas AESI's P/E ratio is -40.71. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AESI's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is less volatile compared to AESI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.Check AESI's competition here
KGS vs XPRO Comparison April 2026
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 5.8B. In comparison, XPRO has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $66.14, while XPRO trades at $17.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.31, whereas XPRO's P/E ratio is 39.58. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to XPRO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is less volatile compared to XPRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.Check XPRO's competition here
KGS vs INVX Comparison April 2026
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 5.8B. In comparison, INVX has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $66.14, while INVX trades at $28.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.31, whereas INVX's P/E ratio is 23.38. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to INVX's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is less volatile compared to INVX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.Check INVX's competition here
KGS vs RES Comparison April 2026
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 5.8B. In comparison, RES has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $66.14, while RES trades at $7.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.31, whereas RES's P/E ratio is 52.20. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RES's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is less volatile compared to RES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.Check RES's competition here
KGS vs DNOW Comparison April 2026
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 5.8B. In comparison, DNOW has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $66.14, while DNOW trades at $12.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.31, whereas DNOW's P/E ratio is -16.72. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DNOW's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is less volatile compared to DNOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.Check DNOW's competition here
KGS vs HLX Comparison April 2026
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 5.8B. In comparison, HLX has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $66.14, while HLX trades at $9.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.31, whereas HLX's P/E ratio is 99.30. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HLX's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is less volatile compared to HLX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.Check HLX's competition here
KGS vs VTOL Comparison April 2026
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 5.8B. In comparison, VTOL has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $66.14, while VTOL trades at $49.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.31, whereas VTOL's P/E ratio is 11.36. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to VTOL's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is less volatile compared to VTOL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.Check VTOL's competition here
KGS vs NPKI Comparison April 2026
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 5.8B. In comparison, NPKI has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $66.14, while NPKI trades at $16.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.31, whereas NPKI's P/E ratio is 38.31. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NPKI's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is less volatile compared to NPKI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.Check NPKI's competition here
KGS vs TTI Comparison April 2026
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 5.8B. In comparison, TTI has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $66.14, while TTI trades at $9.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.31, whereas TTI's P/E ratio is 324.67. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TTI's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is less volatile compared to TTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.Check TTI's competition here
KGS vs ACDC Comparison April 2026
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 5.8B. In comparison, ACDC has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $66.14, while ACDC trades at $7.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.31, whereas ACDC's P/E ratio is -3.22. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ACDC's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is less volatile compared to ACDC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.Check ACDC's competition here
KGS vs SLCA Comparison April 2026
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 5.8B. In comparison, SLCA has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $66.14, while SLCA trades at $15.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.31, whereas SLCA's P/E ratio is 10.54. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SLCA's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is more volatile compared to SLCA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.Check SLCA's competition here
KGS vs PFHC Comparison April 2026
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 5.8B. In comparison, PFHC has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $66.14, while PFHC trades at $22.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.31, whereas PFHC's P/E ratio is 105.14. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PFHC's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is less volatile compared to PFHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.Check PFHC's competition here
KGS vs VAL-WT Comparison April 2026
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 5.8B. In comparison, VAL-WT has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $66.14, while VAL-WT trades at $16.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.31, whereas VAL-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to VAL-WT's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is less volatile compared to VAL-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.Check VAL-WT's competition here
KGS vs MRC Comparison April 2026
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 5.8B. In comparison, MRC has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $66.14, while MRC trades at $13.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.31, whereas MRC's P/E ratio is 59.91. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MRC's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is less volatile compared to MRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.Check MRC's competition here
KGS vs HMH Comparison April 2026
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 5.8B. In comparison, HMH has a market cap of 905M. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $66.14, while HMH trades at $21.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.31, whereas HMH's P/E ratio is 28.38. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HMH's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is less volatile compared to HMH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.Check HMH's competition here
KGS vs CLB Comparison April 2026
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 5.8B. In comparison, CLB has a market cap of 796.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $66.14, while CLB trades at $17.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.31, whereas CLB's P/E ratio is 27.46. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CLB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is less volatile compared to CLB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.Check CLB's competition here
KGS vs FET Comparison April 2026
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 5.8B. In comparison, FET has a market cap of 715.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $66.14, while FET trades at $63.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.31, whereas FET's P/E ratio is -78.01. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FET's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is less volatile compared to FET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.Check FET's competition here
KGS vs NESRW Comparison April 2026
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 5.8B. In comparison, NESRW has a market cap of 709.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $66.14, while NESRW trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.31, whereas NESRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NESRW's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is less volatile compared to NESRW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.Check NESRW's competition here
KGS vs OIS Comparison April 2026
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 5.8B. In comparison, OIS has a market cap of 674.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $66.14, while OIS trades at $11.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.31, whereas OIS's P/E ratio is -6.02. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to OIS's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is less volatile compared to OIS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.Check OIS's competition here
KGS vs NR Comparison April 2026
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 5.8B. In comparison, NR has a market cap of 627.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $66.14, while NR trades at $7.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.31, whereas NR's P/E ratio is 19.08. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is less volatile compared to NR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.Check NR's competition here
KGS vs DRQ Comparison April 2026
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 5.8B. In comparison, DRQ has a market cap of 530.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $66.14, while DRQ trades at $15.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.31, whereas DRQ's P/E ratio is -19.76. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DRQ's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is less volatile compared to DRQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.Check DRQ's competition here
KGS vs FTK Comparison April 2026
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 5.8B. In comparison, FTK has a market cap of 516.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $66.14, while FTK trades at $17.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.31, whereas FTK's P/E ratio is 20.42. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FTK's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is less volatile compared to FTK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.Check FTK's competition here
KGS vs NGS Comparison April 2026
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 5.8B. In comparison, NGS has a market cap of 501.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $66.14, while NGS trades at $39.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.31, whereas NGS's P/E ratio is 25.37. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NGS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is less volatile compared to NGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.Check NGS's competition here
KGS vs SOI Comparison April 2026
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 5.8B. In comparison, SOI has a market cap of 498.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $66.14, while SOI trades at $11.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.31, whereas SOI's P/E ratio is 17.15. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SOI's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is less volatile compared to SOI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.Check SOI's competition here
KGS vs RNGR Comparison April 2026
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 5.8B. In comparison, RNGR has a market cap of 439.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $66.14, while RNGR trades at $18.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.31, whereas RNGR's P/E ratio is 34.04. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RNGR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is less volatile compared to RNGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.Check RNGR's competition here
KGS vs NINE Comparison April 2026
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 5.8B. In comparison, NINE has a market cap of 408M. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $66.14, while NINE trades at $9.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.31, whereas NINE's P/E ratio is -7.54. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NINE's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is less volatile compared to NINE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.Check NINE's competition here
KGS vs NOA Comparison April 2026
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 5.8B. In comparison, NOA has a market cap of 407.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $66.14, while NOA trades at $14.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.31, whereas NOA's P/E ratio is 17.23. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NOA's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is less volatile compared to NOA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.Check NOA's competition here
KGS vs CCLP Comparison April 2026
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 5.8B. In comparison, CCLP has a market cap of 344.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $66.14, while CCLP trades at $2.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.31, whereas CCLP's P/E ratio is -34.57. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CCLP's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is less volatile compared to CCLP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.Check CCLP's competition here
KGS vs SND Comparison April 2026
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 5.8B. In comparison, SND has a market cap of 232.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $66.14, while SND trades at $5.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.31, whereas SND's P/E ratio is 180.33. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SND's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is less volatile compared to SND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.Check SND's competition here
KGS vs OMSE Comparison April 2026
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 5.8B. In comparison, OMSE has a market cap of 213.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $66.14, while OMSE trades at $5.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.31, whereas OMSE's P/E ratio is 7.28. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to OMSE's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is less volatile compared to OMSE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.Check OMSE's competition here
KGS vs NCSM Comparison April 2026
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 5.8B. In comparison, NCSM has a market cap of 205.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $66.14, while NCSM trades at $77.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.31, whereas NCSM's P/E ratio is 9.05. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NCSM's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is less volatile compared to NCSM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.Check NCSM's competition here
KGS vs GEOS Comparison April 2026
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 5.8B. In comparison, GEOS has a market cap of 135.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $66.14, while GEOS trades at $10.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.31, whereas GEOS's P/E ratio is -4.81. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GEOS's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is less volatile compared to GEOS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.Check GEOS's competition here
KGS vs BOOM Comparison April 2026
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 5.8B. In comparison, BOOM has a market cap of 132.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $66.14, while BOOM trades at $6.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.31, whereas BOOM's P/E ratio is -7.18. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BOOM's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is less volatile compared to BOOM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.Check BOOM's competition here
KGS vs PFIE Comparison April 2026
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 5.8B. In comparison, PFIE has a market cap of 117.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $66.14, while PFIE trades at $2.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.31, whereas PFIE's P/E ratio is 13.37. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PFIE's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is more volatile compared to PFIE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.Check PFIE's competition here
KGS vs DTI Comparison April 2026
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 5.8B. In comparison, DTI has a market cap of 112.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $66.14, while DTI trades at $3.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.31, whereas DTI's P/E ratio is -29.05. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DTI's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is less volatile compared to DTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.Check DTI's competition here
KGS vs DWSN Comparison April 2026
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 5.8B. In comparison, DWSN has a market cap of 112.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $66.14, while DWSN trades at $3.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.31, whereas DWSN's P/E ratio is -60.33. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DWSN's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is less volatile compared to DWSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.Check DWSN's competition here
KGS vs LSE Comparison April 2026
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 5.8B. In comparison, LSE has a market cap of 88M. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $66.14, while LSE trades at $5.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.31, whereas LSE's P/E ratio is 64.63. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LSE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is less volatile compared to LSE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.Check LSE's competition here
KGS vs KLXE Comparison April 2026
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 5.8B. In comparison, KLXE has a market cap of 68.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $66.14, while KLXE trades at $3.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.31, whereas KLXE's P/E ratio is -0.85. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KLXE's ROE of +1.47%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is less volatile compared to KLXE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.Check KLXE's competition here
KGS vs SDPI Comparison April 2026
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 5.8B. In comparison, SDPI has a market cap of 30.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $66.14, while SDPI trades at $1.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.31, whereas SDPI's P/E ratio is 7.21. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SDPI's ROE of +0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is more volatile compared to SDPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.Check SDPI's competition here
KGS vs RCON Comparison April 2026
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 5.8B. In comparison, RCON has a market cap of 30M. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $66.14, while RCON trades at $0.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.31, whereas RCON's P/E ratio is -2.23. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RCON's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is less volatile compared to RCON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.Check RCON's competition here
KGS vs STAK Comparison April 2026
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 5.8B. In comparison, STAK has a market cap of 9M. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $66.14, while STAK trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.31, whereas STAK's P/E ratio is -1.59. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to STAK's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is less volatile compared to STAK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.Check STAK's competition here
KGS vs ENSV Comparison April 2026
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 5.8B. In comparison, ENSV has a market cap of 29.1K. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $66.14, while ENSV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.31, whereas ENSV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ENSV's ROE of -28.53%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is less volatile compared to ENSV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.Check ENSV's competition here
KGS vs VLI Comparison April 2026
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 5.8B. In comparison, VLI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $66.14, while VLI trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.31, whereas VLI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to VLI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is less volatile compared to VLI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.Check VLI's competition here
KGS vs GLF Comparison April 2026
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 5.8B. In comparison, GLF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $66.14, while GLF trades at $28.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.31, whereas GLF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GLF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is less volatile compared to GLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.Check GLF's competition here
KGS vs TDW-WTA Comparison April 2026
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 5.8B. In comparison, TDW-WTA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $66.14, while TDW-WTA trades at $2.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.31, whereas TDW-WTA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TDW-WTA's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is less volatile compared to TDW-WTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.Check TDW-WTA's competition here
KGS vs ACDCW Comparison April 2026
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 5.8B. In comparison, ACDCW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $66.14, while ACDCW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.31, whereas ACDCW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ACDCW's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is less volatile compared to ACDCW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.Check ACDCW's competition here
KGS vs IO Comparison April 2026
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 5.8B. In comparison, IO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $66.14, while IO trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.31, whereas IO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to IO's ROE of +0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is less volatile compared to IO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.Check IO's competition here
KGS vs USWS Comparison April 2026
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 5.8B. In comparison, USWS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $66.14, while USWS trades at $7.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.31, whereas USWS's P/E ratio is -3.94. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to USWS's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is less volatile compared to USWS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.Check USWS's competition here
KGS vs EXTN Comparison April 2026
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 5.8B. In comparison, EXTN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $66.14, while EXTN trades at $4.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.31, whereas EXTN's P/E ratio is -1.35. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to EXTN's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is less volatile compared to EXTN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.Check EXTN's competition here
KGS vs CETC Comparison April 2026
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 5.8B. In comparison, CETC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $66.14, while CETC trades at $4.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.31, whereas CETC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CETC's ROE of -1.15%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is less volatile compared to CETC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.Check CETC's competition here
KGS vs FTSI Comparison April 2026
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 5.8B. In comparison, FTSI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $66.14, while FTSI trades at $26.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.31, whereas FTSI's P/E ratio is 4.67. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FTSI's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is less volatile compared to FTSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.Check FTSI's competition here
KGS vs USWSW Comparison April 2026
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 5.8B. In comparison, USWSW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $66.14, while USWSW trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.31, whereas USWSW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to USWSW's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is less volatile compared to USWSW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.Check USWSW's competition here
KGS vs CELP Comparison April 2026
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 5.8B. In comparison, CELP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $66.14, while CELP trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.31, whereas CELP's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CELP's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is less volatile compared to CELP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.Check CELP's competition here
KGS vs TDW-WTB Comparison April 2026
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 5.8B. In comparison, TDW-WTB has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $66.14, while TDW-WTB trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.31, whereas TDW-WTB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TDW-WTB's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is less volatile compared to TDW-WTB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.Check TDW-WTB's competition here
KGS vs APLP Comparison April 2026
KGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KGS stands at 5.8B. In comparison, APLP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KGS is priced at $66.14, while APLP trades at $15.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KGS currently has a P/E ratio of 74.31, whereas APLP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KGS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to APLP's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, KGS is more volatile compared to APLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KGS.Check APLP's competition here