Natural Gas Services Group, Inc.
Natural Gas Services Group, Inc. (NGS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (NGS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Oil & Gas Equipment & Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NGS | $43.81 | +4.09% | 533.3M | 24.63 | $1.72 | +0.75% |
| SLB | $56.85 | +1.97% | 82.8B | 24.39 | $2.27 | +2.07% |
| BKR | $65.44 | +1.28% | 63.6B | 20.49 | $3.13 | +1.43% |
| HAL | $42.72 | +3.46% | 34.9B | 23.07 | $1.81 | +1.64% |
| TS | $62.09 | -1.18% | 33.1B | 16.26 | $3.80 | +2.75% |
| FTI | $72.77 | -0.34% | 28.4B | 27.30 | $2.61 | +0.28% |
| WFRD | $109.71 | +0.48% | 7.8B | 17.03 | $6.39 | +0.97% |
| NOV | $21.02 | +1.99% | 7.3B | 81.46 | $0.25 | +2.58% |
| VAL | $113.60 | +10.00% | 7.3B | 7.44 | $14.15 | N/A |
| AROC | $38.27 | +2.82% | 6.6B | 20.35 | $1.84 | +2.31% |
Stock Comparison
NGS vs SLB Comparison May 2026
NGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NGS stands at 533.3M. In comparison, SLB has a market cap of 82.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NGS is priced at $43.81, while SLB trades at $56.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NGS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas SLB's P/E ratio is 24.39. In terms of profitability, NGS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SLB's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NGS is less volatile compared to SLB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NGS.Check SLB's competition here
NGS vs BKR Comparison May 2026
NGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NGS stands at 533.3M. In comparison, BKR has a market cap of 63.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NGS is priced at $43.81, while BKR trades at $65.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NGS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas BKR's P/E ratio is 20.49. In terms of profitability, NGS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BKR's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NGS is less volatile compared to BKR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NGS.Check BKR's competition here
NGS vs HAL Comparison May 2026
NGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NGS stands at 533.3M. In comparison, HAL has a market cap of 34.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NGS is priced at $43.81, while HAL trades at $42.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NGS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas HAL's P/E ratio is 23.07. In terms of profitability, NGS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HAL's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NGS is less volatile compared to HAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NGS.Check HAL's competition here
NGS vs TS Comparison May 2026
NGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NGS stands at 533.3M. In comparison, TS has a market cap of 33.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NGS is priced at $43.81, while TS trades at $62.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NGS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas TS's P/E ratio is 16.26. In terms of profitability, NGS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NGS is more volatile compared to TS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NGS.Check TS's competition here
NGS vs FTI Comparison May 2026
NGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NGS stands at 533.3M. In comparison, FTI has a market cap of 28.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NGS is priced at $43.81, while FTI trades at $72.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NGS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas FTI's P/E ratio is 27.30. In terms of profitability, NGS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FTI's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, NGS is less volatile compared to FTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NGS.Check FTI's competition here
NGS vs WFRD Comparison May 2026
NGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NGS stands at 533.3M. In comparison, WFRD has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NGS is priced at $43.81, while WFRD trades at $109.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NGS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas WFRD's P/E ratio is 17.03. In terms of profitability, NGS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to WFRD's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, NGS is less volatile compared to WFRD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NGS.Check WFRD's competition here
NGS vs NOV Comparison May 2026
NGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NGS stands at 533.3M. In comparison, NOV has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NGS is priced at $43.81, while NOV trades at $21.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NGS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas NOV's P/E ratio is 81.46. In terms of profitability, NGS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NOV's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NGS is less volatile compared to NOV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NGS.Check NOV's competition here
NGS vs VAL Comparison May 2026
NGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NGS stands at 533.3M. In comparison, VAL has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NGS is priced at $43.81, while VAL trades at $113.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NGS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas VAL's P/E ratio is 7.44. In terms of profitability, NGS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VAL's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, NGS is less volatile compared to VAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NGS.Check VAL's competition here
NGS vs AROC Comparison May 2026
NGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NGS stands at 533.3M. In comparison, AROC has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NGS is priced at $43.81, while AROC trades at $38.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NGS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas AROC's P/E ratio is 20.35. In terms of profitability, NGS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AROC's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, NGS is less volatile compared to AROC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NGS.Check AROC's competition here
NGS vs KGS Comparison May 2026
NGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NGS stands at 533.3M. In comparison, KGS has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NGS is priced at $43.81, while KGS trades at $75.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NGS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas KGS's P/E ratio is 96.67. In terms of profitability, NGS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KGS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NGS is less volatile compared to KGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NGS.Check KGS's competition here
NGS vs SEI Comparison May 2026
NGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NGS stands at 533.3M. In comparison, SEI has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NGS is priced at $43.81, while SEI trades at $70.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NGS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas SEI's P/E ratio is 93.61. In terms of profitability, NGS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SEI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NGS is less volatile compared to SEI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NGS.Check SEI's competition here
NGS vs LBRT Comparison May 2026
NGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NGS stands at 533.3M. In comparison, LBRT has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NGS is priced at $43.81, while LBRT trades at $33.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NGS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas LBRT's P/E ratio is 36.20. In terms of profitability, NGS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LBRT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NGS is less volatile compared to LBRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NGS.Check LBRT's competition here
NGS vs LB Comparison May 2026
NGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NGS stands at 533.3M. In comparison, LB has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NGS is priced at $43.81, while LB trades at $73.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NGS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas LB's P/E ratio is 71.89. In terms of profitability, NGS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LB's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NGS is less volatile compared to LB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NGS.Check LB's competition here
NGS vs CHX Comparison May 2026
NGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NGS stands at 533.3M. In comparison, CHX has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NGS is priced at $43.81, while CHX trades at $25.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NGS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas CHX's P/E ratio is 17.09. In terms of profitability, NGS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CHX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NGS is more volatile compared to CHX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NGS.Check CHX's competition here
NGS vs TDW Comparison May 2026
NGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NGS stands at 533.3M. In comparison, TDW has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NGS is priced at $43.81, while TDW trades at $84.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NGS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas TDW's P/E ratio is 13.88. In terms of profitability, NGS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TDW's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, NGS is less volatile compared to TDW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NGS.Check TDW's competition here
NGS vs WHD Comparison May 2026
NGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NGS stands at 533.3M. In comparison, WHD has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, NGS is priced at $43.81, while WHD trades at $59.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NGS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas WHD's P/E ratio is 53.23. In terms of profitability, NGS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to WHD's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NGS is less volatile compared to WHD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NGS.Check WHD's competition here
NGS vs OII Comparison May 2026
NGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NGS stands at 533.3M. In comparison, OII has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NGS is priced at $43.81, while OII trades at $38.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NGS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas OII's P/E ratio is 11.26. In terms of profitability, NGS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to OII's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, NGS is less volatile compared to OII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NGS.Check OII's competition here
NGS vs USAC Comparison May 2026
NGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NGS stands at 533.3M. In comparison, USAC has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NGS is priced at $43.81, while USAC trades at $30.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NGS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas USAC's P/E ratio is 30.28. In terms of profitability, NGS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to USAC's ROE of +6.51%. Regarding short-term risk, NGS is more volatile compared to USAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NGS.Check USAC's competition here
NGS vs EFXT Comparison May 2026
NGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NGS stands at 533.3M. In comparison, EFXT has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NGS is priced at $43.81, while EFXT trades at $28.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NGS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas EFXT's P/E ratio is 40.99. In terms of profitability, NGS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EFXT's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NGS is more volatile compared to EFXT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NGS.Check EFXT's competition here
NGS vs CAM Comparison May 2026
NGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NGS stands at 533.3M. In comparison, CAM has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NGS is priced at $43.81, while CAM trades at $66.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NGS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas CAM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NGS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CAM's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NGS is more volatile compared to CAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NGS.Check CAM's competition here
NGS vs TDW-WT Comparison May 2026
NGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NGS stands at 533.3M. In comparison, TDW-WT has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NGS is priced at $43.81, while TDW-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NGS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas TDW-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NGS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TDW-WT's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, NGS is more volatile compared to TDW-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NGS.Check TDW-WT's competition here
NGS vs NESR Comparison May 2026
NGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NGS stands at 533.3M. In comparison, NESR has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NGS is priced at $43.81, while NESR trades at $25.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NGS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas NESR's P/E ratio is 39.78. In terms of profitability, NGS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NESR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NGS is less volatile compared to NESR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NGS.Check NESR's competition here
NGS vs FLOC Comparison May 2026
NGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NGS stands at 533.3M. In comparison, FLOC has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NGS is priced at $43.81, while FLOC trades at $27.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NGS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas FLOC's P/E ratio is 22.20. In terms of profitability, NGS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FLOC's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NGS and FLOC have similar daily volatility (3.14).Check FLOC's competition here
NGS vs NEX Comparison May 2026
NGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NGS stands at 533.3M. In comparison, NEX has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NGS is priced at $43.81, while NEX trades at $10.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NGS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas NEX's P/E ratio is 3.94. In terms of profitability, NGS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NEX's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, NGS is less volatile compared to NEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NGS.Check NEX's competition here
NGS vs AESI Comparison May 2026
NGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NGS stands at 533.3M. In comparison, AESI has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NGS is priced at $43.81, while AESI trades at $19.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NGS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas AESI's P/E ratio is -23.57. In terms of profitability, NGS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AESI's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NGS is less volatile compared to AESI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NGS.Check AESI's competition here
NGS vs PUMP Comparison May 2026
NGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NGS stands at 533.3M. In comparison, PUMP has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NGS is priced at $43.81, while PUMP trades at $18.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NGS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas PUMP's P/E ratio is -158.59. In terms of profitability, NGS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PUMP's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NGS is less volatile compared to PUMP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NGS.Check PUMP's competition here
NGS vs INVX Comparison May 2026
NGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NGS stands at 533.3M. In comparison, INVX has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NGS is priced at $43.81, while INVX trades at $29.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NGS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas INVX's P/E ratio is 37.32. In terms of profitability, NGS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to INVX's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NGS is less volatile compared to INVX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NGS.Check INVX's competition here
NGS vs XPRO Comparison May 2026
NGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NGS stands at 533.3M. In comparison, XPRO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NGS is priced at $43.81, while XPRO trades at $16.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NGS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas XPRO's P/E ratio is 49.50. In terms of profitability, NGS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to XPRO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NGS is less volatile compared to XPRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NGS.Check XPRO's competition here
NGS vs DNOW Comparison May 2026
NGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NGS stands at 533.3M. In comparison, DNOW has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NGS is priced at $43.81, while DNOW trades at $13.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NGS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas DNOW's P/E ratio is -11.04. In terms of profitability, NGS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DNOW's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NGS is more volatile compared to DNOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NGS.Check DNOW's competition here
NGS vs RES Comparison May 2026
NGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NGS stands at 533.3M. In comparison, RES has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NGS is priced at $43.81, while RES trades at $7.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NGS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas RES's P/E ratio is 76.83. In terms of profitability, NGS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RES's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NGS is less volatile compared to RES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NGS.Check RES's competition here
NGS vs VAL-WT Comparison May 2026
NGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NGS stands at 533.3M. In comparison, VAL-WT has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NGS is priced at $43.81, while VAL-WT trades at $25.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NGS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas VAL-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NGS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VAL-WT's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, NGS is less volatile compared to VAL-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NGS.Check VAL-WT's competition here
NGS vs HLX Comparison May 2026
NGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NGS stands at 533.3M. In comparison, HLX has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NGS is priced at $43.81, while HLX trades at $10.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NGS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas HLX's P/E ratio is 100.45. In terms of profitability, NGS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HLX's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NGS is less volatile compared to HLX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NGS.Check HLX's competition here
NGS vs TTI Comparison May 2026
NGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NGS stands at 533.3M. In comparison, TTI has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NGS is priced at $43.81, while TTI trades at $10.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NGS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas TTI's P/E ratio is 175.33. In terms of profitability, NGS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TTI's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NGS is less volatile compared to TTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NGS.Check TTI's competition here
NGS vs ACDC Comparison May 2026
NGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NGS stands at 533.3M. In comparison, ACDC has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NGS is priced at $43.81, while ACDC trades at $7.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NGS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas ACDC's P/E ratio is -2.83. In terms of profitability, NGS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ACDC's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, NGS is less volatile compared to ACDC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NGS.Check ACDC's competition here
NGS vs NPKI Comparison May 2026
NGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NGS stands at 533.3M. In comparison, NPKI has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NGS is priced at $43.81, while NPKI trades at $15.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NGS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas NPKI's P/E ratio is 36.36. In terms of profitability, NGS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NPKI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NGS is more volatile compared to NPKI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NGS.Check NPKI's competition here
NGS vs VTOL Comparison May 2026
NGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NGS stands at 533.3M. In comparison, VTOL has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NGS is priced at $43.81, while VTOL trades at $42.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NGS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas VTOL's P/E ratio is 10.98. In terms of profitability, NGS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VTOL's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NGS is less volatile compared to VTOL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NGS.Check VTOL's competition here
NGS vs SLCA Comparison May 2026
NGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NGS stands at 533.3M. In comparison, SLCA has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NGS is priced at $43.81, while SLCA trades at $15.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NGS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas SLCA's P/E ratio is 10.54. In terms of profitability, NGS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SLCA's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NGS is more volatile compared to SLCA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NGS.Check SLCA's competition here
NGS vs PFHC Comparison May 2026
NGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NGS stands at 533.3M. In comparison, PFHC has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NGS is priced at $43.81, while PFHC trades at $22.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NGS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas PFHC's P/E ratio is 105.14. In terms of profitability, NGS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PFHC's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, NGS is less volatile compared to PFHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NGS.Check PFHC's competition here
NGS vs MRC Comparison May 2026
NGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NGS stands at 533.3M. In comparison, MRC has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NGS is priced at $43.81, while MRC trades at $13.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NGS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas MRC's P/E ratio is 59.91. In terms of profitability, NGS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MRC's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NGS is less volatile compared to MRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NGS.Check MRC's competition here
NGS vs HMH Comparison May 2026
NGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NGS stands at 533.3M. In comparison, HMH has a market cap of 969.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NGS is priced at $43.81, while HMH trades at $21.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NGS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas HMH's P/E ratio is 166.85. In terms of profitability, NGS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HMH's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NGS is more volatile compared to HMH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NGS.Check HMH's competition here
NGS vs NESRW Comparison May 2026
NGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NGS stands at 533.3M. In comparison, NESRW has a market cap of 709.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NGS is priced at $43.81, while NESRW trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NGS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas NESRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NGS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NESRW's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NGS is less volatile compared to NESRW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NGS.Check NESRW's competition here
NGS vs FET Comparison May 2026
NGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NGS stands at 533.3M. In comparison, FET has a market cap of 636.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NGS is priced at $43.81, while FET trades at $57.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NGS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas FET's P/E ratio is -110.45. In terms of profitability, NGS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FET's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NGS is less volatile compared to FET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NGS.Check FET's competition here
NGS vs NR Comparison May 2026
NGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NGS stands at 533.3M. In comparison, NR has a market cap of 627.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NGS is priced at $43.81, while NR trades at $7.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NGS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas NR's P/E ratio is 19.08. In terms of profitability, NGS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NGS is less volatile compared to NR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NGS.Check NR's competition here
NGS vs CLB Comparison May 2026
NGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NGS stands at 533.3M. In comparison, CLB has a market cap of 602.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NGS is priced at $43.81, while CLB trades at $13.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NGS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas CLB's P/E ratio is 21.44. In terms of profitability, NGS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CLB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NGS is less volatile compared to CLB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NGS.Check CLB's competition here
NGS vs FTK Comparison May 2026
NGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NGS stands at 533.3M. In comparison, FTK has a market cap of 590.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NGS is priced at $43.81, while FTK trades at $19.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NGS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas FTK's P/E ratio is 24.81. In terms of profitability, NGS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FTK's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, NGS is less volatile compared to FTK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NGS.Check FTK's competition here
NGS vs OIS Comparison May 2026
NGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NGS stands at 533.3M. In comparison, OIS has a market cap of 542M. Regarding current trading prices, NGS is priced at $43.81, while OIS trades at $9.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NGS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas OIS's P/E ratio is -4.76. In terms of profitability, NGS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to OIS's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NGS is less volatile compared to OIS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NGS.Check OIS's competition here
NGS vs DRQ Comparison May 2026
NGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NGS stands at 533.3M. In comparison, DRQ has a market cap of 530.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NGS is priced at $43.81, while DRQ trades at $15.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NGS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas DRQ's P/E ratio is -19.76. In terms of profitability, NGS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DRQ's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NGS is less volatile compared to DRQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NGS.Check DRQ's competition here
NGS vs SOI Comparison May 2026
NGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NGS stands at 533.3M. In comparison, SOI has a market cap of 498.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NGS is priced at $43.81, while SOI trades at $11.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NGS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas SOI's P/E ratio is 17.15. In terms of profitability, NGS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SOI's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, NGS is less volatile compared to SOI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NGS.Check SOI's competition here
NGS vs NINE Comparison May 2026
NGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NGS stands at 533.3M. In comparison, NINE has a market cap of 445.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NGS is priced at $43.81, while NINE trades at $10.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NGS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas NINE's P/E ratio is -8.23. In terms of profitability, NGS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NINE's ROE of -1.57%. Regarding short-term risk, NGS is less volatile compared to NINE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NGS.Check NINE's competition here
NGS vs NOA Comparison May 2026
NGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NGS stands at 533.3M. In comparison, NOA has a market cap of 437.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NGS is priced at $43.81, while NOA trades at $15.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NGS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas NOA's P/E ratio is 18.72. In terms of profitability, NGS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NOA's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NGS is less volatile compared to NOA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NGS.Check NOA's competition here
NGS vs RNGR Comparison May 2026
NGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NGS stands at 533.3M. In comparison, RNGR has a market cap of 390.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NGS is priced at $43.81, while RNGR trades at $16.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NGS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas RNGR's P/E ratio is 26.10. In terms of profitability, NGS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RNGR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NGS is less volatile compared to RNGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NGS.Check RNGR's competition here
NGS vs CCLP Comparison May 2026
NGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NGS stands at 533.3M. In comparison, CCLP has a market cap of 344.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NGS is priced at $43.81, while CCLP trades at $2.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NGS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas CCLP's P/E ratio is -34.57. In terms of profitability, NGS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CCLP's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, NGS is less volatile compared to CCLP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NGS.Check CCLP's competition here
NGS vs SND Comparison May 2026
NGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NGS stands at 533.3M. In comparison, SND has a market cap of 204.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NGS is priced at $43.81, while SND trades at $4.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NGS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas SND's P/E ratio is 8.64. In terms of profitability, NGS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SND's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NGS is less volatile compared to SND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NGS.Check SND's competition here
NGS vs OMSE Comparison May 2026
NGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NGS stands at 533.3M. In comparison, OMSE has a market cap of 194M. Regarding current trading prices, NGS is priced at $43.81, while OMSE trades at $4.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NGS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas OMSE's P/E ratio is 6.44. In terms of profitability, NGS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to OMSE's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, NGS is less volatile compared to OMSE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NGS.Check OMSE's competition here
NGS vs BOOM Comparison May 2026
NGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NGS stands at 533.3M. In comparison, BOOM has a market cap of 141.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NGS is priced at $43.81, while BOOM trades at $7.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NGS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas BOOM's P/E ratio is -5.41. In terms of profitability, NGS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BOOM's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NGS is less volatile compared to BOOM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NGS.Check BOOM's competition here
NGS vs DWSN Comparison May 2026
NGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NGS stands at 533.3M. In comparison, DWSN has a market cap of 121.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NGS is priced at $43.81, while DWSN trades at $4.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NGS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas DWSN's P/E ratio is -65.17. In terms of profitability, NGS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DWSN's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, NGS is less volatile compared to DWSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NGS.Check DWSN's competition here
NGS vs PFIE Comparison May 2026
NGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NGS stands at 533.3M. In comparison, PFIE has a market cap of 117.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NGS is priced at $43.81, while PFIE trades at $2.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NGS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas PFIE's P/E ratio is 13.37. In terms of profitability, NGS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PFIE's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NGS is more volatile compared to PFIE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NGS.Check PFIE's competition here
NGS vs NCSM Comparison May 2026
NGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NGS stands at 533.3M. In comparison, NCSM has a market cap of 112M. Regarding current trading prices, NGS is priced at $43.81, while NCSM trades at $43.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NGS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas NCSM's P/E ratio is 6.10. In terms of profitability, NGS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NCSM's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NGS is less volatile compared to NCSM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NGS.Check NCSM's competition here
NGS vs DTI Comparison May 2026
NGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NGS stands at 533.3M. In comparison, DTI has a market cap of 105.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NGS is priced at $43.81, while DTI trades at $3.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NGS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas DTI's P/E ratio is -30.10. In terms of profitability, NGS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DTI's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NGS is more volatile compared to DTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NGS.Check DTI's competition here
NGS vs GEOS Comparison May 2026
NGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NGS stands at 533.3M. In comparison, GEOS has a market cap of 97.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NGS is priced at $43.81, while GEOS trades at $7.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NGS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas GEOS's P/E ratio is -3.31. In terms of profitability, NGS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GEOS's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, NGS is less volatile compared to GEOS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NGS.Check GEOS's competition here
NGS vs LSE Comparison May 2026
NGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NGS stands at 533.3M. In comparison, LSE has a market cap of 78.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NGS is priced at $43.81, while LSE trades at $4.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NGS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas LSE's P/E ratio is 57.75. In terms of profitability, NGS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LSE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NGS is less volatile compared to LSE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NGS.Check LSE's competition here
NGS vs KLXE Comparison May 2026
NGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NGS stands at 533.3M. In comparison, KLXE has a market cap of 78.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NGS is priced at $43.81, while KLXE trades at $3.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NGS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas KLXE's P/E ratio is -1.05. In terms of profitability, NGS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KLXE's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NGS is less volatile compared to KLXE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NGS.Check KLXE's competition here
NGS vs SDPI Comparison May 2026
NGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NGS stands at 533.3M. In comparison, SDPI has a market cap of 30.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NGS is priced at $43.81, while SDPI trades at $1.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NGS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas SDPI's P/E ratio is 7.21. In terms of profitability, NGS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SDPI's ROE of +0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, NGS is more volatile compared to SDPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NGS.Check SDPI's competition here
NGS vs RCON Comparison May 2026
NGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NGS stands at 533.3M. In comparison, RCON has a market cap of 19.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NGS is priced at $43.81, while RCON trades at $0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NGS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas RCON's P/E ratio is -1.56. In terms of profitability, NGS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RCON's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NGS is less volatile compared to RCON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NGS.Check RCON's competition here
NGS vs STAK Comparison May 2026
NGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NGS stands at 533.3M. In comparison, STAK has a market cap of 12M. Regarding current trading prices, NGS is priced at $43.81, while STAK trades at $1.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NGS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas STAK's P/E ratio is -2.11. In terms of profitability, NGS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to STAK's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, NGS is less volatile compared to STAK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NGS.Check STAK's competition here
NGS vs ENSV Comparison May 2026
NGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NGS stands at 533.3M. In comparison, ENSV has a market cap of 29.1K. Regarding current trading prices, NGS is priced at $43.81, while ENSV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NGS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas ENSV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NGS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ENSV's ROE of -28.53%. Regarding short-term risk, NGS is more volatile compared to ENSV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NGS.Check ENSV's competition here
NGS vs CELP Comparison May 2026
NGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NGS stands at 533.3M. In comparison, CELP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NGS is priced at $43.81, while CELP trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NGS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas CELP's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, NGS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CELP's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NGS is less volatile compared to CELP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NGS.Check CELP's competition here
NGS vs APLP Comparison May 2026
NGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NGS stands at 533.3M. In comparison, APLP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NGS is priced at $43.81, while APLP trades at $15.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NGS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas APLP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NGS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to APLP's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, NGS is more volatile compared to APLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NGS.Check APLP's competition here
NGS vs IO Comparison May 2026
NGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NGS stands at 533.3M. In comparison, IO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NGS is priced at $43.81, while IO trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NGS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas IO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NGS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to IO's ROE of +0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, NGS is less volatile compared to IO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NGS.Check IO's competition here
NGS vs EXTN Comparison May 2026
NGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NGS stands at 533.3M. In comparison, EXTN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NGS is priced at $43.81, while EXTN trades at $4.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NGS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas EXTN's P/E ratio is -1.35. In terms of profitability, NGS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EXTN's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, NGS is less volatile compared to EXTN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NGS.Check EXTN's competition here
NGS vs TDW-WTB Comparison May 2026
NGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NGS stands at 533.3M. In comparison, TDW-WTB has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NGS is priced at $43.81, while TDW-WTB trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NGS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas TDW-WTB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NGS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TDW-WTB's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, NGS is less volatile compared to TDW-WTB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NGS.Check TDW-WTB's competition here
NGS vs TDW-WTA Comparison May 2026
NGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NGS stands at 533.3M. In comparison, TDW-WTA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NGS is priced at $43.81, while TDW-WTA trades at $2.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NGS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas TDW-WTA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NGS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TDW-WTA's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, NGS is less volatile compared to TDW-WTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NGS.Check TDW-WTA's competition here
NGS vs ACDCW Comparison May 2026
NGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NGS stands at 533.3M. In comparison, ACDCW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NGS is priced at $43.81, while ACDCW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NGS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas ACDCW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NGS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ACDCW's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, NGS is less volatile compared to ACDCW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NGS.Check ACDCW's competition here
NGS vs GLF Comparison May 2026
NGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NGS stands at 533.3M. In comparison, GLF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NGS is priced at $43.81, while GLF trades at $28.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NGS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas GLF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NGS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GLF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NGS is less volatile compared to GLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NGS.Check GLF's competition here
NGS vs CETC Comparison May 2026
NGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NGS stands at 533.3M. In comparison, CETC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NGS is priced at $43.81, while CETC trades at $4.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NGS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas CETC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NGS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CETC's ROE of -1.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NGS is less volatile compared to CETC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NGS.Check CETC's competition here
NGS vs VLI Comparison May 2026
NGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NGS stands at 533.3M. In comparison, VLI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NGS is priced at $43.81, while VLI trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NGS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas VLI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NGS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VLI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NGS is less volatile compared to VLI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NGS.Check VLI's competition here
NGS vs USWS Comparison May 2026
NGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NGS stands at 533.3M. In comparison, USWS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NGS is priced at $43.81, while USWS trades at $7.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NGS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas USWS's P/E ratio is -3.94. In terms of profitability, NGS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to USWS's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NGS is less volatile compared to USWS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NGS.Check USWS's competition here
NGS vs USWSW Comparison May 2026
NGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NGS stands at 533.3M. In comparison, USWSW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NGS is priced at $43.81, while USWSW trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NGS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas USWSW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NGS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to USWSW's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NGS is less volatile compared to USWSW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NGS.Check USWSW's competition here
NGS vs FTSI Comparison May 2026
NGS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NGS stands at 533.3M. In comparison, FTSI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NGS is priced at $43.81, while FTSI trades at $26.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NGS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.63, whereas FTSI's P/E ratio is 4.67. In terms of profitability, NGS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FTSI's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NGS is less volatile compared to FTSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NGS.Check FTSI's competition here