RPC, Inc.
RPC, Inc. (RES) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (RES) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Oil & Gas Equipment & Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RES | $7.06 | +2.02% | 1.6B | 78.33 | $0.09 | +2.26% |
| SLB | $57.15 | +3.21% | 85.5B | 25.19 | $2.27 | +2.02% |
| BKR | $66.21 | +3.26% | 65.7B | 21.15 | $3.13 | +1.40% |
| HAL | $42.78 | +2.45% | 35.7B | 23.63 | $1.81 | +1.59% |
| TS | $62.08 | +0.50% | 33.3B | 16.34 | $3.80 | +2.73% |
| FTI | $73.46 | +3.06% | 29.3B | 28.14 | $2.61 | +0.27% |
| WFRD | $111.42 | +2.38% | 8B | 17.44 | $6.39 | +0.95% |
| VAL | $113.42 | +7.58% | 7.9B | 8.02 | $14.15 | N/A |
| NOV | $21.17 | +3.93% | 7.6B | 84.70 | $0.25 | +2.49% |
| AROC | $38.62 | +3.18% | 6.8B | 20.99 | $1.84 | +2.23% |
Stock Comparison
RES vs SLB Comparison May 2026
RES plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RES stands at 1.6B. In comparison, SLB has a market cap of 85.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RES is priced at $7.06, while SLB trades at $57.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RES currently has a P/E ratio of 78.33, whereas SLB's P/E ratio is 25.19. In terms of profitability, RES's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SLB's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RES is more volatile compared to SLB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RES.Check SLB's competition here
RES vs BKR Comparison May 2026
RES plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RES stands at 1.6B. In comparison, BKR has a market cap of 65.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RES is priced at $7.06, while BKR trades at $66.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RES currently has a P/E ratio of 78.33, whereas BKR's P/E ratio is 21.15. In terms of profitability, RES's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BKR's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RES is more volatile compared to BKR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RES.Check BKR's competition here
RES vs HAL Comparison May 2026
RES plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RES stands at 1.6B. In comparison, HAL has a market cap of 35.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RES is priced at $7.06, while HAL trades at $42.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RES currently has a P/E ratio of 78.33, whereas HAL's P/E ratio is 23.63. In terms of profitability, RES's ROE is +0.02%, compared to HAL's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RES is more volatile compared to HAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RES.Check HAL's competition here
RES vs TS Comparison May 2026
RES plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RES stands at 1.6B. In comparison, TS has a market cap of 33.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RES is priced at $7.06, while TS trades at $62.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RES currently has a P/E ratio of 78.33, whereas TS's P/E ratio is 16.34. In terms of profitability, RES's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RES is more volatile compared to TS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RES.Check TS's competition here
RES vs FTI Comparison May 2026
RES plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RES stands at 1.6B. In comparison, FTI has a market cap of 29.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RES is priced at $7.06, while FTI trades at $73.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RES currently has a P/E ratio of 78.33, whereas FTI's P/E ratio is 28.14. In terms of profitability, RES's ROE is +0.02%, compared to FTI's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, RES is more volatile compared to FTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RES.Check FTI's competition here
RES vs WFRD Comparison May 2026
RES plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RES stands at 1.6B. In comparison, WFRD has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, RES is priced at $7.06, while WFRD trades at $111.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RES currently has a P/E ratio of 78.33, whereas WFRD's P/E ratio is 17.44. In terms of profitability, RES's ROE is +0.02%, compared to WFRD's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, RES is more volatile compared to WFRD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RES.Check WFRD's competition here
RES vs VAL Comparison May 2026
RES plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RES stands at 1.6B. In comparison, VAL has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RES is priced at $7.06, while VAL trades at $113.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RES currently has a P/E ratio of 78.33, whereas VAL's P/E ratio is 8.02. In terms of profitability, RES's ROE is +0.02%, compared to VAL's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, RES is less volatile compared to VAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RES.Check VAL's competition here
RES vs NOV Comparison May 2026
RES plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RES stands at 1.6B. In comparison, NOV has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RES is priced at $7.06, while NOV trades at $21.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RES currently has a P/E ratio of 78.33, whereas NOV's P/E ratio is 84.70. In terms of profitability, RES's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NOV's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RES and NOV have similar daily volatility (4.58).Check NOV's competition here
RES vs AROC Comparison May 2026
RES plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RES stands at 1.6B. In comparison, AROC has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RES is priced at $7.06, while AROC trades at $38.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RES currently has a P/E ratio of 78.33, whereas AROC's P/E ratio is 20.99. In terms of profitability, RES's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AROC's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, RES is more volatile compared to AROC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RES.Check AROC's competition here
RES vs KGS Comparison May 2026
RES plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RES stands at 1.6B. In comparison, KGS has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RES is priced at $7.06, while KGS trades at $75.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RES currently has a P/E ratio of 78.33, whereas KGS's P/E ratio is 99.66. In terms of profitability, RES's ROE is +0.02%, compared to KGS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RES is more volatile compared to KGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RES.Check KGS's competition here
RES vs LB Comparison May 2026
RES plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RES stands at 1.6B. In comparison, LB has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RES is priced at $7.06, while LB trades at $72.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RES currently has a P/E ratio of 78.33, whereas LB's P/E ratio is 74.60. In terms of profitability, RES's ROE is +0.02%, compared to LB's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RES is less volatile compared to LB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RES.Check LB's competition here
RES vs LBRT Comparison May 2026
RES plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RES stands at 1.6B. In comparison, LBRT has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RES is priced at $7.06, while LBRT trades at $33.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RES currently has a P/E ratio of 78.33, whereas LBRT's P/E ratio is 36.33. In terms of profitability, RES's ROE is +0.02%, compared to LBRT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RES is more volatile compared to LBRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RES.Check LBRT's competition here
RES vs SEI Comparison May 2026
RES plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RES stands at 1.6B. In comparison, SEI has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RES is priced at $7.06, while SEI trades at $72.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RES currently has a P/E ratio of 78.33, whereas SEI's P/E ratio is 85.85. In terms of profitability, RES's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SEI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RES is less volatile compared to SEI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RES.Check SEI's competition here
RES vs CHX Comparison May 2026
RES plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RES stands at 1.6B. In comparison, CHX has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RES is priced at $7.06, while CHX trades at $25.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RES currently has a P/E ratio of 78.33, whereas CHX's P/E ratio is 17.09. In terms of profitability, RES's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CHX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RES is more volatile compared to CHX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RES.Check CHX's competition here
RES vs TDW Comparison May 2026
RES plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RES stands at 1.6B. In comparison, TDW has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RES is priced at $7.06, while TDW trades at $85.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RES currently has a P/E ratio of 78.33, whereas TDW's P/E ratio is 14.38. In terms of profitability, RES's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TDW's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, RES is less volatile compared to TDW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RES.Check TDW's competition here
RES vs WHD Comparison May 2026
RES plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RES stands at 1.6B. In comparison, WHD has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RES is priced at $7.06, while WHD trades at $60.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RES currently has a P/E ratio of 78.33, whereas WHD's P/E ratio is 56.44. In terms of profitability, RES's ROE is +0.02%, compared to WHD's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RES is less volatile compared to WHD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RES.Check WHD's competition here
RES vs OII Comparison May 2026
RES plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RES stands at 1.6B. In comparison, OII has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RES is priced at $7.06, while OII trades at $38.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RES currently has a P/E ratio of 78.33, whereas OII's P/E ratio is 11.46. In terms of profitability, RES's ROE is +0.02%, compared to OII's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, RES is more volatile compared to OII. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RES.Check OII's competition here
RES vs USAC Comparison May 2026
RES plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RES stands at 1.6B. In comparison, USAC has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RES is priced at $7.06, while USAC trades at $30.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RES currently has a P/E ratio of 78.33, whereas USAC's P/E ratio is 30.80. In terms of profitability, RES's ROE is +0.02%, compared to USAC's ROE of +6.51%. Regarding short-term risk, RES is less volatile compared to USAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RES.Check USAC's competition here
RES vs EFXT Comparison May 2026
RES plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RES stands at 1.6B. In comparison, EFXT has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RES is priced at $7.06, while EFXT trades at $28.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RES currently has a P/E ratio of 78.33, whereas EFXT's P/E ratio is 41.38. In terms of profitability, RES's ROE is +0.02%, compared to EFXT's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RES is more volatile compared to EFXT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RES.Check EFXT's competition here
RES vs CAM Comparison May 2026
RES plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RES stands at 1.6B. In comparison, CAM has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, RES is priced at $7.06, while CAM trades at $66.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RES currently has a P/E ratio of 78.33, whereas CAM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RES's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CAM's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RES is more volatile compared to CAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RES.Check CAM's competition here
RES vs TDW-WT Comparison May 2026
RES plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RES stands at 1.6B. In comparison, TDW-WT has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RES is priced at $7.06, while TDW-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RES currently has a P/E ratio of 78.33, whereas TDW-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RES's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TDW-WT's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, RES is more volatile compared to TDW-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RES.Check TDW-WT's competition here
RES vs NESR Comparison May 2026
RES plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RES stands at 1.6B. In comparison, NESR has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RES is priced at $7.06, while NESR trades at $25.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RES currently has a P/E ratio of 78.33, whereas NESR's P/E ratio is 40.61. In terms of profitability, RES's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NESR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RES is more volatile compared to NESR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RES.Check NESR's competition here
RES vs FLOC Comparison May 2026
RES plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RES stands at 1.6B. In comparison, FLOC has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RES is priced at $7.06, while FLOC trades at $27.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RES currently has a P/E ratio of 78.33, whereas FLOC's P/E ratio is 22.35. In terms of profitability, RES's ROE is +0.02%, compared to FLOC's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, RES is more volatile compared to FLOC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RES.Check FLOC's competition here
RES vs EROK Comparison May 2026
RES plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RES stands at 1.6B. In comparison, EROK has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RES is priced at $7.06, while EROK trades at $23.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RES currently has a P/E ratio of 78.33, whereas EROK's P/E ratio is -7.88. In terms of profitability, RES's ROE is +0.02%, compared to EROK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RES is less volatile compared to EROK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RES.Check EROK's competition here
RES vs AESI Comparison May 2026
RES plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RES stands at 1.6B. In comparison, AESI has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RES is priced at $7.06, while AESI trades at $19.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RES currently has a P/E ratio of 78.33, whereas AESI's P/E ratio is -24.31. In terms of profitability, RES's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AESI's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RES is less volatile compared to AESI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RES.Check AESI's competition here
RES vs NEX Comparison May 2026
RES plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RES stands at 1.6B. In comparison, NEX has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RES is priced at $7.06, while NEX trades at $10.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RES currently has a P/E ratio of 78.33, whereas NEX's P/E ratio is 3.94. In terms of profitability, RES's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NEX's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, RES is more volatile compared to NEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RES.Check NEX's competition here
RES vs PUMP Comparison May 2026
RES plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RES stands at 1.6B. In comparison, PUMP has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RES is priced at $7.06, while PUMP trades at $18.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RES currently has a P/E ratio of 78.33, whereas PUMP's P/E ratio is -164.00. In terms of profitability, RES's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PUMP's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RES is less volatile compared to PUMP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RES.Check PUMP's competition here
RES vs INVX Comparison May 2026
RES plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RES stands at 1.6B. In comparison, INVX has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RES is priced at $7.06, while INVX trades at $30.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RES currently has a P/E ratio of 78.33, whereas INVX's P/E ratio is 40.38. In terms of profitability, RES's ROE is +0.02%, compared to INVX's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RES is less volatile compared to INVX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RES.Check INVX's competition here
RES vs XPRO Comparison May 2026
RES plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RES stands at 1.6B. In comparison, XPRO has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RES is priced at $7.06, while XPRO trades at $16.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RES currently has a P/E ratio of 78.33, whereas XPRO's P/E ratio is 51.64. In terms of profitability, RES's ROE is +0.02%, compared to XPRO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RES is less volatile compared to XPRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RES.Check XPRO's competition here
RES vs VAL-WT Comparison May 2026
RES plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RES stands at 1.6B. In comparison, VAL-WT has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RES is priced at $7.06, while VAL-WT trades at $25.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RES currently has a P/E ratio of 78.33, whereas VAL-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RES's ROE is +0.02%, compared to VAL-WT's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, RES is less volatile compared to VAL-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RES.Check VAL-WT's competition here
RES vs HLX Comparison May 2026
RES plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RES stands at 1.6B. In comparison, HLX has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RES is priced at $7.06, while HLX trades at $10.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RES currently has a P/E ratio of 78.33, whereas HLX's P/E ratio is 104.65. In terms of profitability, RES's ROE is +0.02%, compared to HLX's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RES is less volatile compared to HLX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RES.Check HLX's competition here
RES vs DNOW Comparison May 2026
RES plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RES stands at 1.6B. In comparison, DNOW has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RES is priced at $7.06, while DNOW trades at $13.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RES currently has a P/E ratio of 78.33, whereas DNOW's P/E ratio is -10.96. In terms of profitability, RES's ROE is +0.02%, compared to DNOW's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RES is more volatile compared to DNOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RES.Check DNOW's competition here
RES vs TTI Comparison May 2026
RES plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RES stands at 1.6B. In comparison, TTI has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RES is priced at $7.06, while TTI trades at $10.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RES currently has a P/E ratio of 78.33, whereas TTI's P/E ratio is 174.58. In terms of profitability, RES's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TTI's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RES is more volatile compared to TTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RES.Check TTI's competition here
RES vs ACDC Comparison May 2026
RES plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RES stands at 1.6B. In comparison, ACDC has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RES is priced at $7.06, while ACDC trades at $7.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RES currently has a P/E ratio of 78.33, whereas ACDC's P/E ratio is -3.04. In terms of profitability, RES's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ACDC's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, RES is less volatile compared to ACDC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RES.Check ACDC's competition here
RES vs NPKI Comparison May 2026
RES plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RES stands at 1.6B. In comparison, NPKI has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RES is priced at $7.06, while NPKI trades at $15.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RES currently has a P/E ratio of 78.33, whereas NPKI's P/E ratio is 35.95. In terms of profitability, RES's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NPKI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RES is more volatile compared to NPKI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RES.Check NPKI's competition here
RES vs VTOL Comparison May 2026
RES plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RES stands at 1.6B. In comparison, VTOL has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RES is priced at $7.06, while VTOL trades at $42.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RES currently has a P/E ratio of 78.33, whereas VTOL's P/E ratio is 11.05. In terms of profitability, RES's ROE is +0.02%, compared to VTOL's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RES is more volatile compared to VTOL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RES.Check VTOL's competition here
RES vs SLCA Comparison May 2026
RES plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RES stands at 1.6B. In comparison, SLCA has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RES is priced at $7.06, while SLCA trades at $15.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RES currently has a P/E ratio of 78.33, whereas SLCA's P/E ratio is 10.54. In terms of profitability, RES's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SLCA's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, RES is more volatile compared to SLCA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RES.Check SLCA's competition here
RES vs PFHC Comparison May 2026
RES plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RES stands at 1.6B. In comparison, PFHC has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RES is priced at $7.06, while PFHC trades at $22.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RES currently has a P/E ratio of 78.33, whereas PFHC's P/E ratio is 105.14. In terms of profitability, RES's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PFHC's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, RES is more volatile compared to PFHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RES.Check PFHC's competition here
RES vs MRC Comparison May 2026
RES plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RES stands at 1.6B. In comparison, MRC has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RES is priced at $7.06, while MRC trades at $13.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RES currently has a P/E ratio of 78.33, whereas MRC's P/E ratio is 59.91. In terms of profitability, RES's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MRC's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RES is less volatile compared to MRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RES.Check MRC's competition here
RES vs HMH Comparison May 2026
RES plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RES stands at 1.6B. In comparison, HMH has a market cap of 974.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RES is priced at $7.06, while HMH trades at $21.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RES currently has a P/E ratio of 78.33, whereas HMH's P/E ratio is 167.69. In terms of profitability, RES's ROE is +0.02%, compared to HMH's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RES is more volatile compared to HMH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RES.Check HMH's competition here
RES vs NESRW Comparison May 2026
RES plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RES stands at 1.6B. In comparison, NESRW has a market cap of 709.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RES is priced at $7.06, while NESRW trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RES currently has a P/E ratio of 78.33, whereas NESRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RES's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NESRW's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RES is less volatile compared to NESRW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RES.Check NESRW's competition here
RES vs FET Comparison May 2026
RES plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RES stands at 1.6B. In comparison, FET has a market cap of 655M. Regarding current trading prices, RES is priced at $7.06, while FET trades at $58.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RES currently has a P/E ratio of 78.33, whereas FET's P/E ratio is -113.61. In terms of profitability, RES's ROE is +0.02%, compared to FET's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RES is less volatile compared to FET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RES.Check FET's competition here
RES vs NR Comparison May 2026
RES plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RES stands at 1.6B. In comparison, NR has a market cap of 627.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RES is priced at $7.06, while NR trades at $7.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RES currently has a P/E ratio of 78.33, whereas NR's P/E ratio is 19.08. In terms of profitability, RES's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RES is less volatile compared to NR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RES.Check NR's competition here
RES vs CLB Comparison May 2026
RES plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RES stands at 1.6B. In comparison, CLB has a market cap of 625.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RES is priced at $7.06, while CLB trades at $13.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RES currently has a P/E ratio of 78.33, whereas CLB's P/E ratio is 22.25. In terms of profitability, RES's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CLB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RES is less volatile compared to CLB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RES.Check CLB's competition here
RES vs FTK Comparison May 2026
RES plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RES stands at 1.6B. In comparison, FTK has a market cap of 600.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RES is priced at $7.06, while FTK trades at $19.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RES currently has a P/E ratio of 78.33, whereas FTK's P/E ratio is 25.22. In terms of profitability, RES's ROE is +0.02%, compared to FTK's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, RES is less volatile compared to FTK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RES.Check FTK's competition here
RES vs OIS Comparison May 2026
RES plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RES stands at 1.6B. In comparison, OIS has a market cap of 552.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RES is priced at $7.06, while OIS trades at $9.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RES currently has a P/E ratio of 78.33, whereas OIS's P/E ratio is -4.85. In terms of profitability, RES's ROE is +0.02%, compared to OIS's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, RES is less volatile compared to OIS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RES.Check OIS's competition here
RES vs NGS Comparison May 2026
RES plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RES stands at 1.6B. In comparison, NGS has a market cap of 551.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RES is priced at $7.06, while NGS trades at $43.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RES currently has a P/E ratio of 78.33, whereas NGS's P/E ratio is 25.47. In terms of profitability, RES's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NGS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RES is more volatile compared to NGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RES.Check NGS's competition here
RES vs DRQ Comparison May 2026
RES plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RES stands at 1.6B. In comparison, DRQ has a market cap of 530.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RES is priced at $7.06, while DRQ trades at $15.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RES currently has a P/E ratio of 78.33, whereas DRQ's P/E ratio is -19.76. In terms of profitability, RES's ROE is +0.02%, compared to DRQ's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RES is less volatile compared to DRQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RES.Check DRQ's competition here
RES vs SOI Comparison May 2026
RES plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RES stands at 1.6B. In comparison, SOI has a market cap of 498.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RES is priced at $7.06, while SOI trades at $11.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RES currently has a P/E ratio of 78.33, whereas SOI's P/E ratio is 17.15. In terms of profitability, RES's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SOI's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, RES is more volatile compared to SOI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RES.Check SOI's competition here
RES vs NINE Comparison May 2026
RES plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RES stands at 1.6B. In comparison, NINE has a market cap of 454.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RES is priced at $7.06, while NINE trades at $10.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RES currently has a P/E ratio of 78.33, whereas NINE's P/E ratio is -8.46. In terms of profitability, RES's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NINE's ROE of -1.57%. Regarding short-term risk, RES is more volatile compared to NINE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RES.Check NINE's competition here
RES vs NOA Comparison May 2026
RES plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RES stands at 1.6B. In comparison, NOA has a market cap of 440.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RES is priced at $7.06, while NOA trades at $15.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RES currently has a P/E ratio of 78.33, whereas NOA's P/E ratio is 18.85. In terms of profitability, RES's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NOA's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RES is less volatile compared to NOA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RES.Check NOA's competition here
RES vs RNGR Comparison May 2026
RES plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RES stands at 1.6B. In comparison, RNGR has a market cap of 399.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RES is priced at $7.06, while RNGR trades at $16.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RES currently has a P/E ratio of 78.33, whereas RNGR's P/E ratio is 26.71. In terms of profitability, RES's ROE is +0.02%, compared to RNGR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RES is less volatile compared to RNGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RES.Check RNGR's competition here
RES vs CCLP Comparison May 2026
RES plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RES stands at 1.6B. In comparison, CCLP has a market cap of 344.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RES is priced at $7.06, while CCLP trades at $2.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RES currently has a P/E ratio of 78.33, whereas CCLP's P/E ratio is -34.57. In terms of profitability, RES's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CCLP's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, RES is less volatile compared to CCLP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RES.Check CCLP's competition here
RES vs SND Comparison May 2026
RES plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RES stands at 1.6B. In comparison, SND has a market cap of 208.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RES is priced at $7.06, while SND trades at $4.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RES currently has a P/E ratio of 78.33, whereas SND's P/E ratio is 8.80. In terms of profitability, RES's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SND's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RES is less volatile compared to SND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RES.Check SND's competition here
RES vs OMSE Comparison May 2026
RES plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RES stands at 1.6B. In comparison, OMSE has a market cap of 199.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RES is priced at $7.06, while OMSE trades at $4.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RES currently has a P/E ratio of 78.33, whereas OMSE's P/E ratio is 6.81. In terms of profitability, RES's ROE is +0.02%, compared to OMSE's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, RES is less volatile compared to OMSE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RES.Check OMSE's competition here
RES vs BOOM Comparison May 2026
RES plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RES stands at 1.6B. In comparison, BOOM has a market cap of 145.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RES is priced at $7.06, while BOOM trades at $7.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RES currently has a P/E ratio of 78.33, whereas BOOM's P/E ratio is -5.56. In terms of profitability, RES's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BOOM's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RES is more volatile compared to BOOM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RES.Check BOOM's competition here
RES vs DWSN Comparison May 2026
RES plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RES stands at 1.6B. In comparison, DWSN has a market cap of 138.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RES is priced at $7.06, while DWSN trades at $4.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RES currently has a P/E ratio of 78.33, whereas DWSN's P/E ratio is 27.94. In terms of profitability, RES's ROE is +0.02%, compared to DWSN's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, RES is less volatile compared to DWSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RES.Check DWSN's competition here
RES vs PFIE Comparison May 2026
RES plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RES stands at 1.6B. In comparison, PFIE has a market cap of 117.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RES is priced at $7.06, while PFIE trades at $2.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RES currently has a P/E ratio of 78.33, whereas PFIE's P/E ratio is 13.37. In terms of profitability, RES's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PFIE's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, RES is more volatile compared to PFIE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RES.Check PFIE's competition here
RES vs NCSM Comparison May 2026
RES plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RES stands at 1.6B. In comparison, NCSM has a market cap of 114.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RES is priced at $7.06, while NCSM trades at $43.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RES currently has a P/E ratio of 78.33, whereas NCSM's P/E ratio is 6.23. In terms of profitability, RES's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NCSM's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RES is more volatile compared to NCSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RES.Check NCSM's competition here
RES vs DTI Comparison May 2026
RES plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RES stands at 1.6B. In comparison, DTI has a market cap of 105.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RES is priced at $7.06, while DTI trades at $3.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RES currently has a P/E ratio of 78.33, whereas DTI's P/E ratio is -30.10. In terms of profitability, RES's ROE is +0.02%, compared to DTI's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RES is more volatile compared to DTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RES.Check DTI's competition here
RES vs GEOS Comparison May 2026
RES plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RES stands at 1.6B. In comparison, GEOS has a market cap of 104.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RES is priced at $7.06, while GEOS trades at $8.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RES currently has a P/E ratio of 78.33, whereas GEOS's P/E ratio is -3.56. In terms of profitability, RES's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GEOS's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, RES is less volatile compared to GEOS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RES.Check GEOS's competition here
RES vs LSE Comparison May 2026
RES plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RES stands at 1.6B. In comparison, LSE has a market cap of 81.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RES is priced at $7.06, while LSE trades at $4.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RES currently has a P/E ratio of 78.33, whereas LSE's P/E ratio is 60.00. In terms of profitability, RES's ROE is +0.02%, compared to LSE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RES is less volatile compared to LSE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RES.Check LSE's competition here
RES vs KLXE Comparison May 2026
RES plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RES stands at 1.6B. In comparison, KLXE has a market cap of 75.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RES is priced at $7.06, while KLXE trades at $3.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RES currently has a P/E ratio of 78.33, whereas KLXE's P/E ratio is -1.01. In terms of profitability, RES's ROE is +0.02%, compared to KLXE's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RES is less volatile compared to KLXE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RES.Check KLXE's competition here
RES vs SDPI Comparison May 2026
RES plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RES stands at 1.6B. In comparison, SDPI has a market cap of 30.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RES is priced at $7.06, while SDPI trades at $1.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RES currently has a P/E ratio of 78.33, whereas SDPI's P/E ratio is 7.21. In terms of profitability, RES's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SDPI's ROE of +0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, RES is more volatile compared to SDPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RES.Check SDPI's competition here
RES vs RCON Comparison May 2026
RES plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RES stands at 1.6B. In comparison, RCON has a market cap of 20.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RES is priced at $7.06, while RCON trades at $0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RES currently has a P/E ratio of 78.33, whereas RCON's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, RES's ROE is +0.02%, compared to RCON's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RES is less volatile compared to RCON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RES.Check RCON's competition here
RES vs STAK Comparison May 2026
RES plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RES stands at 1.6B. In comparison, STAK has a market cap of 11.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RES is priced at $7.06, while STAK trades at $1.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RES currently has a P/E ratio of 78.33, whereas STAK's P/E ratio is -2.23. In terms of profitability, RES's ROE is +0.02%, compared to STAK's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, RES is less volatile compared to STAK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RES.Check STAK's competition here
RES vs ENSV Comparison May 2026
RES plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RES stands at 1.6B. In comparison, ENSV has a market cap of 29.1K. Regarding current trading prices, RES is priced at $7.06, while ENSV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RES currently has a P/E ratio of 78.33, whereas ENSV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RES's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ENSV's ROE of -28.53%. Regarding short-term risk, RES is more volatile compared to ENSV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RES.Check ENSV's competition here
RES vs VLI Comparison May 2026
RES plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RES stands at 1.6B. In comparison, VLI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RES is priced at $7.06, while VLI trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RES currently has a P/E ratio of 78.33, whereas VLI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RES's ROE is +0.02%, compared to VLI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RES is less volatile compared to VLI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RES.Check VLI's competition here
RES vs ACDCW Comparison May 2026
RES plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RES stands at 1.6B. In comparison, ACDCW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RES is priced at $7.06, while ACDCW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RES currently has a P/E ratio of 78.33, whereas ACDCW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RES's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ACDCW's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, RES is less volatile compared to ACDCW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RES.Check ACDCW's competition here
RES vs FTSI Comparison May 2026
RES plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RES stands at 1.6B. In comparison, FTSI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RES is priced at $7.06, while FTSI trades at $26.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RES currently has a P/E ratio of 78.33, whereas FTSI's P/E ratio is 4.67. In terms of profitability, RES's ROE is +0.02%, compared to FTSI's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RES is less volatile compared to FTSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RES.Check FTSI's competition here
RES vs CETC Comparison May 2026
RES plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RES stands at 1.6B. In comparison, CETC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RES is priced at $7.06, while CETC trades at $4.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RES currently has a P/E ratio of 78.33, whereas CETC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RES's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CETC's ROE of -1.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RES is less volatile compared to CETC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RES.Check CETC's competition here
RES vs EXTN Comparison May 2026
RES plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RES stands at 1.6B. In comparison, EXTN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RES is priced at $7.06, while EXTN trades at $4.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RES currently has a P/E ratio of 78.33, whereas EXTN's P/E ratio is -1.35. In terms of profitability, RES's ROE is +0.02%, compared to EXTN's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, RES is less volatile compared to EXTN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RES.Check EXTN's competition here
RES vs USWS Comparison May 2026
RES plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RES stands at 1.6B. In comparison, USWS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RES is priced at $7.06, while USWS trades at $7.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RES currently has a P/E ratio of 78.33, whereas USWS's P/E ratio is -3.94. In terms of profitability, RES's ROE is +0.02%, compared to USWS's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RES is less volatile compared to USWS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RES.Check USWS's competition here
RES vs USWSW Comparison May 2026
RES plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RES stands at 1.6B. In comparison, USWSW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RES is priced at $7.06, while USWSW trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RES currently has a P/E ratio of 78.33, whereas USWSW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RES's ROE is +0.02%, compared to USWSW's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RES is less volatile compared to USWSW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RES.Check USWSW's competition here
RES vs TDW-WTB Comparison May 2026
RES plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RES stands at 1.6B. In comparison, TDW-WTB has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RES is priced at $7.06, while TDW-WTB trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RES currently has a P/E ratio of 78.33, whereas TDW-WTB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RES's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TDW-WTB's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, RES is less volatile compared to TDW-WTB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RES.Check TDW-WTB's competition here
RES vs TDW-WTA Comparison May 2026
RES plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RES stands at 1.6B. In comparison, TDW-WTA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RES is priced at $7.06, while TDW-WTA trades at $2.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RES currently has a P/E ratio of 78.33, whereas TDW-WTA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RES's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TDW-WTA's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, RES is less volatile compared to TDW-WTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RES.Check TDW-WTA's competition here
RES vs CELP Comparison May 2026
RES plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RES stands at 1.6B. In comparison, CELP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RES is priced at $7.06, while CELP trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RES currently has a P/E ratio of 78.33, whereas CELP's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, RES's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CELP's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RES is less volatile compared to CELP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RES.Check CELP's competition here
RES vs GLF Comparison May 2026
RES plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RES stands at 1.6B. In comparison, GLF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RES is priced at $7.06, while GLF trades at $28.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RES currently has a P/E ratio of 78.33, whereas GLF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RES's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GLF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RES is less volatile compared to GLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RES.Check GLF's competition here
RES vs APLP Comparison May 2026
RES plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RES stands at 1.6B. In comparison, APLP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RES is priced at $7.06, while APLP trades at $15.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RES currently has a P/E ratio of 78.33, whereas APLP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RES's ROE is +0.02%, compared to APLP's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, RES is more volatile compared to APLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RES.Check APLP's competition here
RES vs IO Comparison May 2026
RES plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RES stands at 1.6B. In comparison, IO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RES is priced at $7.06, while IO trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RES currently has a P/E ratio of 78.33, whereas IO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RES's ROE is +0.02%, compared to IO's ROE of +0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, RES is less volatile compared to IO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RES.Check IO's competition here