Core Laboratories N.V. (CLB) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CLB) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Oil & Gas Equipment & Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CLB | $13.16 | -0.68% | 605.7M | 21.54 | $0.61 | +0.30% |
| SLB | $56.18 | +0.32% | 84B | 24.75 | $2.27 | +2.05% |
| BKR | $63.14 | -0.54% | 62.6B | 20.17 | $3.13 | +1.45% |
| TS | $62.92 | +1.52% | 33.8B | 16.55 | $3.80 | +2.82% |
| HAL | $39.60 | -0.40% | 33.1B | 21.87 | $1.81 | +1.71% |
| FTI | $70.79 | +0.27% | 28.2B | 27.12 | $2.61 | +0.28% |
| NOV | $21.13 | +0.05% | 7.6B | 84.54 | $0.25 | +1.97% |
| WFRD | $101.31 | -1.64% | 7.3B | 15.85 | $6.39 | +1.03% |
| KGS | $69.08 | +2.92% | 7B | 90.88 | $0.76 | +2.78% |
| AROC | $36.61 | +1.50% | 6.4B | 19.89 | $1.84 | +2.35% |
Stock Comparison
CLB vs SLB Comparison June 2026
CLB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLB stands at 605.7M. In comparison, SLB has a market cap of 84B. Regarding current trading prices, CLB is priced at $13.16, while SLB trades at $56.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLB currently has a P/E ratio of 21.54, whereas SLB's P/E ratio is 24.75. In terms of profitability, CLB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SLB's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CLB is more volatile compared to SLB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLB.Check SLB's competition here
CLB vs BKR Comparison June 2026
CLB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLB stands at 605.7M. In comparison, BKR has a market cap of 62.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CLB is priced at $13.16, while BKR trades at $63.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLB currently has a P/E ratio of 21.54, whereas BKR's P/E ratio is 20.17. In terms of profitability, CLB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BKR's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CLB is more volatile compared to BKR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLB.Check BKR's competition here
CLB vs TS Comparison June 2026
CLB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLB stands at 605.7M. In comparison, TS has a market cap of 33.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CLB is priced at $13.16, while TS trades at $62.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLB currently has a P/E ratio of 21.54, whereas TS's P/E ratio is 16.55. In terms of profitability, CLB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CLB is less volatile compared to TS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLB.Check TS's competition here
CLB vs HAL Comparison June 2026
CLB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLB stands at 605.7M. In comparison, HAL has a market cap of 33.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CLB is priced at $13.16, while HAL trades at $39.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLB currently has a P/E ratio of 21.54, whereas HAL's P/E ratio is 21.87. In terms of profitability, CLB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HAL's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CLB is more volatile compared to HAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLB.Check HAL's competition here
CLB vs FTI Comparison June 2026
CLB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLB stands at 605.7M. In comparison, FTI has a market cap of 28.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CLB is priced at $13.16, while FTI trades at $70.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLB currently has a P/E ratio of 21.54, whereas FTI's P/E ratio is 27.12. In terms of profitability, CLB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FTI's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CLB is more volatile compared to FTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLB.Check FTI's competition here
CLB vs NOV Comparison June 2026
CLB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLB stands at 605.7M. In comparison, NOV has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CLB is priced at $13.16, while NOV trades at $21.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLB currently has a P/E ratio of 21.54, whereas NOV's P/E ratio is 84.54. In terms of profitability, CLB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NOV's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CLB is less volatile compared to NOV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLB.Check NOV's competition here
CLB vs WFRD Comparison June 2026
CLB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLB stands at 605.7M. In comparison, WFRD has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CLB is priced at $13.16, while WFRD trades at $101.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLB currently has a P/E ratio of 21.54, whereas WFRD's P/E ratio is 15.85. In terms of profitability, CLB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WFRD's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CLB is less volatile compared to WFRD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLB.Check WFRD's competition here
CLB vs KGS Comparison June 2026
CLB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLB stands at 605.7M. In comparison, KGS has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, CLB is priced at $13.16, while KGS trades at $69.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLB currently has a P/E ratio of 21.54, whereas KGS's P/E ratio is 90.88. In terms of profitability, CLB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KGS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CLB is less volatile compared to KGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLB.Check KGS's competition here
CLB vs AROC Comparison June 2026
CLB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLB stands at 605.7M. In comparison, AROC has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CLB is priced at $13.16, while AROC trades at $36.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLB currently has a P/E ratio of 21.54, whereas AROC's P/E ratio is 19.89. In terms of profitability, CLB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AROC's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CLB is less volatile compared to AROC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLB.Check AROC's competition here
CLB vs VAL Comparison June 2026
CLB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLB stands at 605.7M. In comparison, VAL has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CLB is priced at $13.16, while VAL trades at $89.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLB currently has a P/E ratio of 21.54, whereas VAL's P/E ratio is 6.36. In terms of profitability, CLB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VAL's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, CLB is more volatile compared to VAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLB.Check VAL's competition here
CLB vs LB Comparison June 2026
CLB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLB stands at 605.7M. In comparison, LB has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CLB is priced at $13.16, while LB trades at $69.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLB currently has a P/E ratio of 21.54, whereas LB's P/E ratio is 71.36. In terms of profitability, CLB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LB's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CLB is less volatile compared to LB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLB.Check LB's competition here
CLB vs SEI Comparison June 2026
CLB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLB stands at 605.7M. In comparison, SEI has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CLB is priced at $13.16, while SEI trades at $74.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLB currently has a P/E ratio of 21.54, whereas SEI's P/E ratio is 88.12. In terms of profitability, CLB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SEI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CLB is less volatile compared to SEI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLB.Check SEI's competition here
CLB vs CHX Comparison June 2026
CLB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLB stands at 605.7M. In comparison, CHX has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CLB is priced at $13.16, while CHX trades at $25.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLB currently has a P/E ratio of 21.54, whereas CHX's P/E ratio is 17.09. In terms of profitability, CLB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CHX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CLB is more volatile compared to CHX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLB.Check CHX's competition here
CLB vs LBRT Comparison June 2026
CLB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLB stands at 605.7M. In comparison, LBRT has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CLB is priced at $13.16, while LBRT trades at $28.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLB currently has a P/E ratio of 21.54, whereas LBRT's P/E ratio is 31.71. In terms of profitability, CLB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LBRT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CLB is less volatile compared to LBRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLB.Check LBRT's competition here
CLB vs WHD Comparison June 2026
CLB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLB stands at 605.7M. In comparison, WHD has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, CLB is priced at $13.16, while WHD trades at $59.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLB currently has a P/E ratio of 21.54, whereas WHD's P/E ratio is 54.21. In terms of profitability, CLB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WHD's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CLB is less volatile compared to WHD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLB.Check WHD's competition here
CLB vs OII Comparison June 2026
CLB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLB stands at 605.7M. In comparison, OII has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CLB is priced at $13.16, while OII trades at $39.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLB currently has a P/E ratio of 21.54, whereas OII's P/E ratio is 11.73. In terms of profitability, CLB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to OII's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, CLB is less volatile compared to OII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLB.Check OII's competition here
CLB vs TDW Comparison June 2026
CLB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLB stands at 605.7M. In comparison, TDW has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CLB is priced at $13.16, while TDW trades at $76.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLB currently has a P/E ratio of 21.54, whereas TDW's P/E ratio is 12.97. In terms of profitability, CLB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TDW's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CLB is less volatile compared to TDW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLB.Check TDW's competition here
CLB vs USAC Comparison June 2026
CLB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLB stands at 605.7M. In comparison, USAC has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CLB is priced at $13.16, while USAC trades at $26.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLB currently has a P/E ratio of 21.54, whereas USAC's P/E ratio is 27.38. In terms of profitability, CLB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to USAC's ROE of +6.51%. Regarding short-term risk, CLB is less volatile compared to USAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLB.Check USAC's competition here
CLB vs CAM Comparison June 2026
CLB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLB stands at 605.7M. In comparison, CAM has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CLB is priced at $13.16, while CAM trades at $66.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLB currently has a P/E ratio of 21.54, whereas CAM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CAM's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CLB is more volatile compared to CAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLB.Check CAM's competition here
CLB vs EFXT Comparison June 2026
CLB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLB stands at 605.7M. In comparison, EFXT has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, CLB is priced at $13.16, while EFXT trades at $24.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLB currently has a P/E ratio of 21.54, whereas EFXT's P/E ratio is 35.76. In terms of profitability, CLB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EFXT's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CLB is less volatile compared to EFXT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLB.Check EFXT's competition here
CLB vs NESR Comparison June 2026
CLB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLB stands at 605.7M. In comparison, NESR has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CLB is priced at $13.16, while NESR trades at $26.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLB currently has a P/E ratio of 21.54, whereas NESR's P/E ratio is 41.41. In terms of profitability, CLB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NESR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CLB is less volatile compared to NESR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLB.Check NESR's competition here
CLB vs TDW-WT Comparison June 2026
CLB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLB stands at 605.7M. In comparison, TDW-WT has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CLB is priced at $13.16, while TDW-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLB currently has a P/E ratio of 21.54, whereas TDW-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TDW-WT's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CLB is more volatile compared to TDW-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLB.Check TDW-WT's competition here
CLB vs NEX Comparison June 2026
CLB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLB stands at 605.7M. In comparison, NEX has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CLB is priced at $13.16, while NEX trades at $10.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLB currently has a P/E ratio of 21.54, whereas NEX's P/E ratio is 3.94. In terms of profitability, CLB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NEX's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, CLB is less volatile compared to NEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLB.Check NEX's competition here
CLB vs EROK Comparison June 2026
CLB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLB stands at 605.7M. In comparison, EROK has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CLB is priced at $13.16, while EROK trades at $21.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLB currently has a P/E ratio of 21.54, whereas EROK's P/E ratio is 2124.00. In terms of profitability, CLB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EROK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CLB is less volatile compared to EROK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLB.Check EROK's competition here
CLB vs FLOC Comparison June 2026
CLB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLB stands at 605.7M. In comparison, FLOC has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CLB is priced at $13.16, while FLOC trades at $23.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLB currently has a P/E ratio of 21.54, whereas FLOC's P/E ratio is 19.30. In terms of profitability, CLB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FLOC's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CLB is less volatile compared to FLOC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLB.Check FLOC's competition here
CLB vs AESI Comparison June 2026
CLB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLB stands at 605.7M. In comparison, AESI has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CLB is priced at $13.16, while AESI trades at $16.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLB currently has a P/E ratio of 21.54, whereas AESI's P/E ratio is -21.22. In terms of profitability, CLB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AESI's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CLB is less volatile compared to AESI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLB.Check AESI's competition here
CLB vs INVX Comparison June 2026
CLB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLB stands at 605.7M. In comparison, INVX has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, CLB is priced at $13.16, while INVX trades at $29.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLB currently has a P/E ratio of 21.54, whereas INVX's P/E ratio is 39.25. In terms of profitability, CLB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to INVX's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CLB is less volatile compared to INVX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLB.Check INVX's competition here
CLB vs PUMP Comparison June 2026
CLB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLB stands at 605.7M. In comparison, PUMP has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CLB is priced at $13.16, while PUMP trades at $15.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLB currently has a P/E ratio of 21.54, whereas PUMP's P/E ratio is -141.09. In terms of profitability, CLB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PUMP's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CLB is less volatile compared to PUMP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLB.Check PUMP's competition here
CLB vs XPRO Comparison June 2026
CLB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLB stands at 605.7M. In comparison, XPRO has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CLB is priced at $13.16, while XPRO trades at $16.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLB currently has a P/E ratio of 21.54, whereas XPRO's P/E ratio is 51.47. In terms of profitability, CLB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to XPRO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CLB is less volatile compared to XPRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLB.Check XPRO's competition here
CLB vs DNOW Comparison June 2026
CLB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLB stands at 605.7M. In comparison, DNOW has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CLB is priced at $13.16, while DNOW trades at $14.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLB currently has a P/E ratio of 21.54, whereas DNOW's P/E ratio is -11.80. In terms of profitability, CLB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DNOW's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CLB is less volatile compared to DNOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLB.Check DNOW's competition here
CLB vs RES Comparison June 2026
CLB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLB stands at 605.7M. In comparison, RES has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CLB is priced at $13.16, while RES trades at $7.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLB currently has a P/E ratio of 21.54, whereas RES's P/E ratio is 79.89. In terms of profitability, CLB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RES's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CLB is less volatile compared to RES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLB.Check RES's competition here
CLB vs HLX Comparison June 2026
CLB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLB stands at 605.7M. In comparison, HLX has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CLB is priced at $13.16, while HLX trades at $9.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLB currently has a P/E ratio of 21.54, whereas HLX's P/E ratio is 97.45. In terms of profitability, CLB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HLX's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CLB is less volatile compared to HLX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLB.Check HLX's competition here
CLB vs TTI Comparison June 2026
CLB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLB stands at 605.7M. In comparison, TTI has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CLB is priced at $13.16, while TTI trades at $10.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLB currently has a P/E ratio of 21.54, whereas TTI's P/E ratio is 173.17. In terms of profitability, CLB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TTI's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CLB is less volatile compared to TTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLB.Check TTI's competition here
CLB vs ACDC Comparison June 2026
CLB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLB stands at 605.7M. In comparison, ACDC has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CLB is priced at $13.16, while ACDC trades at $7.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLB currently has a P/E ratio of 21.54, whereas ACDC's P/E ratio is -2.94. In terms of profitability, CLB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ACDC's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, CLB is less volatile compared to ACDC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLB.Check ACDC's competition here
CLB vs VTOL Comparison June 2026
CLB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLB stands at 605.7M. In comparison, VTOL has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CLB is priced at $13.16, while VTOL trades at $43.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLB currently has a P/E ratio of 21.54, whereas VTOL's P/E ratio is 11.45. In terms of profitability, CLB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VTOL's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CLB is less volatile compared to VTOL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLB.Check VTOL's competition here
CLB vs NPKI Comparison June 2026
CLB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLB stands at 605.7M. In comparison, NPKI has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CLB is priced at $13.16, while NPKI trades at $14.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLB currently has a P/E ratio of 21.54, whereas NPKI's P/E ratio is 35.71. In terms of profitability, CLB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NPKI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CLB is less volatile compared to NPKI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLB.Check NPKI's competition here
CLB vs SLCA Comparison June 2026
CLB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLB stands at 605.7M. In comparison, SLCA has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CLB is priced at $13.16, while SLCA trades at $15.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLB currently has a P/E ratio of 21.54, whereas SLCA's P/E ratio is 10.54. In terms of profitability, CLB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SLCA's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CLB is more volatile compared to SLCA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLB.Check SLCA's competition here
CLB vs PFHC Comparison June 2026
CLB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLB stands at 605.7M. In comparison, PFHC has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CLB is priced at $13.16, while PFHC trades at $22.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLB currently has a P/E ratio of 21.54, whereas PFHC's P/E ratio is 105.14. In terms of profitability, CLB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PFHC's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, CLB is less volatile compared to PFHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLB.Check PFHC's competition here
CLB vs MRC Comparison June 2026
CLB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLB stands at 605.7M. In comparison, MRC has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CLB is priced at $13.16, while MRC trades at $13.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLB currently has a P/E ratio of 21.54, whereas MRC's P/E ratio is 59.91. In terms of profitability, CLB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MRC's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CLB is less volatile compared to MRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLB.Check MRC's competition here
CLB vs VAL-WT Comparison June 2026
CLB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLB stands at 605.7M. In comparison, VAL-WT has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CLB is priced at $13.16, while VAL-WT trades at $15.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLB currently has a P/E ratio of 21.54, whereas VAL-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VAL-WT's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, CLB is less volatile compared to VAL-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLB.Check VAL-WT's competition here
CLB vs HMH Comparison June 2026
CLB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLB stands at 605.7M. In comparison, HMH has a market cap of 932.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CLB is priced at $13.16, while HMH trades at $20.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLB currently has a P/E ratio of 21.54, whereas HMH's P/E ratio is 160.54. In terms of profitability, CLB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HMH's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CLB is less volatile compared to HMH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLB.Check HMH's competition here
CLB vs FTK Comparison June 2026
CLB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLB stands at 605.7M. In comparison, FTK has a market cap of 742.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CLB is priced at $13.16, while FTK trades at $24.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLB currently has a P/E ratio of 21.54, whereas FTK's P/E ratio is 31.20. In terms of profitability, CLB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FTK's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CLB is less volatile compared to FTK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLB.Check FTK's competition here
CLB vs NESRW Comparison June 2026
CLB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLB stands at 605.7M. In comparison, NESRW has a market cap of 709.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CLB is priced at $13.16, while NESRW trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLB currently has a P/E ratio of 21.54, whereas NESRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NESRW's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CLB is less volatile compared to NESRW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLB.Check NESRW's competition here
CLB vs NR Comparison June 2026
CLB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLB stands at 605.7M. In comparison, NR has a market cap of 627.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CLB is priced at $13.16, while NR trades at $7.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLB currently has a P/E ratio of 21.54, whereas NR's P/E ratio is 19.08. In terms of profitability, CLB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CLB is less volatile compared to NR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLB.Check NR's competition here
CLB vs FET Comparison June 2026
CLB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLB stands at 605.7M. In comparison, FET has a market cap of 598.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CLB is priced at $13.16, while FET trades at $52.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLB currently has a P/E ratio of 21.54, whereas FET's P/E ratio is -103.86. In terms of profitability, CLB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FET's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CLB is less volatile compared to FET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLB.Check FET's competition here
CLB vs NGS Comparison June 2026
CLB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLB stands at 605.7M. In comparison, NGS has a market cap of 533.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CLB is priced at $13.16, while NGS trades at $42.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLB currently has a P/E ratio of 21.54, whereas NGS's P/E ratio is 24.64. In terms of profitability, CLB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NGS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CLB is less volatile compared to NGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLB.Check NGS's competition here
CLB vs DRQ Comparison June 2026
CLB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLB stands at 605.7M. In comparison, DRQ has a market cap of 530.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CLB is priced at $13.16, while DRQ trades at $15.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLB currently has a P/E ratio of 21.54, whereas DRQ's P/E ratio is -19.76. In terms of profitability, CLB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DRQ's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CLB is less volatile compared to DRQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLB.Check DRQ's competition here
CLB vs OIS Comparison June 2026
CLB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLB stands at 605.7M. In comparison, OIS has a market cap of 511.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CLB is priced at $13.16, while OIS trades at $8.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLB currently has a P/E ratio of 21.54, whereas OIS's P/E ratio is -4.50. In terms of profitability, CLB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to OIS's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CLB is less volatile compared to OIS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLB.Check OIS's competition here
CLB vs SOI Comparison June 2026
CLB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLB stands at 605.7M. In comparison, SOI has a market cap of 498.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CLB is priced at $13.16, while SOI trades at $11.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLB currently has a P/E ratio of 21.54, whereas SOI's P/E ratio is 17.15. In terms of profitability, CLB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SOI's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, CLB is less volatile compared to SOI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLB.Check SOI's competition here
CLB vs NINE Comparison June 2026
CLB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLB stands at 605.7M. In comparison, NINE has a market cap of 451.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CLB is priced at $13.16, while NINE trades at $10.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLB currently has a P/E ratio of 21.54, whereas NINE's P/E ratio is -8.68. In terms of profitability, CLB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NINE's ROE of -1.57%. Regarding short-term risk, CLB is less volatile compared to NINE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLB.Check NINE's competition here
CLB vs RNGR Comparison June 2026
CLB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLB stands at 605.7M. In comparison, RNGR has a market cap of 376.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CLB is priced at $13.16, while RNGR trades at $15.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLB currently has a P/E ratio of 21.54, whereas RNGR's P/E ratio is 25.14. In terms of profitability, CLB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RNGR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CLB is less volatile compared to RNGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLB.Check RNGR's competition here
CLB vs NOA Comparison June 2026
CLB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLB stands at 605.7M. In comparison, NOA has a market cap of 366.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CLB is priced at $13.16, while NOA trades at $13.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLB currently has a P/E ratio of 21.54, whereas NOA's P/E ratio is 16.90. In terms of profitability, CLB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NOA's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CLB is more volatile compared to NOA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLB.Check NOA's competition here
CLB vs CCLP Comparison June 2026
CLB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLB stands at 605.7M. In comparison, CCLP has a market cap of 344.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CLB is priced at $13.16, while CCLP trades at $2.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLB currently has a P/E ratio of 21.54, whereas CCLP's P/E ratio is -34.57. In terms of profitability, CLB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CCLP's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, CLB is less volatile compared to CCLP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLB.Check CCLP's competition here
CLB vs SND Comparison June 2026
CLB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLB stands at 605.7M. In comparison, SND has a market cap of 228.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CLB is priced at $13.16, while SND trades at $5.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLB currently has a P/E ratio of 21.54, whereas SND's P/E ratio is 9.67. In terms of profitability, CLB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SND's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CLB is less volatile compared to SND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLB.Check SND's competition here
CLB vs OMSE Comparison June 2026
CLB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLB stands at 605.7M. In comparison, OMSE has a market cap of 191M. Regarding current trading prices, CLB is priced at $13.16, while OMSE trades at $4.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLB currently has a P/E ratio of 21.54, whereas OMSE's P/E ratio is 6.52. In terms of profitability, CLB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to OMSE's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, CLB is more volatile compared to OMSE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLB.Check OMSE's competition here
CLB vs BOOM Comparison June 2026
CLB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLB stands at 605.7M. In comparison, BOOM has a market cap of 145.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CLB is priced at $13.16, while BOOM trades at $7.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLB currently has a P/E ratio of 21.54, whereas BOOM's P/E ratio is -5.54. In terms of profitability, CLB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BOOM's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CLB is less volatile compared to BOOM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLB.Check BOOM's competition here
CLB vs DWSN Comparison June 2026
CLB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLB stands at 605.7M. In comparison, DWSN has a market cap of 143.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CLB is priced at $13.16, while DWSN trades at $4.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLB currently has a P/E ratio of 21.54, whereas DWSN's P/E ratio is 28.94. In terms of profitability, CLB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DWSN's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CLB is less volatile compared to DWSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLB.Check DWSN's competition here
CLB vs NCSM Comparison June 2026
CLB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLB stands at 605.7M. In comparison, NCSM has a market cap of 142.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CLB is priced at $13.16, while NCSM trades at $54.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLB currently has a P/E ratio of 21.54, whereas NCSM's P/E ratio is 7.76. In terms of profitability, CLB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NCSM's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CLB is less volatile compared to NCSM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLB.Check NCSM's competition here
CLB vs PFIE Comparison June 2026
CLB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLB stands at 605.7M. In comparison, PFIE has a market cap of 117.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CLB is priced at $13.16, while PFIE trades at $2.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLB currently has a P/E ratio of 21.54, whereas PFIE's P/E ratio is 13.37. In terms of profitability, CLB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PFIE's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CLB is more volatile compared to PFIE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLB.Check PFIE's competition here
CLB vs GEOS Comparison June 2026
CLB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLB stands at 605.7M. In comparison, GEOS has a market cap of 93.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CLB is priced at $13.16, while GEOS trades at $7.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLB currently has a P/E ratio of 21.54, whereas GEOS's P/E ratio is -3.20. In terms of profitability, CLB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GEOS's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CLB is less volatile compared to GEOS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLB.Check GEOS's competition here
CLB vs DTI Comparison June 2026
CLB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLB stands at 605.7M. In comparison, DTI has a market cap of 92.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CLB is priced at $13.16, while DTI trades at $2.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLB currently has a P/E ratio of 21.54, whereas DTI's P/E ratio is -26.30. In terms of profitability, CLB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DTI's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CLB is less volatile compared to DTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLB.Check DTI's competition here
CLB vs STAK Comparison June 2026
CLB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLB stands at 605.7M. In comparison, STAK has a market cap of 77.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CLB is priced at $13.16, while STAK trades at $7.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLB currently has a P/E ratio of 21.54, whereas STAK's P/E ratio is -13.54. In terms of profitability, CLB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to STAK's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, CLB is less volatile compared to STAK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLB.Check STAK's competition here
CLB vs LSE Comparison June 2026
CLB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLB stands at 605.7M. In comparison, LSE has a market cap of 67.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CLB is priced at $13.16, while LSE trades at $3.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLB currently has a P/E ratio of 21.54, whereas LSE's P/E ratio is 49.31. In terms of profitability, CLB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LSE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CLB is less volatile compared to LSE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLB.Check LSE's competition here
CLB vs KLXE Comparison June 2026
CLB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLB stands at 605.7M. In comparison, KLXE has a market cap of 56.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CLB is priced at $13.16, while KLXE trades at $2.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLB currently has a P/E ratio of 21.54, whereas KLXE's P/E ratio is -0.76. In terms of profitability, CLB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KLXE's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CLB is less volatile compared to KLXE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLB.Check KLXE's competition here
CLB vs SDPI Comparison June 2026
CLB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLB stands at 605.7M. In comparison, SDPI has a market cap of 30.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CLB is priced at $13.16, while SDPI trades at $1.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLB currently has a P/E ratio of 21.54, whereas SDPI's P/E ratio is 7.21. In terms of profitability, CLB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SDPI's ROE of +0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, CLB is more volatile compared to SDPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLB.Check SDPI's competition here
CLB vs RCON Comparison June 2026
CLB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLB stands at 605.7M. In comparison, RCON has a market cap of 16.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CLB is priced at $13.16, while RCON trades at $0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLB currently has a P/E ratio of 21.54, whereas RCON's P/E ratio is -1.20. In terms of profitability, CLB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RCON's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CLB is less volatile compared to RCON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLB.Check RCON's competition here
CLB vs FTSI Comparison June 2026
CLB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLB stands at 605.7M. In comparison, FTSI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CLB is priced at $13.16, while FTSI trades at $26.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLB currently has a P/E ratio of 21.54, whereas FTSI's P/E ratio is 4.67. In terms of profitability, CLB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FTSI's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CLB is less volatile compared to FTSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLB.Check FTSI's competition here
CLB vs TDW-WTA Comparison June 2026
CLB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLB stands at 605.7M. In comparison, TDW-WTA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CLB is priced at $13.16, while TDW-WTA trades at $2.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLB currently has a P/E ratio of 21.54, whereas TDW-WTA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TDW-WTA's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CLB is less volatile compared to TDW-WTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLB.Check TDW-WTA's competition here
CLB vs CELP Comparison June 2026
CLB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLB stands at 605.7M. In comparison, CELP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CLB is priced at $13.16, while CELP trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLB currently has a P/E ratio of 21.54, whereas CELP's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, CLB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CELP's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CLB is less volatile compared to CELP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLB.Check CELP's competition here
CLB vs GLF Comparison June 2026
CLB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLB stands at 605.7M. In comparison, GLF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CLB is priced at $13.16, while GLF trades at $28.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLB currently has a P/E ratio of 21.54, whereas GLF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GLF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CLB is less volatile compared to GLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLB.Check GLF's competition here
CLB vs EXTN Comparison June 2026
CLB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLB stands at 605.7M. In comparison, EXTN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CLB is priced at $13.16, while EXTN trades at $4.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLB currently has a P/E ratio of 21.54, whereas EXTN's P/E ratio is -1.35. In terms of profitability, CLB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EXTN's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, CLB is less volatile compared to EXTN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLB.Check EXTN's competition here
CLB vs APLP Comparison June 2026
CLB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLB stands at 605.7M. In comparison, APLP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CLB is priced at $13.16, while APLP trades at $15.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLB currently has a P/E ratio of 21.54, whereas APLP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to APLP's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CLB is more volatile compared to APLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLB.Check APLP's competition here
CLB vs USWS Comparison June 2026
CLB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLB stands at 605.7M. In comparison, USWS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CLB is priced at $13.16, while USWS trades at $7.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLB currently has a P/E ratio of 21.54, whereas USWS's P/E ratio is -3.94. In terms of profitability, CLB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to USWS's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CLB is less volatile compared to USWS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLB.Check USWS's competition here
CLB vs VLI Comparison June 2026
CLB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLB stands at 605.7M. In comparison, VLI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CLB is priced at $13.16, while VLI trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLB currently has a P/E ratio of 21.54, whereas VLI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VLI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CLB is less volatile compared to VLI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLB.Check VLI's competition here
CLB vs ACDCW Comparison June 2026
CLB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLB stands at 605.7M. In comparison, ACDCW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CLB is priced at $13.16, while ACDCW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLB currently has a P/E ratio of 21.54, whereas ACDCW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ACDCW's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, CLB is less volatile compared to ACDCW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLB.Check ACDCW's competition here
CLB vs CETC Comparison June 2026
CLB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLB stands at 605.7M. In comparison, CETC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CLB is priced at $13.16, while CETC trades at $4.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLB currently has a P/E ratio of 21.54, whereas CETC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CETC's ROE of -1.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CLB is less volatile compared to CETC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLB.Check CETC's competition here
CLB vs TDW-WTB Comparison June 2026
CLB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLB stands at 605.7M. In comparison, TDW-WTB has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CLB is priced at $13.16, while TDW-WTB trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLB currently has a P/E ratio of 21.54, whereas TDW-WTB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TDW-WTB's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CLB is less volatile compared to TDW-WTB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLB.Check TDW-WTB's competition here
CLB vs IO Comparison June 2026
CLB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLB stands at 605.7M. In comparison, IO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CLB is priced at $13.16, while IO trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLB currently has a P/E ratio of 21.54, whereas IO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to IO's ROE of +0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, CLB is less volatile compared to IO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLB.Check IO's competition here
CLB vs USWSW Comparison June 2026
CLB plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLB stands at 605.7M. In comparison, USWSW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CLB is priced at $13.16, while USWSW trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLB currently has a P/E ratio of 21.54, whereas USWSW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to USWSW's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CLB is less volatile compared to USWSW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLB.Check USWSW's competition here