Leishen Energy Holding Co., Ltd. (NASDAQ: LSE) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See LSE's competitors and their performance on the NASDAQ and across the wider stock market.
Peer Comparison Table: Oil & Gas Equipment & Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more for LSE and its NASDAQ peers.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LSE | $4.35 | +1.64% | 71.5M | 52.50 | $0.08 | N/A |
| SLB | $52.42 | +11.01% | 78.4B | 19.21 | $2.73 | +2.21% |
| BKR | $57.25 | +2.07% | 56.8B | 21.44 | $2.67 | +1.60% |
| TS | $57.67 | +0.54% | 30.9B | 15.25 | $3.78 | +3.08% |
| FTI | $76.75 | +0.96% | 30.6B | 27.71 | $2.77 | +0.26% |
| HAL | $33.36 | +2.00% | 27.9B | 14.07 | $2.37 | +2.04% |
| NOV | $20.76 | +3.13% | 7.5B | 36.44 | $0.57 | +2.03% |
| WFRD | $88.68 | +3.60% | 6.4B | 13.88 | $6.39 | +1.20% |
| AROC | $36.14 | -5.86% | 6.3B | 18.82 | $1.92 | +2.39% |
| KGS | $59.08 | -9.50% | 6B | 40.72 | $1.45 | +3.28% |
Stock Comparison
Slb N.V. (NYSE: SLB)
LSE vs SLB Comparison July 2026
Leishen Energy Holding Co., Ltd. (NASDAQ: LSE) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LSE stands at 71.5M. In comparison, SLB has a market cap of 78.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LSE is priced at $4.35 on the NASDAQ, while SLB trades at $52.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LSE currently has a P/E ratio of 52.50, whereas SLB's P/E ratio is 19.21. In terms of profitability, LSE's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SLB's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LSE is more volatile compared to SLB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSE.Check SLB's competition here
Baker Hughes Company (NASDAQ: BKR)
LSE vs BKR Comparison July 2026
Leishen Energy Holding Co., Ltd. (NASDAQ: LSE) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LSE stands at 71.5M. In comparison, BKR has a market cap of 56.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LSE is priced at $4.35 on the NASDAQ, while BKR trades at $57.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LSE currently has a P/E ratio of 52.50, whereas BKR's P/E ratio is 21.44. In terms of profitability, LSE's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BKR's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LSE is more volatile compared to BKR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSE.Check BKR's competition here
Tenaris S.A. (NYSE: TS)
LSE vs TS Comparison July 2026
Leishen Energy Holding Co., Ltd. (NASDAQ: LSE) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LSE stands at 71.5M. In comparison, TS has a market cap of 30.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LSE is priced at $4.35 on the NASDAQ, while TS trades at $57.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LSE currently has a P/E ratio of 52.50, whereas TS's P/E ratio is 15.25. In terms of profitability, LSE's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LSE is more volatile compared to TS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSE.Check TS's competition here
TechnipFMC plc (NYSE: FTI)
LSE vs FTI Comparison July 2026
Leishen Energy Holding Co., Ltd. (NASDAQ: LSE) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LSE stands at 71.5M. In comparison, FTI has a market cap of 30.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LSE is priced at $4.35 on the NASDAQ, while FTI trades at $76.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LSE currently has a P/E ratio of 52.50, whereas FTI's P/E ratio is 27.71. In terms of profitability, LSE's ROE is +0.03%, compared to FTI's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, LSE is more volatile compared to FTI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSE.Check FTI's competition here
Halliburton Company (NYSE: HAL)
LSE vs HAL Comparison July 2026
Leishen Energy Holding Co., Ltd. (NASDAQ: LSE) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LSE stands at 71.5M. In comparison, HAL has a market cap of 27.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LSE is priced at $4.35 on the NASDAQ, while HAL trades at $33.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LSE currently has a P/E ratio of 52.50, whereas HAL's P/E ratio is 14.07. In terms of profitability, LSE's ROE is +0.03%, compared to HAL's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LSE is more volatile compared to HAL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSE.Check HAL's competition here
NOV Inc. (NYSE: NOV)
LSE vs NOV Comparison July 2026
Leishen Energy Holding Co., Ltd. (NASDAQ: LSE) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LSE stands at 71.5M. In comparison, NOV has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LSE is priced at $4.35 on the NASDAQ, while NOV trades at $20.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LSE currently has a P/E ratio of 52.50, whereas NOV's P/E ratio is 36.44. In terms of profitability, LSE's ROE is +0.03%, compared to NOV's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LSE is more volatile compared to NOV. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSE.Check NOV's competition here
Weatherford International plc (NASDAQ: WFRD)
LSE vs WFRD Comparison July 2026
Leishen Energy Holding Co., Ltd. (NASDAQ: LSE) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LSE stands at 71.5M. In comparison, WFRD has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LSE is priced at $4.35 on the NASDAQ, while WFRD trades at $88.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LSE currently has a P/E ratio of 52.50, whereas WFRD's P/E ratio is 13.88. In terms of profitability, LSE's ROE is +0.03%, compared to WFRD's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LSE is more volatile compared to WFRD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSE.Check WFRD's competition here
Archrock, Inc. (NYSE: AROC)
LSE vs AROC Comparison July 2026
Leishen Energy Holding Co., Ltd. (NASDAQ: LSE) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LSE stands at 71.5M. In comparison, AROC has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LSE is priced at $4.35 on the NASDAQ, while AROC trades at $36.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LSE currently has a P/E ratio of 52.50, whereas AROC's P/E ratio is 18.82. In terms of profitability, LSE's ROE is +0.03%, compared to AROC's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LSE is less volatile compared to AROC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSE.Check AROC's competition here
Kodiak Gas Services, Inc. (NYSE: KGS)
LSE vs KGS Comparison July 2026
Leishen Energy Holding Co., Ltd. (NASDAQ: LSE) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LSE stands at 71.5M. In comparison, KGS has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, LSE is priced at $4.35 on the NASDAQ, while KGS trades at $59.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LSE currently has a P/E ratio of 52.50, whereas KGS's P/E ratio is 40.72. In terms of profitability, LSE's ROE is +0.03%, compared to KGS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LSE is less volatile compared to KGS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSE.Check KGS's competition here
LandBridge Company LLC (NYSE: LB)
LSE vs LB Comparison July 2026
Leishen Energy Holding Co., Ltd. (NASDAQ: LSE) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LSE stands at 71.5M. In comparison, LB has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LSE is priced at $4.35 on the NASDAQ, while LB trades at $76.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LSE currently has a P/E ratio of 52.50, whereas LB's P/E ratio is 78.77. In terms of profitability, LSE's ROE is +0.03%, compared to LB's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LSE is more volatile compared to LB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSE.Check LB's competition here
Oceaneering International, Inc. (NYSE: OII)
LSE vs OII Comparison July 2026
Leishen Energy Holding Co., Ltd. (NASDAQ: LSE) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LSE stands at 71.5M. In comparison, OII has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LSE is priced at $4.35 on the NASDAQ, while OII trades at $52.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LSE currently has a P/E ratio of 52.50, whereas OII's P/E ratio is 29.48. In terms of profitability, LSE's ROE is +0.03%, compared to OII's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, LSE is less volatile compared to OII. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSE.Check OII's competition here
ChampionX Corporation (NASDAQ: CHX)
LSE vs CHX Comparison July 2026
Leishen Energy Holding Co., Ltd. (NASDAQ: LSE) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LSE stands at 71.5M. In comparison, CHX has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LSE is priced at $4.35 on the NASDAQ, while CHX trades at $25.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LSE currently has a P/E ratio of 52.50, whereas CHX's P/E ratio is 17.09. In terms of profitability, LSE's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CHX's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LSE is more volatile compared to CHX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSE.Check CHX's competition here
Tidewater Inc. (NYSE: TDW)
LSE vs TDW Comparison July 2026
Leishen Energy Holding Co., Ltd. (NASDAQ: LSE) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LSE stands at 71.5M. In comparison, TDW has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LSE is priced at $4.35 on the NASDAQ, while TDW trades at $78.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LSE currently has a P/E ratio of 52.50, whereas TDW's P/E ratio is 35.54. In terms of profitability, LSE's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TDW's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LSE is more volatile compared to TDW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSE.Check TDW's competition here
Cactus, Inc. (NYSE: WHD)
LSE vs WHD Comparison July 2026
Leishen Energy Holding Co., Ltd. (NASDAQ: LSE) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LSE stands at 71.5M. In comparison, WHD has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LSE is priced at $4.35 on the NASDAQ, while WHD trades at $55.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LSE currently has a P/E ratio of 52.50, whereas WHD's P/E ratio is 20.57. In terms of profitability, LSE's ROE is +0.03%, compared to WHD's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LSE is more volatile compared to WHD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSE.Check WHD's competition here
Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc. (NYSE: SEI)
LSE vs SEI Comparison July 2026
Leishen Energy Holding Co., Ltd. (NASDAQ: LSE) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LSE stands at 71.5M. In comparison, SEI has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LSE is priced at $4.35 on the NASDAQ, while SEI trades at $54.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LSE currently has a P/E ratio of 52.50, whereas SEI's P/E ratio is 37.24. In terms of profitability, LSE's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SEI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LSE is less volatile compared to SEI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSE.Check SEI's competition here
USA Compression Partners, LP (NYSE: USAC)
LSE vs USAC Comparison July 2026
Leishen Energy Holding Co., Ltd. (NASDAQ: LSE) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LSE stands at 71.5M. In comparison, USAC has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LSE is priced at $4.35 on the NASDAQ, while USAC trades at $26.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LSE currently has a P/E ratio of 52.50, whereas USAC's P/E ratio is 27.22. In terms of profitability, LSE's ROE is +0.03%, compared to USAC's ROE of +6.51%. Regarding short-term risk, LSE is more volatile compared to USAC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSE.Check USAC's competition here
Liberty Energy Inc. (NYSE: LBRT)
LSE vs LBRT Comparison July 2026
Leishen Energy Holding Co., Ltd. (NASDAQ: LSE) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LSE stands at 71.5M. In comparison, LBRT has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LSE is priced at $4.35 on the NASDAQ, while LBRT trades at $17.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LSE currently has a P/E ratio of 52.50, whereas LBRT's P/E ratio is 26.30. In terms of profitability, LSE's ROE is +0.03%, compared to LBRT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LSE is less volatile compared to LBRT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSE.Check LBRT's competition here
National Energy Services Reunited Corp. (NASDAQ: NESR)
LSE vs NESR Comparison July 2026
Leishen Energy Holding Co., Ltd. (NASDAQ: LSE) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LSE stands at 71.5M. In comparison, NESR has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LSE is priced at $4.35 on the NASDAQ, while NESR trades at $27.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LSE currently has a P/E ratio of 52.50, whereas NESR's P/E ratio is 29.07. In terms of profitability, LSE's ROE is +0.03%, compared to NESR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LSE is more volatile compared to NESR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSE.Check NESR's competition here
Enerflex Ltd. (NYSE: EFXT)
LSE vs EFXT Comparison July 2026
Leishen Energy Holding Co., Ltd. (NASDAQ: LSE) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LSE stands at 71.5M. In comparison, EFXT has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LSE is priced at $4.35 on the NASDAQ, while EFXT trades at $22.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LSE currently has a P/E ratio of 52.50, whereas EFXT's P/E ratio is 17.00. In terms of profitability, LSE's ROE is +0.03%, compared to EFXT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LSE is more volatile compared to EFXT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSE.Check EFXT's competition here
Tidewater Inc. (AMEX: TDW-WT)
LSE vs TDW-WT Comparison July 2026
Leishen Energy Holding Co., Ltd. (NASDAQ: LSE) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LSE stands at 71.5M. In comparison, TDW-WT has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LSE is priced at $4.35 on the NASDAQ, while TDW-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LSE currently has a P/E ratio of 52.50, whereas TDW-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LSE's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TDW-WT's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LSE is more volatile compared to TDW-WT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSE.Check TDW-WT's competition here
NexTier Oilfield Solutions Inc. (NYSE: NEX)
LSE vs NEX Comparison July 2026
Leishen Energy Holding Co., Ltd. (NASDAQ: LSE) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LSE stands at 71.5M. In comparison, NEX has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LSE is priced at $4.35 on the NASDAQ, while NEX trades at $10.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LSE currently has a P/E ratio of 52.50, whereas NEX's P/E ratio is 3.94. In terms of profitability, LSE's ROE is +0.03%, compared to NEX's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, LSE is more volatile compared to NEX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSE.Check NEX's competition here
EagleRock Land LLC (NYSE: EROK)
LSE vs EROK Comparison July 2026
Leishen Energy Holding Co., Ltd. (NASDAQ: LSE) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LSE stands at 71.5M. In comparison, EROK has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LSE is priced at $4.35 on the NASDAQ, while EROK trades at $22.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LSE currently has a P/E ratio of 52.50, whereas EROK's P/E ratio is 2214.00. In terms of profitability, LSE's ROE is +0.03%, compared to EROK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LSE is more volatile compared to EROK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSE.Check EROK's competition here
Select Water Solutions, Inc. (NYSE: WTTR)
LSE vs WTTR Comparison July 2026
Leishen Energy Holding Co., Ltd. (NASDAQ: LSE) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LSE stands at 71.5M. In comparison, WTTR has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LSE is priced at $4.35 on the NASDAQ, while WTTR trades at $20.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LSE currently has a P/E ratio of 52.50, whereas WTTR's P/E ratio is 97.68. In terms of profitability, LSE's ROE is +0.03%, compared to WTTR's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LSE is more volatile compared to WTTR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSE.Check WTTR's competition here
Innovex International, Inc. (NYSE: INVX)
LSE vs INVX Comparison July 2026
Leishen Energy Holding Co., Ltd. (NASDAQ: LSE) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LSE stands at 71.5M. In comparison, INVX has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LSE is priced at $4.35 on the NASDAQ, while INVX trades at $26.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LSE currently has a P/E ratio of 52.50, whereas INVX's P/E ratio is 26.86. In terms of profitability, LSE's ROE is +0.03%, compared to INVX's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LSE is more volatile compared to INVX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSE.Check INVX's competition here
Flowco Holdings Inc. (NYSE: FLOC)
LSE vs FLOC Comparison July 2026
Leishen Energy Holding Co., Ltd. (NASDAQ: LSE) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LSE stands at 71.5M. In comparison, FLOC has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LSE is priced at $4.35 on the NASDAQ, while FLOC trades at $20.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LSE currently has a P/E ratio of 52.50, whereas FLOC's P/E ratio is 6.58. In terms of profitability, LSE's ROE is +0.03%, compared to FLOC's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LSE is more volatile compared to FLOC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSE.Check FLOC's competition here
Expro Group Holdings N.V. (NYSE: XPRO)
LSE vs XPRO Comparison July 2026
Leishen Energy Holding Co., Ltd. (NASDAQ: LSE) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LSE stands at 71.5M. In comparison, XPRO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LSE is priced at $4.35 on the NASDAQ, while XPRO trades at $15.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LSE currently has a P/E ratio of 52.50, whereas XPRO's P/E ratio is 29.20. In terms of profitability, LSE's ROE is +0.03%, compared to XPRO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LSE is more volatile compared to XPRO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSE.Check XPRO's competition here
WaterBridge Infrastructure LLC (NYSE: WBI)
LSE vs WBI Comparison July 2026
Leishen Energy Holding Co., Ltd. (NASDAQ: LSE) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LSE stands at 71.5M. In comparison, WBI has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LSE is priced at $4.35 on the NASDAQ, while WBI trades at $34.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LSE currently has a P/E ratio of 52.50, whereas WBI's P/E ratio is 607.48. In terms of profitability, LSE's ROE is +0.03%, compared to WBI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LSE is more volatile compared to WBI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSE.Check WBI's competition here
Atlas Energy Solutions Inc. (NYSE: AESI)
LSE vs AESI Comparison July 2026
Leishen Energy Holding Co., Ltd. (NASDAQ: LSE) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LSE stands at 71.5M. In comparison, AESI has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LSE is priced at $4.35 on the NASDAQ, while AESI trades at $11.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LSE currently has a P/E ratio of 52.50, whereas AESI's P/E ratio is -15.83. In terms of profitability, LSE's ROE is +0.03%, compared to AESI's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LSE is less volatile compared to AESI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSE.Check AESI's competition here
Helix Energy Solutions Group, Inc. (NYSE: HLX)
LSE vs HLX Comparison July 2026
Leishen Energy Holding Co., Ltd. (NASDAQ: LSE) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LSE stands at 71.5M. In comparison, HLX has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LSE is priced at $4.35 on the NASDAQ, while HLX trades at $9.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LSE currently has a P/E ratio of 52.50, whereas HLX's P/E ratio is 49.58. In terms of profitability, LSE's ROE is +0.03%, compared to HLX's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LSE is more volatile compared to HLX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSE.Check HLX's competition here
ProPetro Holding Corp. (NYSE: PUMP)
LSE vs PUMP Comparison July 2026
Leishen Energy Holding Co., Ltd. (NASDAQ: LSE) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LSE stands at 71.5M. In comparison, PUMP has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LSE is priced at $4.35 on the NASDAQ, while PUMP trades at $11.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LSE currently has a P/E ratio of 52.50, whereas PUMP's P/E ratio is -107.32. In terms of profitability, LSE's ROE is +0.03%, compared to PUMP's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LSE is less volatile compared to PUMP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSE.Check PUMP's competition here
Bristow Group Inc. (NYSE: VTOL)
LSE vs VTOL Comparison July 2026
Leishen Energy Holding Co., Ltd. (NASDAQ: LSE) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LSE stands at 71.5M. In comparison, VTOL has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LSE is priced at $4.35 on the NASDAQ, while VTOL trades at $45.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LSE currently has a P/E ratio of 52.50, whereas VTOL's P/E ratio is 11.91. In terms of profitability, LSE's ROE is +0.03%, compared to VTOL's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LSE is more volatile compared to VTOL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSE.Check VTOL's competition here
RPC, Inc. (NYSE: RES)
LSE vs RES Comparison July 2026
Leishen Energy Holding Co., Ltd. (NASDAQ: LSE) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LSE stands at 71.5M. In comparison, RES has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LSE is priced at $4.35 on the NASDAQ, while RES trades at $5.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LSE currently has a P/E ratio of 52.50, whereas RES's P/E ratio is 23.40. In terms of profitability, LSE's ROE is +0.03%, compared to RES's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LSE is more volatile compared to RES. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSE.Check RES's competition here
TETRA Technologies, Inc. (NYSE: TTI)
LSE vs TTI Comparison July 2026
Leishen Energy Holding Co., Ltd. (NASDAQ: LSE) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LSE stands at 71.5M. In comparison, TTI has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LSE is priced at $4.35 on the NASDAQ, while TTI trades at $8.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LSE currently has a P/E ratio of 52.50, whereas TTI's P/E ratio is 39.57. In terms of profitability, LSE's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TTI's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LSE is more volatile compared to TTI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSE.Check TTI's competition here
U.S. Silica Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: SLCA)
LSE vs SLCA Comparison July 2026
Leishen Energy Holding Co., Ltd. (NASDAQ: LSE) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LSE stands at 71.5M. In comparison, SLCA has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LSE is priced at $4.35 on the NASDAQ, while SLCA trades at $15.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LSE currently has a P/E ratio of 52.50, whereas SLCA's P/E ratio is 10.54. In terms of profitability, LSE's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SLCA's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LSE is more volatile compared to SLCA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSE.Check SLCA's competition here
ProFrac Holding Corp. (NASDAQ: PFHC)
LSE vs PFHC Comparison July 2026
Leishen Energy Holding Co., Ltd. (NASDAQ: LSE) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LSE stands at 71.5M. In comparison, PFHC has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LSE is priced at $4.35 on the NASDAQ, while PFHC trades at $22.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LSE currently has a P/E ratio of 52.50, whereas PFHC's P/E ratio is 105.14. In terms of profitability, LSE's ROE is +0.03%, compared to PFHC's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, LSE is more volatile compared to PFHC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSE.Check PFHC's competition here
MRC Global Inc. (NYSE: MRC)
LSE vs MRC Comparison July 2026
Leishen Energy Holding Co., Ltd. (NASDAQ: LSE) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LSE stands at 71.5M. In comparison, MRC has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LSE is priced at $4.35 on the NASDAQ, while MRC trades at $13.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LSE currently has a P/E ratio of 52.50, whereas MRC's P/E ratio is 59.91. In terms of profitability, LSE's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MRC's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LSE is less volatile compared to MRC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSE.Check MRC's competition here
HMH Holding Inc. Class A Common Stock (NASDAQ: HMH)
LSE vs HMH Comparison July 2026
Leishen Energy Holding Co., Ltd. (NASDAQ: LSE) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LSE stands at 71.5M. In comparison, HMH has a market cap of 961.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LSE is priced at $4.35 on the NASDAQ, while HMH trades at $21.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LSE currently has a P/E ratio of 52.50, whereas HMH's P/E ratio is 86.11. In terms of profitability, LSE's ROE is +0.03%, compared to HMH's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LSE is more volatile compared to HMH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSE.Check HMH's competition here
Flotek Industries, Inc. (NYSE: FTK)
LSE vs FTK Comparison July 2026
Leishen Energy Holding Co., Ltd. (NASDAQ: LSE) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LSE stands at 71.5M. In comparison, FTK has a market cap of 777.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LSE is priced at $4.35 on the NASDAQ, while FTK trades at $25.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LSE currently has a P/E ratio of 52.50, whereas FTK's P/E ratio is 46.05. In terms of profitability, LSE's ROE is +0.03%, compared to FTK's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, LSE is more volatile compared to FTK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSE.Check FTK's competition here
ProFrac Holding Corp. (NASDAQ: ACDC)
LSE vs ACDC Comparison July 2026
Leishen Energy Holding Co., Ltd. (NASDAQ: LSE) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LSE stands at 71.5M. In comparison, ACDC has a market cap of 770.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LSE is priced at $4.35 on the NASDAQ, while ACDC trades at $4.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LSE currently has a P/E ratio of 52.50, whereas ACDC's P/E ratio is -1.89. In terms of profitability, LSE's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ACDC's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, LSE is less volatile compared to ACDC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSE.Check ACDC's competition here
Valaris Limited Warrants (NYSE: VAL-WT)
LSE vs VAL-WT Comparison July 2026
Leishen Energy Holding Co., Ltd. (NASDAQ: LSE) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LSE stands at 71.5M. In comparison, VAL-WT has a market cap of 750.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LSE is priced at $4.35 on the NASDAQ, while VAL-WT trades at $10.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LSE currently has a P/E ratio of 52.50, whereas VAL-WT's P/E ratio is 0.49. In terms of profitability, LSE's ROE is +0.03%, compared to VAL-WT's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, LSE is more volatile compared to VAL-WT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSE.Check VAL-WT's competition here
National Energy Services Reunited Corp. (NASDAQ: NESRW)
LSE vs NESRW Comparison July 2026
Leishen Energy Holding Co., Ltd. (NASDAQ: LSE) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LSE stands at 71.5M. In comparison, NESRW has a market cap of 709.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LSE is priced at $4.35 on the NASDAQ, while NESRW trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LSE currently has a P/E ratio of 52.50, whereas NESRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LSE's ROE is +0.03%, compared to NESRW's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LSE is less volatile compared to NESRW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSE.Check NESRW's competition here
Forum Energy Technologies, Inc. (NYSE: FET)
LSE vs FET Comparison July 2026
Leishen Energy Holding Co., Ltd. (NASDAQ: LSE) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LSE stands at 71.5M. In comparison, FET has a market cap of 654.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LSE is priced at $4.35 on the NASDAQ, while FET trades at $57.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LSE currently has a P/E ratio of 52.50, whereas FET's P/E ratio is 55.12. In terms of profitability, LSE's ROE is +0.03%, compared to FET's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LSE is more volatile compared to FET. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSE.Check FET's competition here
Newpark Resources, Inc. (NYSE: NR)
LSE vs NR Comparison July 2026
Leishen Energy Holding Co., Ltd. (NASDAQ: LSE) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LSE stands at 71.5M. In comparison, NR has a market cap of 627.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LSE is priced at $4.35 on the NASDAQ, while NR trades at $7.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LSE currently has a P/E ratio of 52.50, whereas NR's P/E ratio is 19.08. In terms of profitability, LSE's ROE is +0.03%, compared to NR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LSE is less volatile compared to NR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSE.Check NR's competition here
Core Laboratories N.V. (NYSE: CLB)
LSE vs CLB Comparison July 2026
Leishen Energy Holding Co., Ltd. (NASDAQ: LSE) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LSE stands at 71.5M. In comparison, CLB has a market cap of 538.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LSE is priced at $4.35 on the NASDAQ, while CLB trades at $11.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LSE currently has a P/E ratio of 52.50, whereas CLB's P/E ratio is 17.19. In terms of profitability, LSE's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CLB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LSE is more volatile compared to CLB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSE.Check CLB's competition here
Dril-Quip, Inc. (NYSE: DRQ)
LSE vs DRQ Comparison July 2026
Leishen Energy Holding Co., Ltd. (NASDAQ: LSE) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LSE stands at 71.5M. In comparison, DRQ has a market cap of 530.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LSE is priced at $4.35 on the NASDAQ, while DRQ trades at $15.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LSE currently has a P/E ratio of 52.50, whereas DRQ's P/E ratio is -19.76. In terms of profitability, LSE's ROE is +0.03%, compared to DRQ's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LSE is more volatile compared to DRQ. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSE.Check DRQ's competition here
Nine Energy Service, Inc. (AMEX: NINE)
LSE vs NINE Comparison July 2026
Leishen Energy Holding Co., Ltd. (NASDAQ: LSE) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LSE stands at 71.5M. In comparison, NINE has a market cap of 525.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LSE is priced at $4.35 on the NASDAQ, while NINE trades at $12.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LSE currently has a P/E ratio of 52.50, whereas NINE's P/E ratio is 5.80. In terms of profitability, LSE's ROE is +0.03%, compared to NINE's ROE of -1.57%. Regarding short-term risk, LSE is less volatile compared to NINE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSE.Check NINE's competition here
Oil States International, Inc. (NYSE: OIS)
LSE vs OIS Comparison July 2026
Leishen Energy Holding Co., Ltd. (NASDAQ: LSE) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LSE stands at 71.5M. In comparison, OIS has a market cap of 522.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LSE is priced at $4.35 on the NASDAQ, while OIS trades at $8.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LSE currently has a P/E ratio of 52.50, whereas OIS's P/E ratio is 22.26. In terms of profitability, LSE's ROE is +0.03%, compared to OIS's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LSE is more volatile compared to OIS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSE.Check OIS's competition here
Solaris Oilfield Infrastructure, Inc. (NYSE: SOI)
LSE vs SOI Comparison July 2026
Leishen Energy Holding Co., Ltd. (NASDAQ: LSE) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LSE stands at 71.5M. In comparison, SOI has a market cap of 498.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LSE is priced at $4.35 on the NASDAQ, while SOI trades at $11.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LSE currently has a P/E ratio of 52.50, whereas SOI's P/E ratio is 17.15. In terms of profitability, LSE's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SOI's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, LSE is more volatile compared to SOI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSE.Check SOI's competition here
Natural Gas Services Group, Inc. (NYSE: NGS)
LSE vs NGS Comparison July 2026
Leishen Energy Holding Co., Ltd. (NASDAQ: LSE) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LSE stands at 71.5M. In comparison, NGS has a market cap of 460.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LSE is priced at $4.35 on the NASDAQ, while NGS trades at $36.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LSE currently has a P/E ratio of 52.50, whereas NGS's P/E ratio is 21.18. In terms of profitability, LSE's ROE is +0.03%, compared to NGS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LSE is less volatile compared to NGS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSE.Check NGS's competition here
North American Construction Group Ltd. (NYSE: NOA)
LSE vs NOA Comparison July 2026
Leishen Energy Holding Co., Ltd. (NASDAQ: LSE) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LSE stands at 71.5M. In comparison, NOA has a market cap of 377M. Regarding current trading prices, LSE is priced at $4.35 on the NASDAQ, while NOA trades at $13.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LSE currently has a P/E ratio of 52.50, whereas NOA's P/E ratio is 25.60. In terms of profitability, LSE's ROE is +0.03%, compared to NOA's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LSE is more volatile compared to NOA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSE.Check NOA's competition here
Ranger Energy Services, Inc. (NYSE: RNGR)
LSE vs RNGR Comparison July 2026
Leishen Energy Holding Co., Ltd. (NASDAQ: LSE) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LSE stands at 71.5M. In comparison, RNGR has a market cap of 372.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LSE is priced at $4.35 on the NASDAQ, while RNGR trades at $15.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LSE currently has a P/E ratio of 52.50, whereas RNGR's P/E ratio is 24.90. In terms of profitability, LSE's ROE is +0.03%, compared to RNGR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LSE is more volatile compared to RNGR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSE.Check RNGR's competition here
CSI Compressco LP (NASDAQ: CCLP)
LSE vs CCLP Comparison July 2026
Leishen Energy Holding Co., Ltd. (NASDAQ: LSE) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LSE stands at 71.5M. In comparison, CCLP has a market cap of 344.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LSE is priced at $4.35 on the NASDAQ, while CCLP trades at $2.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LSE currently has a P/E ratio of 52.50, whereas CCLP's P/E ratio is -34.57. In terms of profitability, LSE's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CCLP's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, LSE is more volatile compared to CCLP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSE.Check CCLP's competition here
Smart Sand, Inc. (NASDAQ: SND)
LSE vs SND Comparison July 2026
Leishen Energy Holding Co., Ltd. (NASDAQ: LSE) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LSE stands at 71.5M. In comparison, SND has a market cap of 200.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LSE is priced at $4.35 on the NASDAQ, while SND trades at $4.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LSE currently has a P/E ratio of 52.50, whereas SND's P/E ratio is -895435701911390336.00. In terms of profitability, LSE's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SND's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LSE is more volatile compared to SND. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSE.Check SND's competition here
OMS Energy Technologies Inc. (NASDAQ: OMSE)
LSE vs OMSE Comparison July 2026
Leishen Energy Holding Co., Ltd. (NASDAQ: LSE) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LSE stands at 71.5M. In comparison, OMSE has a market cap of 179.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LSE is priced at $4.35 on the NASDAQ, while OMSE trades at $4.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LSE currently has a P/E ratio of 52.50, whereas OMSE's P/E ratio is 9.84. In terms of profitability, LSE's ROE is +0.03%, compared to OMSE's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LSE is more volatile compared to OMSE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSE.Check OMSE's competition here
Dawson Geophysical Company (NASDAQ: DWSN)
LSE vs DWSN Comparison July 2026
Leishen Energy Holding Co., Ltd. (NASDAQ: LSE) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LSE stands at 71.5M. In comparison, DWSN has a market cap of 154.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LSE is priced at $4.35 on the NASDAQ, while DWSN trades at $4.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LSE currently has a P/E ratio of 52.50, whereas DWSN's P/E ratio is 33.20. In terms of profitability, LSE's ROE is +0.03%, compared to DWSN's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, LSE is more volatile compared to DWSN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSE.Check DWSN's competition here
NCS Multistage Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: NCSM)
LSE vs NCSM Comparison July 2026
Leishen Energy Holding Co., Ltd. (NASDAQ: LSE) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LSE stands at 71.5M. In comparison, NCSM has a market cap of 123.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LSE is priced at $4.35 on the NASDAQ, while NCSM trades at $47.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LSE currently has a P/E ratio of 52.50, whereas NCSM's P/E ratio is 14.86. In terms of profitability, LSE's ROE is +0.03%, compared to NCSM's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LSE is more volatile compared to NCSM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSE.Check NCSM's competition here
Profire Energy, Inc. (NASDAQ: PFIE)
LSE vs PFIE Comparison July 2026
Leishen Energy Holding Co., Ltd. (NASDAQ: LSE) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LSE stands at 71.5M. In comparison, PFIE has a market cap of 117.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LSE is priced at $4.35 on the NASDAQ, while PFIE trades at $2.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LSE currently has a P/E ratio of 52.50, whereas PFIE's P/E ratio is 13.37. In terms of profitability, LSE's ROE is +0.03%, compared to PFIE's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LSE is more volatile compared to PFIE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSE.Check PFIE's competition here
Geospace Technologies Corporation (NASDAQ: GEOS)
LSE vs GEOS Comparison July 2026
Leishen Energy Holding Co., Ltd. (NASDAQ: LSE) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LSE stands at 71.5M. In comparison, GEOS has a market cap of 91.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LSE is priced at $4.35 on the NASDAQ, while GEOS trades at $7.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LSE currently has a P/E ratio of 52.50, whereas GEOS's P/E ratio is -3.12. In terms of profitability, LSE's ROE is +0.03%, compared to GEOS's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LSE is more volatile compared to GEOS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSE.Check GEOS's competition here
STAK Inc. Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: STAK)
LSE vs STAK Comparison July 2026
Leishen Energy Holding Co., Ltd. (NASDAQ: LSE) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LSE stands at 71.5M. In comparison, STAK has a market cap of 86.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LSE is priced at $4.35 on the NASDAQ, while STAK trades at $9.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LSE currently has a P/E ratio of 52.50, whereas STAK's P/E ratio is -15.22. In terms of profitability, LSE's ROE is +0.03%, compared to STAK's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, LSE is less volatile compared to STAK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSE.Check STAK's competition here
Drilling Tools International Corp. (NASDAQ: DTI)
LSE vs DTI Comparison July 2026
Leishen Energy Holding Co., Ltd. (NASDAQ: LSE) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LSE stands at 71.5M. In comparison, DTI has a market cap of 79.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LSE is priced at $4.35 on the NASDAQ, while DTI trades at $2.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LSE currently has a P/E ratio of 52.50, whereas DTI's P/E ratio is 227.00. In terms of profitability, LSE's ROE is +0.03%, compared to DTI's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LSE is more volatile compared to DTI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSE.Check DTI's competition here
KLX Energy Services Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: KLXE)
LSE vs KLXE Comparison July 2026
Leishen Energy Holding Co., Ltd. (NASDAQ: LSE) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LSE stands at 71.5M. In comparison, KLXE has a market cap of 43.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LSE is priced at $4.35 on the NASDAQ, while KLXE trades at $2.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LSE currently has a P/E ratio of 52.50, whereas KLXE's P/E ratio is -0.59. In terms of profitability, LSE's ROE is +0.03%, compared to KLXE's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LSE is less volatile compared to KLXE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSE.Check KLXE's competition here
Superior Drilling Products, Inc. (AMEX: SDPI)
LSE vs SDPI Comparison July 2026
Leishen Energy Holding Co., Ltd. (NASDAQ: LSE) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LSE stands at 71.5M. In comparison, SDPI has a market cap of 30.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LSE is priced at $4.35 on the NASDAQ, while SDPI trades at $1.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LSE currently has a P/E ratio of 52.50, whereas SDPI's P/E ratio is 7.21. In terms of profitability, LSE's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SDPI's ROE of +0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, LSE is more volatile compared to SDPI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSE.Check SDPI's competition here
Recon Technology, Ltd. (NASDAQ: RCON)
LSE vs RCON Comparison July 2026
Leishen Energy Holding Co., Ltd. (NASDAQ: LSE) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LSE stands at 71.5M. In comparison, RCON has a market cap of 14.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LSE is priced at $4.35 on the NASDAQ, while RCON trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LSE currently has a P/E ratio of 52.50, whereas RCON's P/E ratio is -0.52. In terms of profitability, LSE's ROE is +0.03%, compared to RCON's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LSE is less volatile compared to RCON. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSE.Check RCON's competition here
Tidewater Inc. Series B (NYSE: TDW-WTB)
LSE vs TDW-WTB Comparison July 2026
Leishen Energy Holding Co., Ltd. (NASDAQ: LSE) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LSE stands at 71.5M. In comparison, TDW-WTB has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LSE is priced at $4.35 on the NASDAQ, while TDW-WTB trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LSE currently has a P/E ratio of 52.50, whereas TDW-WTB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LSE's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TDW-WTB's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LSE is less volatile compared to TDW-WTB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSE.Check TDW-WTB's competition here
Gulfmark Offshore, Inc. (NYSE: GLF)
LSE vs GLF Comparison July 2026
Leishen Energy Holding Co., Ltd. (NASDAQ: LSE) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LSE stands at 71.5M. In comparison, GLF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LSE is priced at $4.35 on the NASDAQ, while GLF trades at $28.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LSE currently has a P/E ratio of 52.50, whereas GLF's P/E ratio is 1.25. In terms of profitability, LSE's ROE is +0.03%, compared to GLF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LSE is less volatile compared to GLF. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSE.Check GLF's competition here
FTS International, Inc. (NYSE: FTSI)
LSE vs FTSI Comparison July 2026
Leishen Energy Holding Co., Ltd. (NASDAQ: LSE) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LSE stands at 71.5M. In comparison, FTSI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LSE is priced at $4.35 on the NASDAQ, while FTSI trades at $26.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LSE currently has a P/E ratio of 52.50, whereas FTSI's P/E ratio is 4.67. In terms of profitability, LSE's ROE is +0.03%, compared to FTSI's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LSE is less volatile compared to FTSI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSE.Check FTSI's competition here
Tidewater Inc. Series A (NYSE: TDW-WTA)
LSE vs TDW-WTA Comparison July 2026
Leishen Energy Holding Co., Ltd. (NASDAQ: LSE) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LSE stands at 71.5M. In comparison, TDW-WTA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LSE is priced at $4.35 on the NASDAQ, while TDW-WTA trades at $2.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LSE currently has a P/E ratio of 52.50, whereas TDW-WTA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LSE's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TDW-WTA's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LSE is less volatile compared to TDW-WTA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSE.Check TDW-WTA's competition here
U.S. Well Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: USWS)
LSE vs USWS Comparison July 2026
Leishen Energy Holding Co., Ltd. (NASDAQ: LSE) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LSE stands at 71.5M. In comparison, USWS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LSE is priced at $4.35 on the NASDAQ, while USWS trades at $7.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LSE currently has a P/E ratio of 52.50, whereas USWS's P/E ratio is -3.94. In terms of profitability, LSE's ROE is +0.03%, compared to USWS's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LSE is more volatile compared to USWS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSE.Check USWS's competition here
U.S. Well Services, Inc. WT EXP 031524 (NASDAQ: USWSW)
LSE vs USWSW Comparison July 2026
Leishen Energy Holding Co., Ltd. (NASDAQ: LSE) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LSE stands at 71.5M. In comparison, USWSW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LSE is priced at $4.35 on the NASDAQ, while USWSW trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LSE currently has a P/E ratio of 52.50, whereas USWSW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LSE's ROE is +0.03%, compared to USWSW's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LSE is less volatile compared to USWSW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSE.Check USWSW's competition here
Cypress Environmental Partners, L.P. (NYSE: CELP)
LSE vs CELP Comparison July 2026
Leishen Energy Holding Co., Ltd. (NASDAQ: LSE) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LSE stands at 71.5M. In comparison, CELP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LSE is priced at $4.35 on the NASDAQ, while CELP trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LSE currently has a P/E ratio of 52.50, whereas CELP's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, LSE's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CELP's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LSE is less volatile compared to CELP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSE.Check CELP's competition here
ION Geophysical Corporation (NYSE: IO)
LSE vs IO Comparison July 2026
Leishen Energy Holding Co., Ltd. (NASDAQ: LSE) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LSE stands at 71.5M. In comparison, IO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LSE is priced at $4.35 on the NASDAQ, while IO trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LSE currently has a P/E ratio of 52.50, whereas IO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LSE's ROE is +0.03%, compared to IO's ROE of +0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, LSE is less volatile compared to IO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSE.Check IO's competition here
Exterran Corporation (NYSE: EXTN)
LSE vs EXTN Comparison July 2026
Leishen Energy Holding Co., Ltd. (NASDAQ: LSE) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LSE stands at 71.5M. In comparison, EXTN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LSE is priced at $4.35 on the NASDAQ, while EXTN trades at $4.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LSE currently has a P/E ratio of 52.50, whereas EXTN's P/E ratio is -1.35. In terms of profitability, LSE's ROE is +0.03%, compared to EXTN's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, LSE is more volatile compared to EXTN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSE.Check EXTN's competition here
NuStar Energy L.P. (NYSE: VLI)
LSE vs VLI Comparison July 2026
Leishen Energy Holding Co., Ltd. (NASDAQ: LSE) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LSE stands at 71.5M. In comparison, VLI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LSE is priced at $4.35 on the NASDAQ, while VLI trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LSE currently has a P/E ratio of 52.50, whereas VLI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LSE's ROE is +0.03%, compared to VLI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LSE is less volatile compared to VLI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSE.Check VLI's competition here
Hongli Clean Energy Technologie (NASDAQ: CETC)
LSE vs CETC Comparison July 2026
Leishen Energy Holding Co., Ltd. (NASDAQ: LSE) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LSE stands at 71.5M. In comparison, CETC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LSE is priced at $4.35 on the NASDAQ, while CETC trades at $4.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LSE currently has a P/E ratio of 52.50, whereas CETC's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, LSE's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CETC's ROE of -1.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LSE is less volatile compared to CETC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSE.Check CETC's competition here
Archrock Partners, L.P. repres (NASDAQ: APLP)
LSE vs APLP Comparison July 2026
Leishen Energy Holding Co., Ltd. (NASDAQ: LSE) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LSE stands at 71.5M. In comparison, APLP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LSE is priced at $4.35 on the NASDAQ, while APLP trades at $15.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LSE currently has a P/E ratio of 52.50, whereas APLP's P/E ratio is 30.00. In terms of profitability, LSE's ROE is +0.03%, compared to APLP's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LSE is more volatile compared to APLP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSE.Check APLP's competition here
ProFrac Holding Corp. (NASDAQ: ACDCW)
LSE vs ACDCW Comparison July 2026
Leishen Energy Holding Co., Ltd. (NASDAQ: LSE) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LSE stands at 71.5M. In comparison, ACDCW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LSE is priced at $4.35 on the NASDAQ, while ACDCW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LSE currently has a P/E ratio of 52.50, whereas ACDCW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LSE's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ACDCW's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, LSE is less volatile compared to ACDCW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSE.Check ACDCW's competition here