STAK Inc. Ordinary Shares
STAK Inc. Ordinary Shares (STAK) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (STAK) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Oil & Gas Equipment & Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| STAK | $0.87 | +4.27% | 9.3M | -1.63 | -$0.53 | N/A |
| SLB | $56.15 | +2.58% | 84.3B | 23.89 | $2.35 | +2.05% |
| BKR | $68.94 | +6.90% | 68.4B | 22.03 | $3.13 | +1.32% |
| TS | $63.29 | +1.05% | 34B | 17.29 | $3.66 | +2.69% |
| HAL | $40.36 | +1.78% | 33.7B | 22.28 | $1.81 | +1.69% |
| FTI | $74.76 | +3.20% | 29.9B | 32.51 | $2.30 | +0.27% |
| WFRD | $108.54 | +5.45% | 7.8B | 16.99 | $6.39 | +0.94% |
| NOV | $20.50 | +1.38% | 7.4B | 52.54 | $0.39 | +2.57% |
| AROC | $37.33 | +3.15% | 6.5B | 20.39 | $1.83 | +2.22% |
| VAL | $91.19 | +0.95% | 6.3B | 6.58 | $13.86 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
STAK vs SLB Comparison April 2026
STAK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAK stands at 9.3M. In comparison, SLB has a market cap of 84.3B. Regarding current trading prices, STAK is priced at $0.87, while SLB trades at $56.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.63, whereas SLB's P/E ratio is 23.89. In terms of profitability, STAK's ROE is -0.49%, compared to SLB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, STAK is more volatile compared to SLB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAK.Check SLB's competition here
STAK vs BKR Comparison April 2026
STAK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAK stands at 9.3M. In comparison, BKR has a market cap of 68.4B. Regarding current trading prices, STAK is priced at $0.87, while BKR trades at $68.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.63, whereas BKR's P/E ratio is 22.03. In terms of profitability, STAK's ROE is -0.49%, compared to BKR's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, STAK is more volatile compared to BKR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAK.Check BKR's competition here
STAK vs TS Comparison April 2026
STAK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAK stands at 9.3M. In comparison, TS has a market cap of 34B. Regarding current trading prices, STAK is priced at $0.87, while TS trades at $63.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.63, whereas TS's P/E ratio is 17.29. In terms of profitability, STAK's ROE is -0.49%, compared to TS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, STAK is more volatile compared to TS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAK.Check TS's competition here
STAK vs HAL Comparison April 2026
STAK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAK stands at 9.3M. In comparison, HAL has a market cap of 33.7B. Regarding current trading prices, STAK is priced at $0.87, while HAL trades at $40.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.63, whereas HAL's P/E ratio is 22.28. In terms of profitability, STAK's ROE is -0.49%, compared to HAL's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, STAK is more volatile compared to HAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAK.Check HAL's competition here
STAK vs FTI Comparison April 2026
STAK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAK stands at 9.3M. In comparison, FTI has a market cap of 29.9B. Regarding current trading prices, STAK is priced at $0.87, while FTI trades at $74.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.63, whereas FTI's P/E ratio is 32.51. In terms of profitability, STAK's ROE is -0.49%, compared to FTI's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, STAK is more volatile compared to FTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAK.Check FTI's competition here
STAK vs WFRD Comparison April 2026
STAK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAK stands at 9.3M. In comparison, WFRD has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, STAK is priced at $0.87, while WFRD trades at $108.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.63, whereas WFRD's P/E ratio is 16.99. In terms of profitability, STAK's ROE is -0.49%, compared to WFRD's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, STAK is more volatile compared to WFRD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAK.Check WFRD's competition here
STAK vs NOV Comparison April 2026
STAK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAK stands at 9.3M. In comparison, NOV has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, STAK is priced at $0.87, while NOV trades at $20.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.63, whereas NOV's P/E ratio is 52.54. In terms of profitability, STAK's ROE is -0.49%, compared to NOV's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, STAK is more volatile compared to NOV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAK.Check NOV's competition here
STAK vs AROC Comparison April 2026
STAK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAK stands at 9.3M. In comparison, AROC has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, STAK is priced at $0.87, while AROC trades at $37.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.63, whereas AROC's P/E ratio is 20.39. In terms of profitability, STAK's ROE is -0.49%, compared to AROC's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, STAK is more volatile compared to AROC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAK.Check AROC's competition here
STAK vs VAL Comparison April 2026
STAK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAK stands at 9.3M. In comparison, VAL has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, STAK is priced at $0.87, while VAL trades at $91.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.63, whereas VAL's P/E ratio is 6.58. In terms of profitability, STAK's ROE is -0.49%, compared to VAL's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, STAK is more volatile compared to VAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAK.Check VAL's competition here
STAK vs KGS Comparison April 2026
STAK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAK stands at 9.3M. In comparison, KGS has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, STAK is priced at $0.87, while KGS trades at $65.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.63, whereas KGS's P/E ratio is 74.16. In terms of profitability, STAK's ROE is -0.49%, compared to KGS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, STAK is more volatile compared to KGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAK.Check KGS's competition here
STAK vs LB Comparison April 2026
STAK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAK stands at 9.3M. In comparison, LB has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, STAK is priced at $0.87, while LB trades at $68.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.63, whereas LB's P/E ratio is 72.65. In terms of profitability, STAK's ROE is -0.49%, compared to LB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, STAK is more volatile compared to LB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAK.Check LB's competition here
STAK vs LBRT Comparison April 2026
STAK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAK stands at 9.3M. In comparison, LBRT has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, STAK is priced at $0.87, while LBRT trades at $32.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.63, whereas LBRT's P/E ratio is 35.97. In terms of profitability, STAK's ROE is -0.49%, compared to LBRT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, STAK is more volatile compared to LBRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAK.Check LBRT's competition here
STAK vs SEI Comparison April 2026
STAK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAK stands at 9.3M. In comparison, SEI has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, STAK is priced at $0.87, while SEI trades at $72.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.63, whereas SEI's P/E ratio is 109.65. In terms of profitability, STAK's ROE is -0.49%, compared to SEI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, STAK is more volatile compared to SEI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAK.Check SEI's competition here
STAK vs CHX Comparison April 2026
STAK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAK stands at 9.3M. In comparison, CHX has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, STAK is priced at $0.87, while CHX trades at $25.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.63, whereas CHX's P/E ratio is 17.09. In terms of profitability, STAK's ROE is -0.49%, compared to CHX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, STAK is more volatile compared to CHX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAK.Check CHX's competition here
STAK vs TDW Comparison April 2026
STAK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAK stands at 9.3M. In comparison, TDW has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, STAK is priced at $0.87, while TDW trades at $88.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.63, whereas TDW's P/E ratio is 13.34. In terms of profitability, STAK's ROE is -0.49%, compared to TDW's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, STAK is more volatile compared to TDW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAK.Check TDW's competition here
STAK vs WHD Comparison April 2026
STAK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAK stands at 9.3M. In comparison, WHD has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, STAK is priced at $0.87, while WHD trades at $56.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.63, whereas WHD's P/E ratio is 23.56. In terms of profitability, STAK's ROE is -0.49%, compared to WHD's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, STAK is more volatile compared to WHD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAK.Check WHD's competition here
STAK vs OII Comparison April 2026
STAK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAK stands at 9.3M. In comparison, OII has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, STAK is priced at $0.87, while OII trades at $37.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.63, whereas OII's P/E ratio is 11.12. In terms of profitability, STAK's ROE is -0.49%, compared to OII's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, STAK is more volatile compared to OII. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAK.Check OII's competition here
STAK vs USAC Comparison April 2026
STAK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAK stands at 9.3M. In comparison, USAC has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, STAK is priced at $0.87, while USAC trades at $27.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.63, whereas USAC's P/E ratio is 32.38. In terms of profitability, STAK's ROE is -0.49%, compared to USAC's ROE of -1.79%. Regarding short-term risk, STAK is more volatile compared to USAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAK.Check USAC's competition here
STAK vs EFXT Comparison April 2026
STAK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAK stands at 9.3M. In comparison, EFXT has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, STAK is priced at $0.87, while EFXT trades at $25.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.63, whereas EFXT's P/E ratio is 49.38. In terms of profitability, STAK's ROE is -0.49%, compared to EFXT's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, STAK is more volatile compared to EFXT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAK.Check EFXT's competition here
STAK vs CAM Comparison April 2026
STAK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAK stands at 9.3M. In comparison, CAM has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, STAK is priced at $0.87, while CAM trades at $66.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.63, whereas CAM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STAK's ROE is -0.49%, compared to CAM's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, STAK is more volatile compared to CAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAK.Check CAM's competition here
STAK vs TDW-WT Comparison April 2026
STAK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAK stands at 9.3M. In comparison, TDW-WT has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, STAK is priced at $0.87, while TDW-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.63, whereas TDW-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STAK's ROE is -0.49%, compared to TDW-WT's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, STAK is more volatile compared to TDW-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAK.Check TDW-WT's competition here
STAK vs NESR Comparison April 2026
STAK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAK stands at 9.3M. In comparison, NESR has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, STAK is priced at $0.87, while NESR trades at $24.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.63, whereas NESR's P/E ratio is 47.00. In terms of profitability, STAK's ROE is -0.49%, compared to NESR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, STAK is more volatile compared to NESR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAK.Check NESR's competition here
STAK vs NEX Comparison April 2026
STAK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAK stands at 9.3M. In comparison, NEX has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, STAK is priced at $0.87, while NEX trades at $10.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.63, whereas NEX's P/E ratio is 3.94. In terms of profitability, STAK's ROE is -0.49%, compared to NEX's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, STAK is more volatile compared to NEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAK.Check NEX's competition here
STAK vs FLOC Comparison April 2026
STAK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAK stands at 9.3M. In comparison, FLOC has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, STAK is priced at $0.87, while FLOC trades at $24.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.63, whereas FLOC's P/E ratio is 19.40. In terms of profitability, STAK's ROE is -0.49%, compared to FLOC's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, STAK is more volatile compared to FLOC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAK.Check FLOC's competition here
STAK vs PUMP Comparison April 2026
STAK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAK stands at 9.3M. In comparison, PUMP has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, STAK is priced at $0.87, while PUMP trades at $17.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.63, whereas PUMP's P/E ratio is 1700.50. In terms of profitability, STAK's ROE is -0.49%, compared to PUMP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, STAK is more volatile compared to PUMP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAK.Check PUMP's competition here
STAK vs AESI Comparison April 2026
STAK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAK stands at 9.3M. In comparison, AESI has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, STAK is priced at $0.87, while AESI trades at $16.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.63, whereas AESI's P/E ratio is -39.76. In terms of profitability, STAK's ROE is -0.49%, compared to AESI's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, STAK is more volatile compared to AESI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAK.Check AESI's competition here
STAK vs XPRO Comparison April 2026
STAK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAK stands at 9.3M. In comparison, XPRO has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, STAK is priced at $0.87, while XPRO trades at $17.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.63, whereas XPRO's P/E ratio is 39.44. In terms of profitability, STAK's ROE is -0.49%, compared to XPRO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, STAK is more volatile compared to XPRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAK.Check XPRO's competition here
STAK vs INVX Comparison April 2026
STAK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAK stands at 9.3M. In comparison, INVX has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, STAK is priced at $0.87, while INVX trades at $27.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.63, whereas INVX's P/E ratio is 23.26. In terms of profitability, STAK's ROE is -0.49%, compared to INVX's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, STAK is more volatile compared to INVX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAK.Check INVX's competition here
STAK vs RES Comparison April 2026
STAK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAK stands at 9.3M. In comparison, RES has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, STAK is priced at $0.87, while RES trades at $8.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.63, whereas RES's P/E ratio is 53.37. In terms of profitability, STAK's ROE is -0.49%, compared to RES's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, STAK is more volatile compared to RES. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAK.Check RES's competition here
STAK vs DNOW Comparison April 2026
STAK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAK stands at 9.3M. In comparison, DNOW has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, STAK is priced at $0.87, while DNOW trades at $12.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.63, whereas DNOW's P/E ratio is -16.72. In terms of profitability, STAK's ROE is -0.49%, compared to DNOW's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, STAK is more volatile compared to DNOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAK.Check DNOW's competition here
STAK vs HLX Comparison April 2026
STAK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAK stands at 9.3M. In comparison, HLX has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, STAK is priced at $0.87, while HLX trades at $9.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.63, whereas HLX's P/E ratio is 99.00. In terms of profitability, STAK's ROE is -0.49%, compared to HLX's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, STAK is more volatile compared to HLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAK.Check HLX's competition here
STAK vs VTOL Comparison April 2026
STAK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAK stands at 9.3M. In comparison, VTOL has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, STAK is priced at $0.87, while VTOL trades at $48.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.63, whereas VTOL's P/E ratio is 11.25. In terms of profitability, STAK's ROE is -0.49%, compared to VTOL's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, STAK is more volatile compared to VTOL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAK.Check VTOL's competition here
STAK vs ACDC Comparison April 2026
STAK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAK stands at 9.3M. In comparison, ACDC has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, STAK is priced at $0.87, while ACDC trades at $7.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.63, whereas ACDC's P/E ratio is -3.32. In terms of profitability, STAK's ROE is -0.49%, compared to ACDC's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, STAK is more volatile compared to ACDC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAK.Check ACDC's competition here
STAK vs TTI Comparison April 2026
STAK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAK stands at 9.3M. In comparison, TTI has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, STAK is priced at $0.87, while TTI trades at $9.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.63, whereas TTI's P/E ratio is 323.17. In terms of profitability, STAK's ROE is -0.49%, compared to TTI's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, STAK is more volatile compared to TTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAK.Check TTI's competition here
STAK vs NPKI Comparison April 2026
STAK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAK stands at 9.3M. In comparison, NPKI has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, STAK is priced at $0.87, while NPKI trades at $15.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.63, whereas NPKI's P/E ratio is 35.94. In terms of profitability, STAK's ROE is -0.49%, compared to NPKI's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, STAK is more volatile compared to NPKI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAK.Check NPKI's competition here
STAK vs SLCA Comparison April 2026
STAK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAK stands at 9.3M. In comparison, SLCA has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, STAK is priced at $0.87, while SLCA trades at $15.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.63, whereas SLCA's P/E ratio is 10.54. In terms of profitability, STAK's ROE is -0.49%, compared to SLCA's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, STAK is more volatile compared to SLCA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAK.Check SLCA's competition here
STAK vs PFHC Comparison April 2026
STAK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAK stands at 9.3M. In comparison, PFHC has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, STAK is priced at $0.87, while PFHC trades at $22.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.63, whereas PFHC's P/E ratio is 105.14. In terms of profitability, STAK's ROE is -0.49%, compared to PFHC's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, STAK is more volatile compared to PFHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAK.Check PFHC's competition here
STAK vs MRC Comparison April 2026
STAK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAK stands at 9.3M. In comparison, MRC has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, STAK is priced at $0.87, while MRC trades at $13.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.63, whereas MRC's P/E ratio is 59.91. In terms of profitability, STAK's ROE is -0.49%, compared to MRC's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, STAK is less volatile compared to MRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAK.Check MRC's competition here
STAK vs VAL-WT Comparison April 2026
STAK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAK stands at 9.3M. In comparison, VAL-WT has a market cap of 988.4M. Regarding current trading prices, STAK is priced at $0.87, while VAL-WT trades at $13.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.63, whereas VAL-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STAK's ROE is -0.49%, compared to VAL-WT's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, STAK is more volatile compared to VAL-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAK.Check VAL-WT's competition here
STAK vs HMH Comparison April 2026
STAK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAK stands at 9.3M. In comparison, HMH has a market cap of 867.6M. Regarding current trading prices, STAK is priced at $0.87, while HMH trades at $20.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.63, whereas HMH's P/E ratio is 27.20. In terms of profitability, STAK's ROE is -0.49%, compared to HMH's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, STAK is more volatile compared to HMH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAK.Check HMH's competition here
STAK vs CLB Comparison April 2026
STAK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAK stands at 9.3M. In comparison, CLB has a market cap of 804.5M. Regarding current trading prices, STAK is priced at $0.87, while CLB trades at $17.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.63, whereas CLB's P/E ratio is 27.73. In terms of profitability, STAK's ROE is -0.49%, compared to CLB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, STAK is more volatile compared to CLB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAK.Check CLB's competition here
STAK vs NESRW Comparison April 2026
STAK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAK stands at 9.3M. In comparison, NESRW has a market cap of 709.1M. Regarding current trading prices, STAK is priced at $0.87, while NESRW trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.63, whereas NESRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STAK's ROE is -0.49%, compared to NESRW's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, STAK is less volatile compared to NESRW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAK.Check NESRW's competition here
STAK vs FET Comparison April 2026
STAK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAK stands at 9.3M. In comparison, FET has a market cap of 703.1M. Regarding current trading prices, STAK is priced at $0.87, while FET trades at $61.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.63, whereas FET's P/E ratio is -76.62. In terms of profitability, STAK's ROE is -0.49%, compared to FET's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, STAK is more volatile compared to FET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAK.Check FET's competition here
STAK vs OIS Comparison April 2026
STAK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAK stands at 9.3M. In comparison, OIS has a market cap of 665.5M. Regarding current trading prices, STAK is priced at $0.87, while OIS trades at $11.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.63, whereas OIS's P/E ratio is -5.94. In terms of profitability, STAK's ROE is -0.49%, compared to OIS's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, STAK is more volatile compared to OIS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAK.Check OIS's competition here
STAK vs NR Comparison April 2026
STAK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAK stands at 9.3M. In comparison, NR has a market cap of 627.1M. Regarding current trading prices, STAK is priced at $0.87, while NR trades at $7.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.63, whereas NR's P/E ratio is 19.08. In terms of profitability, STAK's ROE is -0.49%, compared to NR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, STAK is more volatile compared to NR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAK.Check NR's competition here
STAK vs DRQ Comparison April 2026
STAK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAK stands at 9.3M. In comparison, DRQ has a market cap of 530.9M. Regarding current trading prices, STAK is priced at $0.87, while DRQ trades at $15.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.63, whereas DRQ's P/E ratio is -19.76. In terms of profitability, STAK's ROE is -0.49%, compared to DRQ's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, STAK is more volatile compared to DRQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAK.Check DRQ's competition here
STAK vs FTK Comparison April 2026
STAK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAK stands at 9.3M. In comparison, FTK has a market cap of 512.8M. Regarding current trading prices, STAK is priced at $0.87, while FTK trades at $17.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.63, whereas FTK's P/E ratio is 20.26. In terms of profitability, STAK's ROE is -0.49%, compared to FTK's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, STAK is more volatile compared to FTK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAK.Check FTK's competition here
STAK vs NGS Comparison April 2026
STAK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAK stands at 9.3M. In comparison, NGS has a market cap of 498.9M. Regarding current trading prices, STAK is priced at $0.87, while NGS trades at $39.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.63, whereas NGS's P/E ratio is 25.25. In terms of profitability, STAK's ROE is -0.49%, compared to NGS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, STAK is more volatile compared to NGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAK.Check NGS's competition here
STAK vs SOI Comparison April 2026
STAK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAK stands at 9.3M. In comparison, SOI has a market cap of 498.1M. Regarding current trading prices, STAK is priced at $0.87, while SOI trades at $11.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.63, whereas SOI's P/E ratio is 17.15. In terms of profitability, STAK's ROE is -0.49%, compared to SOI's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, STAK is more volatile compared to SOI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAK.Check SOI's competition here
STAK vs RNGR Comparison April 2026
STAK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAK stands at 9.3M. In comparison, RNGR has a market cap of 438.3M. Regarding current trading prices, STAK is priced at $0.87, while RNGR trades at $18.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.63, whereas RNGR's P/E ratio is 33.94. In terms of profitability, STAK's ROE is -0.49%, compared to RNGR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, STAK is more volatile compared to RNGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAK.Check RNGR's competition here
STAK vs NOA Comparison April 2026
STAK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAK stands at 9.3M. In comparison, NOA has a market cap of 419.4M. Regarding current trading prices, STAK is priced at $0.87, while NOA trades at $14.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.63, whereas NOA's P/E ratio is 17.48. In terms of profitability, STAK's ROE is -0.49%, compared to NOA's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, STAK is more volatile compared to NOA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAK.Check NOA's competition here
STAK vs NINE Comparison April 2026
STAK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAK stands at 9.3M. In comparison, NINE has a market cap of 402.9M. Regarding current trading prices, STAK is priced at $0.87, while NINE trades at $9.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.63, whereas NINE's P/E ratio is -7.44. In terms of profitability, STAK's ROE is -0.49%, compared to NINE's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, STAK is more volatile compared to NINE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAK.Check NINE's competition here
STAK vs CCLP Comparison April 2026
STAK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAK stands at 9.3M. In comparison, CCLP has a market cap of 344.8M. Regarding current trading prices, STAK is priced at $0.87, while CCLP trades at $2.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.63, whereas CCLP's P/E ratio is -34.57. In terms of profitability, STAK's ROE is -0.49%, compared to CCLP's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, STAK is more volatile compared to CCLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAK.Check CCLP's competition here
STAK vs SND Comparison April 2026
STAK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAK stands at 9.3M. In comparison, SND has a market cap of 208.1M. Regarding current trading prices, STAK is priced at $0.87, while SND trades at $5.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.63, whereas SND's P/E ratio is 174.67. In terms of profitability, STAK's ROE is -0.49%, compared to SND's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, STAK is more volatile compared to SND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAK.Check SND's competition here
STAK vs NCSM Comparison April 2026
STAK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAK stands at 9.3M. In comparison, NCSM has a market cap of 206.7M. Regarding current trading prices, STAK is priced at $0.87, while NCSM trades at $78.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.63, whereas NCSM's P/E ratio is 9.11. In terms of profitability, STAK's ROE is -0.49%, compared to NCSM's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, STAK is more volatile compared to NCSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAK.Check NCSM's competition here
STAK vs OMSE Comparison April 2026
STAK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAK stands at 9.3M. In comparison, OMSE has a market cap of 199.9M. Regarding current trading prices, STAK is priced at $0.87, while OMSE trades at $4.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.63, whereas OMSE's P/E ratio is 6.83. In terms of profitability, STAK's ROE is -0.49%, compared to OMSE's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, STAK is more volatile compared to OMSE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAK.Check OMSE's competition here
STAK vs BOOM Comparison April 2026
STAK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAK stands at 9.3M. In comparison, BOOM has a market cap of 131.3M. Regarding current trading prices, STAK is priced at $0.87, while BOOM trades at $6.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.63, whereas BOOM's P/E ratio is -7.12. In terms of profitability, STAK's ROE is -0.49%, compared to BOOM's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, STAK is less volatile compared to BOOM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAK.Check BOOM's competition here
STAK vs GEOS Comparison April 2026
STAK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAK stands at 9.3M. In comparison, GEOS has a market cap of 130.8M. Regarding current trading prices, STAK is priced at $0.87, while GEOS trades at $10.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.63, whereas GEOS's P/E ratio is -4.66. In terms of profitability, STAK's ROE is -0.49%, compared to GEOS's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, STAK is more volatile compared to GEOS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAK.Check GEOS's competition here
STAK vs PFIE Comparison April 2026
STAK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAK stands at 9.3M. In comparison, PFIE has a market cap of 117.3M. Regarding current trading prices, STAK is priced at $0.87, while PFIE trades at $2.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.63, whereas PFIE's P/E ratio is 13.37. In terms of profitability, STAK's ROE is -0.49%, compared to PFIE's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, STAK is more volatile compared to PFIE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAK.Check PFIE's competition here
STAK vs DTI Comparison April 2026
STAK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAK stands at 9.3M. In comparison, DTI has a market cap of 116.9M. Regarding current trading prices, STAK is priced at $0.87, while DTI trades at $3.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.63, whereas DTI's P/E ratio is -30.18. In terms of profitability, STAK's ROE is -0.49%, compared to DTI's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, STAK is more volatile compared to DTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAK.Check DTI's competition here
STAK vs DWSN Comparison April 2026
STAK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAK stands at 9.3M. In comparison, DWSN has a market cap of 100.6M. Regarding current trading prices, STAK is priced at $0.87, while DWSN trades at $3.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.63, whereas DWSN's P/E ratio is -54.00. In terms of profitability, STAK's ROE is -0.49%, compared to DWSN's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, STAK is less volatile compared to DWSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAK.Check DWSN's competition here
STAK vs LSE Comparison April 2026
STAK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAK stands at 9.3M. In comparison, LSE has a market cap of 89.4M. Regarding current trading prices, STAK is priced at $0.87, while LSE trades at $5.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.63, whereas LSE's P/E ratio is 65.63. In terms of profitability, STAK's ROE is -0.49%, compared to LSE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, STAK is more volatile compared to LSE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAK.Check LSE's competition here
STAK vs KLXE Comparison April 2026
STAK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAK stands at 9.3M. In comparison, KLXE has a market cap of 65.9M. Regarding current trading prices, STAK is priced at $0.87, while KLXE trades at $3.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.63, whereas KLXE's P/E ratio is -0.81. In terms of profitability, STAK's ROE is -0.49%, compared to KLXE's ROE of +1.47%. Regarding short-term risk, STAK is less volatile compared to KLXE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAK.Check KLXE's competition here
STAK vs SDPI Comparison April 2026
STAK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAK stands at 9.3M. In comparison, SDPI has a market cap of 30.7M. Regarding current trading prices, STAK is priced at $0.87, while SDPI trades at $1.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.63, whereas SDPI's P/E ratio is 7.21. In terms of profitability, STAK's ROE is -0.49%, compared to SDPI's ROE of +0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, STAK is more volatile compared to SDPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAK.Check SDPI's competition here
STAK vs RCON Comparison April 2026
STAK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAK stands at 9.3M. In comparison, RCON has a market cap of 30.6M. Regarding current trading prices, STAK is priced at $0.87, while RCON trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.63, whereas RCON's P/E ratio is -2.27. In terms of profitability, STAK's ROE is -0.49%, compared to RCON's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, STAK is more volatile compared to RCON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAK.Check RCON's competition here
STAK vs ENSV Comparison April 2026
STAK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAK stands at 9.3M. In comparison, ENSV has a market cap of 49.5K. Regarding current trading prices, STAK is priced at $0.87, while ENSV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.63, whereas ENSV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STAK's ROE is -0.49%, compared to ENSV's ROE of -28.53%. Regarding short-term risk, STAK is less volatile compared to ENSV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAK.Check ENSV's competition here
STAK vs FTSI Comparison April 2026
STAK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAK stands at 9.3M. In comparison, FTSI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, STAK is priced at $0.87, while FTSI trades at $26.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.63, whereas FTSI's P/E ratio is 4.67. In terms of profitability, STAK's ROE is -0.49%, compared to FTSI's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, STAK is more volatile compared to FTSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAK.Check FTSI's competition here
STAK vs TDW-WTB Comparison April 2026
STAK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAK stands at 9.3M. In comparison, TDW-WTB has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, STAK is priced at $0.87, while TDW-WTB trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.63, whereas TDW-WTB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STAK's ROE is -0.49%, compared to TDW-WTB's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, STAK is less volatile compared to TDW-WTB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAK.Check TDW-WTB's competition here
STAK vs APLP Comparison April 2026
STAK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAK stands at 9.3M. In comparison, APLP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, STAK is priced at $0.87, while APLP trades at $15.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.63, whereas APLP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STAK's ROE is -0.49%, compared to APLP's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, STAK is more volatile compared to APLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAK.Check APLP's competition here
STAK vs VLI Comparison April 2026
STAK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAK stands at 9.3M. In comparison, VLI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, STAK is priced at $0.87, while VLI trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.63, whereas VLI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STAK's ROE is -0.49%, compared to VLI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, STAK is less volatile compared to VLI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAK.Check VLI's competition here
STAK vs CELP Comparison April 2026
STAK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAK stands at 9.3M. In comparison, CELP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, STAK is priced at $0.87, while CELP trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.63, whereas CELP's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, STAK's ROE is -0.49%, compared to CELP's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, STAK is more volatile compared to CELP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAK.Check CELP's competition here
STAK vs IO Comparison April 2026
STAK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAK stands at 9.3M. In comparison, IO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, STAK is priced at $0.87, while IO trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.63, whereas IO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STAK's ROE is -0.49%, compared to IO's ROE of +0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, STAK is more volatile compared to IO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAK.Check IO's competition here
STAK vs ACDCW Comparison April 2026
STAK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAK stands at 9.3M. In comparison, ACDCW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, STAK is priced at $0.87, while ACDCW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.63, whereas ACDCW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STAK's ROE is -0.49%, compared to ACDCW's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, STAK is less volatile compared to ACDCW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAK.Check ACDCW's competition here
STAK vs GLF Comparison April 2026
STAK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAK stands at 9.3M. In comparison, GLF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, STAK is priced at $0.87, while GLF trades at $28.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.63, whereas GLF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STAK's ROE is -0.49%, compared to GLF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, STAK is more volatile compared to GLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAK.Check GLF's competition here
STAK vs USWS Comparison April 2026
STAK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAK stands at 9.3M. In comparison, USWS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, STAK is priced at $0.87, while USWS trades at $7.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.63, whereas USWS's P/E ratio is -3.94. In terms of profitability, STAK's ROE is -0.49%, compared to USWS's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, STAK is more volatile compared to USWS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAK.Check USWS's competition here
STAK vs EXTN Comparison April 2026
STAK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAK stands at 9.3M. In comparison, EXTN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, STAK is priced at $0.87, while EXTN trades at $4.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.63, whereas EXTN's P/E ratio is -1.35. In terms of profitability, STAK's ROE is -0.49%, compared to EXTN's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, STAK is more volatile compared to EXTN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAK.Check EXTN's competition here
STAK vs CETC Comparison April 2026
STAK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAK stands at 9.3M. In comparison, CETC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, STAK is priced at $0.87, while CETC trades at $4.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.63, whereas CETC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STAK's ROE is -0.49%, compared to CETC's ROE of -1.15%. Regarding short-term risk, STAK is less volatile compared to CETC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAK.Check CETC's competition here
STAK vs USWSW Comparison April 2026
STAK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAK stands at 9.3M. In comparison, USWSW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, STAK is priced at $0.87, while USWSW trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.63, whereas USWSW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STAK's ROE is -0.49%, compared to USWSW's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, STAK is less volatile compared to USWSW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAK.Check USWSW's competition here
STAK vs TDW-WTA Comparison April 2026
STAK plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAK stands at 9.3M. In comparison, TDW-WTA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, STAK is priced at $0.87, while TDW-WTA trades at $2.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.63, whereas TDW-WTA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STAK's ROE is -0.49%, compared to TDW-WTA's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, STAK is less volatile compared to TDW-WTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAK.Check TDW-WTA's competition here