Tidewater Inc. Series A
Tidewater Inc. Series A (TDW-WTA) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (TDW-WTA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Oil & Gas Equipment & Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TDW-WTA | $2.58 | +93.98% | 0 | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| SLB | $55.63 | -0.22% | 82.8B | 24.39 | $2.27 | +2.07% |
| BKR | $64.50 | -0.17% | 63.6B | 20.49 | $3.13 | +1.43% |
| HAL | $41.26 | -0.08% | 34.9B | 23.07 | $1.81 | +1.64% |
| TS | $61.45 | -2.20% | 33.1B | 16.26 | $3.80 | +2.75% |
| FTI | $72.09 | -1.26% | 28.4B | 27.30 | $2.61 | +0.28% |
| WFRD | $109.55 | +0.33% | 7.8B | 17.03 | $6.39 | +0.97% |
| NOV | $20.50 | -0.51% | 7.3B | 81.46 | $0.25 | +2.58% |
| VAL | $104.05 | +0.75% | 7.3B | 7.44 | $14.15 | N/A |
| AROC | $37.79 | +1.54% | 6.6B | 20.35 | $1.84 | +2.31% |
Stock Comparison
TDW-WTA vs SLB Comparison May 2026
TDW-WTA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TDW-WTA stands at 0. In comparison, SLB has a market cap of 82.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TDW-WTA is priced at $2.58, while SLB trades at $55.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TDW-WTA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SLB's P/E ratio is 24.39. In terms of profitability, TDW-WTA's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SLB's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TDW-WTA is more volatile compared to SLB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TDW-WTA.Check SLB's competition here
TDW-WTA vs BKR Comparison May 2026
TDW-WTA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TDW-WTA stands at 0. In comparison, BKR has a market cap of 63.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TDW-WTA is priced at $2.58, while BKR trades at $64.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TDW-WTA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BKR's P/E ratio is 20.49. In terms of profitability, TDW-WTA's ROE is +0.24%, compared to BKR's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TDW-WTA is more volatile compared to BKR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TDW-WTA.Check BKR's competition here
TDW-WTA vs HAL Comparison May 2026
TDW-WTA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TDW-WTA stands at 0. In comparison, HAL has a market cap of 34.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TDW-WTA is priced at $2.58, while HAL trades at $41.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TDW-WTA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HAL's P/E ratio is 23.07. In terms of profitability, TDW-WTA's ROE is +0.24%, compared to HAL's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TDW-WTA is more volatile compared to HAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TDW-WTA.Check HAL's competition here
TDW-WTA vs TS Comparison May 2026
TDW-WTA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TDW-WTA stands at 0. In comparison, TS has a market cap of 33.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TDW-WTA is priced at $2.58, while TS trades at $61.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TDW-WTA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TS's P/E ratio is 16.26. In terms of profitability, TDW-WTA's ROE is +0.24%, compared to TS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TDW-WTA is more volatile compared to TS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TDW-WTA.Check TS's competition here
TDW-WTA vs FTI Comparison May 2026
TDW-WTA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TDW-WTA stands at 0. In comparison, FTI has a market cap of 28.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TDW-WTA is priced at $2.58, while FTI trades at $72.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TDW-WTA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FTI's P/E ratio is 27.30. In terms of profitability, TDW-WTA's ROE is +0.24%, compared to FTI's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, TDW-WTA is more volatile compared to FTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TDW-WTA.Check FTI's competition here
TDW-WTA vs WFRD Comparison May 2026
TDW-WTA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TDW-WTA stands at 0. In comparison, WFRD has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TDW-WTA is priced at $2.58, while WFRD trades at $109.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TDW-WTA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WFRD's P/E ratio is 17.03. In terms of profitability, TDW-WTA's ROE is +0.24%, compared to WFRD's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, TDW-WTA is more volatile compared to WFRD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TDW-WTA.Check WFRD's competition here
TDW-WTA vs NOV Comparison May 2026
TDW-WTA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TDW-WTA stands at 0. In comparison, NOV has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TDW-WTA is priced at $2.58, while NOV trades at $20.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TDW-WTA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NOV's P/E ratio is 81.46. In terms of profitability, TDW-WTA's ROE is +0.24%, compared to NOV's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TDW-WTA is more volatile compared to NOV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TDW-WTA.Check NOV's competition here
TDW-WTA vs VAL Comparison May 2026
TDW-WTA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TDW-WTA stands at 0. In comparison, VAL has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TDW-WTA is priced at $2.58, while VAL trades at $104.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TDW-WTA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VAL's P/E ratio is 7.44. In terms of profitability, TDW-WTA's ROE is +0.24%, compared to VAL's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, TDW-WTA is more volatile compared to VAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TDW-WTA.Check VAL's competition here
TDW-WTA vs AROC Comparison May 2026
TDW-WTA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TDW-WTA stands at 0. In comparison, AROC has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TDW-WTA is priced at $2.58, while AROC trades at $37.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TDW-WTA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AROC's P/E ratio is 20.35. In terms of profitability, TDW-WTA's ROE is +0.24%, compared to AROC's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TDW-WTA is more volatile compared to AROC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TDW-WTA.Check AROC's competition here
TDW-WTA vs KGS Comparison May 2026
TDW-WTA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TDW-WTA stands at 0. In comparison, KGS has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TDW-WTA is priced at $2.58, while KGS trades at $75.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TDW-WTA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KGS's P/E ratio is 96.67. In terms of profitability, TDW-WTA's ROE is +0.24%, compared to KGS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TDW-WTA is more volatile compared to KGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TDW-WTA.Check KGS's competition here
TDW-WTA vs SEI Comparison May 2026
TDW-WTA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TDW-WTA stands at 0. In comparison, SEI has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TDW-WTA is priced at $2.58, while SEI trades at $76.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TDW-WTA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SEI's P/E ratio is 93.61. In terms of profitability, TDW-WTA's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SEI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TDW-WTA is more volatile compared to SEI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TDW-WTA.Check SEI's competition here
TDW-WTA vs LBRT Comparison May 2026
TDW-WTA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TDW-WTA stands at 0. In comparison, LBRT has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TDW-WTA is priced at $2.58, while LBRT trades at $32.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TDW-WTA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LBRT's P/E ratio is 36.20. In terms of profitability, TDW-WTA's ROE is +0.24%, compared to LBRT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TDW-WTA is more volatile compared to LBRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TDW-WTA.Check LBRT's competition here
TDW-WTA vs LB Comparison May 2026
TDW-WTA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TDW-WTA stands at 0. In comparison, LB has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TDW-WTA is priced at $2.58, while LB trades at $69.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TDW-WTA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LB's P/E ratio is 71.89. In terms of profitability, TDW-WTA's ROE is +0.24%, compared to LB's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TDW-WTA is more volatile compared to LB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TDW-WTA.Check LB's competition here
TDW-WTA vs CHX Comparison May 2026
TDW-WTA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TDW-WTA stands at 0. In comparison, CHX has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TDW-WTA is priced at $2.58, while CHX trades at $25.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TDW-WTA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CHX's P/E ratio is 17.09. In terms of profitability, TDW-WTA's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CHX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TDW-WTA is more volatile compared to CHX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TDW-WTA.Check CHX's competition here
TDW-WTA vs TDW Comparison May 2026
TDW-WTA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TDW-WTA stands at 0. In comparison, TDW has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TDW-WTA is priced at $2.58, while TDW trades at $81.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TDW-WTA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TDW's P/E ratio is 13.88. In terms of profitability, TDW-WTA's ROE is +0.24%, compared to TDW's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TDW-WTA is more volatile compared to TDW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TDW-WTA.Check TDW's competition here
TDW-WTA vs WHD Comparison May 2026
TDW-WTA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TDW-WTA stands at 0. In comparison, WHD has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, TDW-WTA is priced at $2.58, while WHD trades at $57.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TDW-WTA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WHD's P/E ratio is 53.23. In terms of profitability, TDW-WTA's ROE is +0.24%, compared to WHD's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TDW-WTA is more volatile compared to WHD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TDW-WTA.Check WHD's competition here
TDW-WTA vs OII Comparison May 2026
TDW-WTA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TDW-WTA stands at 0. In comparison, OII has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TDW-WTA is priced at $2.58, while OII trades at $37.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TDW-WTA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OII's P/E ratio is 11.26. In terms of profitability, TDW-WTA's ROE is +0.24%, compared to OII's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, TDW-WTA is more volatile compared to OII. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TDW-WTA.Check OII's competition here
TDW-WTA vs USAC Comparison May 2026
TDW-WTA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TDW-WTA stands at 0. In comparison, USAC has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TDW-WTA is priced at $2.58, while USAC trades at $29.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TDW-WTA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas USAC's P/E ratio is 30.28. In terms of profitability, TDW-WTA's ROE is +0.24%, compared to USAC's ROE of +6.51%. Regarding short-term risk, TDW-WTA is more volatile compared to USAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TDW-WTA.Check USAC's competition here
TDW-WTA vs EFXT Comparison May 2026
TDW-WTA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TDW-WTA stands at 0. In comparison, EFXT has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TDW-WTA is priced at $2.58, while EFXT trades at $27.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TDW-WTA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EFXT's P/E ratio is 40.99. In terms of profitability, TDW-WTA's ROE is +0.24%, compared to EFXT's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TDW-WTA is more volatile compared to EFXT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TDW-WTA.Check EFXT's competition here
TDW-WTA vs CAM Comparison May 2026
TDW-WTA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TDW-WTA stands at 0. In comparison, CAM has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TDW-WTA is priced at $2.58, while CAM trades at $66.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TDW-WTA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CAM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TDW-WTA's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CAM's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TDW-WTA is more volatile compared to CAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TDW-WTA.Check CAM's competition here
TDW-WTA vs TDW-WT Comparison May 2026
TDW-WTA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TDW-WTA stands at 0. In comparison, TDW-WT has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TDW-WTA is priced at $2.58, while TDW-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TDW-WTA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TDW-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TDW-WTA's ROE is +0.24%, compared to TDW-WT's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TDW-WTA is more volatile compared to TDW-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TDW-WTA.Check TDW-WT's competition here
TDW-WTA vs NESR Comparison May 2026
TDW-WTA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TDW-WTA stands at 0. In comparison, NESR has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TDW-WTA is priced at $2.58, while NESR trades at $25.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TDW-WTA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NESR's P/E ratio is 39.78. In terms of profitability, TDW-WTA's ROE is +0.24%, compared to NESR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TDW-WTA is more volatile compared to NESR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TDW-WTA.Check NESR's competition here
TDW-WTA vs FLOC Comparison May 2026
TDW-WTA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TDW-WTA stands at 0. In comparison, FLOC has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TDW-WTA is priced at $2.58, while FLOC trades at $27.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TDW-WTA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FLOC's P/E ratio is 22.20. In terms of profitability, TDW-WTA's ROE is +0.24%, compared to FLOC's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TDW-WTA is more volatile compared to FLOC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TDW-WTA.Check FLOC's competition here
TDW-WTA vs NEX Comparison May 2026
TDW-WTA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TDW-WTA stands at 0. In comparison, NEX has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TDW-WTA is priced at $2.58, while NEX trades at $10.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TDW-WTA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NEX's P/E ratio is 3.94. In terms of profitability, TDW-WTA's ROE is +0.24%, compared to NEX's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, TDW-WTA is more volatile compared to NEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TDW-WTA.Check NEX's competition here
TDW-WTA vs AESI Comparison May 2026
TDW-WTA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TDW-WTA stands at 0. In comparison, AESI has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TDW-WTA is priced at $2.58, while AESI trades at $18.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TDW-WTA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AESI's P/E ratio is -23.57. In terms of profitability, TDW-WTA's ROE is +0.24%, compared to AESI's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TDW-WTA is more volatile compared to AESI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TDW-WTA.Check AESI's competition here
TDW-WTA vs PUMP Comparison May 2026
TDW-WTA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TDW-WTA stands at 0. In comparison, PUMP has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TDW-WTA is priced at $2.58, while PUMP trades at $17.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TDW-WTA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PUMP's P/E ratio is -158.59. In terms of profitability, TDW-WTA's ROE is +0.24%, compared to PUMP's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TDW-WTA is more volatile compared to PUMP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TDW-WTA.Check PUMP's competition here
TDW-WTA vs INVX Comparison May 2026
TDW-WTA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TDW-WTA stands at 0. In comparison, INVX has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TDW-WTA is priced at $2.58, while INVX trades at $28.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TDW-WTA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas INVX's P/E ratio is 37.32. In terms of profitability, TDW-WTA's ROE is +0.24%, compared to INVX's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TDW-WTA is more volatile compared to INVX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TDW-WTA.Check INVX's competition here
TDW-WTA vs XPRO Comparison May 2026
TDW-WTA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TDW-WTA stands at 0. In comparison, XPRO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TDW-WTA is priced at $2.58, while XPRO trades at $15.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TDW-WTA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XPRO's P/E ratio is 49.50. In terms of profitability, TDW-WTA's ROE is +0.24%, compared to XPRO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TDW-WTA is more volatile compared to XPRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TDW-WTA.Check XPRO's competition here
TDW-WTA vs DNOW Comparison May 2026
TDW-WTA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TDW-WTA stands at 0. In comparison, DNOW has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TDW-WTA is priced at $2.58, while DNOW trades at $13.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TDW-WTA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DNOW's P/E ratio is -11.04. In terms of profitability, TDW-WTA's ROE is +0.24%, compared to DNOW's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TDW-WTA is more volatile compared to DNOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TDW-WTA.Check DNOW's competition here
TDW-WTA vs RES Comparison May 2026
TDW-WTA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TDW-WTA stands at 0. In comparison, RES has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TDW-WTA is priced at $2.58, while RES trades at $6.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TDW-WTA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RES's P/E ratio is 76.83. In terms of profitability, TDW-WTA's ROE is +0.24%, compared to RES's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TDW-WTA is more volatile compared to RES. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TDW-WTA.Check RES's competition here
TDW-WTA vs VAL-WT Comparison May 2026
TDW-WTA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TDW-WTA stands at 0. In comparison, VAL-WT has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TDW-WTA is priced at $2.58, while VAL-WT trades at $20.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TDW-WTA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VAL-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TDW-WTA's ROE is +0.24%, compared to VAL-WT's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, TDW-WTA is more volatile compared to VAL-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TDW-WTA.Check VAL-WT's competition here
TDW-WTA vs HLX Comparison May 2026
TDW-WTA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TDW-WTA stands at 0. In comparison, HLX has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TDW-WTA is priced at $2.58, while HLX trades at $10.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TDW-WTA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HLX's P/E ratio is 100.45. In terms of profitability, TDW-WTA's ROE is +0.24%, compared to HLX's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TDW-WTA is more volatile compared to HLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TDW-WTA.Check HLX's competition here
TDW-WTA vs TTI Comparison May 2026
TDW-WTA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TDW-WTA stands at 0. In comparison, TTI has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TDW-WTA is priced at $2.58, while TTI trades at $10.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TDW-WTA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TTI's P/E ratio is 175.33. In terms of profitability, TDW-WTA's ROE is +0.24%, compared to TTI's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TDW-WTA is more volatile compared to TTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TDW-WTA.Check TTI's competition here
TDW-WTA vs ACDC Comparison May 2026
TDW-WTA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TDW-WTA stands at 0. In comparison, ACDC has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TDW-WTA is priced at $2.58, while ACDC trades at $7.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TDW-WTA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ACDC's P/E ratio is -2.83. In terms of profitability, TDW-WTA's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ACDC's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, TDW-WTA is more volatile compared to ACDC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TDW-WTA.Check ACDC's competition here
TDW-WTA vs NPKI Comparison May 2026
TDW-WTA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TDW-WTA stands at 0. In comparison, NPKI has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TDW-WTA is priced at $2.58, while NPKI trades at $15.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TDW-WTA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NPKI's P/E ratio is 36.36. In terms of profitability, TDW-WTA's ROE is +0.24%, compared to NPKI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TDW-WTA is more volatile compared to NPKI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TDW-WTA.Check NPKI's competition here
TDW-WTA vs VTOL Comparison May 2026
TDW-WTA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TDW-WTA stands at 0. In comparison, VTOL has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TDW-WTA is priced at $2.58, while VTOL trades at $42.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TDW-WTA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VTOL's P/E ratio is 10.98. In terms of profitability, TDW-WTA's ROE is +0.24%, compared to VTOL's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TDW-WTA is more volatile compared to VTOL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TDW-WTA.Check VTOL's competition here
TDW-WTA vs SLCA Comparison May 2026
TDW-WTA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TDW-WTA stands at 0. In comparison, SLCA has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TDW-WTA is priced at $2.58, while SLCA trades at $15.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TDW-WTA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SLCA's P/E ratio is 10.54. In terms of profitability, TDW-WTA's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SLCA's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TDW-WTA is more volatile compared to SLCA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TDW-WTA.Check SLCA's competition here
TDW-WTA vs PFHC Comparison May 2026
TDW-WTA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TDW-WTA stands at 0. In comparison, PFHC has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TDW-WTA is priced at $2.58, while PFHC trades at $22.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TDW-WTA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PFHC's P/E ratio is 105.14. In terms of profitability, TDW-WTA's ROE is +0.24%, compared to PFHC's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, TDW-WTA is more volatile compared to PFHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TDW-WTA.Check PFHC's competition here
TDW-WTA vs MRC Comparison May 2026
TDW-WTA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TDW-WTA stands at 0. In comparison, MRC has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TDW-WTA is priced at $2.58, while MRC trades at $13.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TDW-WTA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MRC's P/E ratio is 59.91. In terms of profitability, TDW-WTA's ROE is +0.24%, compared to MRC's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TDW-WTA is more volatile compared to MRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TDW-WTA.Check MRC's competition here
TDW-WTA vs HMH Comparison May 2026
TDW-WTA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TDW-WTA stands at 0. In comparison, HMH has a market cap of 969.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TDW-WTA is priced at $2.58, while HMH trades at $21.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TDW-WTA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HMH's P/E ratio is 166.85. In terms of profitability, TDW-WTA's ROE is +0.24%, compared to HMH's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TDW-WTA is more volatile compared to HMH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TDW-WTA.Check HMH's competition here
TDW-WTA vs NESRW Comparison May 2026
TDW-WTA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TDW-WTA stands at 0. In comparison, NESRW has a market cap of 709.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TDW-WTA is priced at $2.58, while NESRW trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TDW-WTA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NESRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TDW-WTA's ROE is +0.24%, compared to NESRW's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TDW-WTA is more volatile compared to NESRW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TDW-WTA.Check NESRW's competition here
TDW-WTA vs FET Comparison May 2026
TDW-WTA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TDW-WTA stands at 0. In comparison, FET has a market cap of 636.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TDW-WTA is priced at $2.58, while FET trades at $56.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TDW-WTA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FET's P/E ratio is -110.45. In terms of profitability, TDW-WTA's ROE is +0.24%, compared to FET's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TDW-WTA is more volatile compared to FET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TDW-WTA.Check FET's competition here
TDW-WTA vs NR Comparison May 2026
TDW-WTA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TDW-WTA stands at 0. In comparison, NR has a market cap of 627.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TDW-WTA is priced at $2.58, while NR trades at $7.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TDW-WTA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NR's P/E ratio is 19.08. In terms of profitability, TDW-WTA's ROE is +0.24%, compared to NR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TDW-WTA is more volatile compared to NR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TDW-WTA.Check NR's competition here
TDW-WTA vs CLB Comparison May 2026
TDW-WTA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TDW-WTA stands at 0. In comparison, CLB has a market cap of 602.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TDW-WTA is priced at $2.58, while CLB trades at $12.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TDW-WTA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CLB's P/E ratio is 21.44. In terms of profitability, TDW-WTA's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CLB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TDW-WTA is more volatile compared to CLB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TDW-WTA.Check CLB's competition here
TDW-WTA vs FTK Comparison May 2026
TDW-WTA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TDW-WTA stands at 0. In comparison, FTK has a market cap of 590.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TDW-WTA is priced at $2.58, while FTK trades at $20.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TDW-WTA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FTK's P/E ratio is 24.81. In terms of profitability, TDW-WTA's ROE is +0.24%, compared to FTK's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, TDW-WTA is more volatile compared to FTK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TDW-WTA.Check FTK's competition here
TDW-WTA vs OIS Comparison May 2026
TDW-WTA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TDW-WTA stands at 0. In comparison, OIS has a market cap of 542M. Regarding current trading prices, TDW-WTA is priced at $2.58, while OIS trades at $8.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TDW-WTA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OIS's P/E ratio is -4.76. In terms of profitability, TDW-WTA's ROE is +0.24%, compared to OIS's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TDW-WTA is more volatile compared to OIS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TDW-WTA.Check OIS's competition here
TDW-WTA vs NGS Comparison May 2026
TDW-WTA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TDW-WTA stands at 0. In comparison, NGS has a market cap of 533.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TDW-WTA is priced at $2.58, while NGS trades at $42.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TDW-WTA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NGS's P/E ratio is 24.63. In terms of profitability, TDW-WTA's ROE is +0.24%, compared to NGS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TDW-WTA is more volatile compared to NGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TDW-WTA.Check NGS's competition here
TDW-WTA vs DRQ Comparison May 2026
TDW-WTA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TDW-WTA stands at 0. In comparison, DRQ has a market cap of 530.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TDW-WTA is priced at $2.58, while DRQ trades at $15.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TDW-WTA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DRQ's P/E ratio is -19.76. In terms of profitability, TDW-WTA's ROE is +0.24%, compared to DRQ's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TDW-WTA is more volatile compared to DRQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TDW-WTA.Check DRQ's competition here
TDW-WTA vs SOI Comparison May 2026
TDW-WTA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TDW-WTA stands at 0. In comparison, SOI has a market cap of 498.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TDW-WTA is priced at $2.58, while SOI trades at $11.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TDW-WTA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SOI's P/E ratio is 17.15. In terms of profitability, TDW-WTA's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SOI's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, TDW-WTA is more volatile compared to SOI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TDW-WTA.Check SOI's competition here
TDW-WTA vs NINE Comparison May 2026
TDW-WTA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TDW-WTA stands at 0. In comparison, NINE has a market cap of 445.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TDW-WTA is priced at $2.58, while NINE trades at $10.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TDW-WTA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NINE's P/E ratio is -8.23. In terms of profitability, TDW-WTA's ROE is +0.24%, compared to NINE's ROE of -1.57%. Regarding short-term risk, TDW-WTA is more volatile compared to NINE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TDW-WTA.Check NINE's competition here
TDW-WTA vs NOA Comparison May 2026
TDW-WTA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TDW-WTA stands at 0. In comparison, NOA has a market cap of 437.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TDW-WTA is priced at $2.58, while NOA trades at $15.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TDW-WTA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NOA's P/E ratio is 18.72. In terms of profitability, TDW-WTA's ROE is +0.24%, compared to NOA's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TDW-WTA is more volatile compared to NOA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TDW-WTA.Check NOA's competition here
TDW-WTA vs RNGR Comparison May 2026
TDW-WTA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TDW-WTA stands at 0. In comparison, RNGR has a market cap of 390.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TDW-WTA is priced at $2.58, while RNGR trades at $16.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TDW-WTA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RNGR's P/E ratio is 26.10. In terms of profitability, TDW-WTA's ROE is +0.24%, compared to RNGR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TDW-WTA is more volatile compared to RNGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TDW-WTA.Check RNGR's competition here
TDW-WTA vs CCLP Comparison May 2026
TDW-WTA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TDW-WTA stands at 0. In comparison, CCLP has a market cap of 344.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TDW-WTA is priced at $2.58, while CCLP trades at $2.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TDW-WTA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CCLP's P/E ratio is -34.57. In terms of profitability, TDW-WTA's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CCLP's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, TDW-WTA is more volatile compared to CCLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TDW-WTA.Check CCLP's competition here
TDW-WTA vs SND Comparison May 2026
TDW-WTA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TDW-WTA stands at 0. In comparison, SND has a market cap of 204.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TDW-WTA is priced at $2.58, while SND trades at $4.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TDW-WTA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SND's P/E ratio is 8.64. In terms of profitability, TDW-WTA's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SND's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TDW-WTA is more volatile compared to SND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TDW-WTA.Check SND's competition here
TDW-WTA vs OMSE Comparison May 2026
TDW-WTA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TDW-WTA stands at 0. In comparison, OMSE has a market cap of 194M. Regarding current trading prices, TDW-WTA is priced at $2.58, while OMSE trades at $4.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TDW-WTA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OMSE's P/E ratio is 6.44. In terms of profitability, TDW-WTA's ROE is +0.24%, compared to OMSE's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, TDW-WTA is more volatile compared to OMSE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TDW-WTA.Check OMSE's competition here
TDW-WTA vs BOOM Comparison May 2026
TDW-WTA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TDW-WTA stands at 0. In comparison, BOOM has a market cap of 141.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TDW-WTA is priced at $2.58, while BOOM trades at $6.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TDW-WTA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BOOM's P/E ratio is -5.41. In terms of profitability, TDW-WTA's ROE is +0.24%, compared to BOOM's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TDW-WTA is more volatile compared to BOOM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TDW-WTA.Check BOOM's competition here
TDW-WTA vs DWSN Comparison May 2026
TDW-WTA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TDW-WTA stands at 0. In comparison, DWSN has a market cap of 121.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TDW-WTA is priced at $2.58, while DWSN trades at $4.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TDW-WTA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DWSN's P/E ratio is -65.17. In terms of profitability, TDW-WTA's ROE is +0.24%, compared to DWSN's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, TDW-WTA is more volatile compared to DWSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TDW-WTA.Check DWSN's competition here
TDW-WTA vs PFIE Comparison May 2026
TDW-WTA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TDW-WTA stands at 0. In comparison, PFIE has a market cap of 117.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TDW-WTA is priced at $2.58, while PFIE trades at $2.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TDW-WTA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PFIE's P/E ratio is 13.37. In terms of profitability, TDW-WTA's ROE is +0.24%, compared to PFIE's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TDW-WTA is more volatile compared to PFIE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TDW-WTA.Check PFIE's competition here
TDW-WTA vs NCSM Comparison May 2026
TDW-WTA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TDW-WTA stands at 0. In comparison, NCSM has a market cap of 112M. Regarding current trading prices, TDW-WTA is priced at $2.58, while NCSM trades at $42.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TDW-WTA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NCSM's P/E ratio is 6.10. In terms of profitability, TDW-WTA's ROE is +0.24%, compared to NCSM's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TDW-WTA is more volatile compared to NCSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TDW-WTA.Check NCSM's competition here
TDW-WTA vs DTI Comparison May 2026
TDW-WTA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TDW-WTA stands at 0. In comparison, DTI has a market cap of 105.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TDW-WTA is priced at $2.58, while DTI trades at $3.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TDW-WTA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DTI's P/E ratio is -30.10. In terms of profitability, TDW-WTA's ROE is +0.24%, compared to DTI's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TDW-WTA is more volatile compared to DTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TDW-WTA.Check DTI's competition here
TDW-WTA vs GEOS Comparison May 2026
TDW-WTA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TDW-WTA stands at 0. In comparison, GEOS has a market cap of 97.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TDW-WTA is priced at $2.58, while GEOS trades at $7.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TDW-WTA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GEOS's P/E ratio is -3.31. In terms of profitability, TDW-WTA's ROE is +0.24%, compared to GEOS's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TDW-WTA is more volatile compared to GEOS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TDW-WTA.Check GEOS's competition here
TDW-WTA vs LSE Comparison May 2026
TDW-WTA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TDW-WTA stands at 0. In comparison, LSE has a market cap of 78.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TDW-WTA is priced at $2.58, while LSE trades at $4.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TDW-WTA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LSE's P/E ratio is 57.75. In terms of profitability, TDW-WTA's ROE is +0.24%, compared to LSE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TDW-WTA is more volatile compared to LSE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TDW-WTA.Check LSE's competition here
TDW-WTA vs KLXE Comparison May 2026
TDW-WTA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TDW-WTA stands at 0. In comparison, KLXE has a market cap of 78.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TDW-WTA is priced at $2.58, while KLXE trades at $3.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TDW-WTA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KLXE's P/E ratio is -1.05. In terms of profitability, TDW-WTA's ROE is +0.24%, compared to KLXE's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TDW-WTA is more volatile compared to KLXE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TDW-WTA.Check KLXE's competition here
TDW-WTA vs SDPI Comparison May 2026
TDW-WTA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TDW-WTA stands at 0. In comparison, SDPI has a market cap of 30.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TDW-WTA is priced at $2.58, while SDPI trades at $1.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TDW-WTA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SDPI's P/E ratio is 7.21. In terms of profitability, TDW-WTA's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SDPI's ROE of +0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, TDW-WTA is more volatile compared to SDPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TDW-WTA.Check SDPI's competition here
TDW-WTA vs RCON Comparison May 2026
TDW-WTA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TDW-WTA stands at 0. In comparison, RCON has a market cap of 19.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TDW-WTA is priced at $2.58, while RCON trades at $0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TDW-WTA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RCON's P/E ratio is -1.56. In terms of profitability, TDW-WTA's ROE is +0.24%, compared to RCON's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TDW-WTA is more volatile compared to RCON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TDW-WTA.Check RCON's competition here
TDW-WTA vs STAK Comparison May 2026
TDW-WTA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TDW-WTA stands at 0. In comparison, STAK has a market cap of 12M. Regarding current trading prices, TDW-WTA is priced at $2.58, while STAK trades at $1.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TDW-WTA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STAK's P/E ratio is -2.11. In terms of profitability, TDW-WTA's ROE is +0.24%, compared to STAK's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, TDW-WTA is more volatile compared to STAK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TDW-WTA.Check STAK's competition here
TDW-WTA vs ENSV Comparison May 2026
TDW-WTA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TDW-WTA stands at 0. In comparison, ENSV has a market cap of 29.1K. Regarding current trading prices, TDW-WTA is priced at $2.58, while ENSV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TDW-WTA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ENSV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TDW-WTA's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ENSV's ROE of -28.53%. Regarding short-term risk, TDW-WTA is more volatile compared to ENSV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TDW-WTA.Check ENSV's competition here
TDW-WTA vs GLF Comparison May 2026
TDW-WTA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TDW-WTA stands at 0. In comparison, GLF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TDW-WTA is priced at $2.58, while GLF trades at $28.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TDW-WTA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GLF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TDW-WTA's ROE is +0.24%, compared to GLF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TDW-WTA is more volatile compared to GLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TDW-WTA.Check GLF's competition here
TDW-WTA vs ACDCW Comparison May 2026
TDW-WTA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TDW-WTA stands at 0. In comparison, ACDCW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TDW-WTA is priced at $2.58, while ACDCW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TDW-WTA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ACDCW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TDW-WTA's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ACDCW's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, TDW-WTA is more volatile compared to ACDCW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TDW-WTA.Check ACDCW's competition here
TDW-WTA vs CETC Comparison May 2026
TDW-WTA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TDW-WTA stands at 0. In comparison, CETC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TDW-WTA is priced at $2.58, while CETC trades at $4.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TDW-WTA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CETC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TDW-WTA's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CETC's ROE of -1.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TDW-WTA is more volatile compared to CETC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TDW-WTA.Check CETC's competition here
TDW-WTA vs APLP Comparison May 2026
TDW-WTA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TDW-WTA stands at 0. In comparison, APLP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TDW-WTA is priced at $2.58, while APLP trades at $15.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TDW-WTA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas APLP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TDW-WTA's ROE is +0.24%, compared to APLP's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TDW-WTA is more volatile compared to APLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TDW-WTA.Check APLP's competition here
TDW-WTA vs USWSW Comparison May 2026
TDW-WTA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TDW-WTA stands at 0. In comparison, USWSW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TDW-WTA is priced at $2.58, while USWSW trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TDW-WTA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas USWSW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TDW-WTA's ROE is +0.24%, compared to USWSW's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TDW-WTA is more volatile compared to USWSW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TDW-WTA.Check USWSW's competition here
TDW-WTA vs VLI Comparison May 2026
TDW-WTA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TDW-WTA stands at 0. In comparison, VLI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TDW-WTA is priced at $2.58, while VLI trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TDW-WTA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VLI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TDW-WTA's ROE is +0.24%, compared to VLI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TDW-WTA is more volatile compared to VLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TDW-WTA.Check VLI's competition here
TDW-WTA vs FTSI Comparison May 2026
TDW-WTA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TDW-WTA stands at 0. In comparison, FTSI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TDW-WTA is priced at $2.58, while FTSI trades at $26.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TDW-WTA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FTSI's P/E ratio is 4.67. In terms of profitability, TDW-WTA's ROE is +0.24%, compared to FTSI's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TDW-WTA is more volatile compared to FTSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TDW-WTA.Check FTSI's competition here
TDW-WTA vs CELP Comparison May 2026
TDW-WTA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TDW-WTA stands at 0. In comparison, CELP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TDW-WTA is priced at $2.58, while CELP trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TDW-WTA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CELP's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, TDW-WTA's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CELP's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TDW-WTA is more volatile compared to CELP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TDW-WTA.Check CELP's competition here
TDW-WTA vs USWS Comparison May 2026
TDW-WTA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TDW-WTA stands at 0. In comparison, USWS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TDW-WTA is priced at $2.58, while USWS trades at $7.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TDW-WTA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas USWS's P/E ratio is -3.94. In terms of profitability, TDW-WTA's ROE is +0.24%, compared to USWS's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TDW-WTA is more volatile compared to USWS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TDW-WTA.Check USWS's competition here
TDW-WTA vs IO Comparison May 2026
TDW-WTA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TDW-WTA stands at 0. In comparison, IO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TDW-WTA is priced at $2.58, while IO trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TDW-WTA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TDW-WTA's ROE is +0.24%, compared to IO's ROE of +0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, TDW-WTA is more volatile compared to IO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TDW-WTA.Check IO's competition here
TDW-WTA vs EXTN Comparison May 2026
TDW-WTA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TDW-WTA stands at 0. In comparison, EXTN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TDW-WTA is priced at $2.58, while EXTN trades at $4.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TDW-WTA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EXTN's P/E ratio is -1.35. In terms of profitability, TDW-WTA's ROE is +0.24%, compared to EXTN's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, TDW-WTA is more volatile compared to EXTN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TDW-WTA.Check EXTN's competition here
TDW-WTA vs TDW-WTB Comparison May 2026
TDW-WTA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TDW-WTA stands at 0. In comparison, TDW-WTB has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TDW-WTA is priced at $2.58, while TDW-WTB trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TDW-WTA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TDW-WTB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TDW-WTA's ROE is +0.24%, compared to TDW-WTB's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TDW-WTA is less volatile compared to TDW-WTB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TDW-WTA.Check TDW-WTB's competition here