Newpark Resources, Inc.
Newpark Resources, Inc. (NR) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (NR) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Oil & Gas Equipment & Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NR | $7.25 | -4.86% | 627.1M | 19.08 | $0.38 | N/A |
| SLB | $55.41 | +1.21% | 84.3B | 23.89 | $2.35 | +2.05% |
| BKR | $68.40 | +6.06% | 68.4B | 22.03 | $3.13 | +1.32% |
| TS | $62.93 | +0.48% | 34B | 17.29 | $3.66 | +2.69% |
| HAL | $40.31 | +1.64% | 33.7B | 22.28 | $1.81 | +1.69% |
| FTI | $74.71 | +3.13% | 29.9B | 32.51 | $2.30 | +0.27% |
| WFRD | $110.18 | +7.04% | 7.8B | 16.99 | $6.39 | +0.94% |
| NOV | $20.58 | +1.78% | 7.4B | 52.54 | $0.39 | +2.57% |
| AROC | $37.53 | +3.69% | 6.5B | 20.39 | $1.83 | +2.22% |
| VAL | $96.13 | +6.43% | 6.3B | 6.58 | $13.86 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
NR vs SLB Comparison April 2026
NR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NR stands at 627.1M. In comparison, SLB has a market cap of 84.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NR is priced at $7.25, while SLB trades at $55.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas SLB's P/E ratio is 23.89. In terms of profitability, NR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SLB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NR is more volatile compared to SLB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NR.Check SLB's competition here
NR vs BKR Comparison April 2026
NR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NR stands at 627.1M. In comparison, BKR has a market cap of 68.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NR is priced at $7.25, while BKR trades at $68.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas BKR's P/E ratio is 22.03. In terms of profitability, NR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BKR's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NR is more volatile compared to BKR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NR.Check BKR's competition here
NR vs TS Comparison April 2026
NR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NR stands at 627.1M. In comparison, TS has a market cap of 34B. Regarding current trading prices, NR is priced at $7.25, while TS trades at $62.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas TS's P/E ratio is 17.29. In terms of profitability, NR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NR is more volatile compared to TS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NR.Check TS's competition here
NR vs HAL Comparison April 2026
NR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NR stands at 627.1M. In comparison, HAL has a market cap of 33.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NR is priced at $7.25, while HAL trades at $40.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas HAL's P/E ratio is 22.28. In terms of profitability, NR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HAL's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NR is more volatile compared to HAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NR.Check HAL's competition here
NR vs FTI Comparison April 2026
NR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NR stands at 627.1M. In comparison, FTI has a market cap of 29.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NR is priced at $7.25, while FTI trades at $74.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas FTI's P/E ratio is 32.51. In terms of profitability, NR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FTI's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, NR is more volatile compared to FTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NR.Check FTI's competition here
NR vs WFRD Comparison April 2026
NR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NR stands at 627.1M. In comparison, WFRD has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NR is priced at $7.25, while WFRD trades at $110.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas WFRD's P/E ratio is 16.99. In terms of profitability, NR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WFRD's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, NR is more volatile compared to WFRD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NR.Check WFRD's competition here
NR vs NOV Comparison April 2026
NR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NR stands at 627.1M. In comparison, NOV has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NR is priced at $7.25, while NOV trades at $20.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas NOV's P/E ratio is 52.54. In terms of profitability, NR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NOV's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NR is more volatile compared to NOV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NR.Check NOV's competition here
NR vs AROC Comparison April 2026
NR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NR stands at 627.1M. In comparison, AROC has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NR is priced at $7.25, while AROC trades at $37.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas AROC's P/E ratio is 20.39. In terms of profitability, NR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AROC's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, NR is more volatile compared to AROC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NR.Check AROC's competition here
NR vs VAL Comparison April 2026
NR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NR stands at 627.1M. In comparison, VAL has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NR is priced at $7.25, while VAL trades at $96.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas VAL's P/E ratio is 6.58. In terms of profitability, NR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VAL's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, NR is more volatile compared to VAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NR.Check VAL's competition here
NR vs KGS Comparison April 2026
NR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NR stands at 627.1M. In comparison, KGS has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NR is priced at $7.25, while KGS trades at $65.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas KGS's P/E ratio is 74.16. In terms of profitability, NR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KGS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NR is more volatile compared to KGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NR.Check KGS's competition here
NR vs LB Comparison April 2026
NR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NR stands at 627.1M. In comparison, LB has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NR is priced at $7.25, while LB trades at $69.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas LB's P/E ratio is 72.65. In terms of profitability, NR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NR is more volatile compared to LB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NR.Check LB's competition here
NR vs LBRT Comparison April 2026
NR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NR stands at 627.1M. In comparison, LBRT has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NR is priced at $7.25, while LBRT trades at $32.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas LBRT's P/E ratio is 35.97. In terms of profitability, NR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LBRT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NR is more volatile compared to LBRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NR.Check LBRT's competition here
NR vs SEI Comparison April 2026
NR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NR stands at 627.1M. In comparison, SEI has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NR is priced at $7.25, while SEI trades at $69.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas SEI's P/E ratio is 109.65. In terms of profitability, NR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SEI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NR is less volatile compared to SEI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NR.Check SEI's competition here
NR vs CHX Comparison April 2026
NR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NR stands at 627.1M. In comparison, CHX has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NR is priced at $7.25, while CHX trades at $25.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas CHX's P/E ratio is 17.09. In terms of profitability, NR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CHX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NR is more volatile compared to CHX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NR.Check CHX's competition here
NR vs TDW Comparison April 2026
NR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NR stands at 627.1M. In comparison, TDW has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NR is priced at $7.25, while TDW trades at $90.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas TDW's P/E ratio is 13.34. In terms of profitability, NR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TDW's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, NR is more volatile compared to TDW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NR.Check TDW's competition here
NR vs WHD Comparison April 2026
NR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NR stands at 627.1M. In comparison, WHD has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NR is priced at $7.25, while WHD trades at $56.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas WHD's P/E ratio is 23.56. In terms of profitability, NR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WHD's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NR is more volatile compared to WHD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NR.Check WHD's competition here
NR vs OII Comparison April 2026
NR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NR stands at 627.1M. In comparison, OII has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NR is priced at $7.25, while OII trades at $37.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas OII's P/E ratio is 11.12. In terms of profitability, NR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to OII's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, NR is more volatile compared to OII. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NR.Check OII's competition here
NR vs USAC Comparison April 2026
NR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NR stands at 627.1M. In comparison, USAC has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NR is priced at $7.25, while USAC trades at $26.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas USAC's P/E ratio is 32.38. In terms of profitability, NR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to USAC's ROE of -1.79%. Regarding short-term risk, NR is more volatile compared to USAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NR.Check USAC's competition here
NR vs EFXT Comparison April 2026
NR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NR stands at 627.1M. In comparison, EFXT has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NR is priced at $7.25, while EFXT trades at $25.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas EFXT's P/E ratio is 49.38. In terms of profitability, NR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EFXT's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NR is more volatile compared to EFXT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NR.Check EFXT's competition here
NR vs CAM Comparison April 2026
NR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NR stands at 627.1M. In comparison, CAM has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NR is priced at $7.25, while CAM trades at $66.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas CAM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CAM's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NR is more volatile compared to CAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NR.Check CAM's competition here
NR vs TDW-WT Comparison April 2026
NR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NR stands at 627.1M. In comparison, TDW-WT has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NR is priced at $7.25, while TDW-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas TDW-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TDW-WT's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, NR is more volatile compared to TDW-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NR.Check TDW-WT's competition here
NR vs NESR Comparison April 2026
NR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NR stands at 627.1M. In comparison, NESR has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NR is priced at $7.25, while NESR trades at $24.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas NESR's P/E ratio is 47.00. In terms of profitability, NR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NESR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NR is more volatile compared to NESR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NR.Check NESR's competition here
NR vs NEX Comparison April 2026
NR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NR stands at 627.1M. In comparison, NEX has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NR is priced at $7.25, while NEX trades at $10.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas NEX's P/E ratio is 3.94. In terms of profitability, NR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NEX's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, NR is more volatile compared to NEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NR.Check NEX's competition here
NR vs FLOC Comparison April 2026
NR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NR stands at 627.1M. In comparison, FLOC has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NR is priced at $7.25, while FLOC trades at $23.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas FLOC's P/E ratio is 19.40. In terms of profitability, NR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FLOC's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, NR is more volatile compared to FLOC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NR.Check FLOC's competition here
NR vs PUMP Comparison April 2026
NR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NR stands at 627.1M. In comparison, PUMP has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NR is priced at $7.25, while PUMP trades at $16.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas PUMP's P/E ratio is 1700.50. In terms of profitability, NR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PUMP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NR is more volatile compared to PUMP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NR.Check PUMP's competition here
NR vs AESI Comparison April 2026
NR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NR stands at 627.1M. In comparison, AESI has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, NR is priced at $7.25, while AESI trades at $16.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas AESI's P/E ratio is -39.76. In terms of profitability, NR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AESI's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NR is more volatile compared to AESI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NR.Check AESI's competition here
NR vs XPRO Comparison April 2026
NR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NR stands at 627.1M. In comparison, XPRO has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, NR is priced at $7.25, while XPRO trades at $17.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas XPRO's P/E ratio is 39.44. In terms of profitability, NR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to XPRO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NR is more volatile compared to XPRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NR.Check XPRO's competition here
NR vs INVX Comparison April 2026
NR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NR stands at 627.1M. In comparison, INVX has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NR is priced at $7.25, while INVX trades at $28.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas INVX's P/E ratio is 23.26. In terms of profitability, NR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to INVX's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NR is more volatile compared to INVX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NR.Check INVX's competition here
NR vs RES Comparison April 2026
NR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NR stands at 627.1M. In comparison, RES has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NR is priced at $7.25, while RES trades at $7.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas RES's P/E ratio is 53.37. In terms of profitability, NR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RES's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NR is more volatile compared to RES. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NR.Check RES's competition here
NR vs DNOW Comparison April 2026
NR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NR stands at 627.1M. In comparison, DNOW has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NR is priced at $7.25, while DNOW trades at $12.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas DNOW's P/E ratio is -16.72. In terms of profitability, NR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DNOW's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NR is more volatile compared to DNOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NR.Check DNOW's competition here
NR vs HLX Comparison April 2026
NR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NR stands at 627.1M. In comparison, HLX has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NR is priced at $7.25, while HLX trades at $9.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas HLX's P/E ratio is 99.00. In terms of profitability, NR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HLX's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NR is more volatile compared to HLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NR.Check HLX's competition here
NR vs VTOL Comparison April 2026
NR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NR stands at 627.1M. In comparison, VTOL has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NR is priced at $7.25, while VTOL trades at $49.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas VTOL's P/E ratio is 11.25. In terms of profitability, NR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VTOL's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NR is more volatile compared to VTOL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NR.Check VTOL's competition here
NR vs ACDC Comparison April 2026
NR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NR stands at 627.1M. In comparison, ACDC has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NR is priced at $7.25, while ACDC trades at $7.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas ACDC's P/E ratio is -3.32. In terms of profitability, NR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ACDC's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, NR is more volatile compared to ACDC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NR.Check ACDC's competition here
NR vs TTI Comparison April 2026
NR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NR stands at 627.1M. In comparison, TTI has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NR is priced at $7.25, while TTI trades at $9.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas TTI's P/E ratio is 323.17. In terms of profitability, NR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TTI's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NR is more volatile compared to TTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NR.Check TTI's competition here
NR vs NPKI Comparison April 2026
NR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NR stands at 627.1M. In comparison, NPKI has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NR is priced at $7.25, while NPKI trades at $15.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas NPKI's P/E ratio is 35.94. In terms of profitability, NR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NPKI's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NR is more volatile compared to NPKI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NR.Check NPKI's competition here
NR vs SLCA Comparison April 2026
NR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NR stands at 627.1M. In comparison, SLCA has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NR is priced at $7.25, while SLCA trades at $15.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas SLCA's P/E ratio is 10.54. In terms of profitability, NR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SLCA's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NR is more volatile compared to SLCA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NR.Check SLCA's competition here
NR vs PFHC Comparison April 2026
NR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NR stands at 627.1M. In comparison, PFHC has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NR is priced at $7.25, while PFHC trades at $22.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas PFHC's P/E ratio is 105.14. In terms of profitability, NR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PFHC's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, NR is more volatile compared to PFHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NR.Check PFHC's competition here
NR vs MRC Comparison April 2026
NR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NR stands at 627.1M. In comparison, MRC has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NR is priced at $7.25, while MRC trades at $13.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas MRC's P/E ratio is 59.91. In terms of profitability, NR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MRC's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NR is less volatile compared to MRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NR.Check MRC's competition here
NR vs VAL-WT Comparison April 2026
NR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NR stands at 627.1M. In comparison, VAL-WT has a market cap of 988.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NR is priced at $7.25, while VAL-WT trades at $16.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas VAL-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VAL-WT's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, NR is less volatile compared to VAL-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NR.Check VAL-WT's competition here
NR vs HMH Comparison April 2026
NR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NR stands at 627.1M. In comparison, HMH has a market cap of 867.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NR is priced at $7.25, while HMH trades at $20.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas HMH's P/E ratio is 27.20. In terms of profitability, NR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HMH's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NR is less volatile compared to HMH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NR.Check HMH's competition here
NR vs CLB Comparison April 2026
NR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NR stands at 627.1M. In comparison, CLB has a market cap of 804.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NR is priced at $7.25, while CLB trades at $17.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas CLB's P/E ratio is 27.73. In terms of profitability, NR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CLB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NR is more volatile compared to CLB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NR.Check CLB's competition here
NR vs NESRW Comparison April 2026
NR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NR stands at 627.1M. In comparison, NESRW has a market cap of 709.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NR is priced at $7.25, while NESRW trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas NESRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NESRW's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NR is less volatile compared to NESRW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NR.Check NESRW's competition here
NR vs FET Comparison April 2026
NR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NR stands at 627.1M. In comparison, FET has a market cap of 703.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NR is priced at $7.25, while FET trades at $62.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas FET's P/E ratio is -76.62. In terms of profitability, NR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FET's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NR is more volatile compared to FET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NR.Check FET's competition here
NR vs OIS Comparison April 2026
NR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NR stands at 627.1M. In comparison, OIS has a market cap of 665.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NR is priced at $7.25, while OIS trades at $11.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas OIS's P/E ratio is -5.94. In terms of profitability, NR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to OIS's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NR is more volatile compared to OIS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NR.Check OIS's competition here
NR vs DRQ Comparison April 2026
NR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NR stands at 627.1M. In comparison, DRQ has a market cap of 530.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NR is priced at $7.25, while DRQ trades at $15.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas DRQ's P/E ratio is -19.76. In terms of profitability, NR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DRQ's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NR is more volatile compared to DRQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NR.Check DRQ's competition here
NR vs FTK Comparison April 2026
NR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NR stands at 627.1M. In comparison, FTK has a market cap of 512.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NR is priced at $7.25, while FTK trades at $17.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas FTK's P/E ratio is 20.26. In terms of profitability, NR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FTK's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, NR is more volatile compared to FTK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NR.Check FTK's competition here
NR vs NGS Comparison April 2026
NR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NR stands at 627.1M. In comparison, NGS has a market cap of 498.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NR is priced at $7.25, while NGS trades at $39.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas NGS's P/E ratio is 25.25. In terms of profitability, NR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NGS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NR is more volatile compared to NGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NR.Check NGS's competition here
NR vs SOI Comparison April 2026
NR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NR stands at 627.1M. In comparison, SOI has a market cap of 498.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NR is priced at $7.25, while SOI trades at $11.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas SOI's P/E ratio is 17.15. In terms of profitability, NR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SOI's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NR is more volatile compared to SOI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NR.Check SOI's competition here
NR vs RNGR Comparison April 2026
NR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NR stands at 627.1M. In comparison, RNGR has a market cap of 438.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NR is priced at $7.25, while RNGR trades at $18.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas RNGR's P/E ratio is 33.94. In terms of profitability, NR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RNGR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NR is more volatile compared to RNGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NR.Check RNGR's competition here
NR vs NOA Comparison April 2026
NR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NR stands at 627.1M. In comparison, NOA has a market cap of 419.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NR is priced at $7.25, while NOA trades at $14.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas NOA's P/E ratio is 17.48. In terms of profitability, NR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NOA's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NR is more volatile compared to NOA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NR.Check NOA's competition here
NR vs NINE Comparison April 2026
NR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NR stands at 627.1M. In comparison, NINE has a market cap of 402.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NR is priced at $7.25, while NINE trades at $9.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas NINE's P/E ratio is -7.44. In terms of profitability, NR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NINE's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, NR is more volatile compared to NINE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NR.Check NINE's competition here
NR vs CCLP Comparison April 2026
NR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NR stands at 627.1M. In comparison, CCLP has a market cap of 344.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NR is priced at $7.25, while CCLP trades at $2.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas CCLP's P/E ratio is -34.57. In terms of profitability, NR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CCLP's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, NR is more volatile compared to CCLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NR.Check CCLP's competition here
NR vs SND Comparison April 2026
NR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NR stands at 627.1M. In comparison, SND has a market cap of 208.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NR is priced at $7.25, while SND trades at $5.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas SND's P/E ratio is 174.67. In terms of profitability, NR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SND's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NR is more volatile compared to SND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NR.Check SND's competition here
NR vs NCSM Comparison April 2026
NR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NR stands at 627.1M. In comparison, NCSM has a market cap of 206.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NR is priced at $7.25, while NCSM trades at $77.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas NCSM's P/E ratio is 9.11. In terms of profitability, NR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NCSM's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NR is more volatile compared to NCSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NR.Check NCSM's competition here
NR vs OMSE Comparison April 2026
NR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NR stands at 627.1M. In comparison, OMSE has a market cap of 199.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NR is priced at $7.25, while OMSE trades at $5.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas OMSE's P/E ratio is 6.83. In terms of profitability, NR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to OMSE's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, NR is more volatile compared to OMSE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NR.Check OMSE's competition here
NR vs BOOM Comparison April 2026
NR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NR stands at 627.1M. In comparison, BOOM has a market cap of 131.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NR is priced at $7.25, while BOOM trades at $6.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas BOOM's P/E ratio is -7.12. In terms of profitability, NR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BOOM's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NR is more volatile compared to BOOM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NR.Check BOOM's competition here
NR vs GEOS Comparison April 2026
NR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NR stands at 627.1M. In comparison, GEOS has a market cap of 130.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NR is priced at $7.25, while GEOS trades at $10.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas GEOS's P/E ratio is -4.66. In terms of profitability, NR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GEOS's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, NR is more volatile compared to GEOS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NR.Check GEOS's competition here
NR vs PFIE Comparison April 2026
NR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NR stands at 627.1M. In comparison, PFIE has a market cap of 117.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NR is priced at $7.25, while PFIE trades at $2.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas PFIE's P/E ratio is 13.37. In terms of profitability, NR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PFIE's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NR is more volatile compared to PFIE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NR.Check PFIE's competition here
NR vs DTI Comparison April 2026
NR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NR stands at 627.1M. In comparison, DTI has a market cap of 116.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NR is priced at $7.25, while DTI trades at $3.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas DTI's P/E ratio is -30.18. In terms of profitability, NR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DTI's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NR is more volatile compared to DTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NR.Check DTI's competition here
NR vs DWSN Comparison April 2026
NR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NR stands at 627.1M. In comparison, DWSN has a market cap of 100.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NR is priced at $7.25, while DWSN trades at $3.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas DWSN's P/E ratio is -54.00. In terms of profitability, NR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DWSN's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NR is less volatile compared to DWSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NR.Check DWSN's competition here
NR vs LSE Comparison April 2026
NR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NR stands at 627.1M. In comparison, LSE has a market cap of 89.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NR is priced at $7.25, while LSE trades at $5.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas LSE's P/E ratio is 65.63. In terms of profitability, NR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LSE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NR is more volatile compared to LSE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NR.Check LSE's competition here
NR vs KLXE Comparison April 2026
NR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NR stands at 627.1M. In comparison, KLXE has a market cap of 65.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NR is priced at $7.25, while KLXE trades at $3.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas KLXE's P/E ratio is -0.81. In terms of profitability, NR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KLXE's ROE of +1.47%. Regarding short-term risk, NR is more volatile compared to KLXE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NR.Check KLXE's competition here
NR vs SDPI Comparison April 2026
NR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NR stands at 627.1M. In comparison, SDPI has a market cap of 30.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NR is priced at $7.25, while SDPI trades at $1.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas SDPI's P/E ratio is 7.21. In terms of profitability, NR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SDPI's ROE of +0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, NR is more volatile compared to SDPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NR.Check SDPI's competition here
NR vs RCON Comparison April 2026
NR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NR stands at 627.1M. In comparison, RCON has a market cap of 30.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NR is priced at $7.25, while RCON trades at $0.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas RCON's P/E ratio is -2.27. In terms of profitability, NR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RCON's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NR is more volatile compared to RCON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NR.Check RCON's competition here
NR vs STAK Comparison April 2026
NR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NR stands at 627.1M. In comparison, STAK has a market cap of 9.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NR is priced at $7.25, while STAK trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas STAK's P/E ratio is -1.63. In terms of profitability, NR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to STAK's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, NR is less volatile compared to STAK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NR.Check STAK's competition here
NR vs ENSV Comparison April 2026
NR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NR stands at 627.1M. In comparison, ENSV has a market cap of 49.5K. Regarding current trading prices, NR is priced at $7.25, while ENSV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas ENSV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ENSV's ROE of -28.53%. Regarding short-term risk, NR is less volatile compared to ENSV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NR.Check ENSV's competition here
NR vs TDW-WTA Comparison April 2026
NR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NR stands at 627.1M. In comparison, TDW-WTA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NR is priced at $7.25, while TDW-WTA trades at $2.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas TDW-WTA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TDW-WTA's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, NR is less volatile compared to TDW-WTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NR.Check TDW-WTA's competition here
NR vs FTSI Comparison April 2026
NR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NR stands at 627.1M. In comparison, FTSI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NR is priced at $7.25, while FTSI trades at $26.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas FTSI's P/E ratio is 4.67. In terms of profitability, NR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FTSI's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NR is more volatile compared to FTSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NR.Check FTSI's competition here
NR vs IO Comparison April 2026
NR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NR stands at 627.1M. In comparison, IO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NR is priced at $7.25, while IO trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas IO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to IO's ROE of +0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, NR is less volatile compared to IO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NR.Check IO's competition here
NR vs CELP Comparison April 2026
NR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NR stands at 627.1M. In comparison, CELP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NR is priced at $7.25, while CELP trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas CELP's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, NR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CELP's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NR is less volatile compared to CELP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NR.Check CELP's competition here
NR vs ACDCW Comparison April 2026
NR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NR stands at 627.1M. In comparison, ACDCW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NR is priced at $7.25, while ACDCW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas ACDCW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ACDCW's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, NR is less volatile compared to ACDCW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NR.Check ACDCW's competition here
NR vs USWS Comparison April 2026
NR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NR stands at 627.1M. In comparison, USWS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NR is priced at $7.25, while USWS trades at $7.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas USWS's P/E ratio is -3.94. In terms of profitability, NR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to USWS's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NR is more volatile compared to USWS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NR.Check USWS's competition here
NR vs EXTN Comparison April 2026
NR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NR stands at 627.1M. In comparison, EXTN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NR is priced at $7.25, while EXTN trades at $4.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas EXTN's P/E ratio is -1.35. In terms of profitability, NR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EXTN's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, NR is more volatile compared to EXTN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NR.Check EXTN's competition here
NR vs CETC Comparison April 2026
NR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NR stands at 627.1M. In comparison, CETC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NR is priced at $7.25, while CETC trades at $4.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas CETC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CETC's ROE of -1.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NR is less volatile compared to CETC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NR.Check CETC's competition here
NR vs TDW-WTB Comparison April 2026
NR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NR stands at 627.1M. In comparison, TDW-WTB has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NR is priced at $7.25, while TDW-WTB trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas TDW-WTB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TDW-WTB's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, NR is less volatile compared to TDW-WTB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NR.Check TDW-WTB's competition here
NR vs GLF Comparison April 2026
NR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NR stands at 627.1M. In comparison, GLF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NR is priced at $7.25, while GLF trades at $28.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas GLF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GLF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NR is less volatile compared to GLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NR.Check GLF's competition here
NR vs APLP Comparison April 2026
NR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NR stands at 627.1M. In comparison, APLP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NR is priced at $7.25, while APLP trades at $15.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas APLP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to APLP's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, NR is more volatile compared to APLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NR.Check APLP's competition here
NR vs VLI Comparison April 2026
NR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NR stands at 627.1M. In comparison, VLI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NR is priced at $7.25, while VLI trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas VLI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VLI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NR is less volatile compared to VLI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NR.Check VLI's competition here
NR vs USWSW Comparison April 2026
NR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NR stands at 627.1M. In comparison, USWSW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NR is priced at $7.25, while USWSW trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.08, whereas USWSW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to USWSW's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NR is less volatile compared to USWSW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NR.Check USWSW's competition here