North American Construction Group Ltd. (NOA) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (NOA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Oil & Gas Equipment & Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NOA | $12.91 | +0.00% | 349.9M | 23.76 | $0.54 | +2.68% |
| SLB | $45.13 | +0.09% | 67.5B | 16.53 | $2.73 | +2.57% |
| BKR | $52.78 | -1.93% | 52.4B | 19.77 | $2.67 | +1.74% |
| TS | $54.13 | -0.11% | 29B | 14.32 | $3.78 | +3.29% |
| HAL | $32.96 | -0.15% | 27.5B | 13.91 | $2.37 | +2.06% |
| FTI | $66.75 | +2.52% | 26.6B | 24.10 | $2.77 | +0.30% |
| KGS | $67.94 | -6.16% | 6.9B | 46.86 | $1.45 | +2.83% |
| NOV | $18.02 | -0.44% | 6.5B | 31.61 | $0.57 | +2.33% |
| AROC | $36.79 | -5.08% | 6.4B | 19.16 | $1.92 | +2.34% |
| WFRD | $83.01 | +3.49% | 6B | 12.99 | $6.39 | +1.26% |
Stock Comparison
NOA vs SLB Comparison July 2026
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 349.9M. In comparison, SLB has a market cap of 67.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $12.91, while SLB trades at $45.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 23.76, whereas SLB's P/E ratio is 16.53. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SLB's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is more volatile compared to SLB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check SLB's competition here
NOA vs BKR Comparison July 2026
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 349.9M. In comparison, BKR has a market cap of 52.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $12.91, while BKR trades at $52.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 23.76, whereas BKR's P/E ratio is 19.77. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BKR's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is less volatile compared to BKR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check BKR's competition here
NOA vs TS Comparison July 2026
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 349.9M. In comparison, TS has a market cap of 29B. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $12.91, while TS trades at $54.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 23.76, whereas TS's P/E ratio is 14.32. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is more volatile compared to TS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check TS's competition here
NOA vs HAL Comparison July 2026
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 349.9M. In comparison, HAL has a market cap of 27.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $12.91, while HAL trades at $32.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 23.76, whereas HAL's P/E ratio is 13.91. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HAL's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is more volatile compared to HAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check HAL's competition here
NOA vs FTI Comparison July 2026
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 349.9M. In comparison, FTI has a market cap of 26.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $12.91, while FTI trades at $66.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 23.76, whereas FTI's P/E ratio is 24.10. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FTI's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is more volatile compared to FTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check FTI's competition here
NOA vs KGS Comparison July 2026
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 349.9M. In comparison, KGS has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $12.91, while KGS trades at $67.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 23.76, whereas KGS's P/E ratio is 46.86. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KGS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is less volatile compared to KGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check KGS's competition here
NOA vs NOV Comparison July 2026
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 349.9M. In comparison, NOV has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $12.91, while NOV trades at $18.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 23.76, whereas NOV's P/E ratio is 31.61. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NOV's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is more volatile compared to NOV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check NOV's competition here
NOA vs AROC Comparison July 2026
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 349.9M. In comparison, AROC has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $12.91, while AROC trades at $36.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 23.76, whereas AROC's P/E ratio is 19.16. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AROC's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is less volatile compared to AROC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check AROC's competition here
NOA vs WFRD Comparison July 2026
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 349.9M. In comparison, WFRD has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $12.91, while WFRD trades at $83.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 23.76, whereas WFRD's P/E ratio is 12.99. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to WFRD's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is more volatile compared to WFRD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check WFRD's competition here
NOA vs LB Comparison July 2026
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 349.9M. In comparison, LB has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $12.91, while LB trades at $73.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 23.76, whereas LB's P/E ratio is 76.03. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LB's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is less volatile compared to LB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check LB's competition here
NOA vs CHX Comparison July 2026
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 349.9M. In comparison, CHX has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $12.91, while CHX trades at $25.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 23.76, whereas CHX's P/E ratio is 17.09. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CHX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is more volatile compared to CHX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check CHX's competition here
NOA vs SEI Comparison July 2026
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 349.9M. In comparison, SEI has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $12.91, while SEI trades at $67.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 23.76, whereas SEI's P/E ratio is 46.34. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SEI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is less volatile compared to SEI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check SEI's competition here
NOA vs LBRT Comparison July 2026
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 349.9M. In comparison, LBRT has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $12.91, while LBRT trades at $23.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 23.76, whereas LBRT's P/E ratio is 36.05. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LBRT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is less volatile compared to LBRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check LBRT's competition here
NOA vs OII Comparison July 2026
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 349.9M. In comparison, OII has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $12.91, while OII trades at $38.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 23.76, whereas OII's P/E ratio is 21.51. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to OII's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is less volatile compared to OII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check OII's competition here
NOA vs WHD Comparison July 2026
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 349.9M. In comparison, WHD has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $12.91, while WHD trades at $50.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 23.76, whereas WHD's P/E ratio is 18.81. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to WHD's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is less volatile compared to WHD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check WHD's competition here
NOA vs TDW Comparison July 2026
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 349.9M. In comparison, TDW has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $12.91, while TDW trades at $68.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 23.76, whereas TDW's P/E ratio is 30.82. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TDW's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is more volatile compared to TDW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check TDW's competition here
NOA vs USAC Comparison July 2026
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 349.9M. In comparison, USAC has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $12.91, while USAC trades at $26.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 23.76, whereas USAC's P/E ratio is 27.18. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to USAC's ROE of +6.51%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is more volatile compared to USAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check USAC's competition here
NOA vs CAM Comparison July 2026
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 349.9M. In comparison, CAM has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $12.91, while CAM trades at $66.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 23.76, whereas CAM's P/E ratio is 25.34. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CAM's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is more volatile compared to CAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check CAM's competition here
NOA vs EFXT Comparison July 2026
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 349.9M. In comparison, EFXT has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $12.91, while EFXT trades at $23.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 23.76, whereas EFXT's P/E ratio is 17.22. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EFXT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is less volatile compared to EFXT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check EFXT's competition here
NOA vs NESR Comparison July 2026
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 349.9M. In comparison, NESR has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $12.91, while NESR trades at $27.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 23.76, whereas NESR's P/E ratio is 29.37. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NESR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is less volatile compared to NESR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check NESR's competition here
NOA vs TDW-WT Comparison July 2026
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 349.9M. In comparison, TDW-WT has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $12.91, while TDW-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 23.76, whereas TDW-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TDW-WT's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is more volatile compared to TDW-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check TDW-WT's competition here
NOA vs NEX Comparison July 2026
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 349.9M. In comparison, NEX has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $12.91, while NEX trades at $10.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 23.76, whereas NEX's P/E ratio is 3.94. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NEX's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is less volatile compared to NEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check NEX's competition here
NOA vs EROK Comparison July 2026
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 349.9M. In comparison, EROK has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $12.91, while EROK trades at $20.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 23.76, whereas EROK's P/E ratio is 2051.00. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EROK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is less volatile compared to EROK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check EROK's competition here
NOA vs FLOC Comparison July 2026
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 349.9M. In comparison, FLOC has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $12.91, while FLOC trades at $20.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 23.76, whereas FLOC's P/E ratio is 6.78. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FLOC's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is more volatile compared to FLOC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check FLOC's competition here
NOA vs WTTR Comparison July 2026
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 349.9M. In comparison, WTTR has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $12.91, while WTTR trades at $17.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 23.76, whereas WTTR's P/E ratio is 87.08. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to WTTR's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is less volatile compared to WTTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check WTTR's competition here
NOA vs AESI Comparison July 2026
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 349.9M. In comparison, AESI has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $12.91, while AESI trades at $14.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 23.76, whereas AESI's P/E ratio is -19.17. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AESI's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is less volatile compared to AESI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check AESI's competition here
NOA vs INVX Comparison July 2026
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 349.9M. In comparison, INVX has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $12.91, while INVX trades at $24.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 23.76, whereas INVX's P/E ratio is 24.09. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to INVX's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is less volatile compared to INVX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check INVX's competition here
NOA vs XPRO Comparison July 2026
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 349.9M. In comparison, XPRO has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $12.91, while XPRO trades at $14.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 23.76, whereas XPRO's P/E ratio is 26.59. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to XPRO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is less volatile compared to XPRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check XPRO's competition here
NOA vs DNOW Comparison July 2026
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 349.9M. In comparison, DNOW has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $12.91, while DNOW trades at $12.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 23.76, whereas DNOW's P/E ratio is 18.26. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DNOW's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is more volatile compared to DNOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check DNOW's competition here
NOA vs PUMP Comparison July 2026
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 349.9M. In comparison, PUMP has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $12.91, while PUMP trades at $12.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 23.76, whereas PUMP's P/E ratio is -109.91. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PUMP's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is less volatile compared to PUMP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check PUMP's competition here
NOA vs TTI Comparison July 2026
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 349.9M. In comparison, TTI has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $12.91, while TTI trades at $9.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 23.76, whereas TTI's P/E ratio is 44.29. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TTI's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is less volatile compared to TTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check TTI's competition here
NOA vs HLX Comparison July 2026
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 349.9M. In comparison, HLX has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $12.91, while HLX trades at $8.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 23.76, whereas HLX's P/E ratio is 42.70. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HLX's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is more volatile compared to HLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check HLX's competition here
NOA vs RES Comparison July 2026
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 349.9M. In comparison, RES has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $12.91, while RES trades at $5.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 23.76, whereas RES's P/E ratio is 23.33. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RES's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is less volatile compared to RES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check RES's competition here
NOA vs VTOL Comparison July 2026
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 349.9M. In comparison, VTOL has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $12.91, while VTOL trades at $41.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 23.76, whereas VTOL's P/E ratio is 10.78. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VTOL's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is more volatile compared to VTOL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check VTOL's competition here
NOA vs SLCA Comparison July 2026
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 349.9M. In comparison, SLCA has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $12.91, while SLCA trades at $15.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 23.76, whereas SLCA's P/E ratio is 10.54. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SLCA's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is more volatile compared to SLCA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check SLCA's competition here
NOA vs NPKI Comparison July 2026
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 349.9M. In comparison, NPKI has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $12.91, while NPKI trades at $14.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 23.76, whereas NPKI's P/E ratio is 33.28. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NPKI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is less volatile compared to NPKI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check NPKI's competition here
NOA vs PFHC Comparison July 2026
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 349.9M. In comparison, PFHC has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $12.91, while PFHC trades at $22.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 23.76, whereas PFHC's P/E ratio is 105.14. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PFHC's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is less volatile compared to PFHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check PFHC's competition here
NOA vs MRC Comparison July 2026
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 349.9M. In comparison, MRC has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $12.91, while MRC trades at $13.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 23.76, whereas MRC's P/E ratio is 59.91. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MRC's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is less volatile compared to MRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check MRC's competition here
NOA vs ACDC Comparison July 2026
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 349.9M. In comparison, ACDC has a market cap of 931.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $12.91, while ACDC trades at $5.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 23.76, whereas ACDC's P/E ratio is -2.29. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ACDC's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is less volatile compared to ACDC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check ACDC's competition here
NOA vs HMH Comparison July 2026
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 349.9M. In comparison, HMH has a market cap of 808.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $12.91, while HMH trades at $18.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 23.76, whereas HMH's P/E ratio is 72.39. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HMH's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is less volatile compared to HMH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check HMH's competition here
NOA vs NESRW Comparison July 2026
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 349.9M. In comparison, NESRW has a market cap of 709.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $12.91, while NESRW trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 23.76, whereas NESRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NESRW's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is less volatile compared to NESRW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check NESRW's competition here
NOA vs FTK Comparison July 2026
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 349.9M. In comparison, FTK has a market cap of 668.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $12.91, while FTK trades at $22.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 23.76, whereas FTK's P/E ratio is 39.63. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FTK's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is less volatile compared to FTK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check FTK's competition here
NOA vs VAL-WT Comparison July 2026
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 349.9M. In comparison, VAL-WT has a market cap of 646.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $12.91, while VAL-WT trades at $9.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 23.76, whereas VAL-WT's P/E ratio is 0.42. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VAL-WT's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is less volatile compared to VAL-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check VAL-WT's competition here
NOA vs NR Comparison July 2026
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 349.9M. In comparison, NR has a market cap of 627.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $12.91, while NR trades at $7.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 23.76, whereas NR's P/E ratio is 19.08. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is less volatile compared to NR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check NR's competition here
NOA vs FET Comparison July 2026
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 349.9M. In comparison, FET has a market cap of 531.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $12.91, while FET trades at $46.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 23.76, whereas FET's P/E ratio is 44.74. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FET's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is less volatile compared to FET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check FET's competition here
NOA vs DRQ Comparison July 2026
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 349.9M. In comparison, DRQ has a market cap of 530.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $12.91, while DRQ trades at $15.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 23.76, whereas DRQ's P/E ratio is -19.76. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DRQ's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is less volatile compared to DRQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check DRQ's competition here
NOA vs CLB Comparison July 2026
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 349.9M. In comparison, CLB has a market cap of 528.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $12.91, while CLB trades at $11.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 23.76, whereas CLB's P/E ratio is 16.85. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CLB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is less volatile compared to CLB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check CLB's competition here
NOA vs NINE Comparison July 2026
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 349.9M. In comparison, NINE has a market cap of 505M. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $12.91, while NINE trades at $11.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 23.76, whereas NINE's P/E ratio is 5.58. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NINE's ROE of -1.57%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is less volatile compared to NINE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check NINE's competition here
NOA vs SOI Comparison July 2026
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 349.9M. In comparison, SOI has a market cap of 498.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $12.91, while SOI trades at $11.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 23.76, whereas SOI's P/E ratio is 17.15. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SOI's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is less volatile compared to SOI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check SOI's competition here
NOA vs NGS Comparison July 2026
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 349.9M. In comparison, NGS has a market cap of 497.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $12.91, while NGS trades at $39.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 23.76, whereas NGS's P/E ratio is 22.94. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NGS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is less volatile compared to NGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check NGS's competition here
NOA vs OIS Comparison July 2026
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 349.9M. In comparison, OIS has a market cap of 464.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $12.91, while OIS trades at $7.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 23.76, whereas OIS's P/E ratio is 19.79. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to OIS's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is less volatile compared to OIS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check OIS's competition here
NOA vs RNGR Comparison July 2026
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 349.9M. In comparison, RNGR has a market cap of 366.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $12.91, while RNGR trades at $15.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 23.76, whereas RNGR's P/E ratio is 24.48. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RNGR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is less volatile compared to RNGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check RNGR's competition here
NOA vs CCLP Comparison July 2026
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 349.9M. In comparison, CCLP has a market cap of 344.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $12.91, while CCLP trades at $2.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 23.76, whereas CCLP's P/E ratio is -34.57. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CCLP's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is less volatile compared to CCLP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check CCLP's competition here
NOA vs SND Comparison July 2026
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 349.9M. In comparison, SND has a market cap of 202M. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $12.91, while SND trades at $4.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 23.76, whereas SND's P/E ratio is -903121845275436672.00. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SND's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is less volatile compared to SND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check SND's competition here
NOA vs DWSN Comparison July 2026
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 349.9M. In comparison, DWSN has a market cap of 182.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $12.91, while DWSN trades at $5.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 23.76, whereas DWSN's P/E ratio is 39.27. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DWSN's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is less volatile compared to DWSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check DWSN's competition here
NOA vs OMSE Comparison July 2026
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 349.9M. In comparison, OMSE has a market cap of 164.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $12.91, while OMSE trades at $3.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 23.76, whereas OMSE's P/E ratio is 12.52. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to OMSE's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is less volatile compared to OMSE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check OMSE's competition here
NOA vs BOOM Comparison July 2026
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 349.9M. In comparison, BOOM has a market cap of 125.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $12.91, while BOOM trades at $6.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 23.76, whereas BOOM's P/E ratio is -8.27. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BOOM's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is less volatile compared to BOOM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check BOOM's competition here
NOA vs PFIE Comparison July 2026
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 349.9M. In comparison, PFIE has a market cap of 117.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $12.91, while PFIE trades at $2.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 23.76, whereas PFIE's P/E ratio is 13.37. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PFIE's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is more volatile compared to PFIE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check PFIE's competition here
NOA vs NCSM Comparison July 2026
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 349.9M. In comparison, NCSM has a market cap of 117M. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $12.91, while NCSM trades at $44.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 23.76, whereas NCSM's P/E ratio is 14.07. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NCSM's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is more volatile compared to NCSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check NCSM's competition here
NOA vs GEOS Comparison July 2026
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 349.9M. In comparison, GEOS has a market cap of 86.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $12.91, while GEOS trades at $6.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 23.76, whereas GEOS's P/E ratio is -2.96. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GEOS's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is less volatile compared to GEOS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check GEOS's competition here
NOA vs LSE Comparison July 2026
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 349.9M. In comparison, LSE has a market cap of 76.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $12.91, while LSE trades at $4.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 23.76, whereas LSE's P/E ratio is 56.25. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LSE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is less volatile compared to LSE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check LSE's competition here
NOA vs DTI Comparison July 2026
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 349.9M. In comparison, DTI has a market cap of 73.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $12.91, while DTI trades at $2.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 23.76, whereas DTI's P/E ratio is 208.00. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DTI's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is less volatile compared to DTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check DTI's competition here
NOA vs KLXE Comparison July 2026
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 349.9M. In comparison, KLXE has a market cap of 48.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $12.91, while KLXE trades at $2.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 23.76, whereas KLXE's P/E ratio is -0.66. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KLXE's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is less volatile compared to KLXE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check KLXE's competition here
NOA vs STAK Comparison July 2026
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 349.9M. In comparison, STAK has a market cap of 43.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $12.91, while STAK trades at $4.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 23.76, whereas STAK's P/E ratio is -7.70. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to STAK's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is less volatile compared to STAK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check STAK's competition here
NOA vs SDPI Comparison July 2026
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 349.9M. In comparison, SDPI has a market cap of 30.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $12.91, while SDPI trades at $1.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 23.76, whereas SDPI's P/E ratio is 7.21. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SDPI's ROE of +0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is more volatile compared to SDPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check SDPI's competition here
NOA vs RCON Comparison July 2026
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 349.9M. In comparison, RCON has a market cap of 12.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $12.91, while RCON trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 23.76, whereas RCON's P/E ratio is -0.56. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RCON's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is more volatile compared to RCON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check RCON's competition here
NOA vs TDW-WTB Comparison July 2026
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 349.9M. In comparison, TDW-WTB has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $12.91, while TDW-WTB trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 23.76, whereas TDW-WTB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TDW-WTB's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is less volatile compared to TDW-WTB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check TDW-WTB's competition here
NOA vs IO Comparison July 2026
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 349.9M. In comparison, IO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $12.91, while IO trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 23.76, whereas IO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to IO's ROE of +0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is less volatile compared to IO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check IO's competition here
NOA vs APLP Comparison July 2026
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 349.9M. In comparison, APLP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $12.91, while APLP trades at $15.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 23.76, whereas APLP's P/E ratio is 17.69. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to APLP's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is more volatile compared to APLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check APLP's competition here
NOA vs VLI Comparison July 2026
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 349.9M. In comparison, VLI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $12.91, while VLI trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 23.76, whereas VLI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VLI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is less volatile compared to VLI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check VLI's competition here
NOA vs USWS Comparison July 2026
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 349.9M. In comparison, USWS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $12.91, while USWS trades at $7.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 23.76, whereas USWS's P/E ratio is -3.94. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to USWS's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is less volatile compared to USWS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check USWS's competition here
NOA vs EXTN Comparison July 2026
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 349.9M. In comparison, EXTN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $12.91, while EXTN trades at $4.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 23.76, whereas EXTN's P/E ratio is -1.35. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EXTN's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is less volatile compared to EXTN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check EXTN's competition here
NOA vs GLF Comparison July 2026
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 349.9M. In comparison, GLF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $12.91, while GLF trades at $28.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 23.76, whereas GLF's P/E ratio is 1.89. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GLF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is less volatile compared to GLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check GLF's competition here
NOA vs CETC Comparison July 2026
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 349.9M. In comparison, CETC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $12.91, while CETC trades at $4.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 23.76, whereas CETC's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CETC's ROE of -1.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is less volatile compared to CETC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check CETC's competition here
NOA vs CELP Comparison July 2026
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 349.9M. In comparison, CELP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $12.91, while CELP trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 23.76, whereas CELP's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CELP's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is less volatile compared to CELP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check CELP's competition here
NOA vs FTSI Comparison July 2026
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 349.9M. In comparison, FTSI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $12.91, while FTSI trades at $26.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 23.76, whereas FTSI's P/E ratio is 4.67. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FTSI's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is less volatile compared to FTSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check FTSI's competition here
NOA vs USWSW Comparison July 2026
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 349.9M. In comparison, USWSW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $12.91, while USWSW trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 23.76, whereas USWSW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to USWSW's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is less volatile compared to USWSW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check USWSW's competition here
NOA vs TDW-WTA Comparison July 2026
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 349.9M. In comparison, TDW-WTA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $12.91, while TDW-WTA trades at $2.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 23.76, whereas TDW-WTA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TDW-WTA's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is less volatile compared to TDW-WTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check TDW-WTA's competition here
NOA vs ACDCW Comparison July 2026
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 349.9M. In comparison, ACDCW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $12.91, while ACDCW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 23.76, whereas ACDCW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ACDCW's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is less volatile compared to ACDCW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check ACDCW's competition here