North American Construction Group Ltd. (NOA) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (NOA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Oil & Gas Equipment & Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NOA | $13.98 | -1.27% | 391M | 16.93 | $0.81 | +2.52% |
| SLB | $56.87 | -1.97% | 82B | 24.17 | $2.27 | +2.12% |
| BKR | $64.74 | -2.06% | 62.1B | 20.00 | $3.13 | +1.46% |
| TS | $62.90 | -1.60% | 33B | 16.17 | $3.80 | +2.90% |
| HAL | $40.24 | -2.38% | 32.7B | 21.64 | $1.81 | +1.73% |
| FTI | $69.08 | +0.10% | 26.6B | 25.59 | $2.61 | +0.30% |
| NOV | $21.02 | -2.00% | 7.2B | 80.60 | $0.25 | +1.64% |
| WFRD | $101.67 | -1.99% | 7B | 15.21 | $6.39 | +1.09% |
| KGS | $67.31 | -1.17% | 6.6B | 85.58 | $0.76 | +2.93% |
| VAL | $91.94 | -1.04% | 6.1B | 6.26 | $14.15 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
NOA vs SLB Comparison June 2026
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 391M. In comparison, SLB has a market cap of 82B. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $13.98, while SLB trades at $56.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.93, whereas SLB's P/E ratio is 24.17. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SLB's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is less volatile compared to SLB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check SLB's competition here
NOA vs BKR Comparison June 2026
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 391M. In comparison, BKR has a market cap of 62.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $13.98, while BKR trades at $64.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.93, whereas BKR's P/E ratio is 20.00. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BKR's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is less volatile compared to BKR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check BKR's competition here
NOA vs TS Comparison June 2026
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 391M. In comparison, TS has a market cap of 33B. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $13.98, while TS trades at $62.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.93, whereas TS's P/E ratio is 16.17. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is more volatile compared to TS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check TS's competition here
NOA vs HAL Comparison June 2026
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 391M. In comparison, HAL has a market cap of 32.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $13.98, while HAL trades at $40.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.93, whereas HAL's P/E ratio is 21.64. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HAL's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is less volatile compared to HAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check HAL's competition here
NOA vs FTI Comparison June 2026
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 391M. In comparison, FTI has a market cap of 26.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $13.98, while FTI trades at $69.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.93, whereas FTI's P/E ratio is 25.59. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FTI's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is less volatile compared to FTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check FTI's competition here
NOA vs NOV Comparison June 2026
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 391M. In comparison, NOV has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $13.98, while NOV trades at $21.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.93, whereas NOV's P/E ratio is 80.60. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NOV's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is less volatile compared to NOV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check NOV's competition here
NOA vs WFRD Comparison June 2026
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 391M. In comparison, WFRD has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $13.98, while WFRD trades at $101.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.93, whereas WFRD's P/E ratio is 15.21. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to WFRD's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is less volatile compared to WFRD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check WFRD's competition here
NOA vs KGS Comparison June 2026
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 391M. In comparison, KGS has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $13.98, while KGS trades at $67.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.93, whereas KGS's P/E ratio is 85.58. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KGS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is less volatile compared to KGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check KGS's competition here
NOA vs VAL Comparison June 2026
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 391M. In comparison, VAL has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $13.98, while VAL trades at $91.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.93, whereas VAL's P/E ratio is 6.26. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VAL's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is less volatile compared to VAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check VAL's competition here
NOA vs AROC Comparison June 2026
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 391M. In comparison, AROC has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $13.98, while AROC trades at $34.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.93, whereas AROC's P/E ratio is 18.58. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AROC's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is less volatile compared to AROC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check AROC's competition here
NOA vs LB Comparison June 2026
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 391M. In comparison, LB has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $13.98, while LB trades at $72.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.93, whereas LB's P/E ratio is 73.15. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LB's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is less volatile compared to LB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check LB's competition here
NOA vs SEI Comparison June 2026
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 391M. In comparison, SEI has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $13.98, while SEI trades at $74.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.93, whereas SEI's P/E ratio is 82.60. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SEI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is less volatile compared to SEI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check SEI's competition here
NOA vs CHX Comparison June 2026
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 391M. In comparison, CHX has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $13.98, while CHX trades at $25.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.93, whereas CHX's P/E ratio is 17.09. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CHX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is more volatile compared to CHX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check CHX's competition here
NOA vs LBRT Comparison June 2026
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 391M. In comparison, LBRT has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $13.98, while LBRT trades at $29.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.93, whereas LBRT's P/E ratio is 31.25. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LBRT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is less volatile compared to LBRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check LBRT's competition here
NOA vs WHD Comparison June 2026
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 391M. In comparison, WHD has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $13.98, while WHD trades at $58.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.93, whereas WHD's P/E ratio is 52.93. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to WHD's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is less volatile compared to WHD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check WHD's competition here
NOA vs OII Comparison June 2026
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 391M. In comparison, OII has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $13.98, while OII trades at $39.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.93, whereas OII's P/E ratio is 11.06. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to OII's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is less volatile compared to OII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check OII's competition here
NOA vs TDW Comparison June 2026
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 391M. In comparison, TDW has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $13.98, while TDW trades at $74.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.93, whereas TDW's P/E ratio is 12.21. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TDW's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is less volatile compared to TDW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check TDW's competition here
NOA vs USAC Comparison June 2026
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 391M. In comparison, USAC has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $13.98, while USAC trades at $27.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.93, whereas USAC's P/E ratio is 28.42. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to USAC's ROE of +6.51%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is less volatile compared to USAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check USAC's competition here
NOA vs CAM Comparison June 2026
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 391M. In comparison, CAM has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $13.98, while CAM trades at $66.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.93, whereas CAM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CAM's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is more volatile compared to CAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check CAM's competition here
NOA vs EFXT Comparison June 2026
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 391M. In comparison, EFXT has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $13.98, while EFXT trades at $24.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.93, whereas EFXT's P/E ratio is 35.53. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EFXT's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is less volatile compared to EFXT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check EFXT's competition here
NOA vs TDW-WT Comparison June 2026
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 391M. In comparison, TDW-WT has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $13.98, while TDW-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.93, whereas TDW-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TDW-WT's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is more volatile compared to TDW-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check TDW-WT's competition here
NOA vs NEX Comparison June 2026
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 391M. In comparison, NEX has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $13.98, while NEX trades at $10.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.93, whereas NEX's P/E ratio is 3.94. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NEX's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is less volatile compared to NEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check NEX's competition here
NOA vs NESR Comparison June 2026
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 391M. In comparison, NESR has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $13.98, while NESR trades at $25.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.93, whereas NESR's P/E ratio is 37.34. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NESR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is less volatile compared to NESR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check NESR's competition here
NOA vs EROK Comparison June 2026
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 391M. In comparison, EROK has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $13.98, while EROK trades at $21.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.93, whereas EROK's P/E ratio is 2147.50. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EROK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is less volatile compared to EROK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check EROK's competition here
NOA vs FLOC Comparison June 2026
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 391M. In comparison, FLOC has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $13.98, while FLOC trades at $23.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.93, whereas FLOC's P/E ratio is 18.85. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FLOC's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is less volatile compared to FLOC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check FLOC's competition here
NOA vs AESI Comparison June 2026
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 391M. In comparison, AESI has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $13.98, while AESI trades at $17.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.93, whereas AESI's P/E ratio is -20.87. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AESI's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is less volatile compared to AESI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check AESI's competition here
NOA vs INVX Comparison June 2026
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 391M. In comparison, INVX has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $13.98, while INVX trades at $29.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.93, whereas INVX's P/E ratio is 35.68. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to INVX's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is less volatile compared to INVX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check INVX's competition here
NOA vs PUMP Comparison June 2026
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 391M. In comparison, PUMP has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $13.98, while PUMP trades at $15.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.93, whereas PUMP's P/E ratio is -133.95. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PUMP's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is less volatile compared to PUMP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check PUMP's competition here
NOA vs XPRO Comparison June 2026
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 391M. In comparison, XPRO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $13.98, while XPRO trades at $16.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.93, whereas XPRO's P/E ratio is 48.06. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to XPRO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is less volatile compared to XPRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check XPRO's competition here
NOA vs DNOW Comparison June 2026
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 391M. In comparison, DNOW has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $13.98, while DNOW trades at $13.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.93, whereas DNOW's P/E ratio is -11.12. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DNOW's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is less volatile compared to DNOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check DNOW's competition here
NOA vs RES Comparison June 2026
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 391M. In comparison, RES has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $13.98, while RES trades at $7.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.93, whereas RES's P/E ratio is 75.61. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RES's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is less volatile compared to RES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check RES's competition here
NOA vs HLX Comparison June 2026
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 391M. In comparison, HLX has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $13.98, while HLX trades at $9.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.93, whereas HLX's P/E ratio is 92.45. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HLX's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is less volatile compared to HLX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check HLX's competition here
NOA vs TTI Comparison June 2026
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 391M. In comparison, TTI has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $13.98, while TTI trades at $9.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.93, whereas TTI's P/E ratio is 154.75. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TTI's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is less volatile compared to TTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check TTI's competition here
NOA vs ACDC Comparison June 2026
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 391M. In comparison, ACDC has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $13.98, while ACDC trades at $7.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.93, whereas ACDC's P/E ratio is -2.70. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ACDC's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is less volatile compared to ACDC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check ACDC's competition here
NOA vs VTOL Comparison June 2026
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 391M. In comparison, VTOL has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $13.98, while VTOL trades at $42.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.93, whereas VTOL's P/E ratio is 10.85. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VTOL's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is less volatile compared to VTOL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check VTOL's competition here
NOA vs SLCA Comparison June 2026
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 391M. In comparison, SLCA has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $13.98, while SLCA trades at $15.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.93, whereas SLCA's P/E ratio is 10.54. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SLCA's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is more volatile compared to SLCA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check SLCA's competition here
NOA vs PFHC Comparison June 2026
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 391M. In comparison, PFHC has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $13.98, while PFHC trades at $22.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.93, whereas PFHC's P/E ratio is 105.14. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PFHC's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is less volatile compared to PFHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check PFHC's competition here
NOA vs NPKI Comparison June 2026
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 391M. In comparison, NPKI has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $13.98, while NPKI trades at $14.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.93, whereas NPKI's P/E ratio is 34.00. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NPKI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is less volatile compared to NPKI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check NPKI's competition here
NOA vs MRC Comparison June 2026
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 391M. In comparison, MRC has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $13.98, while MRC trades at $13.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.93, whereas MRC's P/E ratio is 59.91. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MRC's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is less volatile compared to MRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check MRC's competition here
NOA vs VAL-WT Comparison June 2026
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 391M. In comparison, VAL-WT has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $13.98, while VAL-WT trades at $16.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.93, whereas VAL-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VAL-WT's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is less volatile compared to VAL-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check VAL-WT's competition here
NOA vs HMH Comparison June 2026
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 391M. In comparison, HMH has a market cap of 948.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $13.98, while HMH trades at $22.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.93, whereas HMH's P/E ratio is 163.23. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HMH's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is less volatile compared to HMH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check HMH's competition here
NOA vs NESRW Comparison June 2026
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 391M. In comparison, NESRW has a market cap of 709.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $13.98, while NESRW trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.93, whereas NESRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NESRW's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is less volatile compared to NESRW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check NESRW's competition here
NOA vs FTK Comparison June 2026
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 391M. In comparison, FTK has a market cap of 708.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $13.98, while FTK trades at $24.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.93, whereas FTK's P/E ratio is 29.77. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FTK's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is less volatile compared to FTK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check FTK's competition here
NOA vs NR Comparison June 2026
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 391M. In comparison, NR has a market cap of 627.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $13.98, while NR trades at $7.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.93, whereas NR's P/E ratio is 19.08. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is less volatile compared to NR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check NR's competition here
NOA vs CLB Comparison June 2026
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 391M. In comparison, CLB has a market cap of 593.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $13.98, while CLB trades at $13.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.93, whereas CLB's P/E ratio is 21.11. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CLB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is less volatile compared to CLB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check CLB's competition here
NOA vs FET Comparison June 2026
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 391M. In comparison, FET has a market cap of 569.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $13.98, while FET trades at $52.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.93, whereas FET's P/E ratio is -98.77. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FET's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is less volatile compared to FET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check FET's competition here
NOA vs DRQ Comparison June 2026
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 391M. In comparison, DRQ has a market cap of 530.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $13.98, while DRQ trades at $15.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.93, whereas DRQ's P/E ratio is -19.76. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DRQ's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is less volatile compared to DRQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check DRQ's competition here
NOA vs NGS Comparison June 2026
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 391M. In comparison, NGS has a market cap of 504.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $13.98, while NGS trades at $41.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.93, whereas NGS's P/E ratio is 23.28. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NGS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is less volatile compared to NGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check NGS's competition here
NOA vs SOI Comparison June 2026
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 391M. In comparison, SOI has a market cap of 498.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $13.98, while SOI trades at $11.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.93, whereas SOI's P/E ratio is 17.15. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SOI's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is less volatile compared to SOI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check SOI's competition here
NOA vs OIS Comparison June 2026
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 391M. In comparison, OIS has a market cap of 488.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $13.98, while OIS trades at $8.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.93, whereas OIS's P/E ratio is -4.29. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to OIS's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is less volatile compared to OIS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check OIS's competition here
NOA vs NINE Comparison June 2026
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 391M. In comparison, NINE has a market cap of 439.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $13.98, while NINE trades at $10.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.93, whereas NINE's P/E ratio is -7.57. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NINE's ROE of -1.57%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is less volatile compared to NINE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check NINE's competition here
NOA vs RNGR Comparison June 2026
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 391M. In comparison, RNGR has a market cap of 366.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $13.98, while RNGR trades at $16.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.93, whereas RNGR's P/E ratio is 24.51. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RNGR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is less volatile compared to RNGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check RNGR's competition here
NOA vs CCLP Comparison June 2026
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 391M. In comparison, CCLP has a market cap of 344.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $13.98, while CCLP trades at $2.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.93, whereas CCLP's P/E ratio is -34.57. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CCLP's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is less volatile compared to CCLP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check CCLP's competition here
NOA vs SND Comparison June 2026
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 391M. In comparison, SND has a market cap of 234.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $13.98, while SND trades at $5.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.93, whereas SND's P/E ratio is 9.91. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SND's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is less volatile compared to SND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check SND's competition here
NOA vs OMSE Comparison June 2026
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 391M. In comparison, OMSE has a market cap of 191.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $13.98, while OMSE trades at $4.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.93, whereas OMSE's P/E ratio is 6.54. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to OMSE's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is less volatile compared to OMSE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check OMSE's competition here
NOA vs BOOM Comparison June 2026
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 391M. In comparison, BOOM has a market cap of 138M. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $13.98, while BOOM trades at $6.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.93, whereas BOOM's P/E ratio is -5.27. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BOOM's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is less volatile compared to BOOM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check BOOM's competition here
NOA vs NCSM Comparison June 2026
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 391M. In comparison, NCSM has a market cap of 136.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $13.98, while NCSM trades at $54.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.93, whereas NCSM's P/E ratio is 7.43. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NCSM's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is less volatile compared to NCSM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check NCSM's competition here
NOA vs DWSN Comparison June 2026
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 391M. In comparison, DWSN has a market cap of 123.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $13.98, while DWSN trades at $4.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.93, whereas DWSN's P/E ratio is 24.88. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DWSN's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is less volatile compared to DWSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check DWSN's competition here
NOA vs PFIE Comparison June 2026
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 391M. In comparison, PFIE has a market cap of 117.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $13.98, while PFIE trades at $2.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.93, whereas PFIE's P/E ratio is 13.37. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PFIE's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is more volatile compared to PFIE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check PFIE's competition here
NOA vs GEOS Comparison June 2026
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 391M. In comparison, GEOS has a market cap of 99.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $13.98, while GEOS trades at $7.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.93, whereas GEOS's P/E ratio is -3.39. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GEOS's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is less volatile compared to GEOS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check GEOS's competition here
NOA vs DTI Comparison June 2026
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 391M. In comparison, DTI has a market cap of 95.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $13.98, while DTI trades at $2.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.93, whereas DTI's P/E ratio is -27.20. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DTI's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is less volatile compared to DTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check DTI's competition here
NOA vs LSE Comparison June 2026
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 391M. In comparison, LSE has a market cap of 67.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $13.98, while LSE trades at $3.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.93, whereas LSE's P/E ratio is 49.38. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LSE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is less volatile compared to LSE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check LSE's competition here
NOA vs KLXE Comparison June 2026
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 391M. In comparison, KLXE has a market cap of 55.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $13.98, while KLXE trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.93, whereas KLXE's P/E ratio is -0.75. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KLXE's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is less volatile compared to KLXE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check KLXE's competition here
NOA vs STAK Comparison June 2026
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 391M. In comparison, STAK has a market cap of 49.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $13.98, while STAK trades at $4.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.93, whereas STAK's P/E ratio is -8.65. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to STAK's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is less volatile compared to STAK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check STAK's competition here
NOA vs SDPI Comparison June 2026
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 391M. In comparison, SDPI has a market cap of 30.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $13.98, while SDPI trades at $1.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.93, whereas SDPI's P/E ratio is 7.21. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SDPI's ROE of +0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is more volatile compared to SDPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check SDPI's competition here
NOA vs RCON Comparison June 2026
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 391M. In comparison, RCON has a market cap of 17.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $13.98, while RCON trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.93, whereas RCON's P/E ratio is -1.27. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RCON's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is less volatile compared to RCON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check RCON's competition here
NOA vs ENSV Comparison June 2026
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 391M. In comparison, ENSV has a market cap of 29.1K. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $13.98, while ENSV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.93, whereas ENSV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ENSV's ROE of -28.53%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is less volatile compared to ENSV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check ENSV's competition here
NOA vs TDW-WTA Comparison June 2026
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 391M. In comparison, TDW-WTA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $13.98, while TDW-WTA trades at $2.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.93, whereas TDW-WTA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TDW-WTA's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is less volatile compared to TDW-WTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check TDW-WTA's competition here
NOA vs TDW-WTB Comparison June 2026
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 391M. In comparison, TDW-WTB has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $13.98, while TDW-WTB trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.93, whereas TDW-WTB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TDW-WTB's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is less volatile compared to TDW-WTB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check TDW-WTB's competition here
NOA vs USWS Comparison June 2026
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 391M. In comparison, USWS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $13.98, while USWS trades at $7.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.93, whereas USWS's P/E ratio is -3.94. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to USWS's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is less volatile compared to USWS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check USWS's competition here
NOA vs ACDCW Comparison June 2026
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 391M. In comparison, ACDCW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $13.98, while ACDCW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.93, whereas ACDCW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ACDCW's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is less volatile compared to ACDCW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check ACDCW's competition here
NOA vs CETC Comparison June 2026
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 391M. In comparison, CETC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $13.98, while CETC trades at $4.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.93, whereas CETC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CETC's ROE of -1.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is less volatile compared to CETC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check CETC's competition here
NOA vs USWSW Comparison June 2026
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 391M. In comparison, USWSW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $13.98, while USWSW trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.93, whereas USWSW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to USWSW's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is less volatile compared to USWSW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check USWSW's competition here
NOA vs EXTN Comparison June 2026
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 391M. In comparison, EXTN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $13.98, while EXTN trades at $4.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.93, whereas EXTN's P/E ratio is -1.35. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EXTN's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is less volatile compared to EXTN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check EXTN's competition here
NOA vs IO Comparison June 2026
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 391M. In comparison, IO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $13.98, while IO trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.93, whereas IO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to IO's ROE of +0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is less volatile compared to IO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check IO's competition here
NOA vs GLF Comparison June 2026
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 391M. In comparison, GLF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $13.98, while GLF trades at $28.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.93, whereas GLF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GLF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is less volatile compared to GLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check GLF's competition here
NOA vs FTSI Comparison June 2026
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 391M. In comparison, FTSI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $13.98, while FTSI trades at $26.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.93, whereas FTSI's P/E ratio is 4.67. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FTSI's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is less volatile compared to FTSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check FTSI's competition here
NOA vs CELP Comparison June 2026
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 391M. In comparison, CELP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $13.98, while CELP trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.93, whereas CELP's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CELP's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is less volatile compared to CELP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check CELP's competition here
NOA vs VLI Comparison June 2026
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 391M. In comparison, VLI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $13.98, while VLI trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.93, whereas VLI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VLI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is less volatile compared to VLI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check VLI's competition here
NOA vs APLP Comparison June 2026
NOA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NOA stands at 391M. In comparison, APLP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NOA is priced at $13.98, while APLP trades at $15.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NOA currently has a P/E ratio of 16.93, whereas APLP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NOA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to APLP's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, NOA is more volatile compared to APLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NOA.Check APLP's competition here