Interactive Strength Inc.
Interactive Strength Inc. (TRNR) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (TRNR) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Personal Products & Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TRNR | $4.33 | +2.31% | 5.9M | -0.11 | -$37.90 | N/A |
| ROL | $58.56 | +1.42% | 28.3B | 57.87 | $1.01 | +1.11% |
| SCI | $78.89 | +1.36% | 11B | 21.32 | $3.68 | +1.58% |
| HRB | $54.77 | +0.53% | 7.4B | 13.65 | $4.03 | +2.73% |
| BFAM | $118.79 | -5.04% | 7.1B | 40.66 | $3.05 | N/A |
| FTDR | $55.40 | -4.66% | 4.3B | 19.06 | $3.07 | N/A |
| WW | $41.38 | -3.75% | 3.6B | -52.20 | -$0.86 | N/A |
| DSEY | $8.40 | +0.06% | 2.7B | -14.47 | -$0.58 | N/A |
| ROVR | $11.00 | +0.05% | 2B | 183.25 | $0.06 | N/A |
| MCW | $5.67 | -0.70% | 1.8B | 21.73 | $0.26 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
TRNR vs ROL Comparison August 2025
TRNR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNR stands at 5.9M. In comparison, ROL has a market cap of 28.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TRNR is priced at $4.33, while ROL trades at $58.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas ROL's P/E ratio is 57.87. In terms of profitability, TRNR's ROE is -4.45%, compared to ROL's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNR is more volatile compared to ROL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNR.Check ROL's competition here
TRNR vs SCI Comparison August 2025
TRNR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNR stands at 5.9M. In comparison, SCI has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, TRNR is priced at $4.33, while SCI trades at $78.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas SCI's P/E ratio is 21.32. In terms of profitability, TRNR's ROE is -4.45%, compared to SCI's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNR is more volatile compared to SCI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNR.Check SCI's competition here
TRNR vs HRB Comparison August 2025
TRNR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNR stands at 5.9M. In comparison, HRB has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TRNR is priced at $4.33, while HRB trades at $54.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas HRB's P/E ratio is 13.65. In terms of profitability, TRNR's ROE is -4.45%, compared to HRB's ROE of -1.68%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNR is more volatile compared to HRB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNR.Check HRB's competition here
TRNR vs BFAM Comparison August 2025
TRNR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNR stands at 5.9M. In comparison, BFAM has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TRNR is priced at $4.33, while BFAM trades at $118.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas BFAM's P/E ratio is 40.66. In terms of profitability, TRNR's ROE is -4.45%, compared to BFAM's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNR is more volatile compared to BFAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNR.Check BFAM's competition here
TRNR vs FTDR Comparison August 2025
TRNR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNR stands at 5.9M. In comparison, FTDR has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TRNR is priced at $4.33, while FTDR trades at $55.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas FTDR's P/E ratio is 19.06. In terms of profitability, TRNR's ROE is -4.45%, compared to FTDR's ROE of +1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNR is less volatile compared to FTDR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNR.Check FTDR's competition here
TRNR vs WW Comparison August 2025
TRNR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNR stands at 5.9M. In comparison, WW has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TRNR is priced at $4.33, while WW trades at $41.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas WW's P/E ratio is -52.20. In terms of profitability, TRNR's ROE is -4.45%, compared to WW's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNR is less volatile compared to WW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNR.Check WW's competition here
TRNR vs DSEY Comparison August 2025
TRNR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNR stands at 5.9M. In comparison, DSEY has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TRNR is priced at $4.33, while DSEY trades at $8.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas DSEY's P/E ratio is -14.47. In terms of profitability, TRNR's ROE is -4.45%, compared to DSEY's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNR is more volatile compared to DSEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNR.Check DSEY's competition here
TRNR vs ROVR Comparison August 2025
TRNR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNR stands at 5.9M. In comparison, ROVR has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, TRNR is priced at $4.33, while ROVR trades at $11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas ROVR's P/E ratio is 183.25. In terms of profitability, TRNR's ROE is -4.45%, compared to ROVR's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNR is more volatile compared to ROVR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNR.Check ROVR's competition here
TRNR vs MCW Comparison August 2025
TRNR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNR stands at 5.9M. In comparison, MCW has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TRNR is priced at $4.33, while MCW trades at $5.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas MCW's P/E ratio is 21.73. In terms of profitability, TRNR's ROE is -4.45%, compared to MCW's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNR is more volatile compared to MCW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNR.Check MCW's competition here
TRNR vs CSV Comparison August 2025
TRNR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNR stands at 5.9M. In comparison, CSV has a market cap of 713.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TRNR is priced at $4.33, while CSV trades at $45.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas CSV's P/E ratio is 15.21. In terms of profitability, TRNR's ROE is -4.45%, compared to CSV's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNR is more volatile compared to CSV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNR.Check CSV's competition here
TRNR vs EM Comparison August 2025
TRNR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNR stands at 5.9M. In comparison, EM has a market cap of 149.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TRNR is priced at $4.33, while EM trades at $1.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas EM's P/E ratio is -118.00. In terms of profitability, TRNR's ROE is -4.45%, compared to EM's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNR is more volatile compared to EM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNR.Check EM's competition here
TRNR vs MED Comparison August 2025
TRNR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNR stands at 5.9M. In comparison, MED has a market cap of 148.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TRNR is priced at $4.33, while MED trades at $13.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas MED's P/E ratio is -21.08. In terms of profitability, TRNR's ROE is -4.45%, compared to MED's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNR is less volatile compared to MED. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNR.Check MED's competition here
TRNR vs YYGH Comparison August 2025
TRNR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNR stands at 5.9M. In comparison, YYGH has a market cap of 94.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TRNR is priced at $4.33, while YYGH trades at $2.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas YYGH's P/E ratio is -17.57. In terms of profitability, TRNR's ROE is -4.45%, compared to YYGH's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNR is less volatile compared to YYGH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNR.Check YYGH's competition here
TRNR vs XSPA Comparison August 2025
TRNR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNR stands at 5.9M. In comparison, XSPA has a market cap of 54.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TRNR is priced at $4.33, while XSPA trades at $0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas XSPA's P/E ratio is 21.83. In terms of profitability, TRNR's ROE is -4.45%, compared to XSPA's ROE of -3.60%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNR is more volatile compared to XSPA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNR.Check XSPA's competition here
TRNR vs RGS Comparison August 2025
TRNR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNR stands at 5.9M. In comparison, RGS has a market cap of 47.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TRNR is priced at $4.33, while RGS trades at $19.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas RGS's P/E ratio is 0.52. In terms of profitability, TRNR's ROE is -4.45%, compared to RGS's ROE of +1.58%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNR is more volatile compared to RGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNR.Check RGS's competition here
TRNR vs MRM Comparison August 2025
TRNR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNR stands at 5.9M. In comparison, MRM has a market cap of 6.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TRNR is priced at $4.33, while MRM trades at $1.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas MRM's P/E ratio is 6.79. In terms of profitability, TRNR's ROE is -4.45%, compared to MRM's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNR is more volatile compared to MRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNR.Check MRM's competition here
TRNR vs XWEL Comparison August 2025
TRNR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNR stands at 5.9M. In comparison, XWEL has a market cap of 5.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TRNR is priced at $4.33, while XWEL trades at $1.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas XWEL's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, TRNR's ROE is -4.45%, compared to XWEL's ROE of -8.39%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNR is more volatile compared to XWEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNR.Check XWEL's competition here
TRNR vs EJH Comparison August 2025
TRNR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNR stands at 5.9M. In comparison, EJH has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TRNR is priced at $4.33, while EJH trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas EJH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRNR's ROE is -4.45%, compared to EJH's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNR is more volatile compared to EJH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNR.Check EJH's competition here
TRNR vs IVP Comparison August 2025
TRNR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNR stands at 5.9M. In comparison, IVP has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TRNR is priced at $4.33, while IVP trades at $0.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas IVP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRNR's ROE is -4.45%, compared to IVP's ROE of -11.83%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNR is more volatile compared to IVP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNR.Check IVP's competition here
TRNR vs TMX Comparison August 2025
TRNR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNR stands at 5.9M. In comparison, TMX has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TRNR is priced at $4.33, while TMX trades at $37.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas TMX's P/E ratio is 70.13. In terms of profitability, TRNR's ROE is -4.45%, compared to TMX's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNR is more volatile compared to TMX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNR.Check TMX's competition here
TRNR vs NEBCU Comparison August 2025
TRNR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNR stands at 5.9M. In comparison, NEBCU has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TRNR is priced at $4.33, while NEBCU trades at $11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas NEBCU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRNR's ROE is -4.45%, compared to NEBCU's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNR is more volatile compared to NEBCU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNR.Check NEBCU's competition here
TRNR vs STON Comparison August 2025
TRNR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNR stands at 5.9M. In comparison, STON has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TRNR is priced at $4.33, while STON trades at $3.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas STON's P/E ratio is -6.64. In terms of profitability, TRNR's ROE is -4.45%, compared to STON's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNR is more volatile compared to STON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNR.Check STON's competition here