Tandy Leather Factory, Inc.

TLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLF stands at 28.7M. In comparison, AMZN has a market cap of 2.5T. Regarding current trading prices, TLF is priced at $3.44, while AMZN trades at $230.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLF currently has a P/E ratio of 42.13, whereas AMZN's P/E ratio is 35.22. In terms of profitability, TLF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to AMZN's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TLF is more volatile compared to AMZN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLF.Check AMZN's competition here

TLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLF stands at 28.7M. In comparison, BABA has a market cap of 281.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TLF is priced at $3.44, while BABA trades at $122.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLF currently has a P/E ratio of 42.13, whereas BABA's P/E ratio is 13.37. In terms of profitability, TLF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to BABA's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TLF is more volatile compared to BABA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLF.Check BABA's competition here

TLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLF stands at 28.7M. In comparison, PDD has a market cap of 165.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TLF is priced at $3.44, while PDD trades at $114.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLF currently has a P/E ratio of 42.13, whereas PDD's P/E ratio is 12.75. In terms of profitability, TLF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to PDD's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, TLF is more volatile compared to PDD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLF.Check PDD's competition here

TLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLF stands at 28.7M. In comparison, MELI has a market cap of 121.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TLF is priced at $3.44, while MELI trades at $2,319.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLF currently has a P/E ratio of 42.13, whereas MELI's P/E ratio is 58.92. In terms of profitability, TLF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to MELI's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, TLF is more volatile compared to MELI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLF.Check MELI's competition here

TLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLF stands at 28.7M. In comparison, SE has a market cap of 105.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TLF is priced at $3.44, while SE trades at $174.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLF currently has a P/E ratio of 42.13, whereas SE's P/E ratio is 91.40. In terms of profitability, TLF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TLF is more volatile compared to SE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLF.Check SE's competition here

TLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLF stands at 28.7M. In comparison, ORLY has a market cap of 86.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TLF is priced at $3.44, while ORLY trades at $101.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLF currently has a P/E ratio of 42.13, whereas ORLY's P/E ratio is 36.39. In terms of profitability, TLF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ORLY's ROE of -1.80%. Regarding short-term risk, TLF is more volatile compared to ORLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLF.Check ORLY's competition here

TLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLF stands at 28.7M. In comparison, CVNA has a market cap of 75.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TLF is priced at $3.44, while CVNA trades at $342.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLF currently has a P/E ratio of 42.13, whereas CVNA's P/E ratio is 87.26. In terms of profitability, TLF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CVNA's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, TLF is more volatile compared to CVNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLF.Check CVNA's competition here

TLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLF stands at 28.7M. In comparison, AZO has a market cap of 67.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TLF is priced at $3.44, while AZO trades at $3,992.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLF currently has a P/E ratio of 42.13, whereas AZO's P/E ratio is 27.15. In terms of profitability, TLF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to AZO's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, TLF is more volatile compared to AZO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLF.Check AZO's competition here

TLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLF stands at 28.7M. In comparison, CPNG has a market cap of 51.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TLF is priced at $3.44, while CPNG trades at $28.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLF currently has a P/E ratio of 42.13, whereas CPNG's P/E ratio is 140.68. In terms of profitability, TLF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CPNG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TLF is more volatile compared to CPNG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLF.Check CPNG's competition here

TLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLF stands at 28.7M. In comparison, EBAY has a market cap of 46B. Regarding current trading prices, TLF is priced at $3.44, while EBAY trades at $98.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLF currently has a P/E ratio of 42.13, whereas EBAY's P/E ratio is 22.38. In terms of profitability, TLF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to EBAY's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, TLF is more volatile compared to EBAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLF.Check EBAY's competition here

TLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLF stands at 28.7M. In comparison, JD has a market cap of 45.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TLF is priced at $3.44, while JD trades at $31.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLF currently has a P/E ratio of 42.13, whereas JD's P/E ratio is 7.71. In terms of profitability, TLF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to JD's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TLF is more volatile compared to JD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLF.Check JD's competition here

TLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLF stands at 28.7M. In comparison, TSCO has a market cap of 32.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TLF is priced at $3.44, while TSCO trades at $59.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLF currently has a P/E ratio of 42.13, whereas TSCO's P/E ratio is 29.80. In terms of profitability, TLF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to TSCO's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, TLF is more volatile compared to TSCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLF.Check TSCO's competition here

TLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLF stands at 28.7M. In comparison, WSM has a market cap of 25B. Regarding current trading prices, TLF is priced at $3.44, while WSM trades at $205.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLF currently has a P/E ratio of 42.13, whereas WSM's P/E ratio is 23.50. In terms of profitability, TLF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to WSM's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, TLF is more volatile compared to WSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLF.Check WSM's competition here

TLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLF stands at 28.7M. In comparison, ULTA has a market cap of 23.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TLF is priced at $3.44, while ULTA trades at $526.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLF currently has a P/E ratio of 42.13, whereas ULTA's P/E ratio is 20.38. In terms of profitability, TLF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ULTA's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, TLF is more volatile compared to ULTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLF.Check ULTA's competition here

TLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLF stands at 28.7M. In comparison, GPC has a market cap of 19.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TLF is priced at $3.44, while GPC trades at $137.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLF currently has a P/E ratio of 42.13, whereas GPC's P/E ratio is 23.71. In terms of profitability, TLF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to GPC's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TLF is more volatile compared to GPC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLF.Check GPC's competition here

TLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLF stands at 28.7M. In comparison, CASY has a market cap of 18.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TLF is priced at $3.44, while CASY trades at $508.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLF currently has a P/E ratio of 42.13, whereas CASY's P/E ratio is 34.71. In terms of profitability, TLF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CASY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TLF is more volatile compared to CASY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLF.Check CASY's competition here

TLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLF stands at 28.7M. In comparison, DKS has a market cap of 17.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TLF is priced at $3.44, while DKS trades at $222.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLF currently has a P/E ratio of 42.13, whereas DKS's P/E ratio is 16.01. In terms of profitability, TLF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to DKS's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, TLF is more volatile compared to DKS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLF.Check DKS's competition here

TLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLF stands at 28.7M. In comparison, CHWY has a market cap of 16.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TLF is priced at $3.44, while CHWY trades at $38.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLF currently has a P/E ratio of 42.13, whereas CHWY's P/E ratio is 44.49. In terms of profitability, TLF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CHWY's ROE of +1.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TLF is more volatile compared to CHWY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLF.Check CHWY's competition here

TLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLF stands at 28.7M. In comparison, BBY has a market cap of 15.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TLF is priced at $3.44, while BBY trades at $71.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLF currently has a P/E ratio of 42.13, whereas BBY's P/E ratio is 17.47. In terms of profitability, TLF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to BBY's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, TLF is more volatile compared to BBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLF.Check BBY's competition here

TLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLF stands at 28.7M. In comparison, CART has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TLF is priced at $3.44, while CART trades at $43.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLF currently has a P/E ratio of 42.13, whereas CART's P/E ratio is 25.39. In terms of profitability, TLF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CART's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TLF is more volatile compared to CART. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLF.Check CART's competition here

TLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLF stands at 28.7M. In comparison, GME has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TLF is priced at $3.44, while GME trades at $22.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLF currently has a P/E ratio of 42.13, whereas GME's P/E ratio is 43.27. In terms of profitability, TLF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to GME's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TLF is more volatile compared to GME. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLF.Check GME's competition here

TLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLF stands at 28.7M. In comparison, W has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TLF is priced at $3.44, while W trades at $79.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLF currently has a P/E ratio of 42.13, whereas W's P/E ratio is -32.95. In terms of profitability, TLF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to W's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TLF is more volatile compared to W. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLF.Check W's competition here

TLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLF stands at 28.7M. In comparison, VIPS has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TLF is priced at $3.44, while VIPS trades at $17.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLF currently has a P/E ratio of 42.13, whereas VIPS's P/E ratio is 9.12. In terms of profitability, TLF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to VIPS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TLF is less volatile compared to VIPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLF.Check VIPS's competition here

TLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLF stands at 28.7M. In comparison, MUSA has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TLF is priced at $3.44, while MUSA trades at $388.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLF currently has a P/E ratio of 42.13, whereas MUSA's P/E ratio is 16.36. In terms of profitability, TLF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to MUSA's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, TLF is more volatile compared to MUSA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLF.Check MUSA's competition here

TLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLF stands at 28.7M. In comparison, FIVE has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TLF is priced at $3.44, while FIVE trades at $134.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLF currently has a P/E ratio of 42.13, whereas FIVE's P/E ratio is 28.25. In terms of profitability, TLF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to FIVE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TLF is more volatile compared to FIVE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLF.Check FIVE's competition here

TLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLF stands at 28.7M. In comparison, ETSY has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TLF is priced at $3.44, while ETSY trades at $68.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLF currently has a P/E ratio of 42.13, whereas ETSY's P/E ratio is 53.57. In terms of profitability, TLF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ETSY's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TLF is more volatile compared to ETSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLF.Check ETSY's competition here

TLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLF stands at 28.7M. In comparison, BBWI has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TLF is priced at $3.44, while BBWI trades at $28.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLF currently has a P/E ratio of 42.13, whereas BBWI's P/E ratio is 7.70. In terms of profitability, TLF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to BBWI's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, TLF is more volatile compared to BBWI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLF.Check BBWI's competition here

TLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLF stands at 28.7M. In comparison, GLBE has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TLF is priced at $3.44, while GLBE trades at $30.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLF currently has a P/E ratio of 42.13, whereas GLBE's P/E ratio is -192.56. In terms of profitability, TLF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to GLBE's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TLF is more volatile compared to GLBE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLF.Check GLBE's competition here

TLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLF stands at 28.7M. In comparison, RH has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TLF is priced at $3.44, while RH trades at $235.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLF currently has a P/E ratio of 42.13, whereas RH's P/E ratio is 55.53. In terms of profitability, TLF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to RH's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, TLF is more volatile compared to RH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLF.Check RH's competition here

TLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLF stands at 28.7M. In comparison, ASO has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TLF is priced at $3.44, while ASO trades at $54.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLF currently has a P/E ratio of 42.13, whereas ASO's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, TLF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ASO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TLF is more volatile compared to ASO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLF.Check ASO's competition here

TLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLF stands at 28.7M. In comparison, AAP has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TLF is priced at $3.44, while AAP trades at $56.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLF currently has a P/E ratio of 42.13, whereas AAP's P/E ratio is -5.84. In terms of profitability, TLF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to AAP's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TLF is less volatile compared to AAP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLF.Check AAP's competition here

TLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLF stands at 28.7M. In comparison, OZON has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TLF is priced at $3.44, while OZON trades at $11.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLF currently has a P/E ratio of 42.13, whereas OZON's P/E ratio is -2.61. In terms of profitability, TLF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to OZON's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, TLF is less volatile compared to OZON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLF.Check OZON's competition here

TLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLF stands at 28.7M. In comparison, NEGG has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, TLF is priced at $3.44, while NEGG trades at $128.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLF currently has a P/E ratio of 42.13, whereas NEGG's P/E ratio is -44.90. In terms of profitability, TLF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to NEGG's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, TLF is less volatile compared to NEGG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLF.Check NEGG's competition here

TLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLF stands at 28.7M. In comparison, EYE has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TLF is priced at $3.44, while EYE trades at $22.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLF currently has a P/E ratio of 42.13, whereas EYE's P/E ratio is -113.65. In terms of profitability, TLF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to EYE's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TLF is more volatile compared to EYE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLF.Check EYE's competition here

TLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLF stands at 28.7M. In comparison, SVV has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TLF is priced at $3.44, while SVV trades at $11.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLF currently has a P/E ratio of 42.13, whereas SVV's P/E ratio is 56.50. In terms of profitability, TLF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SVV's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TLF is more volatile compared to SVV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLF.Check SVV's competition here

TLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLF stands at 28.7M. In comparison, WINA has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TLF is priced at $3.44, while WINA trades at $428.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLF currently has a P/E ratio of 42.13, whereas WINA's P/E ratio is 38.26. In terms of profitability, TLF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to WINA's ROE of -0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, TLF is more volatile compared to WINA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLF.Check WINA's competition here

TLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLF stands at 28.7M. In comparison, MNSO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TLF is priced at $3.44, while MNSO trades at $19.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLF currently has a P/E ratio of 42.13, whereas MNSO's P/E ratio is 17.92. In terms of profitability, TLF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to MNSO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TLF is more volatile compared to MNSO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLF.Check MNSO's competition here

TLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLF stands at 28.7M. In comparison, RVLV has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TLF is priced at $3.44, while RVLV trades at $21.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLF currently has a P/E ratio of 42.13, whereas RVLV's P/E ratio is 34.16. In terms of profitability, TLF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to RVLV's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TLF is more volatile compared to RVLV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLF.Check RVLV's competition here

TLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLF stands at 28.7M. In comparison, RERE has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TLF is priced at $3.44, while RERE trades at $4.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLF currently has a P/E ratio of 42.13, whereas RERE's P/E ratio is 46.78. In terms of profitability, TLF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to RERE's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TLF is less volatile compared to RERE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLF.Check RERE's competition here

TLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLF stands at 28.7M. In comparison, SBH has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TLF is priced at $3.44, while SBH trades at $13.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLF currently has a P/E ratio of 42.13, whereas SBH's P/E ratio is 7.24. In terms of profitability, TLF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SBH's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, TLF is more volatile compared to SBH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLF.Check SBH's competition here

TLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLF stands at 28.7M. In comparison, TA has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TLF is priced at $3.44, while TA trades at $86.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLF currently has a P/E ratio of 42.13, whereas TA's P/E ratio is 9.03. In terms of profitability, TLF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to TA's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TLF is more volatile compared to TA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLF.Check TA's competition here

TLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLF stands at 28.7M. In comparison, TDUP has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TLF is priced at $3.44, while TDUP trades at $10.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLF currently has a P/E ratio of 42.13, whereas TDUP's P/E ratio is -42.04. In terms of profitability, TLF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to TDUP's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, TLF is more volatile compared to TDUP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLF.Check TDUP's competition here

TLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLF stands at 28.7M. In comparison, EVGO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TLF is priced at $3.44, while EVGO trades at $3.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLF currently has a P/E ratio of 42.13, whereas EVGO's P/E ratio is -9.52. In terms of profitability, TLF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to EVGO's ROE of +1.82%. Regarding short-term risk, TLF is more volatile compared to EVGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLF.Check EVGO's competition here

TLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLF stands at 28.7M. In comparison, EVGOW has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TLF is priced at $3.44, while EVGOW trades at $0.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLF currently has a P/E ratio of 42.13, whereas EVGOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TLF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to EVGOW's ROE of +1.82%. Regarding short-term risk, TLF is less volatile compared to EVGOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLF.Check EVGOW's competition here

TLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLF stands at 28.7M. In comparison, TANNI has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, TLF is priced at $3.44, while TANNI trades at $25.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLF currently has a P/E ratio of 42.13, whereas TANNI's P/E ratio is 35.27. In terms of profitability, TLF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to TANNI's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TLF is more volatile compared to TANNI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLF.Check TANNI's competition here

TLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLF stands at 28.7M. In comparison, HEPS has a market cap of 951.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TLF is priced at $3.44, while HEPS trades at $3.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLF currently has a P/E ratio of 42.13, whereas HEPS's P/E ratio is -19.73. In terms of profitability, TLF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to HEPS's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, TLF is more volatile compared to HEPS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLF.Check HEPS's competition here

TLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLF stands at 28.7M. In comparison, OLPX has a market cap of 940.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TLF is priced at $3.44, while OLPX trades at $1.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLF currently has a P/E ratio of 42.13, whereas OLPX's P/E ratio is 70.50. In terms of profitability, TLF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to OLPX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TLF is more volatile compared to OLPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLF.Check OLPX's competition here

TLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLF stands at 28.7M. In comparison, WOOF has a market cap of 933.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TLF is priced at $3.44, while WOOF trades at $3.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLF currently has a P/E ratio of 42.13, whereas WOOF's P/E ratio is -13.92. In terms of profitability, TLF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to WOOF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TLF is more volatile compared to WOOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLF.Check WOOF's competition here

TLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLF stands at 28.7M. In comparison, YSG has a market cap of 925.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TLF is priced at $3.44, while YSG trades at $9.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLF currently has a P/E ratio of 42.13, whereas YSG's P/E ratio is -11.73. In terms of profitability, TLF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to YSG's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TLF is less volatile compared to YSG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLF.Check YSG's competition here

TLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLF stands at 28.7M. In comparison, LQDT has a market cap of 793.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TLF is priced at $3.44, while LQDT trades at $26.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLF currently has a P/E ratio of 42.13, whereas LQDT's P/E ratio is 30.60. In terms of profitability, TLF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to LQDT's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TLF is more volatile compared to LQDT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLF.Check LQDT's competition here

TLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLF stands at 28.7M. In comparison, OSTK has a market cap of 768M. Regarding current trading prices, TLF is priced at $3.44, while OSTK trades at $16.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLF currently has a P/E ratio of 42.13, whereas OSTK's P/E ratio is -4.64. In terms of profitability, TLF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to OSTK's ROE of -1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, TLF is more volatile compared to OSTK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLF.Check OSTK's competition here

TLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLF stands at 28.7M. In comparison, BBW has a market cap of 734.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TLF is priced at $3.44, while BBW trades at $55.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLF currently has a P/E ratio of 42.13, whereas BBW's P/E ratio is 13.39. In terms of profitability, TLF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to BBW's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, TLF is more volatile compared to BBW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLF.Check BBW's competition here

TLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLF stands at 28.7M. In comparison, ODP has a market cap of 634.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TLF is priced at $3.44, while ODP trades at $20.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLF currently has a P/E ratio of 42.13, whereas ODP's P/E ratio is 15.28. In terms of profitability, TLF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ODP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TLF is more volatile compared to ODP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLF.Check ODP's competition here

TLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLF stands at 28.7M. In comparison, ARKO has a market cap of 546.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TLF is priced at $3.44, while ARKO trades at $4.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLF currently has a P/E ratio of 42.13, whereas ARKO's P/E ratio is 60.62. In terms of profitability, TLF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ARKO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TLF is more volatile compared to ARKO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLF.Check ARKO's competition here

TLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLF stands at 28.7M. In comparison, HZO has a market cap of 545.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TLF is priced at $3.44, while HZO trades at $25.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLF currently has a P/E ratio of 42.13, whereas HZO's P/E ratio is -21.00. In terms of profitability, TLF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to HZO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TLF is more volatile compared to HZO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLF.Check HZO's competition here

TLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLF stands at 28.7M. In comparison, BYON has a market cap of 508.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TLF is priced at $3.44, while BYON trades at $9.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLF currently has a P/E ratio of 42.13, whereas BYON's P/E ratio is -2.17. In terms of profitability, TLF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to BYON's ROE of -1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, TLF is more volatile compared to BYON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLF.Check BYON's competition here

TLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLF stands at 28.7M. In comparison, DADA has a market cap of 506.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TLF is priced at $3.44, while DADA trades at $1.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLF currently has a P/E ratio of 42.13, whereas DADA's P/E ratio is -1.80. In terms of profitability, TLF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to DADA's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, TLF is more volatile compared to DADA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLF.Check DADA's competition here

TLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLF stands at 28.7M. In comparison, ZKH has a market cap of 495M. Regarding current trading prices, TLF is priced at $3.44, while ZKH trades at $2.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLF currently has a P/E ratio of 42.13, whereas ZKH's P/E ratio is -16.03. In terms of profitability, TLF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ZKH's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TLF is more volatile compared to ZKH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLF.Check ZKH's competition here

TLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLF stands at 28.7M. In comparison, BWMX has a market cap of 483.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TLF is priced at $3.44, while BWMX trades at $12.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLF currently has a P/E ratio of 42.13, whereas BWMX's P/E ratio is -76.18. In terms of profitability, TLF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to BWMX's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, TLF is more volatile compared to BWMX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLF.Check BWMX's competition here

TLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLF stands at 28.7M. In comparison, JMIA has a market cap of 474.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TLF is priced at $3.44, while JMIA trades at $7.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLF currently has a P/E ratio of 42.13, whereas JMIA's P/E ratio is -13.83. In terms of profitability, TLF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to JMIA's ROE of -1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TLF is less volatile compared to JMIA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLF.Check JMIA's competition here

TLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLF stands at 28.7M. In comparison, HNST has a market cap of 426.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TLF is priced at $3.44, while HNST trades at $3.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLF currently has a P/E ratio of 42.13, whereas HNST's P/E ratio is 63.83. In terms of profitability, TLF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to HNST's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TLF is more volatile compared to HNST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLF.Check HNST's competition here

TLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLF stands at 28.7M. In comparison, LE has a market cap of 394.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TLF is priced at $3.44, while LE trades at $12.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLF currently has a P/E ratio of 42.13, whereas LE's P/E ratio is 99.54. In terms of profitability, TLF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to LE's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TLF is more volatile compared to LE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLF.Check LE's competition here

TLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLF stands at 28.7M. In comparison, FLWS has a market cap of 347.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TLF is priced at $3.44, while FLWS trades at $5.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLF currently has a P/E ratio of 42.13, whereas FLWS's P/E ratio is -2.07. In terms of profitability, TLF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to FLWS's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, TLF is more volatile compared to FLWS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLF.Check FLWS's competition here

TLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLF stands at 28.7M. In comparison, BNED has a market cap of 286.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TLF is priced at $3.44, while BNED trades at $8.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLF currently has a P/E ratio of 42.13, whereas BNED's P/E ratio is -0.70. In terms of profitability, TLF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to BNED's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, TLF is more volatile compared to BNED. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLF.Check BNED's competition here

TLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLF stands at 28.7M. In comparison, CHPT has a market cap of 279.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TLF is priced at $3.44, while CHPT trades at $11.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLF currently has a P/E ratio of 42.13, whereas CHPT's P/E ratio is -1.01. In terms of profitability, TLF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CHPT's ROE of -1.57%. Regarding short-term risk, TLF is more volatile compared to CHPT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLF.Check CHPT's competition here

TLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLF stands at 28.7M. In comparison, FTCH has a market cap of 254.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TLF is priced at $3.44, while FTCH trades at $0.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLF currently has a P/E ratio of 42.13, whereas FTCH's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, TLF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to FTCH's ROE of +0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, TLF is less volatile compared to FTCH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLF.Check FTCH's competition here

TLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLF stands at 28.7M. In comparison, QRTEA has a market cap of 213.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TLF is priced at $3.44, while QRTEA trades at $0.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLF currently has a P/E ratio of 42.13, whereas QRTEA's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, TLF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to QRTEA's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, TLF is more volatile compared to QRTEA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLF.Check QRTEA's competition here

TLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLF stands at 28.7M. In comparison, LOGC has a market cap of 194.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TLF is priced at $3.44, while LOGC trades at $7.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLF currently has a P/E ratio of 42.13, whereas LOGC's P/E ratio is -9.61. In terms of profitability, TLF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to LOGC's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TLF is more volatile compared to LOGC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLF.Check LOGC's competition here

TLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLF stands at 28.7M. In comparison, BZUN has a market cap of 163.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TLF is priced at $3.44, while BZUN trades at $2.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLF currently has a P/E ratio of 42.13, whereas BZUN's P/E ratio is -6.44. In terms of profitability, TLF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to BZUN's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TLF is more volatile compared to BZUN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLF.Check BZUN's competition here

TLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLF stands at 28.7M. In comparison, BARK-WT has a market cap of 155.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TLF is priced at $3.44, while BARK-WT trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLF currently has a P/E ratio of 42.13, whereas BARK-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TLF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to BARK-WT's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, TLF is less volatile compared to BARK-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLF.Check BARK-WT's competition here

TLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLF stands at 28.7M. In comparison, VLTA has a market cap of 150M. Regarding current trading prices, TLF is priced at $3.44, while VLTA trades at $0.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLF currently has a P/E ratio of 42.13, whereas VLTA's P/E ratio is -1.30. In terms of profitability, TLF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to VLTA's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, TLF is more volatile compared to VLTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLF.Check VLTA's competition here

TLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLF stands at 28.7M. In comparison, BARK has a market cap of 137.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TLF is priced at $3.44, while BARK trades at $0.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLF currently has a P/E ratio of 42.13, whereas BARK's P/E ratio is -4.77. In terms of profitability, TLF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to BARK's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, TLF is more volatile compared to BARK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLF.Check BARK's competition here

TLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLF stands at 28.7M. In comparison, QRTEP has a market cap of 130M. Regarding current trading prices, TLF is priced at $3.44, while QRTEP trades at $39.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLF currently has a P/E ratio of 42.13, whereas QRTEP's P/E ratio is 120.21. In terms of profitability, TLF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to QRTEP's ROE of +3.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TLF is more volatile compared to QRTEP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLF.Check QRTEP's competition here

TLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLF stands at 28.7M. In comparison, GOED has a market cap of 129.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TLF is priced at $3.44, while GOED trades at $1.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLF currently has a P/E ratio of 42.13, whereas GOED's P/E ratio is 1.81. In terms of profitability, TLF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to GOED's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TLF is less volatile compared to GOED. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLF.Check GOED's competition here

TLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLF stands at 28.7M. In comparison, AKA has a market cap of 115.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TLF is priced at $3.44, while AKA trades at $10.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLF currently has a P/E ratio of 42.13, whereas AKA's P/E ratio is -4.24. In terms of profitability, TLF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to AKA's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TLF is more volatile compared to AKA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLF.Check AKA's competition here

TLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLF stands at 28.7M. In comparison, SPWH has a market cap of 103.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TLF is priced at $3.44, while SPWH trades at $2.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLF currently has a P/E ratio of 42.13, whereas SPWH's P/E ratio is -2.84. In terms of profitability, TLF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SPWH's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TLF is more volatile compared to SPWH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLF.Check SPWH's competition here

TLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLF stands at 28.7M. In comparison, APRN has a market cap of 100M. Regarding current trading prices, TLF is priced at $3.44, while APRN trades at $12.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLF currently has a P/E ratio of 42.13, whereas APRN's P/E ratio is -0.70. In terms of profitability, TLF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to APRN's ROE of -1.93%. Regarding short-term risk, TLF is more volatile compared to APRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLF.Check APRN's competition here

TLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLF stands at 28.7M. In comparison, DIBS has a market cap of 93.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TLF is priced at $3.44, while DIBS trades at $2.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLF currently has a P/E ratio of 42.13, whereas DIBS's P/E ratio is -4.67. In terms of profitability, TLF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to DIBS's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TLF is more volatile compared to DIBS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLF.Check DIBS's competition here

TLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLF stands at 28.7M. In comparison, GRWG has a market cap of 86.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TLF is priced at $3.44, while GRWG trades at $1.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLF currently has a P/E ratio of 42.13, whereas GRWG's P/E ratio is -1.77. In terms of profitability, TLF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to GRWG's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, TLF is less volatile compared to GRWG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLF.Check GRWG's competition here

TLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLF stands at 28.7M. In comparison, OCG has a market cap of 65.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TLF is priced at $3.44, while OCG trades at $3.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLF currently has a P/E ratio of 42.13, whereas OCG's P/E ratio is -17.61. In terms of profitability, TLF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to OCG's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TLF is less volatile compared to OCG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLF.Check OCG's competition here

TLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLF stands at 28.7M. In comparison, HOUR has a market cap of 61.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TLF is priced at $3.44, while HOUR trades at $1.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLF currently has a P/E ratio of 42.13, whereas HOUR's P/E ratio is 58.67. In terms of profitability, TLF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to HOUR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TLF is more volatile compared to HOUR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLF.Check HOUR's competition here

TLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLF stands at 28.7M. In comparison, QRTEB has a market cap of 51.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TLF is priced at $3.44, while QRTEB trades at $2.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLF currently has a P/E ratio of 42.13, whereas QRTEB's P/E ratio is -2.82. In terms of profitability, TLF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to QRTEB's ROE of +3.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TLF is less volatile compared to QRTEB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLF.Check QRTEB's competition here

TLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLF stands at 28.7M. In comparison, NHTC has a market cap of 49.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TLF is priced at $3.44, while NHTC trades at $4.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLF currently has a P/E ratio of 42.13, whereas NHTC's P/E ratio is 143.67. In terms of profitability, TLF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to NHTC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TLF is more volatile compared to NHTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLF.Check NHTC's competition here

TLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLF stands at 28.7M. In comparison, CTIB has a market cap of 48.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TLF is priced at $3.44, while CTIB trades at $2.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLF currently has a P/E ratio of 42.13, whereas CTIB's P/E ratio is -26.67. In terms of profitability, TLF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CTIB's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TLF is less volatile compared to CTIB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLF.Check CTIB's competition here

TLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLF stands at 28.7M. In comparison, PRTS has a market cap of 43.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TLF is priced at $3.44, while PRTS trades at $0.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLF currently has a P/E ratio of 42.13, whereas PRTS's P/E ratio is -0.81. In terms of profitability, TLF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to PRTS's ROE of -0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, TLF is less volatile compared to PRTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLF.Check PRTS's competition here

TLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLF stands at 28.7M. In comparison, BBBY has a market cap of 42M. Regarding current trading prices, TLF is priced at $3.44, while BBBY trades at $0.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLF currently has a P/E ratio of 42.13, whereas BBBY's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, TLF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to BBBY's ROE of +2.66%. Regarding short-term risk, TLF is less volatile compared to BBBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLF.Check BBBY's competition here

TLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLF stands at 28.7M. In comparison, QVCGP has a market cap of 41.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TLF is priced at $3.44, while QVCGP trades at $5.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLF currently has a P/E ratio of 42.13, whereas QVCGP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TLF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to QVCGP's ROE of +4.53%. Regarding short-term risk, TLF is more volatile compared to QVCGP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLF.Check QVCGP's competition here

TLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLF stands at 28.7M. In comparison, QVCGB has a market cap of 37.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TLF is priced at $3.44, while QVCGB trades at $31.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLF currently has a P/E ratio of 42.13, whereas QVCGB's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, TLF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to QVCGB's ROE of +3.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TLF is more volatile compared to QVCGB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLF.Check QVCGB's competition here

TLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLF stands at 28.7M. In comparison, KIRK has a market cap of 37.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TLF is priced at $3.44, while KIRK trades at $1.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLF currently has a P/E ratio of 42.13, whereas KIRK's P/E ratio is -1.02. In terms of profitability, TLF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to KIRK's ROE of +1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, TLF is less volatile compared to KIRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLF.Check KIRK's competition here

TLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLF stands at 28.7M. In comparison, SSU has a market cap of 36.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TLF is priced at $3.44, while SSU trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLF currently has a P/E ratio of 42.13, whereas SSU's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, TLF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SSU's ROE of -1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TLF is less volatile compared to SSU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLF.Check SSU's competition here

TLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLF stands at 28.7M. In comparison, LGCB has a market cap of 33.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TLF is priced at $3.44, while LGCB trades at $2.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLF currently has a P/E ratio of 42.13, whereas LGCB's P/E ratio is -5.72. In terms of profitability, TLF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to LGCB's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TLF is less volatile compared to LGCB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLF.Check LGCB's competition here

TLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLF stands at 28.7M. In comparison, QVCGA has a market cap of 32.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TLF is priced at $3.44, while QVCGA trades at $4.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLF currently has a P/E ratio of 42.13, whereas QVCGA's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, TLF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to QVCGA's ROE of +3.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TLF is less volatile compared to QVCGA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLF.Check QVCGA's competition here

TLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLF stands at 28.7M. In comparison, BGFV has a market cap of 32.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TLF is priced at $3.44, while BGFV trades at $1.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLF currently has a P/E ratio of 42.13, whereas BGFV's P/E ratio is -0.34. In terms of profitability, TLF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to BGFV's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, TLF is more volatile compared to BGFV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLF.Check BGFV's competition here

TLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLF stands at 28.7M. In comparison, DTC has a market cap of 31.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TLF is priced at $3.44, while DTC trades at $10.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLF currently has a P/E ratio of 42.13, whereas DTC's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, TLF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to DTC's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, TLF is less volatile compared to DTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLF.Check DTC's competition here

TLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLF stands at 28.7M. In comparison, ZOOZ has a market cap of 21.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TLF is priced at $3.44, while ZOOZ trades at $1.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLF currently has a P/E ratio of 42.13, whereas ZOOZ's P/E ratio is -1.61. In terms of profitability, TLF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ZOOZ's ROE of -1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TLF is less volatile compared to ZOOZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLF.Check ZOOZ's competition here

TLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLF stands at 28.7M. In comparison, JBDI has a market cap of 20.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TLF is priced at $3.44, while JBDI trades at $1.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLF currently has a P/E ratio of 42.13, whereas JBDI's P/E ratio is -6.87. In terms of profitability, TLF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to JBDI's ROE of -1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TLF is more volatile compared to JBDI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLF.Check JBDI's competition here

TLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLF stands at 28.7M. In comparison, IPW has a market cap of 17.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TLF is priced at $3.44, while IPW trades at $0.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLF currently has a P/E ratio of 42.13, whereas IPW's P/E ratio is -11.36. In terms of profitability, TLF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to IPW's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TLF is more volatile compared to IPW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLF.Check IPW's competition here

TLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLF stands at 28.7M. In comparison, CGTL has a market cap of 16.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TLF is priced at $3.44, while CGTL trades at $0.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLF currently has a P/E ratio of 42.13, whereas CGTL's P/E ratio is 3.85. In terms of profitability, TLF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CGTL's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, TLF is less volatile compared to CGTL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLF.Check CGTL's competition here

TLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TLF stands at 28.7M. In comparison, MI has a market cap of 14.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TLF is priced at $3.44, while MI trades at $3.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TLF currently has a P/E ratio of 42.13, whereas MI's P/E ratio is 1.93. In terms of profitability, TLF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to MI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TLF is less volatile compared to MI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLF.Check MI's competition here