Tandy Leather Factory, Inc.
Tandy Leather Factory, Inc. TLF Peers
See (TLF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Specialty Retail Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TLF | $3.15 | -1.25% | 26.8M | 2.10 | $1.50 | +47.62% |
| AMZN | $223.41 | +1.59% | 2.4T | 36.33 | $6.15 | N/A |
| BABA | $108.70 | -1.82% | 259.3B | 11.98 | $9.07 | +1.82% |
| PDD | $103.59 | -0.37% | 143.9B | 11.11 | $9.32 | N/A |
| MELI | $2,514.05 | +1.70% | 127.5B | 61.74 | $40.72 | N/A |
| SE | $149.47 | +0.03% | 88.5B | 104.52 | $1.43 | N/A |
| ORLY | $91.33 | +2.25% | 78.1B | 33.58 | $2.72 | N/A |
| CVNA | $348.33 | +1.44% | 74.6B | 120.95 | $2.88 | N/A |
| AZO | $3,769.26 | +2.28% | 63.1B | 25.53 | $147.64 | N/A |
| CPNG | $30.29 | +0.87% | 55B | 216.36 | $0.14 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
TLF vs AMZN Comparison
TLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TLF stands at 26.8M. In comparison, AMZN has a market cap of 2.4T. Regarding current trading prices, TLF is priced at $3.15, while AMZN trades at $223.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.10, whereas AMZN's P/E ratio is 36.33. In terms of profitability, TLF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to AMZN's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TLF is more volatile compared to AMZN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLF.
TLF vs BABA Comparison
TLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TLF stands at 26.8M. In comparison, BABA has a market cap of 259.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TLF is priced at $3.15, while BABA trades at $108.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.10, whereas BABA's P/E ratio is 11.98. In terms of profitability, TLF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to BABA's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TLF is more volatile compared to BABA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLF.
TLF vs PDD Comparison
TLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TLF stands at 26.8M. In comparison, PDD has a market cap of 143.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TLF is priced at $3.15, while PDD trades at $103.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.10, whereas PDD's P/E ratio is 11.11. In terms of profitability, TLF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to PDD's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, TLF is more volatile compared to PDD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLF.
TLF vs MELI Comparison
TLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TLF stands at 26.8M. In comparison, MELI has a market cap of 127.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TLF is priced at $3.15, while MELI trades at $2,514.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.10, whereas MELI's P/E ratio is 61.74. In terms of profitability, TLF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to MELI's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, TLF is more volatile compared to MELI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLF.
TLF vs SE Comparison
TLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TLF stands at 26.8M. In comparison, SE has a market cap of 88.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TLF is priced at $3.15, while SE trades at $149.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.10, whereas SE's P/E ratio is 104.52. In terms of profitability, TLF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TLF is less volatile compared to SE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLF.
TLF vs ORLY Comparison
TLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TLF stands at 26.8M. In comparison, ORLY has a market cap of 78.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TLF is priced at $3.15, while ORLY trades at $91.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.10, whereas ORLY's P/E ratio is 33.58. In terms of profitability, TLF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ORLY's ROE of -1.65%. Regarding short-term risk, TLF is less volatile compared to ORLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLF.
TLF vs CVNA Comparison
TLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TLF stands at 26.8M. In comparison, CVNA has a market cap of 74.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TLF is priced at $3.15, while CVNA trades at $348.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.10, whereas CVNA's P/E ratio is 120.95. In terms of profitability, TLF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CVNA's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, TLF is less volatile compared to CVNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLF.
TLF vs AZO Comparison
TLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TLF stands at 26.8M. In comparison, AZO has a market cap of 63.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TLF is priced at $3.15, while AZO trades at $3,769.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.10, whereas AZO's P/E ratio is 25.53. In terms of profitability, TLF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to AZO's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, TLF is less volatile compared to AZO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLF.
TLF vs CPNG Comparison
TLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TLF stands at 26.8M. In comparison, CPNG has a market cap of 55B. Regarding current trading prices, TLF is priced at $3.15, while CPNG trades at $30.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.10, whereas CPNG's P/E ratio is 216.36. In terms of profitability, TLF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CPNG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TLF is less volatile compared to CPNG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLF.
TLF vs JD Comparison
TLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TLF stands at 26.8M. In comparison, JD has a market cap of 46.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TLF is priced at $3.15, while JD trades at $32.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.10, whereas JD's P/E ratio is 7.78. In terms of profitability, TLF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to JD's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TLF is more volatile compared to JD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLF.
TLF vs VIPS Comparison
TLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TLF stands at 26.8M. In comparison, VIPS has a market cap of 37.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TLF is priced at $3.15, while VIPS trades at $14.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.10, whereas VIPS's P/E ratio is 7.73. In terms of profitability, TLF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to VIPS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TLF is more volatile compared to VIPS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLF.
TLF vs EBAY Comparison
TLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TLF stands at 26.8M. In comparison, EBAY has a market cap of 35.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TLF is priced at $3.15, while EBAY trades at $76.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.10, whereas EBAY's P/E ratio is 18.36. In terms of profitability, TLF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to EBAY's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, TLF is more volatile compared to EBAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLF.
TLF vs TSCO Comparison
TLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TLF stands at 26.8M. In comparison, TSCO has a market cap of 29B. Regarding current trading prices, TLF is priced at $3.15, while TSCO trades at $54.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.10, whereas TSCO's P/E ratio is 27.18. In terms of profitability, TLF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to TSCO's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, TLF is less volatile compared to TSCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLF.
TLF vs ULTA Comparison
TLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TLF stands at 26.8M. In comparison, ULTA has a market cap of 21.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TLF is priced at $3.15, while ULTA trades at $477.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.10, whereas ULTA's P/E ratio is 18.67. In terms of profitability, TLF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ULTA's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, TLF is less volatile compared to ULTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLF.
TLF vs WSM Comparison
TLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TLF stands at 26.8M. In comparison, WSM has a market cap of 21.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TLF is priced at $3.15, while WSM trades at $173.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.10, whereas WSM's P/E ratio is 20.00. In terms of profitability, TLF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to WSM's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, TLF is more volatile compared to WSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLF.
TLF vs CASY Comparison
TLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TLF stands at 26.8M. In comparison, CASY has a market cap of 19.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TLF is priced at $3.15, while CASY trades at $517.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.10, whereas CASY's P/E ratio is 35.38. In terms of profitability, TLF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CASY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TLF is less volatile compared to CASY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLF.
TLF vs GPC Comparison
TLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TLF stands at 26.8M. In comparison, GPC has a market cap of 17.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TLF is priced at $3.15, while GPC trades at $127.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.10, whereas GPC's P/E ratio is 20.92. In terms of profitability, TLF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to GPC's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TLF is more volatile compared to GPC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLF.
TLF vs CHWY Comparison
TLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TLF stands at 26.8M. In comparison, CHWY has a market cap of 17.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TLF is priced at $3.15, while CHWY trades at $41.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.10, whereas CHWY's P/E ratio is 45.37. In terms of profitability, TLF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CHWY's ROE of +1.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TLF is less volatile compared to CHWY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLF.
TLF vs DKS Comparison
TLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TLF stands at 26.8M. In comparison, DKS has a market cap of 16.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TLF is priced at $3.15, while DKS trades at $206.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.10, whereas DKS's P/E ratio is 14.74. In terms of profitability, TLF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to DKS's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, TLF is less volatile compared to DKS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLF.
TLF vs BBY Comparison
TLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TLF stands at 26.8M. In comparison, BBY has a market cap of 15.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TLF is priced at $3.15, while BBY trades at $72.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.10, whereas BBY's P/E ratio is 17.59. In terms of profitability, TLF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to BBY's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, TLF is less volatile compared to BBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLF.
TLF vs CART Comparison
TLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TLF stands at 26.8M. In comparison, CART has a market cap of 12.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TLF is priced at $3.15, while CART trades at $47.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.10, whereas CART's P/E ratio is 31.04. In terms of profitability, TLF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CART's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TLF is less volatile compared to CART. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLF.
TLF vs GME Comparison
TLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TLF stands at 26.8M. In comparison, GME has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TLF is priced at $3.15, while GME trades at $23.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.10, whereas GME's P/E ratio is 44.51. In terms of profitability, TLF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to GME's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TLF is less volatile compared to GME. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLF.
TLF vs MUSA Comparison
TLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TLF stands at 26.8M. In comparison, MUSA has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TLF is priced at $3.15, while MUSA trades at $423.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.10, whereas MUSA's P/E ratio is 17.92. In terms of profitability, TLF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to MUSA's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, TLF is less volatile compared to MUSA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLF.
TLF vs FIVE Comparison
TLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TLF stands at 26.8M. In comparison, FIVE has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TLF is priced at $3.15, while FIVE trades at $132.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.10, whereas FIVE's P/E ratio is 27.73. In terms of profitability, TLF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to FIVE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TLF is less volatile compared to FIVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLF.
TLF vs W Comparison
TLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TLF stands at 26.8M. In comparison, W has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TLF is priced at $3.15, while W trades at $56.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.10, whereas W's P/E ratio is -20.00. In terms of profitability, TLF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to W's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TLF is less volatile compared to W. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLF.
TLF vs BBWI Comparison
TLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TLF stands at 26.8M. In comparison, BBWI has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, TLF is priced at $3.15, while BBWI trades at $33.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.10, whereas BBWI's P/E ratio is 8.91. In terms of profitability, TLF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to BBWI's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, TLF is less volatile compared to BBWI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLF.
TLF vs ETSY Comparison
TLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TLF stands at 26.8M. In comparison, ETSY has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TLF is priced at $3.15, while ETSY trades at $54.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.10, whereas ETSY's P/E ratio is 39.40. In terms of profitability, TLF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ETSY's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, TLF is less volatile compared to ETSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLF.
TLF vs GLBE Comparison
TLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TLF stands at 26.8M. In comparison, GLBE has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TLF is priced at $3.15, while GLBE trades at $33.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.10, whereas GLBE's P/E ratio is -90.19. In terms of profitability, TLF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to GLBE's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TLF is less volatile compared to GLBE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLF.
TLF vs RH Comparison
TLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TLF stands at 26.8M. In comparison, RH has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TLF is priced at $3.15, while RH trades at $207.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.10, whereas RH's P/E ratio is 49.18. In terms of profitability, TLF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to RH's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, TLF is less volatile compared to RH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLF.
TLF vs ASO Comparison
TLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TLF stands at 26.8M. In comparison, ASO has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TLF is priced at $3.15, while ASO trades at $47.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.10, whereas ASO's P/E ratio is 8.75. In terms of profitability, TLF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ASO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TLF is less volatile compared to ASO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLF.
TLF vs AAP Comparison
TLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TLF stands at 26.8M. In comparison, AAP has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TLF is priced at $3.15, while AAP trades at $51.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.10, whereas AAP's P/E ratio is -5.31. In terms of profitability, TLF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to AAP's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TLF is less volatile compared to AAP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLF.
TLF vs OZON Comparison
TLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TLF stands at 26.8M. In comparison, OZON has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TLF is priced at $3.15, while OZON trades at $11.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.10, whereas OZON's P/E ratio is -2.61. In terms of profitability, TLF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to OZON's ROE of +0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, TLF is less volatile compared to OZON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLF.
TLF vs EYE Comparison
TLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TLF stands at 26.8M. In comparison, EYE has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TLF is priced at $3.15, while EYE trades at $23.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.10, whereas EYE's P/E ratio is -74.69. In terms of profitability, TLF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to EYE's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TLF is less volatile compared to EYE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLF.
TLF vs SVV Comparison
TLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TLF stands at 26.8M. In comparison, SVV has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TLF is priced at $3.15, while SVV trades at $10.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.10, whereas SVV's P/E ratio is 77.71. In terms of profitability, TLF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SVV's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TLF is less volatile compared to SVV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLF.
TLF vs RVLV Comparison
TLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TLF stands at 26.8M. In comparison, RVLV has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TLF is priced at $3.15, while RVLV trades at $21.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.10, whereas RVLV's P/E ratio is 30.39. In terms of profitability, TLF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to RVLV's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TLF is less volatile compared to RVLV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLF.
TLF vs MNSO Comparison
TLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TLF stands at 26.8M. In comparison, MNSO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TLF is priced at $3.15, while MNSO trades at $18.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.10, whereas MNSO's P/E ratio is 16.39. In terms of profitability, TLF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to MNSO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TLF is more volatile compared to MNSO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLF.
TLF vs WINA Comparison
TLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TLF stands at 26.8M. In comparison, WINA has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TLF is priced at $3.15, while WINA trades at $374.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.10, whereas WINA's P/E ratio is 33.49. In terms of profitability, TLF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to WINA's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, TLF is less volatile compared to WINA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLF.
TLF vs TA Comparison
TLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TLF stands at 26.8M. In comparison, TA has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TLF is priced at $3.15, while TA trades at $86.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.10, whereas TA's P/E ratio is 9.03. In terms of profitability, TLF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to TA's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TLF is more volatile compared to TA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLF.
TLF vs EVGO Comparison
TLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TLF stands at 26.8M. In comparison, EVGO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TLF is priced at $3.15, while EVGO trades at $3.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.10, whereas EVGO's P/E ratio is -8.63. In terms of profitability, TLF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to EVGO's ROE of +0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, TLF is less volatile compared to EVGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLF.
TLF vs OLPX Comparison
TLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TLF stands at 26.8M. In comparison, OLPX has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TLF is priced at $3.15, while OLPX trades at $1.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.10, whereas OLPX's P/E ratio is 79.00. In terms of profitability, TLF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to OLPX's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TLF is less volatile compared to OLPX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLF.
TLF vs EVGOW Comparison
TLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TLF stands at 26.8M. In comparison, EVGOW has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, TLF is priced at $3.15, while EVGOW trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.10, whereas EVGOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TLF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to EVGOW's ROE of +0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, TLF is less volatile compared to EVGOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLF.
TLF vs SBH Comparison
TLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TLF stands at 26.8M. In comparison, SBH has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, TLF is priced at $3.15, while SBH trades at $10.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.10, whereas SBH's P/E ratio is 5.84. In terms of profitability, TLF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SBH's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, TLF is less volatile compared to SBH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLF.
TLF vs TANNI Comparison
TLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TLF stands at 26.8M. In comparison, TANNI has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, TLF is priced at $3.15, while TANNI trades at $25.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.10, whereas TANNI's P/E ratio is 35.27. In terms of profitability, TLF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to TANNI's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TLF is more volatile compared to TANNI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLF.
TLF vs TDUP Comparison
TLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TLF stands at 26.8M. In comparison, TDUP has a market cap of 946M. Regarding current trading prices, TLF is priced at $3.15, while TDUP trades at $8.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.10, whereas TDUP's P/E ratio is -27.59. In terms of profitability, TLF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to TDUP's ROE of -0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, TLF is less volatile compared to TDUP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLF.
TLF vs YSG Comparison
TLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TLF stands at 26.8M. In comparison, YSG has a market cap of 934.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TLF is priced at $3.15, while YSG trades at $10.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.10, whereas YSG's P/E ratio is -12.51. In terms of profitability, TLF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to YSG's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TLF is less volatile compared to YSG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLF.
TLF vs HEPS Comparison
TLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TLF stands at 26.8M. In comparison, HEPS has a market cap of 899.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TLF is priced at $3.15, while HEPS trades at $2.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.10, whereas HEPS's P/E ratio is -20.00. In terms of profitability, TLF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to HEPS's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, TLF is less volatile compared to HEPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLF.
TLF vs WOOF Comparison
TLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TLF stands at 26.8M. In comparison, WOOF has a market cap of 859.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TLF is priced at $3.15, while WOOF trades at $3.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.10, whereas WOOF's P/E ratio is -12.83. In terms of profitability, TLF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to WOOF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TLF is less volatile compared to WOOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLF.
TLF vs RERE Comparison
TLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TLF stands at 26.8M. In comparison, RERE has a market cap of 772.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TLF is priced at $3.15, while RERE trades at $3.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.10, whereas RERE's P/E ratio is 38.67. In terms of profitability, TLF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to RERE's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TLF is less volatile compared to RERE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLF.
TLF vs OSTK Comparison
TLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TLF stands at 26.8M. In comparison, OSTK has a market cap of 768M. Regarding current trading prices, TLF is priced at $3.15, while OSTK trades at $16.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.10, whereas OSTK's P/E ratio is -4.64. In terms of profitability, TLF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to OSTK's ROE of -1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TLF is less volatile compared to OSTK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLF.
TLF vs LQDT Comparison
TLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TLF stands at 26.8M. In comparison, LQDT has a market cap of 756.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TLF is priced at $3.15, while LQDT trades at $24.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.10, whereas LQDT's P/E ratio is 30.66. In terms of profitability, TLF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to LQDT's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TLF is more volatile compared to LQDT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLF.
TLF vs BBW Comparison
TLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TLF stands at 26.8M. In comparison, BBW has a market cap of 711.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TLF is priced at $3.15, while BBW trades at $53.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.10, whereas BBW's P/E ratio is 12.98. In terms of profitability, TLF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to BBW's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, TLF is less volatile compared to BBW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLF.
TLF vs HZO Comparison
TLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TLF stands at 26.8M. In comparison, HZO has a market cap of 596.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TLF is priced at $3.15, while HZO trades at $27.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.10, whereas HZO's P/E ratio is 11.34. In terms of profitability, TLF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to HZO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TLF is less volatile compared to HZO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLF.
TLF vs ODP Comparison
TLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TLF stands at 26.8M. In comparison, ODP has a market cap of 591.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TLF is priced at $3.15, while ODP trades at $19.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.10, whereas ODP's P/E ratio is 15.36. In terms of profitability, TLF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ODP's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TLF is less volatile compared to ODP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLF.
TLF vs HNST Comparison
TLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TLF stands at 26.8M. In comparison, HNST has a market cap of 567.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TLF is priced at $3.15, while HNST trades at $5.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.10, whereas HNST's P/E ratio is -257.50. In terms of profitability, TLF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to HNST's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TLF is less volatile compared to HNST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLF.
TLF vs ARKO Comparison
TLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TLF stands at 26.8M. In comparison, ARKO has a market cap of 528.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TLF is priced at $3.15, while ARKO trades at $4.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.10, whereas ARKO's P/E ratio is 154.67. In terms of profitability, TLF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ARKO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TLF is less volatile compared to ARKO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLF.
TLF vs DADA Comparison
TLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TLF stands at 26.8M. In comparison, DADA has a market cap of 506.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TLF is priced at $3.15, while DADA trades at $1.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.10, whereas DADA's P/E ratio is -1.80. In terms of profitability, TLF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to DADA's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, TLF is less volatile compared to DADA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLF.
TLF vs ZKH Comparison
TLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TLF stands at 26.8M. In comparison, ZKH has a market cap of 499.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TLF is priced at $3.15, while ZKH trades at $3.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.10, whereas ZKH's P/E ratio is -16.58. In terms of profitability, TLF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ZKH's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TLF is less volatile compared to ZKH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLF.
TLF vs BYON Comparison
TLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TLF stands at 26.8M. In comparison, BYON has a market cap of 434.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TLF is priced at $3.15, while BYON trades at $7.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.10, whereas BYON's P/E ratio is -1.61. In terms of profitability, TLF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to BYON's ROE of -1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TLF is less volatile compared to BYON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLF.
TLF vs BNED Comparison
TLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TLF stands at 26.8M. In comparison, BNED has a market cap of 386.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TLF is priced at $3.15, while BNED trades at $11.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.10, whereas BNED's P/E ratio is -0.94. In terms of profitability, TLF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to BNED's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, TLF is less volatile compared to BNED. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLF.
TLF vs FLWS Comparison
TLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TLF stands at 26.8M. In comparison, FLWS has a market cap of 356.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TLF is priced at $3.15, while FLWS trades at $5.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.10, whereas FLWS's P/E ratio is -2.12. In terms of profitability, TLF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to FLWS's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, TLF is less volatile compared to FLWS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLF.
TLF vs LE Comparison
TLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TLF stands at 26.8M. In comparison, LE has a market cap of 355M. Regarding current trading prices, TLF is priced at $3.15, while LE trades at $11.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.10, whereas LE's P/E ratio is 89.62. In terms of profitability, TLF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to LE's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TLF is less volatile compared to LE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLF.
TLF vs CHPT Comparison
TLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TLF stands at 26.8M. In comparison, CHPT has a market cap of 330.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TLF is priced at $3.15, while CHPT trades at $0.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.10, whereas CHPT's P/E ratio is -1.21. In terms of profitability, TLF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CHPT's ROE of -1.57%. Regarding short-term risk, TLF is less volatile compared to CHPT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLF.
TLF vs BWMX Comparison
TLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TLF stands at 26.8M. In comparison, BWMX has a market cap of 323.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TLF is priced at $3.15, while BWMX trades at $8.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.10, whereas BWMX's P/E ratio is -43.30. In terms of profitability, TLF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to BWMX's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, TLF is more volatile compared to BWMX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLF.
TLF vs NEGG Comparison
TLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TLF stands at 26.8M. In comparison, NEGG has a market cap of 321.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TLF is priced at $3.15, while NEGG trades at $16.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.10, whereas NEGG's P/E ratio is -7.37. In terms of profitability, TLF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to NEGG's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, TLF is less volatile compared to NEGG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLF.
TLF vs JMIA Comparison
TLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TLF stands at 26.8M. In comparison, JMIA has a market cap of 271.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TLF is priced at $3.15, while JMIA trades at $4.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.10, whereas JMIA's P/E ratio is -7.03. In terms of profitability, TLF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to JMIA's ROE of -1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TLF is less volatile compared to JMIA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLF.
TLF vs FTCH Comparison
TLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TLF stands at 26.8M. In comparison, FTCH has a market cap of 254.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TLF is priced at $3.15, while FTCH trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.10, whereas FTCH's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, TLF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to FTCH's ROE of +0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, TLF is less volatile compared to FTCH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLF.
TLF vs QRTEA Comparison
TLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TLF stands at 26.8M. In comparison, QRTEA has a market cap of 213.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TLF is priced at $3.15, while QRTEA trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.10, whereas QRTEA's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, TLF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to QRTEA's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, TLF is less volatile compared to QRTEA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLF.
TLF vs LOGC Comparison
TLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TLF stands at 26.8M. In comparison, LOGC has a market cap of 194.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TLF is priced at $3.15, while LOGC trades at $7.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.10, whereas LOGC's P/E ratio is -9.61. In terms of profitability, TLF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to LOGC's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TLF is less volatile compared to LOGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLF.
TLF vs BARK Comparison
TLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TLF stands at 26.8M. In comparison, BARK has a market cap of 154.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TLF is priced at $3.15, while BARK trades at $0.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.10, whereas BARK's P/E ratio is -4.80. In terms of profitability, TLF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to BARK's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, TLF is less volatile compared to BARK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLF.
TLF vs BZUN Comparison
TLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TLF stands at 26.8M. In comparison, BZUN has a market cap of 154.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TLF is priced at $3.15, while BZUN trades at $2.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.10, whereas BZUN's P/E ratio is -6.07. In terms of profitability, TLF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to BZUN's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TLF is less volatile compared to BZUN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLF.
TLF vs VLTA Comparison
TLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TLF stands at 26.8M. In comparison, VLTA has a market cap of 150M. Regarding current trading prices, TLF is priced at $3.15, while VLTA trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.10, whereas VLTA's P/E ratio is -1.30. In terms of profitability, TLF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to VLTA's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, TLF is more volatile compared to VLTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLF.
TLF vs SPWH Comparison
TLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TLF stands at 26.8M. In comparison, SPWH has a market cap of 134.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TLF is priced at $3.15, while SPWH trades at $3.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.10, whereas SPWH's P/E ratio is -3.71. In terms of profitability, TLF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SPWH's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TLF is less volatile compared to SPWH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLF.
TLF vs QRTEP Comparison
TLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TLF stands at 26.8M. In comparison, QRTEP has a market cap of 130M. Regarding current trading prices, TLF is priced at $3.15, while QRTEP trades at $39.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.10, whereas QRTEP's P/E ratio is 120.21. In terms of profitability, TLF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to QRTEP's ROE of +4.53%. Regarding short-term risk, TLF is less volatile compared to QRTEP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLF.
TLF vs GOED Comparison
TLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TLF stands at 26.8M. In comparison, GOED has a market cap of 129.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TLF is priced at $3.15, while GOED trades at $1.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.10, whereas GOED's P/E ratio is 1.81. In terms of profitability, TLF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to GOED's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, TLF is less volatile compared to GOED. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLF.
TLF vs OCG Comparison
TLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TLF stands at 26.8M. In comparison, OCG has a market cap of 126.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TLF is priced at $3.15, while OCG trades at $6.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.10, whereas OCG's P/E ratio is -33.80. In terms of profitability, TLF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to OCG's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TLF is less volatile compared to OCG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLF.
TLF vs AKA Comparison
TLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TLF stands at 26.8M. In comparison, AKA has a market cap of 118.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TLF is priced at $3.15, while AKA trades at $11.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.10, whereas AKA's P/E ratio is -4.64. In terms of profitability, TLF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to AKA's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TLF is more volatile compared to AKA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLF.
TLF vs DIBS Comparison
TLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TLF stands at 26.8M. In comparison, DIBS has a market cap of 101.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TLF is priced at $3.15, while DIBS trades at $2.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.10, whereas DIBS's P/E ratio is -5.18. In terms of profitability, TLF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to DIBS's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TLF is less volatile compared to DIBS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLF.
TLF vs APRN Comparison
TLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TLF stands at 26.8M. In comparison, APRN has a market cap of 100M. Regarding current trading prices, TLF is priced at $3.15, while APRN trades at $12.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.10, whereas APRN's P/E ratio is -0.70. In terms of profitability, TLF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to APRN's ROE of -1.93%. Regarding short-term risk, TLF is more volatile compared to APRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLF.
TLF vs QVCGP Comparison
TLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TLF stands at 26.8M. In comparison, QVCGP has a market cap of 61.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TLF is priced at $3.15, while QVCGP trades at $7.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.10, whereas QVCGP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TLF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to QVCGP's ROE of +4.53%. Regarding short-term risk, TLF is less volatile compared to QVCGP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLF.
TLF vs GRWG Comparison
TLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TLF stands at 26.8M. In comparison, GRWG has a market cap of 60.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TLF is priced at $3.15, while GRWG trades at $1.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.10, whereas GRWG's P/E ratio is -1.20. In terms of profitability, TLF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to GRWG's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, TLF is less volatile compared to GRWG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLF.
TLF vs HOUR Comparison
TLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TLF stands at 26.8M. In comparison, HOUR has a market cap of 54.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TLF is priced at $3.15, while HOUR trades at $1.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.10, whereas HOUR's P/E ratio is 156.00. In terms of profitability, TLF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to HOUR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TLF is less volatile compared to HOUR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLF.
TLF vs NHTC Comparison
TLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TLF stands at 26.8M. In comparison, NHTC has a market cap of 53.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TLF is priced at $3.15, while NHTC trades at $4.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.10, whereas NHTC's P/E ratio is 115.50. In terms of profitability, TLF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to NHTC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TLF is less volatile compared to NHTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLF.
TLF vs BARK-WT Comparison
TLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TLF stands at 26.8M. In comparison, BARK-WT has a market cap of 53M. Regarding current trading prices, TLF is priced at $3.15, while BARK-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.10, whereas BARK-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TLF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to BARK-WT's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, TLF is less volatile compared to BARK-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLF.
TLF vs QRTEB Comparison
TLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TLF stands at 26.8M. In comparison, QRTEB has a market cap of 51.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TLF is priced at $3.15, while QRTEB trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.10, whereas QRTEB's P/E ratio is -2.82. In terms of profitability, TLF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to QRTEB's ROE of +4.53%. Regarding short-term risk, TLF is less volatile compared to QRTEB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLF.
TLF vs CTIB Comparison
TLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TLF stands at 26.8M. In comparison, CTIB has a market cap of 48.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TLF is priced at $3.15, while CTIB trades at $2.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.10, whereas CTIB's P/E ratio is -26.67. In terms of profitability, TLF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CTIB's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TLF is less volatile compared to CTIB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLF.
TLF vs PRTS Comparison
TLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TLF stands at 26.8M. In comparison, PRTS has a market cap of 44.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TLF is priced at $3.15, while PRTS trades at $0.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.10, whereas PRTS's P/E ratio is -0.87. In terms of profitability, TLF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to PRTS's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, TLF is less volatile compared to PRTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLF.
TLF vs BBBY Comparison
TLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TLF stands at 26.8M. In comparison, BBBY has a market cap of 42M. Regarding current trading prices, TLF is priced at $3.15, while BBBY trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.10, whereas BBBY's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, TLF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to BBBY's ROE of +2.66%. Regarding short-term risk, TLF is less volatile compared to BBBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLF.
TLF vs SSU Comparison
TLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TLF stands at 26.8M. In comparison, SSU has a market cap of 36.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TLF is priced at $3.15, while SSU trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.10, whereas SSU's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, TLF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SSU's ROE of -1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TLF is less volatile compared to SSU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLF.
TLF vs BGFV Comparison
TLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TLF stands at 26.8M. In comparison, BGFV has a market cap of 32.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TLF is priced at $3.15, while BGFV trades at $1.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.10, whereas BGFV's P/E ratio is -0.40. In terms of profitability, TLF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to BGFV's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, TLF is more volatile compared to BGFV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLF.
TLF vs KIRK Comparison
TLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TLF stands at 26.8M. In comparison, KIRK has a market cap of 27.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TLF is priced at $3.15, while KIRK trades at $1.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.10, whereas KIRK's P/E ratio is -0.74. In terms of profitability, TLF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to KIRK's ROE of +1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, TLF is less volatile compared to KIRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLF.
TLF vs CGTL Comparison
TLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TLF stands at 26.8M. In comparison, CGTL has a market cap of 26.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TLF is priced at $3.15, while CGTL trades at $1.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.10, whereas CGTL's P/E ratio is 6.20. In terms of profitability, TLF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CGTL's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, TLF is less volatile compared to CGTL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLF.
TLF vs QVCGA Comparison
TLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TLF stands at 26.8M. In comparison, QVCGA has a market cap of 24.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TLF is priced at $3.15, while QVCGA trades at $3.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.10, whereas QVCGA's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, TLF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to QVCGA's ROE of +4.53%. Regarding short-term risk, TLF is less volatile compared to QVCGA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLF.
TLF vs QVCGB Comparison
TLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TLF stands at 26.8M. In comparison, QVCGB has a market cap of 23.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TLF is priced at $3.15, while QVCGB trades at $32.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.10, whereas QVCGB's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, TLF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to QVCGB's ROE of +4.53%. Regarding short-term risk, TLF is less volatile compared to QVCGB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLF.
TLF vs IPW Comparison
TLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TLF stands at 26.8M. In comparison, IPW has a market cap of 20.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TLF is priced at $3.15, while IPW trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.10, whereas IPW's P/E ratio is -12.84. In terms of profitability, TLF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to IPW's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TLF is less volatile compared to IPW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLF.
TLF vs JBDI Comparison
TLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TLF stands at 26.8M. In comparison, JBDI has a market cap of 19.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TLF is priced at $3.15, while JBDI trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.10, whereas JBDI's P/E ratio is -6.67. In terms of profitability, TLF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to JBDI's ROE of -1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TLF is less volatile compared to JBDI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLF.
TLF vs LGCB Comparison
TLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TLF stands at 26.8M. In comparison, LGCB has a market cap of 15.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TLF is priced at $3.15, while LGCB trades at $2.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.10, whereas LGCB's P/E ratio is -12.10. In terms of profitability, TLF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to LGCB's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TLF is more volatile compared to LGCB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLF.
TLF vs BOXD Comparison
TLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TLF stands at 26.8M. In comparison, BOXD has a market cap of 14M. Regarding current trading prices, TLF is priced at $3.15, while BOXD trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.10, whereas BOXD's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, TLF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to BOXD's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, TLF is less volatile compared to BOXD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLF.
TLF vs ZOOZ Comparison
TLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TLF stands at 26.8M. In comparison, ZOOZ has a market cap of 12.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TLF is priced at $3.15, while ZOOZ trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.10, whereas ZOOZ's P/E ratio is -0.92. In terms of profitability, TLF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ZOOZ's ROE of -1.98%. Regarding short-term risk, TLF is less volatile compared to ZOOZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLF.
TLF vs LITB Comparison
TLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TLF stands at 26.8M. In comparison, LITB has a market cap of 11.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TLF is priced at $3.15, while LITB trades at $1.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.10, whereas LITB's P/E ratio is 10.17. In terms of profitability, TLF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to LITB's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TLF is less volatile compared to LITB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TLF.