T1 Energy Inc (TE) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (TE) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Electrical Equipment & Parts Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TE | $8.88 | +8.16% | 1.5B | -5.35 | -$1.66 | N/A |
| ETN | $408.26 | +1.39% | 158.5B | 33.57 | $12.16 | +1.05% |
| VRT | $306.97 | +0.99% | 117.9B | 65.04 | $4.72 | +0.07% |
| BE | $275.01 | +9.12% | 78.2B | 241.24 | $1.14 | N/A |
| ABB | $37.13 | -1.14% | 69B | 23.65 | $1.57 | N/A |
| AME | $237.72 | +0.08% | 54.5B | 31.06 | $7.65 | +0.55% |
| HUBB | $514.71 | -0.45% | 27.2B | 27.43 | $18.76 | +1.09% |
| NVT | $163.35 | +0.26% | 26.4B | 43.45 | $3.76 | +0.50% |
| FPS | $54.99 | -0.25% | 13.4B | 166.58 | $0.33 | N/A |
| AEIS | $348.15 | +0.01% | 13.2B | 47.89 | $7.27 | +0.11% |
Stock Comparison
TE vs ETN Comparison July 2026
TE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TE stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ETN has a market cap of 158.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TE is priced at $8.88, while ETN trades at $408.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TE currently has a P/E ratio of -5.35, whereas ETN's P/E ratio is 33.57. In terms of profitability, TE's ROE is -1.46%, compared to ETN's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TE is more volatile compared to ETN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TE.Check ETN's competition here
TE vs VRT Comparison July 2026
TE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TE stands at 1.5B. In comparison, VRT has a market cap of 117.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TE is priced at $8.88, while VRT trades at $306.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TE currently has a P/E ratio of -5.35, whereas VRT's P/E ratio is 65.04. In terms of profitability, TE's ROE is -1.46%, compared to VRT's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, TE is more volatile compared to VRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TE.Check VRT's competition here
TE vs BE Comparison July 2026
TE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TE stands at 1.5B. In comparison, BE has a market cap of 78.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TE is priced at $8.88, while BE trades at $275.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TE currently has a P/E ratio of -5.35, whereas BE's P/E ratio is 241.24. In terms of profitability, TE's ROE is -1.46%, compared to BE's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TE is more volatile compared to BE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TE.Check BE's competition here
TE vs ABB Comparison July 2026
TE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TE stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ABB has a market cap of 69B. Regarding current trading prices, TE is priced at $8.88, while ABB trades at $37.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TE currently has a P/E ratio of -5.35, whereas ABB's P/E ratio is 23.65. In terms of profitability, TE's ROE is -1.46%, compared to ABB's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TE is more volatile compared to ABB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TE.Check ABB's competition here
TE vs AME Comparison July 2026
TE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TE stands at 1.5B. In comparison, AME has a market cap of 54.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TE is priced at $8.88, while AME trades at $237.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TE currently has a P/E ratio of -5.35, whereas AME's P/E ratio is 31.06. In terms of profitability, TE's ROE is -1.46%, compared to AME's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TE is more volatile compared to AME. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TE.Check AME's competition here
TE vs HUBB Comparison July 2026
TE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TE stands at 1.5B. In comparison, HUBB has a market cap of 27.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TE is priced at $8.88, while HUBB trades at $514.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TE currently has a P/E ratio of -5.35, whereas HUBB's P/E ratio is 27.43. In terms of profitability, TE's ROE is -1.46%, compared to HUBB's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TE is more volatile compared to HUBB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TE.Check HUBB's competition here
TE vs NVT Comparison July 2026
TE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TE stands at 1.5B. In comparison, NVT has a market cap of 26.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TE is priced at $8.88, while NVT trades at $163.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TE currently has a P/E ratio of -5.35, whereas NVT's P/E ratio is 43.45. In terms of profitability, TE's ROE is -1.46%, compared to NVT's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TE is more volatile compared to NVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TE.Check NVT's competition here
TE vs FPS Comparison July 2026
TE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TE stands at 1.5B. In comparison, FPS has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TE is priced at $8.88, while FPS trades at $54.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TE currently has a P/E ratio of -5.35, whereas FPS's P/E ratio is 166.58. In terms of profitability, TE's ROE is -1.46%, compared to FPS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TE is more volatile compared to FPS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TE.Check FPS's competition here
TE vs AEIS Comparison July 2026
TE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TE stands at 1.5B. In comparison, AEIS has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TE is priced at $8.88, while AEIS trades at $348.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TE currently has a P/E ratio of -5.35, whereas AEIS's P/E ratio is 47.89. In terms of profitability, TE's ROE is -1.46%, compared to AEIS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TE is more volatile compared to AEIS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TE.Check AEIS's competition here
TE vs AYI Comparison July 2026
TE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TE stands at 1.5B. In comparison, AYI has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, TE is priced at $8.88, while AYI trades at $367.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TE currently has a P/E ratio of -5.35, whereas AYI's P/E ratio is 18.99. In terms of profitability, TE's ROE is -1.46%, compared to AYI's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TE is more volatile compared to AYI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TE.Check AYI's competition here
TE vs POWL Comparison July 2026
TE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TE stands at 1.5B. In comparison, POWL has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TE is priced at $8.88, while POWL trades at $281.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TE currently has a P/E ratio of -5.35, whereas POWL's P/E ratio is 26.62. In terms of profitability, TE's ROE is -1.46%, compared to POWL's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, TE is more volatile compared to POWL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TE.Check POWL's competition here
TE vs ENS Comparison July 2026
TE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TE stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ENS has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TE is priced at $8.88, while ENS trades at $224.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TE currently has a P/E ratio of -5.35, whereas ENS's P/E ratio is 21.16. In terms of profitability, TE's ROE is -1.46%, compared to ENS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TE is more volatile compared to ENS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TE.Check ENS's competition here
TE vs WIRE Comparison July 2026
TE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TE stands at 1.5B. In comparison, WIRE has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TE is priced at $8.88, while WIRE trades at $289.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TE currently has a P/E ratio of -5.35, whereas WIRE's P/E ratio is 15.22. In terms of profitability, TE's ROE is -1.46%, compared to WIRE's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TE is more volatile compared to WIRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TE.Check WIRE's competition here
TE vs HAYW Comparison July 2026
TE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TE stands at 1.5B. In comparison, HAYW has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TE is priced at $8.88, while HAYW trades at $16.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TE currently has a P/E ratio of -5.35, whereas HAYW's P/E ratio is 21.23. In terms of profitability, TE's ROE is -1.46%, compared to HAYW's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TE is more volatile compared to HAYW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TE.Check HAYW's competition here
TE vs PLUG Comparison July 2026
TE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TE stands at 1.5B. In comparison, PLUG has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, TE is priced at $8.88, while PLUG trades at $2.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TE currently has a P/E ratio of -5.35, whereas PLUG's P/E ratio is -6.17. In terms of profitability, TE's ROE is -1.46%, compared to PLUG's ROE of -1.39%. Regarding short-term risk, TE is more volatile compared to PLUG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TE.Check PLUG's competition here
TE vs ATKR Comparison July 2026
TE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TE stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ATKR has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TE is priced at $8.88, while ATKR trades at $75.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TE currently has a P/E ratio of -5.35, whereas ATKR's P/E ratio is 17.14. In terms of profitability, TE's ROE is -1.46%, compared to ATKR's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TE is more volatile compared to ATKR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TE.Check ATKR's competition here
TE vs THR Comparison July 2026
TE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TE stands at 1.5B. In comparison, THR has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, TE is priced at $8.88, while THR trades at $61.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TE currently has a P/E ratio of -5.35, whereas THR's P/E ratio is 44.96. In terms of profitability, TE's ROE is -1.46%, compared to THR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TE is more volatile compared to THR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TE.Check THR's competition here
TE vs PLPC Comparison July 2026
TE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TE stands at 1.5B. In comparison, PLPC has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, TE is priced at $8.88, while PLPC trades at $404.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TE currently has a P/E ratio of -5.35, whereas PLPC's P/E ratio is 47.56. In terms of profitability, TE's ROE is -1.46%, compared to PLPC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TE is more volatile compared to PLPC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TE.Check PLPC's competition here
TE vs AMPX-WT Comparison July 2026
TE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TE stands at 1.5B. In comparison, AMPX-WT has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, TE is priced at $8.88, while AMPX-WT trades at $5.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TE currently has a P/E ratio of -5.35, whereas AMPX-WT's P/E ratio is -19.02. In terms of profitability, TE's ROE is -1.46%, compared to AMPX-WT's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, TE is less volatile compared to AMPX-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TE.Check AMPX-WT's competition here
TE vs AMPX Comparison July 2026
TE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TE stands at 1.5B. In comparison, AMPX has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TE is priced at $8.88, while AMPX trades at $13.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TE currently has a P/E ratio of -5.35, whereas AMPX's P/E ratio is -103.97. In terms of profitability, TE's ROE is -1.46%, compared to AMPX's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, TE is more volatile compared to AMPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TE.Check AMPX's competition here
TE vs HOLI Comparison July 2026
TE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TE stands at 1.5B. In comparison, HOLI has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TE is priced at $8.88, while HOLI trades at $26.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TE currently has a P/E ratio of -5.35, whereas HOLI's P/E ratio is 21.83. In terms of profitability, TE's ROE is -1.46%, compared to HOLI's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TE is more volatile compared to HOLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TE.Check HOLI's competition here
TE vs EOSE Comparison July 2026
TE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TE stands at 1.5B. In comparison, EOSE has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TE is priced at $8.88, while EOSE trades at $6.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TE currently has a P/E ratio of -5.35, whereas EOSE's P/E ratio is -0.91. In terms of profitability, TE's ROE is -1.46%, compared to EOSE's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, TE is more volatile compared to EOSE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TE.Check EOSE's competition here
TE vs FCEL Comparison July 2026
TE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TE stands at 1.5B. In comparison, FCEL has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TE is priced at $8.88, while FCEL trades at $29.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TE currently has a P/E ratio of -5.35, whereas FCEL's P/E ratio is -10.53. In terms of profitability, TE's ROE is -1.46%, compared to FCEL's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, TE is less volatile compared to FCEL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TE.Check FCEL's competition here
TE vs ENR Comparison July 2026
TE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TE stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ENR has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TE is priced at $8.88, while ENR trades at $21.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TE currently has a P/E ratio of -5.35, whereas ENR's P/E ratio is 6.32. In terms of profitability, TE's ROE is -1.46%, compared to ENR's ROE of +1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TE is more volatile compared to ENR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TE.Check ENR's competition here
TE vs ENVX Comparison July 2026
TE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TE stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ENVX has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TE is priced at $8.88, while ENVX trades at $6.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TE currently has a P/E ratio of -5.35, whereas ENVX's P/E ratio is -11.09. In terms of profitability, TE's ROE is -1.46%, compared to ENVX's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, TE is more volatile compared to ENVX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TE.Check ENVX's competition here
TE vs NNE Comparison July 2026
TE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TE stands at 1.5B. In comparison, NNE has a market cap of 886.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TE is priced at $8.88, while NNE trades at $21.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TE currently has a P/E ratio of -5.35, whereas NNE's P/E ratio is -30.90. In terms of profitability, TE's ROE is -1.46%, compared to NNE's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TE is more volatile compared to NNE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TE.Check NNE's competition here
TE vs NRGV Comparison July 2026
TE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TE stands at 1.5B. In comparison, NRGV has a market cap of 800.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TE is priced at $8.88, while NRGV trades at $4.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TE currently has a P/E ratio of -5.35, whereas NRGV's P/E ratio is -6.32. In terms of profitability, TE's ROE is -1.46%, compared to NRGV's ROE of -1.71%. Regarding short-term risk, TE is more volatile compared to NRGV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TE.Check NRGV's competition here
TE vs TE-WT Comparison July 2026
TE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TE stands at 1.5B. In comparison, TE-WT has a market cap of 733.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TE is priced at $8.88, while TE-WT trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TE currently has a P/E ratio of -5.35, whereas TE-WT's P/E ratio is -0.16. In terms of profitability, TE's ROE is -1.46%, compared to TE-WT's ROE of -1.46%. Regarding short-term risk, TE is less volatile compared to TE-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TE.Check TE-WT's competition here
TE vs ADSE Comparison July 2026
TE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TE stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ADSE has a market cap of 725.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TE is priced at $8.88, while ADSE trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TE currently has a P/E ratio of -5.35, whereas ADSE's P/E ratio is -9.72. In terms of profitability, TE's ROE is -1.46%, compared to ADSE's ROE of +4.92%. Regarding short-term risk, TE is less volatile compared to ADSE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TE.Check ADSE's competition here
TE vs ADSEW Comparison July 2026
TE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TE stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ADSEW has a market cap of 724M. Regarding current trading prices, TE is priced at $8.88, while ADSEW trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TE currently has a P/E ratio of -5.35, whereas ADSEW's P/E ratio is -0.43. In terms of profitability, TE's ROE is -1.46%, compared to ADSEW's ROE of +4.92%. Regarding short-term risk, TE is less volatile compared to ADSEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TE.Check ADSEW's competition here
TE vs SLDPW Comparison July 2026
TE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TE stands at 1.5B. In comparison, SLDPW has a market cap of 621.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TE is priced at $8.88, while SLDPW trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TE currently has a P/E ratio of -5.35, whereas SLDPW's P/E ratio is -0.26. In terms of profitability, TE's ROE is -1.46%, compared to SLDPW's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TE is less volatile compared to SLDPW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TE.Check SLDPW's competition here
TE vs KE Comparison July 2026
TE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TE stands at 1.5B. In comparison, KE has a market cap of 598.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TE is priced at $8.88, while KE trades at $24.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TE currently has a P/E ratio of -5.35, whereas KE's P/E ratio is 17.29. In terms of profitability, TE's ROE is -1.46%, compared to KE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TE is more volatile compared to KE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TE.Check KE's competition here
TE vs SLDP Comparison July 2026
TE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TE stands at 1.5B. In comparison, SLDP has a market cap of 480.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TE is priced at $8.88, while SLDP trades at $2.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TE currently has a P/E ratio of -5.35, whereas SLDP's P/E ratio is -5.42. In terms of profitability, TE's ROE is -1.46%, compared to SLDP's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TE is more volatile compared to SLDP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TE.Check SLDP's competition here
TE vs EOSEW Comparison July 2026
TE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TE stands at 1.5B. In comparison, EOSEW has a market cap of 423.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TE is priced at $8.88, while EOSEW trades at $1.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TE currently has a P/E ratio of -5.35, whereas EOSEW's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, TE's ROE is -1.46%, compared to EOSEW's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, TE is less volatile compared to EOSEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TE.Check EOSEW's competition here
TE vs ELVA Comparison July 2026
TE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TE stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ELVA has a market cap of 400.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TE is priced at $8.88, while ELVA trades at $10.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TE currently has a P/E ratio of -5.35, whereas ELVA's P/E ratio is 85.33. In terms of profitability, TE's ROE is -1.46%, compared to ELVA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TE is more volatile compared to ELVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TE.Check ELVA's competition here
TE vs MVST Comparison July 2026
TE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TE stands at 1.5B. In comparison, MVST has a market cap of 376.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TE is priced at $8.88, while MVST trades at $1.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TE currently has a P/E ratio of -5.35, whereas MVST's P/E ratio is -18.83. In terms of profitability, TE's ROE is -1.46%, compared to MVST's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TE is more volatile compared to MVST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TE.Check MVST's competition here
TE vs AIRJW Comparison July 2026
TE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TE stands at 1.5B. In comparison, AIRJW has a market cap of 341.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TE is priced at $8.88, while AIRJW trades at $1.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TE currently has a P/E ratio of -5.35, whereas AIRJW's P/E ratio is -0.88. In terms of profitability, TE's ROE is -1.46%, compared to AIRJW's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, TE is more volatile compared to AIRJW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TE.Check AIRJW's competition here
TE vs MVSTW Comparison July 2026
TE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TE stands at 1.5B. In comparison, MVSTW has a market cap of 333.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TE is priced at $8.88, while MVSTW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TE currently has a P/E ratio of -5.35, whereas MVSTW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, TE's ROE is -1.46%, compared to MVSTW's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TE is less volatile compared to MVSTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TE.Check MVSTW's competition here
TE vs AIRJ Comparison July 2026
TE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TE stands at 1.5B. In comparison, AIRJ has a market cap of 333M. Regarding current trading prices, TE is priced at $8.88, while AIRJ trades at $4.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TE currently has a P/E ratio of -5.35, whereas AIRJ's P/E ratio is -20.00. In terms of profitability, TE's ROE is -1.46%, compared to AIRJ's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, TE is more volatile compared to AIRJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TE.Check AIRJ's competition here
TE vs SES-WT Comparison July 2026
TE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TE stands at 1.5B. In comparison, SES-WT has a market cap of 308.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TE is priced at $8.88, while SES-WT trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TE currently has a P/E ratio of -5.35, whereas SES-WT's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, TE's ROE is -1.46%, compared to SES-WT's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, TE is less volatile compared to SES-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TE.Check SES-WT's competition here
TE vs FREY Comparison July 2026
TE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TE stands at 1.5B. In comparison, FREY has a market cap of 241.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TE is priced at $8.88, while FREY trades at $1.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TE currently has a P/E ratio of -5.35, whereas FREY's P/E ratio is -13.91. In terms of profitability, TE's ROE is -1.46%, compared to FREY's ROE of -1.89%. Regarding short-term risk, TE is more volatile compared to FREY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TE.Check FREY's competition here
TE vs FREY-WT Comparison July 2026
TE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TE stands at 1.5B. In comparison, FREY-WT has a market cap of 241.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TE is priced at $8.88, while FREY-WT trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TE currently has a P/E ratio of -5.35, whereas FREY-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TE's ROE is -1.46%, compared to FREY-WT's ROE of -2.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TE is more volatile compared to FREY-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TE.Check FREY-WT's competition here
TE vs RFIL Comparison July 2026
TE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TE stands at 1.5B. In comparison, RFIL has a market cap of 231.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TE is priced at $8.88, while RFIL trades at $21.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TE currently has a P/E ratio of -5.35, whereas RFIL's P/E ratio is 42.64. In terms of profitability, TE's ROE is -1.46%, compared to RFIL's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TE is more volatile compared to RFIL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TE.Check RFIL's competition here
TE vs LTBR Comparison July 2026
TE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TE stands at 1.5B. In comparison, LTBR has a market cap of 227.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TE is priced at $8.88, while LTBR trades at $8.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TE currently has a P/E ratio of -5.35, whereas LTBR's P/E ratio is -11.39. In terms of profitability, TE's ROE is -1.46%, compared to LTBR's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TE is more volatile compared to LTBR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TE.Check LTBR's competition here
TE vs ESP Comparison July 2026
TE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TE stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ESP has a market cap of 196.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TE is priced at $8.88, while ESP trades at $66.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TE currently has a P/E ratio of -5.35, whereas ESP's P/E ratio is 17.30. In terms of profitability, TE's ROE is -1.46%, compared to ESP's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TE is more volatile compared to ESP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TE.Check ESP's competition here
TE vs ENVXW Comparison July 2026
TE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TE stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ENVXW has a market cap of 158.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TE is priced at $8.88, while ENVXW trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TE currently has a P/E ratio of -5.35, whereas ENVXW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TE's ROE is -1.46%, compared to ENVXW's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, TE is less volatile compared to ENVXW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TE.Check ENVXW's competition here
TE vs TGEN Comparison July 2026
TE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TE stands at 1.5B. In comparison, TGEN has a market cap of 155M. Regarding current trading prices, TE is priced at $8.88, while TGEN trades at $5.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TE currently has a P/E ratio of -5.35, whereas TGEN's P/E ratio is -17.86. In terms of profitability, TE's ROE is -1.46%, compared to TGEN's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, TE is more volatile compared to TGEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TE.Check TGEN's competition here
TE vs EAF Comparison July 2026
TE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TE stands at 1.5B. In comparison, EAF has a market cap of 150.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TE is priced at $8.88, while EAF trades at $5.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TE currently has a P/E ratio of -5.35, whereas EAF's P/E ratio is -0.81. In terms of profitability, TE's ROE is -1.46%, compared to EAF's ROE of +0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, TE is less volatile compared to EAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TE.Check EAF's competition here
TE vs SVT Comparison July 2026
TE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TE stands at 1.5B. In comparison, SVT has a market cap of 120M. Regarding current trading prices, TE is priced at $8.88, while SVT trades at $46.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TE currently has a P/E ratio of -5.35, whereas SVT's P/E ratio is -120.36. In terms of profitability, TE's ROE is -1.46%, compared to SVT's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TE is more volatile compared to SVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TE.Check SVT's competition here
TE vs SKYX Comparison July 2026
TE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TE stands at 1.5B. In comparison, SKYX has a market cap of 111.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TE is priced at $8.88, while SKYX trades at $1.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TE currently has a P/E ratio of -5.35, whereas SKYX's P/E ratio is -3.53. In terms of profitability, TE's ROE is -1.46%, compared to SKYX's ROE of -4.33%. Regarding short-term risk, TE is more volatile compared to SKYX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TE.Check SKYX's competition here
TE vs ULBI Comparison July 2026
TE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TE stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ULBI has a market cap of 100.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TE is priced at $8.88, while ULBI trades at $6.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TE currently has a P/E ratio of -5.35, whereas ULBI's P/E ratio is 67.00. In terms of profitability, TE's ROE is -1.46%, compared to ULBI's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TE is more volatile compared to ULBI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TE.Check ULBI's competition here
TE vs NEOV Comparison July 2026
TE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TE stands at 1.5B. In comparison, NEOV has a market cap of 84.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TE is priced at $8.88, while NEOV trades at $2.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TE currently has a P/E ratio of -5.35, whereas NEOV's P/E ratio is -7.12. In terms of profitability, TE's ROE is -1.46%, compared to NEOV's ROE of -1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, TE is less volatile compared to NEOV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TE.Check NEOV's competition here
TE vs STI Comparison July 2026
TE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TE stands at 1.5B. In comparison, STI has a market cap of 81.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TE is priced at $8.88, while STI trades at $9.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TE currently has a P/E ratio of -5.35, whereas STI's P/E ratio is -0.68. In terms of profitability, TE's ROE is -1.46%, compared to STI's ROE of +4.41%. Regarding short-term risk, TE is less volatile compared to STI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TE.Check STI's competition here
TE vs NVX Comparison July 2026
TE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TE stands at 1.5B. In comparison, NVX has a market cap of 65.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TE is priced at $8.88, while NVX trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TE currently has a P/E ratio of -5.35, whereas NVX's P/E ratio is -0.78. In terms of profitability, TE's ROE is -1.46%, compared to NVX's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, TE is more volatile compared to NVX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TE.Check NVX's competition here
TE vs NEOVW Comparison July 2026
TE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TE stands at 1.5B. In comparison, NEOVW has a market cap of 63.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TE is priced at $8.88, while NEOVW trades at $1.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TE currently has a P/E ratio of -5.35, whereas NEOVW's P/E ratio is -7.97. In terms of profitability, TE's ROE is -1.46%, compared to NEOVW's ROE of -1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, TE is more volatile compared to NEOVW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TE.Check NEOVW's competition here
TE vs CBAT Comparison July 2026
TE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TE stands at 1.5B. In comparison, CBAT has a market cap of 51.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TE is priced at $8.88, while CBAT trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TE currently has a P/E ratio of -5.35, whereas CBAT's P/E ratio is -5.53. In terms of profitability, TE's ROE is -1.46%, compared to CBAT's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TE is more volatile compared to CBAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TE.Check CBAT's competition here
TE vs ZOOZ Comparison July 2026
TE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TE stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ZOOZ has a market cap of 48.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TE is priced at $8.88, while ZOOZ trades at $5.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TE currently has a P/E ratio of -5.35, whereas ZOOZ's P/E ratio is -0.55. In terms of profitability, TE's ROE is -1.46%, compared to ZOOZ's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, TE is less volatile compared to ZOOZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TE.Check ZOOZ's competition here
TE vs OPTT Comparison July 2026
TE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TE stands at 1.5B. In comparison, OPTT has a market cap of 47M. Regarding current trading prices, TE is priced at $8.88, while OPTT trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TE currently has a P/E ratio of -5.35, whereas OPTT's P/E ratio is -1.37. In terms of profitability, TE's ROE is -1.46%, compared to OPTT's ROE of -1.54%. Regarding short-term risk, TE is more volatile compared to OPTT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TE.Check OPTT's competition here
TE vs IPWR Comparison July 2026
TE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TE stands at 1.5B. In comparison, IPWR has a market cap of 45.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TE is priced at $8.88, while IPWR trades at $5.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TE currently has a P/E ratio of -5.35, whereas IPWR's P/E ratio is -4.46. In terms of profitability, TE's ROE is -1.46%, compared to IPWR's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, TE is more volatile compared to IPWR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TE.Check IPWR's competition here
TE vs PPSI Comparison July 2026
TE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TE stands at 1.5B. In comparison, PPSI has a market cap of 43.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TE is priced at $8.88, while PPSI trades at $3.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TE currently has a P/E ratio of -5.35, whereas PPSI's P/E ratio is -6.29. In terms of profitability, TE's ROE is -1.46%, compared to PPSI's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, TE is more volatile compared to PPSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TE.Check PPSI's competition here
TE vs OESX Comparison July 2026
TE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TE stands at 1.5B. In comparison, OESX has a market cap of 40.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TE is priced at $8.88, while OESX trades at $11.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TE currently has a P/E ratio of -5.35, whereas OESX's P/E ratio is -24.17. In terms of profitability, TE's ROE is -1.46%, compared to OESX's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, TE is more volatile compared to OESX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TE.Check OESX's competition here
TE vs APWC Comparison July 2026
TE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TE stands at 1.5B. In comparison, APWC has a market cap of 32M. Regarding current trading prices, TE is priced at $8.88, while APWC trades at $1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TE currently has a P/E ratio of -5.35, whereas APWC's P/E ratio is 4.43. In terms of profitability, TE's ROE is -1.46%, compared to APWC's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TE is more volatile compared to APWC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TE.Check APWC's competition here
TE vs SCWO Comparison July 2026
TE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TE stands at 1.5B. In comparison, SCWO has a market cap of 27.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TE is priced at $8.88, while SCWO trades at $1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TE currently has a P/E ratio of -5.35, whereas SCWO's P/E ratio is -2.11. In terms of profitability, TE's ROE is -1.46%, compared to SCWO's ROE of -3.39%. Regarding short-term risk, TE is less volatile compared to SCWO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TE.Check SCWO's competition here
TE vs DFLI Comparison July 2026
TE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TE stands at 1.5B. In comparison, DFLI has a market cap of 26.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TE is priced at $8.88, while DFLI trades at $2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TE currently has a P/E ratio of -5.35, whereas DFLI's P/E ratio is -0.27. In terms of profitability, TE's ROE is -1.46%, compared to DFLI's ROE of +12.27%. Regarding short-term risk, TE is more volatile compared to DFLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TE.Check DFLI's competition here
TE vs DFLIW Comparison July 2026
TE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TE stands at 1.5B. In comparison, DFLIW has a market cap of 26.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TE is priced at $8.88, while DFLIW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TE currently has a P/E ratio of -5.35, whereas DFLIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TE's ROE is -1.46%, compared to DFLIW's ROE of +12.27%. Regarding short-term risk, TE is more volatile compared to DFLIW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TE.Check DFLIW's competition here
TE vs FLUX Comparison July 2026
TE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TE stands at 1.5B. In comparison, FLUX has a market cap of 13.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TE is priced at $8.88, while FLUX trades at $0.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TE currently has a P/E ratio of -5.35, whereas FLUX's P/E ratio is -2.56. In terms of profitability, TE's ROE is -1.46%, compared to FLUX's ROE of -7.38%. Regarding short-term risk, TE is more volatile compared to FLUX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TE.Check FLUX's competition here
TE vs GWH Comparison July 2026
TE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TE stands at 1.5B. In comparison, GWH has a market cap of 12.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TE is priced at $8.88, while GWH trades at $0.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TE currently has a P/E ratio of -5.35, whereas GWH's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, TE's ROE is -1.46%, compared to GWH's ROE of -12.52%. Regarding short-term risk, TE is less volatile compared to GWH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TE.Check GWH's competition here
TE vs PITA Comparison July 2026
TE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TE stands at 1.5B. In comparison, PITA has a market cap of 11.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TE is priced at $8.88, while PITA trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TE currently has a P/E ratio of -5.35, whereas PITA's P/E ratio is -2.92. In terms of profitability, TE's ROE is -1.46%, compared to PITA's ROE of +2.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TE is more volatile compared to PITA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TE.Check PITA's competition here
TE vs NXU Comparison July 2026
TE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TE stands at 1.5B. In comparison, NXU has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TE is priced at $8.88, while NXU trades at $2.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TE currently has a P/E ratio of -5.35, whereas NXU's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, TE's ROE is -1.46%, compared to NXU's ROE of -1.71%. Regarding short-term risk, TE is more volatile compared to NXU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TE.Check NXU's competition here
TE vs GCDT Comparison July 2026
TE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TE stands at 1.5B. In comparison, GCDT has a market cap of 5.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TE is priced at $8.88, while GCDT trades at $0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TE currently has a P/E ratio of -5.35, whereas GCDT's P/E ratio is -8.76. In terms of profitability, TE's ROE is -1.46%, compared to GCDT's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, TE is more volatile compared to GCDT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TE.Check GCDT's competition here
TE vs POLA Comparison July 2026
TE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TE stands at 1.5B. In comparison, POLA has a market cap of 5M. Regarding current trading prices, TE is priced at $8.88, while POLA trades at $1.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TE currently has a P/E ratio of -5.35, whereas POLA's P/E ratio is -0.57. In terms of profitability, TE's ROE is -1.46%, compared to POLA's ROE of -2.61%. Regarding short-term risk, TE is less volatile compared to POLA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TE.Check POLA's competition here
TE vs GWH-WT Comparison July 2026
TE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TE stands at 1.5B. In comparison, GWH-WT has a market cap of 2.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TE is priced at $8.88, while GWH-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TE currently has a P/E ratio of -5.35, whereas GWH-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TE's ROE is -1.46%, compared to GWH-WT's ROE of -12.52%. Regarding short-term risk, TE is less volatile compared to GWH-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TE.Check GWH-WT's competition here
TE vs XPON Comparison July 2026
TE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TE stands at 1.5B. In comparison, XPON has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TE is priced at $8.88, while XPON trades at $0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TE currently has a P/E ratio of -5.35, whereas XPON's P/E ratio is -0.38. In terms of profitability, TE's ROE is -1.46%, compared to XPON's ROE of -1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TE is more volatile compared to XPON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TE.Check XPON's competition here
TE vs ELPW Comparison July 2026
TE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TE stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ELPW has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TE is priced at $8.88, while ELPW trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TE currently has a P/E ratio of -5.35, whereas ELPW's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, TE's ROE is -1.46%, compared to ELPW's ROE of +3.89%. Regarding short-term risk, TE is more volatile compared to ELPW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TE.Check ELPW's competition here
TE vs CCTG Comparison July 2026
TE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TE stands at 1.5B. In comparison, CCTG has a market cap of 925.3K. Regarding current trading prices, TE is priced at $8.88, while CCTG trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TE currently has a P/E ratio of -5.35, whereas CCTG's P/E ratio is -0.58. In terms of profitability, TE's ROE is -1.46%, compared to CCTG's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TE is more volatile compared to CCTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TE.Check CCTG's competition here
TE vs RAYA Comparison July 2026
TE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TE stands at 1.5B. In comparison, RAYA has a market cap of 267.1K. Regarding current trading prices, TE is priced at $8.88, while RAYA trades at $2.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TE currently has a P/E ratio of -5.35, whereas RAYA's P/E ratio is -0.27. In terms of profitability, TE's ROE is -1.46%, compared to RAYA's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TE is more volatile compared to RAYA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TE.Check RAYA's competition here
TE vs ZOOZW Comparison July 2026
TE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TE stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ZOOZW has a market cap of 231.8K. Regarding current trading prices, TE is priced at $8.88, while ZOOZW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TE currently has a P/E ratio of -5.35, whereas ZOOZW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TE's ROE is -1.46%, compared to ZOOZW's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, TE is more volatile compared to ZOOZW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TE.Check ZOOZW's competition here
TE vs DCFCW Comparison July 2026
TE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TE stands at 1.5B. In comparison, DCFCW has a market cap of 11.2K. Regarding current trading prices, TE is priced at $8.88, while DCFCW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TE currently has a P/E ratio of -5.35, whereas DCFCW's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, TE's ROE is -1.46%, compared to DCFCW's ROE of +1.31%. Regarding short-term risk, TE is more volatile compared to DCFCW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TE.Check DCFCW's competition here
TE vs DCFC Comparison July 2026
TE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TE stands at 1.5B. In comparison, DCFC has a market cap of 9.1K. Regarding current trading prices, TE is priced at $8.88, while DCFC trades at $3.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TE currently has a P/E ratio of -5.35, whereas DCFC's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, TE's ROE is -1.46%, compared to DCFC's ROE of +1.32%. Regarding short-term risk, TE is more volatile compared to DCFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TE.Check DCFC's competition here
TE vs ENR-PA Comparison July 2026
TE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TE stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ENR-PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TE is priced at $8.88, while ENR-PA trades at $89.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TE currently has a P/E ratio of -5.35, whereas ENR-PA's P/E ratio is 42.39. In terms of profitability, TE's ROE is -1.46%, compared to ENR-PA's ROE of +1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TE is more volatile compared to ENR-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TE.Check ENR-PA's competition here
TE vs AIRM Comparison July 2026
TE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TE stands at 1.5B. In comparison, AIRM has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TE is priced at $8.88, while AIRM trades at $42.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TE currently has a P/E ratio of -5.35, whereas AIRM's P/E ratio is 15.80. In terms of profitability, TE's ROE is -1.46%, compared to AIRM's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TE is more volatile compared to AIRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TE.Check AIRM's competition here
TE vs JUNO Comparison July 2026
TE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TE stands at 1.5B. In comparison, JUNO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TE is priced at $8.88, while JUNO trades at $86.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TE currently has a P/E ratio of -5.35, whereas JUNO's P/E ratio is -20.89. In terms of profitability, TE's ROE is -1.46%, compared to JUNO's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, TE is more volatile compared to JUNO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TE.Check JUNO's competition here
TE vs BLNKW Comparison July 2026
TE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TE stands at 1.5B. In comparison, BLNKW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TE is priced at $8.88, while BLNKW trades at $10.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TE currently has a P/E ratio of -5.35, whereas BLNKW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TE's ROE is -1.46%, compared to BLNKW's ROE of -1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TE is less volatile compared to BLNKW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TE.Check BLNKW's competition here
TE vs OCESP Comparison July 2026
TE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TE stands at 1.5B. In comparison, OCESP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TE is priced at $8.88, while OCESP trades at $16.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TE currently has a P/E ratio of -5.35, whereas OCESP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TE's ROE is -1.46%, compared to OCESP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TE is more volatile compared to OCESP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TE.Check OCESP's competition here