EnerSys
EnerSys (ENS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (ENS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Electrical Equipment & Parts Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ENS | $225.39 | -5.94% | 8.7B | 29.45 | $8.05 | +0.44% |
| VRT | $336.99 | -10.43% | 142.5B | 92.74 | $4.00 | +0.05% |
| ABB | $37.13 | -1.14% | 69B | 23.65 | $1.57 | N/A |
| BE | $258.36 | -14.85% | 66.4B | -9208.67 | -$0.03 | N/A |
| AME | $226.76 | -2.32% | 52.2B | 34.43 | $6.62 | +0.56% |
| NVT | $162.03 | -6.86% | 27.3B | 57.50 | $2.94 | +0.48% |
| HUBB | $470.34 | -2.43% | 25.4B | 28.35 | $16.93 | +1.14% |
| AEIS | $309.62 | -10.15% | 12.3B | 67.25 | $4.81 | +0.12% |
| FPS | $42.86 | -14.60% | 11B | 2253.50 | $0.02 | N/A |
| POWL | $260.13 | -12.41% | 10.7B | 57.27 | $5.11 | +0.12% |
Stock Comparison
ENS vs VRT Comparison May 2026
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 8.7B. In comparison, VRT has a market cap of 142.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $225.39, while VRT trades at $336.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.45, whereas VRT's P/E ratio is 92.74. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to VRT's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to VRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.Check VRT's competition here
ENS vs ABB Comparison May 2026
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 8.7B. In comparison, ABB has a market cap of 69B. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $225.39, while ABB trades at $37.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.45, whereas ABB's P/E ratio is 23.65. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ABB's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is more volatile compared to ABB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.Check ABB's competition here
ENS vs BE Comparison May 2026
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 8.7B. In comparison, BE has a market cap of 66.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $225.39, while BE trades at $258.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.45, whereas BE's P/E ratio is -9208.67. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BE's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to BE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.Check BE's competition here
ENS vs AME Comparison May 2026
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 8.7B. In comparison, AME has a market cap of 52.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $225.39, while AME trades at $226.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.45, whereas AME's P/E ratio is 34.43. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AME's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is more volatile compared to AME. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.Check AME's competition here
ENS vs NVT Comparison May 2026
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 8.7B. In comparison, NVT has a market cap of 27.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $225.39, while NVT trades at $162.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.45, whereas NVT's P/E ratio is 57.50. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NVT's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to NVT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.Check NVT's competition here
ENS vs HUBB Comparison May 2026
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 8.7B. In comparison, HUBB has a market cap of 25.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $225.39, while HUBB trades at $470.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.45, whereas HUBB's P/E ratio is 28.35. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HUBB's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is more volatile compared to HUBB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.Check HUBB's competition here
ENS vs AEIS Comparison May 2026
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 8.7B. In comparison, AEIS has a market cap of 12.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $225.39, while AEIS trades at $309.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.45, whereas AEIS's P/E ratio is 67.25. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AEIS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to AEIS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.Check AEIS's competition here
ENS vs FPS Comparison May 2026
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 8.7B. In comparison, FPS has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $225.39, while FPS trades at $42.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.45, whereas FPS's P/E ratio is 2253.50. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to FPS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to FPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.Check FPS's competition here
ENS vs POWL Comparison May 2026
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 8.7B. In comparison, POWL has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $225.39, while POWL trades at $260.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.45, whereas POWL's P/E ratio is 57.27. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to POWL's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to POWL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.Check POWL's competition here
ENS vs AYI Comparison May 2026
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 8.7B. In comparison, AYI has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $225.39, while AYI trades at $284.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.45, whereas AYI's P/E ratio is 20.63. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AYI's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is more volatile compared to AYI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.Check AYI's competition here
ENS vs WIRE Comparison May 2026
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 8.7B. In comparison, WIRE has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $225.39, while WIRE trades at $289.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.45, whereas WIRE's P/E ratio is 15.22. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to WIRE's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is more volatile compared to WIRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.Check WIRE's competition here
ENS vs PLUG Comparison May 2026
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 8.7B. In comparison, PLUG has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $225.39, while PLUG trades at $3.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.45, whereas PLUG's P/E ratio is -2.72. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PLUG's ROE of -1.39%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to PLUG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.Check PLUG's competition here
ENS vs HAYW Comparison May 2026
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 8.7B. In comparison, HAYW has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $225.39, while HAYW trades at $13.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.45, whereas HAYW's P/E ratio is 18.68. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HAYW's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is more volatile compared to HAYW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.Check HAYW's competition here
ENS vs ATKR Comparison May 2026
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 8.7B. In comparison, ATKR has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $225.39, while ATKR trades at $74.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.45, whereas ATKR's P/E ratio is -20.67. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ATKR's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is more volatile compared to ATKR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.Check ATKR's competition here
ENS vs AMPX Comparison May 2026
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 8.7B. In comparison, AMPX has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $225.39, while AMPX trades at $15.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.45, whereas AMPX's P/E ratio is -54.34. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AMPX's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to AMPX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.Check AMPX's competition here
ENS vs EOSE Comparison May 2026
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 8.7B. In comparison, EOSE has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $225.39, while EOSE trades at $7.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.45, whereas EOSE's P/E ratio is -1.23. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to EOSE's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to EOSE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.Check EOSE's competition here
ENS vs PLPC Comparison May 2026
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 8.7B. In comparison, PLPC has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $225.39, while PLPC trades at $336.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.45, whereas PLPC's P/E ratio is 49.99. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PLPC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to PLPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.Check PLPC's competition here
ENS vs HOLI Comparison May 2026
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 8.7B. In comparison, HOLI has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $225.39, while HOLI trades at $26.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.45, whereas HOLI's P/E ratio is 21.83. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HOLI's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is more volatile compared to HOLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.Check HOLI's competition here
ENS vs ENVX Comparison May 2026
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 8.7B. In comparison, ENVX has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $225.39, while ENVX trades at $5.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.45, whereas ENVX's P/E ratio is -7.54. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ENVX's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to ENVX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.Check ENVX's competition here
ENS vs ENR Comparison May 2026
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 8.7B. In comparison, ENR has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $225.39, while ENR trades at $16.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.45, whereas ENR's P/E ratio is 6.15. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ENR's ROE of +1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is more volatile compared to ENR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.Check ENR's competition here
ENS vs FCEL Comparison May 2026
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 8.7B. In comparison, FCEL has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $225.39, while FCEL trades at $17.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.45, whereas FCEL's P/E ratio is -3.29. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to FCEL's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to FCEL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.Check FCEL's competition here
ENS vs TE Comparison May 2026
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 8.7B. In comparison, TE has a market cap of 984.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $225.39, while TE trades at $6.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.45, whereas TE's P/E ratio is -3.03. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TE's ROE of -1.46%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to TE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.Check TE's competition here
ENS vs AMPX-WT Comparison May 2026
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 8.7B. In comparison, AMPX-WT has a market cap of 944.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $225.39, while AMPX-WT trades at $6.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.45, whereas AMPX-WT's P/E ratio is -17.19. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AMPX-WT's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to AMPX-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.Check AMPX-WT's competition here
ENS vs ADSE Comparison May 2026
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 8.7B. In comparison, ADSE has a market cap of 686M. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $225.39, while ADSE trades at $11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.45, whereas ADSE's P/E ratio is -10.56. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ADSE's ROE of +4.92%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to ADSE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.Check ADSE's competition here
ENS vs KE Comparison May 2026
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 8.7B. In comparison, KE has a market cap of 589.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $225.39, while KE trades at $24.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.45, whereas KE's P/E ratio is 23.36. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to KE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is more volatile compared to KE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.Check KE's competition here
ENS vs SLDP Comparison May 2026
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 8.7B. In comparison, SLDP has a market cap of 531.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $225.39, while SLDP trades at $2.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.45, whereas SLDP's P/E ratio is -5.88. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SLDP's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to SLDP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.Check SLDP's competition here
ENS vs MVST Comparison May 2026
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 8.7B. In comparison, MVST has a market cap of 469.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $225.39, while MVST trades at $1.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.45, whereas MVST's P/E ratio is -7.83. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MVST's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to MVST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.Check MVST's competition here
ENS vs EOSEW Comparison May 2026
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 8.7B. In comparison, EOSEW has a market cap of 423.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $225.39, while EOSEW trades at $1.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.45, whereas EOSEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to EOSEW's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to EOSEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.Check EOSEW's competition here
ENS vs ELVA Comparison May 2026
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 8.7B. In comparison, ELVA has a market cap of 373.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $225.39, while ELVA trades at $9.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.45, whereas ELVA's P/E ratio is 86.82. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ELVA's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to ELVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.Check ELVA's competition here
ENS vs LTBR Comparison May 2026
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 8.7B. In comparison, LTBR has a market cap of 296.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $225.39, while LTBR trades at $10.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.45, whereas LTBR's P/E ratio is -15.05. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to LTBR's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to LTBR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.Check LTBR's competition here
ENS vs FREY-WT Comparison May 2026
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 8.7B. In comparison, FREY-WT has a market cap of 241.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $225.39, while FREY-WT trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.45, whereas FREY-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to FREY-WT's ROE of -2.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is more volatile compared to FREY-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.Check FREY-WT's competition here
ENS vs FREY Comparison May 2026
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 8.7B. In comparison, FREY has a market cap of 241.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $225.39, while FREY trades at $1.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.45, whereas FREY's P/E ratio is -13.91. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to FREY's ROE of -1.89%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to FREY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.Check FREY's competition here
ENS vs EAF Comparison May 2026
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 8.7B. In comparison, EAF has a market cap of 233.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $225.39, while EAF trades at $8.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.45, whereas EAF's P/E ratio is -1.04. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to EAF's ROE of +0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to EAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.Check EAF's competition here
ENS vs ESP Comparison May 2026
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 8.7B. In comparison, ESP has a market cap of 199.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $225.39, while ESP trades at $60.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.45, whereas ESP's P/E ratio is 17.48. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ESP's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to ESP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.Check ESP's competition here
ENS vs TGEN Comparison May 2026
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 8.7B. In comparison, TGEN has a market cap of 195.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $225.39, while TGEN trades at $6.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.45, whereas TGEN's P/E ratio is -19.24. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TGEN's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to TGEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.Check TGEN's competition here
ENS vs RFIL Comparison May 2026
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 8.7B. In comparison, RFIL has a market cap of 192.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $225.39, while RFIL trades at $17.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.45, whereas RFIL's P/E ratio is 593.67. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to RFIL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to RFIL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.Check RFIL's competition here
ENS vs ENVXW Comparison May 2026
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 8.7B. In comparison, ENVXW has a market cap of 156.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $225.39, while ENVXW trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.45, whereas ENVXW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ENVXW's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to ENVXW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.Check ENVXW's competition here
ENS vs SVT Comparison May 2026
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 8.7B. In comparison, SVT has a market cap of 120M. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $225.39, while SVT trades at $46.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.45, whereas SVT's P/E ratio is -120.36. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SVT's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is more volatile compared to SVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.Check SVT's competition here
ENS vs SKYX Comparison May 2026
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 8.7B. In comparison, SKYX has a market cap of 117.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $225.39, while SKYX trades at $1.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.45, whereas SKYX's P/E ratio is -3.60. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SKYX's ROE of -4.33%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to SKYX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.Check SKYX's competition here
ENS vs ULBI Comparison May 2026
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 8.7B. In comparison, ULBI has a market cap of 101.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $225.39, while ULBI trades at $6.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.45, whereas ULBI's P/E ratio is -12.39. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ULBI's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to ULBI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.Check ULBI's competition here
ENS vs NVX Comparison May 2026
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 8.7B. In comparison, NVX has a market cap of 93.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $225.39, while NVX trades at $0.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.45, whereas NVX's P/E ratio is -1.24. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NVX's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is more volatile compared to NVX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.Check NVX's competition here
ENS vs NEOV Comparison May 2026
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 8.7B. In comparison, NEOV has a market cap of 87.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $225.39, while NEOV trades at $2.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.45, whereas NEOV's P/E ratio is -8.83. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NEOV's ROE of -1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to NEOV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.Check NEOV's competition here
ENS vs CBAT Comparison May 2026
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 8.7B. In comparison, CBAT has a market cap of 69.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $225.39, while CBAT trades at $0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.45, whereas CBAT's P/E ratio is -7.83. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CBAT's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to CBAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.Check CBAT's competition here
ENS vs OPTT Comparison May 2026
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 8.7B. In comparison, OPTT has a market cap of 60.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $225.39, while OPTT trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.45, whereas OPTT's P/E ratio is -1.68. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to OPTT's ROE of -1.54%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to OPTT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.Check OPTT's competition here
ENS vs NEOVW Comparison May 2026
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 8.7B. In comparison, NEOVW has a market cap of 60.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $225.39, while NEOVW trades at $1.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.45, whereas NEOVW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NEOVW's ROE of -1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to NEOVW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.Check NEOVW's competition here
ENS vs IPWR Comparison May 2026
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 8.7B. In comparison, IPWR has a market cap of 57.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $225.39, while IPWR trades at $5.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.45, whereas IPWR's P/E ratio is -5.28. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to IPWR's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to IPWR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.Check IPWR's competition here
ENS vs TE-WT Comparison May 2026
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 8.7B. In comparison, TE-WT has a market cap of 54.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $225.39, while TE-WT trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.45, whereas TE-WT's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TE-WT's ROE of -1.46%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to TE-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.Check TE-WT's competition here
ENS vs PPSI Comparison May 2026
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 8.7B. In comparison, PPSI has a market cap of 44.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $225.39, while PPSI trades at $4.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.45, whereas PPSI's P/E ratio is -6.86. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PPSI's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to PPSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.Check PPSI's competition here
ENS vs SLDPW Comparison May 2026
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 8.7B. In comparison, SLDPW has a market cap of 41.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $225.39, while SLDPW trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.45, whereas SLDPW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SLDPW's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to SLDPW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.Check SLDPW's competition here
ENS vs OESX Comparison May 2026
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 8.7B. In comparison, OESX has a market cap of 31.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $225.39, while OESX trades at $9.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.45, whereas OESX's P/E ratio is -6.77. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to OESX's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to OESX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.Check OESX's competition here
ENS vs APWC Comparison May 2026
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 8.7B. In comparison, APWC has a market cap of 30.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $225.39, while APWC trades at $1.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.45, whereas APWC's P/E ratio is 8.33. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to APWC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to APWC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.Check APWC's competition here
ENS vs ADSEW Comparison May 2026
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 8.7B. In comparison, ADSEW has a market cap of 30.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $225.39, while ADSEW trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.45, whereas ADSEW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ADSEW's ROE of +4.92%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to ADSEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.Check ADSEW's competition here
ENS vs CHEV Comparison May 2026
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 8.7B. In comparison, CHEV has a market cap of 22.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $225.39, while CHEV trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.45, whereas CHEV's P/E ratio is -50.00. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CHEV's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is more volatile compared to CHEV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.Check CHEV's competition here
ENS vs SDST Comparison May 2026
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 8.7B. In comparison, SDST has a market cap of 19M. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $225.39, while SDST trades at $2.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.45, whereas SDST's P/E ratio is -1.05. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SDST's ROE of +2.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to SDST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.Check SDST's competition here
ENS vs FLUX Comparison May 2026
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 8.7B. In comparison, FLUX has a market cap of 17.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $225.39, while FLUX trades at $1.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.45, whereas FLUX's P/E ratio is -2.88. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to FLUX's ROE of -7.38%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to FLUX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.Check FLUX's competition here
ENS vs STI Comparison May 2026
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 8.7B. In comparison, STI has a market cap of 14.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $225.39, while STI trades at $5.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.45, whereas STI's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to STI's ROE of +3.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to STI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.Check STI's competition here
ENS vs GWH Comparison May 2026
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 8.7B. In comparison, GWH has a market cap of 11.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $225.39, while GWH trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.45, whereas GWH's P/E ratio is -0.27. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GWH's ROE of -12.52%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to GWH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.Check GWH's competition here
ENS vs PITA Comparison May 2026
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 8.7B. In comparison, PITA has a market cap of 11.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $225.39, while PITA trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.45, whereas PITA's P/E ratio is -2.92. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PITA's ROE of +2.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is more volatile compared to PITA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.Check PITA's competition here
ENS vs SES-WT Comparison May 2026
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 8.7B. In comparison, SES-WT has a market cap of 8.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $225.39, while SES-WT trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.45, whereas SES-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SES-WT's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to SES-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.Check SES-WT's competition here
ENS vs GCDT Comparison May 2026
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 8.7B. In comparison, GCDT has a market cap of 7.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $225.39, while GCDT trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.45, whereas GCDT's P/E ratio is -12.67. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GCDT's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to GCDT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.Check GCDT's competition here
ENS vs NXU Comparison May 2026
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 8.7B. In comparison, NXU has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $225.39, while NXU trades at $2.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.45, whereas NXU's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NXU's ROE of -1.71%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is more volatile compared to NXU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.Check NXU's competition here
ENS vs GWH-WT Comparison May 2026
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 8.7B. In comparison, GWH-WT has a market cap of 4.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $225.39, while GWH-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.45, whereas GWH-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GWH-WT's ROE of -12.52%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to GWH-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.Check GWH-WT's competition here
ENS vs POLA Comparison May 2026
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 8.7B. In comparison, POLA has a market cap of 4.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $225.39, while POLA trades at $1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.45, whereas POLA's P/E ratio is -0.45. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to POLA's ROE of -2.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to POLA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.Check POLA's competition here
ENS vs MVSTW Comparison May 2026
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 8.7B. In comparison, MVSTW has a market cap of 3.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $225.39, while MVSTW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.45, whereas MVSTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MVSTW's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to MVSTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.Check MVSTW's competition here
ENS vs ZOOZ Comparison May 2026
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 8.7B. In comparison, ZOOZ has a market cap of 3.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $225.39, while ZOOZ trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.45, whereas ZOOZ's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ZOOZ's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to ZOOZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.Check ZOOZ's competition here
ENS vs XPON Comparison May 2026
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 8.7B. In comparison, XPON has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $225.39, while XPON trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.45, whereas XPON's P/E ratio is -0.52. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to XPON's ROE of -1.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to XPON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.Check XPON's competition here
ENS vs ELPW Comparison May 2026
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 8.7B. In comparison, ELPW has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $225.39, while ELPW trades at $0.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.45, whereas ELPW's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ELPW's ROE of +3.89%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to ELPW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.Check ELPW's competition here
ENS vs DFLI Comparison May 2026
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 8.7B. In comparison, DFLI has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $225.39, while DFLI trades at $1.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.45, whereas DFLI's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DFLI's ROE of +12.52%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to DFLI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.Check DFLI's competition here
ENS vs SDSTW Comparison May 2026
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 8.7B. In comparison, SDSTW has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $225.39, while SDSTW trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.45, whereas SDSTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SDSTW's ROE of +2.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to SDSTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.Check SDSTW's competition here
ENS vs DFLIW Comparison May 2026
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 8.7B. In comparison, DFLIW has a market cap of 715.5K. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $225.39, while DFLIW trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.45, whereas DFLIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DFLIW's ROE of +12.52%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to DFLIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.Check DFLIW's competition here
ENS vs CCTG Comparison May 2026
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 8.7B. In comparison, CCTG has a market cap of 555.9K. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $225.39, while CCTG trades at $0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.45, whereas CCTG's P/E ratio is -0.34. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CCTG's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to CCTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.Check CCTG's competition here
ENS vs RAYA Comparison May 2026
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 8.7B. In comparison, RAYA has a market cap of 324.6K. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $225.39, while RAYA trades at $3.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.45, whereas RAYA's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to RAYA's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to RAYA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.Check RAYA's competition here
ENS vs ZOOZW Comparison May 2026
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 8.7B. In comparison, ZOOZW has a market cap of 242.8K. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $225.39, while ZOOZW trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.45, whereas ZOOZW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ZOOZW's ROE of -0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is more volatile compared to ZOOZW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.Check ZOOZW's competition here
ENS vs DCFCW Comparison May 2026
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 8.7B. In comparison, DCFCW has a market cap of 11.2K. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $225.39, while DCFCW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.45, whereas DCFCW's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DCFCW's ROE of +1.31%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to DCFCW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.Check DCFCW's competition here
ENS vs DCFC Comparison May 2026
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 8.7B. In comparison, DCFC has a market cap of 9.1K. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $225.39, while DCFC trades at $3.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.45, whereas DCFC's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DCFC's ROE of +1.32%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is more volatile compared to DCFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.Check DCFC's competition here
ENS vs BLNKW Comparison May 2026
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 8.7B. In comparison, BLNKW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $225.39, while BLNKW trades at $10.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.45, whereas BLNKW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BLNKW's ROE of -1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is less volatile compared to BLNKW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.Check BLNKW's competition here
ENS vs ENR-PA Comparison May 2026
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 8.7B. In comparison, ENR-PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $225.39, while ENR-PA trades at $89.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.45, whereas ENR-PA's P/E ratio is 42.39. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ENR-PA's ROE of +1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is more volatile compared to ENR-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.Check ENR-PA's competition here
ENS vs AIRM Comparison May 2026
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 8.7B. In comparison, AIRM has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $225.39, while AIRM trades at $42.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.45, whereas AIRM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AIRM's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is more volatile compared to AIRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.Check AIRM's competition here
ENS vs JUNO Comparison May 2026
ENS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENS stands at 8.7B. In comparison, JUNO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ENS is priced at $225.39, while JUNO trades at $86.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.45, whereas JUNO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ENS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to JUNO's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, ENS is more volatile compared to JUNO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENS.Check JUNO's competition here