NuScale Power Corporation
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for SMR
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for SMR
NuScale Power Corporation (SMR) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (SMR) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Renewable Utilities Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMR | $10.24 | +11.18% | 2.9B | -4.68 | -$2.05 | N/A |
| GEV | $997.33 | +0.61% | 267.2B | 55.98 | $17.71 | +0.15% |
| CEG | $294.56 | +2.81% | 91.1B | 39.42 | $7.40 | +0.55% |
| AXIA | $13.50 | +3.57% | 29.5B | 29.81 | $0.44 | +9.68% |
| AQNU | $19.34 | +2.00% | 13.3B | 37.48 | $0.52 | +4.13% |
| BEP | $35.00 | +0.98% | 10.5B | -137.44 | -$0.25 | +4.41% |
| ENLT | $80.50 | +7.92% | 10.5B | 75.55 | $1.00 | N/A |
| CWEN-A | $39.86 | -2.66% | 8.2B | 27.67 | $1.43 | +4.52% |
| CWEN | $39.93 | -2.79% | 8.1B | 27.68 | $1.43 | +4.52% |
| ORA | $113.81 | -1.23% | 6.8B | 55.56 | $2.02 | +0.43% |
Stock Comparison
SMR vs GEV Comparison April 2026
SMR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, GEV has a market cap of 267.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SMR is priced at $10.24, while GEV trades at $997.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMR currently has a P/E ratio of -4.68, whereas GEV's P/E ratio is 55.98. In terms of profitability, SMR's ROE is -0.42%, compared to GEV's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, SMR is more volatile compared to GEV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMR.Check GEV's competition here
SMR vs CEG Comparison April 2026
SMR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, CEG has a market cap of 91.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SMR is priced at $10.24, while CEG trades at $294.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMR currently has a P/E ratio of -4.68, whereas CEG's P/E ratio is 39.42. In terms of profitability, SMR's ROE is -0.42%, compared to CEG's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SMR is more volatile compared to CEG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMR.Check CEG's competition here
SMR vs AXIA Comparison April 2026
SMR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, AXIA has a market cap of 29.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SMR is priced at $10.24, while AXIA trades at $13.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMR currently has a P/E ratio of -4.68, whereas AXIA's P/E ratio is 29.81. In terms of profitability, SMR's ROE is -0.42%, compared to AXIA's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SMR is more volatile compared to AXIA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMR.Check AXIA's competition here
SMR vs AQNU Comparison April 2026
SMR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, AQNU has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SMR is priced at $10.24, while AQNU trades at $19.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMR currently has a P/E ratio of -4.68, whereas AQNU's P/E ratio is 37.48. In terms of profitability, SMR's ROE is -0.42%, compared to AQNU's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SMR is more volatile compared to AQNU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMR.Check AQNU's competition here
SMR vs BEP Comparison April 2026
SMR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, BEP has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SMR is priced at $10.24, while BEP trades at $35.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMR currently has a P/E ratio of -4.68, whereas BEP's P/E ratio is -137.44. In terms of profitability, SMR's ROE is -0.42%, compared to BEP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SMR is more volatile compared to BEP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMR.Check BEP's competition here
SMR vs ENLT Comparison April 2026
SMR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, ENLT has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SMR is priced at $10.24, while ENLT trades at $80.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMR currently has a P/E ratio of -4.68, whereas ENLT's P/E ratio is 75.55. In terms of profitability, SMR's ROE is -0.42%, compared to ENLT's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SMR is more volatile compared to ENLT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMR.Check ENLT's competition here
SMR vs CWEN-A Comparison April 2026
SMR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, CWEN-A has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SMR is priced at $10.24, while CWEN-A trades at $39.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMR currently has a P/E ratio of -4.68, whereas CWEN-A's P/E ratio is 27.67. In terms of profitability, SMR's ROE is -0.42%, compared to CWEN-A's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SMR is more volatile compared to CWEN-A. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMR.Check CWEN-A's competition here
SMR vs CWEN Comparison April 2026
SMR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, CWEN has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SMR is priced at $10.24, while CWEN trades at $39.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMR currently has a P/E ratio of -4.68, whereas CWEN's P/E ratio is 27.68. In terms of profitability, SMR's ROE is -0.42%, compared to CWEN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SMR is more volatile compared to CWEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMR.Check CWEN's competition here
SMR vs ORA Comparison April 2026
SMR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, ORA has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SMR is priced at $10.24, while ORA trades at $113.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMR currently has a P/E ratio of -4.68, whereas ORA's P/E ratio is 55.56. In terms of profitability, SMR's ROE is -0.42%, compared to ORA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SMR is more volatile compared to ORA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMR.Check ORA's competition here
SMR vs BEP-PA Comparison April 2026
SMR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, BEP-PA has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SMR is priced at $10.24, while BEP-PA trades at $17.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMR currently has a P/E ratio of -4.68, whereas BEP-PA's P/E ratio is -34.77. In terms of profitability, SMR's ROE is -0.42%, compared to BEP-PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SMR is more volatile compared to BEP-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMR.Check BEP-PA's competition here
SMR vs BEPC Comparison April 2026
SMR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, BEPC has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SMR is priced at $10.24, while BEPC trades at $42.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMR currently has a P/E ratio of -4.68, whereas BEPC's P/E ratio is -3.21. In terms of profitability, SMR's ROE is -0.42%, compared to BEPC's ROE of -11.97%. Regarding short-term risk, SMR is more volatile compared to BEPC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMR.Check BEPC's competition here
SMR vs AQN Comparison April 2026
SMR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, AQN has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SMR is priced at $10.24, while AQN trades at $6.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMR currently has a P/E ratio of -4.68, whereas AQN's P/E ratio is 23.30. In terms of profitability, SMR's ROE is -0.42%, compared to AQN's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SMR is more volatile compared to AQN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMR.Check AQN's competition here
SMR vs EE Comparison April 2026
SMR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, EE has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SMR is priced at $10.24, while EE trades at $33.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMR currently has a P/E ratio of -4.68, whereas EE's P/E ratio is 26.39. In terms of profitability, SMR's ROE is -0.42%, compared to EE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SMR is more volatile compared to EE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMR.Check EE's competition here
SMR vs AY Comparison April 2026
SMR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, AY has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SMR is priced at $10.24, while AY trades at $21.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMR currently has a P/E ratio of -4.68, whereas AY's P/E ratio is 87.96. In terms of profitability, SMR's ROE is -0.42%, compared to AY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SMR is more volatile compared to AY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMR.Check AY's competition here
SMR vs SMR-WT Comparison April 2026
SMR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, SMR-WT has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SMR is priced at $10.24, while SMR-WT trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMR currently has a P/E ratio of -4.68, whereas SMR-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMR's ROE is -0.42%, compared to SMR-WT's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, SMR is more volatile compared to SMR-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMR.Check SMR-WT's competition here
SMR vs FLNC Comparison April 2026
SMR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, FLNC has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SMR is priced at $10.24, while FLNC trades at $14.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMR currently has a P/E ratio of -4.68, whereas FLNC's P/E ratio is -35.00. In terms of profitability, SMR's ROE is -0.42%, compared to FLNC's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SMR is more volatile compared to FLNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMR.Check FLNC's competition here
SMR vs RNW Comparison April 2026
SMR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, RNW has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SMR is priced at $10.24, while RNW trades at $4.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMR currently has a P/E ratio of -4.68, whereas RNW's P/E ratio is 13.39. In terms of profitability, SMR's ROE is -0.42%, compared to RNW's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SMR is more volatile compared to RNW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMR.Check RNW's competition here
SMR vs NEP Comparison April 2026
SMR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, NEP has a market cap of 985.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SMR is priced at $10.24, while NEP trades at $10.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMR currently has a P/E ratio of -4.68, whereas NEP's P/E ratio is -105.40. In terms of profitability, SMR's ROE is -0.42%, compared to NEP's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMR is more volatile compared to NEP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMR.Check NEP's competition here
SMR vs AMPS Comparison April 2026
SMR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, AMPS has a market cap of 800.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SMR is priced at $10.24, while AMPS trades at $4.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMR currently has a P/E ratio of -4.68, whereas AMPS's P/E ratio is 499.00. In terms of profitability, SMR's ROE is -0.42%, compared to AMPS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SMR is more volatile compared to AMPS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMR.Check AMPS's competition here
SMR vs NRGV Comparison April 2026
SMR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, NRGV has a market cap of 543.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SMR is priced at $10.24, while NRGV trades at $3.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMR currently has a P/E ratio of -4.68, whereas NRGV's P/E ratio is -4.83. In terms of profitability, SMR's ROE is -0.42%, compared to NRGV's ROE of -1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SMR is more volatile compared to NRGV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMR.Check NRGV's competition here
SMR vs ELLO Comparison April 2026
SMR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, ELLO has a market cap of 337.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SMR is priced at $10.24, while ELLO trades at $24.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMR currently has a P/E ratio of -4.68, whereas ELLO's P/E ratio is -153.19. In terms of profitability, SMR's ROE is -0.42%, compared to ELLO's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SMR is more volatile compared to ELLO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMR.Check ELLO's competition here
SMR vs AZRE Comparison April 2026
SMR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, AZRE has a market cap of 108.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SMR is priced at $10.24, while AZRE trades at $1.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMR currently has a P/E ratio of -4.68, whereas AZRE's P/E ratio is -2.14. In terms of profitability, SMR's ROE is -0.42%, compared to AZRE's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SMR is more volatile compared to AZRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMR.Check AZRE's competition here
SMR vs VGAS Comparison April 2026
SMR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, VGAS has a market cap of 74.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SMR is priced at $10.24, while VGAS trades at $1.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMR currently has a P/E ratio of -4.68, whereas VGAS's P/E ratio is -4.28. In terms of profitability, SMR's ROE is -0.42%, compared to VGAS's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, SMR is more volatile compared to VGAS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMR.Check VGAS's competition here
SMR vs NXXT Comparison April 2026
SMR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, NXXT has a market cap of 49.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SMR is priced at $10.24, while NXXT trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMR currently has a P/E ratio of -4.68, whereas NXXT's P/E ratio is -0.77. In terms of profitability, SMR's ROE is -0.42%, compared to NXXT's ROE of -6.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SMR is less volatile compared to NXXT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMR.Check NXXT's competition here
SMR vs WAVE Comparison April 2026
SMR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, WAVE has a market cap of 35.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SMR is priced at $10.24, while WAVE trades at $6.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMR currently has a P/E ratio of -4.68, whereas WAVE's P/E ratio is -9.53. In terms of profitability, SMR's ROE is -0.42%, compared to WAVE's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, SMR is more volatile compared to WAVE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMR.Check WAVE's competition here
SMR vs SUUN Comparison April 2026
SMR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, SUUN has a market cap of 23.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SMR is priced at $10.24, while SUUN trades at $0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMR currently has a P/E ratio of -4.68, whereas SUUN's P/E ratio is -3.87. In terms of profitability, SMR's ROE is -0.42%, compared to SUUN's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, SMR is more volatile compared to SUUN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMR.Check SUUN's competition here
SMR vs RAIN Comparison April 2026
SMR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, RAIN has a market cap of 17.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SMR is priced at $10.24, while RAIN trades at $2.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMR currently has a P/E ratio of -4.68, whereas RAIN's P/E ratio is -3.10. In terms of profitability, SMR's ROE is -0.42%, compared to RAIN's ROE of +0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, SMR is more volatile compared to RAIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMR.Check RAIN's competition here
SMR vs CREG Comparison April 2026
SMR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, CREG has a market cap of 16.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SMR is priced at $10.24, while CREG trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMR currently has a P/E ratio of -4.68, whereas CREG's P/E ratio is -3.74. In terms of profitability, SMR's ROE is -0.42%, compared to CREG's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SMR is less volatile compared to CREG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMR.Check CREG's competition here
SMR vs HLGN-WT Comparison April 2026
SMR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, HLGN-WT has a market cap of 11.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SMR is priced at $10.24, while HLGN-WT trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMR currently has a P/E ratio of -4.68, whereas HLGN-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMR's ROE is -0.42%, compared to HLGN-WT's ROE of +2.79%. Regarding short-term risk, SMR is more volatile compared to HLGN-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMR.Check HLGN-WT's competition here
SMR vs BESS Comparison April 2026
SMR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, BESS has a market cap of 10.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SMR is priced at $10.24, while BESS trades at $2.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMR currently has a P/E ratio of -4.68, whereas BESS's P/E ratio is -2.14. In terms of profitability, SMR's ROE is -0.42%, compared to BESS's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMR is more volatile compared to BESS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMR.Check BESS's competition here
SMR vs HLGN Comparison April 2026
SMR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, HLGN has a market cap of 10.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SMR is priced at $10.24, while HLGN trades at $1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMR currently has a P/E ratio of -4.68, whereas HLGN's P/E ratio is 0.25. In terms of profitability, SMR's ROE is -0.42%, compared to HLGN's ROE of +2.79%. Regarding short-term risk, SMR is more volatile compared to HLGN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMR.Check HLGN's competition here
SMR vs HTOO Comparison April 2026
SMR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, HTOO has a market cap of 5.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SMR is priced at $10.24, while HTOO trades at $2.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMR currently has a P/E ratio of -4.68, whereas HTOO's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, SMR's ROE is -0.42%, compared to HTOO's ROE of -1.78%. Regarding short-term risk, SMR is more volatile compared to HTOO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMR.Check HTOO's competition here
SMR vs RNWWW Comparison April 2026
SMR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, RNWWW has a market cap of 2.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SMR is priced at $10.24, while RNWWW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMR currently has a P/E ratio of -4.68, whereas RNWWW's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, SMR's ROE is -0.42%, compared to RNWWW's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SMR is less volatile compared to RNWWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMR.Check RNWWW's competition here
SMR vs ADN Comparison April 2026
SMR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, ADN has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SMR is priced at $10.24, while ADN trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMR currently has a P/E ratio of -4.68, whereas ADN's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, SMR's ROE is -0.42%, compared to ADN's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SMR is more volatile compared to ADN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMR.Check ADN's competition here
SMR vs ELIQ Comparison April 2026
SMR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, ELIQ has a market cap of 709.5K. Regarding current trading prices, SMR is priced at $10.24, while ELIQ trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMR currently has a P/E ratio of -4.68, whereas ELIQ's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, SMR's ROE is -0.42%, compared to ELIQ's ROE of +0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, SMR is less volatile compared to ELIQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMR.Check ELIQ's competition here
SMR vs BNRG Comparison April 2026
SMR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, BNRG has a market cap of 239.9K. Regarding current trading prices, SMR is priced at $10.24, while BNRG trades at $0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMR currently has a P/E ratio of -4.68, whereas BNRG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMR's ROE is -0.42%, compared to BNRG's ROE of -3.88%. Regarding short-term risk, SMR is less volatile compared to BNRG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMR.Check BNRG's competition here
SMR vs HTOOW Comparison April 2026
SMR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, HTOOW has a market cap of 3.6K. Regarding current trading prices, SMR is priced at $10.24, while HTOOW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMR currently has a P/E ratio of -4.68, whereas HTOOW's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, SMR's ROE is -0.42%, compared to HTOOW's ROE of -1.78%. Regarding short-term risk, SMR is less volatile compared to HTOOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMR.Check HTOOW's competition here
SMR vs ALCE Comparison April 2026
SMR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, ALCE has a market cap of 600. Regarding current trading prices, SMR is priced at $10.24, while ALCE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMR currently has a P/E ratio of -4.68, whereas ALCE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMR's ROE is -0.42%, compared to ALCE's ROE of -1.55%. Regarding short-term risk, SMR is more volatile compared to ALCE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMR.Check ALCE's competition here
SMR vs ADNWW Comparison April 2026
SMR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, ADNWW has a market cap of 544. Regarding current trading prices, SMR is priced at $10.24, while ADNWW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMR currently has a P/E ratio of -4.68, whereas ADNWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMR's ROE is -0.42%, compared to ADNWW's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SMR is less volatile compared to ADNWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMR.Check ADNWW's competition here
SMR vs GXP Comparison April 2026
SMR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, GXP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SMR is priced at $10.24, while GXP trades at $31.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMR currently has a P/E ratio of -4.68, whereas GXP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMR's ROE is -0.42%, compared to GXP's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SMR is more volatile compared to GXP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMR.Check GXP's competition here
SMR vs AMPS-WT Comparison April 2026
SMR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, AMPS-WT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SMR is priced at $10.24, while AMPS-WT trades at $2.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMR currently has a P/E ratio of -4.68, whereas AMPS-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMR's ROE is -0.42%, compared to AMPS-WT's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SMR is more volatile compared to AMPS-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMR.Check AMPS-WT's competition here
SMR vs LFG Comparison April 2026
SMR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, LFG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SMR is priced at $10.24, while LFG trades at $26.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMR currently has a P/E ratio of -4.68, whereas LFG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMR's ROE is -0.42%, compared to LFG's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SMR is more volatile compared to LFG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMR.Check LFG's competition here
SMR vs JNS Comparison April 2026
SMR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, JNS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SMR is priced at $10.24, while JNS trades at $14.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMR currently has a P/E ratio of -4.68, whereas JNS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMR's ROE is -0.42%, compared to JNS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SMR is more volatile compared to JNS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMR.Check JNS's competition here