NuScale Power Corporation (SMR) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

SMR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SMR stands at 3B. In comparison, GEV has a market cap of 252.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SMR is priced at $9.89, while GEV trades at $940.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SMR currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas GEV's P/E ratio is 27.49. In terms of profitability, SMR's ROE is -0.40%, compared to GEV's ROE of +0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, SMR is more volatile compared to GEV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMR.Check GEV's competition here

SMR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SMR stands at 3B. In comparison, CEG has a market cap of 91.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SMR is priced at $9.89, while CEG trades at $253.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SMR currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas CEG's P/E ratio is 22.05. In terms of profitability, SMR's ROE is -0.40%, compared to CEG's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SMR is more volatile compared to CEG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMR.Check CEG's competition here

SMR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SMR stands at 3B. In comparison, AXIA has a market cap of 23.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SMR is priced at $9.89, while AXIA trades at $10.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SMR currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas AXIA's P/E ratio is 12.23. In terms of profitability, SMR's ROE is -0.40%, compared to AXIA's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SMR is more volatile compared to AXIA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMR.Check AXIA's competition here

SMR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SMR stands at 3B. In comparison, ENLT has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SMR is priced at $9.89, while ENLT trades at $95.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SMR currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas ENLT's P/E ratio is 233.49. In terms of profitability, SMR's ROE is -0.40%, compared to ENLT's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SMR is more volatile compared to ENLT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMR.Check ENLT's competition here

SMR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SMR stands at 3B. In comparison, AQNU has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SMR is priced at $9.89, while AQNU trades at $19.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SMR currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas AQNU's P/E ratio is 37.48. In terms of profitability, SMR's ROE is -0.40%, compared to AQNU's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SMR is more volatile compared to AQNU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMR.Check AQNU's competition here

SMR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SMR stands at 3B. In comparison, BEP has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SMR is priced at $9.89, while BEP trades at $34.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SMR currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas BEP's P/E ratio is -114.43. In terms of profitability, SMR's ROE is -0.40%, compared to BEP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SMR is more volatile compared to BEP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMR.Check BEP's competition here

SMR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SMR stands at 3B. In comparison, ORA has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SMR is priced at $9.89, while ORA trades at $138.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SMR currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas ORA's P/E ratio is 67.40. In terms of profitability, SMR's ROE is -0.40%, compared to ORA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SMR is more volatile compared to ORA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMR.Check ORA's competition here

SMR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SMR stands at 3B. In comparison, CWEN-A has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SMR is priced at $9.89, while CWEN-A trades at $40.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SMR currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas CWEN-A's P/E ratio is 28.27. In terms of profitability, SMR's ROE is -0.40%, compared to CWEN-A's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMR is more volatile compared to CWEN-A. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMR.Check CWEN-A's competition here

SMR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SMR stands at 3B. In comparison, CWEN has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SMR is priced at $9.89, while CWEN trades at $37.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SMR currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas CWEN's P/E ratio is 374.70. In terms of profitability, SMR's ROE is -0.40%, compared to CWEN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMR is more volatile compared to CWEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMR.Check CWEN's competition here

SMR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SMR stands at 3B. In comparison, BEP-PA has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SMR is priced at $9.89, while BEP-PA trades at $17.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SMR currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas BEP-PA's P/E ratio is -33.45. In terms of profitability, SMR's ROE is -0.40%, compared to BEP-PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SMR is more volatile compared to BEP-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMR.Check BEP-PA's competition here

SMR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SMR stands at 3B. In comparison, BEPC has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SMR is priced at $9.89, while BEPC trades at $36.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SMR currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas BEPC's P/E ratio is -1.46. In terms of profitability, SMR's ROE is -0.40%, compared to BEPC's ROE of +4.95%. Regarding short-term risk, SMR is more volatile compared to BEPC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMR.Check BEPC's competition here

SMR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SMR stands at 3B. In comparison, AQN has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SMR is priced at $9.89, while AQN trades at $5.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SMR currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas AQN's P/E ratio is 22.88. In terms of profitability, SMR's ROE is -0.40%, compared to AQN's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SMR is more volatile compared to AQN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMR.Check AQN's competition here

SMR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SMR stands at 3B. In comparison, FLNC has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SMR is priced at $9.89, while FLNC trades at $23.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SMR currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas FLNC's P/E ratio is -76.48. In terms of profitability, SMR's ROE is -0.40%, compared to FLNC's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SMR is less volatile compared to FLNC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMR.Check FLNC's competition here

SMR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SMR stands at 3B. In comparison, EE has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, SMR is priced at $9.89, while EE trades at $34.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SMR currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas EE's P/E ratio is 28.77. In terms of profitability, SMR's ROE is -0.40%, compared to EE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SMR is more volatile compared to EE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMR.Check EE's competition here

SMR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SMR stands at 3B. In comparison, AY has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SMR is priced at $9.89, while AY trades at $21.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SMR currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas AY's P/E ratio is 87.96. In terms of profitability, SMR's ROE is -0.40%, compared to AY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SMR is more volatile compared to AY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMR.Check AY's competition here

SMR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SMR stands at 3B. In comparison, SMR-WT has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SMR is priced at $9.89, while SMR-WT trades at $0.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SMR currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas SMR-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMR's ROE is -0.40%, compared to SMR-WT's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, SMR is more volatile compared to SMR-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMR.Check SMR-WT's competition here

SMR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SMR stands at 3B. In comparison, RNWWW has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SMR is priced at $9.89, while RNWWW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SMR currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas RNWWW's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, SMR's ROE is -0.40%, compared to RNWWW's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SMR is more volatile compared to RNWWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMR.Check RNWWW's competition here

SMR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SMR stands at 3B. In comparison, RNW has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SMR is priced at $9.89, while RNW trades at $6.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SMR currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas RNW's P/E ratio is 22.17. In terms of profitability, SMR's ROE is -0.40%, compared to RNW's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SMR is more volatile compared to RNW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMR.Check RNW's competition here

SMR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SMR stands at 3B. In comparison, NEP has a market cap of 985.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SMR is priced at $9.89, while NEP trades at $10.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SMR currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas NEP's P/E ratio is -105.40. In terms of profitability, SMR's ROE is -0.40%, compared to NEP's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SMR is less volatile compared to NEP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMR.Check NEP's competition here

SMR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SMR stands at 3B. In comparison, AMPS has a market cap of 800.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SMR is priced at $9.89, while AMPS trades at $4.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SMR currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas AMPS's P/E ratio is 499.00. In terms of profitability, SMR's ROE is -0.40%, compared to AMPS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SMR is more volatile compared to AMPS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMR.Check AMPS's competition here

SMR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SMR stands at 3B. In comparison, NRGV has a market cap of 768.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SMR is priced at $9.89, while NRGV trades at $4.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SMR currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas NRGV's P/E ratio is -6.07. In terms of profitability, SMR's ROE is -0.40%, compared to NRGV's ROE of -1.71%. Regarding short-term risk, SMR is less volatile compared to NRGV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMR.Check NRGV's competition here

SMR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SMR stands at 3B. In comparison, ELLO has a market cap of 289.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SMR is priced at $9.89, while ELLO trades at $21.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SMR currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas ELLO's P/E ratio is -12.43. In terms of profitability, SMR's ROE is -0.40%, compared to ELLO's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SMR is more volatile compared to ELLO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMR.Check ELLO's competition here

SMR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SMR stands at 3B. In comparison, AZRE has a market cap of 108.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SMR is priced at $9.89, while AZRE trades at $1.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SMR currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas AZRE's P/E ratio is -2.14. In terms of profitability, SMR's ROE is -0.40%, compared to AZRE's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SMR is more volatile compared to AZRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMR.Check AZRE's competition here

SMR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SMR stands at 3B. In comparison, VGAS has a market cap of 62.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SMR is priced at $9.89, while VGAS trades at $1.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SMR currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas VGAS's P/E ratio is -3.89. In terms of profitability, SMR's ROE is -0.40%, compared to VGAS's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SMR is more volatile compared to VGAS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMR.Check VGAS's competition here

SMR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SMR stands at 3B. In comparison, NXXT has a market cap of 54.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SMR is priced at $9.89, while NXXT trades at $0.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SMR currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas NXXT's P/E ratio is 0.55. In terms of profitability, SMR's ROE is -0.40%, compared to NXXT's ROE of +5.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SMR is less volatile compared to NXXT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMR.Check NXXT's competition here

SMR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SMR stands at 3B. In comparison, WAVE has a market cap of 46.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SMR is priced at $9.89, while WAVE trades at $7.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SMR currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas WAVE's P/E ratio is -12.34. In terms of profitability, SMR's ROE is -0.40%, compared to WAVE's ROE of -0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, SMR is less volatile compared to WAVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMR.Check WAVE's competition here

SMR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SMR stands at 3B. In comparison, PBK has a market cap of 42M. Regarding current trading prices, SMR is priced at $9.89, while PBK trades at $0.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SMR currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas PBK's P/E ratio is -6.94. In terms of profitability, SMR's ROE is -0.40%, compared to PBK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SMR is less volatile compared to PBK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMR.Check PBK's competition here

SMR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SMR stands at 3B. In comparison, SUUN has a market cap of 31.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SMR is priced at $9.89, while SUUN trades at $0.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SMR currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas SUUN's P/E ratio is -6.90. In terms of profitability, SMR's ROE is -0.40%, compared to SUUN's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, SMR is less volatile compared to SUUN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMR.Check SUUN's competition here

SMR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SMR stands at 3B. In comparison, RAIN has a market cap of 16.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SMR is priced at $9.89, while RAIN trades at $2.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SMR currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas RAIN's P/E ratio is -1.65. In terms of profitability, SMR's ROE is -0.40%, compared to RAIN's ROE of +0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, SMR is more volatile compared to RAIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMR.Check RAIN's competition here

SMR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SMR stands at 3B. In comparison, BESS has a market cap of 14.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SMR is priced at $9.89, while BESS trades at $3.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SMR currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas BESS's P/E ratio is -2.58. In terms of profitability, SMR's ROE is -0.40%, compared to BESS's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMR is less volatile compared to BESS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMR.Check BESS's competition here

SMR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SMR stands at 3B. In comparison, HLGN-WT has a market cap of 11.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SMR is priced at $9.89, while HLGN-WT trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SMR currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas HLGN-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMR's ROE is -0.40%, compared to HLGN-WT's ROE of +2.79%. Regarding short-term risk, SMR is more volatile compared to HLGN-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMR.Check HLGN-WT's competition here

SMR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SMR stands at 3B. In comparison, HTOO has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SMR is priced at $9.89, while HTOO trades at $2.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SMR currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas HTOO's P/E ratio is -2.06. In terms of profitability, SMR's ROE is -0.40%, compared to HTOO's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SMR is more volatile compared to HTOO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMR.Check HTOO's competition here

SMR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SMR stands at 3B. In comparison, CREG has a market cap of 4.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SMR is priced at $9.89, while CREG trades at $0.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SMR currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas CREG's P/E ratio is 0.28. In terms of profitability, SMR's ROE is -0.40%, compared to CREG's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SMR is less volatile compared to CREG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMR.Check CREG's competition here

SMR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SMR stands at 3B. In comparison, ADN has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SMR is priced at $9.89, while ADN trades at $0.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SMR currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas ADN's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, SMR's ROE is -0.40%, compared to ADN's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SMR is less volatile compared to ADN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMR.Check ADN's competition here

SMR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SMR stands at 3B. In comparison, ELIQ has a market cap of 709.5K. Regarding current trading prices, SMR is priced at $9.89, while ELIQ trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SMR currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas ELIQ's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, SMR's ROE is -0.40%, compared to ELIQ's ROE of +0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, SMR is less volatile compared to ELIQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMR.Check ELIQ's competition here

SMR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SMR stands at 3B. In comparison, BNRG has a market cap of 99.8K. Regarding current trading prices, SMR is priced at $9.89, while BNRG trades at $1.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SMR currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas BNRG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMR's ROE is -0.40%, compared to BNRG's ROE of -3.88%. Regarding short-term risk, SMR is less volatile compared to BNRG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMR.Check BNRG's competition here

SMR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SMR stands at 3B. In comparison, HTOOW has a market cap of 3.6K. Regarding current trading prices, SMR is priced at $9.89, while HTOOW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SMR currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas HTOOW's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, SMR's ROE is -0.40%, compared to HTOOW's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SMR is less volatile compared to HTOOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMR.Check HTOOW's competition here

SMR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SMR stands at 3B. In comparison, ADNWW has a market cap of 544. Regarding current trading prices, SMR is priced at $9.89, while ADNWW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SMR currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas ADNWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMR's ROE is -0.40%, compared to ADNWW's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SMR is less volatile compared to ADNWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMR.Check ADNWW's competition here

SMR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SMR stands at 3B. In comparison, GXP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SMR is priced at $9.89, while GXP trades at $31.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SMR currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas GXP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMR's ROE is -0.40%, compared to GXP's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SMR is more volatile compared to GXP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMR.Check GXP's competition here

SMR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SMR stands at 3B. In comparison, LFG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SMR is priced at $9.89, while LFG trades at $26.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SMR currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas LFG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMR's ROE is -0.40%, compared to LFG's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SMR is more volatile compared to LFG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMR.Check LFG's competition here

SMR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SMR stands at 3B. In comparison, AMPS-WT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SMR is priced at $9.89, while AMPS-WT trades at $2.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SMR currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas AMPS-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMR's ROE is -0.40%, compared to AMPS-WT's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SMR is more volatile compared to AMPS-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMR.Check AMPS-WT's competition here

SMR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SMR stands at 3B. In comparison, JNS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SMR is priced at $9.89, while JNS trades at $14.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SMR currently has a P/E ratio of -4.50, whereas JNS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMR's ROE is -0.40%, compared to JNS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SMR is more volatile compared to JNS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMR.Check JNS's competition here