Kimball Electronics, Inc.
Kimball Electronics, Inc. (KE) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (KE) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Electrical Equipment & Parts Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KE | $24.53 | -1.92% | 589.9M | 23.36 | $1.05 | N/A |
| VRT | $370.94 | -1.41% | 142.5B | 92.74 | $4.00 | +0.05% |
| ABB | $37.13 | -1.14% | 69B | 23.65 | $1.57 | N/A |
| BE | $275.95 | -9.05% | 66.4B | -9208.67 | -$0.03 | N/A |
| AME | $227.90 | -1.83% | 52.2B | 34.43 | $6.62 | +0.56% |
| NVT | $169.01 | -2.85% | 27.3B | 57.50 | $2.94 | +0.48% |
| HUBB | $479.97 | -0.43% | 25.4B | 28.35 | $16.93 | +1.14% |
| AEIS | $323.46 | -6.13% | 12.3B | 67.25 | $4.81 | +0.12% |
| FPS | $45.02 | -10.30% | 11B | 2253.50 | $0.02 | N/A |
| POWL | $292.65 | -1.46% | 10.7B | 57.27 | $5.11 | +0.12% |
Stock Comparison
KE vs VRT Comparison May 2026
KE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KE stands at 589.9M. In comparison, VRT has a market cap of 142.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KE is priced at $24.53, while VRT trades at $370.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KE currently has a P/E ratio of 23.36, whereas VRT's P/E ratio is 92.74. In terms of profitability, KE's ROE is +0.05%, compared to VRT's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, KE is less volatile compared to VRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KE.Check VRT's competition here
KE vs ABB Comparison May 2026
KE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KE stands at 589.9M. In comparison, ABB has a market cap of 69B. Regarding current trading prices, KE is priced at $24.53, while ABB trades at $37.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KE currently has a P/E ratio of 23.36, whereas ABB's P/E ratio is 23.65. In terms of profitability, KE's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ABB's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KE is more volatile compared to ABB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KE.Check ABB's competition here
KE vs BE Comparison May 2026
KE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KE stands at 589.9M. In comparison, BE has a market cap of 66.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KE is priced at $24.53, while BE trades at $275.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KE currently has a P/E ratio of 23.36, whereas BE's P/E ratio is -9208.67. In terms of profitability, KE's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BE's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KE is less volatile compared to BE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KE.Check BE's competition here
KE vs AME Comparison May 2026
KE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KE stands at 589.9M. In comparison, AME has a market cap of 52.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KE is priced at $24.53, while AME trades at $227.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KE currently has a P/E ratio of 23.36, whereas AME's P/E ratio is 34.43. In terms of profitability, KE's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AME's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KE is more volatile compared to AME. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KE.Check AME's competition here
KE vs NVT Comparison May 2026
KE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KE stands at 589.9M. In comparison, NVT has a market cap of 27.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KE is priced at $24.53, while NVT trades at $169.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KE currently has a P/E ratio of 23.36, whereas NVT's P/E ratio is 57.50. In terms of profitability, KE's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NVT's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KE is less volatile compared to NVT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KE.Check NVT's competition here
KE vs HUBB Comparison May 2026
KE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KE stands at 589.9M. In comparison, HUBB has a market cap of 25.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KE is priced at $24.53, while HUBB trades at $479.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KE currently has a P/E ratio of 23.36, whereas HUBB's P/E ratio is 28.35. In terms of profitability, KE's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HUBB's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, KE is less volatile compared to HUBB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KE.Check HUBB's competition here
KE vs AEIS Comparison May 2026
KE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KE stands at 589.9M. In comparison, AEIS has a market cap of 12.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KE is priced at $24.53, while AEIS trades at $323.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KE currently has a P/E ratio of 23.36, whereas AEIS's P/E ratio is 67.25. In terms of profitability, KE's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AEIS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KE is less volatile compared to AEIS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KE.Check AEIS's competition here
KE vs FPS Comparison May 2026
KE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KE stands at 589.9M. In comparison, FPS has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, KE is priced at $24.53, while FPS trades at $45.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KE currently has a P/E ratio of 23.36, whereas FPS's P/E ratio is 2253.50. In terms of profitability, KE's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FPS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KE is less volatile compared to FPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KE.Check FPS's competition here
KE vs POWL Comparison May 2026
KE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KE stands at 589.9M. In comparison, POWL has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KE is priced at $24.53, while POWL trades at $292.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KE currently has a P/E ratio of 23.36, whereas POWL's P/E ratio is 57.27. In terms of profitability, KE's ROE is +0.05%, compared to POWL's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, KE is less volatile compared to POWL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KE.Check POWL's competition here
KE vs ENS Comparison May 2026
KE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KE stands at 589.9M. In comparison, ENS has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KE is priced at $24.53, while ENS trades at $236.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KE currently has a P/E ratio of 23.36, whereas ENS's P/E ratio is 29.45. In terms of profitability, KE's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ENS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KE is less volatile compared to ENS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KE.Check ENS's competition here
KE vs AYI Comparison May 2026
KE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KE stands at 589.9M. In comparison, AYI has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KE is priced at $24.53, while AYI trades at $281.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KE currently has a P/E ratio of 23.36, whereas AYI's P/E ratio is 20.63. In terms of profitability, KE's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AYI's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KE is less volatile compared to AYI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KE.Check AYI's competition here
KE vs WIRE Comparison May 2026
KE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KE stands at 589.9M. In comparison, WIRE has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KE is priced at $24.53, while WIRE trades at $289.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KE currently has a P/E ratio of 23.36, whereas WIRE's P/E ratio is 15.22. In terms of profitability, KE's ROE is +0.05%, compared to WIRE's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, KE is more volatile compared to WIRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KE.Check WIRE's competition here
KE vs PLUG Comparison May 2026
KE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KE stands at 589.9M. In comparison, PLUG has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KE is priced at $24.53, while PLUG trades at $3.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KE currently has a P/E ratio of 23.36, whereas PLUG's P/E ratio is -2.72. In terms of profitability, KE's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PLUG's ROE of -1.39%. Regarding short-term risk, KE is less volatile compared to PLUG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KE.Check PLUG's competition here
KE vs HAYW Comparison May 2026
KE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KE stands at 589.9M. In comparison, HAYW has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, KE is priced at $24.53, while HAYW trades at $13.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KE currently has a P/E ratio of 23.36, whereas HAYW's P/E ratio is 18.68. In terms of profitability, KE's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HAYW's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KE is more volatile compared to HAYW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KE.Check HAYW's competition here
KE vs ATKR Comparison May 2026
KE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KE stands at 589.9M. In comparison, ATKR has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KE is priced at $24.53, while ATKR trades at $74.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KE currently has a P/E ratio of 23.36, whereas ATKR's P/E ratio is -20.67. In terms of profitability, KE's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ATKR's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KE is less volatile compared to ATKR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KE.Check ATKR's competition here
KE vs AMPX Comparison May 2026
KE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KE stands at 589.9M. In comparison, AMPX has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KE is priced at $24.53, while AMPX trades at $16.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KE currently has a P/E ratio of 23.36, whereas AMPX's P/E ratio is -54.34. In terms of profitability, KE's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AMPX's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, KE is less volatile compared to AMPX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KE.Check AMPX's competition here
KE vs EOSE Comparison May 2026
KE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KE stands at 589.9M. In comparison, EOSE has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KE is priced at $24.53, while EOSE trades at $7.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KE currently has a P/E ratio of 23.36, whereas EOSE's P/E ratio is -1.23. In terms of profitability, KE's ROE is +0.05%, compared to EOSE's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, KE is less volatile compared to EOSE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KE.Check EOSE's competition here
KE vs PLPC Comparison May 2026
KE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KE stands at 589.9M. In comparison, PLPC has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KE is priced at $24.53, while PLPC trades at $347.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KE currently has a P/E ratio of 23.36, whereas PLPC's P/E ratio is 49.99. In terms of profitability, KE's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PLPC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KE is less volatile compared to PLPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KE.Check PLPC's competition here
KE vs HOLI Comparison May 2026
KE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KE stands at 589.9M. In comparison, HOLI has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KE is priced at $24.53, while HOLI trades at $26.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KE currently has a P/E ratio of 23.36, whereas HOLI's P/E ratio is 21.83. In terms of profitability, KE's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HOLI's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KE is more volatile compared to HOLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KE.Check HOLI's competition here
KE vs ENVX Comparison May 2026
KE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KE stands at 589.9M. In comparison, ENVX has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KE is priced at $24.53, while ENVX trades at $6.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KE currently has a P/E ratio of 23.36, whereas ENVX's P/E ratio is -7.54. In terms of profitability, KE's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ENVX's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, KE is less volatile compared to ENVX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KE.Check ENVX's competition here
KE vs ENR Comparison May 2026
KE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KE stands at 589.9M. In comparison, ENR has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KE is priced at $24.53, while ENR trades at $16.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KE currently has a P/E ratio of 23.36, whereas ENR's P/E ratio is 6.15. In terms of profitability, KE's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ENR's ROE of +1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KE is less volatile compared to ENR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KE.Check ENR's competition here
KE vs FCEL Comparison May 2026
KE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KE stands at 589.9M. In comparison, FCEL has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KE is priced at $24.53, while FCEL trades at $21.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KE currently has a P/E ratio of 23.36, whereas FCEL's P/E ratio is -3.29. In terms of profitability, KE's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FCEL's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, KE is less volatile compared to FCEL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KE.Check FCEL's competition here
KE vs TE Comparison May 2026
KE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KE stands at 589.9M. In comparison, TE has a market cap of 984.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KE is priced at $24.53, while TE trades at $5.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KE currently has a P/E ratio of 23.36, whereas TE's P/E ratio is -3.03. In terms of profitability, KE's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TE's ROE of -1.46%. Regarding short-term risk, KE is less volatile compared to TE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KE.Check TE's competition here
KE vs AMPX-WT Comparison May 2026
KE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KE stands at 589.9M. In comparison, AMPX-WT has a market cap of 944.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KE is priced at $24.53, while AMPX-WT trades at $6.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KE currently has a P/E ratio of 23.36, whereas AMPX-WT's P/E ratio is -17.19. In terms of profitability, KE's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AMPX-WT's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, KE is less volatile compared to AMPX-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KE.Check AMPX-WT's competition here
KE vs ADSE Comparison May 2026
KE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KE stands at 589.9M. In comparison, ADSE has a market cap of 686M. Regarding current trading prices, KE is priced at $24.53, while ADSE trades at $11.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KE currently has a P/E ratio of 23.36, whereas ADSE's P/E ratio is -10.56. In terms of profitability, KE's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ADSE's ROE of +4.92%. Regarding short-term risk, KE is less volatile compared to ADSE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KE.Check ADSE's competition here
KE vs SLDP Comparison May 2026
KE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KE stands at 589.9M. In comparison, SLDP has a market cap of 531.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KE is priced at $24.53, while SLDP trades at $2.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KE currently has a P/E ratio of 23.36, whereas SLDP's P/E ratio is -5.88. In terms of profitability, KE's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SLDP's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, KE is less volatile compared to SLDP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KE.Check SLDP's competition here
KE vs MVST Comparison May 2026
KE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KE stands at 589.9M. In comparison, MVST has a market cap of 469.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KE is priced at $24.53, while MVST trades at $1.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KE currently has a P/E ratio of 23.36, whereas MVST's P/E ratio is -7.83. In terms of profitability, KE's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MVST's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KE is less volatile compared to MVST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KE.Check MVST's competition here
KE vs EOSEW Comparison May 2026
KE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KE stands at 589.9M. In comparison, EOSEW has a market cap of 423.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KE is priced at $24.53, while EOSEW trades at $1.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KE currently has a P/E ratio of 23.36, whereas EOSEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KE's ROE is +0.05%, compared to EOSEW's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, KE is less volatile compared to EOSEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KE.Check EOSEW's competition here
KE vs ELVA Comparison May 2026
KE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KE stands at 589.9M. In comparison, ELVA has a market cap of 373.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KE is priced at $24.53, while ELVA trades at $9.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KE currently has a P/E ratio of 23.36, whereas ELVA's P/E ratio is 86.82. In terms of profitability, KE's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ELVA's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KE is less volatile compared to ELVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KE.Check ELVA's competition here
KE vs LTBR Comparison May 2026
KE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KE stands at 589.9M. In comparison, LTBR has a market cap of 296.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KE is priced at $24.53, while LTBR trades at $11.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KE currently has a P/E ratio of 23.36, whereas LTBR's P/E ratio is -15.05. In terms of profitability, KE's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LTBR's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KE is less volatile compared to LTBR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KE.Check LTBR's competition here
KE vs FREY-WT Comparison May 2026
KE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KE stands at 589.9M. In comparison, FREY-WT has a market cap of 241.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KE is priced at $24.53, while FREY-WT trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KE currently has a P/E ratio of 23.36, whereas FREY-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KE's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FREY-WT's ROE of -2.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KE is more volatile compared to FREY-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KE.Check FREY-WT's competition here
KE vs FREY Comparison May 2026
KE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KE stands at 589.9M. In comparison, FREY has a market cap of 241.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KE is priced at $24.53, while FREY trades at $1.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KE currently has a P/E ratio of 23.36, whereas FREY's P/E ratio is -13.91. In terms of profitability, KE's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FREY's ROE of -1.89%. Regarding short-term risk, KE is less volatile compared to FREY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KE.Check FREY's competition here
KE vs EAF Comparison May 2026
KE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KE stands at 589.9M. In comparison, EAF has a market cap of 233.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KE is priced at $24.53, while EAF trades at $8.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KE currently has a P/E ratio of 23.36, whereas EAF's P/E ratio is -1.04. In terms of profitability, KE's ROE is +0.05%, compared to EAF's ROE of +0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, KE is less volatile compared to EAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KE.Check EAF's competition here
KE vs ESP Comparison May 2026
KE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KE stands at 589.9M. In comparison, ESP has a market cap of 199.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KE is priced at $24.53, while ESP trades at $67.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KE currently has a P/E ratio of 23.36, whereas ESP's P/E ratio is 17.48. In terms of profitability, KE's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ESP's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, KE is less volatile compared to ESP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KE.Check ESP's competition here
KE vs TGEN Comparison May 2026
KE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KE stands at 589.9M. In comparison, TGEN has a market cap of 195.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KE is priced at $24.53, while TGEN trades at $6.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KE currently has a P/E ratio of 23.36, whereas TGEN's P/E ratio is -19.24. In terms of profitability, KE's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TGEN's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, KE is less volatile compared to TGEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KE.Check TGEN's competition here
KE vs RFIL Comparison May 2026
KE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KE stands at 589.9M. In comparison, RFIL has a market cap of 192.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KE is priced at $24.53, while RFIL trades at $17.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KE currently has a P/E ratio of 23.36, whereas RFIL's P/E ratio is 593.67. In terms of profitability, KE's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RFIL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KE is less volatile compared to RFIL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KE.Check RFIL's competition here
KE vs ENVXW Comparison May 2026
KE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KE stands at 589.9M. In comparison, ENVXW has a market cap of 156.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KE is priced at $24.53, while ENVXW trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KE currently has a P/E ratio of 23.36, whereas ENVXW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KE's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ENVXW's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, KE is less volatile compared to ENVXW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KE.Check ENVXW's competition here
KE vs SVT Comparison May 2026
KE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KE stands at 589.9M. In comparison, SVT has a market cap of 120M. Regarding current trading prices, KE is priced at $24.53, while SVT trades at $46.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KE currently has a P/E ratio of 23.36, whereas SVT's P/E ratio is -120.36. In terms of profitability, KE's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SVT's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KE is more volatile compared to SVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KE.Check SVT's competition here
KE vs SKYX Comparison May 2026
KE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KE stands at 589.9M. In comparison, SKYX has a market cap of 117.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KE is priced at $24.53, while SKYX trades at $1.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KE currently has a P/E ratio of 23.36, whereas SKYX's P/E ratio is -3.60. In terms of profitability, KE's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SKYX's ROE of -4.33%. Regarding short-term risk, KE is less volatile compared to SKYX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KE.Check SKYX's competition here
KE vs ULBI Comparison May 2026
KE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KE stands at 589.9M. In comparison, ULBI has a market cap of 101.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KE is priced at $24.53, while ULBI trades at $6.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KE currently has a P/E ratio of 23.36, whereas ULBI's P/E ratio is -12.39. In terms of profitability, KE's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ULBI's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KE is less volatile compared to ULBI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KE.Check ULBI's competition here
KE vs NVX Comparison May 2026
KE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KE stands at 589.9M. In comparison, NVX has a market cap of 93.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KE is priced at $24.53, while NVX trades at $0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KE currently has a P/E ratio of 23.36, whereas NVX's P/E ratio is -1.24. In terms of profitability, KE's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NVX's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, KE is less volatile compared to NVX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KE.Check NVX's competition here
KE vs NEOV Comparison May 2026
KE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KE stands at 589.9M. In comparison, NEOV has a market cap of 87.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KE is priced at $24.53, while NEOV trades at $2.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KE currently has a P/E ratio of 23.36, whereas NEOV's P/E ratio is -8.83. In terms of profitability, KE's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NEOV's ROE of -1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, KE is less volatile compared to NEOV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KE.Check NEOV's competition here
KE vs CBAT Comparison May 2026
KE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KE stands at 589.9M. In comparison, CBAT has a market cap of 69.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KE is priced at $24.53, while CBAT trades at $0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KE currently has a P/E ratio of 23.36, whereas CBAT's P/E ratio is -7.83. In terms of profitability, KE's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CBAT's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KE is more volatile compared to CBAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KE.Check CBAT's competition here
KE vs OPTT Comparison May 2026
KE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KE stands at 589.9M. In comparison, OPTT has a market cap of 60.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KE is priced at $24.53, while OPTT trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KE currently has a P/E ratio of 23.36, whereas OPTT's P/E ratio is -1.68. In terms of profitability, KE's ROE is +0.05%, compared to OPTT's ROE of -1.54%. Regarding short-term risk, KE is more volatile compared to OPTT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KE.Check OPTT's competition here
KE vs NEOVW Comparison May 2026
KE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KE stands at 589.9M. In comparison, NEOVW has a market cap of 60.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KE is priced at $24.53, while NEOVW trades at $1.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KE currently has a P/E ratio of 23.36, whereas NEOVW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KE's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NEOVW's ROE of -1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, KE is less volatile compared to NEOVW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KE.Check NEOVW's competition here
KE vs IPWR Comparison May 2026
KE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KE stands at 589.9M. In comparison, IPWR has a market cap of 57.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KE is priced at $24.53, while IPWR trades at $6.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KE currently has a P/E ratio of 23.36, whereas IPWR's P/E ratio is -5.28. In terms of profitability, KE's ROE is +0.05%, compared to IPWR's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, KE is less volatile compared to IPWR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KE.Check IPWR's competition here
KE vs TE-WT Comparison May 2026
KE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KE stands at 589.9M. In comparison, TE-WT has a market cap of 54.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KE is priced at $24.53, while TE-WT trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KE currently has a P/E ratio of 23.36, whereas TE-WT's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, KE's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TE-WT's ROE of -1.46%. Regarding short-term risk, KE is more volatile compared to TE-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KE.Check TE-WT's competition here
KE vs PPSI Comparison May 2026
KE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KE stands at 589.9M. In comparison, PPSI has a market cap of 44.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KE is priced at $24.53, while PPSI trades at $3.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KE currently has a P/E ratio of 23.36, whereas PPSI's P/E ratio is -6.86. In terms of profitability, KE's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PPSI's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KE is less volatile compared to PPSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KE.Check PPSI's competition here
KE vs SLDPW Comparison May 2026
KE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KE stands at 589.9M. In comparison, SLDPW has a market cap of 41.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KE is priced at $24.53, while SLDPW trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KE currently has a P/E ratio of 23.36, whereas SLDPW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KE's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SLDPW's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, KE is less volatile compared to SLDPW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KE.Check SLDPW's competition here
KE vs OESX Comparison May 2026
KE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KE stands at 589.9M. In comparison, OESX has a market cap of 31.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KE is priced at $24.53, while OESX trades at $9.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KE currently has a P/E ratio of 23.36, whereas OESX's P/E ratio is -6.77. In terms of profitability, KE's ROE is +0.05%, compared to OESX's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, KE is less volatile compared to OESX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KE.Check OESX's competition here
KE vs APWC Comparison May 2026
KE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KE stands at 589.9M. In comparison, APWC has a market cap of 30.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KE is priced at $24.53, while APWC trades at $1.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KE currently has a P/E ratio of 23.36, whereas APWC's P/E ratio is 8.33. In terms of profitability, KE's ROE is +0.05%, compared to APWC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KE is less volatile compared to APWC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KE.Check APWC's competition here
KE vs ADSEW Comparison May 2026
KE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KE stands at 589.9M. In comparison, ADSEW has a market cap of 30.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KE is priced at $24.53, while ADSEW trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KE currently has a P/E ratio of 23.36, whereas ADSEW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, KE's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ADSEW's ROE of +4.92%. Regarding short-term risk, KE is less volatile compared to ADSEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KE.Check ADSEW's competition here
KE vs CHEV Comparison May 2026
KE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KE stands at 589.9M. In comparison, CHEV has a market cap of 22.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KE is priced at $24.53, while CHEV trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KE currently has a P/E ratio of 23.36, whereas CHEV's P/E ratio is -50.00. In terms of profitability, KE's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CHEV's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, KE is more volatile compared to CHEV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KE.Check CHEV's competition here
KE vs SDST Comparison May 2026
KE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KE stands at 589.9M. In comparison, SDST has a market cap of 19M. Regarding current trading prices, KE is priced at $24.53, while SDST trades at $2.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KE currently has a P/E ratio of 23.36, whereas SDST's P/E ratio is -1.05. In terms of profitability, KE's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SDST's ROE of +2.27%. Regarding short-term risk, KE is less volatile compared to SDST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KE.Check SDST's competition here
KE vs FLUX Comparison May 2026
KE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KE stands at 589.9M. In comparison, FLUX has a market cap of 17.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KE is priced at $24.53, while FLUX trades at $0.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KE currently has a P/E ratio of 23.36, whereas FLUX's P/E ratio is -2.88. In terms of profitability, KE's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FLUX's ROE of -7.38%. Regarding short-term risk, KE is less volatile compared to FLUX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KE.Check FLUX's competition here
KE vs STI Comparison May 2026
KE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KE stands at 589.9M. In comparison, STI has a market cap of 14.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KE is priced at $24.53, while STI trades at $5.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KE currently has a P/E ratio of 23.36, whereas STI's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, KE's ROE is +0.05%, compared to STI's ROE of +3.24%. Regarding short-term risk, KE is less volatile compared to STI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KE.Check STI's competition here
KE vs GWH Comparison May 2026
KE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KE stands at 589.9M. In comparison, GWH has a market cap of 11.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KE is priced at $24.53, while GWH trades at $0.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KE currently has a P/E ratio of 23.36, whereas GWH's P/E ratio is -0.27. In terms of profitability, KE's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GWH's ROE of -12.52%. Regarding short-term risk, KE is less volatile compared to GWH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KE.Check GWH's competition here
KE vs PITA Comparison May 2026
KE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KE stands at 589.9M. In comparison, PITA has a market cap of 11.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KE is priced at $24.53, while PITA trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KE currently has a P/E ratio of 23.36, whereas PITA's P/E ratio is -2.92. In terms of profitability, KE's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PITA's ROE of +2.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KE is more volatile compared to PITA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KE.Check PITA's competition here
KE vs SES-WT Comparison May 2026
KE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KE stands at 589.9M. In comparison, SES-WT has a market cap of 8.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KE is priced at $24.53, while SES-WT trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KE currently has a P/E ratio of 23.36, whereas SES-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KE's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SES-WT's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, KE is less volatile compared to SES-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KE.Check SES-WT's competition here
KE vs GCDT Comparison May 2026
KE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KE stands at 589.9M. In comparison, GCDT has a market cap of 7.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KE is priced at $24.53, while GCDT trades at $0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KE currently has a P/E ratio of 23.36, whereas GCDT's P/E ratio is -12.67. In terms of profitability, KE's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GCDT's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, KE is less volatile compared to GCDT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KE.Check GCDT's competition here
KE vs NXU Comparison May 2026
KE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KE stands at 589.9M. In comparison, NXU has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KE is priced at $24.53, while NXU trades at $2.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KE currently has a P/E ratio of 23.36, whereas NXU's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, KE's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NXU's ROE of -1.71%. Regarding short-term risk, KE is more volatile compared to NXU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KE.Check NXU's competition here
KE vs GWH-WT Comparison May 2026
KE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KE stands at 589.9M. In comparison, GWH-WT has a market cap of 4.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KE is priced at $24.53, while GWH-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KE currently has a P/E ratio of 23.36, whereas GWH-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KE's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GWH-WT's ROE of -12.52%. Regarding short-term risk, KE is less volatile compared to GWH-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KE.Check GWH-WT's competition here
KE vs POLA Comparison May 2026
KE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KE stands at 589.9M. In comparison, POLA has a market cap of 4.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KE is priced at $24.53, while POLA trades at $1.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KE currently has a P/E ratio of 23.36, whereas POLA's P/E ratio is -0.45. In terms of profitability, KE's ROE is +0.05%, compared to POLA's ROE of -2.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KE is less volatile compared to POLA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KE.Check POLA's competition here
KE vs MVSTW Comparison May 2026
KE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KE stands at 589.9M. In comparison, MVSTW has a market cap of 3.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KE is priced at $24.53, while MVSTW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KE currently has a P/E ratio of 23.36, whereas MVSTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KE's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MVSTW's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KE is less volatile compared to MVSTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KE.Check MVSTW's competition here
KE vs ZOOZ Comparison May 2026
KE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KE stands at 589.9M. In comparison, ZOOZ has a market cap of 3.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KE is priced at $24.53, while ZOOZ trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KE currently has a P/E ratio of 23.36, whereas ZOOZ's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, KE's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ZOOZ's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, KE is less volatile compared to ZOOZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KE.Check ZOOZ's competition here
KE vs XPON Comparison May 2026
KE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KE stands at 589.9M. In comparison, XPON has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KE is priced at $24.53, while XPON trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KE currently has a P/E ratio of 23.36, whereas XPON's P/E ratio is -0.52. In terms of profitability, KE's ROE is +0.05%, compared to XPON's ROE of -1.20%. Regarding short-term risk, KE is less volatile compared to XPON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KE.Check XPON's competition here
KE vs ELPW Comparison May 2026
KE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KE stands at 589.9M. In comparison, ELPW has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KE is priced at $24.53, while ELPW trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KE currently has a P/E ratio of 23.36, whereas ELPW's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, KE's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ELPW's ROE of +3.89%. Regarding short-term risk, KE is less volatile compared to ELPW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KE.Check ELPW's competition here
KE vs DFLI Comparison May 2026
KE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KE stands at 589.9M. In comparison, DFLI has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KE is priced at $24.53, while DFLI trades at $1.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KE currently has a P/E ratio of 23.36, whereas DFLI's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, KE's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DFLI's ROE of +12.52%. Regarding short-term risk, KE is less volatile compared to DFLI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KE.Check DFLI's competition here
KE vs SDSTW Comparison May 2026
KE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KE stands at 589.9M. In comparison, SDSTW has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KE is priced at $24.53, while SDSTW trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KE currently has a P/E ratio of 23.36, whereas SDSTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KE's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SDSTW's ROE of +2.27%. Regarding short-term risk, KE is less volatile compared to SDSTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KE.Check SDSTW's competition here
KE vs DFLIW Comparison May 2026
KE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KE stands at 589.9M. In comparison, DFLIW has a market cap of 715.5K. Regarding current trading prices, KE is priced at $24.53, while DFLIW trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KE currently has a P/E ratio of 23.36, whereas DFLIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KE's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DFLIW's ROE of +12.52%. Regarding short-term risk, KE is less volatile compared to DFLIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KE.Check DFLIW's competition here
KE vs CCTG Comparison May 2026
KE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KE stands at 589.9M. In comparison, CCTG has a market cap of 555.9K. Regarding current trading prices, KE is priced at $24.53, while CCTG trades at $0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KE currently has a P/E ratio of 23.36, whereas CCTG's P/E ratio is -0.34. In terms of profitability, KE's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CCTG's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KE is less volatile compared to CCTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KE.Check CCTG's competition here
KE vs RAYA Comparison May 2026
KE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KE stands at 589.9M. In comparison, RAYA has a market cap of 324.6K. Regarding current trading prices, KE is priced at $24.53, while RAYA trades at $3.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KE currently has a P/E ratio of 23.36, whereas RAYA's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, KE's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RAYA's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KE is less volatile compared to RAYA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KE.Check RAYA's competition here
KE vs ZOOZW Comparison May 2026
KE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KE stands at 589.9M. In comparison, ZOOZW has a market cap of 242.8K. Regarding current trading prices, KE is priced at $24.53, while ZOOZW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KE currently has a P/E ratio of 23.36, whereas ZOOZW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KE's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ZOOZW's ROE of -0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, KE is less volatile compared to ZOOZW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KE.Check ZOOZW's competition here
KE vs DCFCW Comparison May 2026
KE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KE stands at 589.9M. In comparison, DCFCW has a market cap of 11.2K. Regarding current trading prices, KE is priced at $24.53, while DCFCW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KE currently has a P/E ratio of 23.36, whereas DCFCW's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, KE's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DCFCW's ROE of +1.31%. Regarding short-term risk, KE is less volatile compared to DCFCW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KE.Check DCFCW's competition here
KE vs DCFC Comparison May 2026
KE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KE stands at 589.9M. In comparison, DCFC has a market cap of 9.1K. Regarding current trading prices, KE is priced at $24.53, while DCFC trades at $3.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KE currently has a P/E ratio of 23.36, whereas DCFC's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, KE's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DCFC's ROE of +1.32%. Regarding short-term risk, KE is more volatile compared to DCFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KE.Check DCFC's competition here
KE vs BLNKW Comparison May 2026
KE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KE stands at 589.9M. In comparison, BLNKW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KE is priced at $24.53, while BLNKW trades at $10.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KE currently has a P/E ratio of 23.36, whereas BLNKW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KE's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BLNKW's ROE of -1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KE is less volatile compared to BLNKW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KE.Check BLNKW's competition here
KE vs ENR-PA Comparison May 2026
KE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KE stands at 589.9M. In comparison, ENR-PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KE is priced at $24.53, while ENR-PA trades at $89.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KE currently has a P/E ratio of 23.36, whereas ENR-PA's P/E ratio is 42.39. In terms of profitability, KE's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ENR-PA's ROE of +1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KE is more volatile compared to ENR-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KE.Check ENR-PA's competition here
KE vs AIRM Comparison May 2026
KE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KE stands at 589.9M. In comparison, AIRM has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KE is priced at $24.53, while AIRM trades at $42.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KE currently has a P/E ratio of 23.36, whereas AIRM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KE's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AIRM's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KE is more volatile compared to AIRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KE.Check AIRM's competition here
KE vs JUNO Comparison May 2026
KE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KE stands at 589.9M. In comparison, JUNO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KE is priced at $24.53, while JUNO trades at $86.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KE currently has a P/E ratio of 23.36, whereas JUNO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KE's ROE is +0.05%, compared to JUNO's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, KE is more volatile compared to JUNO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KE.Check JUNO's competition here