Factorial Energy Inc. (NASDAQ: FAC) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See FAC's competitors and their performance on the NASDAQ and across the wider stock market.
Peer Comparison Table: Electrical Equipment & Parts Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more for FAC and its NASDAQ peers.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FAC | $5.11 | -7.09% | 141M | -85.17 | -$0.06 | N/A |
| ETN | $404.07 | -2.66% | 156.9B | 33.23 | $12.16 | +1.07% |
| VRT | $290.36 | -4.50% | 111.6B | 61.53 | $4.72 | +0.08% |
| ABB | $37.13 | -1.14% | 69B | 23.65 | $1.57 | N/A |
| AME | $241.97 | +0.34% | 55.5B | 31.64 | $7.65 | +0.54% |
| BE | $184.89 | -14.91% | 52.7B | 162.40 | $1.14 | N/A |
| HUBB | $486.09 | -0.47% | 25.7B | 25.92 | $18.76 | +1.16% |
| NVT | $151.79 | -4.40% | 24.5B | 40.35 | $3.76 | +0.55% |
| AYI | $330.14 | +0.97% | 9.9B | 17.07 | $19.34 | +0.24% |
| FPS | $35.89 | -7.88% | 8.7B | 108.61 | $0.33 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
Eaton Corporation plc (NYSE: ETN)
FAC vs ETN Comparison July 2026
Factorial Energy Inc. (NASDAQ: FAC) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAC stands at 141M. In comparison, ETN has a market cap of 156.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FAC is priced at $5.11 on the NASDAQ, while ETN trades at $404.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAC currently has a P/E ratio of -85.17, whereas ETN's P/E ratio is 33.23. In terms of profitability, FAC's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ETN's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FAC is more volatile compared to ETN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAC.Check ETN's competition here
Vertiv Holdings Co (NYSE: VRT)
FAC vs VRT Comparison July 2026
Factorial Energy Inc. (NASDAQ: FAC) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAC stands at 141M. In comparison, VRT has a market cap of 111.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FAC is priced at $5.11 on the NASDAQ, while VRT trades at $290.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAC currently has a P/E ratio of -85.17, whereas VRT's P/E ratio is 61.53. In terms of profitability, FAC's ROE is -0.02%, compared to VRT's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, FAC is more volatile compared to VRT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAC.Check VRT's competition here
ABB Ltd (NYSE: ABB)
FAC vs ABB Comparison July 2026
Factorial Energy Inc. (NASDAQ: FAC) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAC stands at 141M. In comparison, ABB has a market cap of 69B. Regarding current trading prices, FAC is priced at $5.11 on the NASDAQ, while ABB trades at $37.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAC currently has a P/E ratio of -85.17, whereas ABB's P/E ratio is 23.65. In terms of profitability, FAC's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ABB's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FAC is more volatile compared to ABB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAC.Check ABB's competition here
AMETEK, Inc. (NYSE: AME)
FAC vs AME Comparison July 2026
Factorial Energy Inc. (NASDAQ: FAC) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAC stands at 141M. In comparison, AME has a market cap of 55.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FAC is priced at $5.11 on the NASDAQ, while AME trades at $241.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAC currently has a P/E ratio of -85.17, whereas AME's P/E ratio is 31.64. In terms of profitability, FAC's ROE is -0.02%, compared to AME's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FAC is more volatile compared to AME. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAC.Check AME's competition here
Bloom Energy Corporation (NYSE: BE)
FAC vs BE Comparison July 2026
Factorial Energy Inc. (NASDAQ: FAC) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAC stands at 141M. In comparison, BE has a market cap of 52.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FAC is priced at $5.11 on the NASDAQ, while BE trades at $184.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAC currently has a P/E ratio of -85.17, whereas BE's P/E ratio is 162.40. In terms of profitability, FAC's ROE is -0.02%, compared to BE's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FAC is less volatile compared to BE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAC.Check BE's competition here
Hubbell Incorporated (NYSE: HUBB)
FAC vs HUBB Comparison July 2026
Factorial Energy Inc. (NASDAQ: FAC) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAC stands at 141M. In comparison, HUBB has a market cap of 25.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FAC is priced at $5.11 on the NASDAQ, while HUBB trades at $486.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAC currently has a P/E ratio of -85.17, whereas HUBB's P/E ratio is 25.92. In terms of profitability, FAC's ROE is -0.02%, compared to HUBB's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FAC is more volatile compared to HUBB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAC.Check HUBB's competition here
nVent Electric plc (NYSE: NVT)
FAC vs NVT Comparison July 2026
Factorial Energy Inc. (NASDAQ: FAC) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAC stands at 141M. In comparison, NVT has a market cap of 24.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FAC is priced at $5.11 on the NASDAQ, while NVT trades at $151.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAC currently has a P/E ratio of -85.17, whereas NVT's P/E ratio is 40.35. In terms of profitability, FAC's ROE is -0.02%, compared to NVT's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FAC is more volatile compared to NVT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAC.Check NVT's competition here
Acuity Brands, Inc. (NYSE: AYI)
FAC vs AYI Comparison July 2026
Factorial Energy Inc. (NASDAQ: FAC) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAC stands at 141M. In comparison, AYI has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FAC is priced at $5.11 on the NASDAQ, while AYI trades at $330.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAC currently has a P/E ratio of -85.17, whereas AYI's P/E ratio is 17.07. In terms of profitability, FAC's ROE is -0.02%, compared to AYI's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FAC is more volatile compared to AYI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAC.Check AYI's competition here
Forgent Power Solutions, Inc. (NYSE: FPS)
FAC vs FPS Comparison July 2026
Factorial Energy Inc. (NASDAQ: FAC) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAC stands at 141M. In comparison, FPS has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FAC is priced at $5.11 on the NASDAQ, while FPS trades at $35.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAC currently has a P/E ratio of -85.17, whereas FPS's P/E ratio is 108.61. In terms of profitability, FAC's ROE is -0.02%, compared to FPS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FAC is more volatile compared to FPS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAC.Check FPS's competition here
Powell Industries, Inc. (NASDAQ: POWL)
FAC vs POWL Comparison July 2026
Factorial Energy Inc. (NASDAQ: FAC) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAC stands at 141M. In comparison, POWL has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FAC is priced at $5.11 on the NASDAQ, while POWL trades at $232.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAC currently has a P/E ratio of -85.17, whereas POWL's P/E ratio is 21.98. In terms of profitability, FAC's ROE is -0.02%, compared to POWL's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, FAC is more volatile compared to POWL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAC.Check POWL's competition here
EnerSys (NYSE: ENS)
FAC vs ENS Comparison July 2026
Factorial Energy Inc. (NASDAQ: FAC) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAC stands at 141M. In comparison, ENS has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, FAC is priced at $5.11 on the NASDAQ, while ENS trades at $190.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAC currently has a P/E ratio of -85.17, whereas ENS's P/E ratio is 18.00. In terms of profitability, FAC's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ENS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FAC is more volatile compared to ENS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAC.Check ENS's competition here
Encore Wire Corporation (NASDAQ: WIRE)
FAC vs WIRE Comparison July 2026
Factorial Energy Inc. (NASDAQ: FAC) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAC stands at 141M. In comparison, WIRE has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FAC is priced at $5.11 on the NASDAQ, while WIRE trades at $289.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAC currently has a P/E ratio of -85.17, whereas WIRE's P/E ratio is 15.22. In terms of profitability, FAC's ROE is -0.02%, compared to WIRE's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FAC is more volatile compared to WIRE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAC.Check WIRE's competition here
Hayward Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: HAYW)
FAC vs HAYW Comparison July 2026
Factorial Energy Inc. (NASDAQ: FAC) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAC stands at 141M. In comparison, HAYW has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FAC is priced at $5.11 on the NASDAQ, while HAYW trades at $14.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAC currently has a P/E ratio of -85.17, whereas HAYW's P/E ratio is 18.04. In terms of profitability, FAC's ROE is -0.02%, compared to HAYW's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FAC is more volatile compared to HAYW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAC.Check HAYW's competition here
Versigent PLC (NYSE: VGNT)
FAC vs VGNT Comparison July 2026
Factorial Energy Inc. (NASDAQ: FAC) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAC stands at 141M. In comparison, VGNT has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, FAC is priced at $5.11 on the NASDAQ, while VGNT trades at $41.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAC currently has a P/E ratio of -85.17, whereas VGNT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FAC's ROE is -0.02%, compared to VGNT's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FAC is more volatile compared to VGNT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAC.Check VGNT's competition here
Atkore Inc. (NYSE: ATKR)
FAC vs ATKR Comparison July 2026
Factorial Energy Inc. (NASDAQ: FAC) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAC stands at 141M. In comparison, ATKR has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FAC is priced at $5.11 on the NASDAQ, while ATKR trades at $76.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAC currently has a P/E ratio of -85.17, whereas ATKR's P/E ratio is 17.50. In terms of profitability, FAC's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ATKR's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FAC is more volatile compared to ATKR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAC.Check ATKR's competition here
Plug Power Inc. (NASDAQ: PLUG)
FAC vs PLUG Comparison July 2026
Factorial Energy Inc. (NASDAQ: FAC) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAC stands at 141M. In comparison, PLUG has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FAC is priced at $5.11 on the NASDAQ, while PLUG trades at $2.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAC currently has a P/E ratio of -85.17, whereas PLUG's P/E ratio is -4.02. In terms of profitability, FAC's ROE is -0.02%, compared to PLUG's ROE of -1.39%. Regarding short-term risk, FAC is more volatile compared to PLUG. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAC.Check PLUG's competition here
Thermon Group Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: THR)
FAC vs THR Comparison July 2026
Factorial Energy Inc. (NASDAQ: FAC) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAC stands at 141M. In comparison, THR has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, FAC is priced at $5.11 on the NASDAQ, while THR trades at $61.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAC currently has a P/E ratio of -85.17, whereas THR's P/E ratio is 44.96. In terms of profitability, FAC's ROE is -0.02%, compared to THR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FAC is more volatile compared to THR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAC.Check THR's competition here
Hollysys Automation Technologies Ltd. (NASDAQ: HOLI)
FAC vs HOLI Comparison July 2026
Factorial Energy Inc. (NASDAQ: FAC) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAC stands at 141M. In comparison, HOLI has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FAC is priced at $5.11 on the NASDAQ, while HOLI trades at $26.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAC currently has a P/E ratio of -85.17, whereas HOLI's P/E ratio is 21.83. In terms of profitability, FAC's ROE is -0.02%, compared to HOLI's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FAC is more volatile compared to HOLI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAC.Check HOLI's competition here
Preformed Line Products Company (NASDAQ: PLPC)
FAC vs PLPC Comparison July 2026
Factorial Energy Inc. (NASDAQ: FAC) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAC stands at 141M. In comparison, PLPC has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FAC is priced at $5.11 on the NASDAQ, while PLPC trades at $311.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAC currently has a P/E ratio of -85.17, whereas PLPC's P/E ratio is 36.57. In terms of profitability, FAC's ROE is -0.02%, compared to PLPC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FAC is more volatile compared to PLPC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAC.Check PLPC's competition here
Allient Inc. (NASDAQ: ALNT)
FAC vs ALNT Comparison July 2026
Factorial Energy Inc. (NASDAQ: FAC) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAC stands at 141M. In comparison, ALNT has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FAC is priced at $5.11 on the NASDAQ, while ALNT trades at $86.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAC currently has a P/E ratio of -85.17, whereas ALNT's P/E ratio is 39.27. In terms of profitability, FAC's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ALNT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FAC is more volatile compared to ALNT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAC.Check ALNT's competition here
Energizer Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: ENR)
FAC vs ENR Comparison July 2026
Factorial Energy Inc. (NASDAQ: FAC) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAC stands at 141M. In comparison, ENR has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FAC is priced at $5.11 on the NASDAQ, while ENR trades at $20.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAC currently has a P/E ratio of -85.17, whereas ENR's P/E ratio is 6.11. In terms of profitability, FAC's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ENR's ROE of +1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FAC is more volatile compared to ENR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAC.Check ENR's competition here
Amprius Technologies, Inc. (NYSE: AMPX)
FAC vs AMPX Comparison July 2026
Factorial Energy Inc. (NASDAQ: FAC) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAC stands at 141M. In comparison, AMPX has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FAC is priced at $5.11 on the NASDAQ, while AMPX trades at $9.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAC currently has a P/E ratio of -85.17, whereas AMPX's P/E ratio is -71.08. In terms of profitability, FAC's ROE is -0.02%, compared to AMPX's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, FAC is more volatile compared to AMPX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAC.Check AMPX's competition here
Amprius Technologies, Inc. (NYSE: AMPX-WT)
FAC vs AMPX-WT Comparison July 2026
Factorial Energy Inc. (NASDAQ: FAC) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAC stands at 141M. In comparison, AMPX-WT has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FAC is priced at $5.11 on the NASDAQ, while AMPX-WT trades at $2.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAC currently has a P/E ratio of -85.17, whereas AMPX-WT's P/E ratio is -9.70. In terms of profitability, FAC's ROE is -0.02%, compared to AMPX-WT's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, FAC is less volatile compared to AMPX-WT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAC.Check AMPX-WT's competition here
FuelCell Energy, Inc. (NASDAQ: FCEL)
FAC vs FCEL Comparison July 2026
Factorial Energy Inc. (NASDAQ: FAC) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAC stands at 141M. In comparison, FCEL has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FAC is priced at $5.11 on the NASDAQ, while FCEL trades at $21.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAC currently has a P/E ratio of -85.17, whereas FCEL's P/E ratio is -5.67. In terms of profitability, FAC's ROE is -0.02%, compared to FCEL's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FAC is more volatile compared to FCEL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAC.Check FCEL's competition here
T1 Energy Inc. WT (NYSE: TE-WT)
FAC vs TE-WT Comparison July 2026
Factorial Energy Inc. (NASDAQ: FAC) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAC stands at 141M. In comparison, TE-WT has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FAC is priced at $5.11 on the NASDAQ, while TE-WT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAC currently has a P/E ratio of -85.17, whereas TE-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FAC's ROE is -0.02%, compared to TE-WT's ROE of -1.46%. Regarding short-term risk, FAC is less volatile compared to TE-WT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAC.Check TE-WT's competition here
Eos Energy Enterprises, Inc. (NASDAQ: EOSE)
FAC vs EOSE Comparison July 2026
Factorial Energy Inc. (NASDAQ: FAC) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAC stands at 141M. In comparison, EOSE has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, FAC is priced at $5.11 on the NASDAQ, while EOSE trades at $3.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAC currently has a P/E ratio of -85.17, whereas EOSE's P/E ratio is -0.52. In terms of profitability, FAC's ROE is -0.02%, compared to EOSE's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, FAC is more volatile compared to EOSE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAC.Check EOSE's competition here
Ballard Power Systems Inc. (NASDAQ: BLDP)
FAC vs BLDP Comparison July 2026
Factorial Energy Inc. (NASDAQ: FAC) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAC stands at 141M. In comparison, BLDP has a market cap of 874.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FAC is priced at $5.11 on the NASDAQ, while BLDP trades at $2.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAC currently has a P/E ratio of -85.17, whereas BLDP's P/E ratio is -10.74. In terms of profitability, FAC's ROE is -0.02%, compared to BLDP's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FAC is more volatile compared to BLDP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAC.Check BLDP's competition here
T1 Energy Inc (NYSE: TE)
FAC vs TE Comparison July 2026
Factorial Energy Inc. (NASDAQ: FAC) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAC stands at 141M. In comparison, TE has a market cap of 867.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FAC is priced at $5.11 on the NASDAQ, while TE trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAC currently has a P/E ratio of -85.17, whereas TE's P/E ratio is -2.86. In terms of profitability, FAC's ROE is -0.02%, compared to TE's ROE of -1.46%. Regarding short-term risk, FAC is less volatile compared to TE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAC.Check TE's competition here
Enovix Corporation (NASDAQ: ENVX)
FAC vs ENVX Comparison July 2026
Factorial Energy Inc. (NASDAQ: FAC) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAC stands at 141M. In comparison, ENVX has a market cap of 861.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FAC is priced at $5.11 on the NASDAQ, while ENVX trades at $3.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAC currently has a P/E ratio of -85.17, whereas ENVX's P/E ratio is -7.18. In terms of profitability, FAC's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ENVX's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, FAC is more volatile compared to ENVX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAC.Check ENVX's competition here
ADS-TEC Energy PLC (NASDAQ: ADSEW)
FAC vs ADSEW Comparison July 2026
Factorial Energy Inc. (NASDAQ: FAC) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAC stands at 141M. In comparison, ADSEW has a market cap of 831.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FAC is priced at $5.11 on the NASDAQ, while ADSEW trades at $0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAC currently has a P/E ratio of -85.17, whereas ADSEW's P/E ratio is -0.49. In terms of profitability, FAC's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ADSEW's ROE of +4.92%. Regarding short-term risk, FAC is more volatile compared to ADSEW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAC.Check ADSEW's competition here
ADS-TEC Energy PLC (NASDAQ: ADSE)
FAC vs ADSE Comparison July 2026
Factorial Energy Inc. (NASDAQ: FAC) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAC stands at 141M. In comparison, ADSE has a market cap of 725.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FAC is priced at $5.11 on the NASDAQ, while ADSE trades at $12.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAC currently has a P/E ratio of -85.17, whereas ADSE's P/E ratio is -9.73. In terms of profitability, FAC's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ADSE's ROE of +4.92%. Regarding short-term risk, FAC is more volatile compared to ADSE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAC.Check ADSE's competition here
LSI Industries Inc. (NASDAQ: LYTS)
FAC vs LYTS Comparison July 2026
Factorial Energy Inc. (NASDAQ: FAC) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAC stands at 141M. In comparison, LYTS has a market cap of 724.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FAC is priced at $5.11 on the NASDAQ, while LYTS trades at $23.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAC currently has a P/E ratio of -85.17, whereas LYTS's P/E ratio is 30.97. In terms of profitability, FAC's ROE is -0.02%, compared to LYTS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FAC is more volatile compared to LYTS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAC.Check LYTS's competition here
Nano Nuclear Energy Inc. (NASDAQ: NNE)
FAC vs NNE Comparison July 2026
Factorial Energy Inc. (NASDAQ: FAC) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAC stands at 141M. In comparison, NNE has a market cap of 648.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FAC is priced at $5.11 on the NASDAQ, while NNE trades at $15.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAC currently has a P/E ratio of -85.17, whereas NNE's P/E ratio is -22.59. In terms of profitability, FAC's ROE is -0.02%, compared to NNE's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FAC is more volatile compared to NNE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAC.Check NNE's competition here
Kimball Electronics, Inc. (NASDAQ: KE)
FAC vs KE Comparison July 2026
Factorial Energy Inc. (NASDAQ: FAC) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAC stands at 141M. In comparison, KE has a market cap of 597.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FAC is priced at $5.11 on the NASDAQ, while KE trades at $24.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAC currently has a P/E ratio of -85.17, whereas KE's P/E ratio is 17.26. In terms of profitability, FAC's ROE is -0.02%, compared to KE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FAC is more volatile compared to KE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAC.Check KE's competition here
Energy Vault Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: NRGV)
FAC vs NRGV Comparison July 2026
Factorial Energy Inc. (NASDAQ: FAC) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAC stands at 141M. In comparison, NRGV has a market cap of 513.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FAC is priced at $5.11 on the NASDAQ, while NRGV trades at $2.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAC currently has a P/E ratio of -85.17, whereas NRGV's P/E ratio is -4.06. In terms of profitability, FAC's ROE is -0.02%, compared to NRGV's ROE of -1.71%. Regarding short-term risk, FAC is more volatile compared to NRGV. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAC.Check NRGV's competition here
Eos Energy Enterprises, Inc. (NASDAQ: EOSEW)
FAC vs EOSEW Comparison July 2026
Factorial Energy Inc. (NASDAQ: FAC) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAC stands at 141M. In comparison, EOSEW has a market cap of 423.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FAC is priced at $5.11 on the NASDAQ, while EOSEW trades at $1.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAC currently has a P/E ratio of -85.17, whereas EOSEW's P/E ratio is -0.44. In terms of profitability, FAC's ROE is -0.02%, compared to EOSEW's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, FAC is less volatile compared to EOSEW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAC.Check EOSEW's competition here
Electrovaya Inc. (NASDAQ: ELVA)
FAC vs ELVA Comparison July 2026
Factorial Energy Inc. (NASDAQ: FAC) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAC stands at 141M. In comparison, ELVA has a market cap of 412.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FAC is priced at $5.11 on the NASDAQ, while ELVA trades at $8.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAC currently has a P/E ratio of -85.17, whereas ELVA's P/E ratio is 69.42. In terms of profitability, FAC's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ELVA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FAC is more volatile compared to ELVA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAC.Check ELVA's competition here
Solid Power, Inc. (NASDAQ: SLDPW)
FAC vs SLDPW Comparison July 2026
Factorial Energy Inc. (NASDAQ: FAC) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAC stands at 141M. In comparison, SLDPW has a market cap of 362.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FAC is priced at $5.11 on the NASDAQ, while SLDPW trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAC currently has a P/E ratio of -85.17, whereas SLDPW's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, FAC's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SLDPW's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FAC is more volatile compared to SLDPW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAC.Check SLDPW's competition here
AirJoule Technologies Corporation (NASDAQ: AIRJW)
FAC vs AIRJW Comparison July 2026
Factorial Energy Inc. (NASDAQ: FAC) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAC stands at 141M. In comparison, AIRJW has a market cap of 330.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FAC is priced at $5.11 on the NASDAQ, while AIRJW trades at $1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAC currently has a P/E ratio of -85.17, whereas AIRJW's P/E ratio is -0.91. In terms of profitability, FAC's ROE is -0.02%, compared to AIRJW's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FAC is more volatile compared to AIRJW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAC.Check AIRJW's competition here
Capstone Energy+, Inc. (NASDAQ: CEPL)
FAC vs CEPL Comparison July 2026
Factorial Energy Inc. (NASDAQ: FAC) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAC stands at 141M. In comparison, CEPL has a market cap of 307.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FAC is priced at $5.11 on the NASDAQ, while CEPL trades at $9.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAC currently has a P/E ratio of -85.17, whereas CEPL's P/E ratio is 159.00. In terms of profitability, FAC's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CEPL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FAC is more volatile compared to CEPL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAC.Check CEPL's competition here
AirJoule Technologies Corporation (NASDAQ: AIRJ)
FAC vs AIRJ Comparison July 2026
Factorial Energy Inc. (NASDAQ: FAC) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAC stands at 141M. In comparison, AIRJ has a market cap of 301.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FAC is priced at $5.11 on the NASDAQ, while AIRJ trades at $4.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAC currently has a P/E ratio of -85.17, whereas AIRJ's P/E ratio is -18.13. In terms of profitability, FAC's ROE is -0.02%, compared to AIRJ's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FAC is more volatile compared to AIRJ. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAC.Check AIRJ's competition here
Microvast Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: MVST)
FAC vs MVST Comparison July 2026
Factorial Energy Inc. (NASDAQ: FAC) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAC stands at 141M. In comparison, MVST has a market cap of 266.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FAC is priced at $5.11 on the NASDAQ, while MVST trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAC currently has a P/E ratio of -85.17, whereas MVST's P/E ratio is -13.33. In terms of profitability, FAC's ROE is -0.02%, compared to MVST's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FAC is more volatile compared to MVST. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAC.Check MVST's competition here
FREYR Battery (NYSE: FREY)
FAC vs FREY Comparison July 2026
Factorial Energy Inc. (NASDAQ: FAC) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAC stands at 141M. In comparison, FREY has a market cap of 241.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FAC is priced at $5.11 on the NASDAQ, while FREY trades at $1.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAC currently has a P/E ratio of -85.17, whereas FREY's P/E ratio is -13.91. In terms of profitability, FAC's ROE is -0.02%, compared to FREY's ROE of -1.73%. Regarding short-term risk, FAC is more volatile compared to FREY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAC.Check FREY's competition here
FREYR Battery, Inc. WT (NYSE: FREY-WT)
FAC vs FREY-WT Comparison July 2026
Factorial Energy Inc. (NASDAQ: FAC) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAC stands at 141M. In comparison, FREY-WT has a market cap of 241.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FAC is priced at $5.11 on the NASDAQ, while FREY-WT trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAC currently has a P/E ratio of -85.17, whereas FREY-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FAC's ROE is -0.02%, compared to FREY-WT's ROE of -2.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FAC is more volatile compared to FREY-WT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAC.Check FREY-WT's competition here
Lightbridge Corporation (NASDAQ: LTBR)
FAC vs LTBR Comparison July 2026
Factorial Energy Inc. (NASDAQ: FAC) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAC stands at 141M. In comparison, LTBR has a market cap of 194.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FAC is priced at $5.11 on the NASDAQ, while LTBR trades at $7.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAC currently has a P/E ratio of -85.17, whereas LTBR's P/E ratio is -9.74. In terms of profitability, FAC's ROE is -0.02%, compared to LTBR's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FAC is more volatile compared to LTBR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAC.Check LTBR's competition here
GrafTech International Ltd. (NYSE: EAF)
FAC vs EAF Comparison July 2026
Factorial Energy Inc. (NASDAQ: FAC) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAC stands at 141M. In comparison, EAF has a market cap of 194.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FAC is priced at $5.11 on the NASDAQ, while EAF trades at $7.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAC currently has a P/E ratio of -85.17, whereas EAF's P/E ratio is -1.05. In terms of profitability, FAC's ROE is -0.02%, compared to EAF's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, FAC is less volatile compared to EAF. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAC.Check EAF's competition here
Espey Mfg. & Electronics Corp. (AMEX: ESP)
FAC vs ESP Comparison July 2026
Factorial Energy Inc. (NASDAQ: FAC) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAC stands at 141M. In comparison, ESP has a market cap of 171.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FAC is priced at $5.11 on the NASDAQ, while ESP trades at $57.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAC currently has a P/E ratio of -85.17, whereas ESP's P/E ratio is 15.13. In terms of profitability, FAC's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ESP's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FAC is more volatile compared to ESP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAC.Check ESP's competition here
Enovix Corporation (NASDAQ: ENVXW)
FAC vs ENVXW Comparison July 2026
Factorial Energy Inc. (NASDAQ: FAC) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAC stands at 141M. In comparison, ENVXW has a market cap of 158.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FAC is priced at $5.11 on the NASDAQ, while ENVXW trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAC currently has a P/E ratio of -85.17, whereas ENVXW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FAC's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ENVXW's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, FAC is less volatile compared to ENVXW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAC.Check ENVXW's competition here
SES AI Corporation (NYSE: SES-WT)
FAC vs SES-WT Comparison July 2026
Factorial Energy Inc. (NASDAQ: FAC) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAC stands at 141M. In comparison, SES-WT has a market cap of 157.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FAC is priced at $5.11 on the NASDAQ, while SES-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAC currently has a P/E ratio of -85.17, whereas SES-WT's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, FAC's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SES-WT's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FAC is more volatile compared to SES-WT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAC.Check SES-WT's competition here
RF Industries, Ltd. (NASDAQ: RFIL)
FAC vs RFIL Comparison July 2026
Factorial Energy Inc. (NASDAQ: FAC) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAC stands at 141M. In comparison, RFIL has a market cap of 135.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FAC is priced at $5.11 on the NASDAQ, while RFIL trades at $12.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAC currently has a P/E ratio of -85.17, whereas RFIL's P/E ratio is 24.92. In terms of profitability, FAC's ROE is -0.02%, compared to RFIL's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FAC is more volatile compared to RFIL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAC.Check RFIL's competition here
Microvast Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: MVSTW)
FAC vs MVSTW Comparison July 2026
Factorial Energy Inc. (NASDAQ: FAC) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAC stands at 141M. In comparison, MVSTW has a market cap of 132.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FAC is priced at $5.11 on the NASDAQ, while MVSTW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAC currently has a P/E ratio of -85.17, whereas MVSTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FAC's ROE is -0.02%, compared to MVSTW's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FAC is less volatile compared to MVSTW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAC.Check MVSTW's competition here
SKYX Platforms Corp. (NASDAQ: SKYX)
FAC vs SKYX Comparison July 2026
Factorial Energy Inc. (NASDAQ: FAC) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAC stands at 141M. In comparison, SKYX has a market cap of 125.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FAC is priced at $5.11 on the NASDAQ, while SKYX trades at $1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAC currently has a P/E ratio of -85.17, whereas SKYX's P/E ratio is -3.97. In terms of profitability, FAC's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SKYX's ROE of -4.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FAC is more volatile compared to SKYX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAC.Check SKYX's competition here
Servotronics, Inc. (AMEX: SVT)
FAC vs SVT Comparison July 2026
Factorial Energy Inc. (NASDAQ: FAC) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAC stands at 141M. In comparison, SVT has a market cap of 120M. Regarding current trading prices, FAC is priced at $5.11 on the NASDAQ, while SVT trades at $46.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAC currently has a P/E ratio of -85.17, whereas SVT's P/E ratio is -120.36. In terms of profitability, FAC's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SVT's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FAC is more volatile compared to SVT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAC.Check SVT's competition here
Tecogen Inc. (AMEX: TGEN)
FAC vs TGEN Comparison July 2026
Factorial Energy Inc. (NASDAQ: FAC) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAC stands at 141M. In comparison, TGEN has a market cap of 96.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FAC is priced at $5.11 on the NASDAQ, while TGEN trades at $3.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAC currently has a P/E ratio of -85.17, whereas TGEN's P/E ratio is -11.10. In terms of profitability, FAC's ROE is -0.02%, compared to TGEN's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, FAC is more volatile compared to TGEN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAC.Check TGEN's competition here
Ultralife Corporation (NASDAQ: ULBI)
FAC vs ULBI Comparison July 2026
Factorial Energy Inc. (NASDAQ: FAC) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAC stands at 141M. In comparison, ULBI has a market cap of 88.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FAC is priced at $5.11 on the NASDAQ, while ULBI trades at $5.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAC currently has a P/E ratio of -85.17, whereas ULBI's P/E ratio is 58.89. In terms of profitability, FAC's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ULBI's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FAC is more volatile compared to ULBI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAC.Check ULBI's competition here
NeoVolta Inc (NASDAQ: NEOV)
FAC vs NEOV Comparison July 2026
Factorial Energy Inc. (NASDAQ: FAC) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAC stands at 141M. In comparison, NEOV has a market cap of 77.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FAC is priced at $5.11 on the NASDAQ, while NEOV trades at $2.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAC currently has a P/E ratio of -85.17, whereas NEOV's P/E ratio is -6.52. In terms of profitability, FAC's ROE is -0.02%, compared to NEOV's ROE of -1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, FAC is more volatile compared to NEOV. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAC.Check NEOV's competition here
CPS Technologies Corporation (NASDAQ: CPSH)
FAC vs CPSH Comparison July 2026
Factorial Energy Inc. (NASDAQ: FAC) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAC stands at 141M. In comparison, CPSH has a market cap of 71.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FAC is priced at $5.11 on the NASDAQ, while CPSH trades at $4.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAC currently has a P/E ratio of -85.17, whereas CPSH's P/E ratio is 6342.86. In terms of profitability, FAC's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CPSH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FAC is more volatile compared to CPSH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAC.Check CPSH's competition here
NeoVolta Inc. (NASDAQ: NEOVW)
FAC vs NEOVW Comparison July 2026
Factorial Energy Inc. (NASDAQ: FAC) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAC stands at 141M. In comparison, NEOVW has a market cap of 63.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FAC is priced at $5.11 on the NASDAQ, while NEOVW trades at $1.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAC currently has a P/E ratio of -85.17, whereas NEOVW's P/E ratio is -7.97. In terms of profitability, FAC's ROE is -0.02%, compared to NEOVW's ROE of -1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, FAC is more volatile compared to NEOVW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAC.Check NEOVW's competition here
Novonix Limited (NASDAQ: NVX)
FAC vs NVX Comparison July 2026
Factorial Energy Inc. (NASDAQ: FAC) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAC stands at 141M. In comparison, NVX has a market cap of 61M. Regarding current trading prices, FAC is priced at $5.11 on the NASDAQ, while NVX trades at $0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAC currently has a P/E ratio of -85.17, whereas NVX's P/E ratio is -0.72. In terms of profitability, FAC's ROE is -0.02%, compared to NVX's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, FAC is more volatile compared to NVX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAC.Check NVX's competition here
Solidion Technology Inc. (NASDAQ: STI)
FAC vs STI Comparison July 2026
Factorial Energy Inc. (NASDAQ: FAC) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAC stands at 141M. In comparison, STI has a market cap of 56.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FAC is priced at $5.11 on the NASDAQ, while STI trades at $6.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAC currently has a P/E ratio of -85.17, whereas STI's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, FAC's ROE is -0.02%, compared to STI's ROE of +4.41%. Regarding short-term risk, FAC is more volatile compared to STI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAC.Check STI's competition here
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: CBAT)
FAC vs CBAT Comparison July 2026
Factorial Energy Inc. (NASDAQ: FAC) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAC stands at 141M. In comparison, CBAT has a market cap of 45.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FAC is priced at $5.11 on the NASDAQ, while CBAT trades at $0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAC currently has a P/E ratio of -85.17, whereas CBAT's P/E ratio is -2.84. In terms of profitability, FAC's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CBAT's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FAC is more volatile compared to CBAT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAC.Check CBAT's competition here
ZOOZ Strategy Ltd. (NASDAQ: ZOOZ)
FAC vs ZOOZ Comparison July 2026
Factorial Energy Inc. (NASDAQ: FAC) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAC stands at 141M. In comparison, ZOOZ has a market cap of 41.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FAC is priced at $5.11 on the NASDAQ, while ZOOZ trades at $5.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAC currently has a P/E ratio of -85.17, whereas ZOOZ's P/E ratio is -0.47. In terms of profitability, FAC's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ZOOZ's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, FAC is more volatile compared to ZOOZ. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAC.Check ZOOZ's competition here
Orion Energy Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: OESX)
FAC vs OESX Comparison July 2026
Factorial Energy Inc. (NASDAQ: FAC) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAC stands at 141M. In comparison, OESX has a market cap of 34.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FAC is priced at $5.11 on the NASDAQ, while OESX trades at $10.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAC currently has a P/E ratio of -85.17, whereas OESX's P/E ratio is -11.01. In terms of profitability, FAC's ROE is -0.02%, compared to OESX's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FAC is more volatile compared to OESX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAC.Check OESX's competition here
Pioneer Pow (NASDAQ: PPSI)
FAC vs PPSI Comparison July 2026
Factorial Energy Inc. (NASDAQ: FAC) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAC stands at 141M. In comparison, PPSI has a market cap of 33.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FAC is priced at $5.11 on the NASDAQ, while PPSI trades at $2.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAC currently has a P/E ratio of -85.17, whereas PPSI's P/E ratio is -4.81. In terms of profitability, FAC's ROE is -0.02%, compared to PPSI's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FAC is more volatile compared to PPSI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAC.Check PPSI's competition here
Asia Pacific Wire & Cable Corporation Limited (NASDAQ: APWC)
FAC vs APWC Comparison July 2026
Factorial Energy Inc. (NASDAQ: FAC) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAC stands at 141M. In comparison, APWC has a market cap of 32.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FAC is priced at $5.11 on the NASDAQ, while APWC trades at $1.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAC currently has a P/E ratio of -85.17, whereas APWC's P/E ratio is 4.49. In terms of profitability, FAC's ROE is -0.02%, compared to APWC's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FAC is more volatile compared to APWC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAC.Check APWC's competition here
374Water Inc. (NASDAQ: SCWO)
FAC vs SCWO Comparison July 2026
Factorial Energy Inc. (NASDAQ: FAC) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAC stands at 141M. In comparison, SCWO has a market cap of 31.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FAC is priced at $5.11 on the NASDAQ, while SCWO trades at $2.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAC currently has a P/E ratio of -85.17, whereas SCWO's P/E ratio is -2.43. In terms of profitability, FAC's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SCWO's ROE of -3.39%. Regarding short-term risk, FAC is more volatile compared to SCWO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAC.Check SCWO's competition here
Ocean Power Technologies, Inc. (AMEX: OPTT)
FAC vs OPTT Comparison July 2026
Factorial Energy Inc. (NASDAQ: FAC) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAC stands at 141M. In comparison, OPTT has a market cap of 27.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FAC is priced at $5.11 on the NASDAQ, while OPTT trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAC currently has a P/E ratio of -85.17, whereas OPTT's P/E ratio is -0.80. In terms of profitability, FAC's ROE is -0.02%, compared to OPTT's ROE of -1.86%. Regarding short-term risk, FAC is less volatile compared to OPTT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAC.Check OPTT's competition here
Dragonfly Energy Holdings Corp. (NASDAQ: DFLI)
FAC vs DFLI Comparison July 2026
Factorial Energy Inc. (NASDAQ: FAC) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAC stands at 141M. In comparison, DFLI has a market cap of 18.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FAC is priced at $5.11 on the NASDAQ, while DFLI trades at $1.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAC currently has a P/E ratio of -85.17, whereas DFLI's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, FAC's ROE is -0.02%, compared to DFLI's ROE of +12.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FAC is more volatile compared to DFLI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAC.Check DFLI's competition here
Dragonfly Energy Holdings Corp. (NASDAQ: DFLIW)
FAC vs DFLIW Comparison July 2026
Factorial Energy Inc. (NASDAQ: FAC) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAC stands at 141M. In comparison, DFLIW has a market cap of 17.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FAC is priced at $5.11 on the NASDAQ, while DFLIW trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAC currently has a P/E ratio of -85.17, whereas DFLIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FAC's ROE is -0.02%, compared to DFLIW's ROE of +12.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FAC is less volatile compared to DFLIW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAC.Check DFLIW's competition here
Heramba Electric plc (NASDAQ: PITA)
FAC vs PITA Comparison July 2026
Factorial Energy Inc. (NASDAQ: FAC) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAC stands at 141M. In comparison, PITA has a market cap of 11.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FAC is priced at $5.11 on the NASDAQ, while PITA trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAC currently has a P/E ratio of -85.17, whereas PITA's P/E ratio is -2.92. In terms of profitability, FAC's ROE is -0.02%, compared to PITA's ROE of +2.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FAC is more volatile compared to PITA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAC.Check PITA's competition here
Flux Power Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLUX)
FAC vs FLUX Comparison July 2026
Factorial Energy Inc. (NASDAQ: FAC) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAC stands at 141M. In comparison, FLUX has a market cap of 10.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FAC is priced at $5.11 on the NASDAQ, while FLUX trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAC currently has a P/E ratio of -85.17, whereas FLUX's P/E ratio is -1.91. In terms of profitability, FAC's ROE is -0.02%, compared to FLUX's ROE of -7.38%. Regarding short-term risk, FAC is more volatile compared to FLUX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAC.Check FLUX's competition here
ESS Tech, Inc. (NYSE: GWH)
FAC vs GWH Comparison July 2026
Factorial Energy Inc. (NASDAQ: FAC) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAC stands at 141M. In comparison, GWH has a market cap of 9.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FAC is priced at $5.11 on the NASDAQ, while GWH trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAC currently has a P/E ratio of -85.17, whereas GWH's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, FAC's ROE is -0.02%, compared to GWH's ROE of -12.52%. Regarding short-term risk, FAC is more volatile compared to GWH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAC.Check GWH's competition here
Nxu, Inc. (NASDAQ: NXU)
FAC vs NXU Comparison July 2026
Factorial Energy Inc. (NASDAQ: FAC) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAC stands at 141M. In comparison, NXU has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FAC is priced at $5.11 on the NASDAQ, while NXU trades at $2.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAC currently has a P/E ratio of -85.17, whereas NXU's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, FAC's ROE is -0.02%, compared to NXU's ROE of -1.71%. Regarding short-term risk, FAC is more volatile compared to NXU. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAC.Check NXU's competition here
Green Circle Decarbonize Technology Ltd. (AMEX: GCDT)
FAC vs GCDT Comparison July 2026
Factorial Energy Inc. (NASDAQ: FAC) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAC stands at 141M. In comparison, GCDT has a market cap of 4.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FAC is priced at $5.11 on the NASDAQ, while GCDT trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAC currently has a P/E ratio of -85.17, whereas GCDT's P/E ratio is -7.64. In terms of profitability, FAC's ROE is -0.02%, compared to GCDT's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FAC is more volatile compared to GCDT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAC.Check GCDT's competition here
Polar Power, Inc. (NASDAQ: POLA)
FAC vs POLA Comparison July 2026
Factorial Energy Inc. (NASDAQ: FAC) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAC stands at 141M. In comparison, POLA has a market cap of 4M. Regarding current trading prices, FAC is priced at $5.11 on the NASDAQ, while POLA trades at $1.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAC currently has a P/E ratio of -85.17, whereas POLA's P/E ratio is -0.46. In terms of profitability, FAC's ROE is -0.02%, compared to POLA's ROE of -2.61%. Regarding short-term risk, FAC is more volatile compared to POLA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAC.Check POLA's competition here
ESS Tech, Inc. WT (NYSE: GWH-WT)
FAC vs GWH-WT Comparison July 2026
Factorial Energy Inc. (NASDAQ: FAC) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAC stands at 141M. In comparison, GWH-WT has a market cap of 3.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FAC is priced at $5.11 on the NASDAQ, while GWH-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAC currently has a P/E ratio of -85.17, whereas GWH-WT's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FAC's ROE is -0.02%, compared to GWH-WT's ROE of -12.52%. Regarding short-term risk, FAC is more volatile compared to GWH-WT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAC.Check GWH-WT's competition here
Expion360 Inc. (NASDAQ: XPON)
FAC vs XPON Comparison July 2026
Factorial Energy Inc. (NASDAQ: FAC) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAC stands at 141M. In comparison, XPON has a market cap of 3.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FAC is priced at $5.11 on the NASDAQ, while XPON trades at $3.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAC currently has a P/E ratio of -85.17, whereas XPON's P/E ratio is -2.88. In terms of profitability, FAC's ROE is -0.02%, compared to XPON's ROE of -1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FAC is more volatile compared to XPON. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAC.Check XPON's competition here
Eos Energy Enterprises Inc. Rt (NASDAQ: EOSER)
FAC vs EOSER Comparison July 2026
Factorial Energy Inc. (NASDAQ: FAC) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAC stands at 141M. In comparison, EOSER has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FAC is priced at $5.11 on the NASDAQ, while EOSER trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAC currently has a P/E ratio of -85.17, whereas EOSER's P/E ratio is 0.05. In terms of profitability, FAC's ROE is -0.02%, compared to EOSER's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FAC is less volatile compared to EOSER. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAC.Check EOSER's competition here
CCSC Technology International Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: CCTG)
FAC vs CCTG Comparison July 2026
Factorial Energy Inc. (NASDAQ: FAC) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAC stands at 141M. In comparison, CCTG has a market cap of 913.1K. Regarding current trading prices, FAC is priced at $5.11 on the NASDAQ, while CCTG trades at $0.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAC currently has a P/E ratio of -85.17, whereas CCTG's P/E ratio is -0.58. In terms of profitability, FAC's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CCTG's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FAC is more volatile compared to CCTG. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAC.Check CCTG's competition here
ZOOZ Strategy Ltd. (NASDAQ: ZOOZW)
FAC vs ZOOZW Comparison July 2026
Factorial Energy Inc. (NASDAQ: FAC) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAC stands at 141M. In comparison, ZOOZW has a market cap of 281.6K. Regarding current trading prices, FAC is priced at $5.11 on the NASDAQ, while ZOOZW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAC currently has a P/E ratio of -85.17, whereas ZOOZW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FAC's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ZOOZW's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, FAC is more volatile compared to ZOOZW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAC.Check ZOOZW's competition here
Elong Power Holding Limited (NASDAQ: ELPW)
FAC vs ELPW Comparison July 2026
Factorial Energy Inc. (NASDAQ: FAC) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAC stands at 141M. In comparison, ELPW has a market cap of 276.6K. Regarding current trading prices, FAC is priced at $5.11 on the NASDAQ, while ELPW trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAC currently has a P/E ratio of -85.17, whereas ELPW's P/E ratio is -0.26. In terms of profitability, FAC's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ELPW's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, FAC is less volatile compared to ELPW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAC.Check ELPW's competition here
Erayak Power Solution Group Inc. (NASDAQ: RAYA)
FAC vs RAYA Comparison July 2026
Factorial Energy Inc. (NASDAQ: FAC) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAC stands at 141M. In comparison, RAYA has a market cap of 261.8K. Regarding current trading prices, FAC is priced at $5.11 on the NASDAQ, while RAYA trades at $2.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAC currently has a P/E ratio of -85.17, whereas RAYA's P/E ratio is -0.27. In terms of profitability, FAC's ROE is -0.02%, compared to RAYA's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FAC is more volatile compared to RAYA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAC.Check RAYA's competition here
Tritium DCFC Limited (NASDAQ: DCFCW)
FAC vs DCFCW Comparison July 2026
Factorial Energy Inc. (NASDAQ: FAC) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAC stands at 141M. In comparison, DCFCW has a market cap of 11.2K. Regarding current trading prices, FAC is priced at $5.11 on the NASDAQ, while DCFCW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAC currently has a P/E ratio of -85.17, whereas DCFCW's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, FAC's ROE is -0.02%, compared to DCFCW's ROE of +1.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FAC is more volatile compared to DCFCW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAC.Check DCFCW's competition here
Tritium DCFC Limited (NASDAQ: DCFC)
FAC vs DCFC Comparison July 2026
Factorial Energy Inc. (NASDAQ: FAC) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAC stands at 141M. In comparison, DCFC has a market cap of 9.1K. Regarding current trading prices, FAC is priced at $5.11 on the NASDAQ, while DCFC trades at $3.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAC currently has a P/E ratio of -85.17, whereas DCFC's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, FAC's ROE is -0.02%, compared to DCFC's ROE of +1.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FAC is more volatile compared to DCFC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAC.Check DCFC's competition here
Air Methods Corp. (NASDAQ: AIRM)
FAC vs AIRM Comparison July 2026
Factorial Energy Inc. (NASDAQ: FAC) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAC stands at 141M. In comparison, AIRM has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FAC is priced at $5.11 on the NASDAQ, while AIRM trades at $42.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAC currently has a P/E ratio of -85.17, whereas AIRM's P/E ratio is 15.62. In terms of profitability, FAC's ROE is -0.02%, compared to AIRM's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FAC is more volatile compared to AIRM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAC.Check AIRM's competition here
Juno Lighting, Inc. (NASDAQ: JUNO)
FAC vs JUNO Comparison July 2026
Factorial Energy Inc. (NASDAQ: FAC) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAC stands at 141M. In comparison, JUNO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FAC is priced at $5.11 on the NASDAQ, while JUNO trades at $86.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAC currently has a P/E ratio of -85.17, whereas JUNO's P/E ratio is -20.89. In terms of profitability, FAC's ROE is -0.02%, compared to JUNO's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, FAC is more volatile compared to JUNO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAC.Check JUNO's competition here
Energizer Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: ENR-PA)
FAC vs ENR-PA Comparison July 2026
Factorial Energy Inc. (NASDAQ: FAC) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAC stands at 141M. In comparison, ENR-PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FAC is priced at $5.11 on the NASDAQ, while ENR-PA trades at $89.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAC currently has a P/E ratio of -85.17, whereas ENR-PA's P/E ratio is 42.39. In terms of profitability, FAC's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ENR-PA's ROE of +1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FAC is more volatile compared to ENR-PA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAC.Check ENR-PA's competition here
Ocean Power Technologies, Inc. (AMEX: OCESP)
FAC vs OCESP Comparison July 2026
Factorial Energy Inc. (NASDAQ: FAC) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAC stands at 141M. In comparison, OCESP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FAC is priced at $5.11 on the NASDAQ, while OCESP trades at $16.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAC currently has a P/E ratio of -85.17, whereas OCESP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FAC's ROE is -0.02%, compared to OCESP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FAC is more volatile compared to OCESP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAC.Check OCESP's competition here
Blink Charging Co (NASDAQ: BLNKW)
FAC vs BLNKW Comparison July 2026
Factorial Energy Inc. (NASDAQ: FAC) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAC stands at 141M. In comparison, BLNKW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FAC is priced at $5.11 on the NASDAQ, while BLNKW trades at $10.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAC currently has a P/E ratio of -85.17, whereas BLNKW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FAC's ROE is -0.02%, compared to BLNKW's ROE of -1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FAC is less volatile compared to BLNKW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAC.Check BLNKW's competition here