CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: CBAT) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See CBAT's competitors and their performance on the NASDAQ and across the wider stock market.
Peer Comparison Table: Electrical Equipment & Parts Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more for CBAT and its NASDAQ peers.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CBAT | $0.72 | -2.19% | 64.6M | -4.05 | -$0.18 | N/A |
| ETN | $451.51 | -0.40% | 175.3B | 37.13 | $12.16 | +0.96% |
| VRT | $293.84 | +2.36% | 113.1B | 62.26 | $4.72 | +0.08% |
| ABB | $37.13 | -1.14% | 69B | 23.65 | $1.57 | N/A |
| BE | $229.94 | -2.66% | 67.7B | 201.68 | $1.14 | N/A |
| AME | $254.79 | -0.56% | 58.4B | 31.98 | $7.96 | +0.51% |
| NVT | $171.39 | +0.81% | 27.7B | 45.61 | $3.76 | +0.48% |
| HUBB | $511.39 | +0.85% | 27B | 27.26 | $18.76 | +1.09% |
| AYI | $358.43 | -0.37% | 10.7B | 18.53 | $19.34 | +0.21% |
| FPS | $39.66 | +5.59% | 10.3B | 120.17 | $0.33 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
Eaton Corporation plc (NYSE: ETN)
CBAT vs ETN Comparison August 2026
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: CBAT) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAT stands at 64.6M. In comparison, ETN has a market cap of 175.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CBAT is priced at $0.72 on the NASDAQ, while ETN trades at $451.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.05, whereas ETN's P/E ratio is 37.13. In terms of profitability, CBAT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to ETN's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAT is more volatile compared to ETN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAT.Check ETN's competition here
Vertiv Holdings Co (NYSE: VRT)
CBAT vs VRT Comparison August 2026
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: CBAT) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAT stands at 64.6M. In comparison, VRT has a market cap of 113.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CBAT is priced at $0.72 on the NASDAQ, while VRT trades at $293.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.05, whereas VRT's P/E ratio is 62.26. In terms of profitability, CBAT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to VRT's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAT is more volatile compared to VRT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAT.Check VRT's competition here
ABB Ltd (NYSE: ABB)
CBAT vs ABB Comparison August 2026
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: CBAT) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAT stands at 64.6M. In comparison, ABB has a market cap of 69B. Regarding current trading prices, CBAT is priced at $0.72 on the NASDAQ, while ABB trades at $37.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.05, whereas ABB's P/E ratio is 23.65. In terms of profitability, CBAT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to ABB's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAT is more volatile compared to ABB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAT.Check ABB's competition here
Bloom Energy Corporation (NYSE: BE)
CBAT vs BE Comparison August 2026
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: CBAT) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAT stands at 64.6M. In comparison, BE has a market cap of 67.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CBAT is priced at $0.72 on the NASDAQ, while BE trades at $229.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.05, whereas BE's P/E ratio is 201.68. In terms of profitability, CBAT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to BE's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAT is less volatile compared to BE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAT.Check BE's competition here
AMETEK, Inc. (NYSE: AME)
CBAT vs AME Comparison August 2026
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: CBAT) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAT stands at 64.6M. In comparison, AME has a market cap of 58.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CBAT is priced at $0.72 on the NASDAQ, while AME trades at $254.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.05, whereas AME's P/E ratio is 31.98. In terms of profitability, CBAT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to AME's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAT is more volatile compared to AME. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAT.Check AME's competition here
nVent Electric plc (NYSE: NVT)
CBAT vs NVT Comparison August 2026
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: CBAT) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAT stands at 64.6M. In comparison, NVT has a market cap of 27.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CBAT is priced at $0.72 on the NASDAQ, while NVT trades at $171.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.05, whereas NVT's P/E ratio is 45.61. In terms of profitability, CBAT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to NVT's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAT is more volatile compared to NVT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAT.Check NVT's competition here
Hubbell Incorporated (NYSE: HUBB)
CBAT vs HUBB Comparison August 2026
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: CBAT) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAT stands at 64.6M. In comparison, HUBB has a market cap of 27B. Regarding current trading prices, CBAT is priced at $0.72 on the NASDAQ, while HUBB trades at $511.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.05, whereas HUBB's P/E ratio is 27.26. In terms of profitability, CBAT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to HUBB's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAT is more volatile compared to HUBB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAT.Check HUBB's competition here
Acuity Brands, Inc. (NYSE: AYI)
CBAT vs AYI Comparison August 2026
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: CBAT) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAT stands at 64.6M. In comparison, AYI has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CBAT is priced at $0.72 on the NASDAQ, while AYI trades at $358.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.05, whereas AYI's P/E ratio is 18.53. In terms of profitability, CBAT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to AYI's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAT is more volatile compared to AYI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAT.Check AYI's competition here
Forgent Power Solutions, Inc. (NYSE: FPS)
CBAT vs FPS Comparison August 2026
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: CBAT) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAT stands at 64.6M. In comparison, FPS has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CBAT is priced at $0.72 on the NASDAQ, while FPS trades at $39.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.05, whereas FPS's P/E ratio is 120.17. In terms of profitability, CBAT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to FPS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAT is more volatile compared to FPS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAT.Check FPS's competition here
Powell Industries, Inc. (NASDAQ: POWL)
CBAT vs POWL Comparison August 2026
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: CBAT) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAT stands at 64.6M. In comparison, POWL has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CBAT is priced at $0.72 on the NASDAQ, while POWL trades at $213.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.05, whereas POWL's P/E ratio is 26.62. In terms of profitability, CBAT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to POWL's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAT is less volatile compared to POWL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAT.Check POWL's competition here
EnerSys (NYSE: ENS)
CBAT vs ENS Comparison August 2026
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: CBAT) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAT stands at 64.6M. In comparison, ENS has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CBAT is priced at $0.72 on the NASDAQ, while ENS trades at $203.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.05, whereas ENS's P/E ratio is 19.21. In terms of profitability, CBAT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to ENS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAT is less volatile compared to ENS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAT.Check ENS's competition here
Encore Wire Corporation (NASDAQ: WIRE)
CBAT vs WIRE Comparison August 2026
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: CBAT) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAT stands at 64.6M. In comparison, WIRE has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CBAT is priced at $0.72 on the NASDAQ, while WIRE trades at $289.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.05, whereas WIRE's P/E ratio is 15.22. In terms of profitability, CBAT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to WIRE's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAT is more volatile compared to WIRE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAT.Check WIRE's competition here
ERock, Inc. (NYSE: EROC)
CBAT vs EROC Comparison August 2026
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: CBAT) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAT stands at 64.6M. In comparison, EROC has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CBAT is priced at $0.72 on the NASDAQ, while EROC trades at $16.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.05, whereas EROC's P/E ratio is -556.67. In terms of profitability, CBAT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to EROC's ROE of +5.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAT is less volatile compared to EROC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAT.Check EROC's competition here
Versigent PLC (NYSE: VGNT)
CBAT vs VGNT Comparison August 2026
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: CBAT) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAT stands at 64.6M. In comparison, VGNT has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CBAT is priced at $0.72 on the NASDAQ, while VGNT trades at $46.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.05, whereas VGNT's P/E ratio is 6.84. In terms of profitability, CBAT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to VGNT's ROE of +0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAT is more volatile compared to VGNT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAT.Check VGNT's competition here
Plug Power Inc. (NASDAQ: PLUG)
CBAT vs PLUG Comparison August 2026
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: CBAT) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAT stands at 64.6M. In comparison, PLUG has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CBAT is priced at $0.72 on the NASDAQ, while PLUG trades at $2.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.05, whereas PLUG's P/E ratio is -4.46. In terms of profitability, CBAT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to PLUG's ROE of -1.76%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAT is more volatile compared to PLUG. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAT.Check PLUG's competition here
Hayward Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: HAYW)
CBAT vs HAYW Comparison August 2026
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: CBAT) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAT stands at 64.6M. In comparison, HAYW has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CBAT is priced at $0.72 on the NASDAQ, while HAYW trades at $15.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.05, whereas HAYW's P/E ratio is 18.96. In terms of profitability, CBAT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to HAYW's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAT is more volatile compared to HAYW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAT.Check HAYW's competition here
Atkore Inc. (NYSE: ATKR)
CBAT vs ATKR Comparison August 2026
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: CBAT) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAT stands at 64.6M. In comparison, ATKR has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CBAT is priced at $0.72 on the NASDAQ, while ATKR trades at $93.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.05, whereas ATKR's P/E ratio is 20.09. In terms of profitability, CBAT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to ATKR's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAT is more volatile compared to ATKR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAT.Check ATKR's competition here
Preformed Line Products Company (NASDAQ: PLPC)
CBAT vs PLPC Comparison August 2026
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: CBAT) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAT stands at 64.6M. In comparison, PLPC has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CBAT is priced at $0.72 on the NASDAQ, while PLPC trades at $464.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.05, whereas PLPC's P/E ratio is 54.60. In terms of profitability, CBAT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to PLPC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAT is more volatile compared to PLPC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAT.Check PLPC's competition here
Thermon Group Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: THR)
CBAT vs THR Comparison August 2026
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: CBAT) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAT stands at 64.6M. In comparison, THR has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, CBAT is priced at $0.72 on the NASDAQ, while THR trades at $61.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.05, whereas THR's P/E ratio is 44.96. In terms of profitability, CBAT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to THR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAT is more volatile compared to THR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAT.Check THR's competition here
Allient Inc. (NASDAQ: ALNT)
CBAT vs ALNT Comparison August 2026
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: CBAT) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAT stands at 64.6M. In comparison, ALNT has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CBAT is priced at $0.72 on the NASDAQ, while ALNT trades at $111.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.05, whereas ALNT's P/E ratio is 45.66. In terms of profitability, CBAT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to ALNT's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAT is less volatile compared to ALNT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAT.Check ALNT's competition here
Amprius Technologies, Inc. (NYSE: AMPX-WT)
CBAT vs AMPX-WT Comparison August 2026
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: CBAT) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAT stands at 64.6M. In comparison, AMPX-WT has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CBAT is priced at $0.72 on the NASDAQ, while AMPX-WT trades at $5.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.05, whereas AMPX-WT's P/E ratio is -17.44. In terms of profitability, CBAT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to AMPX-WT's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAT is less volatile compared to AMPX-WT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAT.Check AMPX-WT's competition here
FuelCell Energy, Inc. (NASDAQ: FCEL)
CBAT vs FCEL Comparison August 2026
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: CBAT) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAT stands at 64.6M. In comparison, FCEL has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CBAT is priced at $0.72 on the NASDAQ, while FCEL trades at $22.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.05, whereas FCEL's P/E ratio is -5.97. In terms of profitability, CBAT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to FCEL's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAT is less volatile compared to FCEL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAT.Check FCEL's competition here
Amprius Technologies, Inc. (NYSE: AMPX)
CBAT vs AMPX Comparison August 2026
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: CBAT) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAT stands at 64.6M. In comparison, AMPX has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CBAT is priced at $0.72 on the NASDAQ, while AMPX trades at $12.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.05, whereas AMPX's P/E ratio is -113.68. In terms of profitability, CBAT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to AMPX's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAT is less volatile compared to AMPX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAT.Check AMPX's competition here
Hollysys Automation Technologies Ltd. (NASDAQ: HOLI)
CBAT vs HOLI Comparison August 2026
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: CBAT) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAT stands at 64.6M. In comparison, HOLI has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CBAT is priced at $0.72 on the NASDAQ, while HOLI trades at $26.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.05, whereas HOLI's P/E ratio is 21.83. In terms of profitability, CBAT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to HOLI's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAT is more volatile compared to HOLI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAT.Check HOLI's competition here
Energizer Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: ENR)
CBAT vs ENR Comparison August 2026
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: CBAT) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAT stands at 64.6M. In comparison, ENR has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CBAT is priced at $0.72 on the NASDAQ, while ENR trades at $22.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.05, whereas ENR's P/E ratio is 7.46. In terms of profitability, CBAT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to ENR's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAT is more volatile compared to ENR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAT.Check ENR's competition here
T1 Energy Inc. WT (NYSE: TE-WT)
CBAT vs TE-WT Comparison August 2026
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: CBAT) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAT stands at 64.6M. In comparison, TE-WT has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CBAT is priced at $0.72 on the NASDAQ, while TE-WT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.05, whereas TE-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CBAT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to TE-WT's ROE of -1.44%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAT is less volatile compared to TE-WT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAT.Check TE-WT's competition here
American Superconductor Corporation (NASDAQ: AMSC)
CBAT vs AMSC Comparison August 2026
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: CBAT) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAT stands at 64.6M. In comparison, AMSC has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CBAT is priced at $0.72 on the NASDAQ, while AMSC trades at $31.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.05, whereas AMSC's P/E ratio is 9.36. In terms of profitability, CBAT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to AMSC's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAT is more volatile compared to AMSC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAT.Check AMSC's competition here
T1 Energy Inc (NYSE: TE)
CBAT vs TE Comparison August 2026
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: CBAT) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAT stands at 64.6M. In comparison, TE has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CBAT is priced at $0.72 on the NASDAQ, while TE trades at $5.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.05, whereas TE's P/E ratio is -2.93. In terms of profitability, CBAT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to TE's ROE of -1.44%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAT is less volatile compared to TE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAT.Check TE's competition here
Eos Energy Enterprises, Inc. (NASDAQ: EOSE)
CBAT vs EOSE Comparison August 2026
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: CBAT) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAT stands at 64.6M. In comparison, EOSE has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CBAT is priced at $0.72 on the NASDAQ, while EOSE trades at $4.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.05, whereas EOSE's P/E ratio is -0.59. In terms of profitability, CBAT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to EOSE's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAT is less volatile compared to EOSE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAT.Check EOSE's competition here
Nano Nuclear Energy Inc. (NASDAQ: NNE)
CBAT vs NNE Comparison August 2026
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: CBAT) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAT stands at 64.6M. In comparison, NNE has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CBAT is priced at $0.72 on the NASDAQ, while NNE trades at $19.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.05, whereas NNE's P/E ratio is -28.49. In terms of profitability, CBAT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to NNE's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAT is less volatile compared to NNE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAT.Check NNE's competition here
Enovix Corporation (NASDAQ: ENVX)
CBAT vs ENVX Comparison August 2026
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: CBAT) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAT stands at 64.6M. In comparison, ENVX has a market cap of 957.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CBAT is priced at $0.72 on the NASDAQ, while ENVX trades at $4.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.05, whereas ENVX's P/E ratio is -7.98. In terms of profitability, CBAT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to ENVX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAT is less volatile compared to ENVX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAT.Check ENVX's competition here
Eos Energy Enterprises, Inc. (NASDAQ: EOSEW)
CBAT vs EOSEW Comparison August 2026
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: CBAT) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAT stands at 64.6M. In comparison, EOSEW has a market cap of 929.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CBAT is priced at $0.72 on the NASDAQ, while EOSEW trades at $3.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.05, whereas EOSEW's P/E ratio is -0.43. In terms of profitability, CBAT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to EOSEW's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAT is less volatile compared to EOSEW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAT.Check EOSEW's competition here
LSI Industries Inc. (NASDAQ: LYTS)
CBAT vs LYTS Comparison August 2026
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: CBAT) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAT stands at 64.6M. In comparison, LYTS has a market cap of 912.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CBAT is priced at $0.72 on the NASDAQ, while LYTS trades at $24.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.05, whereas LYTS's P/E ratio is 33.15. In terms of profitability, CBAT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to LYTS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAT is more volatile compared to LYTS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAT.Check LYTS's competition here
ADS-TEC Energy PLC (NASDAQ: ADSE)
CBAT vs ADSE Comparison August 2026
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: CBAT) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAT stands at 64.6M. In comparison, ADSE has a market cap of 886.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CBAT is priced at $0.72 on the NASDAQ, while ADSE trades at $11.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.05, whereas ADSE's P/E ratio is -9.56. In terms of profitability, CBAT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to ADSE's ROE of +4.92%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAT is more volatile compared to ADSE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAT.Check ADSE's competition here
Ballard Power Systems Inc. (NASDAQ: BLDP)
CBAT vs BLDP Comparison August 2026
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: CBAT) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAT stands at 64.6M. In comparison, BLDP has a market cap of 814M. Regarding current trading prices, CBAT is priced at $0.72 on the NASDAQ, while BLDP trades at $2.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.05, whereas BLDP's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, CBAT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to BLDP's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAT is more volatile compared to BLDP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAT.Check BLDP's competition here
ADS-TEC Energy PLC (NASDAQ: ADSEW)
CBAT vs ADSEW Comparison August 2026
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: CBAT) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAT stands at 64.6M. In comparison, ADSEW has a market cap of 771.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CBAT is priced at $0.72 on the NASDAQ, while ADSEW trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.05, whereas ADSEW's P/E ratio is -0.46. In terms of profitability, CBAT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to ADSEW's ROE of +4.92%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAT is more volatile compared to ADSEW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAT.Check ADSEW's competition here
Solid Power, Inc. (NASDAQ: SLDPW)
CBAT vs SLDPW Comparison August 2026
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: CBAT) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAT stands at 64.6M. In comparison, SLDPW has a market cap of 712.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CBAT is priced at $0.72 on the NASDAQ, while SLDPW trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.05, whereas SLDPW's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, CBAT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to SLDPW's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAT is less volatile compared to SLDPW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAT.Check SLDPW's competition here
Energy Vault Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: NRGV)
CBAT vs NRGV Comparison August 2026
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: CBAT) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAT stands at 64.6M. In comparison, NRGV has a market cap of 685.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CBAT is priced at $0.72 on the NASDAQ, while NRGV trades at $3.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.05, whereas NRGV's P/E ratio is -5.32. In terms of profitability, CBAT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to NRGV's ROE of -2.37%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAT is more volatile compared to NRGV. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAT.Check NRGV's competition here
Kimball Electronics, Inc. (NASDAQ: KE)
CBAT vs KE Comparison August 2026
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: CBAT) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAT stands at 64.6M. In comparison, KE has a market cap of 621.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CBAT is priced at $0.72 on the NASDAQ, while KE trades at $25.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.05, whereas KE's P/E ratio is 17.95. In terms of profitability, CBAT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to KE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAT is more volatile compared to KE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAT.Check KE's competition here
AirJoule Technologies Corporation (NASDAQ: AIRJW)
CBAT vs AIRJW Comparison August 2026
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: CBAT) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAT stands at 64.6M. In comparison, AIRJW has a market cap of 437.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CBAT is priced at $0.72 on the NASDAQ, while AIRJW trades at $1.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.05, whereas AIRJW's P/E ratio is -1.30. In terms of profitability, CBAT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to AIRJW's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAT is less volatile compared to AIRJW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAT.Check AIRJW's competition here
AirJoule Technologies Corporation (NASDAQ: AIRJ)
CBAT vs AIRJ Comparison August 2026
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: CBAT) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAT stands at 64.6M. In comparison, AIRJ has a market cap of 437.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CBAT is priced at $0.72 on the NASDAQ, while AIRJ trades at $6.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.05, whereas AIRJ's P/E ratio is -26.26. In terms of profitability, CBAT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to AIRJ's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAT is less volatile compared to AIRJ. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAT.Check AIRJ's competition here
Electrovaya Inc. (NASDAQ: ELVA)
CBAT vs ELVA Comparison August 2026
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: CBAT) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAT stands at 64.6M. In comparison, ELVA has a market cap of 393.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CBAT is priced at $0.72 on the NASDAQ, while ELVA trades at $7.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.05, whereas ELVA's P/E ratio is 66.25. In terms of profitability, CBAT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to ELVA's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAT is less volatile compared to ELVA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAT.Check ELVA's competition here
Lightbridge Corporation (NASDAQ: LTBR)
CBAT vs LTBR Comparison August 2026
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: CBAT) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAT stands at 64.6M. In comparison, LTBR has a market cap of 297M. Regarding current trading prices, CBAT is priced at $0.72 on the NASDAQ, while LTBR trades at $8.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.05, whereas LTBR's P/E ratio is -10.70. In terms of profitability, CBAT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to LTBR's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAT is less volatile compared to LTBR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAT.Check LTBR's competition here
Microvast Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: MVST)
CBAT vs MVST Comparison August 2026
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: CBAT) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAT stands at 64.6M. In comparison, MVST has a market cap of 279.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CBAT is priced at $0.72 on the NASDAQ, while MVST trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.05, whereas MVST's P/E ratio is -13.98. In terms of profitability, CBAT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to MVST's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAT is less volatile compared to MVST. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAT.Check MVST's competition here
FREYR Battery, Inc. WT (NYSE: FREY-WT)
CBAT vs FREY-WT Comparison August 2026
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: CBAT) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAT stands at 64.6M. In comparison, FREY-WT has a market cap of 241.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CBAT is priced at $0.72 on the NASDAQ, while FREY-WT trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.05, whereas FREY-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CBAT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to FREY-WT's ROE of -2.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAT is more volatile compared to FREY-WT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAT.Check FREY-WT's competition here
FREYR Battery (NYSE: FREY)
CBAT vs FREY Comparison August 2026
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: CBAT) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAT stands at 64.6M. In comparison, FREY has a market cap of 241.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CBAT is priced at $0.72 on the NASDAQ, while FREY trades at $1.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.05, whereas FREY's P/E ratio is -13.91. In terms of profitability, CBAT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to FREY's ROE of -1.86%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAT is more volatile compared to FREY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAT.Check FREY's competition here
Capstone Energy+, Inc. (NASDAQ: CEPL)
CBAT vs CEPL Comparison August 2026
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: CBAT) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAT stands at 64.6M. In comparison, CEPL has a market cap of 215.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CBAT is priced at $0.72 on the NASDAQ, while CEPL trades at $6.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.05, whereas CEPL's P/E ratio is 111.25. In terms of profitability, CBAT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to CEPL's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAT is less volatile compared to CEPL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAT.Check CEPL's competition here
GrafTech International Ltd. (NYSE: EAF)
CBAT vs EAF Comparison August 2026
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: CBAT) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAT stands at 64.6M. In comparison, EAF has a market cap of 203.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CBAT is priced at $0.72 on the NASDAQ, while EAF trades at $7.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.05, whereas EAF's P/E ratio is -1.10. In terms of profitability, CBAT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to EAF's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAT is more volatile compared to EAF. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAT.Check EAF's competition here
NeoVolta Inc (NASDAQ: NEOV)
CBAT vs NEOV Comparison August 2026
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: CBAT) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAT stands at 64.6M. In comparison, NEOV has a market cap of 199.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CBAT is priced at $0.72 on the NASDAQ, while NEOV trades at $3.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.05, whereas NEOV's P/E ratio is -11.00. In terms of profitability, CBAT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to NEOV's ROE of -1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAT is less volatile compared to NEOV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAT.Check NEOV's competition here
Espey Mfg. & Electronics Corp. (AMEX: ESP)
CBAT vs ESP Comparison August 2026
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: CBAT) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAT stands at 64.6M. In comparison, ESP has a market cap of 192.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CBAT is priced at $0.72 on the NASDAQ, while ESP trades at $64.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.05, whereas ESP's P/E ratio is 16.94. In terms of profitability, CBAT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to ESP's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAT is more volatile compared to ESP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAT.Check ESP's competition here
Enovix Corporation (NASDAQ: ENVXW)
CBAT vs ENVXW Comparison August 2026
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: CBAT) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAT stands at 64.6M. In comparison, ENVXW has a market cap of 158.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CBAT is priced at $0.72 on the NASDAQ, while ENVXW trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.05, whereas ENVXW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CBAT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to ENVXW's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAT is less volatile compared to ENVXW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAT.Check ENVXW's competition here
SKYX Platforms Corp. (NASDAQ: SKYX)
CBAT vs SKYX Comparison August 2026
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: CBAT) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAT stands at 64.6M. In comparison, SKYX has a market cap of 150.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CBAT is priced at $0.72 on the NASDAQ, while SKYX trades at $1.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.05, whereas SKYX's P/E ratio is -3.86. In terms of profitability, CBAT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to SKYX's ROE of -3.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAT is less volatile compared to SKYX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAT.Check SKYX's competition here
RF Industries, Ltd. (NASDAQ: RFIL)
CBAT vs RFIL Comparison August 2026
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: CBAT) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAT stands at 64.6M. In comparison, RFIL has a market cap of 147.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CBAT is priced at $0.72 on the NASDAQ, while RFIL trades at $13.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.05, whereas RFIL's P/E ratio is 27.22. In terms of profitability, CBAT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to RFIL's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAT is more volatile compared to RFIL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAT.Check RFIL's competition here
Factorial Energy Inc. (NASDAQ: FAC)
CBAT vs FAC Comparison August 2026
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: CBAT) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAT stands at 64.6M. In comparison, FAC has a market cap of 142.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CBAT is priced at $0.72 on the NASDAQ, while FAC trades at $5.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.05, whereas FAC's P/E ratio is -86.00. In terms of profitability, CBAT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to FAC's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAT is less volatile compared to FAC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAT.Check FAC's competition here
SES AI Corporation (NYSE: SES-WT)
CBAT vs SES-WT Comparison August 2026
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: CBAT) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAT stands at 64.6M. In comparison, SES-WT has a market cap of 139M. Regarding current trading prices, CBAT is priced at $0.72 on the NASDAQ, while SES-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.05, whereas SES-WT's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, CBAT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to SES-WT's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAT is more volatile compared to SES-WT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAT.Check SES-WT's competition here
Ultralife Corporation (NASDAQ: ULBI)
CBAT vs ULBI Comparison August 2026
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: CBAT) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAT stands at 64.6M. In comparison, ULBI has a market cap of 125.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CBAT is priced at $0.72 on the NASDAQ, while ULBI trades at $7.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.05, whereas ULBI's P/E ratio is 83.44. In terms of profitability, CBAT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to ULBI's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAT is less volatile compared to ULBI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAT.Check ULBI's competition here
Servotronics, Inc. (AMEX: SVT)
CBAT vs SVT Comparison August 2026
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: CBAT) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAT stands at 64.6M. In comparison, SVT has a market cap of 120M. Regarding current trading prices, CBAT is priced at $0.72 on the NASDAQ, while SVT trades at $46.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.05, whereas SVT's P/E ratio is -120.36. In terms of profitability, CBAT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to SVT's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAT is more volatile compared to SVT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAT.Check SVT's competition here
Tecogen Inc. (AMEX: TGEN)
CBAT vs TGEN Comparison August 2026
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: CBAT) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAT stands at 64.6M. In comparison, TGEN has a market cap of 109.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CBAT is priced at $0.72 on the NASDAQ, while TGEN trades at $3.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.05, whereas TGEN's P/E ratio is -12.62. In terms of profitability, CBAT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to TGEN's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAT is less volatile compared to TGEN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAT.Check TGEN's competition here
Novonix Limited (NASDAQ: NVX)
CBAT vs NVX Comparison August 2026
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: CBAT) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAT stands at 64.6M. In comparison, NVX has a market cap of 92.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CBAT is priced at $0.72 on the NASDAQ, while NVX trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.05, whereas NVX's P/E ratio is -0.77. In terms of profitability, CBAT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to NVX's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAT is less volatile compared to NVX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAT.Check NVX's competition here
Orion Energy Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: OESX)
CBAT vs OESX Comparison August 2026
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: CBAT) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAT stands at 64.6M. In comparison, OESX has a market cap of 78.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CBAT is priced at $0.72 on the NASDAQ, while OESX trades at $19.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.05, whereas OESX's P/E ratio is 24.49. In terms of profitability, CBAT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to OESX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAT is more volatile compared to OESX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAT.Check OESX's competition here
CPS Technologies Corporation (NASDAQ: CPSH)
CBAT vs CPSH Comparison August 2026
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: CBAT) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAT stands at 64.6M. In comparison, CPSH has a market cap of 69.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CBAT is priced at $0.72 on the NASDAQ, while CPSH trades at $4.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.05, whereas CPSH's P/E ratio is 6157.14. In terms of profitability, CBAT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to CPSH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAT is more volatile compared to CPSH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAT.Check CPSH's competition here
Solidion Technology Inc. (NASDAQ: STI)
CBAT vs STI Comparison August 2026
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: CBAT) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAT stands at 64.6M. In comparison, STI has a market cap of 66.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CBAT is priced at $0.72 on the NASDAQ, while STI trades at $7.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.05, whereas STI's P/E ratio is -0.61. In terms of profitability, CBAT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to STI's ROE of +25.86%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAT is more volatile compared to STI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAT.Check STI's competition here
NeoVolta Inc. (NASDAQ: NEOVW)
CBAT vs NEOVW Comparison August 2026
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: CBAT) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAT stands at 64.6M. In comparison, NEOVW has a market cap of 63.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CBAT is priced at $0.72 on the NASDAQ, while NEOVW trades at $1.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.05, whereas NEOVW's P/E ratio is -7.97. In terms of profitability, CBAT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to NEOVW's ROE of -1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAT is less volatile compared to NEOVW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAT.Check NEOVW's competition here
ZOOZ Strategy Ltd. (NASDAQ: ZOOZ)
CBAT vs ZOOZ Comparison August 2026
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: CBAT) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAT stands at 64.6M. In comparison, ZOOZ has a market cap of 44.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CBAT is priced at $0.72 on the NASDAQ, while ZOOZ trades at $5.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.05, whereas ZOOZ's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, CBAT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to ZOOZ's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAT is more volatile compared to ZOOZ. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAT.Check ZOOZ's competition here
374Water Inc. (NASDAQ: SCWO)
CBAT vs SCWO Comparison August 2026
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: CBAT) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAT stands at 64.6M. In comparison, SCWO has a market cap of 43.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CBAT is priced at $0.72 on the NASDAQ, while SCWO trades at $2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.05, whereas SCWO's P/E ratio is -2.81. In terms of profitability, CBAT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to SCWO's ROE of -3.39%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAT is less volatile compared to SCWO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAT.Check SCWO's competition here
Ocean Power Technologies, Inc. (AMEX: OPTT)
CBAT vs OPTT Comparison August 2026
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: CBAT) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAT stands at 64.6M. In comparison, OPTT has a market cap of 40.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CBAT is priced at $0.72 on the NASDAQ, while OPTT trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.05, whereas OPTT's P/E ratio is -1.09. In terms of profitability, CBAT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to OPTT's ROE of -2.32%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAT is more volatile compared to OPTT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAT.Check OPTT's competition here
Pioneer Pow (NASDAQ: PPSI)
CBAT vs PPSI Comparison August 2026
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: CBAT) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAT stands at 64.6M. In comparison, PPSI has a market cap of 32.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CBAT is priced at $0.72 on the NASDAQ, while PPSI trades at $2.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.05, whereas PPSI's P/E ratio is -4.69. In terms of profitability, CBAT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to PPSI's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAT is less volatile compared to PPSI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAT.Check PPSI's competition here
Asia Pacific Wire & Cable Corporation Limited (NASDAQ: APWC)
CBAT vs APWC Comparison August 2026
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: CBAT) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAT stands at 64.6M. In comparison, APWC has a market cap of 31.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CBAT is priced at $0.72 on the NASDAQ, while APWC trades at $1.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.05, whereas APWC's P/E ratio is 4.34. In terms of profitability, CBAT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to APWC's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAT is less volatile compared to APWC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAT.Check APWC's competition here
ESS Tech, Inc. (NYSE: GWH)
CBAT vs GWH Comparison August 2026
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: CBAT) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAT stands at 64.6M. In comparison, GWH has a market cap of 18M. Regarding current trading prices, CBAT is priced at $0.72 on the NASDAQ, while GWH trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.05, whereas GWH's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, CBAT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to GWH's ROE of -19.35%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAT is less volatile compared to GWH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAT.Check GWH's competition here
Dragonfly Energy Holdings Corp. (NASDAQ: DFLI)
CBAT vs DFLI Comparison August 2026
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: CBAT) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAT stands at 64.6M. In comparison, DFLI has a market cap of 16.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CBAT is priced at $0.72 on the NASDAQ, while DFLI trades at $1.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.05, whereas DFLI's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, CBAT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to DFLI's ROE of -15.66%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAT is more volatile compared to DFLI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAT.Check DFLI's competition here
Flux Power Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLUX)
CBAT vs FLUX Comparison August 2026
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: CBAT) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAT stands at 64.6M. In comparison, FLUX has a market cap of 12.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CBAT is priced at $0.72 on the NASDAQ, while FLUX trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.05, whereas FLUX's P/E ratio is -1.92. In terms of profitability, CBAT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to FLUX's ROE of -7.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAT is less volatile compared to FLUX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAT.Check FLUX's competition here
Dragonfly Energy Holdings Corp. (NASDAQ: DFLIW)
CBAT vs DFLIW Comparison August 2026
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: CBAT) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAT stands at 64.6M. In comparison, DFLIW has a market cap of 12M. Regarding current trading prices, CBAT is priced at $0.72 on the NASDAQ, while DFLIW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.05, whereas DFLIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CBAT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to DFLIW's ROE of -15.66%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAT is more volatile compared to DFLIW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAT.Check DFLIW's competition here
Heramba Electric plc (NASDAQ: PITA)
CBAT vs PITA Comparison August 2026
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: CBAT) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAT stands at 64.6M. In comparison, PITA has a market cap of 11.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CBAT is priced at $0.72 on the NASDAQ, while PITA trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.05, whereas PITA's P/E ratio is -2.92. In terms of profitability, CBAT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to PITA's ROE of +2.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAT is more volatile compared to PITA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAT.Check PITA's competition here
Nxu, Inc. (NASDAQ: NXU)
CBAT vs NXU Comparison August 2026
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: CBAT) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAT stands at 64.6M. In comparison, NXU has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CBAT is priced at $0.72 on the NASDAQ, while NXU trades at $2.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.05, whereas NXU's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, CBAT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to NXU's ROE of -2.37%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAT is more volatile compared to NXU. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAT.Check NXU's competition here
Green Circle Decarbonize Technology Ltd. (AMEX: GCDT)
CBAT vs GCDT Comparison August 2026
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: CBAT) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAT stands at 64.6M. In comparison, GCDT has a market cap of 5M. Regarding current trading prices, CBAT is priced at $0.72 on the NASDAQ, while GCDT trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.05, whereas GCDT's P/E ratio is -8.33. In terms of profitability, CBAT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to GCDT's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAT is less volatile compared to GCDT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAT.Check GCDT's competition here
Polar Power, Inc. (NASDAQ: POLA)
CBAT vs POLA Comparison August 2026
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: CBAT) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAT stands at 64.6M. In comparison, POLA has a market cap of 5M. Regarding current trading prices, CBAT is priced at $0.72 on the NASDAQ, while POLA trades at $1.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.05, whereas POLA's P/E ratio is -0.57. In terms of profitability, CBAT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to POLA's ROE of -2.61%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAT is less volatile compared to POLA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAT.Check POLA's competition here
Expion360 Inc. (NASDAQ: XPON)
CBAT vs XPON Comparison August 2026
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: CBAT) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAT stands at 64.6M. In comparison, XPON has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CBAT is priced at $0.72 on the NASDAQ, while XPON trades at $3.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.05, whereas XPON's P/E ratio is -3.08. In terms of profitability, CBAT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to XPON's ROE of -1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAT is more volatile compared to XPON. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAT.Check XPON's competition here
ESS Tech, Inc. WT (NYSE: GWH-WT)
CBAT vs GWH-WT Comparison August 2026
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: CBAT) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAT stands at 64.6M. In comparison, GWH-WT has a market cap of 3.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CBAT is priced at $0.72 on the NASDAQ, while GWH-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.05, whereas GWH-WT's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CBAT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to GWH-WT's ROE of -19.35%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAT is more volatile compared to GWH-WT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAT.Check GWH-WT's competition here
Erayak Power Solution Group Inc. (NASDAQ: RAYA)
CBAT vs RAYA Comparison August 2026
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: CBAT) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAT stands at 64.6M. In comparison, RAYA has a market cap of 2.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CBAT is priced at $0.72 on the NASDAQ, while RAYA trades at $2.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.05, whereas RAYA's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, CBAT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to RAYA's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAT is more volatile compared to RAYA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAT.Check RAYA's competition here
Eos Energy Enterprises Inc. Rt (NASDAQ: EOSER)
CBAT vs EOSER Comparison August 2026
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: CBAT) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAT stands at 64.6M. In comparison, EOSER has a market cap of 2.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CBAT is priced at $0.72 on the NASDAQ, while EOSER trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.05, whereas EOSER's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CBAT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to EOSER's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CBAT is less volatile compared to EOSER. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAT.Check EOSER's competition here
Elong Power Holding Limited (NASDAQ: ELPW)
CBAT vs ELPW Comparison August 2026
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: CBAT) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAT stands at 64.6M. In comparison, ELPW has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, CBAT is priced at $0.72 on the NASDAQ, while ELPW trades at $4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.05, whereas ELPW's P/E ratio is -5.37. In terms of profitability, CBAT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to ELPW's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAT is less volatile compared to ELPW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAT.Check ELPW's competition here
CCSC Technology International Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: CCTG)
CBAT vs CCTG Comparison August 2026
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: CBAT) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAT stands at 64.6M. In comparison, CCTG has a market cap of 860.3K. Regarding current trading prices, CBAT is priced at $0.72 on the NASDAQ, while CCTG trades at $0.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.05, whereas CCTG's P/E ratio is -0.54. In terms of profitability, CBAT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to CCTG's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAT is less volatile compared to CCTG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAT.Check CCTG's competition here
Nuvve Holding Corp. (NASDAQ: NVVE)
CBAT vs NVVE Comparison August 2026
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: CBAT) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAT stands at 64.6M. In comparison, NVVE has a market cap of 624.4K. Regarding current trading prices, CBAT is priced at $0.72 on the NASDAQ, while NVVE trades at $1.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.05, whereas NVVE's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, CBAT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to NVVE's ROE of +19.34%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAT is less volatile compared to NVVE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAT.Check NVVE's competition here
ZOOZ Strategy Ltd. (NASDAQ: ZOOZW)
CBAT vs ZOOZW Comparison August 2026
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: CBAT) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAT stands at 64.6M. In comparison, ZOOZW has a market cap of 264.6K. Regarding current trading prices, CBAT is priced at $0.72 on the NASDAQ, while ZOOZW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.05, whereas ZOOZW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CBAT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to ZOOZW's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAT is more volatile compared to ZOOZW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAT.Check ZOOZW's competition here
Microvast Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: MVSTW)
CBAT vs MVSTW Comparison August 2026
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: CBAT) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAT stands at 64.6M. In comparison, MVSTW has a market cap of 98.1K. Regarding current trading prices, CBAT is priced at $0.72 on the NASDAQ, while MVSTW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.05, whereas MVSTW's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, CBAT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to MVSTW's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAT is more volatile compared to MVSTW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAT.Check MVSTW's competition here
Tritium DCFC Limited (NASDAQ: DCFCW)
CBAT vs DCFCW Comparison August 2026
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: CBAT) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAT stands at 64.6M. In comparison, DCFCW has a market cap of 11.2K. Regarding current trading prices, CBAT is priced at $0.72 on the NASDAQ, while DCFCW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.05, whereas DCFCW's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, CBAT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to DCFCW's ROE of +1.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAT is less volatile compared to DCFCW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAT.Check DCFCW's competition here
Tritium DCFC Limited (NASDAQ: DCFC)
CBAT vs DCFC Comparison August 2026
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: CBAT) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAT stands at 64.6M. In comparison, DCFC has a market cap of 9.1K. Regarding current trading prices, CBAT is priced at $0.72 on the NASDAQ, while DCFC trades at $3.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.05, whereas DCFC's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, CBAT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to DCFC's ROE of +1.32%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAT is more volatile compared to DCFC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAT.Check DCFC's competition here
Air Methods Corp. (NASDAQ: AIRM)
CBAT vs AIRM Comparison August 2026
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: CBAT) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAT stands at 64.6M. In comparison, AIRM has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CBAT is priced at $0.72 on the NASDAQ, while AIRM trades at $42.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.05, whereas AIRM's P/E ratio is 15.62. In terms of profitability, CBAT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to AIRM's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAT is more volatile compared to AIRM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAT.Check AIRM's competition here
Ocean Power Technologies, Inc. (AMEX: OCESP)
CBAT vs OCESP Comparison August 2026
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: CBAT) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAT stands at 64.6M. In comparison, OCESP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CBAT is priced at $0.72 on the NASDAQ, while OCESP trades at $16.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.05, whereas OCESP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CBAT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to OCESP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CBAT is more volatile compared to OCESP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAT.Check OCESP's competition here
Blink Charging Co (NASDAQ: BLNKW)
CBAT vs BLNKW Comparison August 2026
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: CBAT) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAT stands at 64.6M. In comparison, BLNKW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CBAT is priced at $0.72 on the NASDAQ, while BLNKW trades at $10.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.05, whereas BLNKW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CBAT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to BLNKW's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAT is less volatile compared to BLNKW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAT.Check BLNKW's competition here
Juno Lighting, Inc. (NASDAQ: JUNO)
CBAT vs JUNO Comparison August 2026
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: CBAT) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAT stands at 64.6M. In comparison, JUNO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CBAT is priced at $0.72 on the NASDAQ, while JUNO trades at $86.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.05, whereas JUNO's P/E ratio is -20.89. In terms of profitability, CBAT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to JUNO's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAT is more volatile compared to JUNO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAT.Check JUNO's competition here
Energizer Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: ENR-PA)
CBAT vs ENR-PA Comparison August 2026
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: CBAT) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAT stands at 64.6M. In comparison, ENR-PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CBAT is priced at $0.72 on the NASDAQ, while ENR-PA trades at $89.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.05, whereas ENR-PA's P/E ratio is 42.39. In terms of profitability, CBAT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to ENR-PA's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAT is more volatile compared to ENR-PA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAT.Check ENR-PA's competition here