Asia Pacific Wire & Cable Corporation Limited (APWC) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (APWC) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Electrical Equipment & Parts Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| APWC | $1.38 | +3.76% | 28.5M | 4.60 | $0.30 | N/A |
| VRT | $300.57 | +0.02% | 115.5B | 75.73 | $3.97 | +0.07% |
| BE | $253.57 | -3.81% | 72.1B | -5070.60 | -$0.05 | N/A |
| ABB | $37.13 | -1.14% | 69B | 23.65 | $1.57 | N/A |
| AME | $225.95 | -0.27% | 51.8B | 34.12 | $6.62 | +0.56% |
| NVT | $163.81 | +0.58% | 26.5B | 55.51 | $2.95 | +0.50% |
| HUBB | $485.03 | +1.72% | 25.6B | 28.65 | $16.93 | +1.15% |
| FPS | $59.32 | +0.32% | 14.5B | 2965.50 | $0.02 | N/A |
| AEIS | $306.11 | +3.83% | 11.6B | 63.77 | $4.80 | +0.13% |
| POWL | $293.60 | +3.06% | 10.7B | 57.23 | $5.13 | +0.12% |
Stock Comparison
APWC vs VRT Comparison June 2026
APWC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APWC stands at 28.5M. In comparison, VRT has a market cap of 115.5B. Regarding current trading prices, APWC is priced at $1.38, while VRT trades at $300.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APWC currently has a P/E ratio of 4.60, whereas VRT's P/E ratio is 75.73. In terms of profitability, APWC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to VRT's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, APWC is more volatile compared to VRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APWC.Check VRT's competition here
APWC vs BE Comparison June 2026
APWC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APWC stands at 28.5M. In comparison, BE has a market cap of 72.1B. Regarding current trading prices, APWC is priced at $1.38, while BE trades at $253.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APWC currently has a P/E ratio of 4.60, whereas BE's P/E ratio is -5070.60. In terms of profitability, APWC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BE's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, APWC is less volatile compared to BE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APWC.Check BE's competition here
APWC vs ABB Comparison June 2026
APWC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APWC stands at 28.5M. In comparison, ABB has a market cap of 69B. Regarding current trading prices, APWC is priced at $1.38, while ABB trades at $37.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APWC currently has a P/E ratio of 4.60, whereas ABB's P/E ratio is 23.65. In terms of profitability, APWC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ABB's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, APWC is more volatile compared to ABB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APWC.Check ABB's competition here
APWC vs AME Comparison June 2026
APWC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APWC stands at 28.5M. In comparison, AME has a market cap of 51.8B. Regarding current trading prices, APWC is priced at $1.38, while AME trades at $225.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APWC currently has a P/E ratio of 4.60, whereas AME's P/E ratio is 34.12. In terms of profitability, APWC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AME's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, APWC is more volatile compared to AME. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APWC.Check AME's competition here
APWC vs NVT Comparison June 2026
APWC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APWC stands at 28.5M. In comparison, NVT has a market cap of 26.5B. Regarding current trading prices, APWC is priced at $1.38, while NVT trades at $163.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APWC currently has a P/E ratio of 4.60, whereas NVT's P/E ratio is 55.51. In terms of profitability, APWC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NVT's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, APWC is more volatile compared to NVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APWC.Check NVT's competition here
APWC vs HUBB Comparison June 2026
APWC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APWC stands at 28.5M. In comparison, HUBB has a market cap of 25.6B. Regarding current trading prices, APWC is priced at $1.38, while HUBB trades at $485.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APWC currently has a P/E ratio of 4.60, whereas HUBB's P/E ratio is 28.65. In terms of profitability, APWC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to HUBB's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, APWC is more volatile compared to HUBB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APWC.Check HUBB's competition here
APWC vs FPS Comparison June 2026
APWC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APWC stands at 28.5M. In comparison, FPS has a market cap of 14.5B. Regarding current trading prices, APWC is priced at $1.38, while FPS trades at $59.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APWC currently has a P/E ratio of 4.60, whereas FPS's P/E ratio is 2965.50. In terms of profitability, APWC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FPS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, APWC is more volatile compared to FPS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APWC.Check FPS's competition here
APWC vs AEIS Comparison June 2026
APWC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APWC stands at 28.5M. In comparison, AEIS has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, APWC is priced at $1.38, while AEIS trades at $306.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APWC currently has a P/E ratio of 4.60, whereas AEIS's P/E ratio is 63.77. In terms of profitability, APWC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AEIS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, APWC is less volatile compared to AEIS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APWC.Check AEIS's competition here
APWC vs POWL Comparison June 2026
APWC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APWC stands at 28.5M. In comparison, POWL has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, APWC is priced at $1.38, while POWL trades at $293.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APWC currently has a P/E ratio of 4.60, whereas POWL's P/E ratio is 57.23. In terms of profitability, APWC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to POWL's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, APWC is more volatile compared to POWL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APWC.Check POWL's competition here
APWC vs AYI Comparison June 2026
APWC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APWC stands at 28.5M. In comparison, AYI has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, APWC is priced at $1.38, while AYI trades at $296.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APWC currently has a P/E ratio of 4.60, whereas AYI's P/E ratio is 21.69. In terms of profitability, APWC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AYI's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, APWC is more volatile compared to AYI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APWC.Check AYI's competition here
APWC vs ENS Comparison June 2026
APWC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APWC stands at 28.5M. In comparison, ENS has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, APWC is priced at $1.38, while ENS trades at $228.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APWC currently has a P/E ratio of 4.60, whereas ENS's P/E ratio is 29.66. In terms of profitability, APWC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ENS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, APWC is more volatile compared to ENS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APWC.Check ENS's competition here
APWC vs WIRE Comparison June 2026
APWC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APWC stands at 28.5M. In comparison, WIRE has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, APWC is priced at $1.38, while WIRE trades at $289.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APWC currently has a P/E ratio of 4.60, whereas WIRE's P/E ratio is 15.22. In terms of profitability, APWC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to WIRE's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, APWC is more volatile compared to WIRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APWC.Check WIRE's competition here
APWC vs PLUG Comparison June 2026
APWC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APWC stands at 28.5M. In comparison, PLUG has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, APWC is priced at $1.38, while PLUG trades at $3.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APWC currently has a P/E ratio of 4.60, whereas PLUG's P/E ratio is -2.29. In terms of profitability, APWC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PLUG's ROE of -1.39%. Regarding short-term risk, APWC is less volatile compared to PLUG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APWC.Check PLUG's competition here
APWC vs HAYW Comparison June 2026
APWC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APWC stands at 28.5M. In comparison, HAYW has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, APWC is priced at $1.38, while HAYW trades at $14.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APWC currently has a P/E ratio of 4.60, whereas HAYW's P/E ratio is 19.34. In terms of profitability, APWC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to HAYW's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, APWC is more volatile compared to HAYW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APWC.Check HAYW's competition here
APWC vs ATKR Comparison June 2026
APWC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APWC stands at 28.5M. In comparison, ATKR has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, APWC is priced at $1.38, while ATKR trades at $80.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APWC currently has a P/E ratio of 4.60, whereas ATKR's P/E ratio is -22.33. In terms of profitability, APWC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ATKR's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, APWC is more volatile compared to ATKR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APWC.Check ATKR's competition here
APWC vs AMPX Comparison June 2026
APWC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APWC stands at 28.5M. In comparison, AMPX has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, APWC is priced at $1.38, while AMPX trades at $18.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APWC currently has a P/E ratio of 4.60, whereas AMPX's P/E ratio is -60.74. In terms of profitability, APWC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AMPX's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, APWC is less volatile compared to AMPX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APWC.Check AMPX's competition here
APWC vs PLPC Comparison June 2026
APWC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APWC stands at 28.5M. In comparison, PLPC has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, APWC is priced at $1.38, while PLPC trades at $373.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APWC currently has a P/E ratio of 4.60, whereas PLPC's P/E ratio is 53.70. In terms of profitability, APWC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PLPC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, APWC is more volatile compared to PLPC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APWC.Check PLPC's competition here
APWC vs EOSE Comparison June 2026
APWC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APWC stands at 28.5M. In comparison, EOSE has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, APWC is priced at $1.38, while EOSE trades at $6.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APWC currently has a P/E ratio of 4.60, whereas EOSE's P/E ratio is -1.05. In terms of profitability, APWC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to EOSE's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, APWC is less volatile compared to EOSE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APWC.Check EOSE's competition here
APWC vs HOLI Comparison June 2026
APWC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APWC stands at 28.5M. In comparison, HOLI has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, APWC is priced at $1.38, while HOLI trades at $26.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APWC currently has a P/E ratio of 4.60, whereas HOLI's P/E ratio is 21.83. In terms of profitability, APWC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to HOLI's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, APWC is more volatile compared to HOLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APWC.Check HOLI's competition here
APWC vs ENVX Comparison June 2026
APWC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APWC stands at 28.5M. In comparison, ENVX has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, APWC is priced at $1.38, while ENVX trades at $7.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APWC currently has a P/E ratio of 4.60, whereas ENVX's P/E ratio is -9.04. In terms of profitability, APWC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ENVX's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, APWC is less volatile compared to ENVX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APWC.Check ENVX's competition here
APWC vs TE Comparison June 2026
APWC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APWC stands at 28.5M. In comparison, TE has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, APWC is priced at $1.38, while TE trades at $9.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APWC currently has a P/E ratio of 4.60, whereas TE's P/E ratio is -4.87. In terms of profitability, APWC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TE's ROE of -1.46%. Regarding short-term risk, APWC is less volatile compared to TE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APWC.Check TE's competition here
APWC vs ENR Comparison June 2026
APWC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APWC stands at 28.5M. In comparison, ENR has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, APWC is priced at $1.38, while ENR trades at $19.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APWC currently has a P/E ratio of 4.60, whereas ENR's P/E ratio is 7.21. In terms of profitability, APWC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ENR's ROE of +1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, APWC is more volatile compared to ENR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APWC.Check ENR's competition here
APWC vs AMPX-WT Comparison June 2026
APWC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APWC stands at 28.5M. In comparison, AMPX-WT has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, APWC is priced at $1.38, while AMPX-WT trades at $8.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APWC currently has a P/E ratio of 4.60, whereas AMPX-WT's P/E ratio is -21.55. In terms of profitability, APWC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AMPX-WT's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, APWC is less volatile compared to AMPX-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APWC.Check AMPX-WT's competition here
APWC vs FCEL Comparison June 2026
APWC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APWC stands at 28.5M. In comparison, FCEL has a market cap of 821.2M. Regarding current trading prices, APWC is priced at $1.38, while FCEL trades at $15.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APWC currently has a P/E ratio of 4.60, whereas FCEL's P/E ratio is -2.39. In terms of profitability, APWC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FCEL's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, APWC is less volatile compared to FCEL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APWC.Check FCEL's competition here
APWC vs ADSE Comparison June 2026
APWC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APWC stands at 28.5M. In comparison, ADSE has a market cap of 676.9M. Regarding current trading prices, APWC is priced at $1.38, while ADSE trades at $11.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APWC currently has a P/E ratio of 4.60, whereas ADSE's P/E ratio is -9.82. In terms of profitability, APWC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ADSE's ROE of +4.92%. Regarding short-term risk, APWC is more volatile compared to ADSE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APWC.Check ADSE's competition here
APWC vs KE Comparison June 2026
APWC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APWC stands at 28.5M. In comparison, KE has a market cap of 609.4M. Regarding current trading prices, APWC is priced at $1.38, while KE trades at $25.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APWC currently has a P/E ratio of 4.60, whereas KE's P/E ratio is 24.13. In terms of profitability, APWC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to KE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, APWC is less volatile compared to KE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APWC.Check KE's competition here
APWC vs SLDP Comparison June 2026
APWC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APWC stands at 28.5M. In comparison, SLDP has a market cap of 545.7M. Regarding current trading prices, APWC is priced at $1.38, while SLDP trades at $2.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APWC currently has a P/E ratio of 4.60, whereas SLDP's P/E ratio is -6.03. In terms of profitability, APWC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SLDP's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, APWC is more volatile compared to SLDP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APWC.Check SLDP's competition here
APWC vs EOSEW Comparison June 2026
APWC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APWC stands at 28.5M. In comparison, EOSEW has a market cap of 423.2M. Regarding current trading prices, APWC is priced at $1.38, while EOSEW trades at $1.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APWC currently has a P/E ratio of 4.60, whereas EOSEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, APWC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to EOSEW's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, APWC is less volatile compared to EOSEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APWC.Check EOSEW's competition here
APWC vs MVST Comparison June 2026
APWC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APWC stands at 28.5M. In comparison, MVST has a market cap of 408.1M. Regarding current trading prices, APWC is priced at $1.38, while MVST trades at $1.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APWC currently has a P/E ratio of 4.60, whereas MVST's P/E ratio is -6.81. In terms of profitability, APWC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MVST's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, APWC is less volatile compared to MVST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APWC.Check MVST's competition here
APWC vs ELVA Comparison June 2026
APWC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APWC stands at 28.5M. In comparison, ELVA has a market cap of 404.5M. Regarding current trading prices, APWC is priced at $1.38, while ELVA trades at $10.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APWC currently has a P/E ratio of 4.60, whereas ELVA's P/E ratio is 94.09. In terms of profitability, APWC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ELVA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, APWC is less volatile compared to ELVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APWC.Check ELVA's competition here
APWC vs LTBR Comparison June 2026
APWC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APWC stands at 28.5M. In comparison, LTBR has a market cap of 246.2M. Regarding current trading prices, APWC is priced at $1.38, while LTBR trades at $9.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APWC currently has a P/E ratio of 4.60, whereas LTBR's P/E ratio is -12.50. In terms of profitability, APWC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to LTBR's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, APWC is less volatile compared to LTBR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APWC.Check LTBR's competition here
APWC vs FREY-WT Comparison June 2026
APWC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APWC stands at 28.5M. In comparison, FREY-WT has a market cap of 241.8M. Regarding current trading prices, APWC is priced at $1.38, while FREY-WT trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APWC currently has a P/E ratio of 4.60, whereas FREY-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, APWC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FREY-WT's ROE of -2.06%. Regarding short-term risk, APWC is more volatile compared to FREY-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APWC.Check FREY-WT's competition here
APWC vs FREY Comparison June 2026
APWC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APWC stands at 28.5M. In comparison, FREY has a market cap of 241.8M. Regarding current trading prices, APWC is priced at $1.38, while FREY trades at $1.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APWC currently has a P/E ratio of 4.60, whereas FREY's P/E ratio is -13.91. In terms of profitability, APWC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FREY's ROE of -1.89%. Regarding short-term risk, APWC is less volatile compared to FREY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APWC.Check FREY's competition here
APWC vs TE-WT Comparison June 2026
APWC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APWC stands at 28.5M. In comparison, TE-WT has a market cap of 231.8M. Regarding current trading prices, APWC is priced at $1.38, while TE-WT trades at $0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APWC currently has a P/E ratio of 4.60, whereas TE-WT's P/E ratio is -0.43. In terms of profitability, APWC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TE-WT's ROE of -1.46%. Regarding short-term risk, APWC is less volatile compared to TE-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APWC.Check TE-WT's competition here
APWC vs EAF Comparison June 2026
APWC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APWC stands at 28.5M. In comparison, EAF has a market cap of 230.4M. Regarding current trading prices, APWC is priced at $1.38, while EAF trades at $8.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APWC currently has a P/E ratio of 4.60, whereas EAF's P/E ratio is -1.03. In terms of profitability, APWC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to EAF's ROE of +0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, APWC is more volatile compared to EAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APWC.Check EAF's competition here
APWC vs STI Comparison June 2026
APWC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APWC stands at 28.5M. In comparison, STI has a market cap of 224.2M. Regarding current trading prices, APWC is priced at $1.38, while STI trades at $28.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APWC currently has a P/E ratio of 4.60, whereas STI's P/E ratio is -2.12. In terms of profitability, APWC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to STI's ROE of +4.71%. Regarding short-term risk, APWC is less volatile compared to STI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APWC.Check STI's competition here
APWC vs TGEN Comparison June 2026
APWC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APWC stands at 28.5M. In comparison, TGEN has a market cap of 180.4M. Regarding current trading prices, APWC is priced at $1.38, while TGEN trades at $6.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APWC currently has a P/E ratio of 4.60, whereas TGEN's P/E ratio is -17.74. In terms of profitability, APWC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TGEN's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, APWC is less volatile compared to TGEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APWC.Check TGEN's competition here
APWC vs RFIL Comparison June 2026
APWC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APWC stands at 28.5M. In comparison, RFIL has a market cap of 180.3M. Regarding current trading prices, APWC is priced at $1.38, while RFIL trades at $16.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APWC currently has a P/E ratio of 4.60, whereas RFIL's P/E ratio is 555.67. In terms of profitability, APWC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to RFIL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, APWC is less volatile compared to RFIL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APWC.Check RFIL's competition here
APWC vs ESP Comparison June 2026
APWC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APWC stands at 28.5M. In comparison, ESP has a market cap of 166.7M. Regarding current trading prices, APWC is priced at $1.38, while ESP trades at $55.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APWC currently has a P/E ratio of 4.60, whereas ESP's P/E ratio is 14.60. In terms of profitability, APWC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ESP's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, APWC is more volatile compared to ESP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APWC.Check ESP's competition here
APWC vs ENVXW Comparison June 2026
APWC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APWC stands at 28.5M. In comparison, ENVXW has a market cap of 158.8M. Regarding current trading prices, APWC is priced at $1.38, while ENVXW trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APWC currently has a P/E ratio of 4.60, whereas ENVXW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, APWC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ENVXW's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, APWC is less volatile compared to ENVXW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APWC.Check ENVXW's competition here
APWC vs SVT Comparison June 2026
APWC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APWC stands at 28.5M. In comparison, SVT has a market cap of 120M. Regarding current trading prices, APWC is priced at $1.38, while SVT trades at $46.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APWC currently has a P/E ratio of 4.60, whereas SVT's P/E ratio is -120.36. In terms of profitability, APWC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SVT's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, APWC is more volatile compared to SVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APWC.Check SVT's competition here
APWC vs SKYX Comparison June 2026
APWC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APWC stands at 28.5M. In comparison, SKYX has a market cap of 114.2M. Regarding current trading prices, APWC is priced at $1.38, while SKYX trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APWC currently has a P/E ratio of 4.60, whereas SKYX's P/E ratio is -3.50. In terms of profitability, APWC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SKYX's ROE of -4.33%. Regarding short-term risk, APWC is less volatile compared to SKYX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APWC.Check SKYX's competition here
APWC vs ULBI Comparison June 2026
APWC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APWC stands at 28.5M. In comparison, ULBI has a market cap of 110.9M. Regarding current trading prices, APWC is priced at $1.38, while ULBI trades at $6.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APWC currently has a P/E ratio of 4.60, whereas ULBI's P/E ratio is -13.59. In terms of profitability, APWC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ULBI's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, APWC is more volatile compared to ULBI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APWC.Check ULBI's competition here
APWC vs NVX Comparison June 2026
APWC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APWC stands at 28.5M. In comparison, NVX has a market cap of 90.5M. Regarding current trading prices, APWC is priced at $1.38, while NVX trades at $0.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APWC currently has a P/E ratio of 4.60, whereas NVX's P/E ratio is -1.30. In terms of profitability, APWC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NVX's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, APWC is more volatile compared to NVX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APWC.Check NVX's competition here
APWC vs NEOV Comparison June 2026
APWC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APWC stands at 28.5M. In comparison, NEOV has a market cap of 70.6M. Regarding current trading prices, APWC is priced at $1.38, while NEOV trades at $1.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APWC currently has a P/E ratio of 4.60, whereas NEOV's P/E ratio is -6.16. In terms of profitability, APWC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NEOV's ROE of -1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, APWC is less volatile compared to NEOV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APWC.Check NEOV's competition here
APWC vs CBAT Comparison June 2026
APWC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APWC stands at 28.5M. In comparison, CBAT has a market cap of 64.9M. Regarding current trading prices, APWC is priced at $1.38, while CBAT trades at $0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APWC currently has a P/E ratio of 4.60, whereas CBAT's P/E ratio is -4.07. In terms of profitability, APWC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CBAT's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, APWC is less volatile compared to CBAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APWC.Check CBAT's competition here
APWC vs NEOVW Comparison June 2026
APWC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APWC stands at 28.5M. In comparison, NEOVW has a market cap of 63.1M. Regarding current trading prices, APWC is priced at $1.38, while NEOVW trades at $1.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APWC currently has a P/E ratio of 4.60, whereas NEOVW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, APWC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NEOVW's ROE of -1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, APWC is less volatile compared to NEOVW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APWC.Check NEOVW's competition here
APWC vs OPTT Comparison June 2026
APWC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APWC stands at 28.5M. In comparison, OPTT has a market cap of 53.7M. Regarding current trading prices, APWC is priced at $1.38, while OPTT trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APWC currently has a P/E ratio of 4.60, whereas OPTT's P/E ratio is -1.48. In terms of profitability, APWC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to OPTT's ROE of -1.54%. Regarding short-term risk, APWC is more volatile compared to OPTT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APWC.Check OPTT's competition here
APWC vs IPWR Comparison June 2026
APWC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APWC stands at 28.5M. In comparison, IPWR has a market cap of 51.3M. Regarding current trading prices, APWC is priced at $1.38, while IPWR trades at $5.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APWC currently has a P/E ratio of 4.60, whereas IPWR's P/E ratio is -5.03. In terms of profitability, APWC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to IPWR's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, APWC is less volatile compared to IPWR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APWC.Check IPWR's competition here
APWC vs PPSI Comparison June 2026
APWC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APWC stands at 28.5M. In comparison, PPSI has a market cap of 46.4M. Regarding current trading prices, APWC is priced at $1.38, while PPSI trades at $4.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APWC currently has a P/E ratio of 4.60, whereas PPSI's P/E ratio is -6.74. In terms of profitability, APWC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PPSI's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, APWC is less volatile compared to PPSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APWC.Check PPSI's competition here
APWC vs ZOOZ Comparison June 2026
APWC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APWC stands at 28.5M. In comparison, ZOOZ has a market cap of 43.2M. Regarding current trading prices, APWC is priced at $1.38, while ZOOZ trades at $5.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APWC currently has a P/E ratio of 4.60, whereas ZOOZ's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, APWC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ZOOZ's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, APWC is less volatile compared to ZOOZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APWC.Check ZOOZ's competition here
APWC vs SLDPW Comparison June 2026
APWC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APWC stands at 28.5M. In comparison, SLDPW has a market cap of 37.4M. Regarding current trading prices, APWC is priced at $1.38, while SLDPW trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APWC currently has a P/E ratio of 4.60, whereas SLDPW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, APWC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SLDPW's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, APWC is less volatile compared to SLDPW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APWC.Check SLDPW's competition here
APWC vs OESX Comparison June 2026
APWC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APWC stands at 28.5M. In comparison, OESX has a market cap of 32.3M. Regarding current trading prices, APWC is priced at $1.38, while OESX trades at $9.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APWC currently has a P/E ratio of 4.60, whereas OESX's P/E ratio is -10.63. In terms of profitability, APWC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to OESX's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, APWC is less volatile compared to OESX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APWC.Check OESX's competition here
APWC vs ADSEW Comparison June 2026
APWC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APWC stands at 28.5M. In comparison, ADSEW has a market cap of 26M. Regarding current trading prices, APWC is priced at $1.38, while ADSEW trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APWC currently has a P/E ratio of 4.60, whereas ADSEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, APWC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ADSEW's ROE of +4.92%. Regarding short-term risk, APWC is less volatile compared to ADSEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APWC.Check ADSEW's competition here
APWC vs FLUX Comparison June 2026
APWC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APWC stands at 28.5M. In comparison, FLUX has a market cap of 17.5M. Regarding current trading prices, APWC is priced at $1.38, while FLUX trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APWC currently has a P/E ratio of 4.60, whereas FLUX's P/E ratio is -2.94. In terms of profitability, APWC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FLUX's ROE of -7.38%. Regarding short-term risk, APWC is less volatile compared to FLUX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APWC.Check FLUX's competition here
APWC vs SDST Comparison June 2026
APWC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APWC stands at 28.5M. In comparison, SDST has a market cap of 16.8M. Regarding current trading prices, APWC is priced at $1.38, while SDST trades at $1.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APWC currently has a P/E ratio of 4.60, whereas SDST's P/E ratio is -1.02. In terms of profitability, APWC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SDST's ROE of +3.02%. Regarding short-term risk, APWC is less volatile compared to SDST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APWC.Check SDST's competition here
APWC vs CHEV Comparison June 2026
APWC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APWC stands at 28.5M. In comparison, CHEV has a market cap of 14.1M. Regarding current trading prices, APWC is priced at $1.38, while CHEV trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APWC currently has a P/E ratio of 4.60, whereas CHEV's P/E ratio is -17.86. In terms of profitability, APWC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CHEV's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, APWC is more volatile compared to CHEV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APWC.Check CHEV's competition here
APWC vs PITA Comparison June 2026
APWC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APWC stands at 28.5M. In comparison, PITA has a market cap of 11.1M. Regarding current trading prices, APWC is priced at $1.38, while PITA trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APWC currently has a P/E ratio of 4.60, whereas PITA's P/E ratio is -2.92. In terms of profitability, APWC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PITA's ROE of +2.03%. Regarding short-term risk, APWC is more volatile compared to PITA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APWC.Check PITA's competition here
APWC vs GWH Comparison June 2026
APWC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APWC stands at 28.5M. In comparison, GWH has a market cap of 10.8M. Regarding current trading prices, APWC is priced at $1.38, while GWH trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APWC currently has a P/E ratio of 4.60, whereas GWH's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, APWC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GWH's ROE of -12.52%. Regarding short-term risk, APWC is less volatile compared to GWH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APWC.Check GWH's competition here
APWC vs SES-WT Comparison June 2026
APWC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APWC stands at 28.5M. In comparison, SES-WT has a market cap of 9.6M. Regarding current trading prices, APWC is priced at $1.38, while SES-WT trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APWC currently has a P/E ratio of 4.60, whereas SES-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, APWC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SES-WT's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, APWC is less volatile compared to SES-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APWC.Check SES-WT's competition here
APWC vs GCDT Comparison June 2026
APWC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APWC stands at 28.5M. In comparison, GCDT has a market cap of 6.3M. Regarding current trading prices, APWC is priced at $1.38, while GCDT trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APWC currently has a P/E ratio of 4.60, whereas GCDT's P/E ratio is -10.57. In terms of profitability, APWC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GCDT's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, APWC is less volatile compared to GCDT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APWC.Check GCDT's competition here
APWC vs NXU Comparison June 2026
APWC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APWC stands at 28.5M. In comparison, NXU has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, APWC is priced at $1.38, while NXU trades at $2.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APWC currently has a P/E ratio of 4.60, whereas NXU's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, APWC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NXU's ROE of -1.71%. Regarding short-term risk, APWC is more volatile compared to NXU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APWC.Check NXU's competition here
APWC vs POLA Comparison June 2026
APWC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APWC stands at 28.5M. In comparison, POLA has a market cap of 5.2M. Regarding current trading prices, APWC is priced at $1.38, while POLA trades at $1.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APWC currently has a P/E ratio of 4.60, whereas POLA's P/E ratio is -0.60. In terms of profitability, APWC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to POLA's ROE of -2.61%. Regarding short-term risk, APWC is less volatile compared to POLA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APWC.Check POLA's competition here
APWC vs GWH-WT Comparison June 2026
APWC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APWC stands at 28.5M. In comparison, GWH-WT has a market cap of 4.3M. Regarding current trading prices, APWC is priced at $1.38, while GWH-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APWC currently has a P/E ratio of 4.60, whereas GWH-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, APWC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GWH-WT's ROE of -12.52%. Regarding short-term risk, APWC is less volatile compared to GWH-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APWC.Check GWH-WT's competition here
APWC vs MVSTW Comparison June 2026
APWC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APWC stands at 28.5M. In comparison, MVSTW has a market cap of 3.4M. Regarding current trading prices, APWC is priced at $1.38, while MVSTW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APWC currently has a P/E ratio of 4.60, whereas MVSTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, APWC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MVSTW's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, APWC is less volatile compared to MVSTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APWC.Check MVSTW's competition here
APWC vs XPON Comparison June 2026
APWC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APWC stands at 28.5M. In comparison, XPON has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, APWC is priced at $1.38, while XPON trades at $0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APWC currently has a P/E ratio of 4.60, whereas XPON's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, APWC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to XPON's ROE of -1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, APWC is less volatile compared to XPON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APWC.Check XPON's competition here
APWC vs SDSTW Comparison June 2026
APWC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APWC stands at 28.5M. In comparison, SDSTW has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, APWC is priced at $1.38, while SDSTW trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APWC currently has a P/E ratio of 4.60, whereas SDSTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, APWC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SDSTW's ROE of +3.02%. Regarding short-term risk, APWC is less volatile compared to SDSTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APWC.Check SDSTW's competition here
APWC vs DFLI Comparison June 2026
APWC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APWC stands at 28.5M. In comparison, DFLI has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, APWC is priced at $1.38, while DFLI trades at $1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APWC currently has a P/E ratio of 4.60, whereas DFLI's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, APWC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to DFLI's ROE of +12.27%. Regarding short-term risk, APWC is less volatile compared to DFLI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APWC.Check DFLI's competition here
APWC vs ELPW Comparison June 2026
APWC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APWC stands at 28.5M. In comparison, ELPW has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, APWC is priced at $1.38, while ELPW trades at $0.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APWC currently has a P/E ratio of 4.60, whereas ELPW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, APWC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ELPW's ROE of +3.89%. Regarding short-term risk, APWC is less volatile compared to ELPW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APWC.Check ELPW's competition here
APWC vs CCTG Comparison June 2026
APWC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APWC stands at 28.5M. In comparison, CCTG has a market cap of 529.8K. Regarding current trading prices, APWC is priced at $1.38, while CCTG trades at $0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APWC currently has a P/E ratio of 4.60, whereas CCTG's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, APWC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CCTG's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, APWC is less volatile compared to CCTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APWC.Check CCTG's competition here
APWC vs DFLIW Comparison June 2026
APWC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APWC stands at 28.5M. In comparison, DFLIW has a market cap of 386.3K. Regarding current trading prices, APWC is priced at $1.38, while DFLIW trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APWC currently has a P/E ratio of 4.60, whereas DFLIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, APWC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to DFLIW's ROE of +12.27%. Regarding short-term risk, APWC is more volatile compared to DFLIW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APWC.Check DFLIW's competition here
APWC vs RAYA Comparison June 2026
APWC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APWC stands at 28.5M. In comparison, RAYA has a market cap of 370.5K. Regarding current trading prices, APWC is priced at $1.38, while RAYA trades at $3.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APWC currently has a P/E ratio of 4.60, whereas RAYA's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, APWC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to RAYA's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, APWC is less volatile compared to RAYA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APWC.Check RAYA's competition here
APWC vs ZOOZW Comparison June 2026
APWC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APWC stands at 28.5M. In comparison, ZOOZW has a market cap of 312.3K. Regarding current trading prices, APWC is priced at $1.38, while ZOOZW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APWC currently has a P/E ratio of 4.60, whereas ZOOZW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, APWC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ZOOZW's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, APWC is less volatile compared to ZOOZW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APWC.Check ZOOZW's competition here
APWC vs DCFCW Comparison June 2026
APWC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APWC stands at 28.5M. In comparison, DCFCW has a market cap of 11.2K. Regarding current trading prices, APWC is priced at $1.38, while DCFCW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APWC currently has a P/E ratio of 4.60, whereas DCFCW's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, APWC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to DCFCW's ROE of +1.31%. Regarding short-term risk, APWC is less volatile compared to DCFCW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APWC.Check DCFCW's competition here
APWC vs DCFC Comparison June 2026
APWC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APWC stands at 28.5M. In comparison, DCFC has a market cap of 9.1K. Regarding current trading prices, APWC is priced at $1.38, while DCFC trades at $3.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APWC currently has a P/E ratio of 4.60, whereas DCFC's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, APWC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to DCFC's ROE of +1.32%. Regarding short-term risk, APWC is more volatile compared to DCFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APWC.Check DCFC's competition here
APWC vs JUNO Comparison June 2026
APWC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APWC stands at 28.5M. In comparison, JUNO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, APWC is priced at $1.38, while JUNO trades at $86.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APWC currently has a P/E ratio of 4.60, whereas JUNO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, APWC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to JUNO's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, APWC is more volatile compared to JUNO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APWC.Check JUNO's competition here
APWC vs ENR-PA Comparison June 2026
APWC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APWC stands at 28.5M. In comparison, ENR-PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, APWC is priced at $1.38, while ENR-PA trades at $89.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APWC currently has a P/E ratio of 4.60, whereas ENR-PA's P/E ratio is 42.39. In terms of profitability, APWC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ENR-PA's ROE of +1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, APWC is more volatile compared to ENR-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APWC.Check ENR-PA's competition here
APWC vs AIRM Comparison June 2026
APWC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APWC stands at 28.5M. In comparison, AIRM has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, APWC is priced at $1.38, while AIRM trades at $42.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APWC currently has a P/E ratio of 4.60, whereas AIRM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, APWC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AIRM's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, APWC is more volatile compared to AIRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APWC.Check AIRM's competition here
APWC vs BLNKW Comparison June 2026
APWC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APWC stands at 28.5M. In comparison, BLNKW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, APWC is priced at $1.38, while BLNKW trades at $10.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APWC currently has a P/E ratio of 4.60, whereas BLNKW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, APWC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BLNKW's ROE of -1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, APWC is less volatile compared to BLNKW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APWC.Check BLNKW's competition here