Powell Industries, Inc.
Powell Industries, Inc. (POWL) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (POWL) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Electrical Equipment & Parts Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| POWL | $252.76 | +0.23% | 9.2B | 49.27 | $5.13 | +0.14% |
| VRT | $323.46 | +0.53% | 124.2B | 81.06 | $3.99 | +0.06% |
| ABB | $37.13 | -1.14% | 69B | 23.65 | $1.57 | N/A |
| BE | $231.17 | -2.69% | 55.5B | -624.41 | -$0.37 | N/A |
| HUBB | $553.07 | -0.86% | 29.4B | 33.42 | $16.55 | +0.99% |
| NVT | $142.17 | -0.41% | 23B | 54.67 | $2.60 | +0.57% |
| AEIS | $387.24 | +1.25% | 14.7B | 99.55 | $3.89 | +0.10% |
| AYI | $289.57 | +0.05% | 8.9B | 21.23 | $13.64 | +0.26% |
| FPS | $35.14 | +1.50% | 8.2B | -1172.67 | -$0.03 | N/A |
| ENS | $209.30 | +0.72% | 7.7B | 25.92 | $8.07 | +0.49% |
Stock Comparison
POWL vs VRT Comparison April 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 9.2B. In comparison, VRT has a market cap of 124.2B. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $252.76, while VRT trades at $323.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 49.27, whereas VRT's P/E ratio is 81.06. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.31%, compared to VRT's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is more volatile compared to VRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check VRT's competition here
POWL vs ABB Comparison April 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 9.2B. In comparison, ABB has a market cap of 69B. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $252.76, while ABB trades at $37.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 49.27, whereas ABB's P/E ratio is 23.65. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.31%, compared to ABB's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is more volatile compared to ABB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check ABB's competition here
POWL vs BE Comparison April 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 9.2B. In comparison, BE has a market cap of 55.5B. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $252.76, while BE trades at $231.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 49.27, whereas BE's P/E ratio is -624.41. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.31%, compared to BE's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is more volatile compared to BE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check BE's competition here
POWL vs HUBB Comparison April 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 9.2B. In comparison, HUBB has a market cap of 29.4B. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $252.76, while HUBB trades at $553.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 49.27, whereas HUBB's P/E ratio is 33.42. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.31%, compared to HUBB's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is more volatile compared to HUBB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check HUBB's competition here
POWL vs NVT Comparison April 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 9.2B. In comparison, NVT has a market cap of 23B. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $252.76, while NVT trades at $142.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 49.27, whereas NVT's P/E ratio is 54.67. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.31%, compared to NVT's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is more volatile compared to NVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check NVT's competition here
POWL vs AEIS Comparison April 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 9.2B. In comparison, AEIS has a market cap of 14.7B. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $252.76, while AEIS trades at $387.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 49.27, whereas AEIS's P/E ratio is 99.55. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.31%, compared to AEIS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is more volatile compared to AEIS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check AEIS's competition here
POWL vs AYI Comparison April 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 9.2B. In comparison, AYI has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $252.76, while AYI trades at $289.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 49.27, whereas AYI's P/E ratio is 21.23. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.31%, compared to AYI's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is more volatile compared to AYI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check AYI's competition here
POWL vs FPS Comparison April 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 9.2B. In comparison, FPS has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $252.76, while FPS trades at $35.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 49.27, whereas FPS's P/E ratio is -1172.67. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.31%, compared to FPS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is more volatile compared to FPS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check FPS's competition here
POWL vs ENS Comparison April 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 9.2B. In comparison, ENS has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $252.76, while ENS trades at $209.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 49.27, whereas ENS's P/E ratio is 25.92. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.31%, compared to ENS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is more volatile compared to ENS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check ENS's competition here
POWL vs WIRE Comparison April 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 9.2B. In comparison, WIRE has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $252.76, while WIRE trades at $289.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 49.27, whereas WIRE's P/E ratio is 15.22. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.31%, compared to WIRE's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is more volatile compared to WIRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check WIRE's competition here
POWL vs PLUG Comparison April 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 9.2B. In comparison, PLUG has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $252.76, while PLUG trades at $3.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 49.27, whereas PLUG's P/E ratio is -2.21. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.31%, compared to PLUG's ROE of -1.10%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is less volatile compared to PLUG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check PLUG's competition here
POWL vs HAYW Comparison April 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 9.2B. In comparison, HAYW has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $252.76, while HAYW trades at $15.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 49.27, whereas HAYW's P/E ratio is 22.59. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.31%, compared to HAYW's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is more volatile compared to HAYW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check HAYW's competition here
POWL vs AMPX Comparison April 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 9.2B. In comparison, AMPX has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $252.76, while AMPX trades at $20.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 49.27, whereas AMPX's P/E ratio is -58.99. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.31%, compared to AMPX's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is less volatile compared to AMPX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check AMPX's competition here
POWL vs ATKR Comparison April 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 9.2B. In comparison, ATKR has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $252.76, while ATKR trades at $75.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 49.27, whereas ATKR's P/E ratio is -56.71. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.31%, compared to ATKR's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is more volatile compared to ATKR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check ATKR's competition here
POWL vs EOSE Comparison April 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 9.2B. In comparison, EOSE has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $252.76, while EOSE trades at $7.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 49.27, whereas EOSE's P/E ratio is -1.15. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.31%, compared to EOSE's ROE of +0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is less volatile compared to EOSE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check EOSE's competition here
POWL vs PLPC Comparison April 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 9.2B. In comparison, PLPC has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $252.76, while PLPC trades at $351.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 49.27, whereas PLPC's P/E ratio is 49.11. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.31%, compared to PLPC's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is less volatile compared to PLPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check PLPC's competition here
POWL vs HOLI Comparison April 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 9.2B. In comparison, HOLI has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $252.76, while HOLI trades at $26.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 49.27, whereas HOLI's P/E ratio is 21.83. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.31%, compared to HOLI's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is more volatile compared to HOLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check HOLI's competition here
POWL vs ENVX Comparison April 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 9.2B. In comparison, ENVX has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $252.76, while ENVX trades at $6.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 49.27, whereas ENVX's P/E ratio is -8.81. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.31%, compared to ENVX's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is less volatile compared to ENVX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check ENVX's competition here
POWL vs ENR Comparison April 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 9.2B. In comparison, ENR has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $252.76, while ENR trades at $19.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 49.27, whereas ENR's P/E ratio is 6.73. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.31%, compared to ENR's ROE of +1.36%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is more volatile compared to ENR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check ENR's competition here
POWL vs AMPX-WT Comparison April 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 9.2B. In comparison, AMPX-WT has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $252.76, while AMPX-WT trades at $9.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 49.27, whereas AMPX-WT's P/E ratio is -24.38. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.31%, compared to AMPX-WT's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is less volatile compared to AMPX-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check AMPX-WT's competition here
POWL vs TE Comparison April 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 9.2B. In comparison, TE has a market cap of 917.6M. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $252.76, while TE trades at $5.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 49.27, whereas TE's P/E ratio is -2.74. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.31%, compared to TE's ROE of -1.54%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is less volatile compared to TE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check TE's competition here
POWL vs ADSE Comparison April 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 9.2B. In comparison, ADSE has a market cap of 722.7M. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $252.76, while ADSE trades at $12.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 49.27, whereas ADSE's P/E ratio is -11.13. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.31%, compared to ADSE's ROE of +4.27%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is more volatile compared to ADSE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check ADSE's competition here
POWL vs SLDP Comparison April 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 9.2B. In comparison, SLDP has a market cap of 677.7M. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $252.76, while SLDP trades at $3.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 49.27, whereas SLDP's P/E ratio is -7.20. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.31%, compared to SLDP's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is less volatile compared to SLDP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check SLDP's competition here
POWL vs KE Comparison April 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 9.2B. In comparison, KE has a market cap of 675.1M. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $252.76, while KE trades at $27.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 49.27, whereas KE's P/E ratio is 28.60. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.31%, compared to KE's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is more volatile compared to KE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check KE's competition here
POWL vs MVST Comparison April 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 9.2B. In comparison, MVST has a market cap of 627.5M. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $252.76, while MVST trades at $1.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 49.27, whereas MVST's P/E ratio is -21.00. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.31%, compared to MVST's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is less volatile compared to MVST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check MVST's competition here
POWL vs FCEL Comparison April 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 9.2B. In comparison, FCEL has a market cap of 592.3M. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $252.76, while FCEL trades at $11.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 49.27, whereas FCEL's P/E ratio is -1.72. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.31%, compared to FCEL's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is less volatile compared to FCEL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check FCEL's competition here
POWL vs EOSEW Comparison April 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 9.2B. In comparison, EOSEW has a market cap of 423.2M. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $252.76, while EOSEW trades at $1.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 49.27, whereas EOSEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.31%, compared to EOSEW's ROE of +0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is less volatile compared to EOSEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check EOSEW's competition here
POWL vs ELVA Comparison April 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 9.2B. In comparison, ELVA has a market cap of 380.7M. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $252.76, while ELVA trades at $9.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 49.27, whereas ELVA's P/E ratio is 88.55. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.31%, compared to ELVA's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is less volatile compared to ELVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check ELVA's competition here
POWL vs LTBR Comparison April 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 9.2B. In comparison, LTBR has a market cap of 326.8M. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $252.76, while LTBR trades at $12.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 49.27, whereas LTBR's P/E ratio is -15.76. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.31%, compared to LTBR's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is less volatile compared to LTBR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check LTBR's competition here
POWL vs EAF Comparison April 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 9.2B. In comparison, EAF has a market cap of 245.3M. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $252.76, while EAF trades at $9.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 49.27, whereas EAF's P/E ratio is -1.12. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.31%, compared to EAF's ROE of +1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is less volatile compared to EAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check EAF's competition here
POWL vs FREY-WT Comparison April 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 9.2B. In comparison, FREY-WT has a market cap of 241.8M. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $252.76, while FREY-WT trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 49.27, whereas FREY-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.31%, compared to FREY-WT's ROE of -1.54%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is more volatile compared to FREY-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check FREY-WT's competition here
POWL vs FREY Comparison April 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 9.2B. In comparison, FREY has a market cap of 241.8M. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $252.76, while FREY trades at $1.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 49.27, whereas FREY's P/E ratio is -13.91. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.31%, compared to FREY's ROE of -1.83%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is more volatile compared to FREY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check FREY's competition here
POWL vs AIRJ Comparison April 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 9.2B. In comparison, AIRJ has a market cap of 217.7M. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $252.76, while AIRJ trades at $3.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 49.27, whereas AIRJ's P/E ratio is -21.20. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.31%, compared to AIRJ's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is less volatile compared to AIRJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check AIRJ's competition here
POWL vs ESP Comparison April 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 9.2B. In comparison, ESP has a market cap of 203.1M. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $252.76, while ESP trades at $68.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 49.27, whereas ESP's P/E ratio is 19.90. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.31%, compared to ESP's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is more volatile compared to ESP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check ESP's competition here
POWL vs RFIL Comparison April 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 9.2B. In comparison, RFIL has a market cap of 159.7M. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $252.76, while RFIL trades at $14.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 49.27, whereas RFIL's P/E ratio is 492.33. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.31%, compared to RFIL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is less volatile compared to RFIL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check RFIL's competition here
POWL vs ENVXW Comparison April 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 9.2B. In comparison, ENVXW has a market cap of 156.9M. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $252.76, while ENVXW trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 49.27, whereas ENVXW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.31%, compared to ENVXW's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is less volatile compared to ENVXW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check ENVXW's competition here
POWL vs TGEN Comparison April 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 9.2B. In comparison, TGEN has a market cap of 127.5M. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $252.76, while TGEN trades at $4.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 49.27, whereas TGEN's P/E ratio is -14.23. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.31%, compared to TGEN's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is less volatile compared to TGEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check TGEN's competition here
POWL vs ULBI Comparison April 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 9.2B. In comparison, ULBI has a market cap of 127.1M. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $252.76, while ULBI trades at $7.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 49.27, whereas ULBI's P/E ratio is -21.80. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.31%, compared to ULBI's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is less volatile compared to ULBI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check ULBI's competition here
POWL vs SVT Comparison April 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 9.2B. In comparison, SVT has a market cap of 120M. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $252.76, while SVT trades at $46.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 49.27, whereas SVT's P/E ratio is -120.36. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.31%, compared to SVT's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is more volatile compared to SVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check SVT's competition here
POWL vs SKYX Comparison April 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 9.2B. In comparison, SKYX has a market cap of 114.7M. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $252.76, while SKYX trades at $1.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 49.27, whereas SKYX's P/E ratio is -3.30. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.31%, compared to SKYX's ROE of -11.58%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is less volatile compared to SKYX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check SKYX's competition here
POWL vs NVX Comparison April 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 9.2B. In comparison, NVX has a market cap of 107.3M. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $252.76, while NVX trades at $0.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 49.27, whereas NVX's P/E ratio is -1.29. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.31%, compared to NVX's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is less volatile compared to NVX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check NVX's competition here
POWL vs NEOV Comparison April 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 9.2B. In comparison, NEOV has a market cap of 95.3M. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $252.76, while NEOV trades at $2.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 49.27, whereas NEOV's P/E ratio is -9.59. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.31%, compared to NEOV's ROE of -2.85%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is less volatile compared to NEOV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check NEOV's competition here
POWL vs CBAT Comparison April 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 9.2B. In comparison, CBAT has a market cap of 73.1M. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $252.76, while CBAT trades at $0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 49.27, whereas CBAT's P/E ratio is -8.25. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.31%, compared to CBAT's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is more volatile compared to CBAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check CBAT's competition here
POWL vs OPTT Comparison April 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 9.2B. In comparison, OPTT has a market cap of 66.3M. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $252.76, while OPTT trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 49.27, whereas OPTT's P/E ratio is -1.83. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.31%, compared to OPTT's ROE of -1.54%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is more volatile compared to OPTT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check OPTT's competition here
POWL vs SLDPW Comparison April 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 9.2B. In comparison, SLDPW has a market cap of 60.5M. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $252.76, while SLDPW trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 49.27, whereas SLDPW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.31%, compared to SLDPW's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is less volatile compared to SLDPW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check SLDPW's competition here
POWL vs NEOVW Comparison April 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 9.2B. In comparison, NEOVW has a market cap of 60.3M. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $252.76, while NEOVW trades at $1.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 49.27, whereas NEOVW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.31%, compared to NEOVW's ROE of -2.85%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is less volatile compared to NEOVW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check NEOVW's competition here
POWL vs IPWR Comparison April 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 9.2B. In comparison, IPWR has a market cap of 42.4M. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $252.76, while IPWR trades at $4.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 49.27, whereas IPWR's P/E ratio is -3.88. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.31%, compared to IPWR's ROE of -0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is less volatile compared to IPWR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check IPWR's competition here
POWL vs CHEV Comparison April 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 9.2B. In comparison, CHEV has a market cap of 37.8M. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $252.76, while CHEV trades at $3.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 49.27, whereas CHEV's P/E ratio is -82.50. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.31%, compared to CHEV's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is more volatile compared to CHEV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check CHEV's competition here
POWL vs PPSI Comparison April 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 9.2B. In comparison, PPSI has a market cap of 35.4M. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $252.76, while PPSI trades at $3.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 49.27, whereas PPSI's P/E ratio is -5.50. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.31%, compared to PPSI's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is less volatile compared to PPSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check PPSI's competition here
POWL vs ADSEW Comparison April 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 9.2B. In comparison, ADSEW has a market cap of 34.9M. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $252.76, while ADSEW trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 49.27, whereas ADSEW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.31%, compared to ADSEW's ROE of +4.27%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is less volatile compared to ADSEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check ADSEW's competition here
POWL vs OESX Comparison April 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 9.2B. In comparison, OESX has a market cap of 31.6M. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $252.76, while OESX trades at $9.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 49.27, whereas OESX's P/E ratio is -6.76. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.31%, compared to OESX's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is more volatile compared to OESX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check OESX's competition here
POWL vs APWC Comparison April 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 9.2B. In comparison, APWC has a market cap of 28.4M. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $252.76, while APWC trades at $1.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 49.27, whereas APWC's P/E ratio is 9.84. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.31%, compared to APWC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is more volatile compared to APWC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check APWC's competition here
POWL vs FLUX Comparison April 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 9.2B. In comparison, FLUX has a market cap of 22.1M. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $252.76, while FLUX trades at $1.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 49.27, whereas FLUX's P/E ratio is -4.20. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.31%, compared to FLUX's ROE of +3.65%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is less volatile compared to FLUX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check FLUX's competition here
POWL vs SDST Comparison April 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 9.2B. In comparison, SDST has a market cap of 21.8M. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $252.76, while SDST trades at $2.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 49.27, whereas SDST's P/E ratio is -1.21. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.31%, compared to SDST's ROE of +2.27%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is less volatile compared to SDST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check SDST's competition here
POWL vs MVSTW Comparison April 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 9.2B. In comparison, MVSTW has a market cap of 18.2M. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $252.76, while MVSTW trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 49.27, whereas MVSTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.31%, compared to MVSTW's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is less volatile compared to MVSTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check MVSTW's competition here
POWL vs GWH Comparison April 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 9.2B. In comparison, GWH has a market cap of 14.2M. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $252.76, while GWH trades at $1.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 49.27, whereas GWH's P/E ratio is -0.26. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.31%, compared to GWH's ROE of -11.41%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is more volatile compared to GWH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check GWH's competition here
POWL vs PITA Comparison April 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 9.2B. In comparison, PITA has a market cap of 11.1M. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $252.76, while PITA trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 49.27, whereas PITA's P/E ratio is -2.92. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.31%, compared to PITA's ROE of +2.03%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is more volatile compared to PITA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check PITA's competition here
POWL vs STI Comparison April 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 9.2B. In comparison, STI has a market cap of 10.9M. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $252.76, while STI trades at $4.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 49.27, whereas STI's P/E ratio is -0.39. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.31%, compared to STI's ROE of +3.24%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is less volatile compared to STI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check STI's competition here
POWL vs SES-WT Comparison April 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 9.2B. In comparison, SES-WT has a market cap of 9.7M. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $252.76, while SES-WT trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 49.27, whereas SES-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.31%, compared to SES-WT's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is less volatile compared to SES-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check SES-WT's competition here
POWL vs GCDT Comparison April 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 9.2B. In comparison, GCDT has a market cap of 7.5M. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $252.76, while GCDT trades at $0.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 49.27, whereas GCDT's P/E ratio is -12.56. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.31%, compared to GCDT's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is less volatile compared to GCDT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check GCDT's competition here
POWL vs GWH-WT Comparison April 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 9.2B. In comparison, GWH-WT has a market cap of 7.4M. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $252.76, while GWH-WT trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 49.27, whereas GWH-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.31%, compared to GWH-WT's ROE of -11.41%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is more volatile compared to GWH-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check GWH-WT's competition here
POWL vs NXU Comparison April 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 9.2B. In comparison, NXU has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $252.76, while NXU trades at $2.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 49.27, whereas NXU's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.31%, compared to NXU's ROE of -1.41%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is more volatile compared to NXU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check NXU's competition here
POWL vs ELPW Comparison April 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 9.2B. In comparison, ELPW has a market cap of 5.2M. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $252.76, while ELPW trades at $3.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 49.27, whereas ELPW's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.31%, compared to ELPW's ROE of +3.89%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is less volatile compared to ELPW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check ELPW's competition here
POWL vs POLA Comparison April 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 9.2B. In comparison, POLA has a market cap of 4.4M. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $252.76, while POLA trades at $1.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 49.27, whereas POLA's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.31%, compared to POLA's ROE of -2.12%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is less volatile compared to POLA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check POLA's competition here
POWL vs ZOOZ Comparison April 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 9.2B. In comparison, ZOOZ has a market cap of 3.9M. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $252.76, while ZOOZ trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 49.27, whereas ZOOZ's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.31%, compared to ZOOZ's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is more volatile compared to ZOOZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check ZOOZ's competition here
POWL vs XPON Comparison April 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 9.2B. In comparison, XPON has a market cap of 2.7M. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $252.76, while XPON trades at $0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 49.27, whereas XPON's P/E ratio is -0.65. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.31%, compared to XPON's ROE of -1.20%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is less volatile compared to XPON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check XPON's competition here
POWL vs SDSTW Comparison April 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 9.2B. In comparison, SDSTW has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $252.76, while SDSTW trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 49.27, whereas SDSTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.31%, compared to SDSTW's ROE of +2.27%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is more volatile compared to SDSTW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check SDSTW's competition here
POWL vs DFLI Comparison April 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 9.2B. In comparison, DFLI has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $252.76, while DFLI trades at $2.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 49.27, whereas DFLI's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.31%, compared to DFLI's ROE of +6.64%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is less volatile compared to DFLI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check DFLI's competition here
POWL vs CCTG Comparison April 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 9.2B. In comparison, CCTG has a market cap of 712K. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $252.76, while CCTG trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 49.27, whereas CCTG's P/E ratio is -0.44. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.31%, compared to CCTG's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is less volatile compared to CCTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check CCTG's competition here
POWL vs DFLIW Comparison April 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 9.2B. In comparison, DFLIW has a market cap of 504.1K. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $252.76, while DFLIW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 49.27, whereas DFLIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.31%, compared to DFLIW's ROE of +6.64%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is less volatile compared to DFLIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check DFLIW's competition here
POWL vs RAYA Comparison April 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 9.2B. In comparison, RAYA has a market cap of 330.5K. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $252.76, while RAYA trades at $3.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 49.27, whereas RAYA's P/E ratio is 0.10. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.31%, compared to RAYA's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is less volatile compared to RAYA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check RAYA's competition here
POWL vs ZOOZW Comparison April 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 9.2B. In comparison, ZOOZW has a market cap of 327.7K. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $252.76, while ZOOZW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 49.27, whereas ZOOZW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.31%, compared to ZOOZW's ROE of -0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is less volatile compared to ZOOZW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check ZOOZW's competition here
POWL vs DCFCW Comparison April 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 9.2B. In comparison, DCFCW has a market cap of 11.2K. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $252.76, while DCFCW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 49.27, whereas DCFCW's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.31%, compared to DCFCW's ROE of +1.31%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is less volatile compared to DCFCW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check DCFCW's competition here
POWL vs DCFC Comparison April 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 9.2B. In comparison, DCFC has a market cap of 9.1K. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $252.76, while DCFC trades at $3.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 49.27, whereas DCFC's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.31%, compared to DCFC's ROE of +1.32%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is more volatile compared to DCFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check DCFC's competition here
POWL vs AIRM Comparison April 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 9.2B. In comparison, AIRM has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $252.76, while AIRM trades at $42.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 49.27, whereas AIRM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.31%, compared to AIRM's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is more volatile compared to AIRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check AIRM's competition here
POWL vs ENR-PA Comparison April 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 9.2B. In comparison, ENR-PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $252.76, while ENR-PA trades at $89.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 49.27, whereas ENR-PA's P/E ratio is 42.39. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.31%, compared to ENR-PA's ROE of +1.36%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is more volatile compared to ENR-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check ENR-PA's competition here
POWL vs BLNKW Comparison April 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 9.2B. In comparison, BLNKW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $252.76, while BLNKW trades at $10.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 49.27, whereas BLNKW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.31%, compared to BLNKW's ROE of -1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is less volatile compared to BLNKW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check BLNKW's competition here
POWL vs JUNO Comparison April 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 9.2B. In comparison, JUNO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $252.76, while JUNO trades at $86.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 49.27, whereas JUNO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.31%, compared to JUNO's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is more volatile compared to JUNO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check JUNO's competition here