Powell Industries, Inc. (POWL) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (POWL) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Electrical Equipment & Parts Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| POWL | $286.36 | +1.87% | 10.4B | 27.12 | $10.56 | +0.12% |
| ETN | $426.12 | +5.82% | 158.5B | 33.57 | $12.16 | +1.00% |
| VRT | $334.82 | +9.07% | 128.5B | 70.89 | $4.72 | +0.07% |
| BE | $302.70 | +10.07% | 86.1B | 265.54 | $1.14 | N/A |
| ABB | $37.13 | -1.14% | 69B | 23.65 | $1.57 | N/A |
| AME | $241.94 | +1.78% | 55.4B | 31.62 | $7.65 | +0.54% |
| HUBB | $523.20 | +1.65% | 27.6B | 27.88 | $18.76 | +1.06% |
| NVT | $169.61 | +3.83% | 27.4B | 45.11 | $3.76 | +0.48% |
| AEIS | $372.87 | +7.10% | 14.2B | 51.29 | $7.27 | +0.11% |
| FPS | $55.86 | +1.58% | 13.6B | 169.27 | $0.33 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
POWL vs ETN Comparison July 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 10.4B. In comparison, ETN has a market cap of 158.5B. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $286.36, while ETN trades at $426.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 27.12, whereas ETN's P/E ratio is 33.57. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to ETN's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is less volatile compared to ETN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check ETN's competition here
POWL vs VRT Comparison July 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 10.4B. In comparison, VRT has a market cap of 128.5B. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $286.36, while VRT trades at $334.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 27.12, whereas VRT's P/E ratio is 70.89. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to VRT's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is less volatile compared to VRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check VRT's competition here
POWL vs BE Comparison July 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 10.4B. In comparison, BE has a market cap of 86.1B. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $286.36, while BE trades at $302.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 27.12, whereas BE's P/E ratio is 265.54. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to BE's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is less volatile compared to BE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check BE's competition here
POWL vs ABB Comparison July 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 10.4B. In comparison, ABB has a market cap of 69B. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $286.36, while ABB trades at $37.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 27.12, whereas ABB's P/E ratio is 23.65. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to ABB's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is more volatile compared to ABB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check ABB's competition here
POWL vs AME Comparison July 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 10.4B. In comparison, AME has a market cap of 55.4B. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $286.36, while AME trades at $241.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 27.12, whereas AME's P/E ratio is 31.62. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to AME's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is more volatile compared to AME. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check AME's competition here
POWL vs HUBB Comparison July 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 10.4B. In comparison, HUBB has a market cap of 27.6B. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $286.36, while HUBB trades at $523.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 27.12, whereas HUBB's P/E ratio is 27.88. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to HUBB's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is more volatile compared to HUBB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check HUBB's competition here
POWL vs NVT Comparison July 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 10.4B. In comparison, NVT has a market cap of 27.4B. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $286.36, while NVT trades at $169.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 27.12, whereas NVT's P/E ratio is 45.11. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to NVT's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is less volatile compared to NVT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check NVT's competition here
POWL vs AEIS Comparison July 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 10.4B. In comparison, AEIS has a market cap of 14.2B. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $286.36, while AEIS trades at $372.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 27.12, whereas AEIS's P/E ratio is 51.29. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to AEIS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is less volatile compared to AEIS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check AEIS's competition here
POWL vs FPS Comparison July 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 10.4B. In comparison, FPS has a market cap of 13.6B. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $286.36, while FPS trades at $55.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 27.12, whereas FPS's P/E ratio is 169.27. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to FPS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is less volatile compared to FPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check FPS's competition here
POWL vs AYI Comparison July 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 10.4B. In comparison, AYI has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $286.36, while AYI trades at $376.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 27.12, whereas AYI's P/E ratio is 19.48. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to AYI's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is less volatile compared to AYI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check AYI's competition here
POWL vs ENS Comparison July 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 10.4B. In comparison, ENS has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $286.36, while ENS trades at $233.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 27.12, whereas ENS's P/E ratio is 22.06. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to ENS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is more volatile compared to ENS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check ENS's competition here
POWL vs WIRE Comparison July 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 10.4B. In comparison, WIRE has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $286.36, while WIRE trades at $289.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 27.12, whereas WIRE's P/E ratio is 15.22. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to WIRE's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is more volatile compared to WIRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check WIRE's competition here
POWL vs HAYW Comparison July 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 10.4B. In comparison, HAYW has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $286.36, while HAYW trades at $17.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 27.12, whereas HAYW's P/E ratio is 21.64. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to HAYW's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is more volatile compared to HAYW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check HAYW's competition here
POWL vs PLUG Comparison July 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 10.4B. In comparison, PLUG has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $286.36, while PLUG trades at $2.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 27.12, whereas PLUG's P/E ratio is -6.45. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to PLUG's ROE of -1.39%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is less volatile compared to PLUG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check PLUG's competition here
POWL vs ATKR Comparison July 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 10.4B. In comparison, ATKR has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $286.36, while ATKR trades at $76.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 27.12, whereas ATKR's P/E ratio is 17.35. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to ATKR's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is more volatile compared to ATKR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check ATKR's competition here
POWL vs THR Comparison July 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 10.4B. In comparison, THR has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $286.36, while THR trades at $61.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 27.12, whereas THR's P/E ratio is 44.96. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to THR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is more volatile compared to THR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check THR's competition here
POWL vs PLPC Comparison July 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 10.4B. In comparison, PLPC has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $286.36, while PLPC trades at $410.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 27.12, whereas PLPC's P/E ratio is 48.24. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to PLPC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is less volatile compared to PLPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check PLPC's competition here
POWL vs AMPX-WT Comparison July 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 10.4B. In comparison, AMPX-WT has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $286.36, while AMPX-WT trades at $5.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 27.12, whereas AMPX-WT's P/E ratio is -19.34. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to AMPX-WT's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is less volatile compared to AMPX-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check AMPX-WT's competition here
POWL vs AMPX Comparison July 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 10.4B. In comparison, AMPX has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $286.36, while AMPX trades at $13.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 27.12, whereas AMPX's P/E ratio is -106.58. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to AMPX's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is less volatile compared to AMPX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check AMPX's competition here
POWL vs FCEL Comparison July 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 10.4B. In comparison, FCEL has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $286.36, while FCEL trades at $36.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 27.12, whereas FCEL's P/E ratio is -12.72. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to FCEL's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is less volatile compared to FCEL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check FCEL's competition here
POWL vs TE Comparison July 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 10.4B. In comparison, TE has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $286.36, while TE trades at $9.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 27.12, whereas TE's P/E ratio is -5.73. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to TE's ROE of -1.46%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is less volatile compared to TE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check TE's competition here
POWL vs HOLI Comparison July 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 10.4B. In comparison, HOLI has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $286.36, while HOLI trades at $26.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 27.12, whereas HOLI's P/E ratio is 21.83. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to HOLI's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is more volatile compared to HOLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check HOLI's competition here
POWL vs EOSE Comparison July 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 10.4B. In comparison, EOSE has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $286.36, while EOSE trades at $5.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 27.12, whereas EOSE's P/E ratio is -0.88. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to EOSE's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is less volatile compared to EOSE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check EOSE's competition here
POWL vs TE-WT Comparison July 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 10.4B. In comparison, TE-WT has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $286.36, while TE-WT trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 27.12, whereas TE-WT's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to TE-WT's ROE of -1.46%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is less volatile compared to TE-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check TE-WT's competition here
POWL vs ENR Comparison July 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 10.4B. In comparison, ENR has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $286.36, while ENR trades at $21.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 27.12, whereas ENR's P/E ratio is 6.25. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to ENR's ROE of +1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is more volatile compared to ENR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check ENR's competition here
POWL vs ENVX Comparison July 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 10.4B. In comparison, ENVX has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $286.36, while ENVX trades at $6.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 27.12, whereas ENVX's P/E ratio is -11.04. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to ENVX's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is less volatile compared to ENVX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check ENVX's competition here
POWL vs ADSEW Comparison July 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 10.4B. In comparison, ADSEW has a market cap of 908.9M. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $286.36, while ADSEW trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 27.12, whereas ADSEW's P/E ratio is -0.54. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to ADSEW's ROE of +4.92%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is less volatile compared to ADSEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check ADSEW's competition here
POWL vs NNE Comparison July 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 10.4B. In comparison, NNE has a market cap of 879.1M. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $286.36, while NNE trades at $21.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 27.12, whereas NNE's P/E ratio is -30.64. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to NNE's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is less volatile compared to NNE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check NNE's competition here
POWL vs NRGV Comparison July 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 10.4B. In comparison, NRGV has a market cap of 836.9M. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $286.36, while NRGV trades at $4.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 27.12, whereas NRGV's P/E ratio is -6.61. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to NRGV's ROE of -1.71%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is less volatile compared to NRGV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check NRGV's competition here
POWL vs ADSE Comparison July 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 10.4B. In comparison, ADSE has a market cap of 770.6M. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $286.36, while ADSE trades at $12.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 27.12, whereas ADSE's P/E ratio is -10.33. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to ADSE's ROE of +4.92%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is less volatile compared to ADSE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check ADSE's competition here
POWL vs KE Comparison July 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 10.4B. In comparison, KE has a market cap of 615.7M. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $286.36, while KE trades at $25.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 27.12, whereas KE's P/E ratio is 17.78. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to KE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is less volatile compared to KE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check KE's competition here
POWL vs SLDPW Comparison July 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 10.4B. In comparison, SLDPW has a market cap of 492.8M. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $286.36, while SLDPW trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 27.12, whereas SLDPW's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to SLDPW's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is less volatile compared to SLDPW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check SLDPW's competition here
POWL vs SLDP Comparison July 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 10.4B. In comparison, SLDP has a market cap of 478.3M. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $286.36, while SLDP trades at $2.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 27.12, whereas SLDP's P/E ratio is -5.40. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to SLDP's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is less volatile compared to SLDP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check SLDP's competition here
POWL vs EOSEW Comparison July 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 10.4B. In comparison, EOSEW has a market cap of 423.2M. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $286.36, while EOSEW trades at $1.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 27.12, whereas EOSEW's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to EOSEW's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is less volatile compared to EOSEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check EOSEW's competition here
POWL vs ELVA Comparison July 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 10.4B. In comparison, ELVA has a market cap of 410.4M. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $286.36, while ELVA trades at $10.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 27.12, whereas ELVA's P/E ratio is 87.50. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to ELVA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is less volatile compared to ELVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check ELVA's competition here
POWL vs AIRJW Comparison July 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 10.4B. In comparison, AIRJW has a market cap of 409.5M. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $286.36, while AIRJW trades at $1.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 27.12, whereas AIRJW's P/E ratio is -1.05. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to AIRJW's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is less volatile compared to AIRJW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check AIRJW's competition here
POWL vs AIRJ Comparison July 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 10.4B. In comparison, AIRJ has a market cap of 401.1M. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $286.36, while AIRJ trades at $5.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 27.12, whereas AIRJ's P/E ratio is -24.09. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to AIRJ's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is less volatile compared to AIRJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check AIRJ's competition here
POWL vs MVST Comparison July 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 10.4B. In comparison, MVST has a market cap of 394.8M. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $286.36, while MVST trades at $1.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 27.12, whereas MVST's P/E ratio is -19.75. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to MVST's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is less volatile compared to MVST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check MVST's competition here
POWL vs MVSTW Comparison July 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 10.4B. In comparison, MVSTW has a market cap of 348.1M. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $286.36, while MVSTW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 27.12, whereas MVSTW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to MVSTW's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is less volatile compared to MVSTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check MVSTW's competition here
POWL vs FREY-WT Comparison July 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 10.4B. In comparison, FREY-WT has a market cap of 241.8M. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $286.36, while FREY-WT trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 27.12, whereas FREY-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to FREY-WT's ROE of -2.06%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is more volatile compared to FREY-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check FREY-WT's competition here
POWL vs FREY Comparison July 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 10.4B. In comparison, FREY has a market cap of 241.8M. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $286.36, while FREY trades at $1.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 27.12, whereas FREY's P/E ratio is -13.91. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to FREY's ROE of -1.89%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is less volatile compared to FREY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check FREY's competition here
POWL vs RFIL Comparison July 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 10.4B. In comparison, RFIL has a market cap of 230.2M. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $286.36, while RFIL trades at $21.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 27.12, whereas RFIL's P/E ratio is 42.42. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to RFIL's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is less volatile compared to RFIL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check RFIL's competition here
POWL vs LTBR Comparison July 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 10.4B. In comparison, LTBR has a market cap of 227.8M. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $286.36, while LTBR trades at $8.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 27.12, whereas LTBR's P/E ratio is -11.42. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to LTBR's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is more volatile compared to LTBR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check LTBR's competition here
POWL vs ESP Comparison July 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 10.4B. In comparison, ESP has a market cap of 201.5M. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $286.36, while ESP trades at $67.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 27.12, whereas ESP's P/E ratio is 17.75. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to ESP's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is less volatile compared to ESP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check ESP's competition here
POWL vs SES-WT Comparison July 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 10.4B. In comparison, SES-WT has a market cap of 185.2M. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $286.36, while SES-WT trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 27.12, whereas SES-WT's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to SES-WT's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is less volatile compared to SES-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check SES-WT's competition here
POWL vs ENVXW Comparison July 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 10.4B. In comparison, ENVXW has a market cap of 158.8M. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $286.36, while ENVXW trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 27.12, whereas ENVXW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to ENVXW's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is less volatile compared to ENVXW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check ENVXW's competition here
POWL vs TGEN Comparison July 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 10.4B. In comparison, TGEN has a market cap of 157.1M. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $286.36, while TGEN trades at $5.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 27.12, whereas TGEN's P/E ratio is -18.10. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to TGEN's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is less volatile compared to TGEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check TGEN's competition here
POWL vs EAF Comparison July 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 10.4B. In comparison, EAF has a market cap of 153.9M. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $286.36, while EAF trades at $5.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 27.12, whereas EAF's P/E ratio is -0.83. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to EAF's ROE of +0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is less volatile compared to EAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check EAF's competition here
POWL vs SKYX Comparison July 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 10.4B. In comparison, SKYX has a market cap of 120.2M. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $286.36, while SKYX trades at $1.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 27.12, whereas SKYX's P/E ratio is -3.81. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to SKYX's ROE of -4.33%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is less volatile compared to SKYX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check SKYX's competition here
POWL vs SVT Comparison July 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 10.4B. In comparison, SVT has a market cap of 120M. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $286.36, while SVT trades at $46.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 27.12, whereas SVT's P/E ratio is -120.36. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to SVT's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is more volatile compared to SVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check SVT's competition here
POWL vs NEOV Comparison July 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 10.4B. In comparison, NEOV has a market cap of 112.9M. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $286.36, while NEOV trades at $3.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 27.12, whereas NEOV's P/E ratio is -9.55. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to NEOV's ROE of -1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is less volatile compared to NEOV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check NEOV's competition here
POWL vs ULBI Comparison July 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 10.4B. In comparison, ULBI has a market cap of 105.3M. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $286.36, while ULBI trades at $6.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 27.12, whereas ULBI's P/E ratio is 70.22. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to ULBI's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is less volatile compared to ULBI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check ULBI's competition here
POWL vs STI Comparison July 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 10.4B. In comparison, STI has a market cap of 78.9M. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $286.36, while STI trades at $9.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 27.12, whereas STI's P/E ratio is -0.72. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to STI's ROE of +4.41%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is less volatile compared to STI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check STI's competition here
POWL vs NVX Comparison July 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 10.4B. In comparison, NVX has a market cap of 68.2M. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $286.36, while NVX trades at $0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 27.12, whereas NVX's P/E ratio is -0.81. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to NVX's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is less volatile compared to NVX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check NVX's competition here
POWL vs NEOVW Comparison July 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 10.4B. In comparison, NEOVW has a market cap of 63.1M. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $286.36, while NEOVW trades at $1.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 27.12, whereas NEOVW's P/E ratio is -7.97. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to NEOVW's ROE of -1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is less volatile compared to NEOVW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check NEOVW's competition here
POWL vs CBAT Comparison July 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 10.4B. In comparison, CBAT has a market cap of 52.4M. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $286.36, while CBAT trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 27.12, whereas CBAT's P/E ratio is -5.63. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to CBAT's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is less volatile compared to CBAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check CBAT's competition here
POWL vs OPTT Comparison July 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 10.4B. In comparison, OPTT has a market cap of 48.3M. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $286.36, while OPTT trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 27.12, whereas OPTT's P/E ratio is -1.41. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to OPTT's ROE of -1.54%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is less volatile compared to OPTT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check OPTT's competition here
POWL vs IPWR Comparison July 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 10.4B. In comparison, IPWR has a market cap of 46M. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $286.36, while IPWR trades at $5.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 27.12, whereas IPWR's P/E ratio is -4.50. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to IPWR's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is less volatile compared to IPWR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check IPWR's competition here
POWL vs ZOOZ Comparison July 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 10.4B. In comparison, ZOOZ has a market cap of 44.9M. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $286.36, while ZOOZ trades at $5.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 27.12, whereas ZOOZ's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to ZOOZ's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is more volatile compared to ZOOZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check ZOOZ's competition here
POWL vs PPSI Comparison July 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 10.4B. In comparison, PPSI has a market cap of 43.7M. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $286.36, while PPSI trades at $3.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 27.12, whereas PPSI's P/E ratio is -6.35. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to PPSI's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is less volatile compared to PPSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check PPSI's competition here
POWL vs OESX Comparison July 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 10.4B. In comparison, OESX has a market cap of 39.9M. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $286.36, while OESX trades at $11.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 27.12, whereas OESX's P/E ratio is -23.86. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to OESX's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is less volatile compared to OESX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check OESX's competition here
POWL vs APWC Comparison July 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 10.4B. In comparison, APWC has a market cap of 34.8M. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $286.36, while APWC trades at $1.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 27.12, whereas APWC's P/E ratio is 4.83. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to APWC's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is less volatile compared to APWC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check APWC's competition here
POWL vs SCWO Comparison July 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 10.4B. In comparison, SCWO has a market cap of 28.1M. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $286.36, while SCWO trades at $1.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 27.12, whereas SCWO's P/E ratio is -2.18. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to SCWO's ROE of -3.39%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is less volatile compared to SCWO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check SCWO's competition here
POWL vs DFLIW Comparison July 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 10.4B. In comparison, DFLIW has a market cap of 27.7M. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $286.36, while DFLIW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 27.12, whereas DFLIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to DFLIW's ROE of +12.27%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is less volatile compared to DFLIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check DFLIW's competition here
POWL vs DFLI Comparison July 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 10.4B. In comparison, DFLI has a market cap of 25.1M. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $286.36, while DFLI trades at $1.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 27.12, whereas DFLI's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to DFLI's ROE of +12.27%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is less volatile compared to DFLI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check DFLI's competition here
POWL vs FLUX Comparison July 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 10.4B. In comparison, FLUX has a market cap of 15.1M. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $286.36, while FLUX trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 27.12, whereas FLUX's P/E ratio is -2.79. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to FLUX's ROE of -7.38%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is less volatile compared to FLUX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check FLUX's competition here
POWL vs GWH Comparison July 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 10.4B. In comparison, GWH has a market cap of 12M. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $286.36, while GWH trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 27.12, whereas GWH's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to GWH's ROE of -12.52%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is less volatile compared to GWH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check GWH's competition here
POWL vs PITA Comparison July 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 10.4B. In comparison, PITA has a market cap of 11.1M. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $286.36, while PITA trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 27.12, whereas PITA's P/E ratio is -2.92. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to PITA's ROE of +2.03%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is more volatile compared to PITA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check PITA's competition here
POWL vs GCDT Comparison July 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 10.4B. In comparison, GCDT has a market cap of 5.6M. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $286.36, while GCDT trades at $0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 27.12, whereas GCDT's P/E ratio is -9.33. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to GCDT's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is less volatile compared to GCDT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check GCDT's competition here
POWL vs NXU Comparison July 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 10.4B. In comparison, NXU has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $286.36, while NXU trades at $2.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 27.12, whereas NXU's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to NXU's ROE of -1.71%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is more volatile compared to NXU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check NXU's competition here
POWL vs POLA Comparison July 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 10.4B. In comparison, POLA has a market cap of 5M. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $286.36, while POLA trades at $1.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 27.12, whereas POLA's P/E ratio is -0.57. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to POLA's ROE of -2.61%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is more volatile compared to POLA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check POLA's competition here
POWL vs GWH-WT Comparison July 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 10.4B. In comparison, GWH-WT has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $286.36, while GWH-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 27.12, whereas GWH-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to GWH-WT's ROE of -12.52%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is less volatile compared to GWH-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check GWH-WT's competition here
POWL vs XPON Comparison July 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 10.4B. In comparison, XPON has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $286.36, while XPON trades at $0.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 27.12, whereas XPON's P/E ratio is -0.38. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to XPON's ROE of -1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is more volatile compared to XPON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check XPON's competition here
POWL vs ELPW Comparison July 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 10.4B. In comparison, ELPW has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $286.36, while ELPW trades at $0.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 27.12, whereas ELPW's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to ELPW's ROE of +3.89%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is less volatile compared to ELPW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check ELPW's competition here
POWL vs CCTG Comparison July 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 10.4B. In comparison, CCTG has a market cap of 879.7K. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $286.36, while CCTG trades at $0.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 27.12, whereas CCTG's P/E ratio is -0.55. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to CCTG's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is less volatile compared to CCTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check CCTG's competition here
POWL vs RAYA Comparison July 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 10.4B. In comparison, RAYA has a market cap of 268.1K. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $286.36, while RAYA trades at $2.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 27.12, whereas RAYA's P/E ratio is -0.27. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to RAYA's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is less volatile compared to RAYA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check RAYA's competition here
POWL vs ZOOZW Comparison July 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 10.4B. In comparison, ZOOZW has a market cap of 231.8K. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $286.36, while ZOOZW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 27.12, whereas ZOOZW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to ZOOZW's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is less volatile compared to ZOOZW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check ZOOZW's competition here
POWL vs DCFCW Comparison July 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 10.4B. In comparison, DCFCW has a market cap of 11.2K. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $286.36, while DCFCW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 27.12, whereas DCFCW's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to DCFCW's ROE of +1.31%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is less volatile compared to DCFCW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check DCFCW's competition here
POWL vs DCFC Comparison July 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 10.4B. In comparison, DCFC has a market cap of 9.1K. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $286.36, while DCFC trades at $3.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 27.12, whereas DCFC's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to DCFC's ROE of +1.32%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is more volatile compared to DCFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check DCFC's competition here
POWL vs AIRM Comparison July 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 10.4B. In comparison, AIRM has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $286.36, while AIRM trades at $42.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 27.12, whereas AIRM's P/E ratio is 15.80. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to AIRM's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is more volatile compared to AIRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check AIRM's competition here
POWL vs BLNKW Comparison July 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 10.4B. In comparison, BLNKW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $286.36, while BLNKW trades at $10.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 27.12, whereas BLNKW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to BLNKW's ROE of -1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is less volatile compared to BLNKW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check BLNKW's competition here
POWL vs JUNO Comparison July 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 10.4B. In comparison, JUNO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $286.36, while JUNO trades at $86.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 27.12, whereas JUNO's P/E ratio is -20.89. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to JUNO's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is more volatile compared to JUNO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check JUNO's competition here
POWL vs OCESP Comparison July 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 10.4B. In comparison, OCESP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $286.36, while OCESP trades at $16.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 27.12, whereas OCESP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to OCESP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is more volatile compared to OCESP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check OCESP's competition here
POWL vs ENR-PA Comparison July 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 10.4B. In comparison, ENR-PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $286.36, while ENR-PA trades at $89.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 27.12, whereas ENR-PA's P/E ratio is 42.39. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to ENR-PA's ROE of +1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is more volatile compared to ENR-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check ENR-PA's competition here